Why there is no evidence for a new Maunder Minimum
•Transferir como PPT, PDF•
0 gostou•3,262 visualizações
Douglas Biesecker, a scientist at the Space Weather Prediction Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, prepared this Powerpoint presentation to summarize his concerns about new predictions of a deep, protracted lull in solar activity. “I consider the strength of evidence to be anemic and the reasoning to be highly suspect,” he told me for a post on Dot Earth: Would Solar Lull Snuff Climate Action? - http://nyti.ms/il0Wqj
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Why there is no evidence for a new Maunder Minimum
Semelhante a Why there is no evidence for a new Maunder Minimum (20)
Mais de Earth Institute of Columbia University
Mais de Earth Institute of Columbia University (20)
Último
Último (20)
Why there is no evidence for a new Maunder Minimum
- 1. Why there is no evidence for a new Maunder Minimum Doug Biesecker
- 2. Appearance of Jet Streams aka Torsional Oscillations Solar Min Start of Poleward Branch Solar Min Weak and patchy
- 4. The slowing ‘rush to the poles’ Cycle 21 (10.3 yrs) Cycle 22 (10.0 yrs) Cycle 23 (12.2 yrs)