2. Summary
• Evolution of Ideas to Religion & then to Philosophy
• Hotbeds of Philosophy
• Overview of Greek Philosophy
• The Rise of Islam
• The Rise of Islamic Philosophy
– A model: Theology + Shariat + Retrofitting
– Ethnic Composition of Islamic Philosophers
– Movements of philosophical ideas
– Geopolitics of the time
– The frictions between dogma and rationalism
– The Aftermath
• The Implications on Today 2
4. Philosophical Heritage Prior to Islam
• The Mesopotamia Cultures:
– 3 (or 4) ethnic groups
– foundation for philosophy and modern sciences
– Torn itself out by wars and famines
• The Seafaring Greek Culture:
– Built on Mesopotamian, Egyptian & Hellenic roots
– Homeric poetry created a conduit for ideas
– Many rival city states but conductive of ideas
– Thrived with generating diverse philosophical doctrines
– Academia, peripatetic, Stoic, Neo-Platonism, sceptics ...
4
5. Collapse of Greek Philosophy
• Greek Philosophy had “holes,” e.g.
• Gorgias (485-380 BC): “there is no truth, only argument; the art
of rhetoric”.
• B. Russell states that: Greek Sceptics argued that “there could
never be a rational ground for preferring one course of
action over another”
• Greek philosophy was good but not a panacea
• Greek Philosophy injected an Aristotelian component to
Christianity but then collapsed!
• Christianity emerged by synthesising a new order:
– The Aristotelian component from Greek philosophy
– A Sacred component from the Jewish tradition
– The Roman rule of law
• The new order was a thoroughly dogmatic and this model was
rolled out throughout the Roman world
5
6. The Rise of Islam
• Islam brought revolutionary but fixated ideas
• Proclaimed divinity and sanctity
• Demanded submission and rejected challenge
• Prophet Mohammad was a preacher and a ruler too
• Many empires just melted before the fast advancing Islam
• BUT Islam was not born with an institutional arrangement
• The Quran: the “revealed words of God” overarching
unrevealed words
• Words: the substance of the Islamic thinking
• Words and power drove plethora of sects
• Arabic is rather superfluous and open to interpretation
6
7. The Rise of Islamic Philosophy
• The Abbasid Empire (750- 1258) were open to any
measure to expand their empire
• Taxing the vast empire was facilitated by:
– The arrival of paper from China
– Alkhwarzmi’s maths, popularising Indian “0”
– Simplifying Alphabet from Kufi to Naskh
– Adopting Greek Philosophy against
dissenting voices (e.g. the Khurramis in Azerbaijan)
7
8. A Model for Islamic Philosophy
• The Model: Kalam + Shariat + Philosophy
• In reality the model evolved as:
• What is retrofitting?
• Three examples
• So Philosophy was employed
to serve theology but some
freethinkers emerged to
condition theology!
• Note the difference:
Christianity turned away
from freethinking right at
the beginning!
8
9. Emergence of sectarianism before philosophy
• Emerging sects transformed any elasticity in the
Islamic culture into plasticity
• The Sunni sect:
– The Quran: interpreting literally Mohammad’s revelations
– Sunna (tradition): Mohammad’s activities/words
– Icma: the consensus of testimonies of the apostles
– Ijtihad: beyond the above to deal with rogue issues
– Shariat: the law without codes (regulates the individuals
relating to god i.e. it is intrusive, and regulates the role of
man in the society)
• The Shii Sect:
• Other smaller Sects also emerged
9
10. Philosophy with Wider Contexts
• Ideas evolve and interact as bundles of movements
• Movements of philosophical doctrines (Reason )
• Movements of Faith (religion)
• Movements of Literature (poetry and prose)
• Movements of Fine Arts
• Movements of Architecture
• Movement of knowledge (science)
• Conduits for Movements
10
11. Ethnicity in Islamic Philosophy
• Three ethnic peoples and their mindsets:
– The Arabs: superfluous language, old polytheism replaced
by monotheism, rather autocratic and strong-minded,
very negative on women but Islam was improved it a bit
– The Turks: unequivocal language; fierce fighters and keen
in ruling; rule by consensus and by pluralism, progressive
on women issues with influential women
– The Persians: a pidgin language (but poetic), past glory/
self-aggrandisement, autocratic, fundamentalism, very
reactionary on women issues
– No underrating of Assyrians and Jewish intellectual inputs
11
12. The Priming of the Greek Philosophy
• Greek Philosophy was dead for 4-6 centuries
• It had to be primed just like priming a pump!
• The Great Al Kindi (?-872) translated
the Enneads, thinking that it was
Aristotle’s works. This is what priming
means, i.e. no tradition? Well, invent
one!
12
13. The Model – Brewing its substance
• Islamic philosophy ripped open every issues,
Discoursing on a variety of topics
• A rich mixture of Aristotelian, Platonic, Stoic, Neo-
Platonic and other ideas emerged rapidly
• Conflicts were observed between faith & reason
• Vibrant Islamic Philosophy gave rise to movements
13
14. The centres of learning
• Baghdad and Basra, the centre for all ethnicities
• Damascus, Halab (Aleppo), Najaf
• Bukhara and Samarkand, Qashghar
• Tus, Nishapur, Rey, Isfahan
• Tebriz, Maragha, Berde, Genje and Hemedan
• Konya, Harran, Istanbul
• Cairo
• Cordova in Andalusia (Spain)
14
15. Movements: The Qadarite & Jabarites
• The Umayyad (661-750) were not chuffed with religion
• They used Sectarianism to control challenges from Shi’a
• Intellectual debate emerged on responsibility for deeds, reward
/ punishment, predestination, everything depends on His Will ...
• The Qadarite (qadar = power, i.e. Power for action and responsibility:
– A Qadarite lost his life for heresy: Ma‘bad al-Juhani in 699 A.D.
Reward / Man needs
Due to To take responsibility for their deeds
Punishment Freewill
God’s Reward /
Thus To create Predestination To facilitate
Absolute will Punishment
• The Jabarites:
– Used God’s absolute will to justify predestination &explain reward/punishment
God has Predestination Reward /
As And sets To facilitate
Absolute Will Punishment
Man needs Reward /
Thus To perform Punishment To become responsible for the deeds 15
Freewill
16. Movements - The Mu’tazile-s
• The Mu’tazile-s (the splinters) 8th-14th century
– A rationalist movement against dogmatism; Basra and Baghdad schools
– Founder: Wasil ibn Ataa, ?-748, (student of Hasan Basri)
– Dissidence: punishment after death, indestructible soul; how can it turn
to ashes by burning
– No fate but we meet the outcomes of our actions
– First to show signs of freethinking in Islamic cultures
– Attributes of punishment/rewards are humanly; not godly
– The Quran is the word of man and not God; there is no miracle
– There is nothing outside our minds (hence their rationalism)
– The Five Tenets: (1) the unity of God; (2) divine justice; (3) the promise
and the threat; (4) the intermediate position; and (5) the commanding
of good and forbidding of evil
– (1) responsibility for action but no fate; (2) no to anthropomorphic God
features (3) no to the great sin and repentance is good enough; (4) God
cannot forgive on behalf of other but on his own behalf; (5) the
commanding of good-deed and forbidding of ill-deeds
16
17. Movements – the Aristetelian school
The Peripatetic school – Meshaiyyun (with some Platonism)
• Al Kindi (?-872): Islam & philosophy not inconsistent
• Al Farabi (876-950) produced 1st authentic Aristotelian philosophy
– Integrated Platonism + Aristotelianism + Shariat
– Pluralism: excellent nations and excellent cities can coexist with
different religions.
– Subtle Scepticism in Farabi’s Mindset: Religion is the route to
unsophisticated truth and to simple believer; philosophy is a version of
it, albeit, of poorer conceptual quality Avicenna
– God knows generality but not details; from 1271
– Seeds of Meme(!): matter: eternal; soul: mortal; but the soul lives as a
contact between the generations
• Inb Sina (980-1037) with tendency towards Sufism (Illuminism)
– He sees a conflict in integrating matter with soul
• Ibn Rushd, Averroes, (1126 – 1198) – Andalusia (Spain)
– Seeds of Meme (!): Soul is a developed matter and mortal;
Immortality is the humanity, which lives through generations
• Repudiation by Alghazel proved problematic
18. Movements – the Dahriyyun (Atheists, materialists)
•Progressive materialist/sensualist movement
•Emerged and developed in the 10th century
•Deny vehemently metaphysics and soul
•Believe in the eternity of time durations (Mafatih al-'ulum)
•Believe in the eternity of the cosmos but not on creation
•Everything is matter and composed of atoms
•Proponents: Ibn Ravendi (827–911), Beshshar, Salih
ibn Abdul Quds and later Sheykh Bedreddin (1359–1420)
•Their ideas survived only through discussions by opponents.
•These ungodly men said: 'There is nothing to save our life in
this world; we live and we die, and only a period of time (or: the
course of time, dahr) makes us perish‘ (http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ei2/dahriyya.htm)
18
19. Movements – the Asha’ri-s. theosophy
• The early Asha’ri-s)
– Founded by Abul Hasan Ash’ari (873-935)
– A pupil of al-Jubba'i, of the Basra-n Mu'tazila
– Guided by revelation to present his vision
– Used Kalam as the basis for his reasoning
• The late Asha’ri-s
– Algazel (1058-1111) similar to Kant in being
forceful but in the service of dogma)
– The Incoherence of the Philosophers
Abū Ḥāmed
– Mysticism with orthodoxy (theosophy) Muḥammad
ibn Muḥammad Ghazālī
19
20. Movements - clash of faith v. reason
• Showdown on Muteziles
– Dubbed as dualists: (i) having power over deeds
interpreted as being a creator, (ii) almighty God
– Blasphemy: man must do what is best for man
– Undermining the doctrine of Revelation: evil is evil
intrinsically but not because God says so.
• Showdown on Peripatetic Philosophers
– The incoherence of the philosophers by Alghazel
– Appendix to The Revival of Religious Sciences
– Remedying decay of faith in Islam caused by philosophers
– After this rational philosophies declined
20
21. Movements - Stoicism
• Stoic School – pantheism/materialism (Revaqiyyun)
– Physics, ethics and logics
– The soul is a tabula rasa; only sensations are true
– God manifests & unify with nature in human forms
– Manifestation is not through a single person but open to all
• Hurufi-s founded by Neimi
– The World was created by God and changes continually
– God manifests:
Humans resemble God : (i) as prophets, (ii) as guardian imams
(vilayet), and (iii) as Neimi (both leader and God)
Mystically as in voice, speech or Quranic words
– A sense of Platonic realism: pre-existing word
– A sense of Neo-Platonism by stepped view
21
22. Movements – Illuminism / Sufism
• Illuminsim Founded by Shehabeddin Sovreverdi (1153-1191)
– Integrated his conception of light with Neo-Platonism
– As in esoteric, he searches for truth hidden in words
– Knowledge-by-presence: the light of our, self, brings to our
awareness of important aspects of the truth
– Light manifests on its own; darkness is the absence of light but
not another ontological being; we see immanence and
transcendental light; immanent light is impure; matter obtains
light from the immanent light; discontinuing this light give rise
to darkness; Illuminism is all about the transcendental light.
• Sufism – spectrum from monotheism to pantheism
– heterogeneous doctrines all lacks ontology
– (i) Theology: No god but (the) God,; (ii) some Sufis: there is no one but him; (iii)
some : there is no me other than me, (iv) some: I am the righteous one.
– The Sufi’s truth realised in four stages: (i) good Shariat observer, (ii) submit
your will to God (Teriqet); (iii) submit your mind to God (Gnosis = merifet); (iv)
unify with God through ecstasy
• Asceticism (Zohd): • Gnosticism (irfan):
– Theosophism: Asceticism + Sufism – Irfan + Sufism (e.g. Hallaj)
– Pure Asceticism (Zohd) – Kalam + Irfan (Iranian existentialism)
22
23. Movements since the 14th century
• After the showdown, development
niches were open to:
• Esoteric & exoteric practices (existed before)
• The Sufis (existed before)
• The Hurifi-s (pantheism) - Stoicism
• Existentialism
• Gnostics
24. Those who suffered execution
• Ma‘bad al-Juhani (Qadarite) in 699 AD
• Mansur al-Hallaj: Gnosticism (922)
• EynulQuzat Miyaneji (Abu’l-maʿālī
ʿabdallāh Abībakr Mohammad
Bin
Mayānejī) hanged in 1131
• Shahabeddin Sohrevedi (1191) in Aleppo
• Imadeddin Nesimi – a Hurufi (1417)
• Sheykh Bedreddin – a Dahri (1420)
• Fezlullah Neimi Astarabadi (1395)
• The death of rationalism
24
25. Post-mortem Analysis
• Islamic philosophy was closer than the Greek Philosophy to
stumble into science
• Both collapsed under their own weights
• European philosophy was saved from the same fate by science
• Islamic philosophy has now been transmuted into theosophy
• The image of self-righteousness and the culture of curse: The
Fiqh Concerning those who Insult the Messenger of Allah:
“As for those who abuse Allah and His Messenger,
Allah’s curse is on them in the dunya and the akhira.
He has prepared a humiliating punishment for them.”
• Modern culture mistakes reason (philosophy) with
faith (theology), e.g. analysis of Wikipedia
• Home-grown debate and movements yet to emerge
• Freethinking now: what should be its vehicle?
Religion, Atheism or Science or a Combination? 25
26. A Reminder on Movements
Asharis Theosophy
Asceticism
Mind
Existentialism
Sufism
Stoicism
1
Rationalism
Dehriyyun
Peripatetic (Meshaiyyun)
Muteziles and Asharis
Qadarites and Jabarites
2
The emergence of sects
2000
1300
1400
1200
661
750
661
622
Timeline 26
27. Conclusions
• Fight fundamentalism OR nurture freethinking?
• Dialogue between religions OR dialogue among
communities?
• Superiority of western culture (implying the
others no good) OR sustainable global culture?
• Core Problem: Conduits of movements for ideas
• Pluralise NOT Perish; diversify NOT dwindle
• Muslim feminism NOT Muslim Human Rights
• Open up channels of movements for ideas NOT Quietism
27
30. • The Abul Hasan Ash’ari-s doctrines (http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ei2/ashari.htm):
1. God has eternal attributes such as knowledge, sight, speech, and owing to these attributes he
is knowing, seeing, speaking; whereas the Mu'taziles assign no attributes to God, distinct from
His essence.
2. God sits on the throne and his anthropomorphic features (hand and face) are real but their
precise nature is unknown; whereas the Mu'taziles deny anthropomorphic features of God and
interpret these Quranic expressions, as 'grace', 'essence' and so on.
3. Quran is God's speech, an eternal attribute, and therefore uncreated; whereas the the
Mu'taziles hold that the Quran to have been created.
4. The vision of God is real but we cannot understand its manner; whereas the Mu'taziles do
not take God in a literal sense.
5. God is omnipotent and everything, good or evil, is willed by him; he creates the acts of men by
creating in men the power to do each act – the doctrine of 'acquisition' or kasb; whereas, the
Mu'taziles insist on the reality of choice in human activity
6. A Muslim committed a wrong deed remains a Muslim but liable to punishment in the Fire;
whereas the Mu'taziles hold that wrong-doing is not a matter of religion (the doctrine of al-
manzila bayn al-manzilatayn)
7. Eschatological features, such as the Basin, the Bridge, the Balance and intercession by
Muhammad, are real; but these are denied by the Mu'taziles.
30
31. The Basis of Shahabbedin’s Illuminism
• You do not fit words for describing the reality but
amplify the idea through exploration/contemplation
• Philosophy is to sense for inspiration, revelation, guess
• To do philosophy is to act like a prophet but man
gathers light step-by-step and enhances towards it
• One step of revelation takes towards another step
• The world of meaning cannot be reached simply by
words, but man can only reach it on his own, where
philosophy just is just helpful in showing the way.
• There is no, body or soul, and the body like all matter
is dark but as this body journeys towards light, it
enhances and then becomes illuminated
31
32. Post-mortem Analysis
List of Muslim philosophers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_philosophers)
Philosophers: 20, Sufis (20), Theosophists +Theologians (40)
32
35. God has
As Absolute And sets Predestination To facilitate Reward /
Will Punishment
Thus Man needs Reward /
Freewill To perform To become responsible for the deeds
Punishment
Due to Reward / Man needs To take responsibility for their deeds
Punishment Freewill
God’s Reward /
Thus Absolute To create Predestination To facilitate
Punishment
Will
Notas do Editor
I am going to save you with the evolution of titles of this presentation. This is largely because I went through a considerable amount of learning. To start with, my knowledge was fragmentary. So I started reading through and at the end I connected these fragments together. This presentation is its outcome but the main focus is on the breadth of the subject and not on its depth. Anyway I am not an authority on the subject and confess that I do not have an in-depth knowledge on the subject. But I guess I know more than many of you here on the subject, because of my background and nothing else.So, let me set the scene:GeopoliticsRetrofitting the Greek philosophyDebatePersecutionSo was there freethinking in the Islamic philosophy? The response is yes, there was freethinking in the Islamic philosophy.What are the implications for today? The response is let me not jump to the conclusion.
Conduit of ideas run parallel to the equator without crossing natural barriersSo the American continents were not a suitable conduitThe modern man colonised the planet Earth by 10,000 years ago but when living as hunter-gatherers. In the last 10,000 years, ethnic enterprises have been engaged in interactions and conflicts, where empires have emerged and vanished one after another.Religion as we know emerged among the Sumerian-Ilamite-Turkic alliances in the Fertile Crescent, the Egyptians and the Semite peoplesThe way of life in the Fertile Crescent generated many of the building blocks for the civilised life, and above all it was conducive to philosophy mathematics and science but the arrival of big empires to the region suffocated this potential.The Egyptian civilisation was preoccupied with life after death and did not develop any philosophy.Cretan and Minoan seem to have absorbed Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilisations some 3600 years ago and transferred it to the mainland GreeceThe hunter-gatherer Indo-European clans were living behind the Carpathian Mountains and started moving on towards Greece (Ionians, Achaeans and Dorians); and towards IndiaThe Chinese peoples as hunter-gatherer had probably arrive some 5,000 years but their civilization took off some 4,000 years ago
http://thinkexist.com/quotes/cicero/2.htmlAccording to Cicero: “There is no statement so absurd that no philosopher will make it.”
The word to virtue (erdem): fazilet, hassa, hassasiyyet, maziyyet, Mukteza, Hokm, Hobbu intizam, kudret kuvvetPurpose (erek): Gaye, gayet,, nihayet, akibet, murad, ummiye, hedef, matlub, maksat, Wisdom (bilge): himket, rushtu kiyaset, ilmu merifet, basiret, akil,ilim,felsefeConscience (bilinc): shuur, istishar, zamir, hatir, idrak, ilim, vukuf, vicdan batin, hissi nefs, akide, itikad, insaf
Some notes are taken from (http://www.al-islam.org/mananddestiny/3.htm)
Followers: Jahiz (?-868), Muammer Ibn Abbad, Abil HuseynnBasri, El Nusaybini and HishamIf we act as instructed by our fate (and we perform according to the way the strings are pulled), then why are we being punished? According to Jahiz, doubt is the first condition for information
According to Aristotle, there is no duality of God and matter; matters takes its power from God; and God spontaneously behaves according to the laws of matter.
The AbulHasanAsh’ari-s doctrines (http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ei2/ashari.htm):God has eternal attributes such as knowledge, sight, speech, and owing to these attributes he is knowing, seeing, speaking; whereas the Mu'taziles assign no attributes to God, distinct from His essence.God sits on the throne and his anthropomorphic features (hand and face) are real but their precise nature is unknown; whereas the Mu'taziles deny anthropomorphic features of God and interpret these Quranic expressions, as 'grace', 'essence' and so on. Quran is God's speech, an eternal attribute, and therefore uncreated; whereas the theMu'taziles hold that the Quran to have been created.The vision of God is real but we cannot understand its manner; whereas the Mu'taziles do not take God in a literal sense.God is omnipotent and everything, good or evil, is willed by him; he creates the acts of men by creating in men the power to do each act – the doctrine of 'acquisition' or kasb; whereas, the Mu'taziles insist on the reality of choice in human activity A Muslim committed a wrong deed remains a Muslim but liable to punishment in the Fire; whereas the Mu'taziles hold that wrong-doing is not a matter of religion (the doctrine of al-manzilabayn al-manzilatayn) Eschatological features,such as the Basin, the Bridge, the Balance and intercession by Muhammad, are real; but these are denied by the Mu'taziles.
According to Neo-Platonist doctrine of Plotinus, the universe and man emanate from God and return back to God. The path to God has tow directions on a ladder: on a descending ladder: Step 1 represents the souls; Step 2 represents animals and Step 3 represents matter; whereas on an ascending side, Step 1 is understending, Step 2 is deduction, and Step 3 is mysticism through ecstasy.
You do not fit words for describing the reality but amplify the idea through exploration/contemplationPhilosophy is to sense for inspiration, revelation, guessTo do philosophy is to act like a prophet but man gathers light step-by-step and enhances towards itOne step of revelation takes towards another stepThe world of meaning cannot be reached simply by words, but man can only reach it on his own, where philosophy just is just helpful in showing the way.There is no body or soul and the body like all matter is dark but as this body journeys towards light, it enhances and then becomes illuminated