Because young attorney allen continues to flagrantly violate ethics laws

3. The ‘pattern of lying’ in the Balita/Beirne
organization once more came to the fore during
a court-ordered deposition of Atty James G.
Beirne’s staff member Ruby Sexon conducted by
Atty Joel Bander in connection with the
Duldulao family lawsuit.
In this lawsuit, the Duldulaos seek unspecified
damages against Atty James G. Beirne and the
Law Offices of James G. Beirne, due to the loss
of their home in Eagle Rock, California, after
Beirne failed to file a bankruptcy petition in
their behalf even though they had paid the
attorney the fee that he had demanded. Beirne
admits that Sexon is the only law office staff
member to ever speak to the Duldulaos before
he failed to file their bankruptcy thus losing
their home.

4. Sexon has been prominently promoted as a key Beirne staff member in
earlier advertising.
PinoyWatchDog.com is inviting all its readers to watch portions of the
videotaped deposition of Ms. Sexon to disprove its claims that she lied
through her teeth answering almost all of the questions asked by Atty
Bander in the presence of their defense attorney, Jack Lapedis.
The independent videographer officially taping the court ordered deposition
commented that Ms. Sexon couldn’t have been telling the truth. He
perceived she would put her head down every time she was lying.

5. PinoyWatchDog.com is saying, without any reservations, that Ms Sexon
is factually lying in the portions of the videotape that can be seen on our
website. This is not an opinion, but a statement of fact. PWD is
encouraging its readers to watch the video
at www.pinoywatchdog.com to validate this claim.
Atty Bander has been seeking to depose Ms Sexon for more than four
months, but she continued to avoid deposition based of the stalling
tactics of Beirne’s attorney. But finally Judge Susanna Bruguera had
enough and ordered the deposition to proceed.
Ms. Sexon’s testimony that she had worked with Atty Beirne for more
than 10 years was unable to state a year, or even estimate the year
when she began working there. One Filipino who asked not to be
identified stated “Filipinos are always filled with pride when they have
worked many years for an employer. It makes no sense she would not
know when she started.”

6. Sexon was also unable to identify her
colleagues’s job description, stating
that they ‘worked in the back’ and
she did not know. Even though she
has been working with Beirne
General Manager Anthony Allen for
about 15 years she even testified not
knowing his job functions, beyond
being seen in ‘accounting.’
Sadly, after all those years Ms. Sexon,
working on Filipinos bankruptcy
cases, did not remember a single time
being trained in bankruptcy law.

7. In the Duldulao lawsuit Sexon was the only Beirne staffer to ever talk or
interact with the plaintiffs before they lost their home. But she did not
know anyone but Beirne who worked on the Duldulaos’ case, and that
the attorney allegedly assigned tasks to people ‘in the back room.’
She also testified that there is no system to track incoming documents
(she does not know of any), and just give the paper to the proper
persons. Ms. Sexon said that she did not remember having received a
notice of default from (Diosdado) Duldulao, even though it is in the file;
there was no record of when it was received. This can all be seen on the
video on line.

8. Sexon’s court-ordered videotaped testimony had a chorus of ‘I did not
recall’, including receiving a call from Mr. Duldulao in September 2009
about receiving a short sale notice to stop a foreclosure; that she told
Mr. Duldulao the bankruptcy petition had already been filed, whether
she was upset that the house was foreclosed upon or that she even
spoke with Atty Beirne about Duldulao’s house being foreclosed. This
should be particularly disturbing to all Filipinos, because Attorney Berine
admits she was the only communication point between himself and the
Duldulaos.
Ms. Sexon testified that when Mr. Duldulao came in she said “Beirne
had to make sure he (Duldulao) qualified for a Chapter 13” but case
documents indicate she took the Duldulaos’ money on that first visit
anyway.

9. Ms. Sexon is the same Beirne staff member involved in the Pecaoco
couple bankruptcy filing mess covered in prior editions of
PinoyWatchDog.com , and in yet another pending legal malpractice
court case of De los Cientos v. Beirne.
In the Pecacoco case a federal bankruptcy judge called Beirne’s filing ‘a
mess’ and dismissed her case, providing only a partial refund. That case
was also handled by Ruby Sexon. In the De los Cientos case, the court
file indicates that Ms. Sexon instructed the plaintiff to withdraw
pension money and stop working a second job. But again, Beirne Law
Office never filed the bankruptcy petition either.
The complaint in the De Los Cientos case states that Beirne has “a law
firm business model that steers clients away from the only attorney
tangentially involved in the practice and almost completely depends on
the use of legal assistants. The involvement of attorneys in client cases
is almost non-existent as a matter of predetermined design.

10. In this plaintiff’s case, and following this business model, Ruby
Sexon, a legal assistant with no formal legal training, and upon
information and belief, an alleged illegal alien, almost exclusively
handled plaintiff’s case on behalf of defendants.”
With no training or system to keep track of documents, this is a
receipe for disaster. And because of these lies and deceit the
Duldulaos lost their home.
Go to goo.gl/uGdlW to watch the Ruby Sexon Deposition Footage.