SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 16
Mantra for Entrepreneurial Project Management 
Subhajit Bhattacharya 
IT Project Delivery Manager 
Accenture
Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite 
1 | P a g e 
(CPOPS) 
Theme: National Conference 
Sub-Theme: Mantra for Entrepreneurial Project Management 
Keywords: Prototype model as managed services, Cloud Service
2 | P a g e 
Abstract 
Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite (CPOPS) is a holistic approach wherein the product or service 
concept is prototyped on the PMAAS (Project Management as a Service) framework. The objective 
behind this approach is to leverage the entrepreneurial thought from concept to implementation by 
prototyping the deliverables and managing them in a cost effective manner with minimal risk. 
Usually entrepreneurs have to cover a number of milestones to bring their ideas into actual 
implementation in the live environment. Each of these milestones can be termed as the phases. The 
tasks defined within them are the process groups of project management life cycle. Together they 
represent storyboards. 
These tasks are further clubbed into agile framework wherein strategic iterated waterfall model is 
implemented to handle the challenges and risks in a flip-flop notion. These loosely coupled tasks can 
continuously communicate among themselves over a standard service architecture model to keep the 
phases running optimally and to yield correct result on completion. The most attractive thing is their 
independent cloud based agile nature.If a task goes wrong, we can plug it out and plug-in another task 
into the cloud socket without affecting the overall process framework. 
As an entrepreneur, setting up an internal PMO is comparatively costly affair and therefore CPOPS suite 
can be an alternative approach to enhance overall productivity. 
This helps an entrepreneur to focus on the actual deliverable and can effectively manage independent 
PM stuffs in the cost effective manner by having periodic customized burn down reports for making 
business decisions.
3 | P a g e 
Contents 
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 
2. Why CPOPS & its origin ........................................................................................................................ 5 
3. HealthCare.gov failed despite agile practices – A Case Study ............................................................. 9 
4. Key Challenges ................................................................................................................................... 10 
5. Methodology/process followed ............................................................................................................ 11 
6. Critical success factor ......................................................................................................................... 13 
7. Quantified benefits to business ........................................................................................................... 13 
8. Lessons learnt ..................................................................................................................................... 14 
9. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 15 
10. References ...................................................................................................................................... 15
4 | P a g e 
1. Introduction 
Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite (CPOPS) is a holistic approach wherein the product or service 
concept is prototyped on the PMAAS (Project Management as a Service) framework. 
This approach can leverage the entrepreneurial thought from concept to implementation by prototyping 
the deliverables and managing them on a cost effective manner with minimal risk. 
While developing a new product or introducing a novel service, entrepreneurs have to prepare a plan with 
a number of milestones to bring their ideas from concept to actual implementation in the live environment. 
Due to the complexities and lack of in-house skilled project management team or budget constraint, often 
it becomes difficult and unmanageable to yield a successful result. To cope up with this situation, CPOP 
model has been introduced. 
CPOP intelligently manages each project phase as an autonomous project which can be dealt 
withdistinctive cloud consultants. At the core, each project phase follows a prototype model, wherein 
progressive iteration happens on the basis of user feedback on partial delivery till the final product or 
service isdelivered. 
To further manage the phases, they are wrapped over an agile framework wherein tasks under each 
phase along with the process groups are clubbed strategically to form a story board and further they are 
decomposed into sub-tasks called story points which are assigned attainable scope and timeline. Being 
agile in nature, each of the phases can be reviewed and managed closely by the project manager or the 
entrepreneur. To make this approach more strategic, a hybrid development model has been 
implantedover the sub-tasks. This enables better problem analysis and decision making capabilities. 
Each of the phases is loosely coupled with others. They continuously communicate among themselves 
and transfer information to their subsequent phases. A cloud based service oriented architecture acts as 
a backbone to make these phases operational. 
These tasks are further clubbed into agile framework wherein strategic iterated waterfall model is 
implemented to handle the challenges and risks in a flip-flop notion. These loosely coupled tasks can 
continuously communicate among themselves over a standard service oriented architecture model to 
keep the phases running optimally and synchronized on a common platform. The most attractive thing is
their independent cloud based agile nature, if any sub-taskhas to be deprioritized, we can plug it out and 
plugin the required one in the cloud socket without affecting the overall process framework. 
This approach can accelerate overall productivity and higher ROI.This also helps an entrepreneur or 
organization to focus on the actual deliverable without much focusing onto the project management and 
development activities. Hence it gives a flavor of abstraction along with virtualization. 
5 | P a g e 
2. Why CPOPS & its origin 
Due to emergence of new technologies and hugecompetitionfor survival in the global market, today 
companies and entrepreneurs are coming up with innovative service lines and products to serve existing 
and prospective clients with the state of the art solutions. However due to lack of in-house project 
management capability or other constraint, they often face challenges to make their concept operational 
into the live environment. Often they opt for “Proof of Concept” model to gather user feedback and to 
further improve the product/service but due to missing standard protocols and huge competition, it 
becomes difficult to incorporate user feedback to release the final product in the limited timeframe. 
Sometimes to gain more focus, companies/entrepreneurs try to incorporate some leading features into 
one solution. However due to lack of marketing and branding teams, these are not promoted and 
evaluated correctly by the end users and they continue with the product for which they have developed 
certain comfort zone and therefore the new product does not receive an overwhelming response. 
To overcome this situation, CPOP suite has been introduced. It primarily works on four principles: 
1. Holistic project management over PMAAS framework 
2. Project driven on agile platform, however each of the project components follows iterated 
waterfall model inside to produce a quality solution 
3. Project development follows prototype model until final delivery 
4. During the project development cycle, market research bodies continuously feed knowledge data 
to CPOP model, so that end solution should be user friendly and pioneering in the global context 
The key behind the CPOP framework is to bring down the project management and development 
complexityto enable the entrepreneur or the organization to primarily focus ontheir line of 
businesses,while project management component is managed by cloud consultants. Each of the phases 
follows the agile model to further decompose the tasks into manageable sub-task components also called 
story points. In turn each story pointfollows iterated waterfall model inside to further clarify and purify the 
requirements to harvest quality deliverables.
Entrepreneur or project manager can closely monitor each of the phases along with the cloud consultants 
to keep track on the progress and can make expert decisions to produce a world class solution. 
6 | P a g e
7 | P a g e
Fig 2.1: In the above CPOP framework, we can see there are three major layers. PMAAS suite 
works at the top which takes care of each of the phases and identifies the tasks and prepares the 
deliverables. To get the tasks scheduled for delivery, phases are further considered as 
autonomous projects which follows hybrid model fusing prototype and waterfall models to better 
analyze the requirements and plan the deliverablesas sub-tasks. 
CPOP is ideally driven by Market Researchers who constantly feed information to the cloud 
consultants to prepare a strategic plan to get the product/service a firm recognition among the 
users. 
Each phase is wrapped over an agile model; therefore it follows the agile principle to decompose 
the tasks into manageable sub-taskcomponents or story points and assigned attainablescope and 
timeline. A daily review is performed until the release of the actual deliverable. 
Project manager performs an interfacing role between internal and external stakeholders and 
communicates relevant information. 
Most importantly each phase sprint has a distinct set of tasks which are executed on a prototype 
model wrapped over an agile suite. Therefore incase the entrepreneur or the project manager 
wantsto re-prioritize the task as per the given requirement or business need, then it can very well 
be plugged out and the required one can be plugged in. This is managed in the second layer. 
Once the components are released, it goes through strategic marketing team who ensures 
marketing and branding of the product in the global market. 
8 | P a g e 
CPOP suite enables virtualization and scalability on demand basis.
Fig 2.2: In CPOP model, project requirements are decomposed into tasks and tasks are further 
decomposed into sub-tasks which can very well be prioritized and plugged-in and plugged-out 
into the cloud based project development and management socket. This behavior enables the 
program manager to make optimal decision on need basis. 
3. HealthCare.gov failed despite agile practices– A Case Study 
(Source:http://gcn.com/blogs/reality-check/2013/11/healthcare-agile.aspx) 
Many websites including the New Yorker, Washington Post and MedCity News have declared that 
HealthCare.gov would not have failed if it had just used “modern” software practices, called agile 
development model, just like commercial companies do. 
In contrary agile model was implementedwhile developing HealthCare.gov project as the developers have 
defined sprints, user stories and incremental test plans — all these are essentially trademarks of an agile 
process. A sprint is a fixed duration of time (normally a fortnight) where specific work is completed. A user 
story is a short description of a feature from the end-user’s perspective that follows this template: “As a 
<type of user> I want <to perform some task> so that I can <achieve some goal/benefit/value>”. 
The bottom line is that those people, who claimed that all would be well if HealthCare.gov had used an 
agile process, are wrong. The reality is that the developers did use agile, and the project failed miserably. 
9 | P a g e
10 | P a g e 
4. Key Challenges 
Although the agile model was incorporated for the development of HealthCare.gov, it was a failure 
attempt. Agile is undoubtedly most renowned and successful model to enable planned application 
development within given timeframe, however there are other key points that should be taken care of 
while managing or developing complex and large projects. 
Key challenges due to which the project failed, could be: 
 Requirements clarification: Due to lack of initial requirement clarification and irregular 
reviewapplication could not get success. The objective is to prepare a systems requirement 
document and then to further decompose those system requirements into software and hardware 
requirements under a matured protocol. This might not have been done properly. 
 Inappropriate development model: Agile, indeed, is one of the most farfetched development 
modelswhichhave simplified the software development and delivery processes; however there 
are instances when two or more models might need to be fusedlogically to produce a quality 
output. This handshaking was missing in this case. 
 Insufficient test plan:Precise test plan was not prepared. All the test cases might not have been 
consideredwhile drafting the test plans covering unit testing, component testing, system testing, 
incremental testing, usability testing, etc. 
 Inadequate project plan: As the requirements were not clear and the development model was 
not viable enough, therefore overall project plan could not bring correct solution. It might happen 
that proper due diligence was not done with the key stakeholders prior to kick off the development 
activity. 
 All at one go:Planning to develop and on-board the application in single instance without 
measuring the complexities and challenges can lead to a major mishap. Perhaps this is what 
happened in this case as well. 
 Weak project management: There must have been a major dodge in the project management 
plan from requirement analysis to prepare the project charter and preparing the final project plan. 
Lag in communication among the stakeholders and flawin risk mitigation plan could have led this 
project into disaster. Although agile principles were adhered, improper plan and management 
could not yield a successful result. 
 Improper coordination among pre-sales and marketing teams:Pre-sales team plays major 
role while identifying the market requirements and target user segment. Post release marketing 
teams help to promote the product and services in the market. If the management team is not 
holistically aligned with the respective teams, it can impact overall product sustainability in the 
market.
11 | P a g e 
5. Methodology/process followed 
In the above case study, we have found a number ofkey challenges and dependencies behind the failure 
of HealthCare.gov. If we try to frame the above scenario underCPOP model and segregate project 
manager’s roles, it may bring some quantifiable results. 
Here we may figure out belowfive major road blocks: 
1) No adequate market research done due to which actual requirements never clarified optimally 
2) Targeted to launch the whole application at one shot and therefore inadequate development 
model has been chosen 
3) Lack of strategic project planning& management 
4) No or little due diligence done on the project quality and test plans 
5) Lag inalignment with the marketing teams 
Perhaps all or most of the above factors contributed in the failure of the HealthCare.gov project. 
CPOP framework could haveplayed an important roleto deal with the above scenario: 
 Market researchers could prepare a knowledge database by rigorous survey in the specific 
domain and the usersegments, which further could be shared amongthe cloud consultants, 
project manager and senior management team to plan the project more holistically and take 
appropriate decisions 
 Post the requirement clarification, theidentified tasks could be well segregated among different 
phases so that project manager and the sponsor could take a decision around “go no-go” stage to 
handle any future risks proactively 
 Since the sub-tasks are themselves part of tasks, they follow the prototype model wherein 
rigorous review is done before releasingindividual components 
 Under each prototype model further waterfall model isimplemented to assure further scrutinizingof 
the requirements at micro-level 
 A proper incremental test plan ensures a bug-free and user friendly product 
 Project manager has to keep a close eye on the progress therefore each release would go 
through strict review and should be signed off by the relevant stakeholders before the actual 
release 
 After each release strategic marketing team can plan the branding and marketing related 
activities to reach the target user groups 
 As market researchers, cloud consultants, and project manager work independently,overall 
coordination becomes simple and transparent
 Enablement of Integrated Project Management System (IPMS) tool can help project manager 
12 | P a g e 
to have a 360 degree view on the progress and take important decisions 
 As per the requirements tasks can be plugged-in or plugged-out and prioritized accordingly. This 
is done in the second layer of the CPOP framework. This is possible as the framework operates 
over a hybrid development model. It basically does not affect overall delivery plan. 
Fig 5.1: In the above diagram it is depicted how HealthCare.govweb application could be developed 
over CPOP framework. Market researchers would have collectedinformation by rigorous survey. Based 
on these they share related information to the cloud consultants and the project manager. They further 
would analyze the data and get them processed under the CPOP framework. 
Once one of the componentsis released, the strategic marketing team would ensure its marketing and 
branding in the global market.
13 | P a g e 
6. Critical success factor 
 Proper signed off project requirements and scope document 
 A well planned market research body along with cloud consultants over PMAAS framework 
 Well defined signed off project plan along with thetasks and associated sub-tasks to enable 
phase-wise release 
 Close vigilance during project management life cycle until the final release 
 Vigorous communication protocol (preferably a spoke-hub model for daily review and sharing 
information) must be defined for project manager as s/he is interfacing the external and internal 
stakeholders to manage project affairs 
 Well stated risk mitigation plan along with detailed test plan for each module to ensure quality 
 Self-reliant project manager to drive the development process and take vital decisions, as needed 
 Large set of tasks must ne decomposed into manageable sub-taskcomponents so that they 
should easily be planted over agile based prototype model which further undergoes through 
waterfall model 
 Strategic marketing team to ensure marketing and branding of the released product in the global 
market 
7. Quantified benefits to business 
 SMART project management during the overall project lifecycle in contrary to the traditional 
approach 
 Inclusion of PMAASframework can produce a better result even though there is no in-house 
project management consultants or PMO setup 
 As the project items are decomposed into independent sub-task components, managing them is 
comparatively simplerwithout having a complex plan 
 A hybrid development model ensures quality product ensuring user satisfaction 
 Strategic release of the application maybringhigher RoI 
 As the components will keep releasing in a definite time interval, it will enable the product/service 
retentionin the market 
 Organization can keep focusing on its major line of businesses while the project work will be done 
over a cloud, as a service broker inside a holistic project life cycle management grid 
 Project manager gets a clear visibility of the estimated and actual cost to avoid over-expenditure 
and keep the profitability of the company at par
 With the help of market researcher, organization can very well figure out the priority items and get 
14 | P a g e 
them scheduled first to bring better KPI 
 With the help of strategic marketing team, after each release company can make sure for its 
holistic marketing and branding to cover a large set of users 
 Forecasting risk and preparing mitigation plan becomes easy as multiple units are logically 
working together for the common goal and at the same time they are loosely coupled. 
 As each of the tasks are working as an independent unit under an agile based development 
model, in case of any risk or other prioritization issue the task can be plugged out and the 
relevant task can be plugged in to produce high end quality output 
 As the project management and development are done over cloud, it gives an essence of 
scalability assuring that further development of the product can further be scaled.It also gives a 
platform for virtualization, wherein we get a virtual interface managed by the cloud consultants to 
manage the IT need from project management and development perspective.Overall it gives an 
essence of abstraction by hiding acute technical/functional details and serving project manager or 
entrepreneur with the required information. 
8. Lessons learnt 
 Large projects can be made manageable by decomposing them into smaller project components 
 To introduce a new or improved product or service in the market, well planned market research 
should be performed to understand the current trend and figure out the target customer/user 
segmentfor critical business decisions 
 It is not always feasible or recommended to have an in-house project consultants or PMO 
therefore opting PMAAS (Project Management as a Service) can be an alternative way to yield a 
better solution 
 PMAAS framework wrapped over a hybrid solution development approach can give 
anoverwhelming success 
 Before releasing each component, project manager should have a thorough review along with the 
cloud consultants and the entrepreneur or the relevant stakeholders 
 Once the component is released, so the strategic marketing team should prepare a holistic plan 
to market and brand the product or newer version of the product in the global market 
 If the phases are tied over the IPMS tool, can serve a vital role in decision making 
 As the project components are managed independently under a hybrid model, in case of any risk 
or threats they can easily be plugged out and other component can be plugged in without 
affecting overall project development
 Project manager is interfacing all the stakeholders in a 360 degree manner and plays vital role in 
15 | P a g e 
communication among internal and external stakeholders. 
 CPOP framework enables virtualization and scalability to adopt additional requirements 
dynamically without incurring much expense. Also it provides a high level of abstraction. 
9. Conclusion 
Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite (CPOPS) is a holistic approach wherein the product or service 
concept is prototyped on the PMAAS framework. This initiative has been taken for building an 
entrepreneurial project management capability. Having an in-house project consultants and PMO may not 
be feasible all the time; therefore alternatively we can engage cloud consultants over PMAAS suite to 
independently manage each of the phases as an autonomous project. Each project is further divided into 
sub-taskscomponents which are further processed under a hybrid development model. Prior to identifying 
the tasks, a rigorous market research is performed to gather knowledge database. These are further 
analyzed by the project manager or the entrepreneur. With the strategic coordination with loosely coupled 
internal and external stakeholders, project manager ensures a quality delivery in a cost effective manner 
without slippage in the deadline. 
10. References 
1. James Shore,”The Art of Agile Development”, O'Reilly, 2008 
2. Craig Larman,“Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide”, Addison-Wesley 
Professional, 2013 
3. Scott Berkun,”The Art of Project Management”, O'Reilly, 2013 
4. http://gcn.com/blogs/reality-check/2013/11/healthcare-agile.aspx

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Presentation by jv rao
Presentation by jv raoPresentation by jv rao
Presentation by jv rao
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by suhail qadir
Presentation by suhail qadirPresentation by suhail qadir
Presentation by suhail qadir
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by pavan adipuram
Presentation by pavan adipuramPresentation by pavan adipuram
Presentation by pavan adipuram
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by sathish nataraj sundararajan
Presentation by sathish nataraj sundararajanPresentation by sathish nataraj sundararajan
Presentation by sathish nataraj sundararajan
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by dakshinamoorthi g
Presentation by dakshinamoorthi  gPresentation by dakshinamoorthi  g
Presentation by dakshinamoorthi g
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjeePresentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuri
Presentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuriPresentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuri
Presentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuri
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjeePresentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Pan europa foods - Project Management
Pan europa foods - Project ManagementPan europa foods - Project Management
Pan europa foods - Project Management
Robbi Palacios
 

Mais procurados (20)

Presentation by jv rao
Presentation by jv raoPresentation by jv rao
Presentation by jv rao
 
Presentation by suhail qadir
Presentation by suhail qadirPresentation by suhail qadir
Presentation by suhail qadir
 
Presentation by pavan adipuram
Presentation by pavan adipuramPresentation by pavan adipuram
Presentation by pavan adipuram
 
Presentation by sathish nataraj sundararajan
Presentation by sathish nataraj sundararajanPresentation by sathish nataraj sundararajan
Presentation by sathish nataraj sundararajan
 
Presentation by dakshinamoorthi g
Presentation by dakshinamoorthi  gPresentation by dakshinamoorthi  g
Presentation by dakshinamoorthi g
 
DPPM2
DPPM2DPPM2
DPPM2
 
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjeePresentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
 
DPPM6
DPPM6DPPM6
DPPM6
 
ETPM5
ETPM5ETPM5
ETPM5
 
Presentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuri
Presentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuriPresentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuri
Presentation by dhruba jyoti chaudhuri
 
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjeePresentation by somdatta banerjee
Presentation by somdatta banerjee
 
CAPM Muzette Charles_Week1_Chapter1-2
CAPM Muzette Charles_Week1_Chapter1-2CAPM Muzette Charles_Week1_Chapter1-2
CAPM Muzette Charles_Week1_Chapter1-2
 
SoftPMO Project Management Toolkit for Microsoft Project Server
SoftPMO Project Management Toolkit for Microsoft Project ServerSoftPMO Project Management Toolkit for Microsoft Project Server
SoftPMO Project Management Toolkit for Microsoft Project Server
 
Project Risk Management
Project Risk ManagementProject Risk Management
Project Risk Management
 
Project Management Toolkit
Project Management ToolkitProject Management Toolkit
Project Management Toolkit
 
Business Process Design 2008
Business Process Design 2008Business Process Design 2008
Business Process Design 2008
 
Project Portfolio Selection Model - Voice narrated
Project Portfolio Selection Model - Voice narratedProject Portfolio Selection Model - Voice narrated
Project Portfolio Selection Model - Voice narrated
 
Pan europa foods - Project Management
Pan europa foods - Project ManagementPan europa foods - Project Management
Pan europa foods - Project Management
 
Managing Business Analysis for Agile Development
Managing Business Analysis for Agile DevelopmentManaging Business Analysis for Agile Development
Managing Business Analysis for Agile Development
 
ERP/SAP Project Charter
ERP/SAP Project CharterERP/SAP Project Charter
ERP/SAP Project Charter
 

Destaque

Presentation by rahul ghodke
Presentation by rahul ghodkePresentation by rahul ghodke
Presentation by rahul ghodke
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by namit
Presentation by namitPresentation by namit
Presentation by namit
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by ashish sadekar
Presentation by ashish sadekarPresentation by ashish sadekar
Presentation by ashish sadekar
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Asoke das sarma
Asoke das sarmaAsoke das sarma
Asoke das sarma
PMI2011
 
Kiran kumar guduguntla
Kiran kumar guduguntlaKiran kumar guduguntla
Kiran kumar guduguntla
PMI2011
 
Presentation by ashutosh mutsaddi
Presentation by ashutosh mutsaddiPresentation by ashutosh mutsaddi
Presentation by ashutosh mutsaddi
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by prameela kumar
Presentation by prameela kumarPresentation by prameela kumar
Presentation by prameela kumar
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by dattatraya pathak
Presentation by dattatraya pathakPresentation by dattatraya pathak
Presentation by dattatraya pathak
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by shreyas bhargave
Presentation by shreyas bhargavePresentation by shreyas bhargave
Presentation by shreyas bhargave
PMI_IREP_TP
 

Destaque (14)

Presentation by rahul ghodke
Presentation by rahul ghodkePresentation by rahul ghodke
Presentation by rahul ghodke
 
Presentation by namit
Presentation by namitPresentation by namit
Presentation by namit
 
Presentation by ashish sadekar
Presentation by ashish sadekarPresentation by ashish sadekar
Presentation by ashish sadekar
 
Asoke das sarma
Asoke das sarmaAsoke das sarma
Asoke das sarma
 
Kiran kumar guduguntla
Kiran kumar guduguntlaKiran kumar guduguntla
Kiran kumar guduguntla
 
Presentation by ashutosh mutsaddi
Presentation by ashutosh mutsaddiPresentation by ashutosh mutsaddi
Presentation by ashutosh mutsaddi
 
Presentation by prameela kumar
Presentation by prameela kumarPresentation by prameela kumar
Presentation by prameela kumar
 
Cloud Computing & Its Impact on Project Management
Cloud Computing & Its Impact on Project ManagementCloud Computing & Its Impact on Project Management
Cloud Computing & Its Impact on Project Management
 
Cloud computing implications for project management methodologies
Cloud computing implications for project management methodologiesCloud computing implications for project management methodologies
Cloud computing implications for project management methodologies
 
Power, Gas and Certificates Trading Industry in Europe
Power, Gas and Certificates Trading Industry in EuropePower, Gas and Certificates Trading Industry in Europe
Power, Gas and Certificates Trading Industry in Europe
 
Presentation by dattatraya pathak
Presentation by dattatraya pathakPresentation by dattatraya pathak
Presentation by dattatraya pathak
 
Career implications for the Business Analyst in the age of digital disruption
Career implications for the Business Analyst in the age of digital disruptionCareer implications for the Business Analyst in the age of digital disruption
Career implications for the Business Analyst in the age of digital disruption
 
Presentation by shreyas bhargave
Presentation by shreyas bhargavePresentation by shreyas bhargave
Presentation by shreyas bhargave
 
Fostering a Startup and Innovation Ecosystem
Fostering a Startup and Innovation EcosystemFostering a Startup and Innovation Ecosystem
Fostering a Startup and Innovation Ecosystem
 

Semelhante a Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya2

Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1
Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1
Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Different Methodologies Used By Programming Teams
Different Methodologies Used By Programming TeamsDifferent Methodologies Used By Programming Teams
Different Methodologies Used By Programming Teams
Nicole Gomez
 
Osterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeffOsterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeff
NASAPMC
 
Agile Project Management Methods of ERP
Agile Project Management Methods of ERPAgile Project Management Methods of ERP
Agile Project Management Methods of ERP
lisa_yogi
 

Semelhante a Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya2 (20)

Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1
Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1
Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya1
 
Business Analyst Role in Hybrid Agile Waterfall
Business Analyst Role in Hybrid Agile WaterfallBusiness Analyst Role in Hybrid Agile Waterfall
Business Analyst Role in Hybrid Agile Waterfall
 
ICEC 2014 Linking 6 Phase Project Life Cycle with TCM Framework-Paper
ICEC 2014 Linking 6 Phase Project Life Cycle with TCM Framework-PaperICEC 2014 Linking 6 Phase Project Life Cycle with TCM Framework-Paper
ICEC 2014 Linking 6 Phase Project Life Cycle with TCM Framework-Paper
 
Talent Base: CAPO™ introduction
Talent Base: CAPO™ introductionTalent Base: CAPO™ introduction
Talent Base: CAPO™ introduction
 
Scrum in IT Industry Part1
Scrum in IT Industry Part1Scrum in IT Industry Part1
Scrum in IT Industry Part1
 
Waterfall vs agile
Waterfall vs agileWaterfall vs agile
Waterfall vs agile
 
Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"
Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"
Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"
 
Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"
Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"
Asset Finance Systems: Project Initiation "101"
 
Visual paradigm-leaflet
Visual paradigm-leafletVisual paradigm-leaflet
Visual paradigm-leaflet
 
Leaflet14 1
Leaflet14 1Leaflet14 1
Leaflet14 1
 
Implementing an effective Corporate Real Estate Project Framework in global o...
Implementing an effective Corporate Real Estate Project Framework in global o...Implementing an effective Corporate Real Estate Project Framework in global o...
Implementing an effective Corporate Real Estate Project Framework in global o...
 
Different Methodologies Used By Programming Teams
Different Methodologies Used By Programming TeamsDifferent Methodologies Used By Programming Teams
Different Methodologies Used By Programming Teams
 
Michigan Agile Presentation
Michigan Agile PresentationMichigan Agile Presentation
Michigan Agile Presentation
 
FutureLink | Strategic Tooling Decisions in ALM Engineering: Migrate or Coexi...
FutureLink | Strategic Tooling Decisions in ALM Engineering: Migrate or Coexi...FutureLink | Strategic Tooling Decisions in ALM Engineering: Migrate or Coexi...
FutureLink | Strategic Tooling Decisions in ALM Engineering: Migrate or Coexi...
 
School district gets an a+ in primavera people soft integration by doing thei...
School district gets an a+ in primavera people soft integration by doing thei...School district gets an a+ in primavera people soft integration by doing thei...
School district gets an a+ in primavera people soft integration by doing thei...
 
Osterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeffOsterkamp jeff
Osterkamp jeff
 
Six sigma and PMP: How can they help you togethere?
Six sigma and PMP: How can they help you togethere?Six sigma and PMP: How can they help you togethere?
Six sigma and PMP: How can they help you togethere?
 
A Case Study on Business Process Management
A Case Study on Business Process ManagementA Case Study on Business Process Management
A Case Study on Business Process Management
 
Agile & pmi project management mapping maveric systems
Agile & pmi project management mapping   maveric systemsAgile & pmi project management mapping   maveric systems
Agile & pmi project management mapping maveric systems
 
Agile Project Management Methods of ERP
Agile Project Management Methods of ERPAgile Project Management Methods of ERP
Agile Project Management Methods of ERP
 

Mais de PMI_IREP_TP

Presentation by dhruva sen
Presentation by dhruva senPresentation by dhruva sen
Presentation by dhruva sen
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by shubham vyas
Presentation by shubham vyasPresentation by shubham vyas
Presentation by shubham vyas
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by beebejan valiyakath
Presentation by beebejan valiyakathPresentation by beebejan valiyakath
Presentation by beebejan valiyakath
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by vikas dubey
Presentation by vikas dubeyPresentation by vikas dubey
Presentation by vikas dubey
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by pranal dongare
Presentation by pranal dongarePresentation by pranal dongare
Presentation by pranal dongare
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by anipriya p
Presentation by anipriya pPresentation by anipriya p
Presentation by anipriya p
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by mangesh sardesai
Presentation by mangesh sardesaiPresentation by mangesh sardesai
Presentation by mangesh sardesai
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by Ruchika Wadhwa
Presentation by Ruchika WadhwaPresentation by Ruchika Wadhwa
Presentation by Ruchika Wadhwa
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by lakshmi varagan d
Presentation by lakshmi varagan dPresentation by lakshmi varagan d
Presentation by lakshmi varagan d
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by parag saha
Presentation by parag sahaPresentation by parag saha
Presentation by parag saha
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by vignesh swamidurai
Presentation by vignesh swamiduraiPresentation by vignesh swamidurai
Presentation by vignesh swamidurai
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Presentation by jayanta debnath
Presentation by jayanta debnathPresentation by jayanta debnath
Presentation by jayanta debnath
PMI_IREP_TP
 

Mais de PMI_IREP_TP (12)

Presentation by dhruva sen
Presentation by dhruva senPresentation by dhruva sen
Presentation by dhruva sen
 
Presentation by shubham vyas
Presentation by shubham vyasPresentation by shubham vyas
Presentation by shubham vyas
 
Presentation by beebejan valiyakath
Presentation by beebejan valiyakathPresentation by beebejan valiyakath
Presentation by beebejan valiyakath
 
Presentation by vikas dubey
Presentation by vikas dubeyPresentation by vikas dubey
Presentation by vikas dubey
 
Presentation by pranal dongare
Presentation by pranal dongarePresentation by pranal dongare
Presentation by pranal dongare
 
Presentation by anipriya p
Presentation by anipriya pPresentation by anipriya p
Presentation by anipriya p
 
Presentation by mangesh sardesai
Presentation by mangesh sardesaiPresentation by mangesh sardesai
Presentation by mangesh sardesai
 
Presentation by Ruchika Wadhwa
Presentation by Ruchika WadhwaPresentation by Ruchika Wadhwa
Presentation by Ruchika Wadhwa
 
Presentation by lakshmi varagan d
Presentation by lakshmi varagan dPresentation by lakshmi varagan d
Presentation by lakshmi varagan d
 
Presentation by parag saha
Presentation by parag sahaPresentation by parag saha
Presentation by parag saha
 
Presentation by vignesh swamidurai
Presentation by vignesh swamiduraiPresentation by vignesh swamidurai
Presentation by vignesh swamidurai
 
Presentation by jayanta debnath
Presentation by jayanta debnathPresentation by jayanta debnath
Presentation by jayanta debnath
 

Presentation by subhajit bhattacharya2

  • 1. Mantra for Entrepreneurial Project Management Subhajit Bhattacharya IT Project Delivery Manager Accenture
  • 2. Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite 1 | P a g e (CPOPS) Theme: National Conference Sub-Theme: Mantra for Entrepreneurial Project Management Keywords: Prototype model as managed services, Cloud Service
  • 3. 2 | P a g e Abstract Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite (CPOPS) is a holistic approach wherein the product or service concept is prototyped on the PMAAS (Project Management as a Service) framework. The objective behind this approach is to leverage the entrepreneurial thought from concept to implementation by prototyping the deliverables and managing them in a cost effective manner with minimal risk. Usually entrepreneurs have to cover a number of milestones to bring their ideas into actual implementation in the live environment. Each of these milestones can be termed as the phases. The tasks defined within them are the process groups of project management life cycle. Together they represent storyboards. These tasks are further clubbed into agile framework wherein strategic iterated waterfall model is implemented to handle the challenges and risks in a flip-flop notion. These loosely coupled tasks can continuously communicate among themselves over a standard service architecture model to keep the phases running optimally and to yield correct result on completion. The most attractive thing is their independent cloud based agile nature.If a task goes wrong, we can plug it out and plug-in another task into the cloud socket without affecting the overall process framework. As an entrepreneur, setting up an internal PMO is comparatively costly affair and therefore CPOPS suite can be an alternative approach to enhance overall productivity. This helps an entrepreneur to focus on the actual deliverable and can effectively manage independent PM stuffs in the cost effective manner by having periodic customized burn down reports for making business decisions.
  • 4. 3 | P a g e Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Why CPOPS & its origin ........................................................................................................................ 5 3. HealthCare.gov failed despite agile practices – A Case Study ............................................................. 9 4. Key Challenges ................................................................................................................................... 10 5. Methodology/process followed ............................................................................................................ 11 6. Critical success factor ......................................................................................................................... 13 7. Quantified benefits to business ........................................................................................................... 13 8. Lessons learnt ..................................................................................................................................... 14 9. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 15 10. References ...................................................................................................................................... 15
  • 5. 4 | P a g e 1. Introduction Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite (CPOPS) is a holistic approach wherein the product or service concept is prototyped on the PMAAS (Project Management as a Service) framework. This approach can leverage the entrepreneurial thought from concept to implementation by prototyping the deliverables and managing them on a cost effective manner with minimal risk. While developing a new product or introducing a novel service, entrepreneurs have to prepare a plan with a number of milestones to bring their ideas from concept to actual implementation in the live environment. Due to the complexities and lack of in-house skilled project management team or budget constraint, often it becomes difficult and unmanageable to yield a successful result. To cope up with this situation, CPOP model has been introduced. CPOP intelligently manages each project phase as an autonomous project which can be dealt withdistinctive cloud consultants. At the core, each project phase follows a prototype model, wherein progressive iteration happens on the basis of user feedback on partial delivery till the final product or service isdelivered. To further manage the phases, they are wrapped over an agile framework wherein tasks under each phase along with the process groups are clubbed strategically to form a story board and further they are decomposed into sub-tasks called story points which are assigned attainable scope and timeline. Being agile in nature, each of the phases can be reviewed and managed closely by the project manager or the entrepreneur. To make this approach more strategic, a hybrid development model has been implantedover the sub-tasks. This enables better problem analysis and decision making capabilities. Each of the phases is loosely coupled with others. They continuously communicate among themselves and transfer information to their subsequent phases. A cloud based service oriented architecture acts as a backbone to make these phases operational. These tasks are further clubbed into agile framework wherein strategic iterated waterfall model is implemented to handle the challenges and risks in a flip-flop notion. These loosely coupled tasks can continuously communicate among themselves over a standard service oriented architecture model to keep the phases running optimally and synchronized on a common platform. The most attractive thing is
  • 6. their independent cloud based agile nature, if any sub-taskhas to be deprioritized, we can plug it out and plugin the required one in the cloud socket without affecting the overall process framework. This approach can accelerate overall productivity and higher ROI.This also helps an entrepreneur or organization to focus on the actual deliverable without much focusing onto the project management and development activities. Hence it gives a flavor of abstraction along with virtualization. 5 | P a g e 2. Why CPOPS & its origin Due to emergence of new technologies and hugecompetitionfor survival in the global market, today companies and entrepreneurs are coming up with innovative service lines and products to serve existing and prospective clients with the state of the art solutions. However due to lack of in-house project management capability or other constraint, they often face challenges to make their concept operational into the live environment. Often they opt for “Proof of Concept” model to gather user feedback and to further improve the product/service but due to missing standard protocols and huge competition, it becomes difficult to incorporate user feedback to release the final product in the limited timeframe. Sometimes to gain more focus, companies/entrepreneurs try to incorporate some leading features into one solution. However due to lack of marketing and branding teams, these are not promoted and evaluated correctly by the end users and they continue with the product for which they have developed certain comfort zone and therefore the new product does not receive an overwhelming response. To overcome this situation, CPOP suite has been introduced. It primarily works on four principles: 1. Holistic project management over PMAAS framework 2. Project driven on agile platform, however each of the project components follows iterated waterfall model inside to produce a quality solution 3. Project development follows prototype model until final delivery 4. During the project development cycle, market research bodies continuously feed knowledge data to CPOP model, so that end solution should be user friendly and pioneering in the global context The key behind the CPOP framework is to bring down the project management and development complexityto enable the entrepreneur or the organization to primarily focus ontheir line of businesses,while project management component is managed by cloud consultants. Each of the phases follows the agile model to further decompose the tasks into manageable sub-task components also called story points. In turn each story pointfollows iterated waterfall model inside to further clarify and purify the requirements to harvest quality deliverables.
  • 7. Entrepreneur or project manager can closely monitor each of the phases along with the cloud consultants to keep track on the progress and can make expert decisions to produce a world class solution. 6 | P a g e
  • 8. 7 | P a g e
  • 9. Fig 2.1: In the above CPOP framework, we can see there are three major layers. PMAAS suite works at the top which takes care of each of the phases and identifies the tasks and prepares the deliverables. To get the tasks scheduled for delivery, phases are further considered as autonomous projects which follows hybrid model fusing prototype and waterfall models to better analyze the requirements and plan the deliverablesas sub-tasks. CPOP is ideally driven by Market Researchers who constantly feed information to the cloud consultants to prepare a strategic plan to get the product/service a firm recognition among the users. Each phase is wrapped over an agile model; therefore it follows the agile principle to decompose the tasks into manageable sub-taskcomponents or story points and assigned attainablescope and timeline. A daily review is performed until the release of the actual deliverable. Project manager performs an interfacing role between internal and external stakeholders and communicates relevant information. Most importantly each phase sprint has a distinct set of tasks which are executed on a prototype model wrapped over an agile suite. Therefore incase the entrepreneur or the project manager wantsto re-prioritize the task as per the given requirement or business need, then it can very well be plugged out and the required one can be plugged in. This is managed in the second layer. Once the components are released, it goes through strategic marketing team who ensures marketing and branding of the product in the global market. 8 | P a g e CPOP suite enables virtualization and scalability on demand basis.
  • 10. Fig 2.2: In CPOP model, project requirements are decomposed into tasks and tasks are further decomposed into sub-tasks which can very well be prioritized and plugged-in and plugged-out into the cloud based project development and management socket. This behavior enables the program manager to make optimal decision on need basis. 3. HealthCare.gov failed despite agile practices– A Case Study (Source:http://gcn.com/blogs/reality-check/2013/11/healthcare-agile.aspx) Many websites including the New Yorker, Washington Post and MedCity News have declared that HealthCare.gov would not have failed if it had just used “modern” software practices, called agile development model, just like commercial companies do. In contrary agile model was implementedwhile developing HealthCare.gov project as the developers have defined sprints, user stories and incremental test plans — all these are essentially trademarks of an agile process. A sprint is a fixed duration of time (normally a fortnight) where specific work is completed. A user story is a short description of a feature from the end-user’s perspective that follows this template: “As a <type of user> I want <to perform some task> so that I can <achieve some goal/benefit/value>”. The bottom line is that those people, who claimed that all would be well if HealthCare.gov had used an agile process, are wrong. The reality is that the developers did use agile, and the project failed miserably. 9 | P a g e
  • 11. 10 | P a g e 4. Key Challenges Although the agile model was incorporated for the development of HealthCare.gov, it was a failure attempt. Agile is undoubtedly most renowned and successful model to enable planned application development within given timeframe, however there are other key points that should be taken care of while managing or developing complex and large projects. Key challenges due to which the project failed, could be:  Requirements clarification: Due to lack of initial requirement clarification and irregular reviewapplication could not get success. The objective is to prepare a systems requirement document and then to further decompose those system requirements into software and hardware requirements under a matured protocol. This might not have been done properly.  Inappropriate development model: Agile, indeed, is one of the most farfetched development modelswhichhave simplified the software development and delivery processes; however there are instances when two or more models might need to be fusedlogically to produce a quality output. This handshaking was missing in this case.  Insufficient test plan:Precise test plan was not prepared. All the test cases might not have been consideredwhile drafting the test plans covering unit testing, component testing, system testing, incremental testing, usability testing, etc.  Inadequate project plan: As the requirements were not clear and the development model was not viable enough, therefore overall project plan could not bring correct solution. It might happen that proper due diligence was not done with the key stakeholders prior to kick off the development activity.  All at one go:Planning to develop and on-board the application in single instance without measuring the complexities and challenges can lead to a major mishap. Perhaps this is what happened in this case as well.  Weak project management: There must have been a major dodge in the project management plan from requirement analysis to prepare the project charter and preparing the final project plan. Lag in communication among the stakeholders and flawin risk mitigation plan could have led this project into disaster. Although agile principles were adhered, improper plan and management could not yield a successful result.  Improper coordination among pre-sales and marketing teams:Pre-sales team plays major role while identifying the market requirements and target user segment. Post release marketing teams help to promote the product and services in the market. If the management team is not holistically aligned with the respective teams, it can impact overall product sustainability in the market.
  • 12. 11 | P a g e 5. Methodology/process followed In the above case study, we have found a number ofkey challenges and dependencies behind the failure of HealthCare.gov. If we try to frame the above scenario underCPOP model and segregate project manager’s roles, it may bring some quantifiable results. Here we may figure out belowfive major road blocks: 1) No adequate market research done due to which actual requirements never clarified optimally 2) Targeted to launch the whole application at one shot and therefore inadequate development model has been chosen 3) Lack of strategic project planning& management 4) No or little due diligence done on the project quality and test plans 5) Lag inalignment with the marketing teams Perhaps all or most of the above factors contributed in the failure of the HealthCare.gov project. CPOP framework could haveplayed an important roleto deal with the above scenario:  Market researchers could prepare a knowledge database by rigorous survey in the specific domain and the usersegments, which further could be shared amongthe cloud consultants, project manager and senior management team to plan the project more holistically and take appropriate decisions  Post the requirement clarification, theidentified tasks could be well segregated among different phases so that project manager and the sponsor could take a decision around “go no-go” stage to handle any future risks proactively  Since the sub-tasks are themselves part of tasks, they follow the prototype model wherein rigorous review is done before releasingindividual components  Under each prototype model further waterfall model isimplemented to assure further scrutinizingof the requirements at micro-level  A proper incremental test plan ensures a bug-free and user friendly product  Project manager has to keep a close eye on the progress therefore each release would go through strict review and should be signed off by the relevant stakeholders before the actual release  After each release strategic marketing team can plan the branding and marketing related activities to reach the target user groups  As market researchers, cloud consultants, and project manager work independently,overall coordination becomes simple and transparent
  • 13.  Enablement of Integrated Project Management System (IPMS) tool can help project manager 12 | P a g e to have a 360 degree view on the progress and take important decisions  As per the requirements tasks can be plugged-in or plugged-out and prioritized accordingly. This is done in the second layer of the CPOP framework. This is possible as the framework operates over a hybrid development model. It basically does not affect overall delivery plan. Fig 5.1: In the above diagram it is depicted how HealthCare.govweb application could be developed over CPOP framework. Market researchers would have collectedinformation by rigorous survey. Based on these they share related information to the cloud consultants and the project manager. They further would analyze the data and get them processed under the CPOP framework. Once one of the componentsis released, the strategic marketing team would ensure its marketing and branding in the global market.
  • 14. 13 | P a g e 6. Critical success factor  Proper signed off project requirements and scope document  A well planned market research body along with cloud consultants over PMAAS framework  Well defined signed off project plan along with thetasks and associated sub-tasks to enable phase-wise release  Close vigilance during project management life cycle until the final release  Vigorous communication protocol (preferably a spoke-hub model for daily review and sharing information) must be defined for project manager as s/he is interfacing the external and internal stakeholders to manage project affairs  Well stated risk mitigation plan along with detailed test plan for each module to ensure quality  Self-reliant project manager to drive the development process and take vital decisions, as needed  Large set of tasks must ne decomposed into manageable sub-taskcomponents so that they should easily be planted over agile based prototype model which further undergoes through waterfall model  Strategic marketing team to ensure marketing and branding of the released product in the global market 7. Quantified benefits to business  SMART project management during the overall project lifecycle in contrary to the traditional approach  Inclusion of PMAASframework can produce a better result even though there is no in-house project management consultants or PMO setup  As the project items are decomposed into independent sub-task components, managing them is comparatively simplerwithout having a complex plan  A hybrid development model ensures quality product ensuring user satisfaction  Strategic release of the application maybringhigher RoI  As the components will keep releasing in a definite time interval, it will enable the product/service retentionin the market  Organization can keep focusing on its major line of businesses while the project work will be done over a cloud, as a service broker inside a holistic project life cycle management grid  Project manager gets a clear visibility of the estimated and actual cost to avoid over-expenditure and keep the profitability of the company at par
  • 15.  With the help of market researcher, organization can very well figure out the priority items and get 14 | P a g e them scheduled first to bring better KPI  With the help of strategic marketing team, after each release company can make sure for its holistic marketing and branding to cover a large set of users  Forecasting risk and preparing mitigation plan becomes easy as multiple units are logically working together for the common goal and at the same time they are loosely coupled.  As each of the tasks are working as an independent unit under an agile based development model, in case of any risk or other prioritization issue the task can be plugged out and the relevant task can be plugged in to produce high end quality output  As the project management and development are done over cloud, it gives an essence of scalability assuring that further development of the product can further be scaled.It also gives a platform for virtualization, wherein we get a virtual interface managed by the cloud consultants to manage the IT need from project management and development perspective.Overall it gives an essence of abstraction by hiding acute technical/functional details and serving project manager or entrepreneur with the required information. 8. Lessons learnt  Large projects can be made manageable by decomposing them into smaller project components  To introduce a new or improved product or service in the market, well planned market research should be performed to understand the current trend and figure out the target customer/user segmentfor critical business decisions  It is not always feasible or recommended to have an in-house project consultants or PMO therefore opting PMAAS (Project Management as a Service) can be an alternative way to yield a better solution  PMAAS framework wrapped over a hybrid solution development approach can give anoverwhelming success  Before releasing each component, project manager should have a thorough review along with the cloud consultants and the entrepreneur or the relevant stakeholders  Once the component is released, so the strategic marketing team should prepare a holistic plan to market and brand the product or newer version of the product in the global market  If the phases are tied over the IPMS tool, can serve a vital role in decision making  As the project components are managed independently under a hybrid model, in case of any risk or threats they can easily be plugged out and other component can be plugged in without affecting overall project development
  • 16.  Project manager is interfacing all the stakeholders in a 360 degree manner and plays vital role in 15 | P a g e communication among internal and external stakeholders.  CPOP framework enables virtualization and scalability to adopt additional requirements dynamically without incurring much expense. Also it provides a high level of abstraction. 9. Conclusion Concept Prototyping on PMAAS Suite (CPOPS) is a holistic approach wherein the product or service concept is prototyped on the PMAAS framework. This initiative has been taken for building an entrepreneurial project management capability. Having an in-house project consultants and PMO may not be feasible all the time; therefore alternatively we can engage cloud consultants over PMAAS suite to independently manage each of the phases as an autonomous project. Each project is further divided into sub-taskscomponents which are further processed under a hybrid development model. Prior to identifying the tasks, a rigorous market research is performed to gather knowledge database. These are further analyzed by the project manager or the entrepreneur. With the strategic coordination with loosely coupled internal and external stakeholders, project manager ensures a quality delivery in a cost effective manner without slippage in the deadline. 10. References 1. James Shore,”The Art of Agile Development”, O'Reilly, 2008 2. Craig Larman,“Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide”, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2013 3. Scott Berkun,”The Art of Project Management”, O'Reilly, 2013 4. http://gcn.com/blogs/reality-check/2013/11/healthcare-agile.aspx