Daniel Parolek's plenary presentation from the Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute's 19th Annual Land Use Conference in Denver, CO on March 4, 2010. This session discussed using New Urbanist principles as a model for creating the “new American landscape”, focusing specifically on New Urbanism’s ability to address community design and sustainability at a variety of scales. It discussed a variety of tools that can be utilized to create a framework for change, including form based codes, the Congress for New Urbanism sustainability initiatives, and LEED for Neighborhood Design.
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
The New American Landscape: A New Urbanist's Perspective
1. The New American
Landscape: A New
Urbanist’s Perspective
Daniel Parolek
Principal, Opticos Design, Inc.
daniel.parolek@opticosdesign.com
Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute "
Annual Conference
March 4, 2010
Denver, Colorado
2. My Optimistic Mindset: Wishful Thinking?
100%
SPRAWL
New York Times: Tucker Nichols
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
3. Presentation Overview
1. Three Important Aspects of New Urban Landscape
2. Tools for Getting Us There: Challenging Convention
3. An invitation for Us to Collaborate In Getting There
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
5. A Major Shift in the Way People Live
“I think it’s amazing in America when you drive around and look at new
homes that are being built, there are three-car garages. I don’t think
you’re going to see families with three cars. I think you’re going to see
families with one car, possibly two.”
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
11. The “Missing Middle” Building Types
Mansion Apartment: 6-8 units
Duplex
Fourplex
Bungalow Court
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
12. Small Ecological Footprint
1. Supporting a pattern of walkable neighborhoods
2. Reaching transit-supportive rooftop thresholds
3. Reducing auto trips (VMT) and supporting a local economy by
providing enough rooftops to support neighborhood main streets.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
13. Duplexes
Typical Lot Size
Typical Density
60’ x 125’
12-24 DU/Acre
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
14. Bungalow Courts
Typical Lot Size
Typical Density
100 x 125’
20-35 DU/Acre
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
15. Mansion Apartment (6-8 Units)
Typical Lot Size
Typical Density
100’ x 125’
21-28 DU/Acre
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
16. Responding to Climate Change
“The body of research surveyed here shows that much of the rise in vehicle
emissions can be curbed simply by growing in a way that will make it easier for
Americans to drive less. In fact, the weight of the evidence shows that, with
more compact development, people drive 20 to 40 percent less, at minimal or
reduced cost, while reaping other fiscal and health benefits.
..The term “compact development” does not imply high-rise or even uniformly
high density, but rather higher average “blended” densities. Compact
development also features a mix of land uses, development
of strong population and employment centers, interconnection of streets,
and the design of structures and spaces at a human scale..”
“Growing Cooler” -Ewing
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
17. Blending of Density
Townhouse!
18 du/acre
Mews House!
15 du/acre
Courtyard
30 du/acre
Single Family
9-13 du/acre
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
19. Mansion Apartment: High-Quality Living
Typical Lot Size
Typical Density
100’ x 125’
21-28 DU/Acre
East Beach: Norfolk, VA. DPZ and UDA
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
20. Good Example in Your “Back Yard”
Typical Lot Size
Typical Density
100’ x 65’
14-21 DU/Acre
Stapleton: Denver, Colorado. Calthorpe Associates
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
23. Live-Work Unit
Typical Lot Size
Typical Density
25’ x 125’
14-28 DU/Acre
South Main: Buena Vista, CO. Opticos Design-Colorado Built Green Certified
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
24. Form-Based Code Components
1. Regulating Plan
2. Building Form Standards
3. Public Space Standards (Thoroughfares & Civic Spaces)
4. Frontage Type Standards
5. Block and Lot Subdivision Standards
6. Building Type Standards
7. Sustainability Standards
8. Green Building Standards
9. Architecture & Landscape Architecture Standards
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
25. Menu of Building Types
1. Single-Unit House
2. Single-Unit House, Sideyard
3. Carriage House
4. Bungalow Court
5. Duplex
6. Townhouse
7. Triplex & Fourplex
8. Mansion Apartment
9. Live-Work
10. Stacked Units
11. Courtyard Apartments
12. Commercial Block
13. Liner Buildings
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
26. Building Type Standards: Supplemental
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
27. Appropriate Scale Infill at 20 du/acre
Existing Conditions
Typical Lot: 150 deep x 60’ wide = 9,000 sf
Existing zoning allows 20 du/acre = 4 units
What does 20 du/acre look like?
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
28. Appropriate Scale Infill at 20 du/acre
Inappropriately scaled infill at 20 du/acre
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
29. Appropriate Scale Infill at 20 du/acre
Appropriately scaled infill at 20 du/acre
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
30. 2
The New American Landscape
Reinforces and Integrates Neighborhood Main Streets
31. Why Are Neighborhood Main Streets Important?
1. Import way to reduce VMT and GHG emissions
2. Foster sense of community (“Third place”)
3. Incubate and support small, local businesses
Denver, CO
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
32. Very Similar to Small Town Main Streets
Salida, CO
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
34. Are Your Regulations Killing Your Main Streets?
Jocelyn Caste Neighborhood, Omaha, NE
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
35. Are Your Regulations Killing Your Main Streets?
Hurdles to Reuse for Pastry Shop:
1. Zone: R7-Allows 75’ tall residential,
but not commercial
2. Two-part special use permit ($560)
A. City Planning Board (meets once
a month)- will deny application
B. Planning Board of Appeals (meets
once a month) $1,000
3. Nine-Space Parking parking lot
required for occupancy permit (det.
by # of tables) $20,000 if space
4. Lost rent: $2,000-$4,000 min.
Jocelyn Caste Neighborhood, Omaha, NE
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
36. Why are They Not Being Built Very Often?
1. Podded land use mapping does not allow for them
2. New road networks and design discourage them
3. ULI’s Neighborhood Center= 20,000 sf grocery store and
supporting strip mall
4. Regulatory barriers: Parking, setbacks, etc.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
38. Reinforcing Existing Neighborhood Structure
Neighborhood, District, and Corridor Documentation: Grass Valley, CA. Opticos Design, Inc.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
39. Neighborhood Main Street Documentation
Neighborhood Main Street Documentation: Opticos Design, Inc.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
41. Refining Mixed Use Regulations with Form-Based Codes
1. Encouraging revitalization and preservations
2. Transforming strip centers into main streets
3. Removing obstacles for main streets in new neighborhoods
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
42. From Strip Mall to Main Street
Livermore, CA, Development Code Update: Opticos Design, Inc.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
43. From Strip Mall to Main Street
Livermore, CA, Development Code Update: Opticos Design, Inc.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
44. From Strip Mall to Main Street
Livermore, CA, Development Code Update: Opticos Design, Inc.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
45. Prospect New Town: Incubating Local Businesses
Prospect New Town: Longmont, CO. DPZ
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
46. I’On: Social and Commercial Center
I’On Neighborhood: Mount Pleasant, SC. DPZ and Dover Kohl
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
47. Central Hercules: Several Complete Neighborhoods
Hercules Waterfront Plan: Sargent Town Planning, Central Hercules Plan: Dover Kohl
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
48. East Beach: Social and Commercial Center
East Beach Neighborhood: Norfolk, CA. DPZ and UDA
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
49. 3
The New American Landscape
Clearly Defines and Regulates for a True Rural Environment
50. Typical Rural Context
Towns Villages and Countryside: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council w. Dover Kohl. St. Lucie County, FL
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
51. How to Get to a True Rural Landscape?
1. Realizing that large lot single family does not equal rural
2. Understanding rural urbanism: What it is and how to regulate
for it
3. Rural development should not be suburban development
4. Clustering only works at very large scale
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
53. CNU is a Multi-Disciplinary Think Tank
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
54. Rethinking the Way We Design and Engineer Streets
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
55. First Rating System for Green Neighborhoods
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
56. Making Zoning Default to Walkable Urbanism
“Top 20 Ways to Make a Green, Smart City”
#2 Replace Your Euclidean Zoning
with
Form-Based Codes
Rob Dixon, Albuquerque developer in his plenary
presentation at the New Partners for Smart Growth
Conference, January 2009
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
64. My Mindset: What I’ll Settle For
MEETING THE
DEMAND OF 40%
OF THE MARKET
FOR WALKABLE
URBANISM
100%
SPRAWL
New York Times: Tucker Nichols
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
65. Seasdie, FL, Private Residence: Opticos Design, Inc.
The New American Landscape" The New Urbanist’s Perspective
66. The New American
Landscape: A New
Urbanist’s Perspective
Daniel Parolek
Principal, Opticos Design, Inc.
daniel.parolek@opticosdesign.com
Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute
Annual Conference
March 4, 2010
Denver, Colorado
Notas do Editor
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
Ây
Only at staff presentation
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
Ask audience: How many of you would choose to live here? Do you realize how these places are designed? Implication of density designation= land area x density. Deve says “Get me that.”
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
This typic is ubiquitous in most historic neighborhoods 4 units for two stories, 6 for 3 story is typical
Streets and block Blending of building types: Thouses, mews houses, range of sf, courtyard Pedestrian Mews as exception
Building Types Plans (blending) Zoning
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
One of the things Stapleton does best is integrate medium density building types into nhoods
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
This typic is ubiquitous in most historic neighborhoods 4 units for two stories, 6 for 3 story is typical
Ây
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
And also, the Rural-to-Urban Transect. All of these methods have proven not only viable, but truly successful. Many of the most advanced practitioners are using a combination of the above, as all of these concepts are critical to regulating a good place. But, of course, today’s session is specifically on the Transect. Many to most of the codes we’ve seen use the Transect as either the primary organizing principle, or at least as a base educational concept. Yesterday, in the session on organizing principles, there was discussion of whether the Transect is a “requirement” for Form-Based Coding. The simple answer is no. Geoff Ferrell suggested that the Transect is an educational tool, but not necessarily a regulatory tool. But, the reality is that Form-Based Codes have become successful for quite a number of reasons – they are able to regulate in a prescriptive matter, they regulate critical issues that relate to making a great place, such as building form, etc., – but also because the practitioners that are creating these codes have focused on their usability - making them understandable and easy-to-use. The Transect is a understandable and effective means upon which to organize the regulations and tye them to the Regulating Plan, and, particularly in larger areas - at the citywide and larger scale, for showing how different areas in town relate to one another or don’t. It is a system that people “get” and can be used from the initial public visioning meeting all the way through the final implemented code. Victor, Geoff, and Dan are going to walk about how they have effectively used this tool in a variety of ever-more complicated situations and Form-Based Codes.
And also, the Rural-to-Urban Transect. All of these methods have proven not only viable, but truly successful. Many of the most advanced practitioners are using a combination of the above, as all of these concepts are critical to regulating a good place. But, of course, today’s session is specifically on the Transect. Many to most of the codes we’ve seen use the Transect as either the primary organizing principle, or at least as a base educational concept. Yesterday, in the session on organizing principles, there was discussion of whether the Transect is a “requirement” for Form-Based Coding. The simple answer is no. Geoff Ferrell suggested that the Transect is an educational tool, but not necessarily a regulatory tool. But, the reality is that Form-Based Codes have become successful for quite a number of reasons – they are able to regulate in a prescriptive matter, they regulate critical issues that relate to making a great place, such as building form, etc., – but also because the practitioners that are creating these codes have focused on their usability - making them understandable and easy-to-use. The Transect is a understandable and effective means upon which to organize the regulations and tye them to the Regulating Plan, and, particularly in larger areas - at the citywide and larger scale, for showing how different areas in town relate to one another or don’t. It is a system that people “get” and can be used from the initial public visioning meeting all the way through the final implemented code. Victor, Geoff, and Dan are going to walk about how they have effectively used this tool in a variety of ever-more complicated situations and Form-Based Codes.
And also, the Rural-to-Urban Transect. All of these methods have proven not only viable, but truly successful. Many of the most advanced practitioners are using a combination of the above, as all of these concepts are critical to regulating a good place. But, of course, today’s session is specifically on the Transect. Many to most of the codes we’ve seen use the Transect as either the primary organizing principle, or at least as a base educational concept. Yesterday, in the session on organizing principles, there was discussion of whether the Transect is a “requirement” for Form-Based Coding. The simple answer is no. Geoff Ferrell suggested that the Transect is an educational tool, but not necessarily a regulatory tool. But, the reality is that Form-Based Codes have become successful for quite a number of reasons – they are able to regulate in a prescriptive matter, they regulate critical issues that relate to making a great place, such as building form, etc., – but also because the practitioners that are creating these codes have focused on their usability - making them understandable and easy-to-use. The Transect is a understandable and effective means upon which to organize the regulations and tye them to the Regulating Plan, and, particularly in larger areas - at the citywide and larger scale, for showing how different areas in town relate to one another or don’t. It is a system that people “get” and can be used from the initial public visioning meeting all the way through the final implemented code. Victor, Geoff, and Dan are going to walk about how they have effectively used this tool in a variety of ever-more complicated situations and Form-Based Codes.
Only at staff presentation
Ây
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Building Types Plans (blending) Zoning
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Ây
Building Types Plans (blending) Zoning
Ây
Ây
And also, the Rural-to-Urban Transect. All of these methods have proven not only viable, but truly successful. Many of the most advanced practitioners are using a combination of the above, as all of these concepts are critical to regulating a good place. But, of course, today’s session is specifically on the Transect. Many to most of the codes we’ve seen use the Transect as either the primary organizing principle, or at least as a base educational concept. Yesterday, in the session on organizing principles, there was discussion of whether the Transect is a “requirement” for Form-Based Coding. The simple answer is no. Geoff Ferrell suggested that the Transect is an educational tool, but not necessarily a regulatory tool. But, the reality is that Form-Based Codes have become successful for quite a number of reasons – they are able to regulate in a prescriptive matter, they regulate critical issues that relate to making a great place, such as building form, etc., – but also because the practitioners that are creating these codes have focused on their usability - making them understandable and easy-to-use. The Transect is a understandable and effective means upon which to organize the regulations and tye them to the Regulating Plan, and, particularly in larger areas - at the citywide and larger scale, for showing how different areas in town relate to one another or don’t. It is a system that people “get” and can be used from the initial public visioning meeting all the way through the final implemented code. Victor, Geoff, and Dan are going to walk about how they have effectively used this tool in a variety of ever-more complicated situations and Form-Based Codes.
Ây
Regulate walkable urban places much different than drivable suburban
Regulate walkable urban places much different than drivable suburban
Regulate walkable urban places much different than drivable suburban
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Only at staff presentation
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Ây
Tools to get us there: (have you ever tried to use a hammer to screw a screw? Is this what using your zoning code feels like? Or what working with your City engineers on a SmartGrowth project feels like?
Multi Disciplinary Approach is Necessary CNU as a think tank Challenging the status quo/convention
ITE Context Sensitive Solutions Manual Joint effort between ITE, CNU, 10 years in the making
Regulate walkable urban places much different than drivable suburban
Sprawl is the default-should be walkable urbanism and ruralism
Regulate walkable urban places much different than drivable suburban
Regulate walkable urban places much different than drivable suburban
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Would not be nearly as effective is there was 20 acres of this types
Only at staff presentation
Wrong building type No street and block or civic space framework
NU has evolved much since Seaside: Now almost 30 years old! Come find out about NU and let’s work together to end the sprawl empire