Фальшивая геополитика, фальсификация истории Османской империи и несуществующий неоосманизм Sahte Jeopolitik, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihinin Sahtekarlığı ve Var Olmayan Yeni-Osmanlıcılık Оглавление I. Геополитика: фальшивая наука II. Фальсификация истории Османской империи III. Нелепая беатификация убогих османов, злейших врагов турок IV. Примеры туркменского, анатолийского и мусульманского неприятия османского псевдосуннитского богословия V. Западный миф об «Османской империи» İçindekiler I. Jeopolitik: Sahte Bir Bilim II. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihinin Sahtekarlığı III. Türklerin En Kötü Düşmanları olan Sefil Osmanlıların Gülünç Kutsaması IV. Türkmen, Anadolu ve Müslümanların Osmanlı Sözde-Sünni Teolojisini Reddetme Örnekleri V. 'Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun Batılı Miti Table of Contents I. Geopolitics: a Fake Science II. The Falsification of the History of the Ottoman Empire III. The Ridiculous Beatification of the Squalid Ottomans, the Worst Enemies of the Turks IV. Examples of Turkmen, Anatolian and Muslim Rejection of the Ottoman Pseudo-Sunni Theology V. The Western Myth of the 'Ottoman Empire' The modern 'science' of geopolitics is an entirely fake doctrine which promotes biased interpretations of geographical data out of any historical relevance; matched with colonially forged History, it generates enormous troubles, plunging billions of people into unnecessary wars, endless conflicts, sectarian clashes, confused education, false national identity, cultural disintegration, and moral depravity.

1. Fake Geopolitics, the Falsificationof the
History of the Ottoman Empire, and the
NonexistentNeo-Ottomanism
Фальшивая геополитика,фальсификация истории
Османской империии несуществующийнеоосманизм
Sahte Jeopolitik, Osmanlıİmparatorluğu Tarihinin Sahtekarlığı
ve Var Olmayan Yeni-Osmanlıcılık
Оглавление
I. Геополитика: фальшивая наука
II. Фальсификация истории Османской империи
III. Нелепая беатификация убогих османов, злейших врагов турок
IV. Примеры туркменского, анатолийского и мусульманского неприятия
османского псевдосуннитского богословия
V. Западный миф об «Османской империи»
İçindekiler
I. Jeopolitik: Sahte Bir Bilim
II. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihinin Sahtekarlığı
III. Türklerin En Kötü Düşmanları olan Sefil Osmanlıların Gülünç Kutsaması
IV. Türkmen, Anadolu ve Müslümanların Osmanlı Sözde-Sünni Teolojisini
Reddetme Örnekleri
V. 'Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun Batılı Miti
Table of Contents
I. Geopolitics: a Fake Science
II. The Falsification of the History of the Ottoman Empire
III. The Ridiculous Beatification of the Squalid Ottomans, the Worst Enemies of the
Turks
IV. Examples of Turkmen, Anatolian and Muslim Rejection of the Ottoman Pseudo-
Sunni Theology
V. The Western Myth of the 'Ottoman Empire'
The modern 'science' of geopolitics is an entirely fake doctrine which promotes
biased interpretations of geographical data out of any historical relevance; matched
with colonially forged History, it generates enormous troubles, plunging billions of
people into unnecessary wars, endless conflicts, sectarian clashes, confused
education, false national identity, cultural disintegration, and moral depravity.
A while back, a Somali friend sent me the article of a Romanian 'geopolitical analyst'
about the so-called 'Neo-Ottomanist' trend in today's derailed, gravely endangered,
and seriously menaced Turkey. Upon reading the title of the publication, I exploded
in laughter!

2. First, geopolitics is a nonexistent science or, if you prefer, a pseudo-science.
Second, how can one possibly be 'Ottomanist' or even 'Neo-Ottomanist', when the
historical truth about the Ottoman Empire is virtually unknown, partly concealed,
and viciously falsified?
By declaring yourself as 'Neo-Ottomanist', you guarantee that you don't have a clue
about what you are. You are an idiot.
By declaring yourself as 'an enemy of the Neo-Ottomanism', you certify that you
don't have an idea about what happens around you. You are an imbecile.
Idiots and imbeciles are not born as such; they are gradually produced within an evil
society mainly because of their mistake not to examine everything meticulously, not
to reject everything that they hear or read, and not to carry out an austere self-
criticism every single day.
This is the fate of the people - of those who consider themselves 'Neo-Ottomanists'
and of those who oppose them. This is so because when ignorance prevails, simply
you are nothing more than a feather blown in the wind.These misfortunate people
will plunge into strife, clash, wars, and hatred only due to their delusions, sick
dreams, calamitous ignorance, and spiritual misery.
The failure to apply an austere self-criticism, the fake concept of post-Enlightenment
'patriotism' (let alone nationalism or chauvinism), the false History taught in the
schools and propagated by publishing houses, mass media, and cinematography, the
confusion between spirituality and theology, and the impermissible association of
religion with politics leads people to death in this world, and to Hell in the Hereafter.
What follows is my response to my suave Somali friend.
--------------- Response to a Somali friend ---------------------------
Dear Bischara,
Thank you for your email of 7th May, feedback, attachment and your questions!
I went through the paper that you sent me.
I. Geopolitics: a Fake Science
Please, do not be so naïve as to believe that you will learn anything true, succinct and
worthwhile through most of the billions of the books and the articles that you can
find online or in hard copies. You are living in a fake world; a fake world has fake
sciences. Geopolitics is just one of them.
There is no such a science — in striking contrast with Egyptology, Assyriology,
Iranology, etc. which are real academic disciplines examining the past of the
respective countries / nations / civilizations.

3. If you uttered the fake, ridiculous and meaningless word «geopolitics» before 170
years, suggesting that it is a ‘science’, all the then scholars would laugh at you. But
those scholars in the middle of the 19th c. were far better than, and truly superior to,
those of today.
Only subliminal manipulations make the average people of today to be stupid
enough to believe that there is evolution of species (in the manner it is claimed), that
there is real progress from the past to the present and the future, that people now are
more knowledgeable than in the past, that science advanced from the Antiquity until
nowadays, and that today’s science is 'higher' than thatof the great civilizations of
Ancient Orient. However, nowadays you definitely cannot build a pyramid like that
of Khufu in Kemet (Egypt), and all the scientists of the world are good enough only
to bring about the total extinction of the Mankind (which is not a nuclear war but the
diffusion of Metaverse, a form of Non-being). So, stop considering the modern
science and the ensued materialist-consumerist world as anything worthwhile! It
would be better to live in Somalia before 600 years or before 3600 years than to live
now.
As a matter of fact, without understanding it, all the average people worldwide have
fallen victim to deliberately produced delusions like Darwinism and Evolutionism;
even those, who say that they reject the false conclusions of these theoretical systems
at the paleontological / anthropological level, are indeed their victims, and quite
unfortunately, their thoughts are contaminated (by evolutionist concepts, notions,
standards, considerations or world perceptions) without them realizing it. Because of
this situation, people all over the world stupidly believe that the Mankind is now
more knowledgeable and more powerful, whereas the Mankind was far better before
4000 and 5000 years.
What is the fake science geopolitics?
A vicious and insidious trickery as per which you theorize, presenting things as it
pleases you.
Geopolitics is a matter of paranoia. You need to be paranoid to possibly accept the
idea of the so-called 'geopolitics'. You can see that on the sick and devious faces of
the so-called 'specialists in geopolitics'.
Every word of the fundamentals of geopolitics is an arbitrary aberration.
Everything that you read here is just rubbish:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Geographical_Pivot_of_History
There is no such thing as ‘heartland’ or ‘rimland’
- Would you or any other Somali call, under any circumstances whatsoever, the
coastland of Somalia from Raas Caseyr and Ras Xaafuun down to Kismaayo,and for
50 km inland, …… 'rimland'?
- No, you would not! This would be only an imaginary line, which would not
represent any historical, cultural, intellectual or academic truth.

4. But if you had drawn that hypothetical line from Raas Caseyr and Ras Xaafuun
down to Kismaayo for your own benefit and for the disastrous consequences, which
that line would have on the local inhabitants, you would have then officialized it by
calling it 'geopolitics'.
This is the whole value of the so-called 'geopolitics'. A trashy concept that suits the
criminal interests of the villainous Anglo-Saxon gangsters! The Hell with them!
Do not waste any moment of your life on this mental excrement of 'geo-politics'!
Such nonsense only corrupts the mind with useless nonsense:
https://mackinderforum.org/heartland-vs-rimland-continental-vs-maritime-power-
the-geopolitics-of-the-first-world-war/
History does not confirm the slightest portion of those silly 'lines'
that the Anglo-Saxon syphilisdrew only to confuse others and
plungebillions into endless wars.
Actually, this is what most of today’s average people never observed:
Not one criminal gangster, who postures as a 'specialist in geopolitics', has ever
bothered to explain the historicity of the «lines» that you and others «see» on their
fake maps.
How does all this function?
Backed by big money and taught in supposedly important universities, the fallacy of
geopolitics generates idiotic pseudo-academic elites who, after studying in the fake
universities, i.e. the academic brothels of England, Australia, New Zealand, Canada
and the US, are hired due to their nonexistent credentials (in reality their credentials
damage their respective countries) only to promote the choleric Anglo-Saxon world’s
paranoia, evilness and inhumanity.
There is nothing to help «correct» the «mistakes» of geopolitics. Throw the entire
fallacy of 'geopolitics' to the rubbish basket!
There cannot actually be «mistakes» in a peremptory fallacy: it has been all rotten
from Day 1.
This is the mistake of the Russians, who subsidize big institutes and think tanks like
VALDAI (https://ru.valdaiclub.com/ and https://valdaiclub.com/) to prove the
Americans and the others wrong in the terms of geopolitics. There is nothing to
prove in geopolitics; it is all false from the first word.
Only now the Russians start realizing that the mistake was theirs! And they also
understand that they accepted already too much of the Western fallacy.
So, do not waste your time with the worthless publications of every Romanian
pseudo-scholar! He simply tried desperately to reproduce the same geopolitical
fallacy, this time slightly turning the story in a way to suit the interests of Romania.
Worthless rubbish! You cannot possibly waste your time on such bogus-publications!

5. All the countries, which were detached from the Ottoman Empire, are fake states;
they merely constitute fabricated tools of the French and English colonialism and
inhumanity. Few states make an exception in this regard, as they represent true, real
nations. Nowhere else can one study this so well, except in Egypt! This is an entirely
fake nation of ignorant and blind people who do not know anything about their own
identity, history, past and culture.
When an Iranian speaks about the Achaemenid Emperor Darius I the Great (550-486
BCE; he reigned after 522 BCE), the Iranian feels that he is the descendant of that
great emperor and he is fully aware of the numerous elements of his popular (not
elite) culture that refer to Darius the Great. This does not happen in today's Egypt;
they speak of Akhenaten or Amenhotep III or Thutmose III as if these pharaohs
reigned in another continent and among other people!
Before two years, a US-based Oromo friend wrote to ask me why Egypt does not
help the Oromos achieve national independence in return for the ensuing dissolution
of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and the subsequent cancellation of the Renaissance
Dam. I answered saying that, for this to be done, Egypt must first understand that
this proposal is suitable for the national interests of Egypt, but this is impossible
because Egypt is not a nation first, and second (and worse), the country was entirely
constructed by the French and the English in a way that it would not become and it
would never function as a state.
I ended saying that, in a way, the Oromos are a nation, although subjugated and
persecuted, but the Egyptians never got a proper national education,never realized
what national identity is, and never understood how they have been aptly utilized
(against their own national interests) by the colonial governments of the Western
countries and the evil secret societies behind them.
Here you have my series of five articles as response to his naïve question:
https://www.academia.edu/44839455/Oromos_Egypt_the_Nile_Abyssinia_Fake_E
thiopia_and_the_True_Essence_of_Colonialism_Part_I
https://www.academia.edu/44862368/The_Enemies_of_Oromos_and_their_Deeds_
First_and_Second_Colonization_Jesuit_Reductions_Renaissance_and_the_Historical
_Revisionism_of_Racist_Colonials_Part_II
https://www.academia.edu/44911781/Intellectual_Colonialism_in_Egypt_How_Eg
yptian_Fake_Universities_and_Obsolete_Education_destroy_Cairos_Chances_to_all
y_with_Oromos_and_Sudans_Arabic_speaking_Cushites_Part_III
https://www.academia.edu/44931444/Egyptians_Deaf_to_the_Oromo_Insurrection
_against_Abyssinia_Fake_Ethiopia_and_Blind_to_Abyssinian_Prophecies_about_Eg
ypts_Annihilation_Part_IV
https://www.academia.edu/44995994/Contrary_to_Oromos_and_Somalis_the_Mas
riyin_Christian_or_Muslim_Egyptians_as_subjects_of_the_Mamluks_and_the_Frenc
h_have_had_no_National_Identity_Part_V
Without understanding the viewpoint of my criticism expressed in the above articles,
you cannot understand anything in the world you are living in. You are hypnotized

6. and -like all the other totally deceived Muslims- you live in a fake, parallel world or
dimension of your own.
Now, I have to add that, whatI noticed and understood from the tenures of both
Abdirashid Sharmarke and Siyaad Barre is that, in contrast to the Egyptians, the
Somalis -back in the 1960s, 1970s, etc.- felt themselves very well as a real and
historical nation. It is not only the very legitimate and glorious effort to liberate
Ogaden that makes me believe so, but plenty of other points. This situation is normal
however, because Italy was never a «true» colonial country (in striking opposition to
France and England) and that is why, during Somalia’s colonization by Italy, the
Italians did not try to destroy your inherent national identity – which was very
different from what the French and the English carried out in Algeria, Egypt, Sudan,
Syria, Iraq, etc.
Now, Romania is a fake nation fabricated out of thin air, only to function against -at
the same time- the Ottoman Empire and Russia. There is no Romanian nation; there
are Wallachians and Moldavians — two different nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallachia and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mol
davia
There is no Romanian language; it did not exist. It was fabricated by French linguists,
grammarians, and colonial Latinists, who intended to falsely portray the Wallachian
and the Moldavian languages as the two «dialects» of the hypothetical Romanian
language. In fact, they fabricated a linguistic mixture, and their silly local pawns
imposed it nationwide as 'official language'. It is a very filthy story, which also
involves the occupation of the Hungarian land of Transylvania and of the Bulgarian
province of Dobruja. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobruja
Knowing the above about the 'national' background of the author and 'specialist',
whom you presented to me, what do you think that he can possibly say — except the
lies that he was taught (at home or abroad) to diffuse worldwide?
Remember that, if he ever tried to oppose the official Romanian state dogma and the
orchestrated falsehood of the French, the English, the American and otherWestern
universities, all the doors would be closed to him and his career would be destroyed
irreparably. He is therefore a bureaucrat, a clerk, who nonchalantly repeats the state
dogma’s falsehood and nonsense.
So, if you please, forget it!
II. The Falsification of the History of the Ottoman Empire
If geopolitics is a fake science, plenty of real sciences have also been filled with lies
and misperceptions, whereas a great number of topics well known to specialists
remained concealed and unknown to the general public — only to the benefit of the
criminal colonial agenda.
The History of the Ottoman Empire, the History of Islam, and the History of Modern
Turkey are three sectors of the academic discipline of History that have been

7. monstrously falsified by the Orientalist, colonial academics. The reason for this is
simple:
- if today’s Turks and Muslims know the truth about these topics, they will not
believe the colonial lies, which have been fabricated by the West only to destroy
them — and have actually destroyed them. So, without the silly lies that they have in
their heads, they would not be destroyed.
The falsification of the History of the Ottoman Empire is a multilayered case of
forgery; it involves numerous factors and methods of distortion, namely
1- several historical facts have been concealed from the average public;
2- numerous events have been dissociated from other circumstances, which however
constituted their inevitable consequences;
3- various developments were misinterpreted and their significance was over-
magnified in order to intentionally cause emotional involvement of the readers;
4- positive forces, pillars of the Ottoman state's spiritual and physical strength, were
deliberately depicted as negative;
5- catastrophic institutions were portrayed as 'normal';
6- disastrous oversight, lack of foresight, and other dramatic failures of the sultans,
which brought about the gradual decomposition and the final end of the Ottomans,
were systematically disregarded or even purposefully hidden from readers;
7- false interpretations and wrong assumptions made by scholars were extensively
propagated in order to cause further confusion among the naïve readership; and
8- a 'mythical' Ottoman Empire was fabricated to be 'useful' for all colonial purposes.
In the process, two very different entities were calamitously confused in order
plunge average readers and people in Turkey and worldwide in mysteries: Ottoman
dynasty (Ottoman Empire) and Ottoman Civilization. The two entities are entirely
unrelated to one another.
Quite indicatively, for the time the Ottoman Civilization existed (until 1580),the real
factors of civilization were overwhelmingly opposed to the corrupt, paranoid,
inhuman, genuinely anti-Islamic, and absolutely idiotic Ottoman family.
The Ottoman Sultanate became an Empire when Mehmet II invaded the tiny
remnant of the Eastern Roman (falsely called by Western colonials as 'Byzantine')
Empire, namely the city of Constantinople, in 1453; it was then thatMehmet II got
the title of Qaysar-i Rum (i.e. Roman Emperor; literally 'Caesar of Rome'). After the
inception of the Ottoman Sultanate in 1299 and until the end of the 16th c., Islamic
Civilization flourished in the Ottoman Empire, as it also did in the Safavid Empire of
Iran, in the Mughal Empire of India, in Central Asia, in many parts of Africa, and in
Indonesia. As you can easily understand, in real historical terms, there is no
'Ottoman Civilization'; this is 'Islamic Civilization'.

8. The real factors of the Islamic Civilization were all the scientists, the mystics, the
spiritual leaders of various esoteric orders, the poets, the historians, the authors, the
wise scholars, the artists, the architects, the astrologists (who were at the same time
real astronomers – because there was no distinction between Astronomy and
Astrology at the time, and this was very correct), the alchemists, the masters of the
supernatural force, the physicians,the grammarians, the explorers,the inventors, the
natural scientists, and all the masters of spiritual and material knowledge and
Wisdom.
These people performed and delivered working in several research centers, libraries,
academies, archives, and in observatories like those of Maragheh in Iran (13th and
14th c.) and Samarqand in Uzbekistan (15th c.).We find the same driving forces of
spiritual and academic life later (16th c.) in the Observatory of Ottoman
Constantinople, which was however short-lived since the barbarian mob that
followed the Satanic theologians and the ignorantsheikhulislam destroyed it in 1580,
because according to their silly opinion "Islam does not permit Astrology". It goes
without saying that every spiritual school (tariqa) was a major scientific center too.
The situation eliminated the ominous impact that a marginal theological group had
on parts of the Islamic world; however, this viciously anti-Islamic group made its
way to the Ottoman capital (first at Söğüt, nearBilecik, at 200 km from the Eastern
Roman capital: 1299-1331;second at Nicaea/Iznik, at 140 km from Constantinople:
1331-1335;third at Prousa/Bursa, at150 km from the Christian Orthodox capital:
1335-1363;then at Adrianople/Edirne, in Thrace: 1363–1453)long before Mehmet II
invaded Constantinople.
To effectively hold the Ottoman sultans hostage of their evil pseudo-Islamic
theology, they convinced the sultans to establish an absolutely non-Islamic state
position, which had never existed before in any Islamic Caliphate and was actually
nonexistent at that time in the Mamluk Caliphate (transferred in Cairo):the position
of sheikhulislam. This repugnant and disreputable chicanery turned the Ottoman
Sultanate into a viciously sectarian state, therefore promoting the ultimate
Christianization of Islam. Any Muslim society that has a top religious authority
becomes utterly papal in nature; Islam is by definition a religion with no priests.
As an exaggerated, exorbitant description,the term 'sheikhulislam' was never of true,
essential value in the Golden Age of Islamic Civilization. On some occasions, it had
merely a nominal value, whereas in other cases it constituted an honorific distinction
void of any substantive importance. Among Ottomans, it started being used during
the 13th c., only to become official at the time of the controversial sultan Murad II
(1404-1451; reigned from 1421 to 1444 and from 1446-1451). The reasons for which
such an unprecedented measure was taken hinge indeed on the sectarian situation
that prevailed among the so-called Ottoman family, which was looking like a brothel
whereby every prostitute would fight to make of her son the 'king'.
If kingdoms are known as the realm of discipline and order, the Ottoman sultanate
was the ever moving circumference of nefarious disorder and chaotic wickedness.
Incredibly nauseating stories of divided harems, concubines allying with filthy
sheikhs against other concubines supported by other imams, qadis and muftis - with

9. several foreign powers involved in the internal conflicts of the disreputable Ottoman
'family' (because this absurd mass of concubines originated from different Orthodox,
Catholic, Muslim kingdoms, khanates, principalities, sultanates, emirates and
beyliks) and with constant clashes between the sectarian theologians and the only
valuable and virtuous body of the state, namely the Janissaries (the indomitable
infantry corps) - produced an infernal situation at the top of the world's most
misgoverned country.
The overall socio-economic situation of the population and the ruling conditions of
the absurd state that hosted so many centrifugal forces deteriorated significantly due
to the rising influence of the odious, sectarian and deeply anti-Islamic theologians
around the idiotic Ottoman sultans, the likes of Murad I (1326-1389; reigned after
1362), Bayezid I (1360-1402; reigned as Sultan-i Rum, i.e. ruler of the 'Eastern
Romans' because of his Eastern Roman mother, after 1389), Mehmed I (1386-1421;
reigned after 1413, when the Ottoman interregnum 1402-1413 ended) and Murad II.
About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murad_I
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayezid_I
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmed_I
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murad_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaykh_al-Isl%C4%81m
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sheikh-ul-Islams_of_the_Ottoman_Empire
III. The RidiculousBeatification of the Squalid Ottomans, the
Worst Enemiesofthe Turks
The Ottoman 'family' and the religious elite achieved to indisputably become the
world's most loathed ruling class; there was no time the wretched Ottoman family
garnered the support of more than 10% of the sultanate's population. Even worse for
the Islamic world: further the Ottoman Empire (after 1453) expanded, more loathed
it was. The absurdity of these undeniable facts is meticulously hidden by Western
and Turkish Turkologists alike; this is due to external interference and colonial
involvement in Turkey after the death of Kemal Atatürk.
First, the French 'school' of the Annalistes (academics publishing in the ideologically
motivated periodical 'Annales' in order to portray all historical developments as of
socio-economic and not spiritual of nature) and Fernand Braudel (1902-1985)showed
an extraordinary interest for the Ottoman Empire's commercial relations with Venice,
Genoa, France and other European kingdoms, thus shifting the focus from other
more crucial issues which help average readership identify the disastrous nature of
the Ottoman rule.
Second, Anglo-American Orientalists, notably the Zionist Bernard Lewis (1916-2018),
the real father of today's anti-Islamic 'Political Islam', decided not to criticize
anything related to the History of the Islamic Caliphates (the Ottoman state
included) in the way the Western historians used to do as regards the History of the
Western European Christian kingdoms after the fall of the Roman Empire. This
premeditated anti-academic choice left the then newly created Islamist perspective
unchallenged.

10. Even worse, in Turkey, following Mehmet Fuat Köprülü (1890-1966), a scholar
known for his academic tergiversations, weak personality, political confusion,and
total inability to contextualize facts,events and developments, several Turkish
historians, rather acting as agents of colonial powers, undertook the ridiculous task
to 'familiarize' the Turks with the Ottomans. Among them, I clearly distinguish Halil
İnalcık (1916-2016) and İlber Ortaylı (born in 1947).Their biased publications consist
in an academic preparation for an anti-Atatürk political cholera.
When it comes to Turkish Turkologists and Islamologists, it is true that Kemal
Atatürk was not as lucky as he was with Turkish Hittitologists, Assyriologists and
Sumerologists. Until 1938, there was not one single Turkish historian specializing in
Turkology who would truly express with academic arguments the position of the
founder of the Turkish state about this topic. This produced a posterior confusion,
because many tried to depict Atatürk as Pan-Turkist or Pan-Turanianist, but he was
not.
On the contrary and due to Kemal Atatürk's personal interest in History and
Archaeology of Anatolia and Mesopotamia, there were many important Orientalists,
historians and archaeologists of Turkish origin as early as 1930-1935, and in many
fields of the Humanities, Turkey closed the gap that had been created by the apathy,
the indifference and the inaptitude of the 18th, 19th and early 20th c. Ottoman
authorities. Highly knowledgeable scholars, like the Assyriologist-Sumerologist Prof.
Muazzez İlmiye Çığ, the grand Turkish lady and leading intellectual (born in 1914;
108 years old as of today) and the Hittitologist and archaeologist Ekrem Akurgal
(1911-2002), were the sheer result of Kemal Atatürk's willingness to make of Anatolia
the focal point of the new nation, leaving the old capital to its past. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmet_Fuat_K%C3%B6pr%C3%BCl%C3%BC#Rel
ationship_with_Mustafa_Kemal_Atat%C3%BCrk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halil_%C4%B0nalc%C4%B1k
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%B0lber_Ortayl%C4%B1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekrem_Akurgal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muazzez_%C4%B0lmiye_%C3%87%C4%B1%C4%9
F
Unfortunately, after his death (1938), the founder of the Turkish Nation was betrayed
by Kemalists, Pan-Turanianists and Islamists alike. I expanded on the topic at the
governmental and ideological levels in my article on Kemal Atatürk:
https://www.academia.edu/44743768/Kemal_Ataturk_1938_2020_the_World_s_Gr
eatest_20th_century_Statesman_betrayed_by_Islamists_Pan_Turanianists_and_Kem
alists
At the academic, intellectual, educational, and cultural levels, the traitors of Kemal
Atatürk attempted to fabricate, under Western colonial academic guidance,a fake
story of supposed 'Ottoman-Turkish' continuity. This is utterly false; the Ottomans,
i.e. the Ottoman family, were the worst enemy of the Turks. Kemal Atatürk liberated
Anatolia from both enemies, external and internal: the armies of the French, the
Italians and the Greeks constituted the first menace, whereas the wretched and
obsolete, anti-Turkish family of Osman was the second opponent. When it comes to
the liberation of Anatolia, the pinnacle of the historical process took place on the 3rd
March 1924, with the abolition of the Caliphate,which was merely a tool available in

11. the hands of the cursed family to be used against all the Turks throughout the
Ottoman lands.
You may have heard about the incessant Ottoman – Iranian wars thatruined both
empires, caused hundreds of thousands of casualties, and ruined vast territories of
today's Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Iran for more than
three centuries. No less than 11 wars, which lasted in total 88 years, in only a period
of 300 years! You must surely be as stupid as an Ottoman original to do it! Incredible!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman%E2%80%93Persian_Wars
Quite often, there was foreign incitation, as the Ottomans sided with the French and
the Iranians with the English, but all this demonstrates the shameful disgrace that the
Ottoman family proved to be for all Muslims across the centuries. These wars were
fratricidal indeed, not in the sense that both empires were at least nominally Islamic,
but because the two ruling dynasties were Turkic-Turanian.The Safavid dynasty
(1501-1736) of Iran was an entirely Turkmen family from Azerbaijan.
In both empires, as well as in the Mughal Empire of India, the official language was
Turkic; in all three empires, Farsi was the language of the education, literature,and
culture, whereas Arabic was the language of the science. In this regard, all three
realms continued an almost millennium long tradition attested in the Abbasid,
Samanid, Ghaznavid, Buyid, Seljuk, Ilkhanid and Timurid times.
All the same, under Safavid, Afshar (1736-1796) or Qajar (1789-1925) rule (all three
dynasties were Turkmen), the Iranian shahs intervened many times to save the
Turkmen populations of Anatolia from the wrath and the cruelty of their Ottoman
rulers; it would perhaps be better for the Muslim, Christian and other populations of
Anatolia that the Akkoyunlu dynasty (1378-1503), which controlled the lands of
Eastern Turkey and most of today's Iran's territory, prevailed and lasted to possibly
supplant the Ottomans in Western Anatolia and the Balkans. Quite unfortunately,
with the Safavid tariqa (spiritual Order) launching their own empire, the Akkoyunlu
state perished and the Safavid dynasty rose in power in Iran.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aq_Qoyunlu
IV. ExamplesofTurkmen, Anatolianand Muslim Rejection of
the Ottoman Pseudo-SunniTheology
Quite indicative is the case of the Shahqulu (Şahkulu/ ‫قول‬ ‫شاه‬
‫ی‬ ) movement in Anatolia
(1509-1511), which was terribly oppressed by Selim I; at the time, several dozens of
thousands of populations were massacred throughoutAnatolia, and at the end, no
less than 20000 people were sent to exile in South Balkans (Mora / Peloponnesus). In
brief, the Ottoman family performed a real anti-Muslim genocide in Anatolia. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Eahkulu
Closely related to this fact, the rise of the Turkmen Ağıtlar poetry (ağıt: lamentation)
definitely bears witness to the overwhelming rejection and the strong revilement of
the Ottoman Constantinopolitan pseudo-Sunni theology, absurdity and wickedness
by the quasi-totality of the Anatolian Turkmen population.
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C4%9F%C4%B1t

12. The rejection of the Ottoman family was very well known to the disreputable Dîvan-ı
Hümayun (the Constantinopolitan imperial council); it is from there that the most
vicious and the most racist, anti-Turk literature emanated. The filthy clerk of the
council Hafız Hamdi Çelebi, serving there in the period of Bayezid II (1447-1512;
reigned after 1481), wrote the following libel against the main population of Anatolia
and the God-damned Ottoman Empire:
"sakın türk'ü insan sanma
bir an bile olsa türkle olma
türk eline şeker olsa, o şeker zehir olur
türk'ün başını keserken sakın gam yeme
baban bile olsa türk'ü öldür. "
https://tr.instela.com/hafiz-hamdi-celebi--323568
A rough English translation reads:
"Don't think the Turk is human!
Don't be a Turk even for a moment!
If a Turkish hand had sugar, that sugar would be poison.
Don't be sad while cutting off the head of a Turk!
Kill the Turk even if he's your father"!
This is the entire truth about the worst shame of the 2nd millennium, namely the
Ottoman Empire. More (https://www.turkudostlari.net/soz.asp?turku=18072):
- Prof. Dr. Faruk Sümer, Oğuzlar, Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Vakfı, Istanbul, 1992,
p. 348
- Ahmet Refik, Anadolu'da Türk Aşiretleri, Enderun Kitabevi, Istanbul, 1989,p. 77-78
- Baki Yaşa Altınok, Rakka ve Orta Anadolu Ekseninde Bir Oymağın Tarihi (Ceritler)
{ History of a Tribe on the Axis of Raqqa and Central Anatolia (Ceritler)}, Gazi
Üniversitesi Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi, Yıl 8, Sayı 21, 2002,
p. 211-224
- Baki Yaşa Altınok, Öyküleriyle Kırşehir Türküleri, Destanları, Ağıtları (Kırşehir
Folk Songs, Epics, Laments with Their Stories), Oba Yayıncılık, May 2003, Ankara, p.
91-93
Speaking about the spiritual, cultural, educational, intellectual, moral and socio-
behavioral traditions of the Anatolian Turks, one has to concentrate on the four
cornerstones of the Turkic (mainly Turkmen) Anatolian identity and integrity:
1- the Turkic military epics (notably the legend of Köroğlu),
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Koroghlu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_folk_literature
2- the Iranian epic tradition (an amalgamation of Iranian and Turanian world
concepts as narrated by Ferdowsi, Nizami Ganjavi, Amir Khusrau and many others
in their epics),
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdowsi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahnameh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nizami_Ganjavi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amir_Khusrau
3- the Turkic mysticism and spirituality (as embodied by several esoteric Orders,
starting from Ahmed Yasavi and the Yasawiyya or Yeseviye and going down to the
Mevlevi, the Bektashi and the Safavi Orders), and

13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_Yasawi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mevlevi_Order
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bektashi_Order
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safavid_order
4- the sacred texts of Islam (Quran, Hadith) and the traditional Islamic
historiography, science, literature, wisdom, and legendary traditions.
Of these foundations, the Ottoman family despised the first, loathed the third (the
Bektashi Order was prohibited in 1826, but was well versed in the second (Iranian
epics), and excessively utilized the fourth (Quran, Hadith) for their own illegitimate
and profane profit.
The Turkic epic tradition, which forms the basis of Modern Turkish literature, refers
constantly to the endless Turkic Anatolian rebellions against the Ottoman rulers and
their fake Muslim sheikhs and Constantinopolitan sheikhulislams. It is not actually
by coincidence that Nazim Hikmet, Modern Turkey's national poet, wrote his
illustrious Simavne Kadısı Oğlu Şeyh Bedreddin Destanı (The Epic of Sheikh
Bedreddin, Son of Simavne Kadi), in 1936, about this superb personality of the 14th
and the early 15th c.
The illustrious Sheikh Bedreddin ( ‫ش‬
‫ی‬
‫خ‬
‫بدرالد‬
‫ی‬
‫ن‬ ; 1359-1420) was a Seljuk mystic and
scholar, who in the early 15th c. sided with the great Turanian Emperor Timur
(Tamerlane) against the filthy rascal Bayezid I in the Battle of Ankara (1402). At the
time, all Anatolian Turks sided with Timur against the Ottoman pseudo-Muslim
sultan, because they already realized very well that the silly Ottomans and their
treacherous, fake Sunni sheikhulislams and sheikhs would make of their state a tool
for the Anti-Christian pope of Rome, ultimately enslaving all the Muslim and the
Christian Orthodox populations to the Western European kingdoms.
The absolutely perfidious nature of the Ottoman family is fully demonstrated in the
case of Timur's siege (December 1402) and conquest of Izmir (Smyrna, by far the
largest and most important city in Anatolia's western coastland). The Knights
Hospitaller and Venetian army had invaded the Eastern Roman city of Smyrna in
1344, fighting against the Seljuk Turkmen Emir of Aydin. For more than 50 years, the
cursed dynasty of Ottomans was waging sectarian wars against otherTurkmen
Anatolian Muslims, but did not bother to attack and eliminate the Western armies
from Izmir/Smyrna.
This constitutes an indication of the good relations that some fake Muslim
sheikulislams in the Ottoman court maintained with the Catholic forces and the
papal delegates. But Timur fully realized what was at stake. Thatis why, after
vanquishing the useless Ottoman sultan Bayezid I, Timur proceeded to Izmir and
liberated the Western coastland of Anatolia from the Western European armies.
In fact, viewed historically, Kemal Ataturk and Timur
(Tamerlane)seem have achieved -in the same exactly location-
parallel military triumphs, againstboth the cursed Ottomansand
the evil Western intruders.

14. It is for this reason that, after Timur's death, sheikh Bedreddin led an anti-Ottoman
revolution in 1416; the great effort of liberation from the Ottoman yoke started at the
same time in Western Anatolia {in Izmir (Smyrna) and Manisa (Magnesia)} and in
the Balkans (Dobruja and Wallachia in today's Bulgaria and Romania).It constituted
one very vibrant rejection of the Constantinopolitan Ottoman theological cholera.
Evidently, sheikh Bedreddin's anti-Ottoman rebellion in the early 15th c. was
tantamount to declaration of Turkish national identity. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh_Bedreddin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A2z%C4%B1m_Hikmet#Plays
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_folk_literature#The_epic_tradition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yunus_Emre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ankara
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Interregnum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timur#Invasion_of_Anatolia
https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/ankara-the-battle-that-nearly-killed-the-
ottoman-empire-deb582a62ab1
https://books.google.ru/books?id=9u5WAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA150&redir_esc=y#v=o
nepage&q&f=false
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smyrniote_crusades
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Hospitaller
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Smyrna
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayd%C4%B1nids
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_evolution_of_the_Ottoman_Empire#1389
Many Western scholars deliberately interpret the wars between the Ottomans and
the Safavids (16th–18th c.) as a 'Sunni-Shia' clash, but this is a lie; this is tantamount
to an attempt of viewing History with today's eyes. It is very wrong. In reality, the
Ottoman – Iranian wars were due first, to the well-known and repeatedly attested
Turkmen rejection of the devious Ottomans and second, to the clash between the
Anatolian Islamic spirituality and the sectarian Ottoman theology. The Iranian
Turkmen wanted to support their brethren and save the Anatolian Turkmen from
the cruel Ottoman sultans and their devilish sheikhulislams. As you can understand
due to my previous paragraphs, it was not only a matter of the early 16th c.; it had
already occurred one century earlier: with Timur (Tamerlane)!
One of the consequences of the aforementioned unbearable situation was that great
populations (notably the nomads) had to be constantly on the move; more than 200
Turkmen tribes are known to have relocated from the Taurus Mountains to the
Zagros mountain range or to the Caucasus region and vice versa (back and forth)
during the 15th - 18th c. Coming back to Anatolia after some generations with a
richer Georgian or Farsi vocabulary, eventually different names, and also slightly
modified beliefs and traditions (as per each case), these originally Turkmen tribes
became the ancestors of populations that are nowadays mistakenly thought to be
ethnically different ('Zaza', 'Kurmanji': known as 'Kurds').
Then, due to the Ottoman lawlessness and out of thin air Anglo-American and
French scholars (or German and Russian erudite explorers under Western European
influence or guidance) created the 'myth' of the so-called 'Kurdish' nation.
From the above you can understand that Turkey is by definition an anti-Ottoman
Turkish state, which respects the Anatolian culture and heritage of Turkic and non-

15. Turkic populations; it was created thanks to the War of Independence (1919-1923),
and by definition, Turks have left the Ottoman past to die. Nothing and nobody will
bring it back. Any stupid guy, who may wish to try to revive the Ottoman filth, will
merely fall inside the Ottoman tomb, fully deserving its putrefaction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_War_of_Independence
V. The Western Myth of the 'Ottoman Empire'
Demolishing the modern (colonial - Western) myth of the Ottoman Empire would
take a 50-volume encyclopedia to effectuate, but I herewith wanted to only pinpoint
few critical elements.
Examined with respect to governance, administration,and military force, the
Ottoman Empire had the most defective structure of Islamic state. Shortsighted and
disingenuous, its rulers (sultans, caliphs or emperors) lost incredible opportunities
and doomed their chances to worldwide supremacy. Among the major Muslim
empires {disgracefully called 'gunpowder empires' by the Western colonial forgers
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_empires)}, the Ottoman Empire
occupied the most useless lands (the deserts of Africa and the sand dunes of the
Arabian Peninsula), delivered the most undeserving wars, wasted its mediocre
resources (particularly if compared with the Mughal Empire of India), and attacked
the wrong enemies.
Last year, I needed more than 4500 words to explain (in an article - see link below!)
why it was absolutely pathetic for Mehmed II to conquer the city of Constantinople,
i.e. the tiny remnant of the erstwhile formidable Eastern Roman Empire.
https://www.academia.edu/43199538/29_May_1453_The_most_Useless_Ottoman_
Victory
I will need more space to expand on how Selim I (1470-1520;reigned after 1512)
weakened the Ottoman Empire with his sectarian religious beliefs and his depravity
as attested in the already mentioned civil war that followed the Shahqulu rebellion. It
will take even more space to analyze the disastrous side-effects of his absolutely
unnecessary war against Iran. I must however add that, in this regard, the most
astounding absurdity of Selim I was the inane use that he made of his victory at
Chaldiran (1514).
By uselessly invading Syria, Mesopotamia, Arabia and Egypt (1516-1517),he lost the
chance to conquer the Iranian plateau down to the Indus Valley and furtheron to
Delhi and the Ganges Valley, thus effectively reconstituting Tamerlane's formidable
state from the Aegean Sea to Bengal. This would be the only way to establish a
formidable Muslim state very wealthy and powerful enough to efficiently oppose all
European colonial powers and plans.
Last, speaking about Selim I's son Suleiman I (1494-1566;reigned after 1520), one
should first notice the extraordinary eulogies and the bright epithets that Western
Europeans used when speaking of him ('Magnificent'; basically because of his
involvement with Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire as regards the liberation of
the imprisoned Francis I of France). It is however common wisdom that, when your
enemies praise you, you have to realize that you committed a calamitous error.

16. Militarily brave but mentally retarded, Suleiman the 'Magnificent' is indeed the
person who created the Christian Orthodox 'Russian' kingdom of Muscovy with his
ill-fated expeditions, his useless wars against Iran, his misperception of the situation
in Crimea, Kazan and Muscovy, and his inability to put an end to fratricidal wars
among Tatars, Mongols, Turanians and Muslims.
- Do you remember that Ibn Battuta had stated thatthe world's most opulent city
was Saray, the capital of the Golden Horde (one of the vast states that emanated from
Genghis Khan's Empire)? But who destroyed Saray? Was it the deed of a Russian?
- No! It was the idiotic act of a Crimean Tatar!
Suleiman I's failure to identify the meaning of the second marriage of Ivan III of
Muscovy (1440-1505; reigned after 1462) with Zoe (later Sophia) Palaiologina (niece
of the last Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine XI Palaiologos), which took place
under the auspices of the pope of Rome, meant that he could not even imagine the
back thoughts and the menacing intentions of Vasili III of Muscovy (1479-1533;
reigned after 1502).
That is why, when Suleiman I was about to die (1566),a great rival to the Ottoman
Empire had already appeared in the North, afterIvan IV (known as The Terrible;
1530-1584;reigned after 1533) invaded the Islamic Khanates of Kazan (1552) and
Astrakhan (1556), being ready to expand at the detrimentof the Islamic Khanate of
Siberia.
Even worse, the rise of a northern Christian Orthodox empire as successor to the
Eastern Roman Empire had already become known to leading Christian authorities
in the realm of the otherwise unsuspecting, foolish Suleiman I, as Patriarch Joachim
of Alexandria sent to Muscovy demands for financial assistance (1558), because the
famous Saint Catherine's Monastery (in the Sinai) had been damaged by Ottoman
soldiers! The unraveling of the Islamic Caliphate and the beginning of the demise of
the Ottoman dynasty had already started!
However, the calamitous doctrinal blindness of the Ottomans was such thatit
irreparably condemned them to ultimate collapse and disappearance 364 years later,
when the ludicrous clown Vahdettin (also known as Mehmed VI), the last of all
Ottomans, was kicked in the ass and left his palace to find shelter {not in a humble
village in Anatolia among Turks (as he should have sought) but} in a British warship,
then in Malta, and finally in the Italian Riviera where he shamefully died (1926) only
to be buried in Damascus (under French mandate) with the money that his daughter
collected like a beggar. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarai_(city)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Battuta#Central_Asia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh_Ahmed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_Khanate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Me%C3%B1li_I_Giray
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmed_I_Giray
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahib_I_Giray
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devlet_I_Giray
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giray_dynasty
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_III_of_Russia#Marriages_and_children
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_III_of_Russia

17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Palaiologina
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_of_the_Khanate_of_Sibir
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_the_Terrible
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmed_VI#Exile_and_death
That's why all the Turks shout today: "the Hell with the Ottomans"!
Best regards,
Shamsaddin