SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 23
Baixar para ler offline
UEFA Basic Licence 2012


          Assignment One - Match Analysis
                            +
         Assignment Two - Training Sessions



 Attacking Patterns and Striker Movement

                     Max Rogers
                   maxanalysis@gmail.com




1|Page                                      Max Rogers
Contents

Title                                           Page

Assignment One

Introduction                                    3

Methodology                                     4

Theme Selected                                  5

Match One v Chico State                         6-7

Match Two v University of Nevada Las Vegas      8-13

Summary of Analysis                             14-15

Assignment Two

Training Session Introduction                   16

Training Session Components                     17-23




2|Page                                       Max Rogers
Introduction
This report has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the Scottish Football Association
UEFA Basic Licence Assignments One and Two, which are both outlined below.

Assignment One

      Identify and select one team to analyse
      Analyse a particular strength or weaknesses of the team (theme)

Assignment Two

      Devise a training session to capitalise/improve the team’s strength and weaknesses
      Training session must include; Component One, Component Two and Phase of Play




3|Page                                                                      Max Rogers
Methodology
Team Selected for Analysis

University of California Davis Men’s Team



Matches Analysed

v Chico State (18/08/2012)

v University of Nevada Las Vegas (24/08/2012)



Method of Analysis

Notational




4|Page                                          Max Rogers
Theme Selected
The theme selected was ‘Attacking Patterns and Striker Movement’. This is a key aspect of
football, as quite obviously if a team cannot initially create and then score goals they will
achieve little to no success.

Outlined below is the ‘Moments of the Game’ model which identifies the four universal
game scenarios that a team will face over 90 minutes. The continuous flow indicates that
the four scenarios are always happening no matter what the team’s style of play or tactical
set-up, the score of the game or what players are on the pitch etc. In order to analyse a
team’s attacking patterns and striker movement, the focus is on the transition from defence
to attack and the offensive organisation game scenarios.


                                          Defensive
                                         Organisation




                        Transition
                                       Moments               Transition
                                                                from
                      from Attack
                       to Defence
                                        of the               Defence to
                                        Game                   Attack




                                          Offensive
                                         Organisation




5|Page                                                                      Max Rogers
Match One v Chico State

   UC Davis                                                                     Chico State
                                                  18/08/2012

                                         Stadium – Aggie Soccer Field,
                                                  Davis CA



     1                                        Kick Off – 12:00pm

                                         Conditions – 850 Slight Breeze               1
Ra Martin Del Campo (55)                                                         Tyson Crim (22)


                                                (9) SHOTS (13)
                                               (5) ON TARGET (6)
                                                 (5) SAVES (4)
                                               (4) CORNERS (11)
                                                (0) OFFSIDES (5)
                                                 (7) FOULS (17)
                                             (2) YELLOW CARDS (3)
                                               (0) RED CARDS (0)

   Match Observations

   UC Davis lined up in a standard 4-4-2 formation for the duration of the match (Figure 1). The
   midfield players were free to change positions although this often led to their less
                                                    technically proficient personnel in 1v1
                                                    attacking duels in the wide areas. At times
                                                    their strong and powerful right footed
                                                    central midfielder player was playing left
                                                    wing, which subsequently created a
                                                    weakness in the centre of their midfield.

                                               When they have possession of the ball the
                               two centre backs try to initiate the attacks. The fullbacks
   Figure 1 – UC Davis 4-4-2 Formation

   meanwhile do not advance forward which means their wingers remain deep and are unable


   6|Page                                                                     Max Rogers
to force their markers backward towards their own goal (Figure 2). Another problem they
had was transferring the ball from defence to midfield quickly. The attacking transition was
very poor and allowed the opponents to organise themselves defensively in a solid 4-4-1-1
formation. Zone A (Figure 3)
was seldom occupied by their
central midfield players which
was the reason for the lack of
passes from central defence to
central midfield. The two CM
remained extremely square
and neither of them exhibited
any confidence in dropping
deep and acting as a
pivot/playmaker.
                                          Figure 2 - Deep fullbacks results in deep wingers
The other option for the
defenders was to play passes
into the striker’s feet, who
could then lay passes off for
the advancing midfielders to
penetrate the opponent’s
defensive block. However,
there was a distinct lack of
confidence shown by the team
and although there were
opportunities to do this, the
player in possession opted for
a lower risk option. This
                               Figure 3 - Ball circulation in defence and poor CM movement into zone A
second option was a long ball
played into the opponent’s defensive channels (Figure 4). This played into the hands of the
                                                        Chico defence as their strong and tall
                                                        defenders dealt quite easily with the aerial
                                                        balls.

                                                                UC Davis got their goal from a move which
                                                                was initiated via a striker dropping deep,
                                                                receiving a pass before playing it wide,
                                                                first time, to a supporting winger.


Figure 4 – Striker movement deep and in the channel



7|Page                                                                                        Max Rogers
Match Two v UNLV

  UC Davis                                                                              UN Las Vegas


                                                        24/08/2012

                                                Stadium – Aggie Soccer Field,
                                                         Davis CA

                                                     Kick Off – 5.00pm


     1                                             Conditions – 900 Sunny
                                                                                                 0
 Alex Aguiar (85)



                                                       (11) SHOTS (7)
                                                     (4) ON TARGET (3)
                                                        (3) SAVES (4)
                                                      (3) CORNERS (2)
                                                      (0) OFFSIDES (0)
                                                        (6) FOULS (9)
                                                   (1) YELLOW CARDS (2)
                                                     (0) RED CARDS (0)


                                                                            UC Davis changed their formation
                                                                            for the encounter against UNLV,
                                                                            moving from the 4-4-1-1 formation
                                                                            to a more organised and solid 4-1-4-
                                                                            1. Utilizing this formation made
                                                                            them very difficult to break down as
                                                                            they used a deep defensive block,
                                                                            whilst the holding midfielder
                                                                            restricted the space available
                                                                            between the lines of defence and
                                                                            midfield.

Figure 5 - UC Davis using a 4-1-4-1 formation

  8|Page                                                                                  Max Rogers
First Half

 Zone of Attack

                          In the first half the majority of UC Davis attacks
                          came down their right hand side. This was clearly to
                          exert as much pressure as possible onto the UNLV
                          left-back whilst also forcing their left-midfielder to
                          defender more than attack. They were extremely
                          unbalanced, as the diagram shows, which made
                          their attacks quite predictable.




 Defensive Distribution
                          A1 to B1 – 5%                A1 to C1 – 15%
                          A2 to B2 – 15%               A2 to C2 – 5%
                          A3 to B3 – 25%               A3 to C3 – 35%

                          Short Pass – 48%             Long Pass – 52%

                          UC Davis favoured a long passing game into the
                          defensive channels of the opposing team. In
                          particular the pass in behind the UNLV left-back.




9|Page                                                          Max Rogers
Second Half


    Zone of Attack

                             In the second half the majority of UC Davis attacks
                             originated down the left hand side of their team, the
                             opposite to what happened in the first half. It was
                             unclear as to whether this was a particular ploy to
                             target each individual full back over the course of
                             the game. Again this method of attack become
                             predictable and although they had a number of
                             shots on goal they were as a result of a defensive
                             error rather than a slick attacking move.




    Defensive Distribution
                             A1 to B1 –9%                  A1 to C1 – 40%
                             A2 to B2 – 5%                 A2 to C2 – 18.5%
                             A3 to B3 – 9%                 A3 to C3 – 18.5%

                             Short Pass – 13%              Long Pass – 87%

                             UC Davis favoured a long passing game into the
                             defensive channels of the opposing team as was the
                             case in the first half. They became more direct in the
                             second half as they looked to score first.




10 | P a g e                                                    Max Rogers
Central Midfield Contribution and Striker Movement
From the preliminary analysis conducted during the game against Chico, it was observed
that the UC Davis central midfield players were reluctant to receive and distribute passes to
assist with the attacking transitions. In order to identify their contribution during this game
there was a particular focus on their performance.


 Key Performance Indicators (KPI)                        Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
    of the Central Midfielders                                    of the Striker

       Successful Pass                                 Movement
       Unsuccessful Pass
                                                                Into the channel between
                                                                 defenders
       Successful Shot
                                                                Drop deep
       Unsuccessful Shot
                                                                In behind centre backs
       Successful Header                               Action
       Unsuccessful Header
                                                                Pass/Cross
       Tackles                                                 Turn/Dribble
       Interceptions                                           Shot on goal



Another key aspect of performance was the striker’s movement and decision making. Above
are the Key Performance Indicators for the forward players.




11 | P a g e                                                                    Max Rogers
Central Midfield Contribution
                                             21                                3


First Half Actions                                   10

                                                                     0

                                          Successful Passes       Successful Shots
                                          Unsuccessful Passes     Unsuccessful Shots
                           Successful

           25%             Unsuccessful
                                              5
                                                                     12

                     75%
                                                                              10
                                                     1


                                                                    Interceptions
                                          Successful Headers
                                                                    Tackles
                                          Unsuccessful
                                          Headers


Second Half Actions
                                                                               5
                                             41


                                                     19
                                                                     1



                           Successful     Successful Passes       Successful Shots
                                          Unsuccessful Passes     Unsuccessful Shots
           26%             Unsuccessful
                                              7

                     74%                                              20


                                                     2                         8




                                          Successful Headers         Interceptions

                                          Unsuccessful               Tackles
                                          Headers



12 | P a g e                                                    Max Rogers
Striker Movement


First Half


                                                             Drop Deep
                                                             In Behind
                                 31%                         In the Channel


                                             56%                              Received the Ball
                                  13%
                                                                              4 times from 9

                                                                              Action(s)
      Received the Ball
                                                 Received the Ball            Pass/Cross – 3
      4 times from 5                                                          Dribble/Turn – 2
                                                 0 times from 2
      Action(s)
                                                 Action(s)
      Pass/Cross – 4




Second Half

                          Drop Deep
                                                                                          Received the Ball
                          In Behind
                                                        25%
                          In the Channel                                                  3 times from 3
                                           42%
                                                                                          Action(s)
      Received the Ball                               33%                                 Dribble/Turn – 3
      1 time from 5                                            Received the Ball

                                                               3 times from 4
      Action(s)

                                                               Action(s)
      Pass/Cross – 1

                                                               Pass/Cross – 1
                                                               Dribble/Turn – 1
                                                               Shot - 1


13 | P a g e                                                                          Max Rogers
Summary of Analysis
First Half

       UC Davis played a very direct game in the first half with the majority of their attacks
        (63%) coming down the right hand side of their team. These attacks were initiated
        via long and direct passes (52%) by the defenders hoping to exploit the space in
        behind the opposing full back, subsequently forcing the UNLV midfield towards their
        own goal.

       This direct approach was further highlighted through the stats of the three central
        midfielders. They only attempted 31 passes (21 successful) which indicated that they
        were being bypassed during the attacking transition and were not involved in
        recycling and circulating the ball.

       The most common movement made by the lone striker in the first half was to drop
        deep into space between the lines of defence and midfield (56%). The direct
        approach taken by the defenders didn’t match this movement as they only played
        the ball into the striker 4 times from 9 runs. Although the success rate for receiving
        balls in the channel was high (4 times from 5) it often resulted in UC Davis losing
        possession of the ball. If they had used the deep run from the striker as a platform to
        build attacks they may have been able to work their way higher up the field whilst
        keeping possession.

Second Half

       The approach in the second half became more direct than in the first half overall.
        They attacked most prominently down the left hand side (72%). There was an
        increase in the directness of the attacks as this time 87% of the passes from defence
        were direct towards the striker.

       UC Davis’s midfield trio had a greater involvement in the game as they attempted 60
        passes (41 successful), although again they preferred not to initiate the attacking
        moves. Instead they worked harder to retain possession of the ball before laying
        passes off to the fullbacks or central defenders to find the striker with a long ball.
        They did provide greater attacking threat with a total of 6 shots.



       The opposite occurred in the second half in relation to the runs being made by the
        striker. The most common run was into the channel between defenders (42%)


14 | P a g e                                                                 Max Rogers
although the ball was only received here 1 time from 5. The success rate after
        dropping deep was 3 from 3 – 100%.

Overall, using the analysis from both games, it is clear that UC Davis favour a direct attacking
approach which involves as little risk as possible with regards to losing possession during
long build up play in their defensive/midfield thirds.

They possess a selection of forward players capable of producing a variety of runs in order
to find space and pose a threat to the opposition; however the support to these players and
the predictable approach taken by the team in their attacking transition makes them almost
void. The midfielders carried the greatest attacking threat as they were responsible for 9 of
the 11 shots on goal.




15 | P a g e                                                                  Max Rogers
Assignment Two – Training Session
The objective of the training session is attacking patterns and striker movement, with a
focus on creating two attacking patterns for the team to use whilst also creating greater
cohesion amongst the side during these attacks so everyone understands their role.

The session is made up of four areas which are outlined below.

Warm-Up

       A themed warm-up relating to attacking play and striker movement combined with
        dynamic stretches, off the ball movement and plenty of ball contact.

Component One

       The first component provides a basic introduction to the two attacking options. The
        first one involves a striker dropping deep acting as a false nine, whilst the second
        option involves an overlap from a full back to push the midfield up the pitch.

Component Two

       The second component uses the specific moves in a small sided game (8v8), with two
        teams attempting to complete them. Game conditions can be utilised to encourage
        the players to use the movements introduced via Component One.

Phase of Play

       The Phase of Play is the most game like situation with an attacking overload (10v6)
        to encourage success in the attacking phase. When an opportunity arises to use an
        attacking pattern, but is missed, play is stopped and ‘rewound’ to complete the play.




16 | P a g e                                                                Max Rogers
Warm-Up




Possession Boxes with Target Player
                                                                     Key
 Four boxes are filled with three players plus one target player
 fulfilling the role of a striker. Each box also has one ball.
                                                                     Dimensions – 40x40
 Play starts with the groups passing the ball around their square    Yellow – Target Player
 in any sequence with all players constantly moving around the       Grey – Player
 area.                                                               Duration – 10 minutes
                                                                                2 mins instruction
 On the coach’s call, the players transfer their ball clockwise                 8 mins work
 around the square aiming for the yellow target player who has
 two options – drop deep to the edge of square or make a run
 towards the back of the square to receive a longer pass.
                                                                    When a player isn’t in
                                                                    possession of the ball they
                                                                    must perform a dynamic
                                                                    movement or stretch.

                                                                    High knees, ankle flicks, lunges,
                                                                    side steps, lateral shifts,
                                                                    hamstring extensions, opening
                                                                    the groins and skipping.

 Progression
 After the first four minutes of work a playmaker is introduced in each group of four who is only
 allowed to pass the ball to the next box.


17 | P a g e                                                                        Max Rogers
Component One




                                                                Key
False 9 Striker Movement

                                                                Dimensions – ¾ of full field
The aim of the first movement is to link play via a striker
                                                                P1 – Pass One
dropping deep into the space between the lines of the
                                                                M1 – Movement One
opponent’s defence and midfield.

CM M1                                                           Duration – 10 minutes
The move starts when the centre midfielder makes a                         2 mins instruction
dummy run towards the centre back to create space for the                  8 mins work
striker. After doing so the midfielder turns sharply as the
ball travels past.

ST M1
The trigger for the striker’s movement deep is when the central midfielder has stopped their run
deep.

CB P1
The centre back then plays the ball forward into towards the feet of the striker who sets the ball up
for the central midfielder.

LM M2
The left midfielder then bursts into life, having kept up with play, and begins their run forward in
behind the full back as the striker touches the ball.



18 | P a g e                                                                      Max Rogers
CM P2
The centre mid plays a driven ball in behind the full back before continuing a run into the box along
with the strikers.



Coaching Points


       Movements performed at game pace with a particular focus on the timing.
       Quality passing at all times. Restart move if there is a poor pass.
       Players’ must be aware of team mate’s movements and act accordingly to support
        play.
       When CM drops deep ensure they angle their run to allow a pass to be played
        forward.
       ST lays the ball off with one touch for the CM to strike first time.
       LM must start out on the touchline to create width and space between defenders.




19 | P a g e                                                                      Max Rogers
Full Back Overlap

CB P1
The centre back starts the move by playing the ball out wide to the full back.

CM M2
As the ball reaches the full back the central midfielder drops at an angle to receive a pass
from the full back (RB P2).

RB M2
Having knocked the ball infield the full back then makes a forward run, overlapping the right
midfielder.

RM M3
To create space for the overlapping run the right midfielder is required to make a run infield
before asking for a dummy pass from the central midfielder.

CM P3
The ball is then played out wide from the middle of the field for the full back to run onto.
Both strikers then attack the box and receive a cross from out wide (ST M4 and RB P4).




20 | P a g e                                                                  Max Rogers
Coaching Points

       Quality passing at all times. If the move breaks down restart from the beginning.
       Movements performed at game pace. Very intense and sharp.
       Timing of the runs must be accurate in order to create the required space.
       Runs always made with an angle.
       Strikers vary run into the box to make space. One goes near post, one hangs at the
        edge.
       When crossing aim for a specific area rather than trying to find a player.




21 | P a g e                                                               Max Rogers
Component Two




                                                      Key
Both teams adopt a 2-3-2 formation in order to
perform the moves covered in Component One.           Dimensions – Half of full field
                                                      Duration – 10 minutes
                    The field is set-up with two                 2 mins instruction
                    channels, split into three                   8 mins work
                    sections, on either side.
                    Players are free to move in and out of the channel. However, if the full
                    back enters the channel the midfielder must be at least one box ahead
                    of them. This is to encourage the wide midfielders to remain high up
                    the field and in support of attacks.

                    When initiating the full back overlap move this is not important as the
                    wide midfielder is required to cut infield to create the space out wide,
                    meaning that they are vacating the channel.

Coaching Points

       Perform moves when the opportunity arises; maintain quick game like tempo at all
        times.
       Improvisation is also a key component of attacking, be expressive and creative.


22 | P a g e                                                                 Max Rogers
Phase of Play




                                                                  Key
The attacking team, in grey, line-up in a 3-3-2 formation
and the yellow defending team line-up with a 4-1-1                Dimensions – ¾ full field
formation creating a 9v7 overload in favour of the                Yellow – Defenders
attacking team.                                                   Grey – Attackers
                                                                  Duration – 15 minutes
The ball always starts from the attacking teams’                             3 mins instruction
goalkeeper while the position of the defence, yellow team,                  12 mins work
is always reset to a realistic position before play is restarted after a goal. If the defending
team gain possession of the ball their aim is to play the ball forward to their striker to hold it
up.

Coaching Points

       Encourage the use of movements from previous two components. If an opportunity
        is missed play is taken back and corrections made.
       Players are also encouraged to be creative and make their own decisions when
        attacking, e.g. using the wide midfielder to cross the ball instead of the full back.
       Tempo must be game equivalent.


23 | P a g e                                                                    Max Rogers

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

AW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHY
AW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHYAW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHY
AW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHY
Antony Wilshaw
 
Preparing for competition the method of maurizio sarri
Preparing for competition   the method of maurizio sarriPreparing for competition   the method of maurizio sarri
Preparing for competition the method of maurizio sarri
David Lagar
 
Transition phases
Transition phasesTransition phases
Transition phases
prembic
 
Conference of coaches poznan
Conference of coaches poznanConference of coaches poznan
Conference of coaches poznan
Wojciech Makowski
 

Mais procurados (20)

Soccer Scouting Report New York City FC
Soccer Scouting Report New York City FCSoccer Scouting Report New York City FC
Soccer Scouting Report New York City FC
 
LIVERPOOL FC ANALYSIS 2018/19
LIVERPOOL FC ANALYSIS 2018/19LIVERPOOL FC ANALYSIS 2018/19
LIVERPOOL FC ANALYSIS 2018/19
 
Rondos 141114024833-conversion-gate02
Rondos 141114024833-conversion-gate02Rondos 141114024833-conversion-gate02
Rondos 141114024833-conversion-gate02
 
Scout report: PSV (jan-feb 15)
Scout report: PSV (jan-feb 15)Scout report: PSV (jan-feb 15)
Scout report: PSV (jan-feb 15)
 
AW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHY
AW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHYAW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHY
AW-COACH-TEACH-PHILOSOPHY
 
Rondos - Up Back Through
Rondos - Up Back ThroughRondos - Up Back Through
Rondos - Up Back Through
 
Italian serie a academy training
Italian serie a academy trainingItalian serie a academy training
Italian serie a academy training
 
Preparing for competition the method of maurizio sarri
Preparing for competition   the method of maurizio sarriPreparing for competition   the method of maurizio sarri
Preparing for competition the method of maurizio sarri
 
FC BAYERN MUNCHEN : Osservazione tattica della squadra avversaria (Metodo 5x5
FC BAYERN MUNCHEN : Osservazione tattica della squadra avversaria (Metodo 5x5FC BAYERN MUNCHEN : Osservazione tattica della squadra avversaria (Metodo 5x5
FC BAYERN MUNCHEN : Osservazione tattica della squadra avversaria (Metodo 5x5
 
Rondospresentation
Rondospresentation Rondospresentation
Rondospresentation
 
Offensive transitions
Offensive transitionsOffensive transitions
Offensive transitions
 
Transition phases
Transition phasesTransition phases
Transition phases
 
Conference of coaches poznan
Conference of coaches poznanConference of coaches poznan
Conference of coaches poznan
 
Opposition Analysis 2014/15 - Kilmarnock FC
Opposition Analysis 2014/15 - Kilmarnock FCOpposition Analysis 2014/15 - Kilmarnock FC
Opposition Analysis 2014/15 - Kilmarnock FC
 
game-model-4-2-3-1.pdf
game-model-4-2-3-1.pdfgame-model-4-2-3-1.pdf
game-model-4-2-3-1.pdf
 
Liverpool FC - Coaching Manual
Liverpool FC - Coaching ManualLiverpool FC - Coaching Manual
Liverpool FC - Coaching Manual
 
Jose mourinho's presentation to fc porto (translated version).
Jose mourinho's presentation to fc porto (translated version).Jose mourinho's presentation to fc porto (translated version).
Jose mourinho's presentation to fc porto (translated version).
 
Guardiola 4v4+3 - Concepts of Juego de Posicion
Guardiola 4v4+3 - Concepts of Juego de PosicionGuardiola 4v4+3 - Concepts of Juego de Posicion
Guardiola 4v4+3 - Concepts of Juego de Posicion
 
Pressing in soccer
Pressing in soccerPressing in soccer
Pressing in soccer
 
MANCHESTER CITY FC 2018/19 ANALYSIS
MANCHESTER CITY FC 2018/19 ANALYSISMANCHESTER CITY FC 2018/19 ANALYSIS
MANCHESTER CITY FC 2018/19 ANALYSIS
 

Mais de Max Rogers

Scottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston Villa
Scottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston VillaScottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston Villa
Scottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston Villa
Max Rogers
 
Manchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex Ferguson
Manchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex FergusonManchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex Ferguson
Manchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex Ferguson
Max Rogers
 
Kilmarnock U19s Analysis Report
Kilmarnock U19s Analysis ReportKilmarnock U19s Analysis Report
Kilmarnock U19s Analysis Report
Max Rogers
 
Queen of the South Analysis Report
Queen of the South Analysis ReportQueen of the South Analysis Report
Queen of the South Analysis Report
Max Rogers
 
Motherwell F.C. Analysis Report
Motherwell F.C. Analysis ReportMotherwell F.C. Analysis Report
Motherwell F.C. Analysis Report
Max Rogers
 
The Belgium Vision on Youth Development
The Belgium Vision on Youth DevelopmentThe Belgium Vision on Youth Development
The Belgium Vision on Youth Development
Max Rogers
 

Mais de Max Rogers (8)

SFA Elite Youth Licence Pre Season Programme Max Rogers
SFA Elite Youth Licence Pre Season Programme Max RogersSFA Elite Youth Licence Pre Season Programme Max Rogers
SFA Elite Youth Licence Pre Season Programme Max Rogers
 
David Longwell 2014 UEFA Pro Licence - Example
David Longwell 2014 UEFA Pro Licence - ExampleDavid Longwell 2014 UEFA Pro Licence - Example
David Longwell 2014 UEFA Pro Licence - Example
 
Scottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston Villa
Scottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston VillaScottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston Villa
Scottish FA CPD Event Notes Sean Kimberly Aston Villa
 
Manchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex Ferguson
Manchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex FergusonManchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex Ferguson
Manchester United Passing & Movement Triggers Sir Alex Ferguson
 
Kilmarnock U19s Analysis Report
Kilmarnock U19s Analysis ReportKilmarnock U19s Analysis Report
Kilmarnock U19s Analysis Report
 
Queen of the South Analysis Report
Queen of the South Analysis ReportQueen of the South Analysis Report
Queen of the South Analysis Report
 
Motherwell F.C. Analysis Report
Motherwell F.C. Analysis ReportMotherwell F.C. Analysis Report
Motherwell F.C. Analysis Report
 
The Belgium Vision on Youth Development
The Belgium Vision on Youth DevelopmentThe Belgium Vision on Youth Development
The Belgium Vision on Youth Development
 

UEFA B Licence Assignment One & Two - Max Rogers

  • 1. UEFA Basic Licence 2012 Assignment One - Match Analysis + Assignment Two - Training Sessions Attacking Patterns and Striker Movement Max Rogers maxanalysis@gmail.com 1|Page Max Rogers
  • 2. Contents Title Page Assignment One Introduction 3 Methodology 4 Theme Selected 5 Match One v Chico State 6-7 Match Two v University of Nevada Las Vegas 8-13 Summary of Analysis 14-15 Assignment Two Training Session Introduction 16 Training Session Components 17-23 2|Page Max Rogers
  • 3. Introduction This report has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the Scottish Football Association UEFA Basic Licence Assignments One and Two, which are both outlined below. Assignment One  Identify and select one team to analyse  Analyse a particular strength or weaknesses of the team (theme) Assignment Two  Devise a training session to capitalise/improve the team’s strength and weaknesses  Training session must include; Component One, Component Two and Phase of Play 3|Page Max Rogers
  • 4. Methodology Team Selected for Analysis University of California Davis Men’s Team Matches Analysed v Chico State (18/08/2012) v University of Nevada Las Vegas (24/08/2012) Method of Analysis Notational 4|Page Max Rogers
  • 5. Theme Selected The theme selected was ‘Attacking Patterns and Striker Movement’. This is a key aspect of football, as quite obviously if a team cannot initially create and then score goals they will achieve little to no success. Outlined below is the ‘Moments of the Game’ model which identifies the four universal game scenarios that a team will face over 90 minutes. The continuous flow indicates that the four scenarios are always happening no matter what the team’s style of play or tactical set-up, the score of the game or what players are on the pitch etc. In order to analyse a team’s attacking patterns and striker movement, the focus is on the transition from defence to attack and the offensive organisation game scenarios. Defensive Organisation Transition Moments Transition from from Attack to Defence of the Defence to Game Attack Offensive Organisation 5|Page Max Rogers
  • 6. Match One v Chico State UC Davis Chico State 18/08/2012 Stadium – Aggie Soccer Field, Davis CA 1 Kick Off – 12:00pm Conditions – 850 Slight Breeze 1 Ra Martin Del Campo (55) Tyson Crim (22) (9) SHOTS (13) (5) ON TARGET (6) (5) SAVES (4) (4) CORNERS (11) (0) OFFSIDES (5) (7) FOULS (17) (2) YELLOW CARDS (3) (0) RED CARDS (0) Match Observations UC Davis lined up in a standard 4-4-2 formation for the duration of the match (Figure 1). The midfield players were free to change positions although this often led to their less technically proficient personnel in 1v1 attacking duels in the wide areas. At times their strong and powerful right footed central midfielder player was playing left wing, which subsequently created a weakness in the centre of their midfield. When they have possession of the ball the two centre backs try to initiate the attacks. The fullbacks Figure 1 – UC Davis 4-4-2 Formation meanwhile do not advance forward which means their wingers remain deep and are unable 6|Page Max Rogers
  • 7. to force their markers backward towards their own goal (Figure 2). Another problem they had was transferring the ball from defence to midfield quickly. The attacking transition was very poor and allowed the opponents to organise themselves defensively in a solid 4-4-1-1 formation. Zone A (Figure 3) was seldom occupied by their central midfield players which was the reason for the lack of passes from central defence to central midfield. The two CM remained extremely square and neither of them exhibited any confidence in dropping deep and acting as a pivot/playmaker. Figure 2 - Deep fullbacks results in deep wingers The other option for the defenders was to play passes into the striker’s feet, who could then lay passes off for the advancing midfielders to penetrate the opponent’s defensive block. However, there was a distinct lack of confidence shown by the team and although there were opportunities to do this, the player in possession opted for a lower risk option. This Figure 3 - Ball circulation in defence and poor CM movement into zone A second option was a long ball played into the opponent’s defensive channels (Figure 4). This played into the hands of the Chico defence as their strong and tall defenders dealt quite easily with the aerial balls. UC Davis got their goal from a move which was initiated via a striker dropping deep, receiving a pass before playing it wide, first time, to a supporting winger. Figure 4 – Striker movement deep and in the channel 7|Page Max Rogers
  • 8. Match Two v UNLV UC Davis UN Las Vegas 24/08/2012 Stadium – Aggie Soccer Field, Davis CA Kick Off – 5.00pm 1 Conditions – 900 Sunny 0 Alex Aguiar (85) (11) SHOTS (7) (4) ON TARGET (3) (3) SAVES (4) (3) CORNERS (2) (0) OFFSIDES (0) (6) FOULS (9) (1) YELLOW CARDS (2) (0) RED CARDS (0) UC Davis changed their formation for the encounter against UNLV, moving from the 4-4-1-1 formation to a more organised and solid 4-1-4- 1. Utilizing this formation made them very difficult to break down as they used a deep defensive block, whilst the holding midfielder restricted the space available between the lines of defence and midfield. Figure 5 - UC Davis using a 4-1-4-1 formation 8|Page Max Rogers
  • 9. First Half Zone of Attack In the first half the majority of UC Davis attacks came down their right hand side. This was clearly to exert as much pressure as possible onto the UNLV left-back whilst also forcing their left-midfielder to defender more than attack. They were extremely unbalanced, as the diagram shows, which made their attacks quite predictable. Defensive Distribution A1 to B1 – 5% A1 to C1 – 15% A2 to B2 – 15% A2 to C2 – 5% A3 to B3 – 25% A3 to C3 – 35% Short Pass – 48% Long Pass – 52% UC Davis favoured a long passing game into the defensive channels of the opposing team. In particular the pass in behind the UNLV left-back. 9|Page Max Rogers
  • 10. Second Half Zone of Attack In the second half the majority of UC Davis attacks originated down the left hand side of their team, the opposite to what happened in the first half. It was unclear as to whether this was a particular ploy to target each individual full back over the course of the game. Again this method of attack become predictable and although they had a number of shots on goal they were as a result of a defensive error rather than a slick attacking move. Defensive Distribution A1 to B1 –9% A1 to C1 – 40% A2 to B2 – 5% A2 to C2 – 18.5% A3 to B3 – 9% A3 to C3 – 18.5% Short Pass – 13% Long Pass – 87% UC Davis favoured a long passing game into the defensive channels of the opposing team as was the case in the first half. They became more direct in the second half as they looked to score first. 10 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 11. Central Midfield Contribution and Striker Movement From the preliminary analysis conducted during the game against Chico, it was observed that the UC Davis central midfield players were reluctant to receive and distribute passes to assist with the attacking transitions. In order to identify their contribution during this game there was a particular focus on their performance. Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of the Central Midfielders of the Striker  Successful Pass Movement  Unsuccessful Pass  Into the channel between defenders  Successful Shot  Drop deep  Unsuccessful Shot  In behind centre backs  Successful Header Action  Unsuccessful Header  Pass/Cross  Tackles  Turn/Dribble  Interceptions  Shot on goal Another key aspect of performance was the striker’s movement and decision making. Above are the Key Performance Indicators for the forward players. 11 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 12. Central Midfield Contribution 21 3 First Half Actions 10 0 Successful Passes Successful Shots Unsuccessful Passes Unsuccessful Shots Successful 25% Unsuccessful 5 12 75% 10 1 Interceptions Successful Headers Tackles Unsuccessful Headers Second Half Actions 5 41 19 1 Successful Successful Passes Successful Shots Unsuccessful Passes Unsuccessful Shots 26% Unsuccessful 7 74% 20 2 8 Successful Headers Interceptions Unsuccessful Tackles Headers 12 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 13. Striker Movement First Half Drop Deep In Behind 31% In the Channel 56% Received the Ball 13% 4 times from 9 Action(s) Received the Ball Received the Ball Pass/Cross – 3 4 times from 5 Dribble/Turn – 2 0 times from 2 Action(s) Action(s) Pass/Cross – 4 Second Half Drop Deep Received the Ball In Behind 25% In the Channel 3 times from 3 42% Action(s) Received the Ball 33% Dribble/Turn – 3 1 time from 5 Received the Ball 3 times from 4 Action(s) Action(s) Pass/Cross – 1 Pass/Cross – 1 Dribble/Turn – 1 Shot - 1 13 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 14. Summary of Analysis First Half  UC Davis played a very direct game in the first half with the majority of their attacks (63%) coming down the right hand side of their team. These attacks were initiated via long and direct passes (52%) by the defenders hoping to exploit the space in behind the opposing full back, subsequently forcing the UNLV midfield towards their own goal.  This direct approach was further highlighted through the stats of the three central midfielders. They only attempted 31 passes (21 successful) which indicated that they were being bypassed during the attacking transition and were not involved in recycling and circulating the ball.  The most common movement made by the lone striker in the first half was to drop deep into space between the lines of defence and midfield (56%). The direct approach taken by the defenders didn’t match this movement as they only played the ball into the striker 4 times from 9 runs. Although the success rate for receiving balls in the channel was high (4 times from 5) it often resulted in UC Davis losing possession of the ball. If they had used the deep run from the striker as a platform to build attacks they may have been able to work their way higher up the field whilst keeping possession. Second Half  The approach in the second half became more direct than in the first half overall. They attacked most prominently down the left hand side (72%). There was an increase in the directness of the attacks as this time 87% of the passes from defence were direct towards the striker.  UC Davis’s midfield trio had a greater involvement in the game as they attempted 60 passes (41 successful), although again they preferred not to initiate the attacking moves. Instead they worked harder to retain possession of the ball before laying passes off to the fullbacks or central defenders to find the striker with a long ball. They did provide greater attacking threat with a total of 6 shots.  The opposite occurred in the second half in relation to the runs being made by the striker. The most common run was into the channel between defenders (42%) 14 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 15. although the ball was only received here 1 time from 5. The success rate after dropping deep was 3 from 3 – 100%. Overall, using the analysis from both games, it is clear that UC Davis favour a direct attacking approach which involves as little risk as possible with regards to losing possession during long build up play in their defensive/midfield thirds. They possess a selection of forward players capable of producing a variety of runs in order to find space and pose a threat to the opposition; however the support to these players and the predictable approach taken by the team in their attacking transition makes them almost void. The midfielders carried the greatest attacking threat as they were responsible for 9 of the 11 shots on goal. 15 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 16. Assignment Two – Training Session The objective of the training session is attacking patterns and striker movement, with a focus on creating two attacking patterns for the team to use whilst also creating greater cohesion amongst the side during these attacks so everyone understands their role. The session is made up of four areas which are outlined below. Warm-Up  A themed warm-up relating to attacking play and striker movement combined with dynamic stretches, off the ball movement and plenty of ball contact. Component One  The first component provides a basic introduction to the two attacking options. The first one involves a striker dropping deep acting as a false nine, whilst the second option involves an overlap from a full back to push the midfield up the pitch. Component Two  The second component uses the specific moves in a small sided game (8v8), with two teams attempting to complete them. Game conditions can be utilised to encourage the players to use the movements introduced via Component One. Phase of Play  The Phase of Play is the most game like situation with an attacking overload (10v6) to encourage success in the attacking phase. When an opportunity arises to use an attacking pattern, but is missed, play is stopped and ‘rewound’ to complete the play. 16 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 17. Warm-Up Possession Boxes with Target Player Key Four boxes are filled with three players plus one target player fulfilling the role of a striker. Each box also has one ball. Dimensions – 40x40 Play starts with the groups passing the ball around their square Yellow – Target Player in any sequence with all players constantly moving around the Grey – Player area. Duration – 10 minutes 2 mins instruction On the coach’s call, the players transfer their ball clockwise 8 mins work around the square aiming for the yellow target player who has two options – drop deep to the edge of square or make a run towards the back of the square to receive a longer pass. When a player isn’t in possession of the ball they must perform a dynamic movement or stretch. High knees, ankle flicks, lunges, side steps, lateral shifts, hamstring extensions, opening the groins and skipping. Progression After the first four minutes of work a playmaker is introduced in each group of four who is only allowed to pass the ball to the next box. 17 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 18. Component One Key False 9 Striker Movement Dimensions – ¾ of full field The aim of the first movement is to link play via a striker P1 – Pass One dropping deep into the space between the lines of the M1 – Movement One opponent’s defence and midfield. CM M1 Duration – 10 minutes The move starts when the centre midfielder makes a 2 mins instruction dummy run towards the centre back to create space for the 8 mins work striker. After doing so the midfielder turns sharply as the ball travels past. ST M1 The trigger for the striker’s movement deep is when the central midfielder has stopped their run deep. CB P1 The centre back then plays the ball forward into towards the feet of the striker who sets the ball up for the central midfielder. LM M2 The left midfielder then bursts into life, having kept up with play, and begins their run forward in behind the full back as the striker touches the ball. 18 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 19. CM P2 The centre mid plays a driven ball in behind the full back before continuing a run into the box along with the strikers. Coaching Points  Movements performed at game pace with a particular focus on the timing.  Quality passing at all times. Restart move if there is a poor pass.  Players’ must be aware of team mate’s movements and act accordingly to support play.  When CM drops deep ensure they angle their run to allow a pass to be played forward.  ST lays the ball off with one touch for the CM to strike first time.  LM must start out on the touchline to create width and space between defenders. 19 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 20. Full Back Overlap CB P1 The centre back starts the move by playing the ball out wide to the full back. CM M2 As the ball reaches the full back the central midfielder drops at an angle to receive a pass from the full back (RB P2). RB M2 Having knocked the ball infield the full back then makes a forward run, overlapping the right midfielder. RM M3 To create space for the overlapping run the right midfielder is required to make a run infield before asking for a dummy pass from the central midfielder. CM P3 The ball is then played out wide from the middle of the field for the full back to run onto. Both strikers then attack the box and receive a cross from out wide (ST M4 and RB P4). 20 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 21. Coaching Points  Quality passing at all times. If the move breaks down restart from the beginning.  Movements performed at game pace. Very intense and sharp.  Timing of the runs must be accurate in order to create the required space.  Runs always made with an angle.  Strikers vary run into the box to make space. One goes near post, one hangs at the edge.  When crossing aim for a specific area rather than trying to find a player. 21 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 22. Component Two Key Both teams adopt a 2-3-2 formation in order to perform the moves covered in Component One. Dimensions – Half of full field Duration – 10 minutes The field is set-up with two 2 mins instruction channels, split into three 8 mins work sections, on either side. Players are free to move in and out of the channel. However, if the full back enters the channel the midfielder must be at least one box ahead of them. This is to encourage the wide midfielders to remain high up the field and in support of attacks. When initiating the full back overlap move this is not important as the wide midfielder is required to cut infield to create the space out wide, meaning that they are vacating the channel. Coaching Points  Perform moves when the opportunity arises; maintain quick game like tempo at all times.  Improvisation is also a key component of attacking, be expressive and creative. 22 | P a g e Max Rogers
  • 23. Phase of Play Key The attacking team, in grey, line-up in a 3-3-2 formation and the yellow defending team line-up with a 4-1-1 Dimensions – ¾ full field formation creating a 9v7 overload in favour of the Yellow – Defenders attacking team. Grey – Attackers Duration – 15 minutes The ball always starts from the attacking teams’ 3 mins instruction goalkeeper while the position of the defence, yellow team, 12 mins work is always reset to a realistic position before play is restarted after a goal. If the defending team gain possession of the ball their aim is to play the ball forward to their striker to hold it up. Coaching Points  Encourage the use of movements from previous two components. If an opportunity is missed play is taken back and corrections made.  Players are also encouraged to be creative and make their own decisions when attacking, e.g. using the wide midfielder to cross the ball instead of the full back.  Tempo must be game equivalent. 23 | P a g e Max Rogers