SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 15
Baixar para ler offline
Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields
April 2015
Independent Statistics & Analysis
www.eia.gov
U.S. Department of Energy
Washington, DC 20585
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields i
This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and
analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are
independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views
in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or
other Federal agencies.
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields ii
Table of Contents
Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields..................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1
The top 100’s share of U.S. proved reserves in 2013 ..............................................................................1
Changes since 2009....................................................................................................................................... 4
Changes in the top 100 Oil Fields ............................................................................................................ 4
Changes in the top 100 gas fields ............................................................................................................ 4
Top 100 fields ranking tables................................................................................................................... 4
Figures
Figure 1. U.S. proved reserves of crude oil and lease condensate, 1993-2013............................................1
Figure 2. U.S. proved reserves of total natural gas, 1993-2013 ...................................................................2
Figure 3. Distribution of U.S. proved reserves, 2013 (in groups of 10) ........................................................3
Tables
Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013.............................................................................5
Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013 ...........................................................................8
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 1
Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields
Introduction
This supplement to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved
Reserves, 2013 ranks the 100 largest U.S. oil and gas fields by their estimated 2013 proved reserves.
EIA defines a field as “an area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on, or related
to, the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. There may be two or more
reservoirs in a field that are separated vertically by intervening impervious strata or laterally by local geologic
barriers, or by both.” This definition is not used by all states in their designation of fields; consequently, areas
classified as individual fields by some states may be found combined in these tables or in the EIA Field Code
Master List.
Particularly in the case of unconventional shale plays for both crude oil and natural gas, multiple areas or fields
may have been combined into one entry within these ranking tables. The resultant field entry in the table is
labeled as an area or unit, e.g., Marcellus Shale Area, Haynesville Shale Unit, Spraberry Trend Area, and
Hugoton Gas Area.
The oil field production and reserves data include both crude oil and lease condensate. The gas field
production and reserves data are total natural gas, wet after lease separation, which is the sum of associated-
dissolved natural gas and nonassociated natural gas with natural gas plant liquids not yet removed.
The top 100’s share of U.S. proved reserves in 2013
The top 100 oil fields as of December 31, 2013, accounted for 20.6 billion barrels of crude oil and lease
condensate proved reserves, which was 56% of the U.S. total (36.5 billion barrels) in 2013 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. U.S. proved reserves of crude oil and lease condensate, 1993-2013
billion barrels
Notes: Annual Reports in 1994-95 featured a reprint of 1993 top 100 fields data. No top 100 fields data were published in 2010-12.
Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. U.S. Crude Oil,
Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves (DOE/EIA-0216), Annual Reports 1993-2009.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40 U.S. crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves
Top 100 fields reserves subtotal
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 2
The top 100 gas fields as of December 31, 2013, accounted for 239.7 trillion cubic feet of total natural gas
proved reserves, about 68% of the U.S. total natural gas proved reserves in 2013 (Figure 2).
Figure 2. U.S. proved reserves of total natural gas, 1993-2013
trillion cubic feet
Notes: Annual Reports in 1994-95 featured a reprint of 1993 top 100 fields data. No top 100 fields data were published in 2010-12.
Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. U.S. Crude Oil,
Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves (DOE/EIA-0216), Annual Reports 1993-2009.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
U.S. total natural gas proved reserves
Top 100 fields reserves subtotal
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 3
Figure 3. Distribution of U.S. proved reserves, 2013 (in groups of 10)
percentage of U.S. proved reserves
Note: In some fields, only one or very few operators are the source of proved reserves estimates. Therefore, EIA does not provide field-
specific proved reserves estimates in order to avoid compromising proprietary data. Instead, EIA combines the proved reserves
estimates of the top 100 fields into groups of 10 to provide a sense of the operated concentration of total proved reserves, while still
protecting data sources. Columns may not add to 100% because of independent rounding.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013.
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 4
Changes Since 2009
EIA last published its ranking of the top 100 oil and gas fields in 2009.
Changes in the top 100 Oil Fields
In 2009, the United States had 22.3 billion barrels of
crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves, and its
top 100 oil fields had 62.3% of that total, or 13.9 billion
barrels of proved reserves. In 2013, the United States
had 36.5 billion barrels of crude oil and lease
condensate proved reserves, and its top 100 U.S. oil
fields had 56.4% of that total, or 20.6 billion barrels of
proved reserves (Table 1).
Prominent new additions to the top 10 are two fields
from the Eagle Ford Shale Play in Texas, Eagleville and
Briscoe Ranch. Eagleville, discovered in 2009, spans 14
counties in South Texas and is the country’s largest oil
field as ranked by estimated proved reserves. Prudhoe
Bay Field in Alaska (the largest U.S. oil field in 2009)
declined in rank to third place, also behind the
Spraberry Trend Area of Texas.
Changes in the top 100 gas fields
In 2009, the United States had 283.9 trillion cubic feet
(Tcf) of total natural gas proved reserves, and its top
100 gas fields had 60.8% of that total, or 172.7 Tcf of
proved reserves. In 2013, the United States had 354.0
Tcf of total natural gas proved reserves, and its top 100
U.S. gas fields had 67.7% of the total, or 239.7 billion
cubic feet of proved reserves (Table 2).
A notable addition to the top 10 is the Marcellus Shale
Area. This shale gas play currently includes proved
reserves from north central West Virginia and a large
expanse of Pennsylvania—from the southwest corner to
the northeast. The Marcellus Shale Area has surpassed
the Barnett Shale to become the largest U.S. gas field
ranked by estimated proved reserves in 2013.
Top 100 fields ranking tables
The following tables rank the top 100 U.S. oil and gas fields by their 2013 proved reserves, but the field-specific
reserves are not disclosed. Instead, field-specific estimated production volumes (provided by operators) are
offered to give an idea of relative field size.
Also included in the tables are the discovery years of the top 100 fields (Source: U.S. Energy Information
Administration, 2013 Field Code Master List.) For additional reserves information, including breakouts by state
and state subdivision, see the report U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, 2013.
Eagle Ford Shale Play, Western Gulf Basin
Marcellus Shale Play, Appalachian Basin
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 5
Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013
thousands of barrels of 42 U.S. gallons
2013
Rank Field Name Location
2013 Proved
Reserves
2013 Estimated
Production
Discovery
Year
1 EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 238,050 2009
2 SPRABERRY TREND AREA TX - 99,787 1949
3 PRUDHOE BAY AK - 79,080 1967
4 WATTENBERG CO - 47,259 1970
5 BRISCOE RANCH (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 62,046 1962
6 KUPARUK RIVER AK - 29,487 1969
7 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 778 (THUNDER HORSE) Fed Gulf - 15,833 1999
8 WASSON TX - 19,996 1937
9 BELRIDGE SOUTH CA - 23,703 1911
10 GREEN CANYON BLK 699 (ATLANTIS) Fed Gulf - 27,346 1998
Group 1-10 Volume Subtotal 9,659,688 642,587
11 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 807 (MARS) Fed Gulf - 19,587 1989
12 GREEN CANYON BLK 826 (MAD DOG) Fed Gulf - 11,665 1998
13 SUGARKANE TX - 25,793 2009
14 DE WITT TX - 18,291 1959
15 MIDWAY-SUNSET CA - 28,766 1901
16 KERN RIVER CA - 25,494 1899
17 CAT CANYON CA - 1,187 1909
18 GOLDSMITH TX - 8,492 1935
19 STANLEY (BAKKEN SHALE) ND - 17,587 1977
20 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 854 (URSA) Fed Gulf - 19,396 1991
Group 11-20 Volume Subtotal 2,798,850 176,258
21 CEDAR HILLS MT & ND & SD - 15,880 1951
22 ELK HILLS CA - 12,922 1919
23 WALKER RIDGE BLK 678 (ST. MALO) Fed Gulf - - 2003
24 GREEN CANYON BLK 654 (SHENZI) Fed Gulf - 35,280 2002
25 SLAUGHTER TX - 8,930 1937
26 WILMINGTON CA - 13,801 1932
27 GREEN CANYON BLK 640 (TAHITI) Fed Gulf - 24,808 2002
28 SANISH (BAKKEN SHALE) ND - 23,832 1953
29 MONUMENT BUTTE UT - 5,452 1964
30 SIVERSTON ND - 3,782 2006
Group 21-30 Volume Subtotal 1,891,056 144,687
31 HEART BUTTE ND - 7,825 1994
32 RUSSIAN CREEK (BAKKEN SHALE) ND - 307 1978
33 BANKS ND - 4,912 1982
34 ELM COULEE (BAKKEN SHALE) MT - 11,793 2000
35 WALKER RIDGE BLK 508 (STONES) Fed Gulf - - 2005
36 HONDO Fed Pacific - 5,335 1969
37 ALPINE AK - 13,496 1994
38 LEVELLAND TX - 6,424 1945
39 SALT CREEK WY - 4,051 1889
40 ALTAMONT-BLUEBELL UT - 5,498 1949
Group 31-40 Volume Subtotal 1 ,358,894 59,641
41 TRUAX ND - 4,011 1990
42 SEMINOLE TX - 7,106 1936
43 ALAMINOS CANYON BLK 857 (GREAT WHITE) Fed Gulf - 23,360 2002
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 6
Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.)
thousands of barrels of 42 U.S. gallons
2013
Rank Field Name Location
2013
Proved
Reserves
2013 Estimated
Production
Discovery
Year
44 LIN TX - 8,186 1984
45 CYMRIC CA - 14,306 1916
46 FUHRMAN-MASCHO TX - 7,277 1930
47 WARD-ESTES NORTH TX - 3,694 1927
48 LOST HILLS CA - 10,242 1910
49 EAST FORK ND - 2,476 1984
50 WEST SAK AK - 5,755 1969
Group 41-50 Volume Subtotal 1,140,424 86,413
51 SHO-VEL-TUM OK - 6,116 1905
52 WALKER RIDGE BLK 29 (BIG FOOT) Fed Gulf - - 2009
53 HOWARD-GLASSCOCK TX - 3,519 1925
54 REUNION BAY ND - 4,407 2008
55 SAN ARDO CA - 7,229 1947
56 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 503 (WHO DAT) Fed Gulf - 8,808 2007
57 ALGER ND - 8,294 2008
58 ANTELOPE ND - 3,737 1953
59 VENTURA CA - 5,115 1916
60 HOBBS NM & TX - 3,441 1928
Group 51-60 Volume Subtotal 71,942 50,666
61 BLUE BUTTES ND - 4,930 1955
62 GREEN CANYON BLK 903 (HEIDELBERG) Fed Gulf - - 2009
63 WALKER RIDGE BLK 627 (JULIA) Fed Gulf - - 2007
64 ALKALI CREEK ND - 2,348 1990
65 NIKAITCHUQ AK - 4,820 2004
66 HAWKVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 8,226 2009
67 WOLFBONE TREND TX - 3,925 2008
68 CAMP ND - 4,308 1982
69 GRAIL ND - 3,223 2008
70 CHARLSON ND - 2,563 1952
Group 61-70 Volume Subtotal 25,350 34,343
71 MILNE POINT AK - 6,730 1982
72 YATES TX - 7,484 1926
73 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 383 (NAKIKA - KEPLER) Fed Gulf - 21,206 1987
74 SACATE Fed Pacific - 3,093 1970
75 GREEN CANYON BLK 562 (K2) Fed Gulf - 3,586 2002
76 COALINGA CA - 5,660 1887
77 MCGREGORY BUTTES ND - 5,044 2008
78 PHANTOM TX - 10,421 1976
79 HASTINGS WEST TX - 2,032 1958
80 EMPIRE NM - 3,516 1945
Group 71-80 Volume Subtotal 13,225 68,772
81 KERN FRONT CA - 3,187 1925
82 GARDEN BANKS BLK 426 (AUGER) Fed Gulf - 2,415 1987
83 GARDEN CITY SOUTH TX - 3,464 1964
84 MURPHY CREEK ND - 5,111 1982
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 7
Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.)
thousands of barrels of 42 U.S. gallons
2013
Rank Field Name Location
2013
Proved
Reserves
2013 Estimated
Production
Discovery
Year
85 PINEDALE WY - 4,024 1955
86 GREATER ANETH UT - 4,131 1956
87 INGLEWOOD CA - 2,733 1924
88 GREEN CANYON BLK 683 (CAESAR - TONGA) Fed Gulf - 3,840 2006
89 FULLERTON TX - 4,010 1942
90 GIDDINGS TX - 8,247 1960
Group 81-90 Volume Subtotal 49,082 41,162
91 COWDEN NORTH TX - 3,378 1930
92 DORA ROBERTS TX - 1,790 1954
93 HOLT RANCH TX - 1,937 1954
94 JONAH WY - 2,270 1977
95 ROBINSON LAKE ND - 3,319 2006
96 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA - 2,251 1920
97 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 84 (KING - HORN MT.) Fed Gulf - 6,151 1999
98 POSO CREEK CA - 3,325 1929
99 WALKER RIDGE BLK 469 (CHINOOK) Fed Gulf - 2,326 2003
100 FORT TRINIDAD TX - 2,096 1952
Group 91-100 Volume Subtotal 99,726 28,843
Top 100 Oil Fields Volume Subtotal 20,608,237 1,333,372
Top 100 Percentage of U.S. Total 56.4% 48.9%
U.S. TOTAL CRUDE OIL & LEASE CONDENSATE (2013) 36,520,000 2,729,000
Note: In some fields, only one or very few operators are the source of proved reserves estimates. Therefore, EIA does not provide field-
specific proved reserves estimates in order to avoid compromising proprietary data. Instead, EIA combines the proved reserves
estimates of the top 100 fields into groups of 10 to provide a sense of the operated concentration of total proved reserves, while still
protecting data sources.
Source of proved reserves and estimated production: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic
Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. Field production estimates are reported by operators. The estimated production total in this table differs
slightly from the official EIA 2013 U.S. total production estimate (2,717,876,000 barrels). Source of field discovery years: U.S. Energy
Information Administration, Field Code Master List 2013.
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 8
Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013
million cubic feet at 14.73 psia and 60 degrees Fahrenheit
2013
Rank Field Name Location
2013 Proved
Reserves
2013 Estimated
Production
Discovery
Year
1 MARCELLUS SHALE AREA PA & WV - 2,836,043 2008
2 NEWARK EAST (BARNETT SHALE) TX - 1,951,750 1981
3 B-43 AREA (FAYETTEVILLE SHALE) AR - 1,025,153 2005
4 SAN JUAN BASIN GAS AREA CO & NM - 1,024,962 1927
5 HAYNESVILLE SHALE UNIT LA - 1,425,661 2008
6 PINEDALE WY - 568,153 1955
7 CARTHAGE TX - 653,093 1936
8 JONAH WY - 239,233 1977
9 WATTENBERG CO - 304,540 1970
10 PRUDHOE BAY AK - 147,554 1967
Group 1 -10 Volume Subtotal 144,614,724 10,176,142
11 SPRABERRY TREND AREA TX - 307,295 1949
12 EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 435,200 2009
13 BRISCOE RANCH (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 463,182 1962
14 NATURAL BUTTES UT - 277,901 1940
15 HUGOTON GAS AREA KS & OK & TX - 222,304 1922
16 MAMM CREEK CO - 133,950 1959
17 HAWKVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 213,946 2008
18 ARDMORE OK - 5,191 1942
19 ANADARKO BASIN (WOODFORD) OK - 136,085 2008
20 FOGARTY CREEK WY - 29,127 1975
Group 11-20 Volume Subtotal 36,652,912 2,224,181
21 OWEN TX - 89,055 1968
22 LAKE RIDGE WY - 13,254 1981
23 SUGARKANE TX - 155,603 2009
24 WATONGA-CHICKASHA TREND OK - 123,653 1948
25 PRB COAL BED MT & WY - 303,385 1992
26 DE WITT TX - 97,866 1959
27 RULISON CO - 117,742 1958
28 GRAND VALLEY CO - 132,330 1985
29 ANTRIM (ANTRIM SHALE) MI - 102,076 1965
30 BIG SANDY KY & WV - 66,667 1926
Group 21 - 30 Volume Subtotal 16,501,143 1,201,631
31 STILES RANCH OK & TX - 138,838 1978
32 PARACHUTE CO - 98,863 1985
33 MADDEN WY - 74,301 1968
34 KNOX OK - 42,959 1916
35 GATES RANCH TX - 66,277 1968
36 OAKWOOD VA - 63,293 1990
37 RATON BASIN GAS AREA CO & NM - 110,491 1998
38 TERRYVILLE LA - 27,020 1959
39 LOWER MOBILE BAY AREA AL & Fed Gulf - 83,182 1979
40 GOLDEN TREND OK - 43,388 1945
Group 31-40 Volume Subtotal 10,615,858 748,612
41 WAYNESBURG PA - 10,364 1889
42 ARMENIA PA - 83,440 2008
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 9
Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.)
million cubic feet at 14.73 psia and 60 degrees Fahrenheit
2013
Rank Field Name Location
2013 Proved
Reserves
2013 Estimated
Production
Discovery
Year
43 BRUFF WY - 50,591 1969
44 BEAR GRASS TX - 54,309 1977
45 HERRICK PA - 79,854 2008
46 ELK HILLS CA - 88,681 1919
47 FREESTONE TX - 53,831 1949
48 PINE HOLLOW SOUTH OK - 62,443 1959
49 ELM GROVE LA - 33,742 1916
50 PARACHUTE NORTH CO - 52,247 2007
Group 41-50 Volume Subtotal 7,823,926 569,502
51 BUFFALO WALLOW TX - 56,351 1969
52 ECHO SPRINGS WY - 33,677 1976
53 CHAPITA WELLS UT - 2,351 1952
54 BIG RUN-BIRCHFIELD WV - 21,971 1905
55 NORA VA - 38,988 1949
56 WAMSUTTER WY - 39,529 1958
57 BALD PRAIRIE TX - 57,381 1976
58 OAK HILL TX - 60,051 1958
59 SAWYER TX - 39,768 1960
60 MAJORSVILLE PA & WV - 644 1905
Group 51-60 Volume Subtotal ,693,930 350,711
61 STRONG CITY DISTRICT OK - 53,679 1966
62 STANDARD DRAW WY - 30,235 1979
63 CASPIANA LA - 37,287 1925
64 JOHN AMORUSO TX - 24,567 2005
65 CHEROKEE WEST OK - 32,378 1956
66 WILD ROSE WY - 27,265 1975
67 AUBURN WV - 17,781 1923
68 FRENCHIE DRAW WY - 19,904 1961
69 RILEY RIDGE WY - 50 1980
70 GIDDINGS TX - 64,523 1960
Group 61-70 Volume Subtotal 5,223,468 307,669
71 WASSON TX - 31,042 1937
72 COALGATE NE OK - 21,611 2003
73 YELLOWJACKET CO - 62,381 2009
74 BEND NORTH PA - 2,343 1951
75 RED WASH UT - 13,738 1959
76 GOLDSMITH TX - 24,538 1935
77 FARRAR TX - 40,429 1963
78 TIP TOP WY - 11,069 1928
79 TRAIL WY - 15,478 1958
80 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 854 (URSA) Fed Gulf - 27,984 1991
Group 71-80 Volume Subtotal 4,269,831 250,613
81 LOVE RANCH CO - 29,322 1999
82 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 807 (MARS) Fed Gulf - 20,458 1989
83 LIN TX - 29,391 1984
84 MOUNDSVILLE WV - 23,839 1887
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 10
Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.)
million cubic feet at 14.73 psia and 60 degrees Fahrenheit
2013
Rank Field Name Location
2013 Proved
Reserves
2013 Estimated
Production
Discovery
Year
85 MENDOTA NW TX - 40,467 1962
86 LIPSCOMB OK & TX - 37,358 1957
87 TIERNEY WY - 14,006 1973
88 VEGA NORTH CO - 19,718 1977
89 KEATHLEY CANYON BLK 964 (HADRIAN SOUTH) Fed Gulf - - 2009
90 MAYFIELD NE OK - 37,569 1951
Group 81-90 Volume Subtotal 3,787,022 252,128
91 HILLTOP RESORT TX - 23,585 2007
92 GRUGAN PA - 33,952 1982
93 BELLEVERNON PA - 4,062 1887
94 GARDEN CITY SOUTH TX - 14,345 1964
95 VERNON LA - 23,978 1967
96 PENNSBORO-TOLLGATE WV - 11,046 -
97 SHO-VEL-TUM OK - 24,449 1905
98 TEAGUE (CV-BOSSIER CONS.) TX - 32,319 1945
99 PICEANCE CREEK CO - 26,326 1930
100 ALAMINOS CANYON BLK 857 (GREAT WHITE) Fed Gulf - 34,350 2002
Group 91-100 Volume Subtotal 3,473,473 228,412
TOP 100 GAS FIELDS VOLUME SUBTOTAL 239,656,287 16,309,601
Top 100 Percentage of U.S. Total 67.7% 61.6%
U.S. TOTAL NATURAL GAS (2013) 353,994,000 26,467,000
Note: In some fields, only one or very few operators are the source of proved reserves estimates. Therefore EIA does not provide field-
specific proved reserves estimates in order to avoid compromising proprietary data. Instead, EIA combines the proved reserves
estimates of the top 100 fields into groups of 10 to provide a sense of the operated concentration of total proved reserves, while still
protecting data sources. Marcellus Shale Area was calculated from estimates of shale gas of Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Source of proved reserves and estimated production: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic
Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. The estimated production total in this table differs slightly from the official EIA 2013 U.S. marketed gas
production estimate (27,259,815,000,000 cubic feet).
Source of field discovery years: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Field Code Master List 2013.
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 11
Top 100 fields location maps
Locations of the top 100 oil and gas fields of 2013 are shown on the following maps. Many fields appear on
both maps because they have significant volumes of both hydrocarbons.
April 2015
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 12

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Team Alpha ECN 410 final paper
Team Alpha ECN 410 final paperTeam Alpha ECN 410 final paper
Team Alpha ECN 410 final paper
Brent Welcher
 

Mais procurados (6)

Us shale gas industry analysis
Us shale gas industry analysisUs shale gas industry analysis
Us shale gas industry analysis
 
Cabot Oil & Gas Investor Presentation/Update December 2013
Cabot Oil & Gas Investor Presentation/Update December 2013Cabot Oil & Gas Investor Presentation/Update December 2013
Cabot Oil & Gas Investor Presentation/Update December 2013
 
Team Alpha ECN 410 final paper
Team Alpha ECN 410 final paperTeam Alpha ECN 410 final paper
Team Alpha ECN 410 final paper
 
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - July 2014
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - July 2014Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - July 2014
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - July 2014
 
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - Feb 2015
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - Feb 2015Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - Feb 2015
Magnum Hunter Resources Investor Presentation - Feb 2015
 
Newest Investor Presentation from Magnum Hunter Resources, Issued Oct 2014
Newest Investor Presentation from Magnum Hunter Resources, Issued Oct 2014Newest Investor Presentation from Magnum Hunter Resources, Issued Oct 2014
Newest Investor Presentation from Magnum Hunter Resources, Issued Oct 2014
 

Destaque

Destaque (18)

Report: Housing and Marcellus Shale Development in PA
Report: Housing and Marcellus Shale Development in PAReport: Housing and Marcellus Shale Development in PA
Report: Housing and Marcellus Shale Development in PA
 
Leatherstocking Gas - Maps for Future Plans to Install Gas Lines in Windsor, NY
Leatherstocking Gas - Maps for Future Plans to Install Gas Lines in Windsor, NYLeatherstocking Gas - Maps for Future Plans to Install Gas Lines in Windsor, NY
Leatherstocking Gas - Maps for Future Plans to Install Gas Lines in Windsor, NY
 
IEA's Medium-Term Gas Market Report - Executive Summary
IEA's Medium-Term Gas Market Report - Executive SummaryIEA's Medium-Term Gas Market Report - Executive Summary
IEA's Medium-Term Gas Market Report - Executive Summary
 
Dallas Salazar Plan to Rescue Magnum Hunter Resources
Dallas Salazar Plan to Rescue Magnum Hunter ResourcesDallas Salazar Plan to Rescue Magnum Hunter Resources
Dallas Salazar Plan to Rescue Magnum Hunter Resources
 
Rice Energy May 2015 Company Presentation
Rice Energy May 2015 Company PresentationRice Energy May 2015 Company Presentation
Rice Energy May 2015 Company Presentation
 
Sham Report on Fracking "Failures" in the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale
Sham Report on Fracking "Failures" in the Pennsylvania Marcellus ShaleSham Report on Fracking "Failures" in the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale
Sham Report on Fracking "Failures" in the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale
 
WVDEP Consent Order for MarkWest Energy, Assessing a $76,405 Fine for Water V...
WVDEP Consent Order for MarkWest Energy, Assessing a $76,405 Fine for Water V...WVDEP Consent Order for MarkWest Energy, Assessing a $76,405 Fine for Water V...
WVDEP Consent Order for MarkWest Energy, Assessing a $76,405 Fine for Water V...
 
WVCBP Policy Brief: A Win-Win Marcellus Shale Tax Incentive
WVCBP Policy Brief: A Win-Win Marcellus Shale Tax IncentiveWVCBP Policy Brief: A Win-Win Marcellus Shale Tax Incentive
WVCBP Policy Brief: A Win-Win Marcellus Shale Tax Incentive
 
May 2015 EIA Drilling Productivity Report
May 2015 EIA Drilling Productivity ReportMay 2015 EIA Drilling Productivity Report
May 2015 EIA Drilling Productivity Report
 
Data Regarding Hydraulic Fracturing Distributions and Treatment Fluids, Addit...
Data Regarding Hydraulic Fracturing Distributions and Treatment Fluids, Addit...Data Regarding Hydraulic Fracturing Distributions and Treatment Fluids, Addit...
Data Regarding Hydraulic Fracturing Distributions and Treatment Fluids, Addit...
 
Presentation: AC Mitigation Case Histories
Presentation: AC Mitigation Case HistoriesPresentation: AC Mitigation Case Histories
Presentation: AC Mitigation Case Histories
 
Ohio Landowner Lawsuit Against Chesapeake Energy for Shorting Royalty Checks
Ohio Landowner Lawsuit Against Chesapeake Energy for Shorting Royalty ChecksOhio Landowner Lawsuit Against Chesapeake Energy for Shorting Royalty Checks
Ohio Landowner Lawsuit Against Chesapeake Energy for Shorting Royalty Checks
 
Schlumberger 4Q14 & Full Year 2014 Results
Schlumberger 4Q14 & Full Year 2014 ResultsSchlumberger 4Q14 & Full Year 2014 Results
Schlumberger 4Q14 & Full Year 2014 Results
 
Defense of Property Rights Act
Defense of Property Rights ActDefense of Property Rights Act
Defense of Property Rights Act
 
Pennsylvania Gas Outlook Report - June 2015
Pennsylvania Gas Outlook Report - June 2015Pennsylvania Gas Outlook Report - June 2015
Pennsylvania Gas Outlook Report - June 2015
 
PA Commonwealth Court Decision: Gorsline v. Board of Supervisors
PA Commonwealth Court Decision: Gorsline v. Board of SupervisorsPA Commonwealth Court Decision: Gorsline v. Board of Supervisors
PA Commonwealth Court Decision: Gorsline v. Board of Supervisors
 
Potential Supply of Natural Gas in the United States
Potential Supply of Natural Gas in the United StatesPotential Supply of Natural Gas in the United States
Potential Supply of Natural Gas in the United States
 
RICO Lawsuit Filed Against Chesapeake Energy & Williams/Access Midstream in U...
RICO Lawsuit Filed Against Chesapeake Energy & Williams/Access Midstream in U...RICO Lawsuit Filed Against Chesapeake Energy & Williams/Access Midstream in U...
RICO Lawsuit Filed Against Chesapeake Energy & Williams/Access Midstream in U...
 

Semelhante a Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields

U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...
U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future -  Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future -  Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...
U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...
Bruce LaCour
 
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
Brian Stuart McBeth
 
FinalDissertation
FinalDissertationFinalDissertation
FinalDissertation
Myles Walsh
 
Understanding natural gas markets
Understanding natural gas marketsUnderstanding natural gas markets
Understanding natural gas markets
GE 94
 

Semelhante a Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields (20)

Afpm capacity report2015
Afpm capacity report2015Afpm capacity report2015
Afpm capacity report2015
 
Ey & Cerebral Business Research Shale Gas Report
Ey & Cerebral Business Research Shale Gas ReportEy & Cerebral Business Research Shale Gas Report
Ey & Cerebral Business Research Shale Gas Report
 
Step on the Gas! How to Extend America's Energy Advantage
Step on the Gas! How to Extend America's Energy AdvantageStep on the Gas! How to Extend America's Energy Advantage
Step on the Gas! How to Extend America's Energy Advantage
 
Oil Shale Economics
Oil Shale EconomicsOil Shale Economics
Oil Shale Economics
 
U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...
U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future -  Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future -  Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...
U.S. Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Crude Oil - Logic Versus Fai...
 
CRS: U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production in Federal and Non-Federal Areas
CRS: U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production in Federal and Non-Federal AreasCRS: U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production in Federal and Non-Federal Areas
CRS: U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production in Federal and Non-Federal Areas
 
Data visualization
Data visualizationData visualization
Data visualization
 
Potential Gas Committee Biennial Assessment of U.S. Natural Gas Supplies
Potential Gas Committee Biennial Assessment of U.S. Natural Gas SuppliesPotential Gas Committee Biennial Assessment of U.S. Natural Gas Supplies
Potential Gas Committee Biennial Assessment of U.S. Natural Gas Supplies
 
5 sep rfc buenos aries presentation
5 sep rfc buenos aries presentation5 sep rfc buenos aries presentation
5 sep rfc buenos aries presentation
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Energy Industry | Q1 2015 | Segment: Explorati...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Energy Industry | Q1 2015 | Segment:  Explorati...Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Energy Industry | Q1 2015 | Segment:  Explorati...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Energy Industry | Q1 2015 | Segment: Explorati...
 
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
 
The Economics and Uncertainty of Offshore Drilling
The Economics and Uncertainty of Offshore DrillingThe Economics and Uncertainty of Offshore Drilling
The Economics and Uncertainty of Offshore Drilling
 
EIA Report: Trends in U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Upstream Costs
EIA Report: Trends in U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Upstream CostsEIA Report: Trends in U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Upstream Costs
EIA Report: Trends in U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Upstream Costs
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Exploration and Production | Q3 2016
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Exploration and Production | Q3 2016Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Exploration and Production | Q3 2016
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Exploration and Production | Q3 2016
 
Outlook for Energy and Minerals Markets - for the 116th Congress
Outlook for Energy and Minerals Markets - for the 116th CongressOutlook for Energy and Minerals Markets - for the 116th Congress
Outlook for Energy and Minerals Markets - for the 116th Congress
 
EY US Oil and Gas Reserves Study 2016
EY US Oil and Gas Reserves Study 2016EY US Oil and Gas Reserves Study 2016
EY US Oil and Gas Reserves Study 2016
 
North American Oil & Gas- Supply, Demand & Export Outlook
North American Oil & Gas- Supply, Demand & Export OutlookNorth American Oil & Gas- Supply, Demand & Export Outlook
North American Oil & Gas- Supply, Demand & Export Outlook
 
Tulane Law School Summit Spr Energy Securityin Changes Times Jm Drake
Tulane Law School Summit Spr Energy Securityin Changes Times Jm DrakeTulane Law School Summit Spr Energy Securityin Changes Times Jm Drake
Tulane Law School Summit Spr Energy Securityin Changes Times Jm Drake
 
FinalDissertation
FinalDissertationFinalDissertation
FinalDissertation
 
Understanding natural gas markets
Understanding natural gas marketsUnderstanding natural gas markets
Understanding natural gas markets
 

Mais de Marcellus Drilling News

Mais de Marcellus Drilling News (20)

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
 

Último

THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...
THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...
THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...
Faga1939
 
{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...
{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...
{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...
hyt3577
 

Último (20)

declarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdf
declarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdfdeclarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdf
declarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdf
 
*Navigating Electoral Terrain: TDP's Performance under N Chandrababu Naidu's ...
*Navigating Electoral Terrain: TDP's Performance under N Chandrababu Naidu's ...*Navigating Electoral Terrain: TDP's Performance under N Chandrababu Naidu's ...
*Navigating Electoral Terrain: TDP's Performance under N Chandrababu Naidu's ...
 
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdhEmbed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
 
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 62 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 62 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBusty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 62 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 62 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
05052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
05052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf05052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
05052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 48 (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 48 (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 48 (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 48 (Gurgaon)
 
06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
 
Group_5_US-China Trade War to understand the trade
Group_5_US-China Trade War to understand the tradeGroup_5_US-China Trade War to understand the trade
Group_5_US-China Trade War to understand the trade
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 47 (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 47 (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 47 (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 47 (Gurgaon)
 
Transformative Leadership: N Chandrababu Naidu and TDP's Vision for Innovatio...
Transformative Leadership: N Chandrababu Naidu and TDP's Vision for Innovatio...Transformative Leadership: N Chandrababu Naidu and TDP's Vision for Innovatio...
Transformative Leadership: N Chandrababu Naidu and TDP's Vision for Innovatio...
 
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopkoEmbed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
 
THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...
THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...
THE OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRAZIL IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA A...
 
{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...
{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...
{Qatar{^🚀^(+971558539980**}})Abortion Pills for Sale in Dubai. .abu dhabi, sh...
 
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreieGujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
 
America Is the Target; Israel Is the Front Line _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Blogs...
America Is the Target; Israel Is the Front Line _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Blogs...America Is the Target; Israel Is the Front Line _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Blogs...
America Is the Target; Israel Is the Front Line _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Blogs...
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Palam Vihar (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Palam Vihar (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Palam Vihar (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Palam Vihar (Gurgaon)
 
04052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
04052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf04052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
04052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...
KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...
KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...
 
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's DevelopmentNara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
 

Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields

  • 1. Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields April 2015 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585
  • 2. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies.
  • 3. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields ii Table of Contents Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields..................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 The top 100’s share of U.S. proved reserves in 2013 ..............................................................................1 Changes since 2009....................................................................................................................................... 4 Changes in the top 100 Oil Fields ............................................................................................................ 4 Changes in the top 100 gas fields ............................................................................................................ 4 Top 100 fields ranking tables................................................................................................................... 4 Figures Figure 1. U.S. proved reserves of crude oil and lease condensate, 1993-2013............................................1 Figure 2. U.S. proved reserves of total natural gas, 1993-2013 ...................................................................2 Figure 3. Distribution of U.S. proved reserves, 2013 (in groups of 10) ........................................................3 Tables Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013.............................................................................5 Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013 ...........................................................................8
  • 4. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 1 Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields Introduction This supplement to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, 2013 ranks the 100 largest U.S. oil and gas fields by their estimated 2013 proved reserves. EIA defines a field as “an area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on, or related to, the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. There may be two or more reservoirs in a field that are separated vertically by intervening impervious strata or laterally by local geologic barriers, or by both.” This definition is not used by all states in their designation of fields; consequently, areas classified as individual fields by some states may be found combined in these tables or in the EIA Field Code Master List. Particularly in the case of unconventional shale plays for both crude oil and natural gas, multiple areas or fields may have been combined into one entry within these ranking tables. The resultant field entry in the table is labeled as an area or unit, e.g., Marcellus Shale Area, Haynesville Shale Unit, Spraberry Trend Area, and Hugoton Gas Area. The oil field production and reserves data include both crude oil and lease condensate. The gas field production and reserves data are total natural gas, wet after lease separation, which is the sum of associated- dissolved natural gas and nonassociated natural gas with natural gas plant liquids not yet removed. The top 100’s share of U.S. proved reserves in 2013 The top 100 oil fields as of December 31, 2013, accounted for 20.6 billion barrels of crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves, which was 56% of the U.S. total (36.5 billion barrels) in 2013 (Figure 1). Figure 1. U.S. proved reserves of crude oil and lease condensate, 1993-2013 billion barrels Notes: Annual Reports in 1994-95 featured a reprint of 1993 top 100 fields data. No top 100 fields data were published in 2010-12. Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves (DOE/EIA-0216), Annual Reports 1993-2009. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 U.S. crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves Top 100 fields reserves subtotal
  • 5. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 2 The top 100 gas fields as of December 31, 2013, accounted for 239.7 trillion cubic feet of total natural gas proved reserves, about 68% of the U.S. total natural gas proved reserves in 2013 (Figure 2). Figure 2. U.S. proved reserves of total natural gas, 1993-2013 trillion cubic feet Notes: Annual Reports in 1994-95 featured a reprint of 1993 top 100 fields data. No top 100 fields data were published in 2010-12. Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves (DOE/EIA-0216), Annual Reports 1993-2009. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 U.S. total natural gas proved reserves Top 100 fields reserves subtotal
  • 6. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 3 Figure 3. Distribution of U.S. proved reserves, 2013 (in groups of 10) percentage of U.S. proved reserves Note: In some fields, only one or very few operators are the source of proved reserves estimates. Therefore, EIA does not provide field- specific proved reserves estimates in order to avoid compromising proprietary data. Instead, EIA combines the proved reserves estimates of the top 100 fields into groups of 10 to provide a sense of the operated concentration of total proved reserves, while still protecting data sources. Columns may not add to 100% because of independent rounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013.
  • 7. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 4 Changes Since 2009 EIA last published its ranking of the top 100 oil and gas fields in 2009. Changes in the top 100 Oil Fields In 2009, the United States had 22.3 billion barrels of crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves, and its top 100 oil fields had 62.3% of that total, or 13.9 billion barrels of proved reserves. In 2013, the United States had 36.5 billion barrels of crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves, and its top 100 U.S. oil fields had 56.4% of that total, or 20.6 billion barrels of proved reserves (Table 1). Prominent new additions to the top 10 are two fields from the Eagle Ford Shale Play in Texas, Eagleville and Briscoe Ranch. Eagleville, discovered in 2009, spans 14 counties in South Texas and is the country’s largest oil field as ranked by estimated proved reserves. Prudhoe Bay Field in Alaska (the largest U.S. oil field in 2009) declined in rank to third place, also behind the Spraberry Trend Area of Texas. Changes in the top 100 gas fields In 2009, the United States had 283.9 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of total natural gas proved reserves, and its top 100 gas fields had 60.8% of that total, or 172.7 Tcf of proved reserves. In 2013, the United States had 354.0 Tcf of total natural gas proved reserves, and its top 100 U.S. gas fields had 67.7% of the total, or 239.7 billion cubic feet of proved reserves (Table 2). A notable addition to the top 10 is the Marcellus Shale Area. This shale gas play currently includes proved reserves from north central West Virginia and a large expanse of Pennsylvania—from the southwest corner to the northeast. The Marcellus Shale Area has surpassed the Barnett Shale to become the largest U.S. gas field ranked by estimated proved reserves in 2013. Top 100 fields ranking tables The following tables rank the top 100 U.S. oil and gas fields by their 2013 proved reserves, but the field-specific reserves are not disclosed. Instead, field-specific estimated production volumes (provided by operators) are offered to give an idea of relative field size. Also included in the tables are the discovery years of the top 100 fields (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2013 Field Code Master List.) For additional reserves information, including breakouts by state and state subdivision, see the report U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, 2013. Eagle Ford Shale Play, Western Gulf Basin Marcellus Shale Play, Appalachian Basin
  • 8. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 5 Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013 thousands of barrels of 42 U.S. gallons 2013 Rank Field Name Location 2013 Proved Reserves 2013 Estimated Production Discovery Year 1 EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 238,050 2009 2 SPRABERRY TREND AREA TX - 99,787 1949 3 PRUDHOE BAY AK - 79,080 1967 4 WATTENBERG CO - 47,259 1970 5 BRISCOE RANCH (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 62,046 1962 6 KUPARUK RIVER AK - 29,487 1969 7 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 778 (THUNDER HORSE) Fed Gulf - 15,833 1999 8 WASSON TX - 19,996 1937 9 BELRIDGE SOUTH CA - 23,703 1911 10 GREEN CANYON BLK 699 (ATLANTIS) Fed Gulf - 27,346 1998 Group 1-10 Volume Subtotal 9,659,688 642,587 11 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 807 (MARS) Fed Gulf - 19,587 1989 12 GREEN CANYON BLK 826 (MAD DOG) Fed Gulf - 11,665 1998 13 SUGARKANE TX - 25,793 2009 14 DE WITT TX - 18,291 1959 15 MIDWAY-SUNSET CA - 28,766 1901 16 KERN RIVER CA - 25,494 1899 17 CAT CANYON CA - 1,187 1909 18 GOLDSMITH TX - 8,492 1935 19 STANLEY (BAKKEN SHALE) ND - 17,587 1977 20 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 854 (URSA) Fed Gulf - 19,396 1991 Group 11-20 Volume Subtotal 2,798,850 176,258 21 CEDAR HILLS MT & ND & SD - 15,880 1951 22 ELK HILLS CA - 12,922 1919 23 WALKER RIDGE BLK 678 (ST. MALO) Fed Gulf - - 2003 24 GREEN CANYON BLK 654 (SHENZI) Fed Gulf - 35,280 2002 25 SLAUGHTER TX - 8,930 1937 26 WILMINGTON CA - 13,801 1932 27 GREEN CANYON BLK 640 (TAHITI) Fed Gulf - 24,808 2002 28 SANISH (BAKKEN SHALE) ND - 23,832 1953 29 MONUMENT BUTTE UT - 5,452 1964 30 SIVERSTON ND - 3,782 2006 Group 21-30 Volume Subtotal 1,891,056 144,687 31 HEART BUTTE ND - 7,825 1994 32 RUSSIAN CREEK (BAKKEN SHALE) ND - 307 1978 33 BANKS ND - 4,912 1982 34 ELM COULEE (BAKKEN SHALE) MT - 11,793 2000 35 WALKER RIDGE BLK 508 (STONES) Fed Gulf - - 2005 36 HONDO Fed Pacific - 5,335 1969 37 ALPINE AK - 13,496 1994 38 LEVELLAND TX - 6,424 1945 39 SALT CREEK WY - 4,051 1889 40 ALTAMONT-BLUEBELL UT - 5,498 1949 Group 31-40 Volume Subtotal 1 ,358,894 59,641 41 TRUAX ND - 4,011 1990 42 SEMINOLE TX - 7,106 1936 43 ALAMINOS CANYON BLK 857 (GREAT WHITE) Fed Gulf - 23,360 2002
  • 9. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 6 Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.) thousands of barrels of 42 U.S. gallons 2013 Rank Field Name Location 2013 Proved Reserves 2013 Estimated Production Discovery Year 44 LIN TX - 8,186 1984 45 CYMRIC CA - 14,306 1916 46 FUHRMAN-MASCHO TX - 7,277 1930 47 WARD-ESTES NORTH TX - 3,694 1927 48 LOST HILLS CA - 10,242 1910 49 EAST FORK ND - 2,476 1984 50 WEST SAK AK - 5,755 1969 Group 41-50 Volume Subtotal 1,140,424 86,413 51 SHO-VEL-TUM OK - 6,116 1905 52 WALKER RIDGE BLK 29 (BIG FOOT) Fed Gulf - - 2009 53 HOWARD-GLASSCOCK TX - 3,519 1925 54 REUNION BAY ND - 4,407 2008 55 SAN ARDO CA - 7,229 1947 56 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 503 (WHO DAT) Fed Gulf - 8,808 2007 57 ALGER ND - 8,294 2008 58 ANTELOPE ND - 3,737 1953 59 VENTURA CA - 5,115 1916 60 HOBBS NM & TX - 3,441 1928 Group 51-60 Volume Subtotal 71,942 50,666 61 BLUE BUTTES ND - 4,930 1955 62 GREEN CANYON BLK 903 (HEIDELBERG) Fed Gulf - - 2009 63 WALKER RIDGE BLK 627 (JULIA) Fed Gulf - - 2007 64 ALKALI CREEK ND - 2,348 1990 65 NIKAITCHUQ AK - 4,820 2004 66 HAWKVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 8,226 2009 67 WOLFBONE TREND TX - 3,925 2008 68 CAMP ND - 4,308 1982 69 GRAIL ND - 3,223 2008 70 CHARLSON ND - 2,563 1952 Group 61-70 Volume Subtotal 25,350 34,343 71 MILNE POINT AK - 6,730 1982 72 YATES TX - 7,484 1926 73 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 383 (NAKIKA - KEPLER) Fed Gulf - 21,206 1987 74 SACATE Fed Pacific - 3,093 1970 75 GREEN CANYON BLK 562 (K2) Fed Gulf - 3,586 2002 76 COALINGA CA - 5,660 1887 77 MCGREGORY BUTTES ND - 5,044 2008 78 PHANTOM TX - 10,421 1976 79 HASTINGS WEST TX - 2,032 1958 80 EMPIRE NM - 3,516 1945 Group 71-80 Volume Subtotal 13,225 68,772 81 KERN FRONT CA - 3,187 1925 82 GARDEN BANKS BLK 426 (AUGER) Fed Gulf - 2,415 1987 83 GARDEN CITY SOUTH TX - 3,464 1964 84 MURPHY CREEK ND - 5,111 1982
  • 10. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 7 Table 1. Top 100 U.S. oil fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.) thousands of barrels of 42 U.S. gallons 2013 Rank Field Name Location 2013 Proved Reserves 2013 Estimated Production Discovery Year 85 PINEDALE WY - 4,024 1955 86 GREATER ANETH UT - 4,131 1956 87 INGLEWOOD CA - 2,733 1924 88 GREEN CANYON BLK 683 (CAESAR - TONGA) Fed Gulf - 3,840 2006 89 FULLERTON TX - 4,010 1942 90 GIDDINGS TX - 8,247 1960 Group 81-90 Volume Subtotal 49,082 41,162 91 COWDEN NORTH TX - 3,378 1930 92 DORA ROBERTS TX - 1,790 1954 93 HOLT RANCH TX - 1,937 1954 94 JONAH WY - 2,270 1977 95 ROBINSON LAKE ND - 3,319 2006 96 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA - 2,251 1920 97 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 84 (KING - HORN MT.) Fed Gulf - 6,151 1999 98 POSO CREEK CA - 3,325 1929 99 WALKER RIDGE BLK 469 (CHINOOK) Fed Gulf - 2,326 2003 100 FORT TRINIDAD TX - 2,096 1952 Group 91-100 Volume Subtotal 99,726 28,843 Top 100 Oil Fields Volume Subtotal 20,608,237 1,333,372 Top 100 Percentage of U.S. Total 56.4% 48.9% U.S. TOTAL CRUDE OIL & LEASE CONDENSATE (2013) 36,520,000 2,729,000 Note: In some fields, only one or very few operators are the source of proved reserves estimates. Therefore, EIA does not provide field- specific proved reserves estimates in order to avoid compromising proprietary data. Instead, EIA combines the proved reserves estimates of the top 100 fields into groups of 10 to provide a sense of the operated concentration of total proved reserves, while still protecting data sources. Source of proved reserves and estimated production: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. Field production estimates are reported by operators. The estimated production total in this table differs slightly from the official EIA 2013 U.S. total production estimate (2,717,876,000 barrels). Source of field discovery years: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Field Code Master List 2013.
  • 11. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 8 Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013 million cubic feet at 14.73 psia and 60 degrees Fahrenheit 2013 Rank Field Name Location 2013 Proved Reserves 2013 Estimated Production Discovery Year 1 MARCELLUS SHALE AREA PA & WV - 2,836,043 2008 2 NEWARK EAST (BARNETT SHALE) TX - 1,951,750 1981 3 B-43 AREA (FAYETTEVILLE SHALE) AR - 1,025,153 2005 4 SAN JUAN BASIN GAS AREA CO & NM - 1,024,962 1927 5 HAYNESVILLE SHALE UNIT LA - 1,425,661 2008 6 PINEDALE WY - 568,153 1955 7 CARTHAGE TX - 653,093 1936 8 JONAH WY - 239,233 1977 9 WATTENBERG CO - 304,540 1970 10 PRUDHOE BAY AK - 147,554 1967 Group 1 -10 Volume Subtotal 144,614,724 10,176,142 11 SPRABERRY TREND AREA TX - 307,295 1949 12 EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 435,200 2009 13 BRISCOE RANCH (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 463,182 1962 14 NATURAL BUTTES UT - 277,901 1940 15 HUGOTON GAS AREA KS & OK & TX - 222,304 1922 16 MAMM CREEK CO - 133,950 1959 17 HAWKVILLE (EAGLE FORD SHALE) TX - 213,946 2008 18 ARDMORE OK - 5,191 1942 19 ANADARKO BASIN (WOODFORD) OK - 136,085 2008 20 FOGARTY CREEK WY - 29,127 1975 Group 11-20 Volume Subtotal 36,652,912 2,224,181 21 OWEN TX - 89,055 1968 22 LAKE RIDGE WY - 13,254 1981 23 SUGARKANE TX - 155,603 2009 24 WATONGA-CHICKASHA TREND OK - 123,653 1948 25 PRB COAL BED MT & WY - 303,385 1992 26 DE WITT TX - 97,866 1959 27 RULISON CO - 117,742 1958 28 GRAND VALLEY CO - 132,330 1985 29 ANTRIM (ANTRIM SHALE) MI - 102,076 1965 30 BIG SANDY KY & WV - 66,667 1926 Group 21 - 30 Volume Subtotal 16,501,143 1,201,631 31 STILES RANCH OK & TX - 138,838 1978 32 PARACHUTE CO - 98,863 1985 33 MADDEN WY - 74,301 1968 34 KNOX OK - 42,959 1916 35 GATES RANCH TX - 66,277 1968 36 OAKWOOD VA - 63,293 1990 37 RATON BASIN GAS AREA CO & NM - 110,491 1998 38 TERRYVILLE LA - 27,020 1959 39 LOWER MOBILE BAY AREA AL & Fed Gulf - 83,182 1979 40 GOLDEN TREND OK - 43,388 1945 Group 31-40 Volume Subtotal 10,615,858 748,612 41 WAYNESBURG PA - 10,364 1889 42 ARMENIA PA - 83,440 2008
  • 12. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 9 Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.) million cubic feet at 14.73 psia and 60 degrees Fahrenheit 2013 Rank Field Name Location 2013 Proved Reserves 2013 Estimated Production Discovery Year 43 BRUFF WY - 50,591 1969 44 BEAR GRASS TX - 54,309 1977 45 HERRICK PA - 79,854 2008 46 ELK HILLS CA - 88,681 1919 47 FREESTONE TX - 53,831 1949 48 PINE HOLLOW SOUTH OK - 62,443 1959 49 ELM GROVE LA - 33,742 1916 50 PARACHUTE NORTH CO - 52,247 2007 Group 41-50 Volume Subtotal 7,823,926 569,502 51 BUFFALO WALLOW TX - 56,351 1969 52 ECHO SPRINGS WY - 33,677 1976 53 CHAPITA WELLS UT - 2,351 1952 54 BIG RUN-BIRCHFIELD WV - 21,971 1905 55 NORA VA - 38,988 1949 56 WAMSUTTER WY - 39,529 1958 57 BALD PRAIRIE TX - 57,381 1976 58 OAK HILL TX - 60,051 1958 59 SAWYER TX - 39,768 1960 60 MAJORSVILLE PA & WV - 644 1905 Group 51-60 Volume Subtotal ,693,930 350,711 61 STRONG CITY DISTRICT OK - 53,679 1966 62 STANDARD DRAW WY - 30,235 1979 63 CASPIANA LA - 37,287 1925 64 JOHN AMORUSO TX - 24,567 2005 65 CHEROKEE WEST OK - 32,378 1956 66 WILD ROSE WY - 27,265 1975 67 AUBURN WV - 17,781 1923 68 FRENCHIE DRAW WY - 19,904 1961 69 RILEY RIDGE WY - 50 1980 70 GIDDINGS TX - 64,523 1960 Group 61-70 Volume Subtotal 5,223,468 307,669 71 WASSON TX - 31,042 1937 72 COALGATE NE OK - 21,611 2003 73 YELLOWJACKET CO - 62,381 2009 74 BEND NORTH PA - 2,343 1951 75 RED WASH UT - 13,738 1959 76 GOLDSMITH TX - 24,538 1935 77 FARRAR TX - 40,429 1963 78 TIP TOP WY - 11,069 1928 79 TRAIL WY - 15,478 1958 80 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 854 (URSA) Fed Gulf - 27,984 1991 Group 71-80 Volume Subtotal 4,269,831 250,613 81 LOVE RANCH CO - 29,322 1999 82 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLK 807 (MARS) Fed Gulf - 20,458 1989 83 LIN TX - 29,391 1984 84 MOUNDSVILLE WV - 23,839 1887
  • 13. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 10 Table 2. Top 100 U.S. gas fields as of December 31, 2013 (cont.) million cubic feet at 14.73 psia and 60 degrees Fahrenheit 2013 Rank Field Name Location 2013 Proved Reserves 2013 Estimated Production Discovery Year 85 MENDOTA NW TX - 40,467 1962 86 LIPSCOMB OK & TX - 37,358 1957 87 TIERNEY WY - 14,006 1973 88 VEGA NORTH CO - 19,718 1977 89 KEATHLEY CANYON BLK 964 (HADRIAN SOUTH) Fed Gulf - - 2009 90 MAYFIELD NE OK - 37,569 1951 Group 81-90 Volume Subtotal 3,787,022 252,128 91 HILLTOP RESORT TX - 23,585 2007 92 GRUGAN PA - 33,952 1982 93 BELLEVERNON PA - 4,062 1887 94 GARDEN CITY SOUTH TX - 14,345 1964 95 VERNON LA - 23,978 1967 96 PENNSBORO-TOLLGATE WV - 11,046 - 97 SHO-VEL-TUM OK - 24,449 1905 98 TEAGUE (CV-BOSSIER CONS.) TX - 32,319 1945 99 PICEANCE CREEK CO - 26,326 1930 100 ALAMINOS CANYON BLK 857 (GREAT WHITE) Fed Gulf - 34,350 2002 Group 91-100 Volume Subtotal 3,473,473 228,412 TOP 100 GAS FIELDS VOLUME SUBTOTAL 239,656,287 16,309,601 Top 100 Percentage of U.S. Total 67.7% 61.6% U.S. TOTAL NATURAL GAS (2013) 353,994,000 26,467,000 Note: In some fields, only one or very few operators are the source of proved reserves estimates. Therefore EIA does not provide field- specific proved reserves estimates in order to avoid compromising proprietary data. Instead, EIA combines the proved reserves estimates of the top 100 fields into groups of 10 to provide a sense of the operated concentration of total proved reserves, while still protecting data sources. Marcellus Shale Area was calculated from estimates of shale gas of Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Source of proved reserves and estimated production: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-23L, Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, 2013. The estimated production total in this table differs slightly from the official EIA 2013 U.S. marketed gas production estimate (27,259,815,000,000 cubic feet). Source of field discovery years: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Field Code Master List 2013.
  • 14. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 11 Top 100 fields location maps Locations of the top 100 oil and gas fields of 2013 are shown on the following maps. Many fields appear on both maps because they have significant volumes of both hydrocarbons.
  • 15. April 2015 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Top 100 U.S. Oil and Gas Fields 12