The Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma Somatic Experiencing from Dysregulation to Coherence

Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma…
RUNNING HEADER: Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma
The Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma
Somatic Experiencing from Dysregulation to Coherence
By: Mike Changaris, Psy.D.

Abstract
Touch plays a vital role in the building of the brain, the mind, and the self.
For the first years of life, touch is one of the main modes of communication
between infants and caregivers. The limbic-touch system can be accessed to
create effective safe treatments for trauma. Touch therapies including massage
have been shown to reduce cortisol, symptoms of depression, and anxiety as well
as increase dopamine, oxytocin (social bonding hormone), serotonin, parent infant
bonding, and relational satisfaction (Field, et al., 1997; Field, et. al., 2008;
Kurosawa, Lundeberg, Agren, Lund, & Uvnas-Moberg, 1995; Walach, Guthlin, &
Konig, 2003; Field, Seligman, Scafidi, & Schanberg, 1996;). This paper discusses
the neurobiology of trauma and touch systems offering an affect regulation based
approach to conceptualizing touch treatment. The field of psychology would
benefit from providing guidelines on the use of ethical touch so that clinicians can
develop treatment modalities and receive the necessary supervision to provide
safe effective touch interventions.

The Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma
Somatic Experiencing from Dysregulation to Coherence
From the rough and tumble play of five-year-old children to a mother’s
caresses, touch plays a vital role in the building of the brain, the mind, and the
self. The well-known studies on touch deprivation of infants in orphanages point
out that touch is as vital as food for human existence (Juhan, 1998). Dean Juhan
(1998) in his book Job’s Body states the skin is an extension of the brain. A child
learns about himself through the way he makes contact with the world. Our
earliest contact is through touch. For the first years of life, touch is one of the
main modes of communication between infants and caregivers.
Touch can either be damaging — for instance, abuse — or profoundly
loving, as in the skin-on-skin contact of an infant with his care providers. When
we touch one another we send a profound cascade of chemical reactions into
motion, such as the secretion of oxytocin, a hormone responsible for social
bonding, safety, and pain reduction. Touch can be a double-edged sword in
trauma treatment. It can simultaneously be a profound trigger of threat and be a
container creating safety.
Adults who experience traumatic events display fundamental adaptations
in their neurophysiology. Bowlby (1976) describes how as a child develops there
can be moments when his development veers of course. Shore (2002) noted that
these developmental interruptions can be seen as disruptions in brain function and
structure. But the disrupted brain development can be reformed and regulation
restored in proper therapeutic environment. According to affect regulation theory,

there are means to re-establish regulation in the brain, body, and self. Touch,
being a major communicator of affect, could play a large role in providing the
experience dependent maturation processes for the growth of brain functions
missed in development. Understanding the neurobiology of touch, trauma and
dysregulation could help the clinician creat effective touch based interventions.
Key Brain Regions in Affect Regulation
Hypothalamus Pituitary Adrenal-axis (HPA-axis). The HPA-axis is a cascade
of chemical events. The HPA-axis is made up of the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and
adrenal cortex (which sits right above the kidney’s) (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008).
Its main task is to mobilize a powerful energetic defense when a person is threatened and
to return to rest when the threat is gone. It has been hypothesized that either functional or
structural changes in the HPA underlie the development of PTSD. A simplified
explanation of the HPA-axis activity is as follows: when a stress is recognized, the
hypothalamus secretes corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH). CRH then stimulates the
production of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in the pituitary gland. ACTH makes
its way down to the adrenal cortex, where it triggers the production of cortisol
(Blumenfeld, 2002). Cortisol mobilizes a threat response. Cortisol then triggers the
hypothalamus to stop producing CRH and thus ends the production of cortisol. In systems
theory this is called a negative feedback loop. Touch based interventions could help
restore regulation to this system.
The hypothalamus is responsible for circadian rhythms, endocrine secretion, heart
rate (HR), breath rate, thirst, hunger, thermoregulation, and maintaining homeostasis. It
also controls aspects of growth hormone production, dopamine, vasopressin in men and

oxitocyn in women (Blumenfeld, 2002). Early experiences including maternal touch
sculpt HPA-axis reactivity and the rate of stress hormone secretion over a lifetime.
Therapeutic touch has been noted to reduce cortisol reaction, increase oxytocin
production and personal satisfaction with relationships between parents as well as with
children. Increased levels of oxytocin have been associated with social engagement and
maternal behaviors. Therapeutic touch has been shown to increase sleep, reduce over-
activation in cortisol, increase dopamine levels, and lead to a reduction of aggression.
Thalamus. The thalamus is a relay station for the brain (Blumenfeld, 2002). It
receives information and sends information to the entire brain. This is the first center of
the brain where information about touch is processed. It plays a large role in level of
arousal. A damaged thalamus can result in a coma. Recent theorists have postulated that
the thalamus may be the seat of human consciousness (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson,
2008). The thalamus in monkeys goes through a heightened maturation process between
birth and 30 weeks after gestation. The thalamus plays a role in brain activation and could
play a role in organizing the interaction between structures that are not physically
contiguous (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). Sensory information from touch
reaches the cortex through connections in the thalamus.
Hippocampus. The hippocampus is found in the medial temporal lobe (Zillmer,
Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). There have been three major theories used to conceptualize
hippocampus functioning. These three theories are that the hippocampus is involved in:
behavioral inhibition, declarative memory consolidation, and sense of place. In
individuals diagnosed with PTSD, hippocampus declines have been noted to be more
significant in the posterior hippocampus region and bilaterally (Bremner, et al., 1995).

Significant Hippocampal decline was noted for those with Dissociative Identity Disorder
(DID), one study found a 26% decline compared with controls (Vermetten, Schmahl,
Lindner, Loewenstein, Bremner, 2006). No studies were found linking hippocampal
growth with touch therapies. However, touch reduces cortisol production and high levels
of cortisol production leads to loss of hippocampal volume that can be reversed in
Cushing’s syndrome with the re-regulation of cortisol (Starkmana, Giordanib, Gebarskic,
Berentb, Schorke, & Schteingartd, 1999). Increased levels of apoptosis (program cell
death) down regulators (protection) have been associated with levels of maternal touch in
certain mammals (Weaver, Grant, & Meaney, 2002).
Amygdala. Amygdala is often known as the fear center of the brain. Although it
could be better conceptualized as a smoke detector. It notices changes, but not
specifically danger. The amygdala becomes nearly fully developed by the age of one
year. Early in life it plays a role in the infant’s indiscriminant impulsive drive to social
interaction (Joseph, 1999). Touch has been shown to have strong links to the amygdala,
the insula, and other limbic structures (Friedman, Murray, O'Neill, & Mishkin, 2004).
The amygdala is involved in classical conditioning and emotional memory (Blumenfeld,
2002). Heightened arousal triggers stable memory formation. An fMRI study found no
volumetric differences between those who meet the criteria for PTSD and those who did
not (Bremner et al., 1995). An fMRI study found function changes (e.g., more activation)
in individuals who met the criteria for PTSD in the amygdala and the insular cortex
compared to controls. Individuals with a diagnosis of DID were found to have a 19.2%
reduction in AMY volume compared to controls (Vermetten, Schmahl, Lindner,
Loewenstein, & Bremner, 2006).

Insula. The insula is a part of the limbic cortex (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson,
2008). The limbic cortex is the higher cortical functioning area of the limbic circuitry.
The insula has been postulated to be involved in the felt-experience of introceptive cues
from the body, viscera, appetite, and addiction (Schore, 2002 ). The insula has been
found to play a role in the integration of body sensation of the primary emotions such as
anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust (Lamm, 2010; Schore, 2002). It also plays a role in
hunger. It has connections with the amygdala and the orbital frontal cortex through
connections with the thalamus (Blumenfeld, 2002). FMRI studies have found a strong
relationship between activation of the neurons in the insula and craving. Touch in
combination with the individual’s attention has been shown to activate the insula in fMRI
studies (Friedman, Murray, O'Neill, & Mishkin, 2004). The insula registers both painful
touch and pleasant touch (Francis, et al., 1999). In a study of individuals who survived a
fire, a reduction of gray matter was found in both the right and the left insula, the left
hippocampus, and left anterior cingulate gyrus.
Cingulate gyrus. The cingulate gyrus is often referred to as the limbic cortex
(Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). It is the area directly above the corpus coliseum. It
develops between three to nine months (Joseph, 1999). At three to nine months of
development, the infant grows the ability to modulate social engagement through
immobility and withdrawing (noradrenalin) and active protection through fight/flight
(dopamine-excitatory system) (Schore, 2002). It is organized in to three main areas: the
anterior, medial, and the posterior region. The anterior is discussed here and is related to
autonomic homeostasis, reward anticipation; heart rate, decision-making, emotions, and
modeling the emotions of others (Blumenfeld, 2002). It plays a central role in integration

of bottom up and top down neural processes. The cingulate gyrus is involved in the
limbic touch circuit (Friedman, Murray, O'Neill, & Mishkin, 2004). It mediates both
pleasant and unpleasant (painful) touch (Rolls, O’Doherty, Kringelbach, Francis,
Bowtell, & McGlone, 2003). These areas are separate and can act independently. Current
theory of the ACC postulates that it monitors internal and external behavior, attends to
mistakes, and seeks to make the behavioral outcome more successful. Damage to the
ACC results in inability to self-monitor, behavioral impulsivity, and inattention. In some,
stimulation of the ACC relieved depression.
Orbital frontal cortex. The orbital frontal cortex (OFC) is the “emotion and
reward” area of the prefrontal cortex. This is likely the most abstract area of emotional
processing (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). It is also the last to mature. It reaches
full maturity in the early twenties. It is involved in decision making and expectation.
Posterior OFC regulates sensory experiences such as touch (Blumenfeld, 2002). Anterior
regions monitor abstract categories such as status or money. The medial portions were
found to monitor and regulate positive experiences. The lateral portions regulate and
attend to noxious stimulus or punishment (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). Some
studies have found the OFC plays a role in intuition or holistic processing (Schore, 2002).
The medial portion also plays a large role in self-monitoring. Damage to the OFC can
lead to hypersexuality, increased addictive behaviors, poor social skills, disinhibition, and
lack of empathy (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). The OFC is one of the areas of the
brain that changes most over a lifetime. Long time mediators have more cells in the OFC
than controls. Pleasant touch increases activation in the OFC and thus likely increases the
regulation of more uncomfortable interceptive events (Friedman, Murray, O'Neill, &

Mishkin, 2004; Rolls, O’Doherty, Kringelbach, Francis, Bowtell, & McGlone, 2003).
Basal Ganglia (BG). The basal ganglia plays several key roles in the brain and
behavior. These are modulation of movement, emotional set, anticipation of movement,
eye movement, motivation, and reward (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). Largely the
basal ganglion exerts an inhibitory control on other systems (Blumenfeld, 2002). If it
releases that inhibition, then the body moves. The BG contains a topographic map of the
entire brain. The organization of this map is still unclear because the basal ganglia is
likely organized in three-dimensional space, while the brain is organized in layers. The
main neurotransmitters in the basal ganglia are GABA, dopamine, and acetylcholine.
GABA is the main inhibitory transmitter in the brain. Dopamine modulates salience,
reward, motivation, and movement. Acetylcholine is a central modulator of
neuroplasticity and attention. The ventral tegmental area plays a role in the reward system
of the brain mediating motivation or the appetitive aspects of behavior. If this system is
damaged in a mouse’s brain, it will not eat food if it is beside it, but will eat it if placed
in its mouth. Overactive appetitive functions have been implicated in multiple addictions,
ranging from gambling to cocaine addition (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). The BG
is also involved in force selection, planning of motor movements, initiation of motor
plans, and the extrapyramidal (modulating fine motor control) motor system
(Blumenfeld, 2002; Vaillancourta, Yua, Maykab, & Corcosa, 2007). Physical touch
increases neurotransmitter production key for basal ganglia functioning.
Septal Nucleus. Plays a role in pleasure, relaxation and rest. It has an inhibitory
effect of cortisol. It has been shown to have a role in the antidepressant effects of
progesterone through the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. The septal nucleus is

involved in sexuality (direct stimulation creates penile or clitoral erection). The septal
nucleus develops later than the amygdala and the cingulate gyrus at about three years of
age (Joseph, 1999). In early development, the amygdala pushes the infant toward
indiscriminant social contact. As the child develops, the septal nucleus provides
regulation for amygdalar impulses. Stressful touch to rats increased the septal nucleus
secretion of dopamine and activation of the hypothalamic circuits (Albert, & Chew,
2004). This regulatory function is lost if the septal nucleus is damaged. In rat pups, a
damaged septal nucleus leads to increased aggression and loss of maternal behaviors.
Neurobiology of Touch
There are four major classes of touch pathways to the brain (Blumenfeld,
2002). Two of these pathways are wide and myelinated, which makes them able
to deliver their signals to the brain quickly. These pathways deliver sensations of
deep pressure, light touch, joint position, muscle tension, vibration, hair
movement, and proprioception. Two of these pathways are unmyelinated, have a
narrow diameter of the axon, and deliver their messages slowly, conveying
information about pain and temperature. The pain pathways can be overridden by
the wider myelinated pathways of deep touch, vibration, proprioception, and so on
(Blumenfeld, 2002).
There are three major sensory motor tracts going from the periphery to the
brain (Blumenfeld, 2002). These are the lateral cortical spinal tract, which is
primarily a motor pathway from the brain to the body; the posterior columns,
which are a sensory pathway conveying joint position, vibration, and fine

discriminatory touch; and the anterior columns, which are also primarily a sensory
pathway conveying pain temperature and crude touch. These nerve pathways all
have a rough somatotropic organization (e.g., certain areas relate to certain body
parts).
The anterior columns also break into three major sensory tracts that each
play a critical role in pain and sense of self (Blumenfeld, 2002). The
spinoreticular track is the philogentically oldest of these pathways. It goes from
the spine to the reticular activating system. This system is a major body regulator
of level of conscious arousal. This pathway mediates the emotional arousal
aspects of pain and the motivation to stop the pain. When a person stubs her toe,
this information is read by the brain as, “ouch.” The spinothalamic tract goes from
the spine and to the thalamus. It conveys information to the brain about specific
areas of pain, sensation, and temperature. This area can localize the pain to a
given region. This area is the one that makes a person say, “I stubbed my toe!”
The third area is the spinomesencephalic tract. This tract, through communication,
is responsible for modulating and reducing the pain response mediated by
serotonin and opiates produced endogenously. When this area comes on line, one
might state, “My toe feels better.”
Once the information gets into the cortex, it moves to the primary sensory motor
strip. This area is organized somatotropically (e.g., one brain area is related to one part of
the body) (Blumenfeld, 2002). The brain typically has three areas of sensory processing.
The first receives raw sensation, the second integrates sensation with previous
experience, and the third forms higher abstract concepts related to the sensory input

(Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). Stimulating the primary sensory-motor strip causes
sensation or movement of a particular area. If the primary sensory motor strip is
damaged, muscles contract in a spasm. Damage to the secondary motor area leads to loss
of: a. the urge to move (basal ganglia), b. organized patterns of movement, and c.
emotional drives for movement. Damage to the secondary sensory area can lead to a.
difficulty localizing and integrating sensory input and b. losing propreaceptive input,
such that the person feels lost in space. If the tertiary area is damaged, higher order
sensory integration is lost (Zillmer, Spiers & Culbertson, 2008). It is important to note
that the human experience of sensation is an integrated one. The sensation of touch does
not happen in a vacuum. The felt experience of touch includes vision of the touch, sound,
smells and temperature. If the touch is traumatic it can include activation of the figh,
flight or freeze system. According to Somatic Experiencing theory disruptions in the
integration of sensory modalities occurs in trauma. A key region for this integration for
touch with other senses is in the superior temporal sulcus (Beauchampa, Yasara, Fryec,
& Rod, 2008).
Touch and Emotions
Touch is one of the most understudied senses, yet it can be a profound
communicator of emotion. In human relationship there is a dance of meaning driven by
the synchrony of non-verbal emotional communication. Paul Eckman, the pioneer in the
study of emotions, discovered that facial expressions of emotion were universal across
cultures, wired into the emotional systems and follow regular patterns. Recent studies
have found the same is true with touch (Hertenstein, Holmes, McCullough, & Keltner,

2009). Several studies have shown that people can identify multiple emotions through
physical touch such as anger, fear, disgust, love, gratitude, and sympathy via touch with a
high degree of accuracy. Other studies have shown that people can decode emotional
information communicated by touch by simply watching touch on a film (Hertenstein,
Holmes, McCullough, & Keltner, 2009; Keysers, Wicker, Gazzola, Anton, Fogassi &
Gallese, 2004).
Neurobiology of Dysregulation
The body and mind are full of rhythms, from the daily rhythm of sleep to waking,
to the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion. Dysregulation occurs when the normal
coherent relationship between these patterns is disrupted in such a way that the brain or
mind has difficulty returning to its normal homeostatic range (Liberzon, Taylor, Fig, &
Koeppe, 1998). In Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), there is an upregulation of the
threat system such that it triggers a dissociative shutdown, it over-produces stress
hormones, reacts too intensely to triggers, or it is triggered too easily to produce stress
hormones (Levine & Fredrick, 1998).
There are two major forms of psychological dysregulation. These are
developmental dysregulation and event-based dysregulation. Developmental
dysregulation occurs when there are either disruptions in the developmental environment
or physical systems of the brain leading to altered growth in the cortical structures,
hormones, neurotransmitters, or the relationship between structures (De Bellis et al.,
2002; Penza, Heim, & Nemeroff, 2003; Schore, 2002). If a child misses the processes
that lead to the maturation of the septal nucleus, that child could display impulsivity and

tendency to socialize indiscriminately, and the cortical structures that myelinated after the
development of the septal nucleus could display disruptions functioning as well.
Although, there has been a call for the diagnosis of developmental trauma by Bessel Van
Der Kolk and others, it is yet to be included in the DSM-V.
The second main form of dysregulation happens in a catalyzing event, through
which the brain and self undergo fundamental functional alterations. There are two major
types of dysregulation in the event based PTSD literature; over-activation and under-
activation. Over-activation reflects an upregulation of stress hormone production and an
under-activation of cortical structures, which regulate stress. In the hyperarousal/re-
experiencing type of dysregulation in an fMRI study Lanius (2008) found over activation
in the insula (bringing extreme amounts of information from the body’s interceptive
cues), an under-activation of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and medial prefrontal
cortex (mPFC) (areas needed to regulate the body sensations brought up from the insula).
In essence, the hyperaroused individual floods with information from the body and has
less capacity to regulate the intense sensation. The hypoarousal/ avoidant type on the
other hand, displays flattening of physical sensations from the insula and increased
activation in the ACC and mPFC. In the hypoarousal type, only a small amount of
interceptive cues get into the limbic cortex and are quickly squelched by cortical
structures, leaving the individual feeling disconnected, emotionally flat, and dissociated.
A study assessing two tendencies found that 70% of individuals with PTSD displayed
heightened stress hormone secretion to a trauma script. This same study found that 30%
of individuals sampled had a reduction in their stress hormone secretion. The
hyperarousal reaction to trauma is related to the re-experiencing symptom cluster, while

the hypoarousal reaction is related to the numbing and avoidance cluster.
Another model of dysregulation was proposed by Dr. Porges, and called the
polyvagal theory (Porges, Doussard-Roosevelt, & Maiti, 1994; Porges, 1995). In the
traditional model of the autonomic nervous system there are two branches, sympathetic
(fight/flight reactivity) and parasympathetic (resting state). When looking at the
autonomic nervous system, Porges noted that there were two types of neurons in the
parasympathetic branch, one that is myelinated, fast-acting and evolutionarily newer
(Ventral Vagal, VVC), the other unmyeolinated, slow-acting and evolutionarily older
(dorsal motor nucleus or DMNX). He proposed that the older system, present in lizards,
leads to a defensive response called freezing. According to his theory, mammals are
dependant on their parents during childhood and need to remain at rest when safe.
According to polyvagal theory, the newer myelinated branch (VVC) of the
parasympathetic branch mediates the sense of safety in social engagement. In a stressful
event, the normal social engagement system disengages and the sympathetic system leads
to fight/flight activation, but over time the system returns to rest. In a traumatic event,
according to Porges, the social engagement system disengages, fight/flight activation
occurs, and the older parasympathetic system (DMNX) shuts down the system, inducing
tonic immobility (freeze response). According to somatic experiencing theory, if the
nervous system is given time to complete the freeze response and the mobilized defensive
response (fight/flight) the individual will not develop symptoms of PTSD (Levine, &
Frederick, 1997). If however, these factors do not complete, the high arousal continues
and the individual begins to adapt to the dysregulation by displaying symptoms of PTSD.
In SE theory, the return of social engagement behavior can indicate a re-regulation of the

nervous system. Some indications of social engagement are the inner ear tuning to the
range of the human voice, breathing becoming slow and smooth, orienting towards the
therapist, and the individual growing curious about his or her environment (Foundation
for Human Enrichment, 2007).
Touch in Therapy
Just as touch plays a profound role in the development of the child, it can play a
profound role in the regulation of the nervous system. Therapeutic touch has been shown
to decrease cortisol production, substance P (mediating pain responses), increase
dopamine, serotonin, and oxytocin production (known to mediate maternal behaviors,
attachment and partner boding) (Field, et al., 1997; Field, et. al., 2008; Field, Seligman,
Scafidi, & Schanberg, 1996; Kurosawa, Lundeberg, Agren, Lund, & Uvnas-Moberg,
1995; Walach, Guthlin, & Konig, 2003). In infants it has been shown to increase birth
weight, cortical development, length of the infant, reduce asymmetry between frontal
lobes (associated with depression), increase the ability to self-soothe, and re-regulate
cardiac vagal tone (an indication or autonomic regulation) (Ferber, Laudon, Kuint,
Weller, & Zisapel, 2002; Field, et al., 1997; Field et. al., 1998; Matthiesen, Ransjo-
Arvidson, Nissen, & Uvnas-Moberg, 2001). In parents, it has been shown to increase the
quality of their relationship, infant-parent synchrony, perception of partner support,
reduce frontal lobe asymmetry, and reduce the effects of post-partum depression (Cullen,
Field, Escalona, & Hartshorn, 2000; Field, et. al., 1996; Latifses, Estroff, Field, & Bush,
2005). Massage has been shown to reduce symptoms of depression, state anxiety, and
PTSD (Field, Seligman, Scafidi, & Schanberg, 1996; Field, et al., 1997).

Touch is as vital as food and can affect multiple neurobiological systems that are
targets of anti-depressants, anxiolytic medications. Having one positive emotion after a
stressful event or the experience of a triggering event can speed the reduction of cortisol
levels, and reduce physiological indicators of stress. Soothing, safe touch can be an
effective means to provide an experience of safety, evoke the relaxation response and for
some positive emotions (Fredrickson, Mancuso, Branigan, & Tugade, 2000).
Through the visuotactile mirroring mechanism, people model each other’s
emotions and experiences by integrating touch and vision (Ebisch, Perrucci, Ferretti, Del
Gratta, Romani, & Gallese, 2008). The touch-vision integration system includes, the
secondary somatosensory cortex bilaterally, “left inferior parietal lobule , supramarginal
gyrus, bilateral temporal-occipital junction, and left precentral gyrus. Interestingly the
sight of intentional touch correlated directly with the… left primary somatosensory
cortex (Ebisch, Perrucci, Ferretti, Del Gratta, Romani, & Gallese, 2008).” Researchers
hypothesized that the intentional touch system mediates the experience of resonating with
another and the non-intentional mediates contact with objects.
Neurobiological Model of a Touch Intervention for Trauma
Touch can be used in several ways to reduce the symptoms of trauma (Francis, et
al., 1999; Friedman, Murray, O'Neill, & Mishkin, 2004; Rolls, Bilderbeck, & McGlone,
2008; Rolls, O’Doherty, Kringelbach, Francis, Bowtell, & McGlone, 2003). These are: a.
to re-establish the regulation of the autonomic nervous system, b. to desensitize
individuals to trauma triggers, c. to increase the ability to attend to interceptive cues from
the body, d. to reduce fight/flight activation, and d. support the growth of emotion

regulation centers in the brain.
There are three main types of affect regulation. These are: a. cognitive regulation
(deciding to use an affect regulation skill), b. co-regulation (regulation through the
interaction with another person or animal), and c. auto-regulation (internalized regulation
or automatic regulation processes). When the cortical structures used in affect regulation
are stable enough to manage current levels of activation of the limbic structures there is a
natural smooth transition from arousal to rest. It is this last that is the focus of clinical
treatment. Touch can play a large role in each of these types of regulation.
Touch can be used in cognitive regulation by the clinician teaching a skill and the
client practicing the skill. A skill might be to use self-touch to reduce activation. The
client might evoke the orienting response and parasympathetic rest through placing his
hand on his heart and noticing the sensations. Other tools could be to stand in a warm
shower and notice the comfort, massaging one’s feet, pressing feet into the ground, or
placing the hands over the eyes. In this type of regulation individuals choose to use a
conscious skill to move their sub-cortical systems.
Co-regulation falls into two categories. The first is regulation through indirect
mirroring, such as from mirror neuron system or the ACC’s modeling of the emotions of
others and second is the regulation provided through direct therapeutic intervention.
Touch can play a role in both. When the clinician’s ability to read emotions through
touch is good and her body can respond supplely to her client’s emotions, physical
contact can be an excellent way of mirroring or providing attunement. When the client’s
activation goes up, the contact with the therapist can provide a regulatory boundary
helping the stress levels to reduce to within the client’s ability to tolerate the activation.

Through the process of contained activation, the cortical structures responsible for
emotion regulation grow (Schore, 2008). As the client’s mind replays emotional ruptures
from the past, touch can provide an experiential repair and a restructuring of the event.
Touch has been shown to reduce cortisol levels, increase activation in pleasure centers of
the insula, and increase activation in the orbital medial prefrontal cortex (Friedman,
Murray, O'Neill, & Mishkin, 2004; Rolls, O’Doherty, Kringelbach, Francis, Bowtell, &
McGlone, 2003).
Auto-regulation is the current innate capacity of an individual to regulate his
levels of limbic and autonomic activation (Schore, 2002). Through the internalization of
the therapist as a safe mentalized regulator of affect by changing the ACC and its ability
to model and play back emotional events, the client builds new regulatory possibilities.
The interaction patterns between a therapist providing safe, contained model of self-
regulation and the client reduces for the client the number of conflicts their ACC needs to
monitors through its conflict monitoring function and the number of number of emotional
exchanges with a successful outcomes. Neurons that fire together wire together. As the
therapist coaxes the client’s orbital frontal cortex online through safe touch and emotional
mirroring through touch, these areas likely are strengthened. The safe contact with the
therapist could allow for increased ability of the client to tolerate his interceptive
responses to events and thus allows him to be available to a wider range affect with out
dysregulating and be an active participant in a wider range of life experiences. As a new-
felt experience of contact with one’s physical form and physical contact with a self–
regulating other is internalized, the individual has the ability to auto-regulate through
touch.

Conclusion
Touch is as vital as food, not simply to children but also adults (Juhan, 1998).
Touch has been shown to be an excellent communicator of emotions, lead to improved
parenting relationships, reduce cortisol production, physical pain, symptoms of
depression, PTSD and anxiety (Field, et al., 1997; Francis, et al., 1999; Friedman,
Murray, O'Neill, & Mishkin, 2004; Rolls, Bilderbeck, & McGlone, 2008; Rolls,
O’Doherty, Kringelbach, Francis, Bowtell, & McGlone, 2003). Touch can be an effective
intervention in clinical practice that leads to profound changes not simply in
psychological processing, but the physical structures of the brain. The field of psychology
would benefit from providing guidelines on the use of ethical touch so that clinicians can
develop treatment modalities and receive the necessary supervision to provide safe
effective touch interventions.
References
Albert, D. J., & Chew, G. L. (2004). The septal forebrain and the inhibitory modulation

of attack and defense in the rat. Behavioral and Neurobiology, 30(4), 357-388.
Bremner, J., Randall, P., Scott, T., Bronen, R., Seibyl, J., Southwick, S., Delaney, R.,
McCarthy, G., Charney C., and Innis, R., (1995). MRI-based measurement of
hippocampal volume in patients with combat- related posttraumatic stress disorder.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 973-981.
Beauchampa, M., Yasara, N. E., Fryec, R. E., & Rod, T. (2008). Touch, sound and
vision in human superior temporal sulcus. NeuroImage, 41(3),1011-1020.
Bowlby, J., (1976). Separation, Anxiety and Anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Cullen, C., Field, T., Escalona, A. & Hartshorn, K. (2000). Father-infant interactions are
enhanced by massage therapy. Early Child Development and Care, 164, 41-47.
De Bellis, M., Keshavana, M., Shifflettb, H., Iyengarb, S., Beersa, S., Halla. J., and
Moritza. J., (2002). Brain structures in pediatric maltreatment-related
posttraumatic stress disorder: a sociodemographically matched study, University
of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh.
Ebisch, S. J. H., Perrucci, M. G., Ferretti, A., Del Gratta, C., Romani, G. L., & Gallese,
V., (2008). The Sense of Touch: Embodied Simulation in a Visuotactile Mirroring
Mechanism for Observed Animate or Inanimate Touch. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 20(9), 1611-1623. (doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20111).
Ferber, S.G., Laudon, M., Kuint, J., Weller, A., & Zisapel, N. (2002). Massage therapy
by mothers enhances the adjustment of circadian rhythms to the nocturnal period in
full-term infants. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 23, 410-
415.
Field, T., Grizzle, N., Scafidi, F. Abrams, S., Richardson, S., Kuhn, C., & Schanberg, S.

(1996). Massage therapy for infants of depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and
Development, Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 107-112.
Field, T., Schanberg, S., Kuhn, C., Field, T., Fierro, K., Henteleff, T., Mueller, C.,
Yando, R., Shaw, S. & Burman, I. (1998). Bulimic adolescents benefit from
massage therapy. Adolescence, 33, 555-563.
Field, T., Seligman, S., Scafidi, F., & Schanberg, S. (1996). Alleviating post-traumatic
stress in children following Hurricane Andrew. Journal of Applied
Developmental Psychology, 17, 37-50.
Field, T, Sunshine, W., Hernandez-Reif, M., Quintino, O., Schanberg, S., Kuhn, C., &
Burman, I. (1997). Chronic fatigue syndrome: massage therapy effects on
depression and somatic symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Chronic
Fatigue Syndrome, 3, 43-51.
Francis, S., Rolls, E. T., Bowtell, R., McGlone, F., O'Doherty, J., Browning, A., Clare,
S., & Smith, E. (1999). The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its
relationship with taste and olfactory areas. Cognitive Neuroscience. 10(3), pp.
453-459.
Fredrickson, B., Mancuso, R., Branigan, C., & Tugade, M. (2000). The undoing effect of
positive emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 24(4), 237-258.
Friedman, D., Murray, E., O'Neill, B., & Mishkin, M. (2004). Cortical connections of the
somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of macaques: Evidence for a
corticolimbic pathway for touch. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 252(3),
323–347.
Hertenstein, M. J., Holmes, R., McCullough, M., & Keltner, D. (2009). The

communication of emotion via touch. Emotion, 9, 566-573.
Joseph, R. (1999). Environmental Influences on Neural Plasticity, the Limbic System,
Emotional Development and Attachment: A Review. Child Psychiatry and Human
Development, 29(3), 189-208. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022660923605.
Juhan, D. (1998). Job’s Body: A Handbook for Bodywork. New York, NY: Barrytown
Limited.
Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V.(2004). A
Touching Sight. Neuron. 42(2), 335-346, doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00156-4.
Kurosawa, M., Lundeberg, T., Agren, G., Lund, I., & Uvnas-Moberg, K. (1995).
Massage-like stroking of the abdomen lowers blood pressure in anesthetized rats:
influence of oxytocin. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System, 56, 26-30.
Lanius, R., & Hopper, J., (2008). Reexperiencing/Hyperaroused and Dissociative States
in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Functional Brain Imaging Research—and Clinical
Implications, Psychiatric Times. 25(13).
Lamm, C., (2010). The role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions. Journal Brain
Structure and Function, 214(5-6), 1863-2661. DOI10.1007/s00429-010-0251-3.
Latifses, V., Estroff, D. B., Field, T., & Bush, J. P. (2005). Father massaging and relaxing
their pregnant wives lowered anxiety and facilitated marital adjustment. Journal
of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 9, 277-82.
Levine, P. & Frederick, A. (1997). Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma The Innate
Capacity to Transform Overwhelming Experiences. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic
Books.
Liberzon, I., Taylor, S. F., Fig, L. M., & Koeppe, R. A., (1998). Alteration of

corticothalamic perfusion ratios during a PTSD flashback. Depression and
Anxiety, 4(3), pp 146–150.
Matthiesen, A.S., Ransjo-Arvidson, A.B., Nissen, E. & Uvnas-Moberg, K. (2001).
Postpartum maternal oxytocin release by newborns: effects of infant hand massage
and sucking. Birth, 28, 13-9.
Penza, K., Heim, C., & Nemeroff, C. (2003). Neurobiological effects of childhood abuse:
implications for the pathophysiology of depression and anxiety. Archives of
Women's Mental Health, 6(1), 15–22. DOI: 10.1007/s00737-002-0159-x.
Porges, S. (1995). Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our
evolutionary heritage. A Polyvagal Theory. Journal of Psychophysiology, 32(4),
301-318.
Porges, S. W., Doussard-Roosevelt, J. A., & Maiti, A. K. (1994). Vagal tone and the
physiological regulation of emotion. Emotion regulation: Behavioral and
biological considerations. Monographs for the Society for Research on Child
Development, 59(2-3), pp. 167-186.
Rolls, E. T., O’Doherty, J., Kringelbach, M. L., Francis, S., Bowtell, R., & McGlone, F.
(2003). Representations of Pleasant and Painful Touch in the Human
Orbitofrontal and Cingulate Cortices. Cerebral Cortex, 13(3), 308-317.
Rolls, E. T., Bilderbeck, A., & McGlone, F. (2008). Cognitive influences on the affective
representation of touch and the sight of touch in the human brain. Social
Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(2), 97-108. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn005.
Starkmana, M., Giordanib, B., Gebarskic, S., Berentb, S., Schorke, M., & Schteingartd,
D. (1999). Decrease in cortisol reverses human hippocampal atrophy following

treatment of Cushing’s disease. Biological Psychiatry, 46(12), 1595-1602.
Vaillancourta, D. E., Yua, H., Maykab, M. A., & Corcosa, D. (2007). Role of the basal
ganglia and frontal cortex in selecting and producing internally guided force pulses.
Journal of Neuroimaging. 36(3). pp. 793-803.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.002.
Vermetten, E., Schmahl, C., Lindner, S., Loewenstein, R. J., Bremner, D. J. (2006).
Hippocampal and Amygdalar Volumes in Dissociative Identity Disorder. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 630-636.
Vermetten, E., Dorahy, M., Spiegel, D., (2007). Traumatic Dissociation: Neurobiology
and Treatment, American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 1618-1619. doi:
10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07081290.
Walach, H., Guthlin, C., & Konig, M. (2003). Efficacy of massage therapy in chronic
pain: a pragmatic randomized trial. Journal of Alternative and Complementary
Medicine. 9, 837-46.
Weaver, I. C. G., Grant, R., & Meaney, M. J. (2002). Maternal behavior regulates long-
term hippocampal expression of BAX and apoptosis in the offspring. Journal of
Neurochemestry. 82(4). pp. 998-1992.

The Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma Somatic Experiencing from Dysregulation to Coherence

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Semelhante a The Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma Somatic Experiencing from Dysregulation to Coherence

Semelhante a The Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma Somatic Experiencing from Dysregulation to Coherence (20)

Mais de Michael Changaris

Mais de Michael Changaris (20)

Último

Último (20)

The Neurobiology of Touch and Trauma Somatic Experiencing from Dysregulation to Coherence