3. Research objectives
• Identify facilities that could be
contributing to a waterbody
impairment via permit violation
—Analyze trends at these sites
➢ Pollutant types
➢ Annual pollutant loads
➢ Compliance history
• Note areas for future research
Charles River Pollution Control Facility (Google Earth)
4. Methods
1. Use DMR pollutant loading tool to
identify/filter facilities
2. Map sites alongside impaired
waterbodies
(MassDEP’s 2014 Integrated List of
Waters 305b/303d)
3. Assess facility-specific trends from
EPA’s Discharge Monitoring Report
(DMR) and Enforcement and
Compliance History Online (ECHO)
7. Charles River Wastewater Treatment Facility
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Poundsperyear(lb/yr)
Year
Phosphorus Load
Total pounds discharged Maximum allowable load
8. MA Correctional Institution (Norfolk/Walpole)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Poundsperyear(lb/yr)
Year
Aluminum Load
Total pounds discharged Maximum allowable load
9. New Bedford Wastewater Treatment Facility
* = Over limit at
some time during year
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
2012 2013* 2014* 2015* 2016*
Poundsperyear(lb/yr)
Year
Total suspended solids load
Total pounds discharged Maximum allowable load
10. Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2012 2013* 2014 2015 2016*
Poundsperyear(lb/yr)
Year
Phosphorus Load
Total pounds discharged Maximum allowable load
* = Over limit at
some time during year
11. Conclusion
and
Future Work
Major findings:
• Pollutant trends: some facilities consistently in
violation
• 26% of sites discharging to impaired waters have
expired permits
• Demonstrates a practical, visual method of
water quality analysis
Ø Moving forward: data clarification and
community engagement