SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 2
KTC Work Ethic Evaluation
Revised 9/20/2013 www.ktc.edu
Purpose: KTC Work Ethics program is designed to promote positive work behaviors and to
prepare students to be better, more productive workers.
The Work Ethic evaluation is based on the following set of work ethics traits:
Attendance/Appearance, Character, Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork and Productivity
Student: ______________________________ Instructor: ____________________________
Date: ______________________________ Program: ____________________________
Total _________ ÷ 4 = __________%
Evaluation Area Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
(90-100)
A
Superior
(80-89)
B
Average
(70-79)
C
Below
Average
(60-69)
D
Failing
(<60)
F
Attendance/
Punctuality/
Appearance
Advance notification ofabsences, arrives
andleaves on time; appropriate
dress/appearance for job
Comments:
Character Dependability, loyalty, honesty, integrity,
motivationand initiative
Comments:
Interpersonal
Skills/Teamwork
Attitude andrespect for others/property;
works well with others
Comments:
Productivity Equipment use andsafetyconsiderations;
produces output in a consistent manner;
keeps work area organized/clean. All
assignments completedin a timely manner.
Demonstrates problemsolvingskills
Comments:
Totals
WORK ETHIC EVALUATION
For Instructor Use Only
1st Semester 2nd Semester
____ SelfEval. ____ SelfEval.
____ 5th Week ____ 5th Week
____ 9th Week ____ 9th Week
____ 14th Week ____ 14th Week
____ 18th Week ____ 18th Week
KTC Work Ethic Evaluation
Revised 9/20/2013 www.ktc.edu
1. Work ethic grading/evaluation will be a permanent part of the student’s grade and will
appear on his/her transcript.
2. Students should strive to maintain an A average in the work ethic area. If the ethic average
falls below a C the student may be placed on probation and will be given a Student
Conference form (written plan of improvement).
Instructor Comments/Explanations
Student Comments
Plan of Improvement and Date of Review
Action(s) that may result in being terminated from a job: ___________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ _________________________________
Student’s Signature Date Instructor’s Signature Date

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque (10)

Pledge
PledgePledge
Pledge
 
Web 2.0
Web 2.0Web 2.0
Web 2.0
 
Dialnet la evoluciondelosprincipiosdeltrabajosocial-170273
Dialnet la evoluciondelosprincipiosdeltrabajosocial-170273Dialnet la evoluciondelosprincipiosdeltrabajosocial-170273
Dialnet la evoluciondelosprincipiosdeltrabajosocial-170273
 
Achievement - Continuos Performer in TATA POWER SOLAR
Achievement - Continuos Performer in TATA POWER SOLARAchievement - Continuos Performer in TATA POWER SOLAR
Achievement - Continuos Performer in TATA POWER SOLAR
 
08.09.2011 Business risks in mining & metals 2011/12, Uyanga Mandal
08.09.2011 Business risks in mining & metals 2011/12, Uyanga Mandal08.09.2011 Business risks in mining & metals 2011/12, Uyanga Mandal
08.09.2011 Business risks in mining & metals 2011/12, Uyanga Mandal
 
Globalizaã§ã£o1
Globalizaã§ã£o1Globalizaã§ã£o1
Globalizaã§ã£o1
 
Matematicas
MatematicasMatematicas
Matematicas
 
Aluizio azevedo
Aluizio azevedoAluizio azevedo
Aluizio azevedo
 
Magnitudes especiales
Magnitudes especialesMagnitudes especiales
Magnitudes especiales
 
Antinatalism vs natalism
Antinatalism vs natalism Antinatalism vs natalism
Antinatalism vs natalism
 

Semelhante a KTC Work Ethic Grading Form

Esraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photo
Esraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photoEsraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photo
Esraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photo
Esraa ShawkY
 
Scott_Resume CSU
Scott_Resume CSUScott_Resume CSU
Scott_Resume CSU
Scott Chase
 
New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1
New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1
New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1
Brian Nixon
 
Tirthankar_Basu_modified1_cv
Tirthankar_Basu_modified1_cvTirthankar_Basu_modified1_cv
Tirthankar_Basu_modified1_cv
Tirthankar Basu
 
Najla Janbi Resume updated 3
Najla Janbi Resume updated 3Najla Janbi Resume updated 3
Najla Janbi Resume updated 3
Najla Janbi
 
JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015
JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015
JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015
Jayaraj Prasanna
 

Semelhante a KTC Work Ethic Grading Form (20)

Brochure for Hirington
Brochure for HiringtonBrochure for Hirington
Brochure for Hirington
 
Episode 8
Episode 8Episode 8
Episode 8
 
Using Rubrics in the Classroom - Lynne Porter
Using Rubrics in the Classroom - Lynne PorterUsing Rubrics in the Classroom - Lynne Porter
Using Rubrics in the Classroom - Lynne Porter
 
Esraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photo
Esraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photoEsraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photo
Esraa ShawkY [HR] 2015 photo
 
Naresh_Saini
Naresh_SainiNaresh_Saini
Naresh_Saini
 
Jackie Smith CV 2014 - V3
Jackie Smith CV 2014 - V3Jackie Smith CV 2014 - V3
Jackie Smith CV 2014 - V3
 
Self-Assessment: Concept and Process
Self-Assessment: Concept and Process Self-Assessment: Concept and Process
Self-Assessment: Concept and Process
 
pm-pa.ppt
pm-pa.pptpm-pa.ppt
pm-pa.ppt
 
Reg form outcome based mgt edu
Reg form   outcome based mgt edu Reg form   outcome based mgt edu
Reg form outcome based mgt edu
 
Scott_Resume CSU
Scott_Resume CSUScott_Resume CSU
Scott_Resume CSU
 
CV-BanP_3
CV-BanP_3CV-BanP_3
CV-BanP_3
 
B.l. gupta (1)
B.l. gupta (1)B.l. gupta (1)
B.l. gupta (1)
 
New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1
New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1
New facultyie&evaluationjan2011 1
 
Tirthankar_Basu_modified1_cv
Tirthankar_Basu_modified1_cvTirthankar_Basu_modified1_cv
Tirthankar_Basu_modified1_cv
 
Tirthankar basu modified1_cv
Tirthankar basu modified1_cvTirthankar basu modified1_cv
Tirthankar basu modified1_cv
 
Najla Janbi Resume updated 3
Najla Janbi Resume updated 3Najla Janbi Resume updated 3
Najla Janbi Resume updated 3
 
Brandon Garner Resume
Brandon Garner ResumeBrandon Garner Resume
Brandon Garner Resume
 
C.V
C.VC.V
C.V
 
JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015
JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015
JAYARAJ PRASANNA_RESUME 14.02.2015
 
plan_01_-_november_2022.pdf
plan_01_-_november_2022.pdfplan_01_-_november_2022.pdf
plan_01_-_november_2022.pdf
 

KTC Work Ethic Grading Form

  • 1. KTC Work Ethic Evaluation Revised 9/20/2013 www.ktc.edu Purpose: KTC Work Ethics program is designed to promote positive work behaviors and to prepare students to be better, more productive workers. The Work Ethic evaluation is based on the following set of work ethics traits: Attendance/Appearance, Character, Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork and Productivity Student: ______________________________ Instructor: ____________________________ Date: ______________________________ Program: ____________________________ Total _________ ÷ 4 = __________% Evaluation Area Evaluation Criteria Excellent (90-100) A Superior (80-89) B Average (70-79) C Below Average (60-69) D Failing (<60) F Attendance/ Punctuality/ Appearance Advance notification ofabsences, arrives andleaves on time; appropriate dress/appearance for job Comments: Character Dependability, loyalty, honesty, integrity, motivationand initiative Comments: Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork Attitude andrespect for others/property; works well with others Comments: Productivity Equipment use andsafetyconsiderations; produces output in a consistent manner; keeps work area organized/clean. All assignments completedin a timely manner. Demonstrates problemsolvingskills Comments: Totals WORK ETHIC EVALUATION For Instructor Use Only 1st Semester 2nd Semester ____ SelfEval. ____ SelfEval. ____ 5th Week ____ 5th Week ____ 9th Week ____ 9th Week ____ 14th Week ____ 14th Week ____ 18th Week ____ 18th Week
  • 2. KTC Work Ethic Evaluation Revised 9/20/2013 www.ktc.edu 1. Work ethic grading/evaluation will be a permanent part of the student’s grade and will appear on his/her transcript. 2. Students should strive to maintain an A average in the work ethic area. If the ethic average falls below a C the student may be placed on probation and will be given a Student Conference form (written plan of improvement). Instructor Comments/Explanations Student Comments Plan of Improvement and Date of Review Action(s) that may result in being terminated from a job: ___________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ _________________________________ Student’s Signature Date Instructor’s Signature Date