What is a buy-in, and how do they work?
What is cash compensation?
The challenges of buy-ins and cash compensation
CSDR Level 1 and mandatory buy-ins
The Level 2 ESMA Consultation Paper: the 3 options for a buy-in mechanism
The challenges with the options
Conclusion (the need to amend the Level 1 text)
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Independent Call Girl Number in Kurla Mumbai📲 Pooja Nehwal 9892124323 💞 Full ...
The post trade challenges of implementing CSDR settlement discipline: Mandatory Buy-ins
1. The post trade challenges of implementing CSDR settlement discipline:
Mandatory Buy-ins
Post Trade Forum & Trade Show
Vienna, September 10th 2015
Andy Hill
2. Overview
What is a buy-in, and how do they work?
What is cash compensation?
The challenges of buy-ins and cash compensation
CSDR Level 1 and mandatory buy-ins
The Level 2 ESMA Consultation Paper: the 3 options for a buy-in mechanism
The challenges with the options
Conclusion (the need to amend the Level 1 text)
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
3. What is a buy-in and how do they work?1
A buy-in is a contractual remedy in the event of a settlement fail
It provides the purchasing (failed-to) counterparty with the right to obtain the securities
from a third party (via a buy-in agent)
The original transaction is then canceled and any differences in price (or costs) settled
between the original two counterparties
The objective is to restore both counterparties to the economic position they would have
been in, had the original transaction settled as intended
1See also: Buy-ins, how they work, and the challenge of CSDR
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
4. Examples of the buy-in process
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Figure 1: the original transaction
100 Bonds
98.50
Figure 2: a standard buy-in
100 bonds 100 bonds
0.75 99.25 99.25
A
BA Z
B
Market
5. Examples of the buy-in process
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Figure 3: a standard buy-in where the buy-in price is below the original transaction price
100 bonds 100 bonds
0.50 98.00 98.00
A B Z Market
Figure 1: the original transaction
100 Bonds
98.50
A B
6. Examples of the buy-in process (‘pass-ons’)
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Figure 5: settling the buy-in chain
Pass-on 100 bonds 100 bonds
0.75 0.50 99.25 99.25
A B C Z Mar-
ket
Figure 4: original inter-connected transactions
100 bonds 100 bonds
98.50 98.75
A B C
7. The cost of being bought-in: the buy-in premium
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Figure 1: the original transaction
100 Bonds
98.50
A B
Figure 6: the cost to the failing counterparty due to the buy-in premium
100 bonds 100 bonds 100 bonds
99.00 0.75 99.25 99.25
A MarketB ZMarket
8. Cash compensation
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Figure 1: the original transaction
100 Bonds
98.50
A B
Figure 7: cash compensation where the reference price is higher than the original transaction price
0.75 99.25
Figure 8: cash compensation where the reference price is lower than the original transaction price
0.50 98.00
BA Market
Price
BA Market
Price
9. The challenges of buy-ins and cash compensation
The buy-in process can be time consuming for all counterparties concerned
Finding buy-in agents can be difficult, particularly as there is little incentive and no
obligation
Buy-ins can has a distortive impact on market pricing, mainly due to required premium
and signaling of ‘distressed buyer’
Where the buy-in price is significantly higher than market, this can lead to disputes
Buy-ins are not always executable, particularly where securities are illiquid
Buy-ins may not be enforceable in some jurisdictions
Setting the cash compensation price can be contentious
Cash compensation can disadvantage the failed-to purchaser
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
10. CSDR Level 1 (Article 7) and mandatory buy-ins
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
A buy-in process must be initiated after 4 days of failing from intended settlement date (7
days for less liquid securities, and 15 days for SME instruments)
What a buy-in is, or its purpose, is not defined
Buy-ins are executed at the CSD participant level (which in most cases will not be the
same as the trading counterparties)
If the buy-in is unsuccessful (with the opportunity for deferral), cash compensation shall
be applied
Where the buy-in price is lower than the original transaction price, the difference is paid
to the receiving participant by the failing participant (i.e. the ‘wrong-way round’).
The start legs of securities financing transactions are brought into scope (except for very
short-dated SFTs)
11. The challenges of CSDR mandatory buy-ins
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
How to replace a contractual right of trading counterparties with a mandatory obligation
of ‘participants’ who are not party to the original transaction?
How to ensure enforceability against counterparties outside of the EU (and preserve a
level playing field)?
How to manage and mitigate risks to both the trading counterparties and the CSD
participants?
How to ensure that the provision to pay the cash difference in the wrong direction (a free
‘put’ for the purchaser) does not lead to market manipulation?
How to manage thousands of buy-ins being initiated every day?
How to preserve market liquidity and stability2?
2 See: CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins Impact Study
12. ESMA Consultation Paper on the Operation of the Buy-in Process (Level 2)
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
In August 2015, stakeholders were asked to respond on three options for a buy-in process
put forward by ESMA:
(i) Trading level execution
(ii) Trading level with fall-back execution
(iii) CSD participant level execution
13. CSDR Level 2 buy-in options
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Original transaction
Trading
Venue
Level
Trading
Counterparty
Level
100 bonds
98.50
CSD
Participant
Level
CSD
Level
A B
Trading
Venue
Partici-
pant X
Partici-
pant Y
CSD
14. CSDR Option 1: trading level execution
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Trading level buy-in
Trading
Venue
Level
Trading
Counterparty
Level
100 bonds 100 bonds
? Buy-in Px Buy-in Px
CSD
Participant
Level
CSD
Level
A B
Trading
Venue
Partici-
pant X
Partici-
pant Y
CSD
Z Mark-
et
15. CSDR Option 1: trading level execution
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Trading level buy-in: cash compensation
Trading
Venue
Level
Trading
Counterparty
Level
? Reference Px
CSD
Participant
Level
CSD
Level
A B
Trading
Venue
Partici-
pant X
Partici-
pant Y
CSD
Mark-
et
16. CSDR Option 1: trading level execution
Similar to how buy-ins are executed today
Minimizes risks for both trading counterparties
Does not involve participants who are not party to the original transaction
Disadvantages
Mandatory cash compensation still creates risk for purchasing (failed to) counterparty
May be difficult to enforce
May be illegal under CSDR Level 1
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Advantages
17. CSDR Option 2: trading level with fall-back execution
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Trading level with fall-back option: buy-in
Trading
Venue
Level
Trading
Counterparty
Level
100 bonds 100 bonds
? Buy-in Px Buy-in Px
CSD
Participant
Level
CSD
Level
A B
Trading
Venue
Partici-
pant X
Partici-
pant Y
CSD
Z Mark-
et
18. CSDR Option 2: trading level with fall-back execution
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Trading level with fall-back option: cash compensation
Trading
Venue
Level
Trading
Counterparty
Level
CSD
Participant
Level
? Reference Px
CSD
Level
A B
Trading
Venue
Partici-
pant X
Partici-
pant Y
CSD
Mark-
et
19. CSDR Option 2: trading level with fall-back execution
Buy-in process at the trading level (same as today)
Cash compensation ‘fall-back’ ensures enforceability (albeit at participant level)
Disadvantages
Fall-back option of cash compensation at participant level creates additional risk for
purchasing (failed to) counterparty
Fall-back option of cash compensation at participant level creates additional risk for
selling (failing) counterparty
Fall-back option of cash compensation creates risk for the delivering participant (and a
potential need for collateralization of deliveries)
May also be illegal under CSDR Level 1
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Advantages
20. CSDR Option 3: CSD participant execution
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
CSD participant level buy-in
Trading
Venue
Level
Trading
Counterparty
Level
CSD
Participant
Level
100 bonds 100 bonds
? Buy-in Px Buy-in Px
CSD
Level
A B
Trading
Venue
Partici-
pant X
Partici-
pant Y
CSD
Z Mark-
et
22. CSDR Option 3: CSD participant level execution
Consistent with the Level 1
Disadvantages
Creates additional risk for the purchasing (failed to) counterparty
Creates additional risk for the selling (failing) counterparty
Creates risk for the delivering participant (and a potential need for collateralization of
deliveries)
Creates risk for the receiving participant (and a potential need for collateralization or pre-
payment of receipts)
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Advantages
23. Market risk profile of the three options
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Option1
Option2
Option3
Purchasing counterparty
Selling counterparty
Receiving participant
Delivering participant
No additional risk
Some additional risk
Significant additional risk
24. Timeline
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
End of September 2015: ESMA was due to submit finalized draft RTS to the EC3
Trialogues between the Commission, Parliament and Council to finalize the RTS in Q4 of
2015
Level 2 to be passed into law by end of 2015, and effective early 2016
An 18-24 month delay in implementing settlement discipline measures expected
3 The draft RTS specific to mandatory buy-ins are now expected to be delayed until November 2015
25. Conclusion
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins
Buy-ins are a contractual remedy available to trading level counterparties in the event of
a settlement fail. They are usually a right, and are not intended to penalize the failing
counterparty.
CSDR makes buy-ins a mandatory obligation, rather than a contractual right
CSDR places the buy-in process at the CSD participant level, and not necessarily at the
trading counterparty level
CSDR fails to define what a buy-in is, or its purpose, and seems to turn it into a penalty
mechanism, rather than a contractual remedy
There is growing pressure from the market for the Level 1 text to be reviewed
27. About the author/presenter
Andy Hill is a Director in ICMA’s Market Practice and Regulatory Policy group. For
seventeen years he has been a repo and money-market trader, and for ten years he was
an Executive Director at Goldman Sachs. He has also worked as a consultant in the Aid
and Development sector, primarily based in Cambodia, and previously served on the
Board of the Cambodian NGO Education Partnership in Phnom Penh while under a
Goldman Sachs Public Service Fellowship. He holds a BSc (Hons) in Business Studies from
Cass Business School and an MSc in Poverty Reduction and Development Management
from the University of Birmingham.
Email: andy.hill@icmagroup.org
CSDR Mandatory Buy-ins