SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 2
Baixar para ler offline
Group Work Peer Evaluation

Use this form to evaluate each member of your group. These evaluations will be confidential, and will
not be disclosed to your colleagues. They will be used as a multiplier against the group grade for
assigning individual grades. When used as the multiplier in combination with the assignment rubric, a
rating of 10 is considered 100%, 1 is considered 10%. Thus, an average score here of 9 would mean that
the points awarded on the assignment would be multiplied by 90% or .9 to determine the final
assignment grade. If the group’s grade on an assignment was 10 points but for whatever reason an
individual only received an average peer evaluation score of 5 for the group work, that individual would
receive an assignment grade of 5/10 points (10 x 50% = 5)

I expect everyone to make a good faith contribution to his or her group and participate in a mutually
agreeable way. If you feel unable to give a colleague a score of 10, Active participation, please add a
comment to help me understand the situation.

Failure to turn in evaluations of your colleagues will cause your assignment grade to be lowered by 3
points [If your group earned 10 points on the assignment, but you didn’t turn in the peer evaluations,
your maximum grade for the assignment will be 7 points (10-3 = 7)].

Your Name:

Assignment:

Evaluation of:
Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process
No participation at all                                                              Active participation
   1         2          3        4          5          6         7        8               9         10
Comments:


Evaluation of:
Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process
No participation at all                                                              Active participation
   1         2          3        4          5          6         7        8               9         10
Comments:


Evaluation of:
Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process
No participation at all                                                              Active participation
   1         2          3        4          5          6         7        8               9         10
Comments:


Evaluation of:
Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process
No participation at all                                                              Active participation


                       Minneapolis Community & Technical College Library
1       2            3         4         5         6         7         8         9        10
Comments:


Evaluation of:
Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process
No participation at all                                                       Active participation
   1         2          3        4          5          6         7        8        9         10
Comments:


Evaluation of:
Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process
No participation at all                                                       Active participation
   1         2          3        4          5          6         7        8        9         10
Comments:




                     Minneapolis Community & Technical College Library

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Linda Russell (9)

Improving Reading for Developmental Mathematics Handouts
Improving Reading for Developmental Mathematics HandoutsImproving Reading for Developmental Mathematics Handouts
Improving Reading for Developmental Mathematics Handouts
 
Amatyc improving reading for developmental mathematics2014
Amatyc improving  reading for developmental mathematics2014Amatyc improving  reading for developmental mathematics2014
Amatyc improving reading for developmental mathematics2014
 
Mother Rubric
Mother RubricMother Rubric
Mother Rubric
 
Resources Online
Resources OnlineResources Online
Resources Online
 
Rubric For Math Quizzes Dillon
Rubric For Math Quizzes DillonRubric For Math Quizzes Dillon
Rubric For Math Quizzes Dillon
 
Clinical Explanation Rubric
Clinical Explanation RubricClinical Explanation Rubric
Clinical Explanation Rubric
 
2225 L Clinical Explanation
2225 L Clinical Explanation2225 L Clinical Explanation
2225 L Clinical Explanation
 
Jennifer Mrubric Business
Jennifer Mrubric BusinessJennifer Mrubric Business
Jennifer Mrubric Business
 
Life Just Got A Little Easier
Life Just Got A Little EasierLife Just Got A Little Easier
Life Just Got A Little Easier
 

Jenny Group

  • 1. Group Work Peer Evaluation Use this form to evaluate each member of your group. These evaluations will be confidential, and will not be disclosed to your colleagues. They will be used as a multiplier against the group grade for assigning individual grades. When used as the multiplier in combination with the assignment rubric, a rating of 10 is considered 100%, 1 is considered 10%. Thus, an average score here of 9 would mean that the points awarded on the assignment would be multiplied by 90% or .9 to determine the final assignment grade. If the group’s grade on an assignment was 10 points but for whatever reason an individual only received an average peer evaluation score of 5 for the group work, that individual would receive an assignment grade of 5/10 points (10 x 50% = 5) I expect everyone to make a good faith contribution to his or her group and participate in a mutually agreeable way. If you feel unable to give a colleague a score of 10, Active participation, please add a comment to help me understand the situation. Failure to turn in evaluations of your colleagues will cause your assignment grade to be lowered by 3 points [If your group earned 10 points on the assignment, but you didn’t turn in the peer evaluations, your maximum grade for the assignment will be 7 points (10-3 = 7)]. Your Name: Assignment: Evaluation of: Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process No participation at all Active participation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Comments: Evaluation of: Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process No participation at all Active participation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Comments: Evaluation of: Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process No participation at all Active participation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Comments: Evaluation of: Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process No participation at all Active participation Minneapolis Community & Technical College Library
  • 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Comments: Evaluation of: Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process No participation at all Active participation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Comments: Evaluation of: Rate your colleague’s overall level of participation in the group process No participation at all Active participation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Comments: Minneapolis Community & Technical College Library