3. Diabetes – Growing Threat in Myanmar
Diabetes has been noted to be increasingly
common in Myanmar!
4.
5. Patients achieving targets (%)
Uncontrolled Hyperglycemia is a Global
Problem In Clinical Practice
HbA1c <7%
56
HbA1c <7%
51
USA (NHANES) CANADA (DICE)
HbA1c <6.5%
31
EUROPE
(CODE-2)
HbA1c <6.5%
36
Emerging
countries
(IDPMS)
6. Progressive nature of Type 2 diabetes
Normal
Impaired
glucose
tolerance
Late type 2
diabetes
complications
Type 2
diabetes
Insulin
sensitive
Hyperglycaemia
Normal insulin
secretion
Insulin
resistance
Normoglycaemia
β-cell
exhaustion
Insulin resistance
Fasting plasma glucose
Insulin sensitivity
Insulin secretion
Adapted from Bailey CJ et al. Int J Clin Pract 2004;58:867–876.
Groop LC. Diabetes Obes Metab 1999;1 (Suppl. 1):S1–S7.
Glaritus
2012
6
7. ADA/ACE Targets for Glycemic control1
FPG
PPG
HBA1c
90-130 mg/dL
<180 mg/dL
<7.0%
<110 mg/dL
<140 mg/dL
<6.5%
For certain patients, a more stringent goal of <6.0% can be considered. 2
1.
2.
ADA, Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1): S33S50/AACE, Endocrine Practice 2002;8(Suppl 1):5-11
ADA, Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1): S15-S35
Glaritus
2012
7
8. Contributions of FPG and PPG On
Glycosylated Haemoglobin
Increasing Contribution of FPG as A1C Increases
100%
30%
%
Contribution
80%
60%
70%
60%
55%
50%
FPG
PPG
40%
20%
70%
30%
40%
45%
50%
0%
< 10.2
10.2 to 9.3 9.2 to 8.5 8.4 to 7.3
A1C Range (%)
Adapted from Monnier L, Lapinski H, Collette C. Contributions of fasting and
postprandial plasnma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyper glycemia
of Type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HBA(1c).
Diabetes Care. 2003;26:881-885.
< 7.3
9. Evidence of good glycemic control
• Several landmark trials viz;
– United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS)
– Diabetes Control and Complications trial (DCCT)
– Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of
Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC)
– ADVANCE study
– All reinstate the importance of good glycemic control in
reducing the risk of microvascular & macrovascular
complications of diabetes
– Decrease of 1% in HBA1c levels is associated with a 21%
reduction in risk for any diabetes related end points
Glaritus
2012
9
10. ß-Cell Function (% ß)
The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study demonstrated that a
great majority of patients with Type 2 diabetes will eventually require
Insulin and have provided level IA evidence that intensive glycemic
control improves patient outcomes*
Early Type 2
Late Type 2/
Type 1
Glaritus
2012
10
12. Indications of Insulin
• Absolute
– Type 1 diabetic patients
– GDM (Gestational Diabetes Mellitus)
– Ketoacidosis
• Relative
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Type 2 diabetic patient with primary or secondary failure to OHA
Surgery under general anesthesia
Type 2 diabetes with symptoms of glucose toxicity
Acute illness
Acute infections, e.g., Pneumonia, septicemia, etc.
Active pulmonary tuberculosis
Acute MI, CVA
Diabetic nephropathy
Chronic liver disease, etc.
Glaritus
2012
12
13. • Traditionally insulin is introduced to patients with only after
combination of two or three OHA failed to provide adequate
glycemic control
• General trend of insulin usage is last resort for Type 2
Diabetes
• Superior efficacy of insulin over oral agents in reducing
HbA1C levels is augmented by beneficial profile of new
insulin analogs versus human insulin
•
Difference of current treatment guideline is they all
recommend to initiate insulin therapy earlier than usual in
patients not achieving HbA1C targets
Glaritus
2012
13
15. Traditionally, insulin is used only when OADs fail to
control glucose
Lifestyle changes
E.g. diet and exercise
Adequate in only ~15% of people
Oral antidiabetic agents
E.g. metformin, sulphonylurea
(or glitazone)
Poor glycaemic control
Oral combination therapy
E.g. metformin plus
sulphonylurea, metformin plus
glitazone
Poor glycaemic control
INSULIN
With/without oral
agent*
*Glitazones are contraindicated in combination with insulin
Bergenstal RM et al. In: Degroot et al. (eds) Endocrinology 2001: pp. 821–35
17. Beta cell function loss is earlier and greater than
expected
By the time that the diagnosis of
diabetes is made, the patient has lost
over 80% of his/her β-cell function
DeFronzo RA. Diabetes. 2009 58:773–95.
18. Need of insulin increases over time
Patients
requiring
additional
insulin
(%)
60
40
20
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Years from randomization
Chlorpropamide
Glipizide
~53% of patients required additional insulin therapy by year 6
Wright A , Burden A.C, Paisey R.B, Cull C. Holman R.R. Ukpds. Sulfonylurea Inadequacy Diabetes Care. 2002;25:330-6.
21. Time to insulin initiation and incidence of
complications are increasing
Median duration until insulin
initiation (years)
Patients with at least 1 macrovascular
event before initiation (%)
Kotav K, et al, Diabetologia 2011; 54 Suppl.1)374
22. “Ideal” & “Real Course” of
“Treated” Type-2-Diabetes
9,5
9,0
HbA1c (%)
(First) cardiovascular event
e.g. Myocardial Infarction
New therapy attempt
There is golden window period
in diabetes; in first 3 - years
Real course
Build-up of
metabolic memory
Ideal course
8,5
Increasing the
risk of diabetic
late
complications
8,0
7,5
7,0
6,5
6,0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10
Time (years after diagnosis)
11
12
13
22
14
15
16
Del Prato, Diabetologia (2009) 52(7),1219- 1226
24. Insulin Usage
Number of diabetics using medication:
25-30 million
Oral products
66%
Oral/insulin
Insulin
7%
27%
Patients treated with Insulin were 1.68 times more likely to acheive 2
consecutive HbA1c levels of 6.5% or less, sooner than those on OADs*
* Gerstein et al, Diabet Met. 2006;23:736-742
Glaritus
2012
24
25. Types of Insulin
*Leahy JL, Intensive Insulin Therapy in Type 1 diabetes
mellitus, in Lehay JL: Insulin Therapy. New
York, NY, Marcel Dekker, Inc.2002, p 87-112
Glaritus
2012
25
26. Normal Insulin Secretion:
The Basal-Bolus Insulin Concept
Endogenous Insulin
Bolus Insulin
Insulin Effect
Basal Insulin
B
L
D
HS
Time of Administration
B, breakfast; L, lunch; D, dinner; HS, bedtime.
Adapted from:
1. Leahy JL. In: Leahy JL, Cefalu WT, eds. Insulin Therapy. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2002.
2. Bolli GB et al. Diabetologia. 1999;42:1151-1167.
Glaritus
2012
26
27. Insulin regimen:
Once-daily regimen
• Long- or intermediate-acting insulin is given at bedtime.
• It is suitable only for patients with type 2 diabetes and may be
used in combination with oral hypoglycaemic agents.
• This regimen may be used when starting insulin in type 2 diabetes
NICE Clinical Guideline (July 2004), NICE Clinical
Guideline (May 2009)
Glaritus
2012
27
28. Insulin regimen…
Twice-daily regimen
• A biphasic insulin is injected twice a day (pre-breakfast and preevening meal).
• The peak action varies directly with the proportion of soluble
insulin in the combination.
• The peak and trough of the evening dose of longer-acting insulin
can lead to the combination of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and then
fasting hyperglycaemia in the morning.
Glaritus
2012
28
29. Insulin regimen…
Three times per day
• In uncontrolled FPG
• 2/3 in BF, of which 2/3 NPH, 1/3 Regular
• 1/6 before EM, Regular
• 1/6 HS, NPH
Four times per day
• Either NPH & Regular (¼ X 3 R and ¼ HS NPH)
• Ultrashort and Long analogues (1/6 X 3 Aspart / Lispro and
½ HS Glargine)
Glaritus
2012
29
30. Insulin regimen….
Basal bolus regimen
•
Regular and Intermediate/long acting insulin is used.
•
Basal requirement is met by intermediate acting insulin
given twice a day before breakfast and dinner.
•
The regular insulin is given before each meal thrice a day.
Out of the total daily requirement 50% is given as basal
(intermediate/long) and 50% as regular insulin.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
•
Only short acting insulin by insulin pump.
•
It is neither practical, nor are the results better than twice
daily or bolus regimen.
Glaritus
2012
30
30
31. When to start the regimens?
A. Once daily regimen
• In type 2 diabetes patients with secondary failure to OHA: used in
combination with OHA.
B. Twice daily regimen
•
In type l, 2, and GDM patients.
•
When HbA1c is >9%
C. Basal Bolus regimen
•
When adequate control is not achieved by premixed insulin alone
D. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
• When the patient is very much compliant
Glaritus
2012
31
32. Current Diabetes Therapy Falls Short
Inadequate control of Fasting Blood Glucose
Glaritus
2012
32
33. Key of insulin therapy
• Control of both FPG and PPBS is essential to improve
microvascular and macrovascular outcomes
• Ideal goal of insulin therapy is to mimic the pattern of
physiologic insulin secretion to control FPG & PPBG
• In order to achieve the normal physiological profile, Long
acting basal insulin suppress endogenous hepatic glucose
output therefore reducing FBG and short acting insulin to
address PPG
• Newer insulin analogs mimic the profile of endogenous
insulin more closely than recombinant human insulin
Glaritus
2012
33
34. Shortfalls of Current Regimen
• Unpredictable in insulin absorption
• Mismatch between glycemic excursions and insulin levels
• Lack of a truly basal insulin
• Poor FBG / PPBG control
• Events of Hypoglycemia
Glaritus
2012
34
35. Fasting Plasma Glucose
• Predicts the degree of post-meal hyperglycemia and the
magnitude of the post-meal excursion from baseline*
• FPG is a determinant of PPG excursion
*Diab Care 25: 1247-1248,2002
Glaritus
2012
35
36. FPG & Complications…
• FPG shows a positive association with the incidence of
diabetes related morbidity and mortality
• A study showed*
FPG
Risk of mortality
<110 mg/dl
No increased risk
110 – 125 mg/dl
40% increased risk
125 – 140 mg/dl
Double the risk
*Diab Care 2005;28(11):2626-32
Glaritus
2012
36
39. Physiology of basal Insulin
• Suppresses lipolysis
• Restrains hepatic glucose output
• Prevents hypo-neuroglycopenia (in concert with glucagon)
• Not relevant to glucose utilization by muscle
An adipose-hepato-centric hormone
Large metabolic effects for small
changes in plasma
concentration
40. Basal Insulin Supplements
Basal Insulin
Preparations
Onset
(hours)
Peak
(hours)
Duration
(hours)
Remarks
NPH
2–4
6 – 10
10 – 16
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Glargine
1–2
Peakless
24
• No Unpredictable peaks
• No Unpredictable glucose fluctuations
• Decreased hypoglycemia
Detemir
3–4
Peakless
Upto 14
hrs
• Injection site reactions and allergic
reactions
• Higher insulin dosage required
Glaritus
2012
Does not mimic basal insulin release profile
Component of Premixed
Does not provide enough flexibility
Unexpected time–action profiles
Unpredictable peaks
Unpredictable glucose fluctuations
Increased hypoglycemia
40
41. Ideal basal insulin
• The ideal basal insulin should have…
– Mimic the physiological Insulin secretion pattern
– Square-wave action profile, i.e., no peak, long-lasting
– Reproducible effects
– Pharmacodynamic effects similar to pump insulin
This need is fulfilled by:
INSULIN GLARGINE
Glaritus
2012
41
42. Insulin Glargine: Structure
Phe Gly Arg
Tyr Phe
Glu
Thr
Gly
Pro
Arg Arg
Extension
Lys
A21 Gly Cys
Thr
A1 Gly
lle
Asp
Glu
Gln
Cys
B30
Asp
Gly
Substitution
Tyr
Gln
Glu
Leu
Gln
Tyr
Cys Thr Ser
lle Cys Ser
Leu
Cys
B1 Phe Val Asn Gln His Leu
Insulin Glargine:
21A-Gly-30Ba-L-Arg-30Bb-L-Arg-insulin
pH = 4; Clear solution; Do not mix
Cys
Val
Leu
Tyr
Leu
Ala
Glu
Val
Leu
His
Ser
Gly
43. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER GLARGINE
INJECTION ?
Glargine
Clear
Solution
pH 4.0
pH
7.4
Precipitation
Dissolution
Hexamers
10-3 M
Dimers
10-5M
Monomers
10-8 M
S.c. Injection of
an acidic solution (pH
4.0)
Precipitation of glargine in
subcutaneous tissue (pH
7.4)
Slow dissolution of free
glargine hexamers from
precipitated Glargine
Capillary Membrane
Insulin in Blood
Protracted action
44. Are all insulin
analogs equally
effective?
-Pharmacokinetics
and
pharmacodynamics
of insulin glargine
and insulin detemir
in patients with type
35 IU insulin; PG-Clamp
1 mg/dL X 24h
100 diabetes.
Duration of action :
(PG < 150 mg/dL)
Insulin glargine: >24h
Insulin detemir: 17.5 h
Porcellati et al, DIABETES CARE , 30,OCTOBER 2007
45. Factors affecting PK / PD profile of insulin analog
• Insulin dose :
• area under the curve (AUC) and DOA for long & rapid acting
analog increases with dose elevation
• Injecting site
• Deeper subcutaneous injections cause more rapid insulin
diffusion and absorption
• High Sc fat slow absorption, altering or delaying the time
action profile
• Glargine has no clinically significant differences in DOA
whether injected in abdomen, thigh or deltoid where as in
Determer , bioavailabilty differs, 64%in abdomen, 59%in
thigh and 65% in deltoid
Glaritus
2012
45
46. Changes of PK /PD in special patient population
Elderly patients
Obesity – high subcutaneous fat slow the absorption
Renal dysfunction – 30 to 80% of insulin is removed by renal
excretion
Hepatic dysfunction – liver mainly controls hepatic glucose
output and uptake
Pregnancy – PK not altered but insulin resistance increased so
needing higher dose of insulin
Exercise –conditions causing greater blood flow
( exercise, massage, hot bath ) is associated with rapid insulin
absorption
Glaritus
2012
46
47. How has insulin Glargine changed the
treatment paradigm of diabetes?
• Once daily administration
• Easy titration algorithm
• Sustained glycemic control
• Less hypoglycemia
• Easy to use for specialist, GP, and patient
48. Mean HbA1c (%)
Insulin glargine: rapid and sustained glycemic
control.
A 32 month extension of a 9 month, open
label, uncontrolled, multicenter, observational study
(n=12216)
-----------
Months of treatment
Insulin glargine + OADs provides sustained glycemic control
Schreiber SA et al, Diabetes Techno Ther 2008; 10 121-7
49. Effect of insulin glargine on β-cell function
Insulin Secretion (mU/kg per min)
Insulin Secretion (mU/kg per
min)
First phase (t=0 to 10 min minus basal levels) and second phase insulin
secretion (t=-10 to 120 min minus basal levels) in response to IV glucose
administration in T2DM(n=14) before and after 8 weeks of insulin glargine
treatment
Pennartz C, et al, Diabetes Care 2011; 34-204
50. Insulin glargine has demonstrated effective
HbA1c reductions across a wide range of
RCTs in T1DM
Raskin
(2000)
n=619,
16 weeks
Bolli
(2009)
n=175, 2
4 weeks
Fulcher
(2005)
n=125, 3
0 weeks
Ashwell
(2006)
n=56, 3
2 weeks
Chatterje
e (2007)
n=53, 3
6 weeks
Porcellati
(2004)
n=121, 5
2 weeks
HbA1c reduction with insulin glargine in RCTs of varying duration and size
51. Lower risk of hypoglycemia for insulin glargine vs
NPH at any level of HbA1c in T1DM
Rate of hypoglycemia (events
per patients-year)
Meta-analysis of 5 randomized trails comparing insulin glargine and NPH
in HbA1c in T1DM
P=0004
HbA1c (%; LOCF)
Mullins P, et al, Clin ther 2007; 29; 1607-19
52. APOLLO: Insulin glargine vs prandial insulin lispro
44 week open label study on 412 T2DM patients treated with OHAs and
Glargine (OD) or Lispro (TID)
Change in HbA1c
30
Glargine
Lispro
-1.65
-1.7
-1.71
-1.75
-1.8
-1.85
Difference=.157
95% Cl -.008 to
0.332
-1.87
Hypoglycemic events
Change in HbA1c (%)
-1.6
24
25
Glargine
Lispro
20
13.6
15
10
5.2
5
4.2
0.520.34
0.030.08
0
-1.9
Overall
Symptomatic Nocturnal
Severe
Significant better treatment satisfaction with glargine compare to lispro
Bratzel RG et al Lancet 2008; 371:1073-8
53. THE
LANCET
• The first clinically available
long acting analog
*addition of insulin glargine to therapies
with oral hypoglycemic agents can be
regarded as a first-line insulin initiation
approach in type 2 diabetes mellitus*
• 42 million patient-years of
experience
• 80,000 individuals in clinical
development programs
worldwide
• Available in over 100
countries
54. Setting standards for basal insulin therapy : The
contribution of insulin glargine
Peak less, 24 hours insulin coverage
Effective, sustained glycemic control with the low
incidence of hypoglycemia in clinical trail and in real life
clinical practice.
Favorable impact on quality of life
Benefits proven across a wide range of patients
populations in T1DM & T2DM.
Easy to use, flexible titration algorithms
12 years of clinical experience.
Wealth of evidence to support a basal insulin treatment
regimen with insulin glargine.
Notas do Editor
Relative contributions of postprandial and fasting hyperglycemia to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia accordingto quintiles of glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C). *Significant difference was observed between postprandialplasma glucose (PPG) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (paired t test); †significantly different from all other quintiles(analysis of variance); ‡significantly different from quintile 5 (analysis of variance). From Diabetes Care, Vol. 26, 2003:881–885.16 Reprinted with permission fromThe American Diabetes Association
Previous calculations indicated that upto 50% of beta cells may be lost at the time of diagnosis of diabetes. When improved methods of beta cell function estimation are used it appears that upto 80% of beta cell function may be lost at diagnosis necessitating early aggressive therapy to prevent its progression.
According to the UKPDS studies it is shown that more than 50% of the patients on OAD require insulin by year 6. this requirement of insulin increases with time. If patients receive insulin early, their beta cells can be preserved to some extent.
Ultimately, more intensive insulin regimens may be required (see Figure 3.)Dashed arrow line on the left-hand side of the figure denotes the option of a more rapid progression from a 2-drug combination directly to multiple daily insulin doses, in those patients with severe hyperglycaemia (e.g. HbA1c ≥10.0-12.0%). Consider beginning with insulin if patient presents with severe hyperglycemia (≥300-350 mg/dl [≥16.7-19.4 mmol/l]; HbA1c ≥10.0-12.0%) with or without catabolic features (weight loss, ketosis, etc).
Ultimately, more intensive insulin regimens may be required (see Figure 3.)Dashed arrow line on the left-hand side of the figure denotes the option of a more rapid progression from a 2-drug combination directly to multiple daily insulin doses, in those patients with severe hyperglycaemia (e.g. HbA1c ≥10.0-12.0%). Consider beginning with insulin if patient presents with severe hyperglycemia (≥300-350 mg/dl [≥16.7-19.4 mmol/l]; HbA1c ≥10.0-12.0%) with or without catabolic features (weight loss, ketosis, etc).
So what are the insulin preparation available and what regimen are followed …
C. Basal bolus regimenIn this regimen regular and intermediate acting insulin is used. Basal requirement is met by intermediate acting insulin given twice a day before breakfast and dinner. The regular insulin is given before each meal thrice a day. Out of the total daily requirement 50% is given as basal (intermediate) and 50% as regular insulin. The share of regular insulin (50%) is given as 20% BBF, 10% BL and 20% BD. It gives similar results as compared to twice a day but the only disadvantage is that the before lunch (BL) dose is to be taken at school or office.D. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion Only short acting insulin is used and is given by insulin pump which the patient has to wear throughout the day. It is neither practical, nor are the results better than twice daily or bolus regimen.All this regimen are available to guide te treatment but still lot of practical aspects need to be consideredSo what are the aspect where we need to stress and improve in future
Our current health care system approach to diabetes is not working. Infrequent medical visits, lack of recorded data, and the lack of helpful advice about insulin doses as diet and lifestyle decisions that affect control are made each day, all contribute to the poor A1c results.