SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 38
THE PANTHEON
ROME, ITALY
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 2, PROJECT 2
BY: CHAN PIN QI, LEE JO EE, MAHI ABDUL MUHSIN, TAN SHING YOEU, TAN ZI JIAN, DANAR JOVIAN
CONTENT
HISTORY OF BUILDING 2
INTRODUCTION 3
ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS 4
MATERIALS
CONSTRUCTION METHODS/DETAILS
FORCES & LOAD DISTRIBUTION
EXPERIMENTATION & PROCESS OF MODEL
GROUP MEMBERS:
CHAN PIN QI ( 0314676 )
LEE JO YEE ( 0314880 )
MAHI ABDUL MUHSIN ( 0314421 )
DANAR JOVIAN (0314575 )
TAN SHING YOEU ( 0314850 )
TAN ZI JIAN ( 0318291 )
INTRODUCTION
The Pantheon is the best preserved building from ancient Rome and was completed in c.125 CE in the reign
of Hadrian. Its magnificent dome is a lasting testimony to the genuis of Roman architects and as the building
stands virtually intact, it offers a unique opportunity for the modern visitors to step back 2000 years and
experience the glory that was Rome.
Until, the 20th century, the Pantheon was the largest concrete structure in the world. The Pantheon was
dedicated to pan theos, "all the gods." When it became a church, it was dedicated to the Virgin Mary and
all the martyrs.
The Pantheon was originally built in 27-25 BC by the magistrate Marcus Agrippa (his name appears on the
inscription outside), to commemorate the victory of Actium over Antony and Cleopatra. This original temple
burned down in 80 AD. The second temple was dedicated to every known god, from which the Pantheon
gets its name. Hadrian himself is credited with the basic plan, an architectural design that was unique for the
time.
.
HISTORY 1
THE EXTERIOR & INTERIOR
AN OVERVIEW OF THE EXTERIOR
The building consists of two principal parts - the porch,
which is very classical Greek and the circular main
building which is more roman in style. The circular
building is built with brick and concrete but was
originally faced with white marble stucco to match the
porch in appearance. The dome is concrete with the
external surface originally covered in bronze. the whole
building stands on a 1.3 m high base which originally
extended a further 7 metres in front of the colonnade,
steps in numidian yellow marble extended from the
outer ends of this base.
INTERIOR
The Pantheon may well be the first building from
Classical architecture where the interior is deliberately
made to outshine the exterior. The circular part of the
building or rotunda was entranced via two bronze doors
measuring 12 x 7.5. The rotunda measures 43.2 m in
diameter which is exactly the maximum height of the
dome, itself a perfect hemisphere. At the very top of the
dome is an opening to the sky (oculus) which is 8.8 m in
diameter and has a decorative bronze sheet frieze. The
dome is made from a light tufa and scoria (a type of
pumice) mix of concrete (caementa) and its interior is
further lightened by five rings of 28 coffers which reduce
in size as they rise towards the centre of the dome.
These may have been originally covered in bronze
sheets. The wall of the rotunda is 6 metres thick and has
seven alcoves which are alternatively semi-circular and
rectangular.
INTRODUCTION
porch
Interior of dome
dome
2
THE ARCHITECTS OF THE PANTHEON
The Pantheon was originally built by
(1)Marcus Agrippa in 27 BC in the
Campus Martius. Agrippa’s
Pantheon was destroyed in the 80
AD fire, was rebuilt by Domitian, and
burned again in 110 AD. A recent re-
examination of brick stamps has
determined that reconstruction
began soon after the second fire of
110 AD and was completed by
Hadrian (123-126 AD). Design of the
structure we see today was thus
begun under Trajan’s reign, and was
very likely designed by Trajan’s
favorite architect, (2)Apollodorus of
Damascus, although a few of the
decorative features must have been
designed under Hadrian (The 14th
Emperor of Rome). The original
inscription was reused by (3)Hadrian,
contributing to the confusion which
existed over when the current
structure was built and by whom.
1
2
3
3
PLAN SCALE 1 : 500
ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS 4
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE 1 : 500
5ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS
SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE 1 : 500
6
ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS
SECTION A-A
SCALE 1 : 500
A A
7
ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS
MATERIALS
The materials used to built the Pantheon was mainly of brick and concrete. This concrete is a mixture of mortar with
small stones that is mixed with limestone (travertine), bricks and other materials.
The Romans were aware of the heavy nature of their buildings. So as they build the Pantheon, lighter materials were
used as the building rises higher and higher. This use of lighter materials on top alleviated the immense weight of the
dome. The series of arches mainly built by using bricks.
On the lowest level is the travertine, then a mixture of travertine and tufa, then tufa and brick, then all brick was
used around the drum section of the dome. The dome is made from a light tufa and scoria (a type of pumice) mix
of concrete (caementa) and its interior is further lightened by five rings of 28 coffers which reduce in size as they rise
towards the center of the dome.
Travertine
Travertine & Tufa
Tufa & Bricks
Bricks
Pumice
8
LOAD DISTRIBUTION
The massive size of the Pantheon is accompanied by a tremendous weight. Roman architects used
ingenious design to create a stable structure without the use of internal supports.
The tremendous weight of the stone on top of the entryways, windows, and passages would cause
them to collapse. The architects solved this problem with the use of arches. Arches take the
tremendous force of the stone above it and redirect this force through its sides to the Pantheon’s
support walls and piers. These support walls and pillars provide a horizontal normal force to
counteract the force of the stone above the arches. The structure’s weight is channeled through
the piers to its foundation.
Redirected Force
Force of Supports Force of Supports
Weight of Stone
9
LOAD DISTRIBUTION
Domes maintain their shape through a balance of tension and compression forces. The figure shows a better understanding on how domes
work. The vertical lines of the dome are called meridians. At the top of the dome, the meridians push together under the domes weight,
creating compression forces. Towards the bottom of the dome, the meridians are pushing outwards, stretching the dome apart with horizontal
tension forces.
At a certain level on all domes (indicated in the figure below by the dotted line), there is an area that is neither in tension or compression. The
tension and compression forces must both be dealt with to enable the dome to stand. To deal with the massive tension forces, the Roman
architects poured several layers of concrete around the base of the dome. These layers are called step rings, and they provide a normal force
to push inward against the tension forces that push out. The rings also help to redirect the tension forces down into the walls below.
Compression
Tension
Step Rings
10
11
GEOMETRY AND FORM
SURFACE STRUCTURE, is defined as “members are united as one homogeneous entity to form
the structure and spaces.” Hence, Pantheon upper structure, known as the oldest concrete shell,
supports on it own with these elements stated below. It acts a roof and has created a more spacious
and monumentally spacial quality.
SOLID CONSTRUCTION, which “relies on homogeneous mass” are referring to the lower part of
Pantheon which has used heavy construction materials (limestone, bricks) as supports and the
elements stated here.
Further explanation and justifications will be provided in the following pages.
OCULUS
COFFERS
STEPPED RINGS
COLUMNS
WALLS
12
GEOMETRY AND FORM
The Pantheon consists of a rectangular portico with three lanes of columns fronting a circular building
which designed as a huge hemispherical dome, that is 43.3 meters in diameter.
The dome is modelled on a sphere within a cylinder, of a same diameter and of a height that has the
dimension of the dome’s radius at 21.65 meters.
An interesting observation to make is that the dome internal geometry creates a perfect sphere. The
height of the rotunda to the top of its dome matches its diameter.
CYLINDER
PERFECT SPHEREGRID
13
GEOMETRY AND FORM
IN FACT, the form of the Pantheon is derived from the circle and SQUARE in plan and section view.
The Pantheon’s design begins with a square subdivided into a grid. Certain points of the grid intersects circles.
Refer to the plan view
On the section view, the Pantheon likewise starts out with a subdivided grid. A rectangular form derives from
fairly simple geometric subdivisions.
Image resource: http://architecturerevived.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-pantheon-romes-architecture-of.html
14
GEOMETRY AND FORM
Circles are arranged into overlapping quadrants, to render out a complex star pattern. The intersection of
circle form an 18 pointed star, which divided the Pantheon into 18 part quadrants and a five pointed star.
Apply the same circle and stars in section view, the intersection points bring out the rectilinear form together
with curves. Overlap the circle at the top to find the sacred dimensions of the coffers around the oculus and
the dome.
Image resource: http://architecturerevived.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-pantheon-romes-architecture-of.html
The dome maps a relationship of earth and man to heaven. With the touch of culture and belief, the structure
and form become more sophisticated behind.
DIMENSION OF THE DOME
5 POINTED STAR
LOAD DISTRIBUTION
The oculus, or eyehole, is
27 feet in diameter, and
made up of 4.5 foot thick
ring of bricks. The ring acts
exactly like an arch,
except that its ends are
joined together.
Compressive forces are
redirected along the ring’s
body. The only difference
between the ring and the
arch is that the
compression forces come
from all directions. These
forces wedge the ring
stones tightly together. The
compression forces
cancel each other out
and the top of the dome is
left in a state of horizontal
equilibrium. This oculus ring
is nothing but a hole due
to the fact that as the
structure goes up, the
materials that was used
becomes lighter to a
certain extent that no
material, in this case
bricks, can be cut into a
thin layer thus the hole.
Net Compression Force = 0
15
Surprisingly, right where the compression forces are the greatest
on the dome (the top), the Roman architects chose to have
nothing but air. The oculus, or eyehole, is 27 feet in diameter,
and made up of 4.5 foot thick ring of bricks. The ring acts exactly
like an arch, except that its ends are joined together.
Compressive forces are redirected along the ring’s body. The
only difference between the ring and the arch is that the
compression forces come from all directions. These forces
wedge the ring stones tightly together. The compression forces
cancel each other out and the top of the dome is left in a state
of horizontal equilibrium.
The oculus was only reinforced by a row of bricks and bronze-
framed.
THE OCULUS
NET COMPRESSION FORCE = -0 N
Centering was not required for the
lower third of the dome, so the
Romans used a lighter centring system
supported from the dome’s interior,
second cornice line.
compression
tension
51.82°
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 16
INNER DOME – COFFERING
Scaffolding
Coffer
Mold
Coffer molds were installed and the concrete was
poured in section.
There are five rows of coffer and each ring is smaller
than the one beneath it.
Workers assembled each row of coffers separately using
scaffolding as shown in figure 1. While waiting for the row
of concrete to harden, they moved on to another.
KEEPING THE DOME IN PLACE
The huge and heavy dome is kept in place because of the coffering inner dome. Recent engineering studies
have
shown each coffer only reduce 5% of weight. 5% of a dome that weight 5,000 tons(227,000 kilogram) is a lot.
Rows of coffering also form ribs acting as stiffening element form preventing the dome form deflecting.
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 17COFFERS
Construction Method
The inner dome
Rotunda wall
outward forces
Downwards
forces
Because is a dome surface structure, its weight naturally go outward as well as downward. The weight
pushing outward is called hoop stress. This hoop stress had been solved by starting the inner dome
(coffer)inside the rotunda wall. The rotunda wall is higher than the inside dome and act as shoulder to
hold the dome inwards. Therefore, from the outside the starting of the dome cannot really be
determined.
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
COFFERS 18
Construction Method
Top row of coffer contain 3 recesses
The rest of the row of coffers have 4 recesses
The space between the top and the bottoms of
the coffer remains constant, while the space
between the side of each coffer diminish as they
proceed up the dome, much like the line of
latitude and longitude of a globe.
Forces is that distributed
evenly
throughout the surface is
then
breaking down into
smaller forces
in the recesses. Thus less
down the forces carried
by the whole dome.
Coffer Design
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
COFFERS 19
Construction Method
Coffer Design
The effect of the dome is spectacular, it was a surprise when one entered the rotunda. Ones eyes are
carried up to the oculus which lets in enough light to make the whole area seem light and airy.
The coffers gives the effect of producing the magnitude of light and darks in the dome, constantly
changing as the beam of light and its projected circle from the oculus moved with the sun. This gives one
the impression that the building is dynamic and not solid and weighty, but light, airy and uplifting, like the sky
outside on a clear day. The dome seemed to expand as one looks at it.
Shadow
Light
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
COFFERS 20
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
TENSION FORCES
NORMAL FORCE OF THE
ADDED CONCRETE IN THE
STEPPED RINGS, ACTING
AGAINST THE INTERNAL
THRUST OF THE DOME
WEIGHT OF THE DOME
HALF SECTION/ ELEVATION OF MAIN STRUCTURE
STEPPED RINGS
THE RINGS REDIRECT
THE TENSION FORCES
TO THE WALL BELOW
On the outside surface of the pantheon Dome, there is a series of seven step- rings half way up the dome, and then the dome
line changes into a circular line. There is 7 rings stacked on top of each other, and non uniform in diamter. The rings have its
outside edge resting on the center of the ring below. It appears to be some 7.5 feet (2.3 m) thick with a horizontal distance to
the next ring about this same distance. The remaining 6 step-rings are stepped inward much like placing a series of machine
washers, one above the other with their diameters decreasing as they are stacked. The height of these 6 rings vary, and they are
estimated to be 2'- 6" (0.8 m) on the average. The horizontal distance to the next of these smaller rings is estimated to be 4 feet
(1.2 m). There is an exterior stairway leading through these rings to the oculus.
STEPPED RINGS OF THE DOME 21
STACK CONCEPT OF RINGS
each ring is stacked on top of
each other, the end of the upper
ring starts at the centre of the
ring below allowing the weight
to be uniformly distributed
across the concrete and
eventually down to the wall
below. The diameter of the rings
decrease as they are stacked.
THE CONCRETE IS
REINFORCED WITH
LEAD PLATES ON EACH
STEPPING
LEAD PLATES
Conclusion: elimination of the
stepped rings would cause the
dome to be pushed outwards
beyond the thrust line, and
result in cracking of the dome,
and possible Structure
collapsing.
Exterior stairway leading
to the oculus
Weight of ( dome +
subsequent upper rings )
oculus
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
STEPPED RINGS OF THE DOME
22
FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS)
A column is an upright beam and a linear element- the
bearing capacity is mainly provided by bending
moment action, that is the couple produced by the
tensile and compressive stresses at opposite edges of
the same section of the beam multiplied by the
moment arm/ distance measured between the point
where forces are applied and the point that is pinned.
Columns in the Pantheon is mostly located at the
portico, which consists of 16 towering columns that
were conducted with Egyptian granite, porphyry and
white marble bases. Standing at 39 feet (11.8 meters)
tall and five feet (1.5 meters) in diameter, each column
weighs about 60 tons and supports additional loading
from the roof structure above. Inside, you will see a
series of many more columns in colors of red, grey, and
crème in various sizes and designs.
CORINTHIAN ORDER
The Corinthian order is the most
decorative of the three styles of
columns. Corinthian also uses
the method of entasis to make
the shafts appear straight to the
human eye. The Corinthian
capitals have flowers and
leaves below a small scroll that
connect to the shaft and end
on a circular or square platform
that is the base. All columns of
the Pantheon are of this style.
Positions of the 16 columns (red) in the portico
23
Columns can support a roof or a beam or they
can be purely decorative. In the case of the
Pantheon, most columns are used to create a
load path for forces created by the weight of
materials used on roof to the foundation in the
ground. A strong construction stone, the
granite within the columns of the pantheon has
a compressive strength of 19000 psi.
The travel of compressing forces from the roof towards the foundation
FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS) 24
An arch is a structure that is usually
made of stone, brick, concrete, or
steel. (Figure 13.) Featuring curved
contour, it is design to support or
strengthen a structural design via its
ability to distribute load. As in most
curved elements, the couple
produced by the internal stresses
associated with the horizontal
boundary reaction creates the
bearing capacity in an arch. The
arch can be classified as a
construction technique where the
elements of the structure themselves
are in compression instead of tension
in the material; thrust instead of pull
at the abutments.
Most arches are built of wedge-
shaped blocks- the top center stone
is known as the keystone and is the
final block to be inserted when
assembling an arch. During
construction, wooden scaffolding
often supports arches prior to the
removal of the frame. The finished
product results in two arms of
masonry arches press against a
keystone to create a stable structure
in which the moment produced by
the two arms of masonry are
canceled out.
Arches on the rotunda wall visible on the exterior walls
FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS) 25
The structure of the Pantheon
is comprised of a series of
intersecting arches. The arches
rest on eight piers which
support eight round-headed
arches which run through the
drum from its inner to its outer
face. The arches correspond
to the eight bays on the floor
level that house statues.
The dome itself is supported by
a series of arches that run
horizontally round.
In other words, relieving arches
direct the loads to the thicker
parts of the wall between the
niches. They provide a
structural component to the
wall that helps prevent
excessive creep or settlement
in any one place within the
wall. Note that the
distinguishable characteristics
of concrete, ancient or
modern, are that it gains
strength slowly over a period
of time and that it is
susceptible to the
phenomenon known as
creep, which is the slow
deformation of the material
over time.
Drawing of structural system of arches/ribs in rotunda wall.
FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS) 26
Pantheon Modeling Process
Model Making ProcessMODEL MAKING PROCESS 27
THE MASS
1.First, we built a base of the pantheon which includes layers of steps. Then lift up to certain dimension to
build the rotunda wall according to the plan drawings. (Refer to figure 1. 2. 3.)
2.Columns of the front façade is made and try to join with the rotunda wall. (Refer to figure 4. 5. 6. )
3.2.1.
4. 5. 6.
MODEL MAKING PROCESS 28
THE OUTER LAYER OF DOME
(refer to figure 7. 8. 9. )
The outer layer of dome is calculated to gain the dimension to cut in balsa.
8. 9.7.
11. 12.10.
( refer to figure 10. 11. 12. )
Calculated and cut pieces are dipped into the hot water then bend to an ideal curve. It is then dried
by hair dryer.
MODEL MAKING PROCESS 29
THE INNER LAYER OF DOME - COFFERING
(refer to figure 13. 14. 15. )
The coffers are cut differently according to layer. After that is dipped in hot water to be ready for the
bending session later.
13. 14. 15.
( refer to figure 16. 17. )
Dipped coffers pieces are bend using masking tape and dry it until achieved certain curve.
16. 17.
MODEL MAKING PROCESS 30
18. 19. 20.
(refer to figure 18. 19. 20. )
Layers of coffers pieces are attached to the rotunda wall, one layer stacking on another layer to bring out
the depth of the coffers like in the pantheon itself.
MODEL MAKING PROCESS 31
Model Making Process
THE DETAIL STRUCTURE ( COFFER)
21. 22. 23.
(refer to figure 21.22.23)
In order to achieve layers of coffers, clay are used and squares in different dimension are formed.
Squares are attached to each other followed by dimension. Lastly, the outer surface is made to cover up
the coffers.
24. 25. 26.
(refer to figure 24.25.26)
The details of the coffer is done with the grid bar representing the force distribution inwards each recesses.
MODEL MAKING PROCESS 32
Model Making Process
Final product
Front view of the model
Side view of the model
MODEL MAKING PROCESS 33
Model Making Process
DIFFICULTIES & SOLUTION IN MODELLING
1) Inaccuracy of dimension
Zero error happened all the time during the cutting. Therefore, it ended up resulting in
different heights of the columns. Some of them might not be able to touch the ground.
Therefore, things need to be cut precisely and measured accurately beforehand.
2) Dome dimension
Making dome is the hardest part in modelling Pantheon. As it involves a lot of calculation in
order to make the dome by pieces of balsa wood. Making the curve into 2d and get its
dimension. We divided the dome curve into 14 pieces of balsa wood to enhance the
curve effect. However, some of them might not be joined perfectly and therefore left a
gap in between. Problem are solved by bending every pieces into same curve to reduce
down the gap .
3) Fragility of Balsa
Pantheon building might need a lot of bending. (the rotunda wall and the dome). Some
pieces was broken and was hard to form certain curve that we wanted. Problem is solved
by increasing the temperature of the hot water that dipped in and increase the time of
dipping.
MODEL MAKING PROCESS 34
the Pantheon represents the highest achievement of Roman architecture, both formally and
structurally. It combines boldness, scale, and mastery of every architectural art.
For whatever the reason, the Pantheon is the only structure of its age, size and span that has
successfully survived the scourge of time and gravity and has remained pristine in splendor
and beauty. While the Pantheon may be divinely protected, there are more earthbound
reasons for its survival as well. We can attribute its longetivity to the quality of materials used.
Perhaps it is because of very strong concrete with pozzolona cement that we are able to too
can marvel at the wonder that Michelangelo once described to look more like the work of
angels, not humans.
The whole combination of dome was one of the greatest creations the Roman ever did. Every
part of the dome is needed to support each other. Besides, the detailing is even existed not
only for aesthetic purpose but also functionally, to distribute forces to their respective parts.
The wisdom of reducing the thickness of the dome and at last to be able to leave a
hole(oculus) had made Pantheon remain amazing and respected by the modern
generations. For whatever the reason, the Pantheon is the only structure of its age, size and
span that has successfully survived the scourge of time and gravity and has remained pristine
in splendor and beauty.
CONCLUSION 35
1. http://www.generativeart.com/salgado/salgado.htm
2. http://harvey.ro/THE_DOME_OF_THE_PANTHEON.html
3. http://www.generativeart.com/salgado/salgado.htm
4. http://www.romanconcrete.com/docs/chapt01/chapt01.htm
5. http://architecturerevived.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-pantheon-romes-architecture-
of.html
REFERENCES 36

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Comparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco Architecture
Comparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco ArchitectureComparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco Architecture
Comparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco ArchitectureB. Nicole Aloyon
 
Early Christian Architecture
Early Christian ArchitectureEarly Christian Architecture
Early Christian ArchitectureHarpreet Oberoi
 
St. peter's basillica
St. peter's basillicaSt. peter's basillica
St. peter's basillicaRajat Nainwal
 
Early christian architecture
Early christian architectureEarly christian architecture
Early christian architecturevaibhav ghodke
 
Byzantine architecture ppt
Byzantine architecture pptByzantine architecture ppt
Byzantine architecture pptDespoina Potnia
 
The Panthenon "Case Study"
The Panthenon "Case Study"The Panthenon "Case Study"
The Panthenon "Case Study"Mohtady Mohamed
 
Baroque architecture
Baroque architectureBaroque architecture
Baroque architecturemfresnillo
 
Hagia Sophia, Istanbul
Hagia Sophia, IstanbulHagia Sophia, Istanbul
Hagia Sophia, IstanbulJerry Daperro
 
Class 5 History of roman architecture
Class 5 History of roman architectureClass 5 History of roman architecture
Class 5 History of roman architectureBekark
 
Aerospace Museum , california
Aerospace Museum , californiaAerospace Museum , california
Aerospace Museum , californiaRifquth sb
 
Gothic Architecture
Gothic ArchitectureGothic Architecture
Gothic Architecturemfresnillo
 
Introduction to Renaissance Architecture
Introduction to Renaissance ArchitectureIntroduction to Renaissance Architecture
Introduction to Renaissance ArchitectureAmal Shah
 
Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.
Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.
Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.Lovely Singh
 
theory in antiquity & rennaissance
theory in antiquity & rennaissancetheory in antiquity & rennaissance
theory in antiquity & rennaissancesaiyangoku
 

Mais procurados (20)

Comparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco Architecture
Comparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco ArchitectureComparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco Architecture
Comparative Analysis of Baroque and Rococco Architecture
 
Senate House.pptx
Senate House.pptxSenate House.pptx
Senate House.pptx
 
Early Christian Architecture
Early Christian ArchitectureEarly Christian Architecture
Early Christian Architecture
 
St. peter's basillica
St. peter's basillicaSt. peter's basillica
St. peter's basillica
 
Early christian architecture
Early christian architectureEarly christian architecture
Early christian architecture
 
Byzantine architecture ppt
Byzantine architecture pptByzantine architecture ppt
Byzantine architecture ppt
 
Anderia palladio
Anderia palladioAnderia palladio
Anderia palladio
 
The Panthenon "Case Study"
The Panthenon "Case Study"The Panthenon "Case Study"
The Panthenon "Case Study"
 
Pantheon Rome 4
Pantheon Rome 4Pantheon Rome 4
Pantheon Rome 4
 
Baroque architecture
Baroque architectureBaroque architecture
Baroque architecture
 
Hagia Sophia, Istanbul
Hagia Sophia, IstanbulHagia Sophia, Istanbul
Hagia Sophia, Istanbul
 
Works of mies
Works of miesWorks of mies
Works of mies
 
Class 5 History of roman architecture
Class 5 History of roman architectureClass 5 History of roman architecture
Class 5 History of roman architecture
 
Aerospace Museum , california
Aerospace Museum , californiaAerospace Museum , california
Aerospace Museum , california
 
St peter basilica
St peter basilica St peter basilica
St peter basilica
 
Gothic Architecture
Gothic ArchitectureGothic Architecture
Gothic Architecture
 
Introduction to Renaissance Architecture
Introduction to Renaissance ArchitectureIntroduction to Renaissance Architecture
Introduction to Renaissance Architecture
 
Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.
Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.
Origin of Neoclassical architecture and the architects involved in it.
 
theory in antiquity & rennaissance
theory in antiquity & rennaissancetheory in antiquity & rennaissance
theory in antiquity & rennaissance
 
Ancient greek architecture
Ancient greek architectureAncient greek architecture
Ancient greek architecture
 

Semelhante a The Pantheon's Dome Architecture

MDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
MDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnMDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
MDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnMadhuMallapur
 
Socio6 history of architecture
Socio6   history of architectureSocio6   history of architecture
Socio6 history of architectureYvan Gumbao
 
Ancient Roman Architecture
Ancient  Roman  ArchitectureAncient  Roman  Architecture
Ancient Roman Architectureguestf607233
 
CLASSICAL ARCH.pptx
CLASSICAL ARCH.pptxCLASSICAL ARCH.pptx
CLASSICAL ARCH.pptxKRISHMADUWAL
 
Roman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappach
Roman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappachRoman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappach
Roman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappachLoren Schwappach
 
Edited essay
Edited essayEdited essay
Edited essayAh Jun
 
G 9 art 1st grading classical art architecture
G 9 art 1st grading classical art architectureG 9 art 1st grading classical art architecture
G 9 art 1st grading classical art architectureDang de Leon
 
Renaissance part 3 bramante palladio
Renaissance part 3 bramante palladioRenaissance part 3 bramante palladio
Renaissance part 3 bramante palladioPurnoor Khan
 
Lecture 1 introduction
Lecture 1   introductionLecture 1   introduction
Lecture 1 introductionHashimammar
 
Ancient Roman Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.D
Ancient  Roman  Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.DAncient  Roman  Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.D
Ancient Roman Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.DSheza Fatima
 
YaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdf
YaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdfYaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdf
YaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdfGirumAlemneh1
 

Semelhante a The Pantheon's Dome Architecture (20)

Pantheon, Rome v 3
Pantheon, Rome  v 3Pantheon, Rome  v 3
Pantheon, Rome v 3
 
MDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
MDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnMDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
MDD.pptxnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
 
Pantheon
PantheonPantheon
Pantheon
 
Socio6 history of architecture
Socio6   history of architectureSocio6   history of architecture
Socio6 history of architecture
 
Ancient Roman Architecture
Ancient  Roman  ArchitectureAncient  Roman  Architecture
Ancient Roman Architecture
 
CLASSICAL ARCH.pptx
CLASSICAL ARCH.pptxCLASSICAL ARCH.pptx
CLASSICAL ARCH.pptx
 
Roman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappach
Roman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappachRoman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappach
Roman engineering -assn_4_-_individual_project_-_schwappach
 
BOOK
BOOKBOOK
BOOK
 
Arts and graphics
Arts and graphicsArts and graphics
Arts and graphics
 
Barmante
BarmanteBarmante
Barmante
 
Mannerism Architecture
Mannerism ArchitectureMannerism Architecture
Mannerism Architecture
 
Edited essay
Edited essayEdited essay
Edited essay
 
Mannerism architecture
Mannerism architectureMannerism architecture
Mannerism architecture
 
Lecture-1.ppt
Lecture-1.pptLecture-1.ppt
Lecture-1.ppt
 
Lecture-1.ppt
Lecture-1.pptLecture-1.ppt
Lecture-1.ppt
 
G 9 art 1st grading classical art architecture
G 9 art 1st grading classical art architectureG 9 art 1st grading classical art architecture
G 9 art 1st grading classical art architecture
 
Renaissance part 3 bramante palladio
Renaissance part 3 bramante palladioRenaissance part 3 bramante palladio
Renaissance part 3 bramante palladio
 
Lecture 1 introduction
Lecture 1   introductionLecture 1   introduction
Lecture 1 introduction
 
Ancient Roman Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.D
Ancient  Roman  Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.DAncient  Roman  Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.D
Ancient Roman Architecture from 2nd B.C to 1st A.D
 
YaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdf
YaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdfYaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdf
YaleUniversityArtGalleryvsSt.LouisArtMuseum.pdf
 

Mais de JoyeeLee0131

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEFBUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEFJoyeeLee0131
 
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORT
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORTBUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORT
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORTJoyeeLee0131
 
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEFBUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEFJoyeeLee0131
 
REPORT AND CALCULATION
REPORT AND CALCULATIONREPORT AND CALCULATION
REPORT AND CALCULATIONJoyeeLee0131
 
Building Science Project 1 Brief
Building Science Project 1 BriefBuilding Science Project 1 Brief
Building Science Project 1 BriefJoyeeLee0131
 
BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15
BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15
BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15JoyeeLee0131
 
Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield
Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield
Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield JoyeeLee0131
 
Reaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & Urbanism
Reaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & UrbanismReaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & Urbanism
Reaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & UrbanismJoyeeLee0131
 
Personal Values Statement
Personal Values StatementPersonal Values Statement
Personal Values StatementJoyeeLee0131
 
Presentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof House
Presentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof HousePresentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof House
Presentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof HouseJoyeeLee0131
 
Table of Content & Abstracts
Table of Content & AbstractsTable of Content & Abstracts
Table of Content & AbstractsJoyeeLee0131
 
Case Study Paper Topic Proposal
Case Study Paper Topic ProposalCase Study Paper Topic Proposal
Case Study Paper Topic ProposalJoyeeLee0131
 
B. structure project 2 brief august 2015
B. structure project 2 brief august 2015B. structure project 2 brief august 2015
B. structure project 2 brief august 2015JoyeeLee0131
 
B. structure project 1 brief august 2015
B. structure project 1 brief august 2015B. structure project 1 brief august 2015
B. structure project 1 brief august 2015JoyeeLee0131
 
Building Structure Project 1 Analysis Report
Building Structure Project 1 Analysis ReportBuilding Structure Project 1 Analysis Report
Building Structure Project 1 Analysis ReportJoyeeLee0131
 
Building Service Project 2 Case Study Report
Building Service Project 2 Case Study ReportBuilding Service Project 2 Case Study Report
Building Service Project 2 Case Study ReportJoyeeLee0131
 
Lembah Bujang Site Analysis
Lembah Bujang Site AnalysisLembah Bujang Site Analysis
Lembah Bujang Site AnalysisJoyeeLee0131
 
Building Construction Project 1 Brief
Building Construction Project 1 BriefBuilding Construction Project 1 Brief
Building Construction Project 1 BriefJoyeeLee0131
 
Building Construction Project 1 Shelter Report
Building Construction Project 1 Shelter ReportBuilding Construction Project 1 Shelter Report
Building Construction Project 1 Shelter ReportJoyeeLee0131
 

Mais de JoyeeLee0131 (20)

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEFBUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 BRIEF
 
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORT
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORTBUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORT
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 2 REPORT
 
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEFBUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEF
BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT 1 BRIEF
 
REPORT AND CALCULATION
REPORT AND CALCULATIONREPORT AND CALCULATION
REPORT AND CALCULATION
 
Building Science Project 1 Brief
Building Science Project 1 BriefBuilding Science Project 1 Brief
Building Science Project 1 Brief
 
BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15
BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15
BUILDING SCIENCE II: ACOUSTICS AND LIGHTING ANALYSIS OF DONUTES CAFE, SS15
 
Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield
Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield
Cognitive Mapping of Brickfield
 
Reaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & Urbanism
Reaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & UrbanismReaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & Urbanism
Reaction Papers toward Theories of Architecture & Urbanism
 
Personal Values Statement
Personal Values StatementPersonal Values Statement
Personal Values Statement
 
Presentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof House
Presentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof HousePresentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof House
Presentation on Flat Roof Double in Safari Roof House
 
Table of Content & Abstracts
Table of Content & AbstractsTable of Content & Abstracts
Table of Content & Abstracts
 
Case Study Paper Topic Proposal
Case Study Paper Topic ProposalCase Study Paper Topic Proposal
Case Study Paper Topic Proposal
 
Report
ReportReport
Report
 
B. structure project 2 brief august 2015
B. structure project 2 brief august 2015B. structure project 2 brief august 2015
B. structure project 2 brief august 2015
 
B. structure project 1 brief august 2015
B. structure project 1 brief august 2015B. structure project 1 brief august 2015
B. structure project 1 brief august 2015
 
Building Structure Project 1 Analysis Report
Building Structure Project 1 Analysis ReportBuilding Structure Project 1 Analysis Report
Building Structure Project 1 Analysis Report
 
Building Service Project 2 Case Study Report
Building Service Project 2 Case Study ReportBuilding Service Project 2 Case Study Report
Building Service Project 2 Case Study Report
 
Lembah Bujang Site Analysis
Lembah Bujang Site AnalysisLembah Bujang Site Analysis
Lembah Bujang Site Analysis
 
Building Construction Project 1 Brief
Building Construction Project 1 BriefBuilding Construction Project 1 Brief
Building Construction Project 1 Brief
 
Building Construction Project 1 Shelter Report
Building Construction Project 1 Shelter ReportBuilding Construction Project 1 Shelter Report
Building Construction Project 1 Shelter Report
 

The Pantheon's Dome Architecture

  • 1. THE PANTHEON ROME, ITALY BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 2, PROJECT 2 BY: CHAN PIN QI, LEE JO EE, MAHI ABDUL MUHSIN, TAN SHING YOEU, TAN ZI JIAN, DANAR JOVIAN
  • 2. CONTENT HISTORY OF BUILDING 2 INTRODUCTION 3 ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS 4 MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION METHODS/DETAILS FORCES & LOAD DISTRIBUTION EXPERIMENTATION & PROCESS OF MODEL GROUP MEMBERS: CHAN PIN QI ( 0314676 ) LEE JO YEE ( 0314880 ) MAHI ABDUL MUHSIN ( 0314421 ) DANAR JOVIAN (0314575 ) TAN SHING YOEU ( 0314850 ) TAN ZI JIAN ( 0318291 )
  • 3. INTRODUCTION The Pantheon is the best preserved building from ancient Rome and was completed in c.125 CE in the reign of Hadrian. Its magnificent dome is a lasting testimony to the genuis of Roman architects and as the building stands virtually intact, it offers a unique opportunity for the modern visitors to step back 2000 years and experience the glory that was Rome. Until, the 20th century, the Pantheon was the largest concrete structure in the world. The Pantheon was dedicated to pan theos, "all the gods." When it became a church, it was dedicated to the Virgin Mary and all the martyrs. The Pantheon was originally built in 27-25 BC by the magistrate Marcus Agrippa (his name appears on the inscription outside), to commemorate the victory of Actium over Antony and Cleopatra. This original temple burned down in 80 AD. The second temple was dedicated to every known god, from which the Pantheon gets its name. Hadrian himself is credited with the basic plan, an architectural design that was unique for the time. . HISTORY 1
  • 4. THE EXTERIOR & INTERIOR AN OVERVIEW OF THE EXTERIOR The building consists of two principal parts - the porch, which is very classical Greek and the circular main building which is more roman in style. The circular building is built with brick and concrete but was originally faced with white marble stucco to match the porch in appearance. The dome is concrete with the external surface originally covered in bronze. the whole building stands on a 1.3 m high base which originally extended a further 7 metres in front of the colonnade, steps in numidian yellow marble extended from the outer ends of this base. INTERIOR The Pantheon may well be the first building from Classical architecture where the interior is deliberately made to outshine the exterior. The circular part of the building or rotunda was entranced via two bronze doors measuring 12 x 7.5. The rotunda measures 43.2 m in diameter which is exactly the maximum height of the dome, itself a perfect hemisphere. At the very top of the dome is an opening to the sky (oculus) which is 8.8 m in diameter and has a decorative bronze sheet frieze. The dome is made from a light tufa and scoria (a type of pumice) mix of concrete (caementa) and its interior is further lightened by five rings of 28 coffers which reduce in size as they rise towards the centre of the dome. These may have been originally covered in bronze sheets. The wall of the rotunda is 6 metres thick and has seven alcoves which are alternatively semi-circular and rectangular. INTRODUCTION porch Interior of dome dome 2
  • 5. THE ARCHITECTS OF THE PANTHEON The Pantheon was originally built by (1)Marcus Agrippa in 27 BC in the Campus Martius. Agrippa’s Pantheon was destroyed in the 80 AD fire, was rebuilt by Domitian, and burned again in 110 AD. A recent re- examination of brick stamps has determined that reconstruction began soon after the second fire of 110 AD and was completed by Hadrian (123-126 AD). Design of the structure we see today was thus begun under Trajan’s reign, and was very likely designed by Trajan’s favorite architect, (2)Apollodorus of Damascus, although a few of the decorative features must have been designed under Hadrian (The 14th Emperor of Rome). The original inscription was reused by (3)Hadrian, contributing to the confusion which existed over when the current structure was built and by whom. 1 2 3 3
  • 6. PLAN SCALE 1 : 500 ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS 4
  • 7. FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1 : 500 5ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS
  • 8. SIDE ELEVATION SCALE 1 : 500 6 ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS
  • 9. SECTION A-A SCALE 1 : 500 A A 7 ORTHOGRAPHIC DRAWINGS
  • 10. MATERIALS The materials used to built the Pantheon was mainly of brick and concrete. This concrete is a mixture of mortar with small stones that is mixed with limestone (travertine), bricks and other materials. The Romans were aware of the heavy nature of their buildings. So as they build the Pantheon, lighter materials were used as the building rises higher and higher. This use of lighter materials on top alleviated the immense weight of the dome. The series of arches mainly built by using bricks. On the lowest level is the travertine, then a mixture of travertine and tufa, then tufa and brick, then all brick was used around the drum section of the dome. The dome is made from a light tufa and scoria (a type of pumice) mix of concrete (caementa) and its interior is further lightened by five rings of 28 coffers which reduce in size as they rise towards the center of the dome. Travertine Travertine & Tufa Tufa & Bricks Bricks Pumice 8
  • 11. LOAD DISTRIBUTION The massive size of the Pantheon is accompanied by a tremendous weight. Roman architects used ingenious design to create a stable structure without the use of internal supports. The tremendous weight of the stone on top of the entryways, windows, and passages would cause them to collapse. The architects solved this problem with the use of arches. Arches take the tremendous force of the stone above it and redirect this force through its sides to the Pantheon’s support walls and piers. These support walls and pillars provide a horizontal normal force to counteract the force of the stone above the arches. The structure’s weight is channeled through the piers to its foundation. Redirected Force Force of Supports Force of Supports Weight of Stone 9
  • 12. LOAD DISTRIBUTION Domes maintain their shape through a balance of tension and compression forces. The figure shows a better understanding on how domes work. The vertical lines of the dome are called meridians. At the top of the dome, the meridians push together under the domes weight, creating compression forces. Towards the bottom of the dome, the meridians are pushing outwards, stretching the dome apart with horizontal tension forces. At a certain level on all domes (indicated in the figure below by the dotted line), there is an area that is neither in tension or compression. The tension and compression forces must both be dealt with to enable the dome to stand. To deal with the massive tension forces, the Roman architects poured several layers of concrete around the base of the dome. These layers are called step rings, and they provide a normal force to push inward against the tension forces that push out. The rings also help to redirect the tension forces down into the walls below. Compression Tension Step Rings 10
  • 13. 11 GEOMETRY AND FORM SURFACE STRUCTURE, is defined as “members are united as one homogeneous entity to form the structure and spaces.” Hence, Pantheon upper structure, known as the oldest concrete shell, supports on it own with these elements stated below. It acts a roof and has created a more spacious and monumentally spacial quality. SOLID CONSTRUCTION, which “relies on homogeneous mass” are referring to the lower part of Pantheon which has used heavy construction materials (limestone, bricks) as supports and the elements stated here. Further explanation and justifications will be provided in the following pages. OCULUS COFFERS STEPPED RINGS COLUMNS WALLS
  • 14. 12 GEOMETRY AND FORM The Pantheon consists of a rectangular portico with three lanes of columns fronting a circular building which designed as a huge hemispherical dome, that is 43.3 meters in diameter. The dome is modelled on a sphere within a cylinder, of a same diameter and of a height that has the dimension of the dome’s radius at 21.65 meters. An interesting observation to make is that the dome internal geometry creates a perfect sphere. The height of the rotunda to the top of its dome matches its diameter. CYLINDER PERFECT SPHEREGRID
  • 15. 13 GEOMETRY AND FORM IN FACT, the form of the Pantheon is derived from the circle and SQUARE in plan and section view. The Pantheon’s design begins with a square subdivided into a grid. Certain points of the grid intersects circles. Refer to the plan view On the section view, the Pantheon likewise starts out with a subdivided grid. A rectangular form derives from fairly simple geometric subdivisions. Image resource: http://architecturerevived.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-pantheon-romes-architecture-of.html
  • 16. 14 GEOMETRY AND FORM Circles are arranged into overlapping quadrants, to render out a complex star pattern. The intersection of circle form an 18 pointed star, which divided the Pantheon into 18 part quadrants and a five pointed star. Apply the same circle and stars in section view, the intersection points bring out the rectilinear form together with curves. Overlap the circle at the top to find the sacred dimensions of the coffers around the oculus and the dome. Image resource: http://architecturerevived.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-pantheon-romes-architecture-of.html The dome maps a relationship of earth and man to heaven. With the touch of culture and belief, the structure and form become more sophisticated behind. DIMENSION OF THE DOME 5 POINTED STAR
  • 17. LOAD DISTRIBUTION The oculus, or eyehole, is 27 feet in diameter, and made up of 4.5 foot thick ring of bricks. The ring acts exactly like an arch, except that its ends are joined together. Compressive forces are redirected along the ring’s body. The only difference between the ring and the arch is that the compression forces come from all directions. These forces wedge the ring stones tightly together. The compression forces cancel each other out and the top of the dome is left in a state of horizontal equilibrium. This oculus ring is nothing but a hole due to the fact that as the structure goes up, the materials that was used becomes lighter to a certain extent that no material, in this case bricks, can be cut into a thin layer thus the hole. Net Compression Force = 0 15
  • 18. Surprisingly, right where the compression forces are the greatest on the dome (the top), the Roman architects chose to have nothing but air. The oculus, or eyehole, is 27 feet in diameter, and made up of 4.5 foot thick ring of bricks. The ring acts exactly like an arch, except that its ends are joined together. Compressive forces are redirected along the ring’s body. The only difference between the ring and the arch is that the compression forces come from all directions. These forces wedge the ring stones tightly together. The compression forces cancel each other out and the top of the dome is left in a state of horizontal equilibrium. The oculus was only reinforced by a row of bricks and bronze- framed. THE OCULUS NET COMPRESSION FORCE = -0 N Centering was not required for the lower third of the dome, so the Romans used a lighter centring system supported from the dome’s interior, second cornice line. compression tension 51.82° CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 16
  • 19. INNER DOME – COFFERING Scaffolding Coffer Mold Coffer molds were installed and the concrete was poured in section. There are five rows of coffer and each ring is smaller than the one beneath it. Workers assembled each row of coffers separately using scaffolding as shown in figure 1. While waiting for the row of concrete to harden, they moved on to another. KEEPING THE DOME IN PLACE The huge and heavy dome is kept in place because of the coffering inner dome. Recent engineering studies have shown each coffer only reduce 5% of weight. 5% of a dome that weight 5,000 tons(227,000 kilogram) is a lot. Rows of coffering also form ribs acting as stiffening element form preventing the dome form deflecting. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 17COFFERS
  • 20. Construction Method The inner dome Rotunda wall outward forces Downwards forces Because is a dome surface structure, its weight naturally go outward as well as downward. The weight pushing outward is called hoop stress. This hoop stress had been solved by starting the inner dome (coffer)inside the rotunda wall. The rotunda wall is higher than the inside dome and act as shoulder to hold the dome inwards. Therefore, from the outside the starting of the dome cannot really be determined. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS COFFERS 18
  • 21. Construction Method Top row of coffer contain 3 recesses The rest of the row of coffers have 4 recesses The space between the top and the bottoms of the coffer remains constant, while the space between the side of each coffer diminish as they proceed up the dome, much like the line of latitude and longitude of a globe. Forces is that distributed evenly throughout the surface is then breaking down into smaller forces in the recesses. Thus less down the forces carried by the whole dome. Coffer Design CONSTRUCTION DETAILS COFFERS 19
  • 22. Construction Method Coffer Design The effect of the dome is spectacular, it was a surprise when one entered the rotunda. Ones eyes are carried up to the oculus which lets in enough light to make the whole area seem light and airy. The coffers gives the effect of producing the magnitude of light and darks in the dome, constantly changing as the beam of light and its projected circle from the oculus moved with the sun. This gives one the impression that the building is dynamic and not solid and weighty, but light, airy and uplifting, like the sky outside on a clear day. The dome seemed to expand as one looks at it. Shadow Light CONSTRUCTION DETAILS COFFERS 20
  • 23. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS TENSION FORCES NORMAL FORCE OF THE ADDED CONCRETE IN THE STEPPED RINGS, ACTING AGAINST THE INTERNAL THRUST OF THE DOME WEIGHT OF THE DOME HALF SECTION/ ELEVATION OF MAIN STRUCTURE STEPPED RINGS THE RINGS REDIRECT THE TENSION FORCES TO THE WALL BELOW On the outside surface of the pantheon Dome, there is a series of seven step- rings half way up the dome, and then the dome line changes into a circular line. There is 7 rings stacked on top of each other, and non uniform in diamter. The rings have its outside edge resting on the center of the ring below. It appears to be some 7.5 feet (2.3 m) thick with a horizontal distance to the next ring about this same distance. The remaining 6 step-rings are stepped inward much like placing a series of machine washers, one above the other with their diameters decreasing as they are stacked. The height of these 6 rings vary, and they are estimated to be 2'- 6" (0.8 m) on the average. The horizontal distance to the next of these smaller rings is estimated to be 4 feet (1.2 m). There is an exterior stairway leading through these rings to the oculus. STEPPED RINGS OF THE DOME 21
  • 24. STACK CONCEPT OF RINGS each ring is stacked on top of each other, the end of the upper ring starts at the centre of the ring below allowing the weight to be uniformly distributed across the concrete and eventually down to the wall below. The diameter of the rings decrease as they are stacked. THE CONCRETE IS REINFORCED WITH LEAD PLATES ON EACH STEPPING LEAD PLATES Conclusion: elimination of the stepped rings would cause the dome to be pushed outwards beyond the thrust line, and result in cracking of the dome, and possible Structure collapsing. Exterior stairway leading to the oculus Weight of ( dome + subsequent upper rings ) oculus CONSTRUCTION DETAILS STEPPED RINGS OF THE DOME 22
  • 25. FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS) A column is an upright beam and a linear element- the bearing capacity is mainly provided by bending moment action, that is the couple produced by the tensile and compressive stresses at opposite edges of the same section of the beam multiplied by the moment arm/ distance measured between the point where forces are applied and the point that is pinned. Columns in the Pantheon is mostly located at the portico, which consists of 16 towering columns that were conducted with Egyptian granite, porphyry and white marble bases. Standing at 39 feet (11.8 meters) tall and five feet (1.5 meters) in diameter, each column weighs about 60 tons and supports additional loading from the roof structure above. Inside, you will see a series of many more columns in colors of red, grey, and crème in various sizes and designs. CORINTHIAN ORDER The Corinthian order is the most decorative of the three styles of columns. Corinthian also uses the method of entasis to make the shafts appear straight to the human eye. The Corinthian capitals have flowers and leaves below a small scroll that connect to the shaft and end on a circular or square platform that is the base. All columns of the Pantheon are of this style. Positions of the 16 columns (red) in the portico 23
  • 26. Columns can support a roof or a beam or they can be purely decorative. In the case of the Pantheon, most columns are used to create a load path for forces created by the weight of materials used on roof to the foundation in the ground. A strong construction stone, the granite within the columns of the pantheon has a compressive strength of 19000 psi. The travel of compressing forces from the roof towards the foundation FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS) 24
  • 27. An arch is a structure that is usually made of stone, brick, concrete, or steel. (Figure 13.) Featuring curved contour, it is design to support or strengthen a structural design via its ability to distribute load. As in most curved elements, the couple produced by the internal stresses associated with the horizontal boundary reaction creates the bearing capacity in an arch. The arch can be classified as a construction technique where the elements of the structure themselves are in compression instead of tension in the material; thrust instead of pull at the abutments. Most arches are built of wedge- shaped blocks- the top center stone is known as the keystone and is the final block to be inserted when assembling an arch. During construction, wooden scaffolding often supports arches prior to the removal of the frame. The finished product results in two arms of masonry arches press against a keystone to create a stable structure in which the moment produced by the two arms of masonry are canceled out. Arches on the rotunda wall visible on the exterior walls FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS) 25
  • 28. The structure of the Pantheon is comprised of a series of intersecting arches. The arches rest on eight piers which support eight round-headed arches which run through the drum from its inner to its outer face. The arches correspond to the eight bays on the floor level that house statues. The dome itself is supported by a series of arches that run horizontally round. In other words, relieving arches direct the loads to the thicker parts of the wall between the niches. They provide a structural component to the wall that helps prevent excessive creep or settlement in any one place within the wall. Note that the distinguishable characteristics of concrete, ancient or modern, are that it gains strength slowly over a period of time and that it is susceptible to the phenomenon known as creep, which is the slow deformation of the material over time. Drawing of structural system of arches/ribs in rotunda wall. FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR (COLUMNS) 26
  • 29. Pantheon Modeling Process Model Making ProcessMODEL MAKING PROCESS 27
  • 30. THE MASS 1.First, we built a base of the pantheon which includes layers of steps. Then lift up to certain dimension to build the rotunda wall according to the plan drawings. (Refer to figure 1. 2. 3.) 2.Columns of the front façade is made and try to join with the rotunda wall. (Refer to figure 4. 5. 6. ) 3.2.1. 4. 5. 6. MODEL MAKING PROCESS 28
  • 31. THE OUTER LAYER OF DOME (refer to figure 7. 8. 9. ) The outer layer of dome is calculated to gain the dimension to cut in balsa. 8. 9.7. 11. 12.10. ( refer to figure 10. 11. 12. ) Calculated and cut pieces are dipped into the hot water then bend to an ideal curve. It is then dried by hair dryer. MODEL MAKING PROCESS 29
  • 32. THE INNER LAYER OF DOME - COFFERING (refer to figure 13. 14. 15. ) The coffers are cut differently according to layer. After that is dipped in hot water to be ready for the bending session later. 13. 14. 15. ( refer to figure 16. 17. ) Dipped coffers pieces are bend using masking tape and dry it until achieved certain curve. 16. 17. MODEL MAKING PROCESS 30
  • 33. 18. 19. 20. (refer to figure 18. 19. 20. ) Layers of coffers pieces are attached to the rotunda wall, one layer stacking on another layer to bring out the depth of the coffers like in the pantheon itself. MODEL MAKING PROCESS 31
  • 34. Model Making Process THE DETAIL STRUCTURE ( COFFER) 21. 22. 23. (refer to figure 21.22.23) In order to achieve layers of coffers, clay are used and squares in different dimension are formed. Squares are attached to each other followed by dimension. Lastly, the outer surface is made to cover up the coffers. 24. 25. 26. (refer to figure 24.25.26) The details of the coffer is done with the grid bar representing the force distribution inwards each recesses. MODEL MAKING PROCESS 32
  • 35. Model Making Process Final product Front view of the model Side view of the model MODEL MAKING PROCESS 33
  • 36. Model Making Process DIFFICULTIES & SOLUTION IN MODELLING 1) Inaccuracy of dimension Zero error happened all the time during the cutting. Therefore, it ended up resulting in different heights of the columns. Some of them might not be able to touch the ground. Therefore, things need to be cut precisely and measured accurately beforehand. 2) Dome dimension Making dome is the hardest part in modelling Pantheon. As it involves a lot of calculation in order to make the dome by pieces of balsa wood. Making the curve into 2d and get its dimension. We divided the dome curve into 14 pieces of balsa wood to enhance the curve effect. However, some of them might not be joined perfectly and therefore left a gap in between. Problem are solved by bending every pieces into same curve to reduce down the gap . 3) Fragility of Balsa Pantheon building might need a lot of bending. (the rotunda wall and the dome). Some pieces was broken and was hard to form certain curve that we wanted. Problem is solved by increasing the temperature of the hot water that dipped in and increase the time of dipping. MODEL MAKING PROCESS 34
  • 37. the Pantheon represents the highest achievement of Roman architecture, both formally and structurally. It combines boldness, scale, and mastery of every architectural art. For whatever the reason, the Pantheon is the only structure of its age, size and span that has successfully survived the scourge of time and gravity and has remained pristine in splendor and beauty. While the Pantheon may be divinely protected, there are more earthbound reasons for its survival as well. We can attribute its longetivity to the quality of materials used. Perhaps it is because of very strong concrete with pozzolona cement that we are able to too can marvel at the wonder that Michelangelo once described to look more like the work of angels, not humans. The whole combination of dome was one of the greatest creations the Roman ever did. Every part of the dome is needed to support each other. Besides, the detailing is even existed not only for aesthetic purpose but also functionally, to distribute forces to their respective parts. The wisdom of reducing the thickness of the dome and at last to be able to leave a hole(oculus) had made Pantheon remain amazing and respected by the modern generations. For whatever the reason, the Pantheon is the only structure of its age, size and span that has successfully survived the scourge of time and gravity and has remained pristine in splendor and beauty. CONCLUSION 35
  • 38. 1. http://www.generativeart.com/salgado/salgado.htm 2. http://harvey.ro/THE_DOME_OF_THE_PANTHEON.html 3. http://www.generativeart.com/salgado/salgado.htm 4. http://www.romanconcrete.com/docs/chapt01/chapt01.htm 5. http://architecturerevived.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-pantheon-romes-architecture- of.html REFERENCES 36