SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 33
A claim persuades, argues,
convinces, proves, or provocatively
suggests something to a reader who
may or may not initially agree with
you.
What most non-academics mean by argument is usually a
polar opposition or heated debate: I win/you lose; you‟re a
Democrat/I‟m a Republican; I‟m for the death
penalty/you‟re a bleeding-heart liberal against the death
penalty; I‟m pro-choice/you‟re against choice. Though
academic arguments can be just as heated and draw on
political, social, cultural, or personal positions and
experiences, academic claims are different—often more
complex, nuanced, specific, and detailed. Most academic
argument is bounded by what is considered debatable or up
for inquiry within a discipline, acknowledging that some
questions are already settled (though that too may end up
being debatable).
The „rules‟ of academic argument exclude the
following as support:
—Because it is my personal opinion
—Because my friends or relatives think so or
most people think so
—Because it‟s always been, it‟s tradition
—Because it‟s obvious
—Because it‟s morally right
A claim is the main argument of an essay. It is
probably the single most important part of an
academic paper. The complexity, effectiveness, and
quality of the entire paper hinges on the claim. If
your claim is boring or obvious, the rest of the paper
probably will be too.
A claim defines your paper‟s goals, direction, scope,
and exigence and is supported by evidence,
quotations, argumentation, expert opinion, statistics,
and telling details.
A claim must be argumentative. When you make a
claim, you are arguing for a certain interpretation
or understanding of your subject.
A good claim is specific. It makes a focused
argument (MTV‟s popularity is waning because it
no longer plays music videos) rather than a general
one (MTV sucks).
Following are examples of descriptive thesis
statements students write in high school. Each is
drawn from the top-scoring AP English Language
and Composition papers posted on the College
Board website:
“To be a writer, one must have an elite
understanding of diction, syntax and tone. These
literary devices are utilized by writers, including
Eudora Welty, as a method for expressing the
message that they wish to convey to readers.”
“In the excerpt from One Writer‟s Beginnings,
Eudora Welty conveys a positive tone toward her
childhood experience. She accomplishes this
through the use of descriptive diction,
impressionable images, and unusual syntax.”
“The two passages given describe the swamp in
very different lights. Although they are in some
ways familiar, the styles of the authors of these
paragraphs are very different.”
These are NOT argumentative claims because the
writers‟ strategy here is to create a thesis
statement that is DESCRIPTIVE. The writer is
describing some aspect of the main text, and that‟s
all their doing. It‟s like saying, “Shakespeare‟s
Romeo and Juliet is a play about two star crossed
lovers and two warring families.”
Descriptive theses do not investigate anything,
critique anything, or analyze anything. Descriptive
claims also do not invite support and argument
from outside of the central text nor do descriptive
papers apply what has been learned in the central
text to other texts.
Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
Twinkies are delicious. Twinkies taste better than
other snack cakes because
of their texture, their
creamy filling, and their
golden appearance.
Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
I like dance music. Dance music has become
popular for reasons that
have nothing to do with the
quality of the
music;rather, the clear, fast
beats respond to the need of
people on amphetamines to
move, and to move quickly.
Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
I think Virginia Woolf is
better than James Joyce.
Virginia Woolf is a more
effective writer than James
Joyce because she does not
rely on elaborate
language devices that
ultimately confuse and
alienate the reader.
Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim
The governor is a bad man. The governor has
continually done the
community a disservice by
mishandling money,
focusing on frivolous causes,
and failing to listen to his
constituents.
—An argument is supported by evidence, which
can be debated/challenged. Opinion is
supported by more opinion (and ultimately you end
up with something along the lines of “Well, just
because, okay?”).
—A claim can be substantiated with research,
evidence, testimony, and academic reasoning.
—A claim is something more than statement and
support: an arguable claim also goes on to
address the “so what?” question, the implications
and why we should care in the first place.
—Remember that not all claims are created equal,
and though a claim may be arguable, the best
claims are focused, specific, complex, and relevant.
In arguing a claim, you should always consider
potential counterclaims and counterarguments.
For instance, in response to the above claim about
the Seahawks, someone might say: “You‟re wrong.
The Hawks defensive problems last year were a
result of poor coaching on the part of the defensive
coordinator.” This counterclaim denies the validity
of my claim. Usually, it‟s important to address
counterclaims in your writing.
Did it happen? Is it true? Does it exist?
Claims of fact appear to be statements of
fact, but remember that your claim needs to
be argumentative, so you want to make a
claim about which not everyone would
agree. Some claims of fact are not arguable
(e.g. The earth orbits the sun).
Consider what it is that makes the following
claims arguable:
 NASA and the US government have spent more than
30 billion dollars to fake the Apollo moon landings
and to perpetuate this hoax.
(A claim of fact made by Bill Kaysing in his self-
published We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty
Billion Dollar Swindle)
A digital divide (inequitable access to technology)
between students from wealthier school districts
and students from poorer ones has added to the
problem of educational success among students
from the lower socioeconomic classes and students
from ethnic minorities.
Categorical Arguments: is X a Y?—where you and your
audience agree on the meaning of Y
Example: Frying or baking starchy foods can create high
levels of a potentially cancer-causing chemical called
acrylamide, so those French fries that you had at lunch today
(X) may be carcinogenic (Y).
Explanation: When you make a categorical claim, it’s
important that the majority of your audience agrees on the
meaning of the category. In the example above, the meaning
of the category (Y) should be easily agreed upon by most; a
carcinogen is something that causes cancer. Whether or not a
specific item (starchy foods; X) belongs in that category,
however, is open for debate.
What is it? (Is X a Y?, where the meaning of Y is
contested)
Unlike a categorical claim, in a true claim of
definition, the arguer can assume that the audience
agrees on the meaning of a term (X) that is being
placed into a certain category (Y), but it is the
definition of the category (Y) that is controversial or
arguable.
Example: Zygotes and embryos are human beings.
Explanation: The definition of a zygote (a diploid cell
resulting from the fusion of two haploid gametes; a fertilized
ovum) has been vastly agreed upon by members of the
community of biological scientists. Unless you’re a biological
scientist, making claims of definition about the meaning of
the terms zygote or embryo are not good choices for
argumentative topics.
The definition that is being called into question in the
example above is the meaning (definition) of the term
“human being” or the meaning of the concept of “life.”
Rather than requiring the author to make a scientific
judgment, defining the meaning of the term human or
the concept of life is more of a moral or philosophical
question—one that is much better suited to a college-
freshman-level composition assignment. (Please note:
this example came from an argument about embryonic
stemcell research rather than the overly common topic
of abortion about which so many college freshmen are
fond of writing and so many college writing teachers are
tired of reading.)
What caused it?
Is there a disagreement about a cause related to
your issue? Claims of cause seek to argue a cause
and effect relationship. Again, remember that
your claim needs to be arguable. Making a claim
that cigarette smoking often leads to lung cancer
is a causal claim, but not really an arguable one
by today’s standards. Consider the following
examples of causal claims that are still (at least
somewhat) debated.
Example: The widespread prescription of
antidepressants is directly responsible for an
increase in teen suicide rates.
Example: The popularity of Barbie among grade-
school-aged girls has contributed to the unrealistic
standards for beauty and thinness among teen girls
and young women.
How is it like something else?
Compare your topic to something that you believe your
audience will relate to easily as a way for your
audience to better understand your argument. It’s
often a successful strategy to argue that a truth about
something that so closely resembles your topic must
also be true for your topic. Resemblance arguments
are most often developed as a sub-claim that supports
the overall claim or thesis of an argument. At times,
however, one might choose to develop a resemblance
claim as the primary claim or thesis of an argument.
Example: As one admires the complex purpose, parts,
and motion of a wristwatch, knowing that it is the
watchmaker who is responsible for its design, so too we
should, when admiring the vastly more complex
purpose, parts, and motion of the universe, understand
that it too has an intelligent maker. (a paraphrase of
William Paley’s argument for intelligent design, 1802)
Is it good or bad?
Making a claim of value requires that
you evaluate your topic or an aspect of
your topic. Is it good or bad?
valuable or not valuable? desirable or
undesirable? and, of course, why?
Example: Global warming is the most pressing challenge
facing the world today.
Example: The right to bear arms in the US is an
important one.
Example: Physician assisted suicide is immoral.
What should we do about it?
Claims of policy suggest a solution to a
problem that has been defined or
described by an argument.
Example: Increased tax dollars for education of
prisoners will result in a decrease in the number of
released prisoners who re-offend.
Example: The sale of assault weapons should be
banned in the U.S.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Analyzing and evaluating arguments
Analyzing and evaluating argumentsAnalyzing and evaluating arguments
Analyzing and evaluating arguments
Ashley Troxell
 
Parts of an Argument
Parts of an ArgumentParts of an Argument
Parts of an Argument
sallison
 
Thesis Statement
Thesis StatementThesis Statement
Thesis Statement
Mrs_Bishoff
 
Argumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay pptArgumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay ppt
Hank Maine
 
Narrative Powerpoint
Narrative PowerpointNarrative Powerpoint
Narrative Powerpoint
mrswjohnston
 

Mais procurados (20)

Argumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay pptArgumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay ppt
 
Writing an effective conclusion
Writing an effective conclusionWriting an effective conclusion
Writing an effective conclusion
 
Coherence and unity writing
Coherence and unity writingCoherence and unity writing
Coherence and unity writing
 
Expository Essay PowerPoint_russellrodrigo
Expository Essay PowerPoint_russellrodrigoExpository Essay PowerPoint_russellrodrigo
Expository Essay PowerPoint_russellrodrigo
 
Analyzing and evaluating arguments
Analyzing and evaluating argumentsAnalyzing and evaluating arguments
Analyzing and evaluating arguments
 
Argumentative Essay
Argumentative EssayArgumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
 
Parts of an Argument
Parts of an ArgumentParts of an Argument
Parts of an Argument
 
Problem Solution Essay
Problem Solution EssayProblem Solution Essay
Problem Solution Essay
 
Writing Reviews
Writing ReviewsWriting Reviews
Writing Reviews
 
Argumentative essay
Argumentative essayArgumentative essay
Argumentative essay
 
Essay writing steps
Essay  writing stepsEssay  writing steps
Essay writing steps
 
Academic Writing
Academic WritingAcademic Writing
Academic Writing
 
Toulmin Model & Syllogisms
Toulmin Model & SyllogismsToulmin Model & Syllogisms
Toulmin Model & Syllogisms
 
Thesis Statement
Thesis StatementThesis Statement
Thesis Statement
 
Writing an Argumentative Essay
Writing an Argumentative EssayWriting an Argumentative Essay
Writing an Argumentative Essay
 
Thesis statement.ppt
Thesis statement.pptThesis statement.ppt
Thesis statement.ppt
 
Argumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay pptArgumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay ppt
 
Narrative Powerpoint
Narrative PowerpointNarrative Powerpoint
Narrative Powerpoint
 
Argumentative essay
Argumentative essayArgumentative essay
Argumentative essay
 
Properties of a well written text
Properties of a well written textProperties of a well written text
Properties of a well written text
 

Semelhante a CLAIMS-CLAIMS-CLAIMS.pptx

Page 1 of 4 Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docx
Page 1 of 4  Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docxPage 1 of 4  Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docx
Page 1 of 4 Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docx
bunyansaturnina
 
Introduction to argument elements
Introduction to argument elementsIntroduction to argument elements
Introduction to argument elements
Enoch Chow
 
How to write a thesis statment
How to write a thesis statmentHow to write a thesis statment
How to write a thesis statment
debbiewomble
 
Logical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsff
Logical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsffLogical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsff
Logical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsff
FredRyanDeano1
 
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to de
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to deDEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to de
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to de
LinaCovington707
 
1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx
 1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx 1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx
1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx
aryan532920
 
Research Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ou
Research Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ouResearch Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ou
Research Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ou
myrljjcpoarch
 
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docxIn this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
migdalialyle
 

Semelhante a CLAIMS-CLAIMS-CLAIMS.pptx (20)

Page 1 of 4 Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docx
Page 1 of 4  Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docxPage 1 of 4  Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docx
Page 1 of 4 Courtesy the Odegaard Writing & Research Ce.docx
 
Introduction to argument elements
Introduction to argument elements Introduction to argument elements
Introduction to argument elements
 
Introduction to argument elements
Introduction to argument elementsIntroduction to argument elements
Introduction to argument elements
 
How to write a thesis statment
How to write a thesis statmentHow to write a thesis statment
How to write a thesis statment
 
Logical fallacies
Logical fallaciesLogical fallacies
Logical fallacies
 
Logical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsff
Logical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsffLogical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsff
Logical Fallacies discussion svsdgdsgdsff
 
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to de
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to deDEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to de
DEVELOPING A WORKING THESIS FOUR MODELSWhat are some ways to de
 
1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx
 1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx 1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx
1 Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic b.docx
 
Senior High School Reading and Writing SKills
Senior High School Reading and Writing SKillsSenior High School Reading and Writing SKills
Senior High School Reading and Writing SKills
 
Claims 5 types Abridged.ppt
Claims 5 types Abridged.pptClaims 5 types Abridged.ppt
Claims 5 types Abridged.ppt
 
The persuasive speech
The persuasive speechThe persuasive speech
The persuasive speech
 
Argument Essay Samples
Argument Essay SamplesArgument Essay Samples
Argument Essay Samples
 
Senior High School Reading and Writing SKills
Senior High School Reading and Writing SKillsSenior High School Reading and Writing SKills
Senior High School Reading and Writing SKills
 
Research Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ou
Research Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ouResearch Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ou
Research Paper---A Clear Line of ReasoningHere is a model ou
 
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docxIn this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
 
Applying Toulmin Teaching Logical Reasoning And Argumentative Writing
Applying Toulmin  Teaching Logical Reasoning And Argumentative WritingApplying Toulmin  Teaching Logical Reasoning And Argumentative Writing
Applying Toulmin Teaching Logical Reasoning And Argumentative Writing
 
Senior High School Reading and Writing Skills
Senior High School Reading and Writing SkillsSenior High School Reading and Writing Skills
Senior High School Reading and Writing Skills
 
Writing to make a difference- while staying out of trouble
Writing to make a difference- while staying out of troubleWriting to make a difference- while staying out of trouble
Writing to make a difference- while staying out of trouble
 
Argumentative Writing
Argumentative WritingArgumentative Writing
Argumentative Writing
 
Senior High School Reading and Writing Skills
Senior High School Reading and Writing SkillsSenior High School Reading and Writing Skills
Senior High School Reading and Writing Skills
 

Mais de JessaDucay2 (14)

Oral Communication in Context .pptx
Oral Communication in Context      .pptxOral Communication in Context      .pptx
Oral Communication in Context .pptx
 
Science 8 - Chemistry - Matter .pptx
Science 8 - Chemistry - Matter     .pptxScience 8 - Chemistry - Matter     .pptx
Science 8 - Chemistry - Matter .pptx
 
intercultural-communication.ppt
intercultural-communication.pptintercultural-communication.ppt
intercultural-communication.ppt
 
SUMMATIVE TEST.pptx
SUMMATIVE TEST.pptxSUMMATIVE TEST.pptx
SUMMATIVE TEST.pptx
 
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT.pptx
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT.pptxEXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT.pptx
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT.pptx
 
CLASSIFICATION OF HOTELS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF HOTELS.pptxCLASSIFICATION OF HOTELS.pptx
CLASSIFICATION OF HOTELS.pptx
 
ARTICLE CRITIQUE.pptx
ARTICLE CRITIQUE.pptxARTICLE CRITIQUE.pptx
ARTICLE CRITIQUE.pptx
 
8writingareactionpaperorreview-190109172309.pptx
8writingareactionpaperorreview-190109172309.pptx8writingareactionpaperorreview-190109172309.pptx
8writingareactionpaperorreview-190109172309.pptx
 
elementsofdramapresentasi-161015113449.pptx
elementsofdramapresentasi-161015113449.pptxelementsofdramapresentasi-161015113449.pptx
elementsofdramapresentasi-161015113449.pptx
 
Elements Of DramaEDI.ppt
Elements Of DramaEDI.pptElements Of DramaEDI.ppt
Elements Of DramaEDI.ppt
 
Stress Management2.ppt
Stress Management2.pptStress Management2.ppt
Stress Management2.ppt
 
Text Structure PowerPoint.ppt
Text Structure PowerPoint.pptText Structure PowerPoint.ppt
Text Structure PowerPoint.ppt
 
text-structure.ppt
text-structure.ppttext-structure.ppt
text-structure.ppt
 
RPMS in the New Normal.pptx
RPMS in the New Normal.pptxRPMS in the New Normal.pptx
RPMS in the New Normal.pptx
 

Último

An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
SanaAli374401
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
MateoGardella
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 

Último (20)

An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 

CLAIMS-CLAIMS-CLAIMS.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2. A claim persuades, argues, convinces, proves, or provocatively suggests something to a reader who may or may not initially agree with you.
  • 3. What most non-academics mean by argument is usually a polar opposition or heated debate: I win/you lose; you‟re a Democrat/I‟m a Republican; I‟m for the death penalty/you‟re a bleeding-heart liberal against the death penalty; I‟m pro-choice/you‟re against choice. Though academic arguments can be just as heated and draw on political, social, cultural, or personal positions and experiences, academic claims are different—often more complex, nuanced, specific, and detailed. Most academic argument is bounded by what is considered debatable or up for inquiry within a discipline, acknowledging that some questions are already settled (though that too may end up being debatable).
  • 4. The „rules‟ of academic argument exclude the following as support: —Because it is my personal opinion —Because my friends or relatives think so or most people think so —Because it‟s always been, it‟s tradition —Because it‟s obvious —Because it‟s morally right
  • 5. A claim is the main argument of an essay. It is probably the single most important part of an academic paper. The complexity, effectiveness, and quality of the entire paper hinges on the claim. If your claim is boring or obvious, the rest of the paper probably will be too. A claim defines your paper‟s goals, direction, scope, and exigence and is supported by evidence, quotations, argumentation, expert opinion, statistics, and telling details.
  • 6. A claim must be argumentative. When you make a claim, you are arguing for a certain interpretation or understanding of your subject. A good claim is specific. It makes a focused argument (MTV‟s popularity is waning because it no longer plays music videos) rather than a general one (MTV sucks).
  • 7. Following are examples of descriptive thesis statements students write in high school. Each is drawn from the top-scoring AP English Language and Composition papers posted on the College Board website:
  • 8. “To be a writer, one must have an elite understanding of diction, syntax and tone. These literary devices are utilized by writers, including Eudora Welty, as a method for expressing the message that they wish to convey to readers.” “In the excerpt from One Writer‟s Beginnings, Eudora Welty conveys a positive tone toward her childhood experience. She accomplishes this through the use of descriptive diction, impressionable images, and unusual syntax.”
  • 9. “The two passages given describe the swamp in very different lights. Although they are in some ways familiar, the styles of the authors of these paragraphs are very different.” These are NOT argumentative claims because the writers‟ strategy here is to create a thesis statement that is DESCRIPTIVE. The writer is describing some aspect of the main text, and that‟s all their doing. It‟s like saying, “Shakespeare‟s Romeo and Juliet is a play about two star crossed lovers and two warring families.”
  • 10. Descriptive theses do not investigate anything, critique anything, or analyze anything. Descriptive claims also do not invite support and argument from outside of the central text nor do descriptive papers apply what has been learned in the central text to other texts.
  • 11. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim Twinkies are delicious. Twinkies taste better than other snack cakes because of their texture, their creamy filling, and their golden appearance.
  • 12. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim I like dance music. Dance music has become popular for reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of the music;rather, the clear, fast beats respond to the need of people on amphetamines to move, and to move quickly.
  • 13. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim I think Virginia Woolf is better than James Joyce. Virginia Woolf is a more effective writer than James Joyce because she does not rely on elaborate language devices that ultimately confuse and alienate the reader.
  • 14. Opinion Argument/Arguable Claim The governor is a bad man. The governor has continually done the community a disservice by mishandling money, focusing on frivolous causes, and failing to listen to his constituents.
  • 15. —An argument is supported by evidence, which can be debated/challenged. Opinion is supported by more opinion (and ultimately you end up with something along the lines of “Well, just because, okay?”). —A claim can be substantiated with research, evidence, testimony, and academic reasoning.
  • 16. —A claim is something more than statement and support: an arguable claim also goes on to address the “so what?” question, the implications and why we should care in the first place. —Remember that not all claims are created equal, and though a claim may be arguable, the best claims are focused, specific, complex, and relevant.
  • 17. In arguing a claim, you should always consider potential counterclaims and counterarguments. For instance, in response to the above claim about the Seahawks, someone might say: “You‟re wrong. The Hawks defensive problems last year were a result of poor coaching on the part of the defensive coordinator.” This counterclaim denies the validity of my claim. Usually, it‟s important to address counterclaims in your writing.
  • 18.
  • 19. Did it happen? Is it true? Does it exist? Claims of fact appear to be statements of fact, but remember that your claim needs to be argumentative, so you want to make a claim about which not everyone would agree. Some claims of fact are not arguable (e.g. The earth orbits the sun).
  • 20. Consider what it is that makes the following claims arguable:  NASA and the US government have spent more than 30 billion dollars to fake the Apollo moon landings and to perpetuate this hoax. (A claim of fact made by Bill Kaysing in his self- published We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle)
  • 21. A digital divide (inequitable access to technology) between students from wealthier school districts and students from poorer ones has added to the problem of educational success among students from the lower socioeconomic classes and students from ethnic minorities.
  • 22. Categorical Arguments: is X a Y?—where you and your audience agree on the meaning of Y Example: Frying or baking starchy foods can create high levels of a potentially cancer-causing chemical called acrylamide, so those French fries that you had at lunch today (X) may be carcinogenic (Y). Explanation: When you make a categorical claim, it’s important that the majority of your audience agrees on the meaning of the category. In the example above, the meaning of the category (Y) should be easily agreed upon by most; a carcinogen is something that causes cancer. Whether or not a specific item (starchy foods; X) belongs in that category, however, is open for debate.
  • 23. What is it? (Is X a Y?, where the meaning of Y is contested) Unlike a categorical claim, in a true claim of definition, the arguer can assume that the audience agrees on the meaning of a term (X) that is being placed into a certain category (Y), but it is the definition of the category (Y) that is controversial or arguable.
  • 24. Example: Zygotes and embryos are human beings. Explanation: The definition of a zygote (a diploid cell resulting from the fusion of two haploid gametes; a fertilized ovum) has been vastly agreed upon by members of the community of biological scientists. Unless you’re a biological scientist, making claims of definition about the meaning of the terms zygote or embryo are not good choices for argumentative topics.
  • 25. The definition that is being called into question in the example above is the meaning (definition) of the term “human being” or the meaning of the concept of “life.” Rather than requiring the author to make a scientific judgment, defining the meaning of the term human or the concept of life is more of a moral or philosophical question—one that is much better suited to a college- freshman-level composition assignment. (Please note: this example came from an argument about embryonic stemcell research rather than the overly common topic of abortion about which so many college freshmen are fond of writing and so many college writing teachers are tired of reading.)
  • 26. What caused it? Is there a disagreement about a cause related to your issue? Claims of cause seek to argue a cause and effect relationship. Again, remember that your claim needs to be arguable. Making a claim that cigarette smoking often leads to lung cancer is a causal claim, but not really an arguable one by today’s standards. Consider the following examples of causal claims that are still (at least somewhat) debated.
  • 27. Example: The widespread prescription of antidepressants is directly responsible for an increase in teen suicide rates. Example: The popularity of Barbie among grade- school-aged girls has contributed to the unrealistic standards for beauty and thinness among teen girls and young women.
  • 28. How is it like something else? Compare your topic to something that you believe your audience will relate to easily as a way for your audience to better understand your argument. It’s often a successful strategy to argue that a truth about something that so closely resembles your topic must also be true for your topic. Resemblance arguments are most often developed as a sub-claim that supports the overall claim or thesis of an argument. At times, however, one might choose to develop a resemblance claim as the primary claim or thesis of an argument.
  • 29. Example: As one admires the complex purpose, parts, and motion of a wristwatch, knowing that it is the watchmaker who is responsible for its design, so too we should, when admiring the vastly more complex purpose, parts, and motion of the universe, understand that it too has an intelligent maker. (a paraphrase of William Paley’s argument for intelligent design, 1802)
  • 30. Is it good or bad? Making a claim of value requires that you evaluate your topic or an aspect of your topic. Is it good or bad? valuable or not valuable? desirable or undesirable? and, of course, why?
  • 31. Example: Global warming is the most pressing challenge facing the world today. Example: The right to bear arms in the US is an important one. Example: Physician assisted suicide is immoral.
  • 32. What should we do about it? Claims of policy suggest a solution to a problem that has been defined or described by an argument.
  • 33. Example: Increased tax dollars for education of prisoners will result in a decrease in the number of released prisoners who re-offend. Example: The sale of assault weapons should be banned in the U.S.