Navi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Psychophysiological aspects of Human-System Integration i C4 and operation safety
1. „Psychofizjologiczne problemy integracji
człowieka z systemami:
łączności, sterowania i dowodzenia a
bezpieczeostwo operacji”
• Jerzy Achimowicz, Olaf Truszczyoski, Grzegorz Nowicki
• Zakład Bezpieczeostwa Lotów i Klinika
• Wojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej
• Ul. Krasioskiego 54, 01-755 Warszawa,
6. KONFERENCJA URZĄDZENIA I SYSTEMY RADIOELEKTRONICZNE POD PATRONATEM
Komitetu Elektroniki i Telekomunikacji
Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Komitetu Narodowego Międzynarodowej Unii Nauk Radiowych
2. STRESZCZENIE
•
•
Autorzy pracy dokonują przeglądu aktualnych tendencji rozwojowych i problemów badawczych
pojawiających się na skutek szybkiego rozwoju autonomicznych systemów uzbrojenia takich jak bezzałogowe
pojazdy latające i naziemne oraz podwodne roboty pola walki.
•
Mimo powszechnej automatyzacji systemów sterowania systemami pozwalającymi na rozpoznanie pola walki,
prowadzenie działao bojowych oraz dowodzenie rożnymi rodzajami wojsk z zapewnieniem interoperacyjnosci w
systemie NATO, rola czynnika ludzkiego staje się coraz ważniejsza.
•
Z doświadczeo NASA w zakresie projektowania i realizacji złożonych misji/projektów takich jak np. nowy system
kontroli lotów lotnictwa cywilnego i wojskowego wynika ze można osiągnąd większe bezpieczeostwo operacji jeżeli
zmieni się tradycyjne podejście do integracji człowieka ze złożonymi systemami już na etapie ich projektowania. W
tzw. modelu HSI (Human-System Integration) człowieka nie traktuje się jako potencjalne źródło
problemów/błędów ale jako główny element systemu zapewniający jego niezawodnośd.
•
W związku z tym w procesie projektowania np. centrów dowodzenia misją uwzględnia aktualne osiągnięcia w
dziedzinie psychofizjologii przede wszystkim umożliwiające określenie zdolności poznawczych człowieka o raz ich
zwiększanie prowadzące do efektywnego podejmowania trafnych decyzji.
•
Powyższe podejście zostanie zilustrowane na przekładzie systemów selekcji i szkolenia operatorów dronów,
projektowania ich systemów pilotażu wykorzystujących takie techniki jak augmented cognition and reality raz
biofeedback AFTE ( Autogenic Feedback Traing Exercise) i BCI (Brain Computer Interface).
•
3.
4.
5. Human Systems Integration in
Maintenance
A technician performs
maintenance on a Space Shuttle
Main Engine (SSME) in building
3202 in preparation for a test
firing at the NASA Stennis Space
Center. (ca. 2002)
5
7. A View of the Human-Machine Interface
INTERPRETATION
SITUATION ASSESSMENT
DECISION MAKING
PERCEPTION
ACTION EXECUTION
SYTEM CONTROL
HMIs
RECEIVE INPUT
PROVIDE FEEDBACK TO USER
MACHINE OPERATIONS
7
Information Processing Model
Wickens 1992
8. Conceptual Shift
From Human –Machine Interface
• From humans as a source of error…
• To humans as a source of resilience
To a new paradighm – HSI
• (Human System Integration)
8
9. New approach: HSI and Automation
Human Systems Integration
• Iterative technology
requirements
• Resilience and error
implications
• Complex environment
• Task requirements
Automation and Computer
Science
10/31/2013
9
9
10. Adapted from HSI chart by
Based on DoD HSI Acquisition Approach
(e.g., Army’s MANPRINT)
Human-Systems Integration: Systems Engineering Motivation
Reduced
Maintainability
Reduced
Life-Cycle Cost
and
Improved Safety
and Mission
Success
Reduced Staff
Improved Human
Productivity and
System Performance
Fewer Errors
(Fewer Mishaps,
Reduced Scrap, Fewer Delays)
Together, these building blocks produce
Optimal* Human Performance
System and
Task Design
Human Capabilities
And Competencies
Human Workload
Fitness for Duty
Human-System
Interfaces
Adequate Knowledge,
Skills, and Abilities
Staffing
and Work Distribution
Human is Qualified,
Rested, Motivated,
and Healthy
Human
Factors
Engineering
Personnel
Selection
Training
Manpower
10
Human-Systems Integration
Personnel
Safety and
Survivability
Habitability
10
11. HSI Research Philosophy
Human Performance Model-Based
Requirements & Standards
Human Performance
Metrics & Models
Requirements/Needs
Technologies & Capabilities
System
Design
Generative Mechanisms of
Human Performance
11
11
13. Flight Deck Display Research Laboratory
General Research Focus
• Human-centered concepts of operation for the Next
Generation Air Transportation System automation that
promote
– Situation Awareness
– Transparent Automation
– Seamlessly Shared Authority
The major element of our work is the
Cockpit Situation Display
14. UAV Ground Station Interface
Advanced Flight Deck Interface
The Flight Deck Display Research Laboratory (FDDRL)
develops advanced display concepts and prototypes to
support the Next Generation Air Transportation System.
15. Cockpit Situation Display (CSD)
This presentation is a brief overview
of the CSD, a prototype display
developed by the FDDRL to support:
Integrated
Traffic Awareness
Terrain Awareness
Weather Awareness
Trajectory Management
Based upon availability of high quality information on traffic, weather and
terrain
15
16. Weather Display
Goal is to develop an intuitive 3D convective
weather display.
Today:
Classic Airborne Radar
2D – Storm tops not displayed, must use tilt
Range Limited – More tactical view
Immediate
NextRad
2D – Storm tops still not typically displayed
Range unlimited - Strategic
Updates every 5-10 min
Today/Tomorrow:
FAA is investing in “4D Weather Cube”
Range Unlimited - Stragetic
3D – Storm top information available
4D – Forecast information available
Updates every 1 min
16
17. Terrain Display
Goal is to develop a strategic
trajectory-based terrain hazard
display
• USGS SDTS DEM 30 meter Data
• 3D extruded terrain for low
altitude 3D viewing
• 2D projection for high altitude
3D viewing
• Trajectory based terrain
alerting
American Sierra Nevada range approach
Tahoe Nevada
17
20. • Tag Team Threat-recognition Technology
Incorporates Mind, Machine
• September 18, 2012
• DARPA links human brainwaves, improved
sensors, cognitive algorithms to improve target
detection
•
http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2012/09/18.aspx
Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/this-is-your-brain-onsilicon/#ixzz2hv529y8z
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook
21. BCI – Brain Computer Interface
Basically, a soldier wears an
electroencephalogram (EEG) cap that monitors
his brain signals as he watches the feed from a
120-megapixel, tripod-mounted, electro-optical
video camera with a 120-degree field of view.
(Translation: incredible detail in a huge range of
vision.)
24. 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Blood Volume Pulse left hand
Blood Volume Pulse right hand
Respiration Rate
AFTE
Heart Rate
Skin Conductance Level
Hand temperature
Blood flow – head
Blood flow – toe
EMG – left arm
EMG – right arm
EMG – left leg
EMG right leg
Systolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Mean Arterial Pressure
Thoracic Fluid Volume
Stroke Volume
Cardiac Output
Total Peripheral Resistance
Vagal Tone
Trainer Controls 20 Displays
26. BioHarness and Software
Measures
BioHarness
• Electrocardiography
• Respiration
• Chest Skin Temperature
• Posture
• Activity
• Acceleration (XYZ), minimum and peak
• Requires non-skin contact sensors
• Can interface with a PC or cell phone
• No sensors for skin conductance, hand
temperature, and blood flow, EMG
27. • Sustained Operations:
Fatigue, vigilance, sleep
loss, contribute to human
error accidents
A Autonomous Mode Behavior:
condition when a high state of physiological
arousal is accompanied by a narrowing of the
focus of attention
28. Performance x Phases of Flight
flight 1 (pre-training) vs flight 2 (post-training): AFTE
Performance Dimensions
Crew Coordination Planning and
and
Situational
Communication Awareness
Checklist execution
Stress Management
Aircraft Handling
*
Taxi/takeoff
Initial cruise
Touch & go
+
Cruise search &
rescue
Emergency initiation
*
Emergency return to
base
Emergency approach
& landing
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
flight 1 vs flight 2 for Controls were not significant, except a lower
score for touch and go (+) on flight 2
*
* p <0.05
29.
30.
31.
32. Future Applications of AFTE
Transfer NASA Technology and Validation Studies
•
•
•
•
Training of Polish Military Pilots
Training of U.S. Naval Pilots for Airsickness Mitigation
Training of U.S. Veterans as a Treatment for PostTraumatic Stress Syndrome
Training of Astronauts and Cosmonauts
Develop/ Test New Monitoring and Training Capabilities
•
Stream-line software
•
Neuro-feedback and autonomic coherence
•
Unobtrusive physiological Monitoring
33. Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation:
authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and
cooperative control situations
•
Übersicht
Flemisch, F.; Heesen, M.; Hesse, T.; Kelsch, J.; Schieben, A.; Beller, J.: Towards a dynamic balance between humans
and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control
situations, In: Cognition, Technology & Work (CTW), Springer, Berlin 2011, ISSN 1435-5558, S. 1-16 (online)
Kurzfassung
Progress enables the creation of more automated and intelligent machines with increasing abilities that open up
new roles between humans and machines. Only with a proper design for the resulting cooperative human–
machine systems, these advances will make our lives easier, safer and enjoyable rather than harder and miserable.
Starting from examples of natural cooperative systems, the paper investigates four cornerstone concepts for the
design of such systems: ability, authority, control and responsibility, as well as their relationship to each other and
to concepts like levels of automation and autonomy. Consistency in the relations between these concepts is
identified as an important quality for the system design. A simple graphical tool is introduced that can help to
visualize the cornerstone concepts and their relations in a single diagram. Examples from the automotive
domain, where a cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles is under
investigation, demonstrate the application of the concepts and the tool. Transitions in authority and control, e.g.
initiated by changes in the ability of human or machine, are identified as key challenges. A sufficient consistency
of the mental models of human and machines, not only in the system use but also in the design and
evaluation, can be a key enabler for a successful dynamic balance between humans and machines.
•
Schlagworte
Assistant systems, Automation, Human-machine cooperation, Adaptive
automation, Levels of automation, Balanced automation
Notas do Editor
NextGenComplex mixture of coevolving operational concepts (roles, responsibilities) for human participants (aircraft and UAV pilots, air traffic controllers, and automation)These concepts result in more responsibilities being distributed to the flight deck and to automation.Automation development often runs ahead – we must anticipate or at least keep up
The Flight Deck Display Research Laboratory (FDDRL), a part of the Human Systems Integration Division at the NASA Ames Research Center, develops and examines human-centered concepts that address projected changes in roles and responsibilities in the US Air Traffic Management System. As a part of this effort the FDDRL develops prototype display interfaces and, through empirical research (mainly large-scale distributed human-in-the-loop simulations), develops guidelines for the integration of flight deck displays, decision support tools, and automation.The lab's principal product is the Cockpit Situation Display (CSD). The CSD, designed around the lab’s advanced Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI), was originally built for, and incorporated into, the 2004 Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management (DAG-TM) simulations. In that project it served as the primary visual interface for both medium-fidelity single and multi-pilot simulators. It also served as the primary visual interface for the high-fidelity full-mission Advanced Concepts Flight Simulator at the Ames Crew Vehicle System Research Facility. Since its inception, many of the lab's part-task experiments have examined, or leveraged, CSD technologies. CSD stations have been deployed at several institutions throughout the country where they have been used collaboratively with the FDDRL to study significant human-in-the-loop (HITL) issues. The CSD has been designed to be easy to configure, allowing its various features and embedded tools to be selectively enabled or disabled. This, in turn, has made it an easily used research platform, and the basis for much experimentation and exploration. Within the FDDRL the CSD forms the basis for fast prototyping and subsequent HITL examination of near and far-term airspace concepts and flight deck procedures.
The CSD is designed to provide an integrated,but clutter resistant/tolerant 2D-4D visualization With a graphical user interface to the flight management systemthe display is based on a cylindrical container-like metaphor, and the flight crew can simply rotate this cylindrical space into various orientations for preferred viewing angles. Transitions (panning, zooming, etc) are morph-animated to maximize continuous orientation awareness. Weather objects and terrain features not only provide useful positional and hazard cues along a proposed route.
2D/3D Weather Display. Pilot-selectable 2-D and 3-D depictions of weather objects and terrain features are integrated into the display, and allow intuitive and direct evaluation of the relationship of these hazards to the intended route. We develop our 3D storms either with a tool that allows us freedom to fabricate what we want, or start with recorded NextRad weather files and apply simple rules to do simple instantiations of the weather cells. Mostly we do a bit of both.
The 3D Terrain Display provides location and strategic hazard cues to pilots.Flight planning incorporates real-time interactive hazard detection of terrain by orange highlighting of proximal regions of terrain along the present path. Route Analysis Tool used to resolve. The terrain conflict color on this route is yellow, to distinguish the conflict along the proposed route from the terrain conflict along the present route (in orange).By manipulating the route we can find a trajectory that is clear and implement it. In this case by altitude change.