SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 35
Baixar para ler offline
GEO4250 Reservoir Geology
Basic Well Log Analysis
Objectives
To give an insight in the basic well logging methods
used to derive petrophysical properties for hydrocarbon
exploration
Further Reading
• Asquith, G. and Krygowski, D. 2004. Basic Well Log Analysis,
2nd edition. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 28, 244pp
(incl CD)
• Schlumberger, 1989. Log Interpretation Principles/Applications
(available through Classfronter)
• Krygowski, D. 2003. Guide to Petrophysical Interpretation.
(available through Classfronter)
The borehole
During drilling a liquid mixture containing
clays and other natural materials, called
'Mud' is pumped down the drill string
forcing the rock cuttings up to the
surface. These cuttings are analysed for
indications of oil or gas.
Invasion
• Hydrostatic pressure of the mud
column is usually greater than the
pore pressure of the formations
• This forces mud filtrate into the
permeable formations and a mud
cake on the borehole wall
• The mud cake reduces further
infiltration
• Establishment of a
– Flushed zone
– Transition zone or Annulus
– Noninvaded, virgin or uncontamineted
zone
Open Hole Logs
• Logs recorded in the uncased
portion of the well bore
• Most frequently used in HC
exploration
• Cased Hole:
– The portion of the wellbore that has
had metal casing placed and
cemented to protect the openhole
from fluids, pressures, wellbore
stability problems or a combination
of these
Logging
Logging
• Three general types of logs:
– Electrical
e.g.
• Spontaneous Potential
• Resistivity
– Nuclear
e.g.
• Gamma Ray
• Density
• Neutron
– Acoustic / Sonic
e.g.
• Transit time
Importance of Geophysical
Well Logging
• Zone correlation
• Structure and Isopach mapping
• Defining physical rock characteristics:
– Lithology
– Porosity
– Pore geometry
– Permeability
• Identification of productive zones
• Determination of depth and thickness of zones
• Distinguish between oil, gas and water
• Estimation of hydrocarbon reserves
• Determination of facies relationships
Hydrocarbon Reserves
hArSN oep φ=
Np = Oil Reserves (stb)
φe = effective porosity
(fraction)
So = Oil saturation (fraction)
h = productive interval
thickness (m/ft)
A = drainage area (acres)
r = Recovery FactorSo = 1 - Sw
Logging
• Rock properties that affect logging measurements:
– Porosity
– Lithology
– Mineralogy
– Permeability
– Water Saturation
– Resistivity
How to measure these properties?
• Unfortunately, few of these petrophysical parameters can be directly
measured!
• Derived or inferred from measurements of other physical parameters,
such as:
– Resistivity
– Bulk density
– Interval transit time
– Spontaneous potential
– Natural radioactivity
– Hydrogen content of the rock
Wireline well logging
Porosity
• Defined as the ratio of voids to the total volume of rock. Symbol φ, fraction or
%
• Total porosity: total amount of voids in the rock volume
• Effective porosity: the amount of void space that is interconnected, and
thus able to transmit fluids
• Roughly:
• Primary porosity: The porosity preserved from deposition through
lithification.
• Secondary porosity:The porosity created through alteration of rock,
commonly by processes such as dolomitization, dissolution and fracturing
rockofvolumetotal
poresofvolumes
,porosity =φ
( )Vsh1te
−×φ=φ
Lithology and Mineralogy
• Lithology and Mineralogy used with some ambiquity
• Lithology is often used to desribe the solid matrix, primary
mineralogy
• Advanced logging techniques make it possible to estimate
mineralogy pairs or triads
• Nuclear measurements made on molecular-level interaction:
Mineralogy
• Acoustic measurements made on bulk-level interactions:
Lithology
• Shale and clay are also used with ambiquity
Permeability
• Is the ability of a rock to transmit fluids
• Symbol: K
• Measured in darcys or millidarcys (1 darcy = 9.8697x10-13 m2)
• Related to porosity but not always dependent
• Controlled by the size of the connecting passages between the
pores
• Formation waters, held by capillary pressure, may reduce the
permeability
Water Saturation
• The amount of pore volume in a rock that is occupied by formation
water. Symbol Sw, fraction or %
• Hydrocarbon saturation can be determined by the difference
between unity and water saturation
• Irreducible water saturation (Sw irr) is the term used to describe the
water saturation at which all the water is adsorbed on the grains in a
rock or is held in the capillaries by capillary pressure
rocktheinspaceporetotal
poresoccupyingwaterformation
S,saturationwater w
=
wh
S1S −=
Resistivity
• Rock property on which the entire science of logging first
developed
• Is the inherent property of all materials, regardless of their size
and shape, to resist the flow of an electric current
• Resistance depends on size and shape
• Resistivity is the reciprocal of conductivity
• Hydrocabons, rock and fresh water are highly resistive
• Salt water is highly conductive
Resistivity
• Symbol R, measured in Ω·m (ohm·m2/m)
• With r = resistance; A = area of substance being measured; L
= length of substance
• Resistivity is a basic measurement of a reservoir’s fluid
saturation and is a function of porosity, type of fluid, amount of
fluid and type of rock
L
Ar
R
×
=
Archie’s Principle
wRFR ×=0
m
a
F
φ
=
n
m
t
w
n
t
w
n
t
w
R
Ra
R
RF
R
R
S
111
0
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
×
×
=⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛ ×
=⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
=
φ
Experiments (Archie, 1942) show: • Sw = Water saturation
• F = Formation Resistivity Factor (a/φm):
• Porosity (φ)
• Tortuosity factor (a), 0.62-2.45
• Cementation factor (m), 1.0-2.15
• Rw = Resistivity of the formation water
• Rt = Resistivity of a rock with HC, i.e. true resistivity
• Ro = Resistivity of the 100% water-saturated rock
• Where there is no knowledge of local parameters the
following values can be used: n = m = 2.0; a = 1.0
Archie Equation for Water
Saturation
Borehole Environment
• Rock-fluid system is
disturbed and altered during
drilling
• Borehole Diameter (dh), c. 7-
12 inch
– Determined by the bit size, but
• May be larger due to wash
out
• May be smaller due to
build up of mud cake
Borehole Environment
• Drilling mud:
– Remove cuttings
– Lubricate and coll drill bit
– Maintain excess borehole
pressure over formation
pressure
• Mud filtrate into formation
• Build up of mud cake on
borehole walls
– Drilling mud (Rm), mud cake
(Rmc) and mud filtrate (Rmf)
resistivities are recorded
and used in interpretations
Borehole Environment
• Invaded Zone
– Zone around the borehole
where the original fluid content
has completely or partly been
replaced by drilling mud.
– Invaded Zone = Flushed Zone
+ Transition Zone (”Annulus”)
– Depth of invasion depends on
mud cake. Mud cake formation
more efficient in porous rocks,
causing less deep penetration
of mud filtrate in porous rocks
– Flushed Zone Resistivity; Rxo
– Residual oil in flushed zone.
Usually 70-95% is flushed out.
– Sro = 1 - Sxo
Borehole Environment
• Uninvaded Zone
– Pores uncontaminated by the
mud filtrate
– Pores contain formation
waters, oil and/or gas
– HC bearing reservoir always
have some fomation water on
grain contacts
– Uninvaded zone resistivity; Rt
– Ratio of Sw to Sxo is an index of
HC moveability
Invasion and Resistivity Profiles
a) Step Profile
b) Transition Profile
c) Annulus Profile
Rxo
Rxo
Rt = Ro
NB: Resistivity profiles for water reservoirs and fresh water muds
di djhmc
Distance from borehole
Resistivity
b
Rt = Ro
di djhmc
Distance from borehole
Resistivity
a
c
Rxo
di djhmc
Distance from borehole
Resistivity
Rt
Ro
Ri
Ri
Borehole wall
Invasion and Resistivity Profiles
• Freshwater vs. Saltwater
muds in water bearing
formations
• Freshwater:
– Rxo > Ri > Ro
• Saltwater
– Rxo ≈ Ri ≈ Ro
• NB These examples assume Sw to be more
than 60%
Freshwater muds
Rmf >> Rw
Saltwater muds
Rmf ≈ Rw
Rxo Ri Rt
Borehole wall
Mudcake
Rm
Rmf
Rw
Distance from borehole
ResistivityResistivity
Rxo
Rxo
Ro
Ro
Ri
Ri
Flushed
Zone
Invaded
Zone
Uninvaded
Zone
Invasion and Resistivity Profiles
• Freshwater vs. Saltwater muds
in hydrocarbon bearing
formations
• Freshwater:
– Rxo > Ri > Rt or
– Rxo > Ri < Rt
• Saltwater
– Rt > Ri > Rxo
• NB These examples assume Sw to be much less than
60%Freshwater muds
Rmf >> Rw
Rxo Ri Rt
Borehole wall
Mudcake
Saltwater muds
Rmf ≈ Rw
Rm
Rmf
Rw
Distance from borehole
ResistivityResistivity
Rxo
Rxo
Rt
Rt
Ri
Ri
Flushed
Zone
Invaded
Zone
Uninvaded
Zone
Annulus
Ran
Ran
Examples
• Water bearing zone with
Freshwater muds
– High resistivity in the flushed
zone, a lesser resistivity in the
invaded zone and a low
resistivity in the uninvaded
zone
Examples
• Water bearing zone with
Saltwater muds
– Low resistivity in the flushed,
invaded and uninvaded zones
Examples
• Hydrocarbon bearing zone and
Freshwater muds
– High resistivity in the flushed,
invaded and uninvaded zone
– Normally, the flushed zone has
a slightly higher resistivity than
the uninvaded zone
Examples
• Hydrocarbon bearing zone with
Saltwater muds
– Low resistivity in the flushed
zone, intermediate resistivity in
the invaded zone and high
resistivity in the uninvaded
zone
Lithology
Proper choice of tortuosity and cementation factors depends on the lithology,
therefore an estimate of lithology is important
a: Tortuosity
factor
m: Cementation
factor Comments
1.0 2.0 Carbonates1
0.81 2.0 Consolidated sandstones
0.62 2.15 Unconsolidated sands (Humble formula)
1.45 1.54 Average sands (after Carothers, 1968)
1.65 1.33 Shaly sands (after Carothers, 1968)
1.45 1.70 Calcareous sands (after Carothers, 1968)
0.85 2.14 Carbonates (after Carothers, 1968)
2.45 1.08 Pliocene sands, southern California (after Carothers and Porter, 1970)
1.97 1.29 Miocene sands, Texas-Louisiana Gulf Coast (after Carothers and Porter, 1970)
1.0 φ(2.05-φ) Clean, granular formations (after Sethi, 1979)
Formation Temperature
• Formation temperature is an important factor to know, since
the resistivities of the drilling mud (Rm), the mud filtrate (Rmf)
and the formation water (Rw) vary with temperature
• Can be calculated by knowing
– Formation depth
– Bottom hole temperature
– Total depth of the well
– Surface temperature
• Calculation of Formation Temperature:
– With
• x = depth
• y = temperature
• m = slope (?)
– geothermal gradient (dT/dy)
• c = constant (?)
– mean annual surface temperature
cmxy +=
Temperature
Depth
0,0
c
dT
dy
Formation Temperature
• Temperature Gradient
Calculation
– Assume:
• y = BHT (bottom hole
temperature) = 120 °C
• x = TD (total depth) =
4575m
• c = Mean ann. surface
temperature = 20 °C
• Formation Temperature
Calculation
– Assume:
• M = Geothermal gradient =
0.022 °C/m
• X = Formation depth =
2440m
• C = Mean ann. Surface
temperature = 20 °C
mC
dy
dT
/022.0
4575
20120
°=
−
= ( ) Cy °≈+×= 74202440022.0
Formation Temperature
Example
Given: Bottomhole depth = 11,000 ft and
bottomhole temperature = 200°F
(annual mean surface temperature =
80°F).
Find: Temperature at 8,000 ft.
Answer: The intersection of 11,000 ft on the y-
axis and 200°F on the x-axis is a
geothermal gradient of approximately
1.1°F/100 ft (Point A on the chart).
Move upward along an imaginary line
parallel to the constructed gradient lines
until the depth line for 8,000 ft is
intersected. This is Point B, for which
the temperature on the x-axis is
approximately 167°F.
By Chart
Correction of Rm, Rmf and Rw for
Formation Temperature
Ex. 1: [NaCl] given
Given: NaCl equivalent concentration = 20,000
ppm. Temperature of concentration =
75°F.
Find: Resistivity of the solution.
Answer: Enter the ppm concentration on the y-axis
and the temperature on the x-axis to locate
their point of intersection on the chart. The
value of this point on the left y-axis is 0.3
ohm-m at 75°F.
Ex. 2: Resistivity given
Given: Solution resistivity = 0.3 ohm-m at 75°F.
Find: Solution resistivity at 200°F [93°C].
Answer 1: Enter 0.3 ohm-m and 75°F and find their
intersection on the 20,000-ppm
concentration line. Follow the line to the
right to intersect the 200°F vertical line
(interpolate between existing lines if
necessary). The resistivity value for this
point on the left y-axis is 0.115 ohm-m.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Spontaneous potential Log
Spontaneous potential LogSpontaneous potential Log
Spontaneous potential Log
Jam Mahmood
 
Basic well log interpretation
Basic well log interpretationBasic well log interpretation
Basic well log interpretation
Shahnawaz Mustafa
 

Mais procurados (20)

Resistivity log
Resistivity logResistivity log
Resistivity log
 
Formation evaluation and well log correlation
Formation evaluation and well log correlationFormation evaluation and well log correlation
Formation evaluation and well log correlation
 
Basic well logging design
Basic well logging designBasic well logging design
Basic well logging design
 
Resistivity Log
Resistivity LogResistivity Log
Resistivity Log
 
Neutron log
Neutron logNeutron log
Neutron log
 
Introduction to Induction Logging
Introduction to Induction Logging Introduction to Induction Logging
Introduction to Induction Logging
 
4.resistivity log
4.resistivity log4.resistivity log
4.resistivity log
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
Spontaneous potential Log
Spontaneous potential LogSpontaneous potential Log
Spontaneous potential Log
 
Wll logging
Wll loggingWll logging
Wll logging
 
Well loggining. Gamma Ray log
Well loggining. Gamma Ray logWell loggining. Gamma Ray log
Well loggining. Gamma Ray log
 
Well Logging: 03 SP log 02
Well Logging: 03 SP log 02Well Logging: 03 SP log 02
Well Logging: 03 SP log 02
 
Basic Petrophysics
Basic PetrophysicsBasic Petrophysics
Basic Petrophysics
 
Laterologs
LaterologsLaterologs
Laterologs
 
Calculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturationCalculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturation
 
Calculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturationCalculating porosity and water saturation
Calculating porosity and water saturation
 
Neutron log
Neutron logNeutron log
Neutron log
 
Lecture_9_Well Logging.ppt
Lecture_9_Well Logging.pptLecture_9_Well Logging.ppt
Lecture_9_Well Logging.ppt
 
Basic well log interpretation
Basic well log interpretationBasic well log interpretation
Basic well log interpretation
 
Wll logging
Wll loggingWll logging
Wll logging
 

Destaque

formation evaluation chapter 1
formation evaluation chapter 1formation evaluation chapter 1
formation evaluation chapter 1
mohamadfadhli
 
Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01
Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01
Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01
petro11
 
Evaluation of low resistivity zones
Evaluation of low resistivity zonesEvaluation of low resistivity zones
Evaluation of low resistivity zones
Shahnawaz Mustafa
 
Simulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log Data
Simulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log DataSimulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log Data
Simulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log Data
Yien Tiong
 
45038163 geological-map-interpretation
45038163 geological-map-interpretation45038163 geological-map-interpretation
45038163 geological-map-interpretation
Shahnawaz Mustafa
 
Q921 log lec6 v1
Q921 log lec6 v1Q921 log lec6 v1
Q921 log lec6 v1
AFATous
 

Destaque (20)

well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapuwell logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
well logging tools and exercise_dileep p allavarapu
 
formation evaluation chapter 1
formation evaluation chapter 1formation evaluation chapter 1
formation evaluation chapter 1
 
Resistivity log
Resistivity logResistivity log
Resistivity log
 
Well logging analysis: methods and interpretation
Well logging analysis: methods and interpretationWell logging analysis: methods and interpretation
Well logging analysis: methods and interpretation
 
Basics of petroleum geology
Basics of petroleum geologyBasics of petroleum geology
Basics of petroleum geology
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
PhD Thesis 2008
PhD Thesis 2008PhD Thesis 2008
PhD Thesis 2008
 
Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01
Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01
Basicwellloginterpretation 120715012749-phpapp01
 
SLB Report on Geological Reefs
SLB Report on Geological ReefsSLB Report on Geological Reefs
SLB Report on Geological Reefs
 
Fmi log presentation
Fmi log presentationFmi log presentation
Fmi log presentation
 
Evaluation of low resistivity zones
Evaluation of low resistivity zonesEvaluation of low resistivity zones
Evaluation of low resistivity zones
 
Simulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log Data
Simulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log DataSimulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log Data
Simulating Reservoir Structure using Well Log Data
 
Sector bpo fabiansaavedra
Sector bpo fabiansaavedraSector bpo fabiansaavedra
Sector bpo fabiansaavedra
 
Oil Properties
Oil PropertiesOil Properties
Oil Properties
 
45038163 geological-map-interpretation
45038163 geological-map-interpretation45038163 geological-map-interpretation
45038163 geological-map-interpretation
 
Electrical Properties of Reservoir Rocks
Electrical Properties of Reservoir RocksElectrical Properties of Reservoir Rocks
Electrical Properties of Reservoir Rocks
 
Q921 log lec6 v1
Q921 log lec6 v1Q921 log lec6 v1
Q921 log lec6 v1
 
Well log data processing
Well log data processingWell log data processing
Well log data processing
 
Dental Caries (bacterial tooth loss)
Dental Caries (bacterial tooth loss) Dental Caries (bacterial tooth loss)
Dental Caries (bacterial tooth loss)
 
Geophysical well logging
Geophysical well loggingGeophysical well logging
Geophysical well logging
 

Semelhante a Oslo university basic well log analysis introduction

CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptxCHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptx
ALEXANDROCAYUBAMENDO
 
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdf
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdfCHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdf
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdf
ALEXANDROCAYUBAMENDO
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
Omer M. Ahmed
 

Semelhante a Oslo university basic well log analysis introduction (20)

Porosity
Porosity Porosity
Porosity
 
Presentation-Formation_Evaluation by well logging _ENI.pdf
Presentation-Formation_Evaluation by well logging _ENI.pdfPresentation-Formation_Evaluation by well logging _ENI.pdf
Presentation-Formation_Evaluation by well logging _ENI.pdf
 
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptxCHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pptx
 
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdf
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdfCHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdf
CHARACTERISTICS OF WIRELINE WELL LOGD USED IN THE.pdf
 
tight reservoir
tight reservoir tight reservoir
tight reservoir
 
Petroleum geology
Petroleum geologyPetroleum geology
Petroleum geology
 
Day 1 SS in WE.pptx
Day 1 SS in WE.pptxDay 1 SS in WE.pptx
Day 1 SS in WE.pptx
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
Subsurface geophysical methods
Subsurface geophysical methodsSubsurface geophysical methods
Subsurface geophysical methods
 
Reservoir porosity
Reservoir porosityReservoir porosity
Reservoir porosity
 
12 - NIH 2 - Groundmanagement issues of Hard rocks-Sep-16
12 - NIH 2 - Groundmanagement issues of Hard rocks-Sep-1612 - NIH 2 - Groundmanagement issues of Hard rocks-Sep-16
12 - NIH 2 - Groundmanagement issues of Hard rocks-Sep-16
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
Well logging ppt.pptx
Well logging ppt.pptxWell logging ppt.pptx
Well logging ppt.pptx
 
Rock properties
Rock propertiesRock properties
Rock properties
 
Rock properties
Rock propertiesRock properties
Rock properties
 
Well Log Analysis
Well Log AnalysisWell Log Analysis
Well Log Analysis
 
Reservoir heterogeneity
Reservoir heterogeneityReservoir heterogeneity
Reservoir heterogeneity
 
Coures-Formation Evalution for petroleum Engineering -heriot watt university.pdf
Coures-Formation Evalution for petroleum Engineering -heriot watt university.pdfCoures-Formation Evalution for petroleum Engineering -heriot watt university.pdf
Coures-Formation Evalution for petroleum Engineering -heriot watt university.pdf
 
4196644.ppt
4196644.ppt4196644.ppt
4196644.ppt
 
Reservoir rock
Reservoir rockReservoir rock
Reservoir rock
 

Oslo university basic well log analysis introduction

  • 2. Objectives To give an insight in the basic well logging methods used to derive petrophysical properties for hydrocarbon exploration
  • 3. Further Reading • Asquith, G. and Krygowski, D. 2004. Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd edition. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 28, 244pp (incl CD) • Schlumberger, 1989. Log Interpretation Principles/Applications (available through Classfronter) • Krygowski, D. 2003. Guide to Petrophysical Interpretation. (available through Classfronter)
  • 4. The borehole During drilling a liquid mixture containing clays and other natural materials, called 'Mud' is pumped down the drill string forcing the rock cuttings up to the surface. These cuttings are analysed for indications of oil or gas.
  • 5. Invasion • Hydrostatic pressure of the mud column is usually greater than the pore pressure of the formations • This forces mud filtrate into the permeable formations and a mud cake on the borehole wall • The mud cake reduces further infiltration • Establishment of a – Flushed zone – Transition zone or Annulus – Noninvaded, virgin or uncontamineted zone
  • 6. Open Hole Logs • Logs recorded in the uncased portion of the well bore • Most frequently used in HC exploration • Cased Hole: – The portion of the wellbore that has had metal casing placed and cemented to protect the openhole from fluids, pressures, wellbore stability problems or a combination of these
  • 8. Logging • Three general types of logs: – Electrical e.g. • Spontaneous Potential • Resistivity – Nuclear e.g. • Gamma Ray • Density • Neutron – Acoustic / Sonic e.g. • Transit time
  • 9. Importance of Geophysical Well Logging • Zone correlation • Structure and Isopach mapping • Defining physical rock characteristics: – Lithology – Porosity – Pore geometry – Permeability • Identification of productive zones • Determination of depth and thickness of zones • Distinguish between oil, gas and water • Estimation of hydrocarbon reserves • Determination of facies relationships
  • 10. Hydrocarbon Reserves hArSN oep φ= Np = Oil Reserves (stb) φe = effective porosity (fraction) So = Oil saturation (fraction) h = productive interval thickness (m/ft) A = drainage area (acres) r = Recovery FactorSo = 1 - Sw
  • 11. Logging • Rock properties that affect logging measurements: – Porosity – Lithology – Mineralogy – Permeability – Water Saturation – Resistivity
  • 12. How to measure these properties? • Unfortunately, few of these petrophysical parameters can be directly measured! • Derived or inferred from measurements of other physical parameters, such as: – Resistivity – Bulk density – Interval transit time – Spontaneous potential – Natural radioactivity – Hydrogen content of the rock Wireline well logging
  • 13. Porosity • Defined as the ratio of voids to the total volume of rock. Symbol φ, fraction or % • Total porosity: total amount of voids in the rock volume • Effective porosity: the amount of void space that is interconnected, and thus able to transmit fluids • Roughly: • Primary porosity: The porosity preserved from deposition through lithification. • Secondary porosity:The porosity created through alteration of rock, commonly by processes such as dolomitization, dissolution and fracturing rockofvolumetotal poresofvolumes ,porosity =φ ( )Vsh1te −×φ=φ
  • 14. Lithology and Mineralogy • Lithology and Mineralogy used with some ambiquity • Lithology is often used to desribe the solid matrix, primary mineralogy • Advanced logging techniques make it possible to estimate mineralogy pairs or triads • Nuclear measurements made on molecular-level interaction: Mineralogy • Acoustic measurements made on bulk-level interactions: Lithology • Shale and clay are also used with ambiquity
  • 15. Permeability • Is the ability of a rock to transmit fluids • Symbol: K • Measured in darcys or millidarcys (1 darcy = 9.8697x10-13 m2) • Related to porosity but not always dependent • Controlled by the size of the connecting passages between the pores • Formation waters, held by capillary pressure, may reduce the permeability
  • 16. Water Saturation • The amount of pore volume in a rock that is occupied by formation water. Symbol Sw, fraction or % • Hydrocarbon saturation can be determined by the difference between unity and water saturation • Irreducible water saturation (Sw irr) is the term used to describe the water saturation at which all the water is adsorbed on the grains in a rock or is held in the capillaries by capillary pressure rocktheinspaceporetotal poresoccupyingwaterformation S,saturationwater w = wh S1S −=
  • 17. Resistivity • Rock property on which the entire science of logging first developed • Is the inherent property of all materials, regardless of their size and shape, to resist the flow of an electric current • Resistance depends on size and shape • Resistivity is the reciprocal of conductivity • Hydrocabons, rock and fresh water are highly resistive • Salt water is highly conductive
  • 18. Resistivity • Symbol R, measured in Ω·m (ohm·m2/m) • With r = resistance; A = area of substance being measured; L = length of substance • Resistivity is a basic measurement of a reservoir’s fluid saturation and is a function of porosity, type of fluid, amount of fluid and type of rock L Ar R × =
  • 19. Archie’s Principle wRFR ×=0 m a F φ = n m t w n t w n t w R Ra R RF R R S 111 0 ⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ × × =⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ × =⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = φ Experiments (Archie, 1942) show: • Sw = Water saturation • F = Formation Resistivity Factor (a/φm): • Porosity (φ) • Tortuosity factor (a), 0.62-2.45 • Cementation factor (m), 1.0-2.15 • Rw = Resistivity of the formation water • Rt = Resistivity of a rock with HC, i.e. true resistivity • Ro = Resistivity of the 100% water-saturated rock • Where there is no knowledge of local parameters the following values can be used: n = m = 2.0; a = 1.0 Archie Equation for Water Saturation
  • 20. Borehole Environment • Rock-fluid system is disturbed and altered during drilling • Borehole Diameter (dh), c. 7- 12 inch – Determined by the bit size, but • May be larger due to wash out • May be smaller due to build up of mud cake
  • 21. Borehole Environment • Drilling mud: – Remove cuttings – Lubricate and coll drill bit – Maintain excess borehole pressure over formation pressure • Mud filtrate into formation • Build up of mud cake on borehole walls – Drilling mud (Rm), mud cake (Rmc) and mud filtrate (Rmf) resistivities are recorded and used in interpretations
  • 22. Borehole Environment • Invaded Zone – Zone around the borehole where the original fluid content has completely or partly been replaced by drilling mud. – Invaded Zone = Flushed Zone + Transition Zone (”Annulus”) – Depth of invasion depends on mud cake. Mud cake formation more efficient in porous rocks, causing less deep penetration of mud filtrate in porous rocks – Flushed Zone Resistivity; Rxo – Residual oil in flushed zone. Usually 70-95% is flushed out. – Sro = 1 - Sxo
  • 23. Borehole Environment • Uninvaded Zone – Pores uncontaminated by the mud filtrate – Pores contain formation waters, oil and/or gas – HC bearing reservoir always have some fomation water on grain contacts – Uninvaded zone resistivity; Rt – Ratio of Sw to Sxo is an index of HC moveability
  • 24. Invasion and Resistivity Profiles a) Step Profile b) Transition Profile c) Annulus Profile Rxo Rxo Rt = Ro NB: Resistivity profiles for water reservoirs and fresh water muds di djhmc Distance from borehole Resistivity b Rt = Ro di djhmc Distance from borehole Resistivity a c Rxo di djhmc Distance from borehole Resistivity Rt Ro Ri Ri Borehole wall
  • 25. Invasion and Resistivity Profiles • Freshwater vs. Saltwater muds in water bearing formations • Freshwater: – Rxo > Ri > Ro • Saltwater – Rxo ≈ Ri ≈ Ro • NB These examples assume Sw to be more than 60% Freshwater muds Rmf >> Rw Saltwater muds Rmf ≈ Rw Rxo Ri Rt Borehole wall Mudcake Rm Rmf Rw Distance from borehole ResistivityResistivity Rxo Rxo Ro Ro Ri Ri Flushed Zone Invaded Zone Uninvaded Zone
  • 26. Invasion and Resistivity Profiles • Freshwater vs. Saltwater muds in hydrocarbon bearing formations • Freshwater: – Rxo > Ri > Rt or – Rxo > Ri < Rt • Saltwater – Rt > Ri > Rxo • NB These examples assume Sw to be much less than 60%Freshwater muds Rmf >> Rw Rxo Ri Rt Borehole wall Mudcake Saltwater muds Rmf ≈ Rw Rm Rmf Rw Distance from borehole ResistivityResistivity Rxo Rxo Rt Rt Ri Ri Flushed Zone Invaded Zone Uninvaded Zone Annulus Ran Ran
  • 27. Examples • Water bearing zone with Freshwater muds – High resistivity in the flushed zone, a lesser resistivity in the invaded zone and a low resistivity in the uninvaded zone
  • 28. Examples • Water bearing zone with Saltwater muds – Low resistivity in the flushed, invaded and uninvaded zones
  • 29. Examples • Hydrocarbon bearing zone and Freshwater muds – High resistivity in the flushed, invaded and uninvaded zone – Normally, the flushed zone has a slightly higher resistivity than the uninvaded zone
  • 30. Examples • Hydrocarbon bearing zone with Saltwater muds – Low resistivity in the flushed zone, intermediate resistivity in the invaded zone and high resistivity in the uninvaded zone
  • 31. Lithology Proper choice of tortuosity and cementation factors depends on the lithology, therefore an estimate of lithology is important a: Tortuosity factor m: Cementation factor Comments 1.0 2.0 Carbonates1 0.81 2.0 Consolidated sandstones 0.62 2.15 Unconsolidated sands (Humble formula) 1.45 1.54 Average sands (after Carothers, 1968) 1.65 1.33 Shaly sands (after Carothers, 1968) 1.45 1.70 Calcareous sands (after Carothers, 1968) 0.85 2.14 Carbonates (after Carothers, 1968) 2.45 1.08 Pliocene sands, southern California (after Carothers and Porter, 1970) 1.97 1.29 Miocene sands, Texas-Louisiana Gulf Coast (after Carothers and Porter, 1970) 1.0 φ(2.05-φ) Clean, granular formations (after Sethi, 1979)
  • 32. Formation Temperature • Formation temperature is an important factor to know, since the resistivities of the drilling mud (Rm), the mud filtrate (Rmf) and the formation water (Rw) vary with temperature • Can be calculated by knowing – Formation depth – Bottom hole temperature – Total depth of the well – Surface temperature • Calculation of Formation Temperature: – With • x = depth • y = temperature • m = slope (?) – geothermal gradient (dT/dy) • c = constant (?) – mean annual surface temperature cmxy += Temperature Depth 0,0 c dT dy
  • 33. Formation Temperature • Temperature Gradient Calculation – Assume: • y = BHT (bottom hole temperature) = 120 °C • x = TD (total depth) = 4575m • c = Mean ann. surface temperature = 20 °C • Formation Temperature Calculation – Assume: • M = Geothermal gradient = 0.022 °C/m • X = Formation depth = 2440m • C = Mean ann. Surface temperature = 20 °C mC dy dT /022.0 4575 20120 °= − = ( ) Cy °≈+×= 74202440022.0
  • 34. Formation Temperature Example Given: Bottomhole depth = 11,000 ft and bottomhole temperature = 200°F (annual mean surface temperature = 80°F). Find: Temperature at 8,000 ft. Answer: The intersection of 11,000 ft on the y- axis and 200°F on the x-axis is a geothermal gradient of approximately 1.1°F/100 ft (Point A on the chart). Move upward along an imaginary line parallel to the constructed gradient lines until the depth line for 8,000 ft is intersected. This is Point B, for which the temperature on the x-axis is approximately 167°F. By Chart
  • 35. Correction of Rm, Rmf and Rw for Formation Temperature Ex. 1: [NaCl] given Given: NaCl equivalent concentration = 20,000 ppm. Temperature of concentration = 75°F. Find: Resistivity of the solution. Answer: Enter the ppm concentration on the y-axis and the temperature on the x-axis to locate their point of intersection on the chart. The value of this point on the left y-axis is 0.3 ohm-m at 75°F. Ex. 2: Resistivity given Given: Solution resistivity = 0.3 ohm-m at 75°F. Find: Solution resistivity at 200°F [93°C]. Answer 1: Enter 0.3 ohm-m and 75°F and find their intersection on the 20,000-ppm concentration line. Follow the line to the right to intersect the 200°F vertical line (interpolate between existing lines if necessary). The resistivity value for this point on the left y-axis is 0.115 ohm-m.