SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 10
Baixar para ler offline
A Report on the Results of the 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study
THE POSITIVE POWER OF
NEGATIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH
Turning the Danger of Negative Social Media Into Positive Results
JULY 2013
Neil Everett
SVP and CMO, LoyaltyOne
page 1
www.loyalty.com
Introduction
Next to financial results, customer feedback about a product/service or shopping experience is
usually foremost on the minds of marketers and executive management. Much like the “numbers,”
the voices and buying behaviors of consumers deliver the surest way to measure the impact of an
organization’s products and services on the marketplace. And these days, the customers’ voices have
reach like never before.
Of course, the voice of the customer is sometimes favorable and sometimes negative. In this
document we reveal insights from the 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study
regarding the business and behavioral impact of Negative Word-of-Mouth (WOM).
Word-of-Mouth is the oldest and in some ways
the most engaging form of advertising. Social
media has fed its impact, creating soapboxes for
influencers who can both help and hurt a brand
with the speed of a finger tap. Conventional and
proven thinking is that Negative Word-of-Mouth
can hurt a brand. The classic example is the
“United Breaks Guitars” video – a musician
expressing frustration with an airline over a
damaged guitar with more than 13 million views
on YouTube.
These days, brands learn from and react instantly
to consumer Word-of-Mouth. One example is the
wise move by distillery Maker’s Mark, which
swiftly reversed its decision to reduce the alcohol
content of its product (as a way to increase
production and meet exploding demand) in
response to vehement social media reaction.
Will Maker’s Mark’s reversal return sales to where they were prior to this misstep? Likely, yes,
but here’s another possible impact: The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study
suggests that the brand’s swift response, promptly communicated to the general public and to
The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media
Transaction Impact Study highlights two
major points:
1. Loyalty program members who spread
Negative Word-of-Mouth
are often your best cus-
tomers. Their passion
can be leveraged as the
core of a well-designed
recovery program.
2. Taking the “temperature” of the
Negative WOM guides appropriate
action in response.
its best customers, might lead to increased sales. Why? A combination of “arousing” the customer
base and therefore indirectly reminding them of their passion for the brand, followed quickly by
re-establishing what customers love.
This isn’t to suggest that you want to incite your customers with bad news in order to fuel Word-of-
Mouth and subsequent engagement. Yes, it’s an interesting twist on “Surprise and Delight” – the
concept of giving program members, particularly best customers, an unexpected perk to refresh
their appreciation of the program, remind them of the benefits and bring the program top of mind.
The goal of Surprise and Delight, of course, is to spur future activity. But
as one of my colleagues noted, “If you’re going to wake anybody up,
wake them up with a kiss instead of a kick.”
Also, this isn’t a matter of the dusty public relations axiom of “We don’t
care what you say about us – just spell our name right.” It’s a matter of
knowing who your most engaged, valuable and vocal customers are,
and leveraging their passion to your benefit – and, of course, to theirs.
And that’s the important point. Customers’ negative “vocal” activity is a
type of engagement with the brand, engagement that reflects the
intensity of brand passion. The very instance of a “negative” engagement is both a warning and,
when best practices are employed, an opportunity.
Passionate customers are often the quickest to praise you, recommend you and advocate for you.
They are “Brand Champions,” as described by COLLOQUY in its 2009 and 2011 Word-of-Mouth
Studies. On the other hand, those same Brand Champions are also the quickest to take you to task
when they’re disappointed. Brand Champions who feel slighted can swiftly
convert to what COLLOQUY calls “Madvocates,” with the passion and
power to influence a network of other consumers. But the conversion to
Madvocacy can be reversed – and remediated to an overall positive –
because of the Champions’ passion that fuels vocal expression and
transactional behavior.
When a company’s customers start to control the rhetoric concerning a
brand’s reputation, it might seem like a good time to duck for cover. But
such a reaction fails to leverage the hidden power of Negative WOM.
Instead, companies must determine the specific level of Negative WOM
that triggers a call-to-action, and what that action should be.
www.loyalty.com
page 2
70%That’s the increased
value of customers in
our study who were
active in social media
36%That’s the transaction
lift demonstrated by
customers posting neg-
ative comments who
redeemed for rewards
after their posts were
made
Keyboards heat up
To demonstrate this point, we turn to the 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study.
Specifically, recent initiatives by theAIR MILES Reward Program, Canada’s most recognized loyalty program,
provide a case study that illustrates how social commentary impacts consumer purchasing behavior.
In December 2011, AIR MILES – which serves more than ten million members (known as “Collectors”) –
simultaneously launched two program changes:
• A feature called AIR MILES Cash, which allows Collectors to instantly redeem reward miles
collected in the program in full or partial payment when shopping at participating Sponsor
locations.
• A program change regarding the guidelines for unredeemed AIR MILES reward miles.
The resulting social media commentary gave AIR MILES an opportunity to analyze Negative WOM and to
determine how it impacted subsequent transaction and redemption behaviors of both those posting
the comments and those simply viewing them. In this case, LoyaltyOne followed the Community website
commentary of a subset of Collectors who had previously opted in and granted permission for such
observation.
Sensitive to the needs of its Collectors, AIR MILES had anticipated a certain level of Negative WOM
from its customers regarding the new redemption policy. As with any established program, when
program rules are adjusted or changed, engaged members express their opinions. As can be expected,
some customers who expressed negative opinions were only mildly upset by the changes, while others
were much more expressive in their sentiments.
But what we couldn't forecast was the degree to which those reactions would impact customer
involvement with the program.
The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social MediaTransaction Impact Study uncovered the temperature range of Nega-
tive WOM, including nuances in words that determine how concerned a brand should be when gaug-
ing the sentiments that customers express. For example, consumers who were simply disappointed or
concerned typically use words like “doubt,” “surprise” and “confusion” in their commentary. Frustrated
customers, those most at risk of leaving the program, tended to use words like “disgusted,” “angry”
and “outraged.”
www.loyalty.com
page 3
DoubtfulDoubtfulDoubtful OutragedOutragedOutragedSurprisedSurprised
ConfusedConfused
Surprised
Confused
DisgustedDisgusted
AngryAngry
Disgusted
Angry
Disappointed and/or Concerned Frustrated and at Risk of Leaving
www.loyalty.com
In analyzing the impact of such
commentary, the study first deter-
mined that the people who posted
comments were generally more
valuable customers overall. The
study examined Collector activity
by posters in the four weeks prior to
the two announcements, versus
non-posters in that period. The dia-
gram on the right shows that Col-
lectors who later posted were
significantly more engaged than
those who later only viewed the
posts or those in an offline control
group. (In this context, “engage-
ment” is associated with earning
loyalty program currency, redeem-
ing for rewards, and otherwise ac-
tively participating in the program.)
Posters were 70% more actively
engaged with the AIR MILES Re-
ward Program as Collectors than
non-posters.
We can conclude that many neg-
ative commentators were angry
precisely because of their emotional
connection with the program.
They were more engaged in thefirst
place, and therefore were more
passionate in expressing their
opinions. Their commentary con-
tained more detail, with greater
intensity of anger and a length
three times that of the typical
post.
page 4
The Power of Social Media Posters
On the AIR MILES Reward Program Community Page
Transaction and redemption activity shows that posters are
70% more valuable than non-posters.
Source: 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study
• Numbers scaled to base 100
• Posters: n = 76
• Viewers: n = 1,094
• Control Group: n = 10,000
Transaction Miles
Redemption Miles
Posters
Transaction Miles
Redemption Miles
Viewers
Transaction Miles
Redemption Miles
Control
www.loyalty.com
There was further proof that producers of
Negative WOM emerge from the program’s
most engaged member base. About a third of
negative posters made redemptions after
they posted their commentary. The study ex-
amined the downstream activity of Collec-
tors who made redemptions after the
negative comments were posted. The nega-
tive posters who redeemed exhibited a lift of
36% in collection activity over the level be-
fore the announcements. That compared to a
21% increase from redeemers within the
Control Group over the same time period.
The catalyst? Heightened engagement. The announcements and the resulting Negative WOM com-
mentary appear to have acted as a reminder, placing the program at the forefront of the negative
posters’ minds. By redeeming, these Collectors were further reminded of the value they extracted from
the program, leading to increased activity. The reasons members had established their relationship
with the brand in the first place had been highlighted, and these more-valuable customers responded.
During periods of Negative WOM the
temperature of commentary will reach
a threshold at which your company
feels compelled to craft responses, as
appropriate, that lead the conversation
back to the brand’s core benefits. In
this case, AIR MILES responded by
monitoring customer comments, pro-
viding answers to specific questions
and addressing rumors or inaccuracies
as they were expressed. With careful
management, Negative WOM can
prove a positive boost for engagement,
but only if mediated by a simultaneous
positive experience linked to the pro-
gram’s core value proposition.
page 5
Source: 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study
Control Gr
oup
LIFT
21%
Negative W
OMRedeemers
LIFT
36%
Redemptions Fuel Transaction Lift
Experiencing value inspires
heightened activity from the most
passionate customers, as demonstrated in
the AIR MILES Reward Program study.
Source: 2013 LoyaltyOne Social
Media Transaction Impact Study
The combination of angry
words and threats to leave
the program inflicted this
impact on downstream
purchase frequency in the
AIR MILES Reward Program
study:
The Impact of the
“Hot-Negative”
Social Media Poster
12%
Miles
Accumulated
Purchase
Frequency
34%
www.loyalty.com
Taking the Temperature of WOM
The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social MediaTransaction Impact Study also revealed the different “temperatures” of
Negative WOM. Some customers may say they are disappointed or confused by changes in a program (or
simply have questions), while others will express anger and possibly threaten to leave (what we
call a “Hot-Negative” response). Angry customers may create short-term storm clouds, but
brands must separate that from the potential long-term damage created by ignoring or mis-
handling an angry poster. Brands should concentrate their efforts on the vocal commentators.
In the study sample, 64% of the posters expressed anger, and over half of them threatened to quit the
program. The combination of “anger” plus “intention to exit” created a 34% decrease in such posters’
subsequent reward miles accumulated, and a 12% decrease in purchase frequency, adjusted for seasonality.
Other combinations of emotions, such as “disappointment” plus “intention to exit,” and “concern/
confusion/surprise” plus “intention to exit” didn’t have a statistically significant impact on behavior.
Therefore, “Hot-Negative” comments, coupled with a stated intention to exit, are where marketing
interventions should focus.
Keeping the passion positive
Of course, loyalty programs want and need passionate members. But with any relationship, emotion
doesn’t always flow in a favorable direction. Programs must attentively monitor the relationship with
an eye to keeping it positive, particularly when implementing program change. Madvocacy is
damaging to the business in the short term. Negative WOM in this socially-connected age is a
reality no brand can afford to ignore. While the best remedy may be prevention, a strategy
of service recovery is required.
Consider these recommendations.
Use the data. Analyze transactions, redemptions and social media traffic
data from both posters and viewers during and after any period provoking
Negative WOM. If there is a brief impact followed by a quick return to nor-
mal levels – as there might be with a small change like a price increase –
further action is likely unwarranted. While customer disappointment over a change, service
issue or another matter may compel a company to react beyond normal customer commu-
nications, that’s not always appropriate, effective or even necessary.
page 6
•••
www.loyalty.com
Take action if the social media “buzz” and sales indicate a more negative
customer sentiment. Prepare a targeted recovery plan for when Negative
WOM strikes. Employ communications strategies that emphasize the value
that both parties receive from the relationship. For example, express appre-
ciation, and promote positive program incentives and features such as redemption in order
to counter negative commentary.
Be swift and sincere in your response. Recognize Negative WOM posters’
opinions and remind them of the benefits they derive from being members
of your program to maximize the potential of critical posters remaining en-
gaged at high levels, and increasing future transactional behavior. React in
a non-confrontational manner to reassure posters and viewers alike that the brand cares
about customer opinion.
Go public. Angry customers can become better customers downstream if
they continue to experience the benefits provided by the brand. Yet, ex-
pressions of anger and intent to exit may not only signal lower future pur-
chase behavior by those posting messages, but can also precede dampened
transaction activity for the viewers of such messages. Therefore, we recommend publicly re-
sponding, through the same social media channels, to ensure that the positive changes are
noticed by the same viewers of the negative posts.
Ultimately, a good starting point for your reaction plan is to focus on what makes members loyal to a
program in the first place – and doing so publicly. As with personal relationships, arguing is not fun, but
making up is.
Conclusion: Be positively engaged
Nobody likes to hear negative comments, but those comments don’t necessarily have a negative impact
on your business. Even a company’s most outspoken critics have passion for the brand, and their activity
can actually be proof of high customer engagement. Understanding the source of criticism, focusing on
the “temperature” of the comments, and preparing a strategy for recovery can spur surprisingly positive
consumer behaviors from even the most bitter grumblers.
To gain timely insight into this and other important loyalty topics,
sign up for the LoyaltyOne INSIDER www. loyalty.com/e-newsletter
page 7
•••
•••
•••
www.loyalty.com
Appendix: Methodology
LoyaltyOne worked with a team of researchers and linguistic analysts from Northwestern University’s
Medill IMC Spiegel Research Initiative. The analysts examined the actual posting experience of 76 indi-
viduals who posted 110 separate comments which were viewed by 1,094 other unique Collectors. The
team categorized every post by the emotional tone and nature of its content, separating questions from
statements and measuring emotions such as “Anger,” “Confusion,” and “Concern.” They also recorded
whether a Collector had posted, viewed posts, or both. Linking each posting and viewing event back to
each Collector’s transaction and redemption data, the analysts compared behaviors in the four weeks
before and eleven weeks after the announcements against a control group of 10,000 offline Collectors
over the same period. This information was collected only from a sub-set of Collectors who had granted
permission to the company to track their social media behavior there.
page 8
ABOUT
The Author
Neil Everett is Chief Marketing Officer of LoyaltyOne. He is responsible for all aspects
of marketing the AIR MILES Reward Program, including brand management, marketing
strategy, and communications, encompassing mass and integrated marketing as well
as emerging channels such as mobile and social, rewards strategy, procurement and
fulfillment. His focus as CMO is on growing and evolving consumer engagement to
ensure the continued leadership of North America’s premier coalition loyalty program. Everett also leads
SquareKnot, a full-service integrated marketing agency under the LoyaltyOne umbrella.
ABOUT
LoyaltyOne
LoyaltyOne is a global leader in the design and implementation of coalition loyalty programs, customer
analytics and loyalty management solutions for Fortune 1000 clients around the world. LoyaltyOne’s
unparalleled track record in the loyalty marketplace stems from its unique combination of pragmatic,
hands-on experience and continuous thought leadership. LoyaltyOne has over 20 years’ history lever-
aging data-driven insights to develop and operate some of the world’s most effective loyalty programs
and customer-centric solutions. These include the AIR MILES Reward Program, North America’s premier
coalition loyalty program and a working partnership with Latin America’s leading coalition program,
dotz. LoyaltyOne is also the owner of COLLOQUY, a group dedicated to research, publishing and educa-
tion for the global loyalty industry. LoyaltyOne is an Alliance Data company.
For more information, visit www.loyalty.com.
www.loyalty.com
linkedin.com/company/LoyaltyOne
@LoyaltyOneInc
facebook.com/LoyaltyOneInc
Connect with LoyaltyOne
page 9

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Driving Effectiveness with Talkworthy Advertising
Driving Effectiveness with Talkworthy AdvertisingDriving Effectiveness with Talkworthy Advertising
Driving Effectiveness with Talkworthy AdvertisingKeller Fay Group
 
Facebook Case analysis
Facebook Case analysisFacebook Case analysis
Facebook Case analysisZankee Gulati
 
Effect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cb
Effect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cbEffect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cb
Effect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cbRajeev K
 
The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)
The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)
The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)Keller Fay Group
 
A Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOM
A Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOMA Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOM
A Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOMKeller Fay Group
 
Social CRM: Laying the Foundation
Social CRM: Laying the FoundationSocial CRM: Laying the Foundation
Social CRM: Laying the FoundationChristine Kitson
 
The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix
The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix
The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix Fernando Barrenechea
 
Reciprocity, Rewards and Real Breakthrough
Reciprocity, Rewards and Real BreakthroughReciprocity, Rewards and Real Breakthrough
Reciprocity, Rewards and Real BreakthroughKantar
 
What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?
What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?
What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?Media Logic
 
Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...
Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...
Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...Merlien Institute
 
Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?
Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?
Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?Ogilvy Consulting
 
Influence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay Group
Influence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay GroupInfluence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay Group
Influence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay GroupKeller Fay Group
 
MBohnCourseProject
MBohnCourseProjectMBohnCourseProject
MBohnCourseProjectMarah Bohn
 
Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013
Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013
Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013Liam Dowd
 
Digital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing Success
Digital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing SuccessDigital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing Success
Digital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing SuccessVivastream
 

Mais procurados (19)

Driving Effectiveness with Talkworthy Advertising
Driving Effectiveness with Talkworthy AdvertisingDriving Effectiveness with Talkworthy Advertising
Driving Effectiveness with Talkworthy Advertising
 
Facebook Case analysis
Facebook Case analysisFacebook Case analysis
Facebook Case analysis
 
Effect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cb
Effect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cbEffect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cb
Effect on word of mouth and e word of mouth on cb
 
The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)
The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)
The Power of Positive Word of Mouth (WOM)
 
A Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOM
A Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOMA Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOM
A Holistic Approach to the Measurement of WOM
 
Social CRM: Laying the Foundation
Social CRM: Laying the FoundationSocial CRM: Laying the Foundation
Social CRM: Laying the Foundation
 
The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix
The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix
The Power of e-Word of Mouth. Adding Social Media to the Marketing Mix
 
Reciprocity, Rewards and Real Breakthrough
Reciprocity, Rewards and Real BreakthroughReciprocity, Rewards and Real Breakthrough
Reciprocity, Rewards and Real Breakthrough
 
What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?
What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?
What Direct Mail Messaging Do Seniors Prefer?
 
Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...
Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...
Mobile value exchange: How incentivization changes mobile behavior - Dynamic ...
 
ORM
ORMORM
ORM
 
Word of mouth marketing
Word of mouth marketingWord of mouth marketing
Word of mouth marketing
 
Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?
Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?
Snapchat pay for replay and lenses: why should brands care?
 
Influence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay Group
Influence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay GroupInfluence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay Group
Influence and impact across all channels - Keller Fay Group
 
MBohnCourseProject
MBohnCourseProjectMBohnCourseProject
MBohnCourseProject
 
Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013
Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013
Social Media for Customer Service Report 2013
 
5 ways-to-encourage-sharing
5 ways-to-encourage-sharing5 ways-to-encourage-sharing
5 ways-to-encourage-sharing
 
Bank Whitepaper
Bank WhitepaperBank Whitepaper
Bank Whitepaper
 
Digital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing Success
Digital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing SuccessDigital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing Success
Digital Impact The Two Secrets to Online Marketing Success
 

Destaque

Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)
Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)
Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)Lois Patterson
 
Key Terms for Web Searching Techniques
Key Terms for Web Searching TechniquesKey Terms for Web Searching Techniques
Key Terms for Web Searching Techniqueschloeparker97
 
Markup languages and warp-speed documentation
Markup languages and warp-speed documentationMarkup languages and warp-speed documentation
Markup languages and warp-speed documentationLois Patterson
 
Reading lesson presentation
Reading lesson presentationReading lesson presentation
Reading lesson presentationTracy Huckaby
 
The rules of baseball
The rules of baseballThe rules of baseball
The rules of baseballjustin1093
 
STC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based Approach
STC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based ApproachSTC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based Approach
STC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based ApproachLois Patterson
 
Thin Layer Chroatography
Thin Layer ChroatographyThin Layer Chroatography
Thin Layer ChroatographyAmrutaSambrekar
 

Destaque (18)

Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)
Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)
Mathematical content in documentation (DITA Europe 2008)
 
Key Terms for Web Searching Techniques
Key Terms for Web Searching TechniquesKey Terms for Web Searching Techniques
Key Terms for Web Searching Techniques
 
The FOCUS for how different people may prefer
The FOCUS for how different people may preferThe FOCUS for how different people may prefer
The FOCUS for how different people may prefer
 
Teamwork Agenda 070910
Teamwork Agenda 070910Teamwork Agenda 070910
Teamwork Agenda 070910
 
DevLearn Presentation Final V3 093015 jm
DevLearn Presentation Final V3 093015 jmDevLearn Presentation Final V3 093015 jm
DevLearn Presentation Final V3 093015 jm
 
Markup languages and warp-speed documentation
Markup languages and warp-speed documentationMarkup languages and warp-speed documentation
Markup languages and warp-speed documentation
 
Reading lesson presentation
Reading lesson presentationReading lesson presentation
Reading lesson presentation
 
Executive Summary - Leadership Foundations
Executive Summary - Leadership FoundationsExecutive Summary - Leadership Foundations
Executive Summary - Leadership Foundations
 
The rules of baseball
The rules of baseballThe rules of baseball
The rules of baseball
 
Operating Systems
Operating SystemsOperating Systems
Operating Systems
 
Coaching for Results GSO
Coaching for Results GSOCoaching for Results GSO
Coaching for Results GSO
 
STC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based Approach
STC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based ApproachSTC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based Approach
STC Summit 2015: API Documentation, an Example-Based Approach
 
Re phys3 meca_ther
Re phys3 meca_therRe phys3 meca_ther
Re phys3 meca_ther
 
Critical Contact Center Skills NEW
Critical Contact Center Skills NEWCritical Contact Center Skills NEW
Critical Contact Center Skills NEW
 
Internal Consulting Skills
Internal Consulting SkillsInternal Consulting Skills
Internal Consulting Skills
 
Thin Layer Chroatography
Thin Layer ChroatographyThin Layer Chroatography
Thin Layer Chroatography
 
Dosage Regimen
Dosage RegimenDosage Regimen
Dosage Regimen
 
Mass Spectroscopy
Mass SpectroscopyMass Spectroscopy
Mass Spectroscopy
 

Semelhante a The_Positive_Power_of_Negative_WOM

How To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptx
How To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptxHow To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptx
How To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptxTTDigitals
 
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docxWeek 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docxcockekeshia
 
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docxWeek 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docxmelbruce90096
 
Customer Centric Social Media Briefing
Customer Centric Social Media BriefingCustomer Centric Social Media Briefing
Customer Centric Social Media BriefingUseful Social Media
 
Your Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into Opportunity
Your Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into OpportunityYour Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into Opportunity
Your Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into OpportunityMicrosoft India
 
2015 Influencer Marketing Guide
2015 Influencer Marketing Guide2015 Influencer Marketing Guide
2015 Influencer Marketing GuideMohamed Mahdy
 
Market probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paper
Market probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paperMarket probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paper
Market probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paperMichael Lowenstein
 
Word of Mouth Marketing.pptx
Word of Mouth Marketing.pptxWord of Mouth Marketing.pptx
Word of Mouth Marketing.pptxMarina Ibrahim
 
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing ReportFluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing ReportRazorfish
 
Razorfish fluent
Razorfish fluentRazorfish fluent
Razorfish fluentad_crystal
 
Social Influence Media by Fluent
Social Influence Media by FluentSocial Influence Media by Fluent
Social Influence Media by FluentRalph Paglia
 
Measuring Social Influence Marketing
Measuring Social Influence MarketingMeasuring Social Influence Marketing
Measuring Social Influence MarketingJulius Trujillo
 
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing ReportFluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing ReportMatthew Pantoja
 
Social Influence Marketing
Social Influence MarketingSocial Influence Marketing
Social Influence Marketing...
 

Semelhante a The_Positive_Power_of_Negative_WOM (20)

Respect My Authoritah!
Respect My Authoritah!Respect My Authoritah!
Respect My Authoritah!
 
How To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptx
How To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptxHow To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptx
How To Leverage The True Potential Of Influencer.pptx
 
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docxWeek 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
 
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docxWeek 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
Week 2, Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Empowerment, and Mana.docx
 
The Social Sales Process
The Social Sales ProcessThe Social Sales Process
The Social Sales Process
 
Customer Centric Social Media Briefing
Customer Centric Social Media BriefingCustomer Centric Social Media Briefing
Customer Centric Social Media Briefing
 
Your Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into Opportunity
Your Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into OpportunityYour Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into Opportunity
Your Brand Sux - Turning Social Sentiment into Opportunity
 
2015 Influencer Marketing Guide
2015 Influencer Marketing Guide2015 Influencer Marketing Guide
2015 Influencer Marketing Guide
 
Market probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paper
Market probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paperMarket probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paper
Market probe loyalty programs vs. loyalty behavior white paper
 
Word of Mouth Marketing.pptx
Word of Mouth Marketing.pptxWord of Mouth Marketing.pptx
Word of Mouth Marketing.pptx
 
Web 2.0: Social Media Buyer's Guide
Web 2.0: Social Media Buyer's GuideWeb 2.0: Social Media Buyer's Guide
Web 2.0: Social Media Buyer's Guide
 
19279
1927919279
19279
 
19279
1927919279
19279
 
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing ReportFluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
 
Razorfish fluent
Razorfish fluentRazorfish fluent
Razorfish fluent
 
Social Influence Media by Fluent
Social Influence Media by FluentSocial Influence Media by Fluent
Social Influence Media by Fluent
 
Measuring Social Influence Marketing
Measuring Social Influence MarketingMeasuring Social Influence Marketing
Measuring Social Influence Marketing
 
Social Influence Marketing Report
Social Influence Marketing ReportSocial Influence Marketing Report
Social Influence Marketing Report
 
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing ReportFluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
Fluent: The Razorfish Social Influence Marketing Report
 
Social Influence Marketing
Social Influence MarketingSocial Influence Marketing
Social Influence Marketing
 

The_Positive_Power_of_Negative_WOM

  • 1. A Report on the Results of the 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study THE POSITIVE POWER OF NEGATIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH Turning the Danger of Negative Social Media Into Positive Results JULY 2013 Neil Everett SVP and CMO, LoyaltyOne
  • 2. page 1 www.loyalty.com Introduction Next to financial results, customer feedback about a product/service or shopping experience is usually foremost on the minds of marketers and executive management. Much like the “numbers,” the voices and buying behaviors of consumers deliver the surest way to measure the impact of an organization’s products and services on the marketplace. And these days, the customers’ voices have reach like never before. Of course, the voice of the customer is sometimes favorable and sometimes negative. In this document we reveal insights from the 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study regarding the business and behavioral impact of Negative Word-of-Mouth (WOM). Word-of-Mouth is the oldest and in some ways the most engaging form of advertising. Social media has fed its impact, creating soapboxes for influencers who can both help and hurt a brand with the speed of a finger tap. Conventional and proven thinking is that Negative Word-of-Mouth can hurt a brand. The classic example is the “United Breaks Guitars” video – a musician expressing frustration with an airline over a damaged guitar with more than 13 million views on YouTube. These days, brands learn from and react instantly to consumer Word-of-Mouth. One example is the wise move by distillery Maker’s Mark, which swiftly reversed its decision to reduce the alcohol content of its product (as a way to increase production and meet exploding demand) in response to vehement social media reaction. Will Maker’s Mark’s reversal return sales to where they were prior to this misstep? Likely, yes, but here’s another possible impact: The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study suggests that the brand’s swift response, promptly communicated to the general public and to The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study highlights two major points: 1. Loyalty program members who spread Negative Word-of-Mouth are often your best cus- tomers. Their passion can be leveraged as the core of a well-designed recovery program. 2. Taking the “temperature” of the Negative WOM guides appropriate action in response.
  • 3. its best customers, might lead to increased sales. Why? A combination of “arousing” the customer base and therefore indirectly reminding them of their passion for the brand, followed quickly by re-establishing what customers love. This isn’t to suggest that you want to incite your customers with bad news in order to fuel Word-of- Mouth and subsequent engagement. Yes, it’s an interesting twist on “Surprise and Delight” – the concept of giving program members, particularly best customers, an unexpected perk to refresh their appreciation of the program, remind them of the benefits and bring the program top of mind. The goal of Surprise and Delight, of course, is to spur future activity. But as one of my colleagues noted, “If you’re going to wake anybody up, wake them up with a kiss instead of a kick.” Also, this isn’t a matter of the dusty public relations axiom of “We don’t care what you say about us – just spell our name right.” It’s a matter of knowing who your most engaged, valuable and vocal customers are, and leveraging their passion to your benefit – and, of course, to theirs. And that’s the important point. Customers’ negative “vocal” activity is a type of engagement with the brand, engagement that reflects the intensity of brand passion. The very instance of a “negative” engagement is both a warning and, when best practices are employed, an opportunity. Passionate customers are often the quickest to praise you, recommend you and advocate for you. They are “Brand Champions,” as described by COLLOQUY in its 2009 and 2011 Word-of-Mouth Studies. On the other hand, those same Brand Champions are also the quickest to take you to task when they’re disappointed. Brand Champions who feel slighted can swiftly convert to what COLLOQUY calls “Madvocates,” with the passion and power to influence a network of other consumers. But the conversion to Madvocacy can be reversed – and remediated to an overall positive – because of the Champions’ passion that fuels vocal expression and transactional behavior. When a company’s customers start to control the rhetoric concerning a brand’s reputation, it might seem like a good time to duck for cover. But such a reaction fails to leverage the hidden power of Negative WOM. Instead, companies must determine the specific level of Negative WOM that triggers a call-to-action, and what that action should be. www.loyalty.com page 2 70%That’s the increased value of customers in our study who were active in social media 36%That’s the transaction lift demonstrated by customers posting neg- ative comments who redeemed for rewards after their posts were made
  • 4. Keyboards heat up To demonstrate this point, we turn to the 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study. Specifically, recent initiatives by theAIR MILES Reward Program, Canada’s most recognized loyalty program, provide a case study that illustrates how social commentary impacts consumer purchasing behavior. In December 2011, AIR MILES – which serves more than ten million members (known as “Collectors”) – simultaneously launched two program changes: • A feature called AIR MILES Cash, which allows Collectors to instantly redeem reward miles collected in the program in full or partial payment when shopping at participating Sponsor locations. • A program change regarding the guidelines for unredeemed AIR MILES reward miles. The resulting social media commentary gave AIR MILES an opportunity to analyze Negative WOM and to determine how it impacted subsequent transaction and redemption behaviors of both those posting the comments and those simply viewing them. In this case, LoyaltyOne followed the Community website commentary of a subset of Collectors who had previously opted in and granted permission for such observation. Sensitive to the needs of its Collectors, AIR MILES had anticipated a certain level of Negative WOM from its customers regarding the new redemption policy. As with any established program, when program rules are adjusted or changed, engaged members express their opinions. As can be expected, some customers who expressed negative opinions were only mildly upset by the changes, while others were much more expressive in their sentiments. But what we couldn't forecast was the degree to which those reactions would impact customer involvement with the program. The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social MediaTransaction Impact Study uncovered the temperature range of Nega- tive WOM, including nuances in words that determine how concerned a brand should be when gaug- ing the sentiments that customers express. For example, consumers who were simply disappointed or concerned typically use words like “doubt,” “surprise” and “confusion” in their commentary. Frustrated customers, those most at risk of leaving the program, tended to use words like “disgusted,” “angry” and “outraged.” www.loyalty.com page 3 DoubtfulDoubtfulDoubtful OutragedOutragedOutragedSurprisedSurprised ConfusedConfused Surprised Confused DisgustedDisgusted AngryAngry Disgusted Angry Disappointed and/or Concerned Frustrated and at Risk of Leaving
  • 5. www.loyalty.com In analyzing the impact of such commentary, the study first deter- mined that the people who posted comments were generally more valuable customers overall. The study examined Collector activity by posters in the four weeks prior to the two announcements, versus non-posters in that period. The dia- gram on the right shows that Col- lectors who later posted were significantly more engaged than those who later only viewed the posts or those in an offline control group. (In this context, “engage- ment” is associated with earning loyalty program currency, redeem- ing for rewards, and otherwise ac- tively participating in the program.) Posters were 70% more actively engaged with the AIR MILES Re- ward Program as Collectors than non-posters. We can conclude that many neg- ative commentators were angry precisely because of their emotional connection with the program. They were more engaged in thefirst place, and therefore were more passionate in expressing their opinions. Their commentary con- tained more detail, with greater intensity of anger and a length three times that of the typical post. page 4 The Power of Social Media Posters On the AIR MILES Reward Program Community Page Transaction and redemption activity shows that posters are 70% more valuable than non-posters. Source: 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study • Numbers scaled to base 100 • Posters: n = 76 • Viewers: n = 1,094 • Control Group: n = 10,000 Transaction Miles Redemption Miles Posters Transaction Miles Redemption Miles Viewers Transaction Miles Redemption Miles Control
  • 6. www.loyalty.com There was further proof that producers of Negative WOM emerge from the program’s most engaged member base. About a third of negative posters made redemptions after they posted their commentary. The study ex- amined the downstream activity of Collec- tors who made redemptions after the negative comments were posted. The nega- tive posters who redeemed exhibited a lift of 36% in collection activity over the level be- fore the announcements. That compared to a 21% increase from redeemers within the Control Group over the same time period. The catalyst? Heightened engagement. The announcements and the resulting Negative WOM com- mentary appear to have acted as a reminder, placing the program at the forefront of the negative posters’ minds. By redeeming, these Collectors were further reminded of the value they extracted from the program, leading to increased activity. The reasons members had established their relationship with the brand in the first place had been highlighted, and these more-valuable customers responded. During periods of Negative WOM the temperature of commentary will reach a threshold at which your company feels compelled to craft responses, as appropriate, that lead the conversation back to the brand’s core benefits. In this case, AIR MILES responded by monitoring customer comments, pro- viding answers to specific questions and addressing rumors or inaccuracies as they were expressed. With careful management, Negative WOM can prove a positive boost for engagement, but only if mediated by a simultaneous positive experience linked to the pro- gram’s core value proposition. page 5 Source: 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study Control Gr oup LIFT 21% Negative W OMRedeemers LIFT 36% Redemptions Fuel Transaction Lift Experiencing value inspires heightened activity from the most passionate customers, as demonstrated in the AIR MILES Reward Program study. Source: 2013 LoyaltyOne Social Media Transaction Impact Study The combination of angry words and threats to leave the program inflicted this impact on downstream purchase frequency in the AIR MILES Reward Program study: The Impact of the “Hot-Negative” Social Media Poster 12% Miles Accumulated Purchase Frequency 34%
  • 7. www.loyalty.com Taking the Temperature of WOM The 2013 LoyaltyOne Social MediaTransaction Impact Study also revealed the different “temperatures” of Negative WOM. Some customers may say they are disappointed or confused by changes in a program (or simply have questions), while others will express anger and possibly threaten to leave (what we call a “Hot-Negative” response). Angry customers may create short-term storm clouds, but brands must separate that from the potential long-term damage created by ignoring or mis- handling an angry poster. Brands should concentrate their efforts on the vocal commentators. In the study sample, 64% of the posters expressed anger, and over half of them threatened to quit the program. The combination of “anger” plus “intention to exit” created a 34% decrease in such posters’ subsequent reward miles accumulated, and a 12% decrease in purchase frequency, adjusted for seasonality. Other combinations of emotions, such as “disappointment” plus “intention to exit,” and “concern/ confusion/surprise” plus “intention to exit” didn’t have a statistically significant impact on behavior. Therefore, “Hot-Negative” comments, coupled with a stated intention to exit, are where marketing interventions should focus. Keeping the passion positive Of course, loyalty programs want and need passionate members. But with any relationship, emotion doesn’t always flow in a favorable direction. Programs must attentively monitor the relationship with an eye to keeping it positive, particularly when implementing program change. Madvocacy is damaging to the business in the short term. Negative WOM in this socially-connected age is a reality no brand can afford to ignore. While the best remedy may be prevention, a strategy of service recovery is required. Consider these recommendations. Use the data. Analyze transactions, redemptions and social media traffic data from both posters and viewers during and after any period provoking Negative WOM. If there is a brief impact followed by a quick return to nor- mal levels – as there might be with a small change like a price increase – further action is likely unwarranted. While customer disappointment over a change, service issue or another matter may compel a company to react beyond normal customer commu- nications, that’s not always appropriate, effective or even necessary. page 6 •••
  • 8. www.loyalty.com Take action if the social media “buzz” and sales indicate a more negative customer sentiment. Prepare a targeted recovery plan for when Negative WOM strikes. Employ communications strategies that emphasize the value that both parties receive from the relationship. For example, express appre- ciation, and promote positive program incentives and features such as redemption in order to counter negative commentary. Be swift and sincere in your response. Recognize Negative WOM posters’ opinions and remind them of the benefits they derive from being members of your program to maximize the potential of critical posters remaining en- gaged at high levels, and increasing future transactional behavior. React in a non-confrontational manner to reassure posters and viewers alike that the brand cares about customer opinion. Go public. Angry customers can become better customers downstream if they continue to experience the benefits provided by the brand. Yet, ex- pressions of anger and intent to exit may not only signal lower future pur- chase behavior by those posting messages, but can also precede dampened transaction activity for the viewers of such messages. Therefore, we recommend publicly re- sponding, through the same social media channels, to ensure that the positive changes are noticed by the same viewers of the negative posts. Ultimately, a good starting point for your reaction plan is to focus on what makes members loyal to a program in the first place – and doing so publicly. As with personal relationships, arguing is not fun, but making up is. Conclusion: Be positively engaged Nobody likes to hear negative comments, but those comments don’t necessarily have a negative impact on your business. Even a company’s most outspoken critics have passion for the brand, and their activity can actually be proof of high customer engagement. Understanding the source of criticism, focusing on the “temperature” of the comments, and preparing a strategy for recovery can spur surprisingly positive consumer behaviors from even the most bitter grumblers. To gain timely insight into this and other important loyalty topics, sign up for the LoyaltyOne INSIDER www. loyalty.com/e-newsletter page 7 ••• ••• •••
  • 9. www.loyalty.com Appendix: Methodology LoyaltyOne worked with a team of researchers and linguistic analysts from Northwestern University’s Medill IMC Spiegel Research Initiative. The analysts examined the actual posting experience of 76 indi- viduals who posted 110 separate comments which were viewed by 1,094 other unique Collectors. The team categorized every post by the emotional tone and nature of its content, separating questions from statements and measuring emotions such as “Anger,” “Confusion,” and “Concern.” They also recorded whether a Collector had posted, viewed posts, or both. Linking each posting and viewing event back to each Collector’s transaction and redemption data, the analysts compared behaviors in the four weeks before and eleven weeks after the announcements against a control group of 10,000 offline Collectors over the same period. This information was collected only from a sub-set of Collectors who had granted permission to the company to track their social media behavior there. page 8
  • 10. ABOUT The Author Neil Everett is Chief Marketing Officer of LoyaltyOne. He is responsible for all aspects of marketing the AIR MILES Reward Program, including brand management, marketing strategy, and communications, encompassing mass and integrated marketing as well as emerging channels such as mobile and social, rewards strategy, procurement and fulfillment. His focus as CMO is on growing and evolving consumer engagement to ensure the continued leadership of North America’s premier coalition loyalty program. Everett also leads SquareKnot, a full-service integrated marketing agency under the LoyaltyOne umbrella. ABOUT LoyaltyOne LoyaltyOne is a global leader in the design and implementation of coalition loyalty programs, customer analytics and loyalty management solutions for Fortune 1000 clients around the world. LoyaltyOne’s unparalleled track record in the loyalty marketplace stems from its unique combination of pragmatic, hands-on experience and continuous thought leadership. LoyaltyOne has over 20 years’ history lever- aging data-driven insights to develop and operate some of the world’s most effective loyalty programs and customer-centric solutions. These include the AIR MILES Reward Program, North America’s premier coalition loyalty program and a working partnership with Latin America’s leading coalition program, dotz. LoyaltyOne is also the owner of COLLOQUY, a group dedicated to research, publishing and educa- tion for the global loyalty industry. LoyaltyOne is an Alliance Data company. For more information, visit www.loyalty.com. www.loyalty.com linkedin.com/company/LoyaltyOne @LoyaltyOneInc facebook.com/LoyaltyOneInc Connect with LoyaltyOne page 9