Data sharing and analytics in research and learning

Data sharing and analytics in research
and learning
Chair: Professor Martin Hall
14/07/2016
1

Introduction
Professor Martin Hall
14/07/2016

Learning analytics: progress and solutions
Niall Sclater and MichaelWebb, Jisc
14/07/2016

Learning analytics
Progess & Solutions
Niall Sclater & MichaelWebb, Jisc
@sclater @michaeldwebb
06/07/2016 Learning analytics: progress & solutions 4

“learning analytics is the measurement,
collection, analysis and reporting of data
about learners and their contexts, for
purposes of understanding and optimising
learning and the environments in which it
occurs”
SoLAR – Society for Learning Analytics Research

» Problems identified in 2nd week of semester
» Interventions include:
› Posting signal on student’s home page
› Emailing or texting them
› Arranging a meeting
» Courses that deploy signals see consistently
better grades
» Students on Signals sought help earlier and more
frequently
Early alert and student success

Recommender systems
Desire2Learn Degree Compass

Adaptive learning
The Brightspace LeaP adaptive learning engine

Curriculum design
» A key piece of learning content is not being accessed by most
students
» Some students are not participating well in collaborative work
» A particular minority group is underperforming in an aspect of
the curriculum
» Students across several discussion groups are making only
minimal contributions to their forums

» Total hits is strongest predictor of success
» Assessment activity hits is second
» Metrics relating to current effort (espVLE
usage) are much better predictors of
success than historical or demographic
data.
(John Whitmer)
California State University - Chico

“a student with average intelligence who
works hard is just as likely to get a good grade
as a student that has above-average
intelligence but does not exert any effort”
(Pistilli & Arnold, 2010)

» Predictive early alert model transferred to different institutions
» Around 75% of at-risk students were identified
» Most significant predictors were:
› Marks on course so far
› GPA
› Current academic standing
(Jayaprakesh et al.)
Marist College, NewYork

Retention in England
» 178,100 students aged 16-18 failed to finish post-secondary school qualifications
they started in the 2012/13 academic year
› costing £814 million a year - 12 per cent of all government spending on post-16
education and skills (Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion)
» 8% of undergraduates drop out in their first year of study
› This costs universities around £33,000 per student
» students with 340 UCAS points or above were considerably less likely (4%) than
those with fewer UCAS points (9%) to leave their courses without their award

Attainment in England
» 70% of students reporting a parent with HE qualifications
achieved an upper degree, as against 64% of students
reporting no parent with HE qualifications
» Overall, 70% ofWhite students and 52% of BME students
achieved an upper degree

Jisc Effective Learning Analytics project
» Expressions of interested: 85+
» Engaged in activity: 35
» Discovery to Sept 16: agreed (28), completed (18), reported (11)
» Learning Analytics Pre-Implementation: (12)
» Learning Analytics Implementation: (7)

Effective learning analytics programme
16
ECAR Analytics Maturity Index for Higher Education
UK Learning Analytics Network
analytics@jiscmail.ac.uk
06/07/2016 Learning analytics: progress & solutions

Group Name Question Main type Importance Responsibility
2 Consent Adverse impact of opting
out on individual
If a student is allowed to opt out of data collection and
analysis could this have a negative impact on their
academic progress?
Ethical 1 Analytics Committee
7 Action Conflict with study goals What should a student do if the suggestions are in conflict
with their study goals?
Ethical 3 Student
8 Adverse impact Oversimplification How can institutions avoid overly simplistic metrics and
decision making which ignore personal circumstances?
Ethical 1 Educational researcher
86 issues in 9 groups
Available from Effective learning analytics blog: analytics.jiscinvolve.org

Group Name Question Main type Importance Responsibility
2 Consent Adverse impact of opting
out on individual
If a student is allowed to opt out of data collection and
analysis could this have a negative impact on their
academic progress?
Ethical 1 Analytics Committee
7 Action Conflict with study goals What should a student do if the suggestions are in conflict
with their study goals?
Ethical 3 Student
8 Adverse impact Oversimplification How can institutions avoid overly simplistic metrics and
decision making which ignore personal circumstances?
Ethical 1 Educational researcher
86 issues
jisc.ac.uk/guides/code-of-practice-for-learning-analytics

Times Higher, 25 Feb. 2016

21
Discovery Phase

Implementation process
5.
Implementation
Support
4. Signed-up for
Service
3. Institutional
Readiness
2. Self-
assessment
1. Workshop
»2016 - 17

Discovery readiness questionnaire
• Culture andVision
• Strategy and Investment
• Structure and governance
• Technology and data
• Skills

Guidelines / checklist
Culture and Organisation Setup
 Decide on institutional aims for learning
analytics
 Senior management approval and you have
a nominated project lead
 Undertake the readiness assessment
 Decision on learning analytics products to
pilot
 Legal and ethical considerations in hand
 Address readiness recommendations
 Data processing agreement signed
 Select student groups for the pilot and
engage staff/students
Technical setup
 Learning records warehouse setup
 Extract student data to UDD and upload to
LRW
 Historical data extracted from theVLE and
SRS and uploaded to the LRW
 VLE plugin installed and live data being
uploaded
 View in data explorer to check valid
 Contact Jisc to start implementation

25
Architecture

Project partners

Learning Analytics architecture

Unified data definitions

Service: Dashboards
Visual tools to allow lecturers, module
leaders, senior staff and support staff
to view:
» student engagement
» cohort comparisons
» etc…
Based on either commercial tools from
Tribal (Student Insight) or open source
toolsfromUnicon/Marist(OpenDashBoard)

Service: Alert and intervention system
Tools to allow management of
interactions with students once risk
has been identified:
» case management
» intervention management
» data fed back into model
» etc…
Based on open source tools from
Unicon/Marist (Student Success Plan)

Service: Student App
» Comparative
» Social
» Gameified
» Private by default
» Usable standalone
» Uncluttered

jisc.ac.uk
Michael Webb
michael.webb@jisc.ac.uk
@michaeldwebb
analytics.jiscinvolve.org
Niall Sclater
niall.sclater@jisc.ac.uk
@sclater

Reading analytics
Clifford Lynch,CNI
14/07/2016

Sharing data safely and its re-use for analytics
David Fergusson,The Francis Crick Institute
14/07/2016

The Francis Crick Institute
Sharing Data Safely and
re-use for analytics
David Fergusson

Challenges for ”big data” science in the UK
Distributed Data Sets
Distributed computing resources
Separate authentication/authorization mechanisms
Researchers want to combine and synthesise data
How do we do this?
45

Example
Dr David Fergusson,
Head of Scientific Computing,
Francis Crick Institute
Challenges of providing shared platforms
for staff from existing institutes
– CRUK London Research Institute
– National Institute for Medical Research
Compute and data requirements for 1,250 scientists
working in biomed
– In a central London building
Direction of travel towards more and wider
collaboration, requirement for controlled sharing of
sensitive data 46
Photo credit: Francis Crick Institute

Example
47
Dr Jeremy Yates, STFC DiRAC & SKA:
› The National e-Infrastructure for research & innovation
– A 60,000 foot view
– Democratisation & Aggiornamento
› Moving to a more cloud-centric view of
scientific computing
› Scientific computing that is not just “HPC”
› Changing the culture around Research
Software Engineering
› Making industrial access to facilities the norm
› Inter-disciplinary science – blockers and enablers
Image credit: Courtesy of EPSRC

Addressing the problem
SafeShare – shared secure authorisation/authentication
Shared Data Centre(s) – avoid costly/insecure moving of data
eMedlab – collaborative science/shared operations model
48

UK e-Infrastructure
A new bottom up approach
49

People’s National eInfrastructure
Uganda
Medical
Bioinformati
cs
Business and
local
government
ESRC £64M
MRC £120M
SECURE

What has worked?
Consolidation through collaboration
Swansea: One system supporting Farr Wales, ADRC Wales, MRC CLIMB,
Dementia Platform UK
Scotland: EPCC supporting Farr Scotland and ADRC Scotland, leveraging
expertise from Archer, UK-RDF
Leeds: ARC supporting Farr HeRC, Leeds Med Bio, Consumer Data RC
Slough DC: eMedLab, Imperial Med Bio, KCL bio cluster
Jisc network: Safe Share

John Chapman, Deputy head, information security, Jisc
The safe share project

About Jisc » Assent
Assent:
Single, unifying technology that enables
you to effectively manage and control
access to a wide range of web and non-
web services and applications.
These include cloud infrastructures,
High Performance Computing, Grid
Computing and commonly deployed
services such as email, file store,
remote access and instant messaging
54

About Jisc » Safe Share
Safe Share:
Providing and building services on
encrypted VPN infrastructure between
organisations
Enhanced confidentiality and integrity
requirements per ISO27001
Requirement to move electronic health
data securely and support research
collaboration
Working with biomedical researchers at
Farr Institute, MRC Medical Bioinformatics
initiative, ESRC Administrative Data
Centres 55

The safe share project 56
• What: a pilot project enabling the secure exchange of data collected by
Government and the NHS using an encrypted overlay over the Janet
network to facilitate appropriate analysis between project sites
•
• AND reusing existing services to increase authentication for researchers
• Why: easier, secure access to research data to further knowledge of diseases
and ill health to improve medical treatments in the long-term
• When: running from November 2014 – March 2017

Background
• Substantial investment in medical and administrative data research to
generate benefits to society from the appropriate analysis of data collected
by Government and the NHS
• E.g. to further knowledge e.g. of disease and ill health to improve medical
treatments
Challenges
• Health data, and other routinely collected data on people’s lives, are very
personal and sensitive
• Significant numbers of ethical, consensual and practical hurdles to making
appropriate use of the sensitive data for research

Drivers
• Requirement for connectivity to move and access electronic health data
securely
• Challenge to give public confidence that data is appropriately protected
• Provide economies of scale in secure connectivity
• Jisc management and funding of £960k to pilot potential solutions with the
aim of developing a service in 2016/17

Partners
University of
Bristol
Cardiff University
University of Leeds
Swansea University
University of
Edinburgh
UCL
University of
Oxford
University of
Southampton
University of
Manchester
St Andrews University
The Farr Institute The MRC Medical Bioinformatics initiative
The Administrative Data Research Network
University of Bristol
Cardiff University
University of Edinburgh
University of Leeds
UCL
University of Manchester
University of Oxford
University of St Andrews
University of Southampton
Swansea University

Authentication, Authorisation and Accounting Infrastructure (AAAI)
Use Cases:
• HeRC, N8 HPC – access between facilities using home institution
credentials
• eMedLab – partners will be able to use a common AAAI to access this new
system (for analysis of for instance human genome data, medical images,
clinical, psychological and social data)
• Swansea University Health Informatics Group – investigating Moonshot as an
authentication mechanism to allow use of home institution credentials
• University of Oxford: to enable researchers to use home institution
credentials for authentication to request access to datasets for studies e.g.

Example “service slice”: Farr
Institution LAN
Safe share
core
Janet,
internet or
other
network
Farr trusted
environments
safe share router at edge

Example “service slice”: Farr
Institution LAN
Farr trusted
environments
Janet,
internet or
other
network
safe share router at edge
Safe share
core

UK Academic
Shared Data Centre
63

Shared data centre
£900K investment from HEFCE
Anchor tenants:
– Francis Crick Institute
– King’s College London
– London School of Economics
– Queen Mary University of London
– Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
– University College London 64

Potential cost-saving/resource benefits
Jisc Shared Datacentre is already a cost saving
eMedLab award, and need for quick spend, gave impetus to UCL, KCL,
QMUL, Sanger, LSE and Crick to identify off-site datacentre hosting (Slough)
– Anchor tenants get price reduction based on volume of space used
Procurement led by Jisc
Datacentre connected to Janet network (Jisc investment)
Improved PUE; Slough 1.25 cf ~2 for HEI datacentre (UCL save ~£2M p.a.)

Datacentre Connection Topology
N3/PSNH/PSN

eMedLab
Collaborative science
Shared Operation
67

Objectives - Flexibility
• To help generate new insights and clinical outcomes by
combining data from diverse sources and disciplines
• Bring computing workloads to the data, minimising the
need for costly data movements
• To allow customised use of resources
• To enable innovative ways of working collaboratively
• To allow a distributed support model
68

Supportteam
eMedLab academy
• Training via CDFs and courses
• Promote collaborations via “Labs”
eMedLab infrastructure
• Shared computer cluster
• Integrate exchange heterogeneous data
• Methods and insights across diseases

eMedLabis a hub
6+1 partners
3 data types
electronic
health
records
genomic
images
3 expertises
clinician
scientists
analytics
basic
science
3 disease areas
rare
cancer
cardio
>6M patients

Distributed/Federated support
(What has worked/savings ..)
eMedLab
Ops team
(shared team)
Knowledge
sharing/transfer
(inc. developing
UK industrial
capacity –
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support
Support

Many projects, same challenges
Information governance
Secure data transfer
User management
AAAI
Working with Janet to explore how to support most/all projects

Cultural Barriers Challenges
Finance – government funding with spend window of 1 year only
+Mitigated by use of efficient procurement teams and framework
agreements
+Working closely with vendors to ensure tight time targets met
- Drain on (unfunded) project management and finance team resources
Regulatory challenge
+Mitigated by clear policies, governance, supported by training
+Changing EU data protection legislation
- Risk of bad PR and/or data leaks
People
+Everyone is open, collaborative, generous with time and knowledge

eMedLab production service
 Projects
• UCL & WTSI - Enabling Collaborative Medical Genomics Analysis Using Arvados – Javier Herrero
• Crick KCL UCL - A scalable and flexible collaborative eMedLab cancer genomics cluster to share
large-scale datasets and computational resources – Peter van Loo
• UCL QMUL Farr - Creating and exploiting research datamart using i2b2 and novel data-driven
methods - Spiros Denaxas
• LSHTM & QMUL - An evaluation of a genomic analysis tools VM on the EMedLab, applied to
infectious disease projects at the LSHTM using data from EBI and Sanger & Genetic Analysis of UK
Biobank Data - Taane Clark & Helen Warren
• UCL & ICH - The HIGH-5 Programme - High definition, in-depth phenotyping at GOSH, plus related
projects - Phil Beales & Hywel Williams & Chela James

eMedLabenables
projects
eMedLab brings data and expertise
together across diseases
(potential)
• Mechanisms of cancer diversity and genome instability
• Better understanding of biomarkers
• DARWIN Clinical Trial to target clonal drivers
Cancer evolution and heterogeneity (Swanton & Van Loo)
• Cancers evolve heterogeneously
• Diverse driver mutations and instability mechanisms
• TracerX: Track lung cancer evolution
• Data: genomes, MRI, molecular pathology
• Who: clinicians, statisticians, evolutionary biologists

People
Alan Real, Bob Day, Bruno Silva, Clare Gryce, David Fergusson, Emily
Jefferson, Jacky Pallas, Jeremy Sharp, John Ainsworth, John Chapman,
Jonathan Monk, Mark Parsons, Ric Passey, Richard Christie, Rhys Smith,
Simon Thompson, Simon Thompson, Spiros Denaxas, Stephen
Newhouse, Steve Pavis, Tanvi Desai, Tim Cutts and others …........

Thank you for reading the information within
this document; you have now reached the
end.
79

Data sharing and analytics in research
and learning
Chair: Phil Richards, Jisc
14/07/2016
80

Data sharing and analytics in research and learning

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Destaque

Destaque (7)

Semelhante a Data sharing and analytics in research and learning

Semelhante a Data sharing and analytics in research and learning (20)

Mais de Jisc

Mais de Jisc (20)

Último

Último (20)

Data sharing and analytics in research and learning

Notas do Editor