SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 6
Baixar para ler offline
DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 41
International Reporting
Penalties—What to Expect
and How to Fight Them
By Igor S. Drabkin
Igor Drabkin examines the international
reporting penalties. His article focuses on the
FBAR and IRS Forms 8938, 3520, 3520-A and
the reasonable cause defense to them.
U
.S. taxpayers are required to report their worldwide income. U.S. filing
requirements include various and significant reporting requirements with
respect to U.S. taxpayer’s interest in certain foreign financial assets, foreign
bank accounts, foreign partnerships, foreign corporations and foreign trusts. Heavy
penalties,civilandcriminal,canbeimposedonthosetaxpayerswhofailtofilerequired
information returns, or file them inaccurately or late. What are the penalties that can
apply for noncompliance with international reporting? And how to defend them?
A. FBAR Penalties
Under the Bank Secrecy Act, each U.S. person must file FinCen Form104, Report
of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), if:
the person has a financial interest in, or signature authority (or other author-
ity that is comparable to signature authority) over one or more accounts in
a foreign country, and
the aggregate value of all foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any
time during the calendar year.
A U.S. person is not prohibited from owning foreign accounts; however, sig-
nificant civil and criminal penalties may apply for failures to properly file FBARs
when required.1
Criminal penalties for FBAR violations can result in a fine of $250,000 and
five years of imprisonment.2
If the FBAR violation occurs while violating another
law (such as another tax law, which is often a case) the penalties can be increased
to $500,000 in fines and 10 years of imprisonment.3
©2015 I.S. DRABKIN
IGOR S. DRABKIN is an Attorney and a
Principal with Holtz, Slavett & Drabkin,
APLC in Beverly Hills, California.
bank a
penalti
inform
r
co
s,
atio
pe
unts,
vil
n retu
foreign
ndcrim
rns o
partn
na
fil
ershi
nbe
hem i
rest in c
oreign
osedon
urately o
ert
rp
ho
r la
ns
pa
ra
et
e Wha
and foreign
rswhofai
re the p
trusts.
tofilere
alties t
Heav
qu
at
CCH Draft
JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015
42
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING PENALTIES
In addition to the possible criminal penalties, the BSA
imposes substantial civil penalties for violation of the
FBAR rules.4
The amount of the civil penalty imposed for the FBAR
violations depends on the type of the violation, i.e.,
whether such violation is willful or not. Failing to file an
FBAR can carry a civil penalty of $10,000 for each non-
willful violation.5
However, if the FBAR violation is found
to be willful, the penalty can be the greater of $100,000
or 50 percent of the balance in the account at the time
of the violation.6
Moreover, the FBAR penalty applies for each viola-
tion, i.e., the penalty can be imposed with respect to
each unreported account for multiple years. The statute
of limitations for assessment of the FBAR penalties is six
years from the due date of the return.7
In the recent case of C.R. Zwerner in the U.S. District
Court, S. D. of Florida,8
the Jury determined that the
taxpayer was liable for multiple FBAR penalties, agreeing
with the government assessment of 50-percent penalties
for three years, resulting in the FBAR penalty equal to
practically 150 percent of the account balance. FBAR
penalties totaled $2,241,809 with respect to an offshore
account that had a high balance of $1,691,054. After the
jury verdict, the taxpayer raised an argument under the
8th Amendment, arguing that such a penalty represented
an Excessive Fine. This legal issue remains unresolved,
however, as the parties in Zwerner settled without the
District Court ruling on the constitutional question.
InternalRevenueManual4.26.16.4.5.3statesthatthetest
for willfulness is whether there was a voluntary, intentional
violation of a known legal duty. A finding of willfulness un-
der the BSA must be supported by evidence of willfulness.
The burden of establishing willfulness is on the IRS. If it is
determined that the violation was due to reasonable cause,
the willfulness penalty should not be asserted.
Further, willfulness is shown by the person’s knowledge
of the reporting requirements and the person’s conscious
choice not to comply with the requirements. In the FBAR
situation, the only thing that a person need know is that he
has a reporting requirement. If a person has that knowledge,
the only intent needed to constitute a willful violation of
the requirement is a conscious choice not to file the FBAR.
Under the concept of “willful blindness,” willfulness may be
attributed to a person who has made a conscious effort to
avoidlearningabouttheFBARreportingandrecordkeeping
requirements.Willfulness can rarely be proven by direct evi-
dence, since it is a state of mind. It is usually established by
drawing a reasonable inference from the available facts. The
government may base a determination of willfulness in the
failure to file the FBAR on inference from conduct meant
to conceal sources of income or other financial information.
For FBAR purposes, this could include concealing signature
authority, interests in various transactions, and interests in
entities transferring cash to foreign banks.
Chart 1 summarizes the civil and criminal penalties
that may be asserted for not complying with the FBAR
reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
CHART 1.*
Violation Civil Penalties Criminal Penalties Comments
Negligent Violation Up to $500 N/A 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(6)(A)
31 C.F.R. 103.57(h).
Non-Willful Violation Up to $10,000 for each negligent violation N/A 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5)(B)
Pattern of Negligent Activity In addition to penalty under Code Sec.
5321(a)(6)(A) with respect to any such
violation, not more than $50,000
N/A 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(6)(B)
Willful—Failure to File FBAR
or retain records of account
Up to the greater of $100,000, or 50
percent of the amount in the account at
the time of the violation.
Up to $250,000 or
five years or both
31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5)(C)
31 U.S.C. § 5322(a)
and 31 C.F.R. § 103.59(b) for criminal.
The penalty applies to all U.S. persons.
Willful—Failure to File FBAR
or retain records of account
while violating certain other
laws
Up to the greater of $100,000, or 50
percent of the amount in the account at
the time of the violation.
Up to $500,000 or
10 years or both
31 U.S.C. § 5322(b) and 31 C.F.R. §
103.59(c) for criminal
The penalty applies to all U.S. persons.
Knowingly and Willfully
Filing False FBAR
Up to the greater of $100,000, or 50
percent of the amount in the account at
the time of the violation.
$10,000 or 5 years
or both
18 U.S.C. § 1001,
31 C.F.R. § 103.59(d) for criminal. The
penalty applies to all U.S. persons.
*Civil and Criminal Penalties may be imposed together. 31 U.S.C. § 5321(d).
in Zwerner se
the constitutional qu
ith
es
u
ion. reporting
asserted
reco
fo
ke re
in quirements.
Ame
E
men
Fi
endm
i
ART
T 1.*
ne.
pa
par
ulin
n E
ow
how
Dist
Exce
wever
wever
trict
ssive
r, as
r, as
Cou
e Fin
the
the
urt ru
CCH Draft
DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 43
The IRS has developed and adopted Mitigation Guide-
lines for FBAR penalties, which provides a tiered approach
to the penalties and can provide some relief to taxpayers
with smaller accounts.9
The Internal Revenue Manual
directs that “... examiners are to use discretion, taking
into account the facts and circumstances of each case, in
determining whether a warning letter or penalties that are
less than the total amounts provided for in the mitigation
guidelines are appropriate.”10
The IRM reminds examiners
that “[t]he sole purpose for the FBAR penalties is to serve
as a tool to promote compliance with respect to the FBAR
reporting and recordkeeping requirements.”11
IRM Exhibit 4.26.16-2 establishes various levels of
the penalties, based on the balance in the accounts.
See Chart 2.
FBAR penalties may be waived for “reasonable cause.”
Internal Revenue Manual 4.26.16.4 provides that the
IRS is supposed to use reasonable cause and good faith
exception standards developed under Code Sec. 6662 and
Reg. §1.6664-4.
CHART 2.*
Non-Willful (NW) Penalties
To qualify for Level I-NW,
determine aggregate
balances
If the maximum aggregate balance for all accounts to which the violations relate did not exceed $50,000
at any time during the year, Level I – NW applies to all violations. Determine the maximum balance at any
time during the calendar year for each account. Add the individual maximum balances to find the maximum
aggregate balance.
Level I-NW Penalty is $500 for each violation, not to exceed an aggregate penalty of $5,000 for all violations.
To qualify for Level II-NW,
determine account balance
If Level I-NW does not apply and if the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at
any time during the calendar year did not exceed $250,000, Level II-NW applies to that account.
Level II-NW penalty is $5,000 for each Level II-NW account violation, not to exceed 10 percent of the maximum balance in the
account during the year
To qualify for Level III-NW If Level I-NW does not apply and if the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at
any time during the calendar year was more than $250,000, Level III-NW applies to that account.
Level III-NW is $10,000 for each Level III-NW account violation, the statutory maximum for non-willful violations.
Willfulness Penalties
To qualify for Level I,
determine aggregate
balances
If the maximum aggregate balance for all accounts to which the violations relate did not exceed $50,000,
Level I applies to all accounts. Determine the maximum balance at any time during the calendar year for
each account. Add the individual maximum balances to find the maximum aggregate balance.
Level I penalty is The greater of $1,000 per violation or five percent of the maximum balance during the year of the account
to which the violations relate for each violation.
To qualify for Level II,
determine account balance
If Level I does not apply and if the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any
time during the calendar year did not exceed $250,000, Level II applies to that account.
Level II penalty is per
account
The greater of $5,000 per violation or 10 percent of the maximum balance during the calendar year for each
Level II account.
To Qualify for Level III If the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any time during the calendar year
exceeded $250,000 but did not exceed $1 million, Level III applies to that account.
Level III penalty is per
account.
The greater of (a) or (b):
(a) 10 percent of the maximum balance during the calendar year for each Level III account, or
(b) 50 percent of the closing balance in the account as of the last day for filing the FBAR.
To qualify for Level IV If the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any time during the calendar year
exceeded $1 million, Level IV, the statutory maximum, applies to that account.
Level IV penalty is per
account the statutory
maximum
The greater of (a) or (b):
(a) $100,000, or
(b) 50 percent of the closing balance in the account as of the last day for filing the FBAR.
* Exhibit 4.26.16-2 (07-01-2008), Normal FBAR Penalty MitigationGuidelines forViolationsOccurring AfterOctober 22, 2004 (available at
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-026-016.html#d0e529).
ea
00
If the maxim
evel I app
m aggre
to all ac
II
at
oun
Willf
al
s. De
ulness
ce for al
termine
enalt
ac
h
ies
nts to
aximu
tory max
h the v
lance at
m
at
ny
at
ns
me dur
xce
not e
did
the cale
ed $50,0
ar year
00
or
g g
ances
g
s
l I,
ate
To
et
Lev
vel III-
qualif
termin
-NW i
fy for
ne ag
is
Level
grega
CCH Draft
JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015
44
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING PENALTIES
B. Information Return of U.S.
Persons with Respect to Certain
Foreign Corporations (Form 5471)
and Certain Foreign Partnerships
(Form 8865)
U.S. citizens and U.S. residents who are officers, direc-
tors, or shareholders in certain foreign corporations are
responsible for filing Form 5471, Information Return of
U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corpora-
tions. Form 5471 is due with the timely filed income tax
return of the affected individual, including the extensions.
Penalties for failure to file Form 5471 information
return is established by Code Sec. 6038(a). The penalty
with respect to Form 5471 equals to $10,000 for each
annual accounting period of each foreign corporation
for failure to furnish the required information within
the time prescribed.12
Furthermore, additional penalties
apply if the information is not provided by the taxpayer
within 90 days of the notification by the IRS that such
information is required.13
A $10,000 penalty (per foreign
corporation) is charged for each 30-day period, or fraction
thereof, during which the failure continues after the 90-
day period has expired. This additional penalty is limited
to a maximum of $50,000 for each failure.14
The penalty may be abated for reasonable cause.15
To
show that reasonable cause exists, the person required to
report such information must have filed for all open years
(not on extension) and must make an affirmative showing
of all facts alleged as reasonable cause for such failure in a
written statement. For failure to file Form 5471, the writ-
ten statement must contain a declaration that it is made
under the penalties of perjury.16
Reasonable cause defense,
however, does not apply to the continuation penalty.
In addition, failure to file Form 5471 or incomplete
forms may result in the reduction of foreign tax credits.
Any person who fails to file or report all information
required within the time prescribed will be subject to
a 10 percent reduction of the foreign taxes available for
credit under Code Secs. 901, 902 and 960. If the failure
continues 90 days or more after the date that the IRS
mails notice, an additional five-percent reduction is made
for each three-month period, or fraction thereof, during
which the failure continues.17
Beginning in 2008, the IRS began automatic assessment
of penalties under Code Sec. 6038(b)(1).
Additional penalties may apply for failure of U.S. per-
sons to report transfer of property in excess of $100,000
to a foreign corporation.18
The penalty is 10 percent of the
asset value for nonintentional violations, up to $100,000,
with no limitation for intentional valuations.19
Similar
penalties applied for U.S. persons who fail to report certain
interests, transfers, acquisitions and disposition in foreign
partnerships, which need to be reported on Form 8865.20
C. Statement of Specified Foreign
Financial Assets (Form 8938)
Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial As-
sets, became required beginning with the tax year 2011
under the terms of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance
Act (FATCA). Certain U.S. taxpayers holding financial
assets outside the United States must report those assets
to the IRS, using Form 8938.21
In summary, Form 8938
should be filed by those taxpayers whose specified foreign
financial assets are more than $50,000 (for single or mar-
ried filing separate) or $100,000 (if married and filing
jointly) at the end of the year, or exceed $75,000 (single
or married, filing separate), or $150,000 (married, filing
jointly) at any time during the year.22
These thresholds are
higher for individuals residing abroad.
“Specified foreign financial assets” include financial ac-
counts (e.g., bank accounts, mutual funds, hedge funds,
private equity funds) that are maintained by a foreign
financial institution including financial institutions that
are organized under the laws of a U.S. possession; stocks
or securities issued by foreign persons; any other financial
instrument or contract held for investment that is issued
by foreign person or has a foreign person as a counterparty;
and any interest in a foreign entity.23
Taxpayers may be subject to penalties if they fail to
timely file a correct Form 8938 or if there is an understate-
ment of tax relating to an undisclosed specified foreign
financial asset.
A failure to file a complete and correct Form 8938 by
the due date (including applicable extensions), you may
be subject to a penalty of $10,000.24
If a taxpayer does not
In determining whether the
“reasonable cause” defense exists,
taxpayers and their representatives
need to review all the relevant facts
and circumstances.
Code Sec. 603
71 equals to
d of each
required
$10,00
reign c
forma
The
0
or
on
en
for ea
ra
with
ch
on
n
shou
fi
ri
uld be
cial
filin
g Fo
in
d by
s are m
parate)
m
se
re
or $
ye
$5
ax
ha
100 00
s whose spe
,000 (for
(if ma
cified f
ingle o
d and
oreig
r m
fi
l f f
i f
o fur
failu
ure to
fai
hed
ng
rn
hed
For
nn
r
Pe
etu
etu
with
enalt
urn is
urn is
h res
nual a
failu
ties f
s esta
s esta
pect
acco
ure to
for f
ablish
ablish
to F
untin
o fur
pe
sh
p
h
CCH Draft
DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 45
file a correct and complete Form 8938 within 90 days after
the IRS mails a notice of the failure to file, such taxpayer
may be subject to an additional penalty of $10,000 for
each 30-day period (or part of a period) during which
you continue to fail to file Form 8938 after the 90-day
period has expired. The maximum additional penalty for
a continuing failure to file Form 8938 is $50,000.25
In addition, underpayment of tax as a result of a transac-
tion involving an undisclosed specified foreign financial
asset, may be subject to a penalty equal to 40 percent of
that underpayment.26
The IRS provides the following examples of underpay-
ments due to transactions involving an undisclosed speci-
fied foreign financial assets:
Taxpayer does not report ownership of shares in a
foreign corporation on Form 8938 and Taxpayer
received tax distributions from the company that you
did not report on your income tax return.
Taxpayer does not report ownership of shares in a
foreign company on Form 8938 and Taxpayer sold
the shares in the company for a gain, failing to report
the gain on income tax return.
Taxpayer does not report a foreign pension on Form
8938 and Taxpayer received a taxable distribution
from the pension plan that Taxpayer did not report
on your income tax return.
If underpayment of tax is due to fraud, Taxpayer
must pay a penalty of 75 percent of the underpayment
due to fraud.27
Reasonable cause exception also applies to Form 8938
violations.28
If the failure to report the information
required in Code Sec. 6038D(c) and Temporary Reg.
§1.6038D-4Tis shown to be due to reasonable cause and
not due to willful neglect, no penalty will be imposed
under Code Sec. 6038D(d) or this section.29
Form 8938 also has a “Duplicative Reporting” excep-
tion.30
If Specified Foreign Financial Assets are reported
on one or more of following forms for same tax year, then
the taxpayer does not have to report them on Form 8938:
Form 3520, Annual Return to ReportTransactionsWith
Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts
Form 5471, Information Return by a Shareholder of
a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified
Electing Fund
Form 8865, Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to
Certain Foreign Partnerships
Form 8891, U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries
of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement Plans
However, in order for the exception to apply, Form
8938 must identify Form on which SFFA reported, and
quantity of this form filed.
One important change that was effectuated by FATCA
and enactment of Code Sec. 6038D and Form 8938 is
the change to the statute of limitations for assessment
under Code Sec. 6501. Under the new rules, the statute of
limitations is extended to six years after a taxpayer’s return
is filed if the taxpayer omits $5,000 from gross income
attributable to a specified foreign financial asset, without
regard to the reporting threshold or any reporting excep-
tions.31
If the taxpayer fails to file or properly report an
asset on Form 8938, the statute of limitations for the tax
year is extended until the taxpayer provides the required
information.32
If the failure is due to reasonable cause,
the statute of limitations is extended only with regard
to the item or items related to such failure and not the
entire tax year.
D. Form 3520 and Form 3520-A
U.S. taxpayers are required to file information returns
with respect to certain foreign trusts. Failure to file such
information returns, Form 3520 and Form 3520-A, may
be subject to penalties under Code Sec. 6677.
Failure to report transactions involving foreign trusts
on Form 3520 can result in the amount of 35 percent of
the gross value of the distributions received from a foreign
trust or transferred to a foreign trust.33
With respect to fail-
ure to report certain foreign gifts, the penalty is imposed
in the amount of five percent per month, up to 25 percent
of the gift amount.34
Failure to report ownership interests
in a foreign trust with U.S. owner on Form 3520-A can
result in a penalty of $10,000 or four percent of the gross
value of the trusts’ assets.35
Similar to other penalties, Form 3520 and 3520-A pen-
alties may be waived for reasonable cause.36
The fact that
disclosure is a crime in another country is not considered
reasonable cause.
E. Reasonable Cause Defense
As discussed above, most of the penalties related to com-
pliance with foreign accounts and assets can be waived
or abated for reasonable cause. In determining whether
Penalties for failure to comply with
the reporting requirements related
to foreign assets and accounts can be
onerous.
5 percent of t
ion also ap
to rep
plies to
the i
erp
Fo
for
ym
m
mati
38
n
with
in
b
h resp
mati
ubjec
rs are r
o ce
eturns
penaltie
q
n
Fo
s u
n
re
m 352
der C
ilu
s. F
rus
and Form
e Sec 6
re to fi
3520-A
7
e suc
A,
on y
f d
inc
your
d
If t
C
latio
d
ns.
d i
men
alty
use
th
alty
R
ol
If
mu
mu
due
f und
st pa
st pa
e to f
Reaso
latio
derp
ay a p
ay a p
fraud
nabl
ns 28
paym
pena
pena
d.27
le cau
8
If t
ex
e fa
f
CCH Draft
JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015
46
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING PENALTIES
reasonable cause and good faith exists, the IRS will use
standards developed under Code Sec. 6662 and Reg.
§1.6664-4.
An exception to the Code Sec. 6662(a) penalty is set
forth in Code Sec. 6664(c)(1) and reads: “No penalty shall
be imposed under this part with respect to any portion of
an underpayment if it is shown that there was a reason-
able cause for such portion and that the taxpayer acted
in good faith with respect to such portion.” Regulations
interpreting Code Sec. 6664(c) state:
The determination of whether a taxpayer acted with
reasonable cause and in good faith is made on a case-
by-case basis, taking into account all pertinent facts
and circumstances. Generally, the most important
factor is the extent of the taxpayer’s effort to assess the
taxpayer’s proper tax liability. Treas. Regs. §1.6664-
4(b)(1). The determination of whether the taxpayer
acted with reasonable cause and in good faith depends
on the pertinent facts and circumstances, including
the knowledge and experience of the taxpayer and the
reliance on the advice of a professional, such as an
accountant. Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.
In determining whether the “reasonable cause” defense
exists, taxpayers and their representatives need to review
all the relevant facts and circumstances. The following fac-
tors may be helpful in this analysis: good faith; ordinary
care and prudence; reasonable reliance on a professional
advice; first time mistake; sufficient disclosure on return;
education and sophistication of taxpayer; out of ordinary
circumstances, such as death, illness or injury of the tax-
payer, a natural disaster, fire or other emergency.37
F. Conclusion
Penalties for failure to comply with the reporting re-
quirements related to foreign assets and accounts can be
onerous.Taxpayers and tax professionals are encouraged to
familiarize themselves with the rules and requirements im-
posed by the Internal Revenue Code and Bank Secrecy Act
to avoid criminal or civil exposure for lack of compliance.
ENDNOTES
1
31 USC §§5321, 5322.
2
31 USC §5322(a).
3
31 USC §5322.
4
31 USC §5321.
5
31 USC §5321(a)(5)(B).
6
31 USC §5321(a)(5)(C).
7
31 USC §5321(b).
8
C.Zwerner,CivilDocketCase#1:13-cv-22082-CMA.
9
See IRM 4.26.16.4.5 (July 1, 2008).
10
IRM 4.26.16.4.4(3) (July 1, 2008).
11
IRM 4.26.16.4.4(3) (July 1, 2008).
12
Code Sec. 6038(b)(1).
13
Code Sec. 6038(b)(2).
14
Code Sec. 6038(b)(2).
15
Code Sec. 6038(c)(4).
16
IRM 20.1.9.4.5.
17
See Code Sec. 6038(c)(2).
18
Code Sec. 6038B.
19
Code Sec. 6038B(c).
20
Code Secs. 6038, 6038B and 6046A.
21
Code Sec. 6038D.
22
CodeSec.6038D(a);TemporaryReg.§1.6038D-
2T(a)(1).
23
Code Sec. 6038D(b); Temporary Reg.
§§1.6038D-1T(a)(6), 3T(a)(2).
24
Code Sec. 6038D(d)(1).
25
Code Sec. 6038D(d)(2).
26
Code Sec. 6662(j)(3).
27
Code Sec. 6663.
28
Code Sec. 6038D(g).
29
Temporary Reg. §1.6038D-8T.
30
Temporary Reg. §1.6038D-7T(a).
31
Code Sec. 6015(e).
32
Code Sec. 6015(c)(8).
33
Code Sec. 6677(a) and (b).
34
Code Sec. 6039F.
35
Code Secs. 6048(b) and 6677.
36
Code Sec. 6677(d).
37
Reg. §1.6664-4(a) and IRM 20.1.5.6.1.
This article is reprinted with the publisher’s permission from the JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE,
a bi-monthly journal published by CCH, a part of Wolters Kluwer. Copying or distribution without the publisher’s
permission is prohibited. To subscribe to the JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE or other CCH, a part of Wolters Kluwer
Journals please call 800-449-8114 or visit CCHGroup.com. All views expressed in the articles and columns are those of the
author and not necessarily those of CCH, a part of Wolters Kluwer or any other person.
cv-22082-CMA
).
20
C
Co
Co
2T
e S
e S
e S
eS
)(1)
6
cs. 603
6
60
8, 6038
8D.
D(a
and 60
por
046A.
g.§1 D-
30
34
Te
Co
Co
Co
Cod
60
e S
e Sec. 60
e Sec. 66
e Sec 60
5(
5(c)(8).
(a) and (b).
USC § .
§5321
.4(3) (
4(3)
M 4.26
4 26
6.16.4.
6.16.4.
(B)
(C).
(Ju
(Ju
etCa
Se
R
31
31
31
C.Z
USC §
USC §
USC §
Zwerne
ee IRM
M 4 26
§5321
§5321
§5321
er,
r Civil
,
4.26.1
616 4
(a)(5)(
(a)(5)(
(b).
lDocke
16.4.5
4(3) (
y 1,
y 1, 2
y
1
CCH Draft

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impactAlexander Decker
 
LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...
LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...
LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...MrDlamini
 
Combating money laundering & terror financing case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...
Combating money laundering & terror financing  case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...Combating money laundering & terror financing  case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...
Combating money laundering & terror financing case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...cjnsipho
 
Item # 14 Opioid Settlement
Item # 14  Opioid SettlementItem # 14  Opioid Settlement
Item # 14 Opioid Settlementahcitycouncil
 
7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...
7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...
7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...Scueto77
 
Anti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export Transactions
Anti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export TransactionsAnti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export Transactions
Anti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export TransactionsBrenda Swick
 
penology & victim compensation article
penology & victim compensation articlepenology & victim compensation article
penology & victim compensation articleArjun Randhir
 
Item # 14 PPT Opioid Settlement
Item # 14  PPT Opioid SettlementItem # 14  PPT Opioid Settlement
Item # 14 PPT Opioid Settlementahcitycouncil
 
Presentation on POCA Jamaica
Presentation on POCA JamaicaPresentation on POCA Jamaica
Presentation on POCA JamaicaLeadAdvocate
 
Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...
Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...
Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...Igor Ellyn, QC, CS, FCIArb.
 
Madoff attempts to right the wrong
Madoff   attempts to right the wrongMadoff   attempts to right the wrong
Madoff attempts to right the wrongIlene Kent
 
Portfolio Project Family Law
Portfolio Project Family LawPortfolio Project Family Law
Portfolio Project Family LawMadeleine Shore
 

Mais procurados (18)

11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
11.money laundering concept significance and its impact
 
LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...
LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...
LVK liquidators in collusion with Pretoria lawyers to defraud creditors and b...
 
Combating money laundering & terror financing case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...
Combating money laundering & terror financing  case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...Combating money laundering & terror financing  case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...
Combating money laundering & terror financing case of nigeria- adv. chitengi...
 
Article 7
Article 7Article 7
Article 7
 
Item # 14 Opioid Settlement
Item # 14  Opioid SettlementItem # 14  Opioid Settlement
Item # 14 Opioid Settlement
 
Chapter 3: Constitutional Rights
Chapter 3: Constitutional RightsChapter 3: Constitutional Rights
Chapter 3: Constitutional Rights
 
7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...
7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...
7 steps to effectuate international service of process under the hague servic...
 
Plunder law ra_7080
Plunder law ra_7080Plunder law ra_7080
Plunder law ra_7080
 
Anti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export Transactions
Anti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export TransactionsAnti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export Transactions
Anti-Corruption Compliance in Import/Export Transactions
 
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
 
penology & victim compensation article
penology & victim compensation articlepenology & victim compensation article
penology & victim compensation article
 
Item # 14 PPT Opioid Settlement
Item # 14  PPT Opioid SettlementItem # 14  PPT Opioid Settlement
Item # 14 PPT Opioid Settlement
 
Rule 74
Rule 74Rule 74
Rule 74
 
Presentation on POCA Jamaica
Presentation on POCA JamaicaPresentation on POCA Jamaica
Presentation on POCA Jamaica
 
Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...
Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...
Canadian Arbitrator Lacks Jurisdiction to Make Injunction Orders Affecting No...
 
Madoff attempts to right the wrong
Madoff   attempts to right the wrongMadoff   attempts to right the wrong
Madoff attempts to right the wrong
 
Orders and Awards in Arbitration Proceedings
Orders and Awards in Arbitration ProceedingsOrders and Awards in Arbitration Proceedings
Orders and Awards in Arbitration Proceedings
 
Portfolio Project Family Law
Portfolio Project Family LawPortfolio Project Family Law
Portfolio Project Family Law
 

Destaque

Presentacion Alejandra
Presentacion AlejandraPresentacion Alejandra
Presentacion AlejandraDiego Rodrigo
 
Communication in public administration
Communication in public administrationCommunication in public administration
Communication in public administrationYammie Daud
 
Communication in Public Organization
Communication in Public OrganizationCommunication in Public Organization
Communication in Public OrganizationHAFIZUDIN YAHAYA
 
Communication in public administration
Communication in public administrationCommunication in public administration
Communication in public administrationYammie Daud
 
5 barriers to effective communication
5 barriers to effective communication5 barriers to effective communication
5 barriers to effective communicationDiego Rodrigo
 
Ways of overcoming barriers to communication
Ways of overcoming barriers to communicationWays of overcoming barriers to communication
Ways of overcoming barriers to communicationNaturesdream
 
COMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERS
COMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERSCOMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERS
COMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERSSruthi Balaji
 
Barriers to effective communication and ways to overcome them
Barriers to effective communication and ways to overcome themBarriers to effective communication and ways to overcome them
Barriers to effective communication and ways to overcome themRakshit Jain
 

Destaque (10)

Presentacion Alejandra
Presentacion AlejandraPresentacion Alejandra
Presentacion Alejandra
 
Communication for administrative purposes
Communication for administrative purposesCommunication for administrative purposes
Communication for administrative purposes
 
Communication in public administration
Communication in public administrationCommunication in public administration
Communication in public administration
 
Communication in Public Organization
Communication in Public OrganizationCommunication in Public Organization
Communication in Public Organization
 
Communication in public administration
Communication in public administrationCommunication in public administration
Communication in public administration
 
Breaking Barriers To Effective Communication
Breaking Barriers To Effective CommunicationBreaking Barriers To Effective Communication
Breaking Barriers To Effective Communication
 
5 barriers to effective communication
5 barriers to effective communication5 barriers to effective communication
5 barriers to effective communication
 
Ways of overcoming barriers to communication
Ways of overcoming barriers to communicationWays of overcoming barriers to communication
Ways of overcoming barriers to communication
 
COMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERS
COMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERSCOMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERS
COMMUNICATION PROCESS,TYPES,MODES,BARRIERS
 
Barriers to effective communication and ways to overcome them
Barriers to effective communication and ways to overcome themBarriers to effective communication and ways to overcome them
Barriers to effective communication and ways to overcome them
 

Semelhante a JTPP_16-06_Drabkin

Reporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign Assets
Reporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign AssetsReporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign Assets
Reporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign Assetsgppcpa
 
Income taxes for individuals -5-27-15
Income taxes    for individuals -5-27-15Income taxes    for individuals -5-27-15
Income taxes for individuals -5-27-15geann123
 
A income taxes - for individuals
A   income taxes  - for individualsA   income taxes  - for individuals
A income taxes - for individualsgeann123
 
CFS_Alert_02232016
CFS_Alert_02232016CFS_Alert_02232016
CFS_Alert_02232016Ori Lev
 
Why And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset Protection
Why And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset ProtectionWhy And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset Protection
Why And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset ProtectionEllington78Ellington
 
15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jail
15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jail15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jail
15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jailBruce Givner
 
Understanding fatca icatt 07-01-15
Understanding fatca   icatt 07-01-15Understanding fatca   icatt 07-01-15
Understanding fatca icatt 07-01-15Derren Joseph
 
Fatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasion
Fatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasionFatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasion
Fatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasionAranca
 
Fight Mortgage Fraud
Fight Mortgage FraudFight Mortgage Fraud
Fight Mortgage Fraudrobert tapia
 
Geographic Targeting Orders
Geographic Targeting OrdersGeographic Targeting Orders
Geographic Targeting OrdersGabriele Masetti
 
Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017
Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017
Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017Downey Law Group LLC
 
Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE 5-2017
Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE  5-2017Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE  5-2017
Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE 5-2017Downey Law Group LLC
 
BOFI Whistleblower Complaint
BOFI Whistleblower ComplaintBOFI Whistleblower Complaint
BOFI Whistleblower Complaintquoththeraven
 
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docxFCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docxmydrynan
 
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory Conference
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory ConferenceForeign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory Conference
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory ConferenceHyperwallet
 

Semelhante a JTPP_16-06_Drabkin (20)

How the IRS Reconstructs Income In Tax Fraud Cases
How the IRS Reconstructs Income In Tax Fraud CasesHow the IRS Reconstructs Income In Tax Fraud Cases
How the IRS Reconstructs Income In Tax Fraud Cases
 
Reporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign Assets
Reporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign AssetsReporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign Assets
Reporting Requirements for US Citizens with Foreign Assets
 
Income taxes for individuals -5-27-15
Income taxes    for individuals -5-27-15Income taxes    for individuals -5-27-15
Income taxes for individuals -5-27-15
 
A income taxes - for individuals
A   income taxes  - for individualsA   income taxes  - for individuals
A income taxes - for individuals
 
CFS_Alert_02232016
CFS_Alert_02232016CFS_Alert_02232016
CFS_Alert_02232016
 
Why And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset Protection
Why And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset ProtectionWhy And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset Protection
Why And Where To Set Up A Foreign Trust For Asset Protection
 
15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jail
15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jail15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jail
15 01-15 everything you wanted to know about going to jail
 
Understanding fatca icatt 07-01-15
Understanding fatca   icatt 07-01-15Understanding fatca   icatt 07-01-15
Understanding fatca icatt 07-01-15
 
Fatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasion
Fatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasionFatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasion
Fatca high cost initiative to curb tax evasion
 
Fight Mortgage Fraud
Fight Mortgage FraudFight Mortgage Fraud
Fight Mortgage Fraud
 
Geographic Targeting Orders
Geographic Targeting OrdersGeographic Targeting Orders
Geographic Targeting Orders
 
Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017
Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017
Downey Law Group - Legal Ethics and Innovations - May 2017
 
The FATCA Hurricane Hits Ground
The FATCA Hurricane Hits GroundThe FATCA Hurricane Hits Ground
The FATCA Hurricane Hits Ground
 
Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE 5-2017
Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE  5-2017Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE  5-2017
Ethics at Sunrise program - Missouri Bar CLE 5-2017
 
BOFI Whistleblower Complaint
BOFI Whistleblower ComplaintBOFI Whistleblower Complaint
BOFI Whistleblower Complaint
 
De risking 101
De risking 101De risking 101
De risking 101
 
Fraud prevention
Fraud preventionFraud prevention
Fraud prevention
 
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docxFCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
 
Bad Debts
Bad DebtsBad Debts
Bad Debts
 
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory Conference
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory ConferenceForeign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory Conference
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) - DSA Global Regulatory Conference
 

JTPP_16-06_Drabkin

  • 1. DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 41 International Reporting Penalties—What to Expect and How to Fight Them By Igor S. Drabkin Igor Drabkin examines the international reporting penalties. His article focuses on the FBAR and IRS Forms 8938, 3520, 3520-A and the reasonable cause defense to them. U .S. taxpayers are required to report their worldwide income. U.S. filing requirements include various and significant reporting requirements with respect to U.S. taxpayer’s interest in certain foreign financial assets, foreign bank accounts, foreign partnerships, foreign corporations and foreign trusts. Heavy penalties,civilandcriminal,canbeimposedonthosetaxpayerswhofailtofilerequired information returns, or file them inaccurately or late. What are the penalties that can apply for noncompliance with international reporting? And how to defend them? A. FBAR Penalties Under the Bank Secrecy Act, each U.S. person must file FinCen Form104, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), if: the person has a financial interest in, or signature authority (or other author- ity that is comparable to signature authority) over one or more accounts in a foreign country, and the aggregate value of all foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. A U.S. person is not prohibited from owning foreign accounts; however, sig- nificant civil and criminal penalties may apply for failures to properly file FBARs when required.1 Criminal penalties for FBAR violations can result in a fine of $250,000 and five years of imprisonment.2 If the FBAR violation occurs while violating another law (such as another tax law, which is often a case) the penalties can be increased to $500,000 in fines and 10 years of imprisonment.3 ©2015 I.S. DRABKIN IGOR S. DRABKIN is an Attorney and a Principal with Holtz, Slavett & Drabkin, APLC in Beverly Hills, California. bank a penalti inform r co s, atio pe unts, vil n retu foreign ndcrim rns o partn na fil ershi nbe hem i rest in c oreign osedon urately o ert rp ho r la ns pa ra et e Wha and foreign rswhofai re the p trusts. tofilere alties t Heav qu at CCH Draft
  • 2. JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 42 INTERNATIONAL REPORTING PENALTIES In addition to the possible criminal penalties, the BSA imposes substantial civil penalties for violation of the FBAR rules.4 The amount of the civil penalty imposed for the FBAR violations depends on the type of the violation, i.e., whether such violation is willful or not. Failing to file an FBAR can carry a civil penalty of $10,000 for each non- willful violation.5 However, if the FBAR violation is found to be willful, the penalty can be the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the balance in the account at the time of the violation.6 Moreover, the FBAR penalty applies for each viola- tion, i.e., the penalty can be imposed with respect to each unreported account for multiple years. The statute of limitations for assessment of the FBAR penalties is six years from the due date of the return.7 In the recent case of C.R. Zwerner in the U.S. District Court, S. D. of Florida,8 the Jury determined that the taxpayer was liable for multiple FBAR penalties, agreeing with the government assessment of 50-percent penalties for three years, resulting in the FBAR penalty equal to practically 150 percent of the account balance. FBAR penalties totaled $2,241,809 with respect to an offshore account that had a high balance of $1,691,054. After the jury verdict, the taxpayer raised an argument under the 8th Amendment, arguing that such a penalty represented an Excessive Fine. This legal issue remains unresolved, however, as the parties in Zwerner settled without the District Court ruling on the constitutional question. InternalRevenueManual4.26.16.4.5.3statesthatthetest for willfulness is whether there was a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty. A finding of willfulness un- der the BSA must be supported by evidence of willfulness. The burden of establishing willfulness is on the IRS. If it is determined that the violation was due to reasonable cause, the willfulness penalty should not be asserted. Further, willfulness is shown by the person’s knowledge of the reporting requirements and the person’s conscious choice not to comply with the requirements. In the FBAR situation, the only thing that a person need know is that he has a reporting requirement. If a person has that knowledge, the only intent needed to constitute a willful violation of the requirement is a conscious choice not to file the FBAR. Under the concept of “willful blindness,” willfulness may be attributed to a person who has made a conscious effort to avoidlearningabouttheFBARreportingandrecordkeeping requirements.Willfulness can rarely be proven by direct evi- dence, since it is a state of mind. It is usually established by drawing a reasonable inference from the available facts. The government may base a determination of willfulness in the failure to file the FBAR on inference from conduct meant to conceal sources of income or other financial information. For FBAR purposes, this could include concealing signature authority, interests in various transactions, and interests in entities transferring cash to foreign banks. Chart 1 summarizes the civil and criminal penalties that may be asserted for not complying with the FBAR reporting and recordkeeping requirements. CHART 1.* Violation Civil Penalties Criminal Penalties Comments Negligent Violation Up to $500 N/A 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(6)(A) 31 C.F.R. 103.57(h). Non-Willful Violation Up to $10,000 for each negligent violation N/A 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5)(B) Pattern of Negligent Activity In addition to penalty under Code Sec. 5321(a)(6)(A) with respect to any such violation, not more than $50,000 N/A 31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(6)(B) Willful—Failure to File FBAR or retain records of account Up to the greater of $100,000, or 50 percent of the amount in the account at the time of the violation. Up to $250,000 or five years or both 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5)(C) 31 U.S.C. § 5322(a) and 31 C.F.R. § 103.59(b) for criminal. The penalty applies to all U.S. persons. Willful—Failure to File FBAR or retain records of account while violating certain other laws Up to the greater of $100,000, or 50 percent of the amount in the account at the time of the violation. Up to $500,000 or 10 years or both 31 U.S.C. § 5322(b) and 31 C.F.R. § 103.59(c) for criminal The penalty applies to all U.S. persons. Knowingly and Willfully Filing False FBAR Up to the greater of $100,000, or 50 percent of the amount in the account at the time of the violation. $10,000 or 5 years or both 18 U.S.C. § 1001, 31 C.F.R. § 103.59(d) for criminal. The penalty applies to all U.S. persons. *Civil and Criminal Penalties may be imposed together. 31 U.S.C. § 5321(d). in Zwerner se the constitutional qu ith es u ion. reporting asserted reco fo ke re in quirements. Ame E men Fi endm i ART T 1.* ne. pa par ulin n E ow how Dist Exce wever wever trict ssive r, as r, as Cou e Fin the the urt ru CCH Draft
  • 3. DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 43 The IRS has developed and adopted Mitigation Guide- lines for FBAR penalties, which provides a tiered approach to the penalties and can provide some relief to taxpayers with smaller accounts.9 The Internal Revenue Manual directs that “... examiners are to use discretion, taking into account the facts and circumstances of each case, in determining whether a warning letter or penalties that are less than the total amounts provided for in the mitigation guidelines are appropriate.”10 The IRM reminds examiners that “[t]he sole purpose for the FBAR penalties is to serve as a tool to promote compliance with respect to the FBAR reporting and recordkeeping requirements.”11 IRM Exhibit 4.26.16-2 establishes various levels of the penalties, based on the balance in the accounts. See Chart 2. FBAR penalties may be waived for “reasonable cause.” Internal Revenue Manual 4.26.16.4 provides that the IRS is supposed to use reasonable cause and good faith exception standards developed under Code Sec. 6662 and Reg. §1.6664-4. CHART 2.* Non-Willful (NW) Penalties To qualify for Level I-NW, determine aggregate balances If the maximum aggregate balance for all accounts to which the violations relate did not exceed $50,000 at any time during the year, Level I – NW applies to all violations. Determine the maximum balance at any time during the calendar year for each account. Add the individual maximum balances to find the maximum aggregate balance. Level I-NW Penalty is $500 for each violation, not to exceed an aggregate penalty of $5,000 for all violations. To qualify for Level II-NW, determine account balance If Level I-NW does not apply and if the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any time during the calendar year did not exceed $250,000, Level II-NW applies to that account. Level II-NW penalty is $5,000 for each Level II-NW account violation, not to exceed 10 percent of the maximum balance in the account during the year To qualify for Level III-NW If Level I-NW does not apply and if the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any time during the calendar year was more than $250,000, Level III-NW applies to that account. Level III-NW is $10,000 for each Level III-NW account violation, the statutory maximum for non-willful violations. Willfulness Penalties To qualify for Level I, determine aggregate balances If the maximum aggregate balance for all accounts to which the violations relate did not exceed $50,000, Level I applies to all accounts. Determine the maximum balance at any time during the calendar year for each account. Add the individual maximum balances to find the maximum aggregate balance. Level I penalty is The greater of $1,000 per violation or five percent of the maximum balance during the year of the account to which the violations relate for each violation. To qualify for Level II, determine account balance If Level I does not apply and if the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any time during the calendar year did not exceed $250,000, Level II applies to that account. Level II penalty is per account The greater of $5,000 per violation or 10 percent of the maximum balance during the calendar year for each Level II account. To Qualify for Level III If the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any time during the calendar year exceeded $250,000 but did not exceed $1 million, Level III applies to that account. Level III penalty is per account. The greater of (a) or (b): (a) 10 percent of the maximum balance during the calendar year for each Level III account, or (b) 50 percent of the closing balance in the account as of the last day for filing the FBAR. To qualify for Level IV If the maximum balance of the account to which the violations relate at any time during the calendar year exceeded $1 million, Level IV, the statutory maximum, applies to that account. Level IV penalty is per account the statutory maximum The greater of (a) or (b): (a) $100,000, or (b) 50 percent of the closing balance in the account as of the last day for filing the FBAR. * Exhibit 4.26.16-2 (07-01-2008), Normal FBAR Penalty MitigationGuidelines forViolationsOccurring AfterOctober 22, 2004 (available at http://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-026-016.html#d0e529). ea 00 If the maxim evel I app m aggre to all ac II at oun Willf al s. De ulness ce for al termine enalt ac h ies nts to aximu tory max h the v lance at m at ny at ns me dur xce not e did the cale ed $50,0 ar year 00 or g g ances g s l I, ate To et Lev vel III- qualif termin -NW i fy for ne ag is Level grega CCH Draft
  • 4. JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 44 INTERNATIONAL REPORTING PENALTIES B. Information Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations (Form 5471) and Certain Foreign Partnerships (Form 8865) U.S. citizens and U.S. residents who are officers, direc- tors, or shareholders in certain foreign corporations are responsible for filing Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corpora- tions. Form 5471 is due with the timely filed income tax return of the affected individual, including the extensions. Penalties for failure to file Form 5471 information return is established by Code Sec. 6038(a). The penalty with respect to Form 5471 equals to $10,000 for each annual accounting period of each foreign corporation for failure to furnish the required information within the time prescribed.12 Furthermore, additional penalties apply if the information is not provided by the taxpayer within 90 days of the notification by the IRS that such information is required.13 A $10,000 penalty (per foreign corporation) is charged for each 30-day period, or fraction thereof, during which the failure continues after the 90- day period has expired. This additional penalty is limited to a maximum of $50,000 for each failure.14 The penalty may be abated for reasonable cause.15 To show that reasonable cause exists, the person required to report such information must have filed for all open years (not on extension) and must make an affirmative showing of all facts alleged as reasonable cause for such failure in a written statement. For failure to file Form 5471, the writ- ten statement must contain a declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury.16 Reasonable cause defense, however, does not apply to the continuation penalty. In addition, failure to file Form 5471 or incomplete forms may result in the reduction of foreign tax credits. Any person who fails to file or report all information required within the time prescribed will be subject to a 10 percent reduction of the foreign taxes available for credit under Code Secs. 901, 902 and 960. If the failure continues 90 days or more after the date that the IRS mails notice, an additional five-percent reduction is made for each three-month period, or fraction thereof, during which the failure continues.17 Beginning in 2008, the IRS began automatic assessment of penalties under Code Sec. 6038(b)(1). Additional penalties may apply for failure of U.S. per- sons to report transfer of property in excess of $100,000 to a foreign corporation.18 The penalty is 10 percent of the asset value for nonintentional violations, up to $100,000, with no limitation for intentional valuations.19 Similar penalties applied for U.S. persons who fail to report certain interests, transfers, acquisitions and disposition in foreign partnerships, which need to be reported on Form 8865.20 C. Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets (Form 8938) Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial As- sets, became required beginning with the tax year 2011 under the terms of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). Certain U.S. taxpayers holding financial assets outside the United States must report those assets to the IRS, using Form 8938.21 In summary, Form 8938 should be filed by those taxpayers whose specified foreign financial assets are more than $50,000 (for single or mar- ried filing separate) or $100,000 (if married and filing jointly) at the end of the year, or exceed $75,000 (single or married, filing separate), or $150,000 (married, filing jointly) at any time during the year.22 These thresholds are higher for individuals residing abroad. “Specified foreign financial assets” include financial ac- counts (e.g., bank accounts, mutual funds, hedge funds, private equity funds) that are maintained by a foreign financial institution including financial institutions that are organized under the laws of a U.S. possession; stocks or securities issued by foreign persons; any other financial instrument or contract held for investment that is issued by foreign person or has a foreign person as a counterparty; and any interest in a foreign entity.23 Taxpayers may be subject to penalties if they fail to timely file a correct Form 8938 or if there is an understate- ment of tax relating to an undisclosed specified foreign financial asset. A failure to file a complete and correct Form 8938 by the due date (including applicable extensions), you may be subject to a penalty of $10,000.24 If a taxpayer does not In determining whether the “reasonable cause” defense exists, taxpayers and their representatives need to review all the relevant facts and circumstances. Code Sec. 603 71 equals to d of each required $10,00 reign c forma The 0 or on en for ea ra with ch on n shou fi ri uld be cial filin g Fo in d by s are m parate) m se re or $ ye $5 ax ha 100 00 s whose spe ,000 (for (if ma cified f ingle o d and oreig r m fi l f f i f o fur failu ure to fai hed ng rn hed For nn r Pe etu etu with enalt urn is urn is h res nual a failu ties f s esta s esta pect acco ure to for f ablish ablish to F untin o fur pe sh p h CCH Draft
  • 5. DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 45 file a correct and complete Form 8938 within 90 days after the IRS mails a notice of the failure to file, such taxpayer may be subject to an additional penalty of $10,000 for each 30-day period (or part of a period) during which you continue to fail to file Form 8938 after the 90-day period has expired. The maximum additional penalty for a continuing failure to file Form 8938 is $50,000.25 In addition, underpayment of tax as a result of a transac- tion involving an undisclosed specified foreign financial asset, may be subject to a penalty equal to 40 percent of that underpayment.26 The IRS provides the following examples of underpay- ments due to transactions involving an undisclosed speci- fied foreign financial assets: Taxpayer does not report ownership of shares in a foreign corporation on Form 8938 and Taxpayer received tax distributions from the company that you did not report on your income tax return. Taxpayer does not report ownership of shares in a foreign company on Form 8938 and Taxpayer sold the shares in the company for a gain, failing to report the gain on income tax return. Taxpayer does not report a foreign pension on Form 8938 and Taxpayer received a taxable distribution from the pension plan that Taxpayer did not report on your income tax return. If underpayment of tax is due to fraud, Taxpayer must pay a penalty of 75 percent of the underpayment due to fraud.27 Reasonable cause exception also applies to Form 8938 violations.28 If the failure to report the information required in Code Sec. 6038D(c) and Temporary Reg. §1.6038D-4Tis shown to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, no penalty will be imposed under Code Sec. 6038D(d) or this section.29 Form 8938 also has a “Duplicative Reporting” excep- tion.30 If Specified Foreign Financial Assets are reported on one or more of following forms for same tax year, then the taxpayer does not have to report them on Form 8938: Form 3520, Annual Return to ReportTransactionsWith Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts Form 5471, Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund Form 8865, Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships Form 8891, U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement Plans However, in order for the exception to apply, Form 8938 must identify Form on which SFFA reported, and quantity of this form filed. One important change that was effectuated by FATCA and enactment of Code Sec. 6038D and Form 8938 is the change to the statute of limitations for assessment under Code Sec. 6501. Under the new rules, the statute of limitations is extended to six years after a taxpayer’s return is filed if the taxpayer omits $5,000 from gross income attributable to a specified foreign financial asset, without regard to the reporting threshold or any reporting excep- tions.31 If the taxpayer fails to file or properly report an asset on Form 8938, the statute of limitations for the tax year is extended until the taxpayer provides the required information.32 If the failure is due to reasonable cause, the statute of limitations is extended only with regard to the item or items related to such failure and not the entire tax year. D. Form 3520 and Form 3520-A U.S. taxpayers are required to file information returns with respect to certain foreign trusts. Failure to file such information returns, Form 3520 and Form 3520-A, may be subject to penalties under Code Sec. 6677. Failure to report transactions involving foreign trusts on Form 3520 can result in the amount of 35 percent of the gross value of the distributions received from a foreign trust or transferred to a foreign trust.33 With respect to fail- ure to report certain foreign gifts, the penalty is imposed in the amount of five percent per month, up to 25 percent of the gift amount.34 Failure to report ownership interests in a foreign trust with U.S. owner on Form 3520-A can result in a penalty of $10,000 or four percent of the gross value of the trusts’ assets.35 Similar to other penalties, Form 3520 and 3520-A pen- alties may be waived for reasonable cause.36 The fact that disclosure is a crime in another country is not considered reasonable cause. E. Reasonable Cause Defense As discussed above, most of the penalties related to com- pliance with foreign accounts and assets can be waived or abated for reasonable cause. In determining whether Penalties for failure to comply with the reporting requirements related to foreign assets and accounts can be onerous. 5 percent of t ion also ap to rep plies to the i erp Fo for ym m mati 38 n with in b h resp mati ubjec rs are r o ce eturns penaltie q n Fo s u n re m 352 der C ilu s. F rus and Form e Sec 6 re to fi 3520-A 7 e suc A, on y f d inc your d If t C latio d ns. d i men alty use th alty R ol If mu mu due f und st pa st pa e to f Reaso latio derp ay a p ay a p fraud nabl ns 28 paym pena pena d.27 le cau 8 If t ex e fa f CCH Draft
  • 6. JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE DECEMBER 2014–JANUARY 2015 46 INTERNATIONAL REPORTING PENALTIES reasonable cause and good faith exists, the IRS will use standards developed under Code Sec. 6662 and Reg. §1.6664-4. An exception to the Code Sec. 6662(a) penalty is set forth in Code Sec. 6664(c)(1) and reads: “No penalty shall be imposed under this part with respect to any portion of an underpayment if it is shown that there was a reason- able cause for such portion and that the taxpayer acted in good faith with respect to such portion.” Regulations interpreting Code Sec. 6664(c) state: The determination of whether a taxpayer acted with reasonable cause and in good faith is made on a case- by-case basis, taking into account all pertinent facts and circumstances. Generally, the most important factor is the extent of the taxpayer’s effort to assess the taxpayer’s proper tax liability. Treas. Regs. §1.6664- 4(b)(1). The determination of whether the taxpayer acted with reasonable cause and in good faith depends on the pertinent facts and circumstances, including the knowledge and experience of the taxpayer and the reliance on the advice of a professional, such as an accountant. Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs. In determining whether the “reasonable cause” defense exists, taxpayers and their representatives need to review all the relevant facts and circumstances. The following fac- tors may be helpful in this analysis: good faith; ordinary care and prudence; reasonable reliance on a professional advice; first time mistake; sufficient disclosure on return; education and sophistication of taxpayer; out of ordinary circumstances, such as death, illness or injury of the tax- payer, a natural disaster, fire or other emergency.37 F. Conclusion Penalties for failure to comply with the reporting re- quirements related to foreign assets and accounts can be onerous.Taxpayers and tax professionals are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the rules and requirements im- posed by the Internal Revenue Code and Bank Secrecy Act to avoid criminal or civil exposure for lack of compliance. ENDNOTES 1 31 USC §§5321, 5322. 2 31 USC §5322(a). 3 31 USC §5322. 4 31 USC §5321. 5 31 USC §5321(a)(5)(B). 6 31 USC §5321(a)(5)(C). 7 31 USC §5321(b). 8 C.Zwerner,CivilDocketCase#1:13-cv-22082-CMA. 9 See IRM 4.26.16.4.5 (July 1, 2008). 10 IRM 4.26.16.4.4(3) (July 1, 2008). 11 IRM 4.26.16.4.4(3) (July 1, 2008). 12 Code Sec. 6038(b)(1). 13 Code Sec. 6038(b)(2). 14 Code Sec. 6038(b)(2). 15 Code Sec. 6038(c)(4). 16 IRM 20.1.9.4.5. 17 See Code Sec. 6038(c)(2). 18 Code Sec. 6038B. 19 Code Sec. 6038B(c). 20 Code Secs. 6038, 6038B and 6046A. 21 Code Sec. 6038D. 22 CodeSec.6038D(a);TemporaryReg.§1.6038D- 2T(a)(1). 23 Code Sec. 6038D(b); Temporary Reg. §§1.6038D-1T(a)(6), 3T(a)(2). 24 Code Sec. 6038D(d)(1). 25 Code Sec. 6038D(d)(2). 26 Code Sec. 6662(j)(3). 27 Code Sec. 6663. 28 Code Sec. 6038D(g). 29 Temporary Reg. §1.6038D-8T. 30 Temporary Reg. §1.6038D-7T(a). 31 Code Sec. 6015(e). 32 Code Sec. 6015(c)(8). 33 Code Sec. 6677(a) and (b). 34 Code Sec. 6039F. 35 Code Secs. 6048(b) and 6677. 36 Code Sec. 6677(d). 37 Reg. §1.6664-4(a) and IRM 20.1.5.6.1. This article is reprinted with the publisher’s permission from the JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE, a bi-monthly journal published by CCH, a part of Wolters Kluwer. Copying or distribution without the publisher’s permission is prohibited. To subscribe to the JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE or other CCH, a part of Wolters Kluwer Journals please call 800-449-8114 or visit CCHGroup.com. All views expressed in the articles and columns are those of the author and not necessarily those of CCH, a part of Wolters Kluwer or any other person. cv-22082-CMA ). 20 C Co Co 2T e S e S e S eS )(1) 6 cs. 603 6 60 8, 6038 8D. D(a and 60 por 046A. g.§1 D- 30 34 Te Co Co Co Cod 60 e S e Sec. 60 e Sec. 66 e Sec 60 5( 5(c)(8). (a) and (b). USC § . §5321 .4(3) ( 4(3) M 4.26 4 26 6.16.4. 6.16.4. (B) (C). (Ju (Ju etCa Se R 31 31 31 C.Z USC § USC § USC § Zwerne ee IRM M 4 26 §5321 §5321 §5321 er, r Civil , 4.26.1 616 4 (a)(5)( (a)(5)( (b). lDocke 16.4.5 4(3) ( y 1, y 1, 2 y 1 CCH Draft