SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 44
BY Dr.HEMANTH
MODERATER
Dr.SWAPNA.J
ASST.PROFESSOR
DEPT. OF RADIOTHERAPY, SVIMS.
 Introduction of fractionation
 4 “ R “ s of radiobiology
 5th R of radiobiology
 Probably 6th R of radiobiology
THE INTRODUCTION OF FRACTIONATION
 The multifraction regimens
commonly used in conventional
radiation therapy are a
consequence of radiobiologic
experiments performed in France
in the 1920s and 1930s.
 It was found that a ram could not
be sterilized by exposing its testes
to a single dose of radiation
without extensive skin damage to
the scrotum
 If the radiation was spread out over a period of weeks
in a series of daily fractions, sterilization was possible
without producing unacceptable skin damage .
 It was postulated that the testes were a model of a
growing tumor, whereas the skin of the scrotum
represented a dose-limiting normal-tissue.
 proved that fractionation of the radiation dose
produces, in most cases, better tumor control for a
given level of normal-tissue toxicity than a single
large dose.
THE FOUR Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY
Now, more than 80 years later, we can account for
the efficacy of fractionation based on more
relevant radiobiologic experiments. We can appeal
to the
“four Rs” of Radiobiology:
 Repair of sublethal damage
 Reassortment of cells within the cell cycle
 Repopulation
 Reoxygenation
 Radiation damage to mammalian cells can
operationally be divided into three categories:
 (1) lethal damage,irreversible and irreparable and
causes cell death.
 (2) potentially lethal damage (PLD), can be
modified by postirradiation environmental
conditions.
 (3) sublethal damage (SLD), can be repaired in
hours unless additional sublethal damage is added
with which it can interact to form lethal damage
Potentially Lethal Damage (PLD) Repair
 causes cell death
 PLD is repaired if cells are incubated in a balanced
salt solution instead of full growth medium for
several hours after irradiation which does not
mimic a physiologic condition
 Possible only in vitro
 The importance of PLD repair to clinical
radiotherapy is a matter of debate.
1.Sublethal Damage (SLD) Repair
 operational term for the increase in cell
survival that is observed if a given radiation
dose is split into two fractions separated by a
time interval.
Types of DNA damage
DNA REPAIR PATHWAYS
 Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER)
 Base Excision Repair (BER)
 DNA Double-Strand Break Repair :
homologous recombination repair(HRR)
requires undamaged DNA strand as a participant in
the repair as a template.
occurs primarily in the late S/G2 phase of the cell
cycle, when an undamaged sister chromatid is
available to act as a template.
predominant pathway in lower eukaryotes like yeast.
nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ):
 occurs in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, when no
such template exists.
 error prone and probably accounts for many of the
premutagenic lesions induced in the DNA of
human cells by ionizing radiation.
MECHANISM OF SLD REPAIR
 the repair of sublethal damage reflects the repair
and rejoining of double-strand breaks before they
can interact to form lethal lesion.
 If a dose is split into two parts separated by a time
interval, some of the double-strand breaks
produced by the first dose are rejoined and
repaired before the second dose and more cells
survive.
 cultured mammalian cells
maintained at room
temperature (24°C) between
the dose fractions to prevent
the cells from moving
through the cell cycle during
this interval. This rather
special experiment is
described first because it
illustrates repair of sublethal
radiation damage
uncomplicated by the
movement of cells through
the cell cycle.
2.Reassortment
 If an asynchronous population of cells present in
different phases of cell cycle is exposed to a large
dose of radiation, more cells are killed in the
sensitive than in the resistant phases of the cell
cycle. The surviving population of cells progresses
around cell cycle and said to be partly
synchronized.
 In Chinese hamster cells, most of the survivors from
a first dose are located in the S phase of the cell
cycle.
 If about 6 hours are allowed to elapse before a
second dose of radiation is given, this cohort of cells
progresses around the cell cycle and is in G2/M, a
sensitive period of the cell cycle, at the time of the
second dose.
 If the increase in radiosensitivity in moving from
late S to the G2/M period exceeds the effect of repair
of sublethal damage, the surviving fraction falls.
3.REPOPULATION
 Repopulation is the increase in cell division that is
seen in normal and malignant cells at some point
after radiation is delivered.
 In normal tissues Repopulation occurs in different
speeds depending on the tissue.
 early responding tissues begin repopulation at
about 4 weeks.
 By increasing treatment time over this amount, it
is possible to reduce early toxicity in that tissue.
 Late responding tissues only begin repopulation
after a conventional course of radiation has been
completed, and therefore repopulation has
minimal effect on these tissues (the repair 'R' is
more important for late tissues).
Accelerated repopulation
 Treatment with any cytotoxic agent, including
radiation, can trigger surviving cells (clonogens) in
a tumor to divide faster than before. This is known
as accelerated repopulation.
 There is evidence for a similar phenomenon in
human tumors.
 Withers and his colleagues surveyed the literature
on radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
 The analysis suggests that clonogen repopulation
in this human cancer accelerates at about 28 days
after the initiation of radiotherapy in a
fractionated regimen.
 A dose increment of about 0.6 Gy (60 rad) per day
is required to compensate for this repopulation.
 Such a dose increment is consistent with a 4-day
clonogen doubling rate, compared with a median
of about 60 days for unperturbed growth.
 The conclusion to be drawn from this is that
radiotherapy, at least for head and neck cancer and
probably in other instances also, should be completed
as soon after it has begun as is practicable.
 It may be better to delay initiation of treatment than
to introduce delays during treatment.
 If overall treatment time is too long, the effectiveness
of later dose fractions is compromised because the
surviving clonogens in the tumor have been triggered
into rapid repopulation.
Effect of oxygen in fixing radiation damage
representation of the dependence of radiosensitivity on oxygen concentration. If the
radiosensitivity under extremely anoxic conditions is arbitrarily assigned unity the relative
radiosensitivity is about 3 under well-oxygenated conditions. Most of this change of sensitivity
occurs as the oxygen tension increases from 0 to 30 mm Hg. A further increase of oxygen content
to that characteristic of air or even pure oxygen at high pressure has little further effect. A relative
radiosensitivity halfway between anoxia and full oxygenation occurs for a pO2 of about 3 mm Hg,
which corresponds to a concentration of about 0.5% oxygen.
Chronic hypoxia
 (1) those that appear to be proliferating well and (2)
those that are dead or dying.
 Between these two extremes, region in which cells
would be at an oxygen tension high enough for cells
to be clonogenic but low enough to render the cells
protected from the effect of ionizing radiation.
 Cells in this region would be relatively protected
from a treatment with x-rays because of their low
oxygen tension and could provide a focus for the
subsequent regrowth of the tumor.
Acute hypoxia
 Regions of acute hypoxia develop in tumors as a
result of the temporary closing or blockage of a
particular blood vessel. If this blockage were
permanent, the cells downstream, would
eventually die and be of no further consequence.
 But tumor blood vessels open and close in a
random fashion, so that different regions of the
tumor become hypoxic intermittently.
 In fact, acute hypoxia results from transient
fluctuations in blood flow due to the malformed
vasculature.
 At the moment when a dose of radiation is
delivered, a proportion of tumor cells may be
hypoxic, but if the radiation is delayed until a later
time, a different group of cells may be hypoxic.
4.REOXYGENATION
 Phenomenon by
which hypoxic cells
become oxygenated
after a dose of
radiation is termed
reoxygenation.
 A modest dose of x-rays to a mixed population of aerated
and hypoxic cells results in significant killing of aerated
cells, but little killing of hypoxic cells.
 Consequently, the viable cell population immediately after
irradiation is dominated by hypoxic cells.
 If sufficient time is allowed before the next radiation dose,
the process of reoxygenation restores the proportion of
hypoxic cells to about 15%.
 If this process is repeated many times, the tumor cell
population is depleted, despite the resistence of hypoxic
cells to killing by x-rays.
 In other words, if reoxygenation is efficient between dose
fractions, the presence of hypoxic cells does not have a
significant effect on the outcome of a multifraction
regimen.
MECHANISM OF REOXYGENATION
 Some tumors take days to reoxygenate ; and in
others process completes with in 1 hr
 Contain two components fast and slow reflecting
two types of hypoxia acute versus chronic
 Some tumors show both fast and slow components
SLOW COMPONENT
TAKES PLACE OVER A PERIOD OF DAYS IN CHRONICALLY HYPOXIC
CELLS
After a dose of radiation
Tumor cells killed and removed from population
tumor shrinks in size and restructuring or a revascularization
of the tumor occurs
surviving cells previously beyond the range of oxygen
diffusion become closer to a blood supply and so reoxygenate.
FAST COMPONENT
 First component of reoxygenation
 complete within hours
 caused by the reoxygenation of acutely hypoxic cells.
 Those cells that were hypoxic at the time of irradiation
because they were in regions in which a blood vessel
was temporarily closed quickly reoxygenate when that
vessel is reopened.
Importance of Reoxygenation in RT
 If all the human tumors reoxygenate rapidly , use
of a multifraction course of radiotherapy,
extending over a period of time, can deal
effectively with any hypoxic cells in human
tumors.
 - mouse mammary carcinoma
that reoxygenates rapidly and well .
 - rat sarcoma that shows two
waves of reoxygenation .
 - mouse osteosarcoma that does
not reoxygenate at all for several days
and then only slowly .
 - mouse fibrosarcoma that
reoxygenates quickly but not as
completely as the mammary
carcinoma .
 - mouse fibrosarcoma that
reoxygenates quickly and well .The proportion of hypoxic cells as a function
of time after irradiation with a large dose of
x-rays for five transplanted tumors in
experimental animals.
 Making optimal choice of fractionation, demands a
detailed knowledge of the time course of
reoxygenation in the particular tumor to be irradiated.
 Unfortunately, this information is available for only a
few animal tumors and no information at present for
human tumors. Indeed, in humans it is not known
with certainty whether any or all tumors reoxygenated
 Evidence from radiotherapy clinics that many tumors
are eradicated with doses of 60 Gy in 30 fractions
argues strongly in favor of reoxygenation.
SUMMARY
 Fractionation
allows the repair and regeneration of normal
tissues.
sensitizes the tumor cells to radiation.
 Repair in between the fractions benefits the
normal tissues but makes the tumor cells more
resistant.
 Reassortment makes the tumor sensitive to RT
 Repopulation or regeneration benefits the normal
tissues in between fractions but makes the tumor
cells resistant to RT
 Reoxygenation makes the tumor sensitive to RT
 Recovery in normal tissues after RT = repair +
regeneration
REASSORTMENT & REOXYGENATION - FRIENDS
OF TUMOR RADIOTHERAPY
REPAIR & REPOPULATION – FOES OF TUMOR
RADIOTHERAPY (but friends of normal tissues)
5th R of RADIOBIOLOGY
RADIOSENSITIVITY
Law of Bergonie & Tribondeau
 Radiosensitivty of living tissues varies with
maturation & metabolism;
1. Stem cells are radiosensitive. More mature cells are
more resistant
2. Younger tissues are more radiosensitive
3. Tissues with high metabolic activity are highly
radiosensitive
4. High proliferation and growth rate, high
radiosensitivty
 Response of tissue determined by amount ofenergy
deposited per unit mass (dose in Gy)
 Two identical doses may not produce identical responses
due to other modifying factors
 Physical Factors Biological Factors
- linear energy thansfer – Oxygen Effect
- relative biological effectiveness – Age
- fractionation – Recovery
– Chemical Agents
– Hormesis
Radiosensitivity
of different cells
in humans in
order from least
sensitive to most
sensitive
6th R of radiobiology
? REMOTE CELL KILL – BYSTANDER EFFECT
 Phenomenon in which unirradiated cells exhibit
irradiated effects as a result of signals received from
nearby irradiated cells.
 In November 1992, Hatsumi Nagasawa and John B.
Little first reported this radiobiological phenomenon
 Might be due to activation cells of innate immune
system by ionizing radiation to produce pro-
inflammatory mediators of genomic instability and
cause suppression of cytokine production in the
surrounding non-irradiated cells via the bystander
effect.
ABSCOPAL effect(ab - away from ; scopal -
target)
 Defined as a reaction of cells within an organism
that had not been directly exposed to irradiation,
but cause tumor regression of the non-irradiated
tumors (Postow et al., 2012).
 Thought to be mediated by activation of the
immune system via cytokines.
THANK YOU

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effectChap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Korea Cancer Center Hospital
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
DeepaGautam
 
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in RadiotherapyFractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
ameneh haghbin
 
Tissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivityTissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivity
DeepaGautam
 

Mais procurados (20)

Time, dose and fractionation
Time, dose and fractionationTime, dose and fractionation
Time, dose and fractionation
 
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effectChap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
 
Hyperthermia in radiotherapy
Hyperthermia in radiotherapyHyperthermia in radiotherapy
Hyperthermia in radiotherapy
 
Clinical response to normal tissue with radiation
Clinical response to normal tissue with radiationClinical response to normal tissue with radiation
Clinical response to normal tissue with radiation
 
4 R OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
4 R OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx4 R OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
4 R OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
cell survival curve
cell survival curvecell survival curve
cell survival curve
 
Cell survival curve
Cell survival curveCell survival curve
Cell survival curve
 
Gap correction
Gap correctionGap correction
Gap correction
 
Linear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model pptLinear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model ppt
 
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenationRADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
 
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in RadiotherapyFractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
 
Altered fractionation kiran
Altered fractionation   kiranAltered fractionation   kiran
Altered fractionation kiran
 
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncologyAltered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
 
Basics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic modelBasics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic model
 
Physical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
Physical Models For Time Dose & FractionationPhysical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
Physical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
 
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
 
Radioprotector & sensitizer
Radioprotector & sensitizerRadioprotector & sensitizer
Radioprotector & sensitizer
 
Cell survival curve ppt.
Cell survival curve ppt.Cell survival curve ppt.
Cell survival curve ppt.
 
Tissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivityTissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivity
 

Semelhante a 4 rs of radiobiology

Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
drmcbansal
 
4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiology4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiology
saikishore15
 
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & FractionationrevisedTime , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
PGIMER, AIIMS
 

Semelhante a 4 rs of radiobiology (20)

FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptFOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
 
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
 
4R of Radiobiology.pptx
4R of Radiobiology.pptx4R of Radiobiology.pptx
4R of Radiobiology.pptx
 
4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiology4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiology
 
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
 
Chemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant coursesChemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
 
Fractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effectFractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effect
 
RADIATION BIOLOGY
RADIATION BIOLOGYRADIATION BIOLOGY
RADIATION BIOLOGY
 
BASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPYBASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
 
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & FractionationrevisedTime , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
 
Radiobiology for radiotherapy residents
Radiobiology for radiotherapy residentsRadiobiology for radiotherapy residents
Radiobiology for radiotherapy residents
 
Chap6 oxygen effect and reoxygenation
Chap6 oxygen effect and reoxygenationChap6 oxygen effect and reoxygenation
Chap6 oxygen effect and reoxygenation
 
Acute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndromeAcute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndrome
 
Radiobiology of Altered Fractionation-1.pptx
Radiobiology of Altered  Fractionation-1.pptxRadiobiology of Altered  Fractionation-1.pptx
Radiobiology of Altered Fractionation-1.pptx
 
Principles of chemoradiations
Principles of chemoradiationsPrinciples of chemoradiations
Principles of chemoradiations
 
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal TissuesLate effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
 
Oer , rbe & let
Oer , rbe & letOer , rbe & let
Oer , rbe & let
 
Oltre l’alfa/beta: ipotesi di coinvolgimento dell’endotelio e modelli preditt...
Oltre l’alfa/beta: ipotesi di coinvolgimento dell’endotelio e modelli preditt...Oltre l’alfa/beta: ipotesi di coinvolgimento dell’endotelio e modelli preditt...
Oltre l’alfa/beta: ipotesi di coinvolgimento dell’endotelio e modelli preditt...
 
BOOK ON REIRRADIATION
BOOK ON REIRRADIATIONBOOK ON REIRRADIATION
BOOK ON REIRRADIATION
 
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology course
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology courseGlimpse of clinical radiobiology course
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology course
 

Último

Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 

Último (20)

Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptxAsian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
Asian American Pacific Islander Month DDSD 2024.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
 

4 rs of radiobiology

  • 2.  Introduction of fractionation  4 “ R “ s of radiobiology  5th R of radiobiology  Probably 6th R of radiobiology
  • 3. THE INTRODUCTION OF FRACTIONATION  The multifraction regimens commonly used in conventional radiation therapy are a consequence of radiobiologic experiments performed in France in the 1920s and 1930s.  It was found that a ram could not be sterilized by exposing its testes to a single dose of radiation without extensive skin damage to the scrotum
  • 4.  If the radiation was spread out over a period of weeks in a series of daily fractions, sterilization was possible without producing unacceptable skin damage .  It was postulated that the testes were a model of a growing tumor, whereas the skin of the scrotum represented a dose-limiting normal-tissue.  proved that fractionation of the radiation dose produces, in most cases, better tumor control for a given level of normal-tissue toxicity than a single large dose.
  • 5. THE FOUR Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY Now, more than 80 years later, we can account for the efficacy of fractionation based on more relevant radiobiologic experiments. We can appeal to the “four Rs” of Radiobiology:  Repair of sublethal damage  Reassortment of cells within the cell cycle  Repopulation  Reoxygenation
  • 6.  Radiation damage to mammalian cells can operationally be divided into three categories:  (1) lethal damage,irreversible and irreparable and causes cell death.  (2) potentially lethal damage (PLD), can be modified by postirradiation environmental conditions.  (3) sublethal damage (SLD), can be repaired in hours unless additional sublethal damage is added with which it can interact to form lethal damage
  • 7. Potentially Lethal Damage (PLD) Repair  causes cell death  PLD is repaired if cells are incubated in a balanced salt solution instead of full growth medium for several hours after irradiation which does not mimic a physiologic condition  Possible only in vitro  The importance of PLD repair to clinical radiotherapy is a matter of debate.
  • 8. 1.Sublethal Damage (SLD) Repair  operational term for the increase in cell survival that is observed if a given radiation dose is split into two fractions separated by a time interval.
  • 9. Types of DNA damage
  • 10. DNA REPAIR PATHWAYS  Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER)  Base Excision Repair (BER)  DNA Double-Strand Break Repair : homologous recombination repair(HRR) requires undamaged DNA strand as a participant in the repair as a template. occurs primarily in the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle, when an undamaged sister chromatid is available to act as a template. predominant pathway in lower eukaryotes like yeast.
  • 11. nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ):  occurs in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, when no such template exists.  error prone and probably accounts for many of the premutagenic lesions induced in the DNA of human cells by ionizing radiation.
  • 12. MECHANISM OF SLD REPAIR  the repair of sublethal damage reflects the repair and rejoining of double-strand breaks before they can interact to form lethal lesion.  If a dose is split into two parts separated by a time interval, some of the double-strand breaks produced by the first dose are rejoined and repaired before the second dose and more cells survive.
  • 13.  cultured mammalian cells maintained at room temperature (24°C) between the dose fractions to prevent the cells from moving through the cell cycle during this interval. This rather special experiment is described first because it illustrates repair of sublethal radiation damage uncomplicated by the movement of cells through the cell cycle.
  • 14. 2.Reassortment  If an asynchronous population of cells present in different phases of cell cycle is exposed to a large dose of radiation, more cells are killed in the sensitive than in the resistant phases of the cell cycle. The surviving population of cells progresses around cell cycle and said to be partly synchronized.
  • 15.  In Chinese hamster cells, most of the survivors from a first dose are located in the S phase of the cell cycle.  If about 6 hours are allowed to elapse before a second dose of radiation is given, this cohort of cells progresses around the cell cycle and is in G2/M, a sensitive period of the cell cycle, at the time of the second dose.  If the increase in radiosensitivity in moving from late S to the G2/M period exceeds the effect of repair of sublethal damage, the surviving fraction falls.
  • 16. 3.REPOPULATION  Repopulation is the increase in cell division that is seen in normal and malignant cells at some point after radiation is delivered.  In normal tissues Repopulation occurs in different speeds depending on the tissue.  early responding tissues begin repopulation at about 4 weeks.  By increasing treatment time over this amount, it is possible to reduce early toxicity in that tissue.
  • 17.  Late responding tissues only begin repopulation after a conventional course of radiation has been completed, and therefore repopulation has minimal effect on these tissues (the repair 'R' is more important for late tissues).
  • 18. Accelerated repopulation  Treatment with any cytotoxic agent, including radiation, can trigger surviving cells (clonogens) in a tumor to divide faster than before. This is known as accelerated repopulation.  There is evidence for a similar phenomenon in human tumors.  Withers and his colleagues surveyed the literature on radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
  • 19.  The analysis suggests that clonogen repopulation in this human cancer accelerates at about 28 days after the initiation of radiotherapy in a fractionated regimen.  A dose increment of about 0.6 Gy (60 rad) per day is required to compensate for this repopulation.  Such a dose increment is consistent with a 4-day clonogen doubling rate, compared with a median of about 60 days for unperturbed growth.
  • 20.  The conclusion to be drawn from this is that radiotherapy, at least for head and neck cancer and probably in other instances also, should be completed as soon after it has begun as is practicable.  It may be better to delay initiation of treatment than to introduce delays during treatment.  If overall treatment time is too long, the effectiveness of later dose fractions is compromised because the surviving clonogens in the tumor have been triggered into rapid repopulation.
  • 21.
  • 22. Effect of oxygen in fixing radiation damage
  • 23. representation of the dependence of radiosensitivity on oxygen concentration. If the radiosensitivity under extremely anoxic conditions is arbitrarily assigned unity the relative radiosensitivity is about 3 under well-oxygenated conditions. Most of this change of sensitivity occurs as the oxygen tension increases from 0 to 30 mm Hg. A further increase of oxygen content to that characteristic of air or even pure oxygen at high pressure has little further effect. A relative radiosensitivity halfway between anoxia and full oxygenation occurs for a pO2 of about 3 mm Hg, which corresponds to a concentration of about 0.5% oxygen.
  • 24.
  • 25. Chronic hypoxia  (1) those that appear to be proliferating well and (2) those that are dead or dying.  Between these two extremes, region in which cells would be at an oxygen tension high enough for cells to be clonogenic but low enough to render the cells protected from the effect of ionizing radiation.  Cells in this region would be relatively protected from a treatment with x-rays because of their low oxygen tension and could provide a focus for the subsequent regrowth of the tumor.
  • 26. Acute hypoxia  Regions of acute hypoxia develop in tumors as a result of the temporary closing or blockage of a particular blood vessel. If this blockage were permanent, the cells downstream, would eventually die and be of no further consequence.  But tumor blood vessels open and close in a random fashion, so that different regions of the tumor become hypoxic intermittently.
  • 27.  In fact, acute hypoxia results from transient fluctuations in blood flow due to the malformed vasculature.  At the moment when a dose of radiation is delivered, a proportion of tumor cells may be hypoxic, but if the radiation is delayed until a later time, a different group of cells may be hypoxic.
  • 28. 4.REOXYGENATION  Phenomenon by which hypoxic cells become oxygenated after a dose of radiation is termed reoxygenation.
  • 29.  A modest dose of x-rays to a mixed population of aerated and hypoxic cells results in significant killing of aerated cells, but little killing of hypoxic cells.  Consequently, the viable cell population immediately after irradiation is dominated by hypoxic cells.  If sufficient time is allowed before the next radiation dose, the process of reoxygenation restores the proportion of hypoxic cells to about 15%.  If this process is repeated many times, the tumor cell population is depleted, despite the resistence of hypoxic cells to killing by x-rays.  In other words, if reoxygenation is efficient between dose fractions, the presence of hypoxic cells does not have a significant effect on the outcome of a multifraction regimen.
  • 30. MECHANISM OF REOXYGENATION  Some tumors take days to reoxygenate ; and in others process completes with in 1 hr  Contain two components fast and slow reflecting two types of hypoxia acute versus chronic  Some tumors show both fast and slow components
  • 31. SLOW COMPONENT TAKES PLACE OVER A PERIOD OF DAYS IN CHRONICALLY HYPOXIC CELLS After a dose of radiation Tumor cells killed and removed from population tumor shrinks in size and restructuring or a revascularization of the tumor occurs surviving cells previously beyond the range of oxygen diffusion become closer to a blood supply and so reoxygenate.
  • 32. FAST COMPONENT  First component of reoxygenation  complete within hours  caused by the reoxygenation of acutely hypoxic cells.  Those cells that were hypoxic at the time of irradiation because they were in regions in which a blood vessel was temporarily closed quickly reoxygenate when that vessel is reopened.
  • 33. Importance of Reoxygenation in RT  If all the human tumors reoxygenate rapidly , use of a multifraction course of radiotherapy, extending over a period of time, can deal effectively with any hypoxic cells in human tumors.
  • 34.  - mouse mammary carcinoma that reoxygenates rapidly and well .  - rat sarcoma that shows two waves of reoxygenation .  - mouse osteosarcoma that does not reoxygenate at all for several days and then only slowly .  - mouse fibrosarcoma that reoxygenates quickly but not as completely as the mammary carcinoma .  - mouse fibrosarcoma that reoxygenates quickly and well .The proportion of hypoxic cells as a function of time after irradiation with a large dose of x-rays for five transplanted tumors in experimental animals.
  • 35.  Making optimal choice of fractionation, demands a detailed knowledge of the time course of reoxygenation in the particular tumor to be irradiated.  Unfortunately, this information is available for only a few animal tumors and no information at present for human tumors. Indeed, in humans it is not known with certainty whether any or all tumors reoxygenated  Evidence from radiotherapy clinics that many tumors are eradicated with doses of 60 Gy in 30 fractions argues strongly in favor of reoxygenation.
  • 36. SUMMARY  Fractionation allows the repair and regeneration of normal tissues. sensitizes the tumor cells to radiation.  Repair in between the fractions benefits the normal tissues but makes the tumor cells more resistant.  Reassortment makes the tumor sensitive to RT
  • 37.  Repopulation or regeneration benefits the normal tissues in between fractions but makes the tumor cells resistant to RT  Reoxygenation makes the tumor sensitive to RT  Recovery in normal tissues after RT = repair + regeneration REASSORTMENT & REOXYGENATION - FRIENDS OF TUMOR RADIOTHERAPY REPAIR & REPOPULATION – FOES OF TUMOR RADIOTHERAPY (but friends of normal tissues)
  • 38. 5th R of RADIOBIOLOGY RADIOSENSITIVITY Law of Bergonie & Tribondeau  Radiosensitivty of living tissues varies with maturation & metabolism; 1. Stem cells are radiosensitive. More mature cells are more resistant 2. Younger tissues are more radiosensitive 3. Tissues with high metabolic activity are highly radiosensitive 4. High proliferation and growth rate, high radiosensitivty
  • 39.  Response of tissue determined by amount ofenergy deposited per unit mass (dose in Gy)  Two identical doses may not produce identical responses due to other modifying factors  Physical Factors Biological Factors - linear energy thansfer – Oxygen Effect - relative biological effectiveness – Age - fractionation – Recovery – Chemical Agents – Hormesis
  • 40. Radiosensitivity of different cells in humans in order from least sensitive to most sensitive
  • 41. 6th R of radiobiology ? REMOTE CELL KILL – BYSTANDER EFFECT  Phenomenon in which unirradiated cells exhibit irradiated effects as a result of signals received from nearby irradiated cells.  In November 1992, Hatsumi Nagasawa and John B. Little first reported this radiobiological phenomenon  Might be due to activation cells of innate immune system by ionizing radiation to produce pro- inflammatory mediators of genomic instability and cause suppression of cytokine production in the surrounding non-irradiated cells via the bystander effect.
  • 42. ABSCOPAL effect(ab - away from ; scopal - target)  Defined as a reaction of cells within an organism that had not been directly exposed to irradiation, but cause tumor regression of the non-irradiated tumors (Postow et al., 2012).  Thought to be mediated by activation of the immune system via cytokines.
  • 43.