Call Girls Jaipur Just Call 9521753030 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Evidence-informed decision making – process and results to inform a breastfeeding program in a public health unit in Ontario
1.
2. Outline
• About the partners
• Project background
• Objectives
• Methods
• Results
• Learning
3. Project Partners
Region of Peel Public Health
• West of Toronto
• 2nd largest public health unit in
Ontario
Health Evidence
• Based at McMaster University
• Dedicated to a Canadian public
health system informed by the
best-available evidence
4. Peel Public Health
• Cities of Mississauga,
Brampton and Town of
Caledon – population
>1.25 million
• Higher proportion of
children, young
families and
immigrants than rest
of Ontario
5. Baby-friendly Designation
• Baby Friendly Community Health
Service - in June 2009:
– seven Point Plan outcome criteria
were met; 5 years to achieve
– awarded by the Breastfeeding
Committee for Canada, the national
authority for WHO/UNICEF
– Baby-friendly Initiative
7. Health Evidence
Provide and promote access to the best
available evidence
– Registry
– Literature searches & summaries
– Facilitated evidence reviews
Provide knowledge‐brokering services
– Customized EIDM training
– Mentoring and Knowledge Broker
8. Health Evidence
• online registry –
1900 reviews
• evaluated
interventions
• updated
quarterly
• quality-assessed
• searchable by
commonly-used
public health
terms
• two page
summaries
11. Key Message Development
Goal: To provide the best available
evidence about the health
consequences of formula feeding and
to support informed decision-making
with a comprehensive website to
build efficacy and confidence to
breastfeed
12. EIDM Model
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
Haynes B, DiCenso, A., Ciliska D., & Guyatt, G. 2005
13. EIDM Process
Assess
applicability
Interpret
Appraise
the quality
Search
for
evidence
Define
the
questio
n
14. Objective
• Determine if the available research
literature supported a claim of improved
cognitive development due to
breastfeeding.
15. Methods
• Define the question
• Search the literature
• Relevance & quality assessment
• Critical appraisal
• Interpretation
• Decision-making
16. The Question
Is breastfeeding exclusively for 6
months associated with enhanced
cognitive development outcomes in
children when compared with
formula feeding?
17. The Search
• Database searches of Medline, Embase,
CINAHL (2005-2009), searches run
June 10, 2009
• Search terms were limited to results
relating to humans, and English
language
19. Findings
4 studies moderate quality
6 had serious methodological flaws
Good quality evidence suggested:
- No relationship between
breastfeeding and cognitive
development when you control for
maternal characteristics including IQ,
socio-environmental factors
20. Decision Factors
• Research evidence
define
question
• Public health
search
&
appraise
experience, beliefs context
apply
• Public health
credibility
Evidence-informed decision
• Audience assessment
21. Decision
- Concept for the ‘IQ’ poster was deferred
- Continued with infection, weight
22. Learning and Next Steps
• Crafting messaging to explain these
findings
• Continue to mine the literature
• For Clients: create web pages with
information about findings in language
that is suitable to all literacy levels and
add to the FormulaNOthanks.ca website
• For Staff: Ongoing EIDM training,
organizational supports and opportunities
23. Thank you!
Peel Health Health Evidence
Beverley Bryant, Maureen Dobbins
Manager of Education and Research Director
Beverley.bryant@peelregion.ca dobbinsm@mcmaster.ca
Angela Garrison, Lori Greco
Family Health Supervisor Knowledge Broker,
Angela.garrison@peelregion.ca lgreco@mcmaster.ca