SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 6
Baixar para ler offline
Group Eight - 8AA SMS 221NAA
The Data analysis of Southwest Airlines
SeyedHamed Jabbari Behnam 016460156
Courtney Young 035044114
Nicoy Davis 111996153
Group 8AA SMS221 1
The Data Analysis of Southwest Airlines’ Incidents
Risk Level by Aircraft Type:
High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk
B737-300 5 18 16
B737-500 0 2 2
B737-700 8 22 14
B737-800 1 1 2
In regards to risk level by aircraft type, Southwest’s largest aircraft (B737-800’s) saw the
fewest accidents/incidents with low level risk being more frequent. Astonishingly enough,
Southwest’s B737-700’s experienced the highest level and medium level incidents. The B737-
500’s reassuringly saw no high level risk incidents and very few medium and low level risk
occurrences.
Risk Level by Causal Factors:
High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk
People 4 3 3
Equipment 6 22 25
Environment 4 18 5
Organization 0 0 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
B737-300 B737-500 B737-700 B737-800
NumbersofIncidents
Type of Aircraft
Risk Level by Aircraft Type
High level of risk
Medium level of risk
Low level of risk
Group 8AA SMS221 2
According to the data collected, the airlines equipment seems to be the number one cause
for medium and high level risk incidents. Whether there was smoke in the cabin, problematic
landing gear or fuel leakage, these all resulted in low to high risk occurrences. Southwest’s
organization was responsible for the fewest amount of episodes. In one occurrence, a drone was
seen on approach. With good communication however, this event only led to a low level risk
incident.
Risk Level by Department:
High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk
Maintenance 9 38 30
Flight Ops. 3 4 2
Commercial 2 1 2
Our findings resulted in Southwest’s maintenance department to be more involved in the
airline’s occurrences. This does not necessarily mean that they are at fault for the majority of
events, but they are undeniably the department that resolves the issue afterwards. Most incidents
result in maintenance ensuring that the aircraft is safe to fly or if it needs to be repaired.
Therefore, the amount of low, medium and high risk events that they are involved with is logical.
The commercial department and flight operations department do not particularly compare with
the maintenance department with the commercial department having the least involvement.
0
5
10
15
20
25
People Equipment Environment Organization
High level of risk
Medium level of risk
Low level of risk
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
High level of risk
Medium level of risk
Low level of risk
Commercial
Flight Ops.
Maintenance
Group 8AA SMS221 3
Risk Level by Flight Phases:
High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk
APR 1 9 6
ENR 6 7 14
ICL 4 20 10
LDG 2 1 4
TXI 1 2 0
TOF 0 4 0
It is concluded that during the initial climb, Southwest Airlines saw the most
accidents/incidents. During this phase of flight is when an engine would fail or the aircraft would
strike a bird which were two of the more frequent causal factors. These incidents typically
resulted in a low to medium level of risk. Trailing behind, the enroute phase of flight also lead to
a few more events than the other phases of flight. This could have been caused by turbulence
resulting in injury as it was quite recurrent. Taxiing and take-off could possibly be acknowledged
as the safest phase of flight for Southwest Airlines as they both result in zero low level risk
occurrences and very few medium level risk incidents.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
APR ENR ICL LDG TXI TOF
High level of risk
Medium level of risk
Low level of risk
Group 8AA SMS221 4
OCCURRENCE TYPES:
Based on the information gathered the following key findings were determined:
25% of the incidents/ accidents were related to Bird Strikes, while 14% were related system
component failures (non power plant) such as Damaged tires, problems with flaps and landing
gear, and 12% of cabin related issues varying from smoke smell in cabin to issues with
pressurization. 10% were system component failure (power plant) such as one more Engine
failures enroute. This might could be due to poor maintenance and an aging fleet.
Group 8AA SMS221 5
Conclusion:
Thorough analysis of the 90 Aviation Herald Accident reports on Southwest Airlines the
following key findings were determined:
 25% of accidents/incidents were related to bird strikes.
 14% of incidents/accidents were related to system component failures.
 Southwest B737-700’s experienced the highest level of medium risk incidents.
 The airlines Equipment is at the number causal factor of medium to high level incidents.
 The department that saw the most occurrences was maintenance.
 The phase of flight in which the accidents were most prone was determined to be the
Initial Climb.
With 14% of incidents related to system component failures and resulting in equipment being the
cause of 22 medium level risk and 6 high level risk, the airline needs to implement better
maintenance procedures in relation to aircraft maintenance. The airline also needs to review its
SOP as it relates to preflight checks to ensure that its aircraft are truly fit to fly.
Some of the challenges faced while compiling the data are as follows:
 No consistency in the way data is reported in the AV Herald for example some reports
listed total crew and pax separately whilst some reports just listed total souls onboard.
 Meticulous caution has to be taken when entering data in order to maintain accuracy.
 The weather column was of no use as out of 90 reported incidents only 4 report weather
conditions.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Threat and Error Management in AviationThreat and Error Management in Aviation
Threat and Error Management in AviationTilak Ramaprakash
 
Equipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic Control
Equipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic ControlEquipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic Control
Equipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic ControlÜlger Ahmet
 
NTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require Vigilance
NTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require VigilanceNTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require Vigilance
NTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require VigilanceFAA Safety Team Central Florida
 
Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015
Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015
Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015Mike Pilgrim
 
IHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and Operators
IHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and OperatorsIHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and Operators
IHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and OperatorsIHSTFAA
 
Human factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&membersHuman factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&memberssrilestari71
 

Mais procurados (20)

FAA Standdown - Dont be Surprised, Be Prepared!
FAA Standdown - Dont be Surprised, Be Prepared!FAA Standdown - Dont be Surprised, Be Prepared!
FAA Standdown - Dont be Surprised, Be Prepared!
 
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Threat and Error Management in AviationThreat and Error Management in Aviation
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
 
FAA Risk Management
FAA Risk ManagementFAA Risk Management
FAA Risk Management
 
Hafiz hassan
Hafiz hassanHafiz hassan
Hafiz hassan
 
FAA Risk Management
FAA Risk ManagementFAA Risk Management
FAA Risk Management
 
DPE Runway Incursion
DPE Runway IncursionDPE Runway Incursion
DPE Runway Incursion
 
FAA Risk Management
FAA Risk ManagementFAA Risk Management
FAA Risk Management
 
Faa safety stand down brochure[hi res]
Faa safety stand down brochure[hi res]Faa safety stand down brochure[hi res]
Faa safety stand down brochure[hi res]
 
Equipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic Control
Equipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic ControlEquipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic Control
Equipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic Control
 
NTSB Presents: Is Your Aircraft Talking to You? Listen!
NTSB Presents: Is Your Aircraft Talking to You? Listen!NTSB Presents: Is Your Aircraft Talking to You? Listen!
NTSB Presents: Is Your Aircraft Talking to You? Listen!
 
Big paper
Big paperBig paper
Big paper
 
FAA Risk Management
FAA Risk ManagementFAA Risk Management
FAA Risk Management
 
NTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require Vigilance
NTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require VigilanceNTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require Vigilance
NTSB Safety Alert: Reduced Visual Reference s Require Vigilance
 
FAA Risk Management
FAA Risk ManagementFAA Risk Management
FAA Risk Management
 
2015 STS - Minimize Your Losses
2015 STS - Minimize Your Losses2015 STS - Minimize Your Losses
2015 STS - Minimize Your Losses
 
Foqa good one
Foqa good oneFoqa good one
Foqa good one
 
Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015
Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015
Helinalysis HFDM Services 2015
 
IHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and Operators
IHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and OperatorsIHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and Operators
IHST Safety Resources for Helicopter Pilots and Operators
 
SMS - Safety Management Systems
SMS - Safety Management SystemsSMS - Safety Management Systems
SMS - Safety Management Systems
 
Human factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&membersHuman factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&members
 

Semelhante a 8AA SMS221 Analysis

Predictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents data
Predictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents dataPredictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents data
Predictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents dataSurya Adavi
 
Predictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents data
Predictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents dataPredictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents data
Predictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents dataAshish Kumar Doke
 
Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05
Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05
Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05syed viquar
 
Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01syed viquar
 
1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systems1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systemsSaiful Chowdhury
 
Aviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth Pol
Aviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth PolAviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth Pol
Aviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth PolAkash Pol
 
Activity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docx
Activity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docxActivity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docx
Activity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docxcoubroughcosta
 
Aviation accidents and incidents
Aviation accidents and incidentsAviation accidents and incidents
Aviation accidents and incidentsstargate1280
 
Available online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docx
Available online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docxAvailable online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docx
Available online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docxcelenarouzie
 
Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...
Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...
Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...Schneider Electric
 

Semelhante a 8AA SMS221 Analysis (20)

Atc
AtcAtc
Atc
 
Reduced Visual Reference Requires Viligance
Reduced Visual Reference Requires ViliganceReduced Visual Reference Requires Viligance
Reduced Visual Reference Requires Viligance
 
Top 10 Causes of FATAL General Aviation Accidents
Top 10 Causes of FATAL General Aviation AccidentsTop 10 Causes of FATAL General Aviation Accidents
Top 10 Causes of FATAL General Aviation Accidents
 
Predictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents data
Predictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents dataPredictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents data
Predictive Analytics - NTSB Aviation accidents data
 
Predictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents data
Predictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents dataPredictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents data
Predictive analytics NTSB aviation accidents data
 
Is your aircraft talking to you? Listen!
Is your aircraft talking to you?  Listen!Is your aircraft talking to you?  Listen!
Is your aircraft talking to you? Listen!
 
Major Aircrash
Major Aircrash Major Aircrash
Major Aircrash
 
Quick History and Notable Successes in Aviation Weather Safety
Quick History and Notable Successes in Aviation Weather SafetyQuick History and Notable Successes in Aviation Weather Safety
Quick History and Notable Successes in Aviation Weather Safety
 
Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude
Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude
Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude
 
Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05
Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05
Media Object File Flt Ops Ops Env Seq05
 
Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Flt Ops Hum Per Seq01
 
Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude
Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low AltitudePrevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude
Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude
 
ICN Victoria: Hosegood on In-Flight Medical Emergencies
ICN Victoria: Hosegood on In-Flight Medical EmergenciesICN Victoria: Hosegood on In-Flight Medical Emergencies
ICN Victoria: Hosegood on In-Flight Medical Emergencies
 
1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systems1. safety instrumented systems
1. safety instrumented systems
 
Aviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth Pol
Aviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth PolAviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth Pol
Aviation Research Project - Akash Siddharth Pol
 
Activity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docx
Activity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docxActivity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docx
Activity 3.4 Tutorial My hypothesis is that the majority o.docx
 
Aviation accidents and incidents
Aviation accidents and incidentsAviation accidents and incidents
Aviation accidents and incidents
 
SMS Recurrent
SMS RecurrentSMS Recurrent
SMS Recurrent
 
Available online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docx
Available online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docxAvailable online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docx
Available online at httpdocs.lib.purdue.edujateJournal.docx
 
Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...
Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...
Understanding the Power of the Schneider Electric Enhanced Flight Hazard Prod...
 

8AA SMS221 Analysis

  • 1. Group Eight - 8AA SMS 221NAA The Data analysis of Southwest Airlines SeyedHamed Jabbari Behnam 016460156 Courtney Young 035044114 Nicoy Davis 111996153
  • 2. Group 8AA SMS221 1 The Data Analysis of Southwest Airlines’ Incidents Risk Level by Aircraft Type: High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk B737-300 5 18 16 B737-500 0 2 2 B737-700 8 22 14 B737-800 1 1 2 In regards to risk level by aircraft type, Southwest’s largest aircraft (B737-800’s) saw the fewest accidents/incidents with low level risk being more frequent. Astonishingly enough, Southwest’s B737-700’s experienced the highest level and medium level incidents. The B737- 500’s reassuringly saw no high level risk incidents and very few medium and low level risk occurrences. Risk Level by Causal Factors: High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk People 4 3 3 Equipment 6 22 25 Environment 4 18 5 Organization 0 0 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 B737-300 B737-500 B737-700 B737-800 NumbersofIncidents Type of Aircraft Risk Level by Aircraft Type High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk
  • 3. Group 8AA SMS221 2 According to the data collected, the airlines equipment seems to be the number one cause for medium and high level risk incidents. Whether there was smoke in the cabin, problematic landing gear or fuel leakage, these all resulted in low to high risk occurrences. Southwest’s organization was responsible for the fewest amount of episodes. In one occurrence, a drone was seen on approach. With good communication however, this event only led to a low level risk incident. Risk Level by Department: High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk Maintenance 9 38 30 Flight Ops. 3 4 2 Commercial 2 1 2 Our findings resulted in Southwest’s maintenance department to be more involved in the airline’s occurrences. This does not necessarily mean that they are at fault for the majority of events, but they are undeniably the department that resolves the issue afterwards. Most incidents result in maintenance ensuring that the aircraft is safe to fly or if it needs to be repaired. Therefore, the amount of low, medium and high risk events that they are involved with is logical. The commercial department and flight operations department do not particularly compare with the maintenance department with the commercial department having the least involvement. 0 5 10 15 20 25 People Equipment Environment Organization High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk Commercial Flight Ops. Maintenance
  • 4. Group 8AA SMS221 3 Risk Level by Flight Phases: High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk APR 1 9 6 ENR 6 7 14 ICL 4 20 10 LDG 2 1 4 TXI 1 2 0 TOF 0 4 0 It is concluded that during the initial climb, Southwest Airlines saw the most accidents/incidents. During this phase of flight is when an engine would fail or the aircraft would strike a bird which were two of the more frequent causal factors. These incidents typically resulted in a low to medium level of risk. Trailing behind, the enroute phase of flight also lead to a few more events than the other phases of flight. This could have been caused by turbulence resulting in injury as it was quite recurrent. Taxiing and take-off could possibly be acknowledged as the safest phase of flight for Southwest Airlines as they both result in zero low level risk occurrences and very few medium level risk incidents. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 APR ENR ICL LDG TXI TOF High level of risk Medium level of risk Low level of risk
  • 5. Group 8AA SMS221 4 OCCURRENCE TYPES: Based on the information gathered the following key findings were determined: 25% of the incidents/ accidents were related to Bird Strikes, while 14% were related system component failures (non power plant) such as Damaged tires, problems with flaps and landing gear, and 12% of cabin related issues varying from smoke smell in cabin to issues with pressurization. 10% were system component failure (power plant) such as one more Engine failures enroute. This might could be due to poor maintenance and an aging fleet.
  • 6. Group 8AA SMS221 5 Conclusion: Thorough analysis of the 90 Aviation Herald Accident reports on Southwest Airlines the following key findings were determined:  25% of accidents/incidents were related to bird strikes.  14% of incidents/accidents were related to system component failures.  Southwest B737-700’s experienced the highest level of medium risk incidents.  The airlines Equipment is at the number causal factor of medium to high level incidents.  The department that saw the most occurrences was maintenance.  The phase of flight in which the accidents were most prone was determined to be the Initial Climb. With 14% of incidents related to system component failures and resulting in equipment being the cause of 22 medium level risk and 6 high level risk, the airline needs to implement better maintenance procedures in relation to aircraft maintenance. The airline also needs to review its SOP as it relates to preflight checks to ensure that its aircraft are truly fit to fly. Some of the challenges faced while compiling the data are as follows:  No consistency in the way data is reported in the AV Herald for example some reports listed total crew and pax separately whilst some reports just listed total souls onboard.  Meticulous caution has to be taken when entering data in order to maintain accuracy.  The weather column was of no use as out of 90 reported incidents only 4 report weather conditions.