6. „…the
process where steering of the
organization takes place through the
systematic definition of mission, strategy
and objectives of the organization, making
these measurable through critical success
factors and key performance indicators, in
order to be able to take corrective actions
to keep the organization on track‟ (Waal,
Goedegebuure, &Geradts, 2011).
7. Performance
management can be
regarded as a systematic process by
which the overall performance of an
organization can be improved by improving
the performance of individuals within a
team framework (Singh, 2012).
8. Effective
performance managementinvolving a complete system of goal
setting, training, communication, and
ongoing feedback-is a practice on which
research often has important implications
(Helm, Courtney L, Frank R, & Christine,
2007).
9. PM
is “something that people actually do
and can be observed . . . Performance is
what the organization hires one to do, and
do well. Performance is not the
consequence or result of action, it is the
action itself” (W. Smither& London, 2009).
14.
Increase motivation to perform
Increase self-esteem
Clarify definitions of
job
success criteria
Enhance self-insight and development
Motivation, commitment and intentions to
stay in the organization are enhanced
15. Managers
gain insight about
subordinates
Employees become more competent
Better and more timely differentiation
between good and poor performers
Communicate supervisors’ views of
performance more clearly
16. Organizational
goals are made clear
Fairer and more appropriate
administrative actions
Better protection from lawsuits
Facilitate organizational change
17.
18. - Lowered self-esteem
- Employee burnout and job
dissatisfaction
• - Damaged relationships
- Use of false or misleading
information
•
•
•
19. Increased
turnover
Decreased motivation to perform
Unjustified demands on managers’
resources
Varying and unfair standards and
ratings
20. Wasted
time and money
Unclear ratings system
Emerging biases
Increased risk of litigation
21.
22. Motivation to obtain
rewards is one of the
fundamental drives
underlying much of both
human and non-human
animal behavior
(Christian & Ian, 2008).
Reward systems can
shape the behavior of
employees within the
organization (Suliyanto,
2011)
23. Set of mechanisms for distributing
Tangible returns
and
Intangible
or relational returns
As part of an employment relationship
26. Relational
returns, such as
Recognition and status
Employment security
Challenging work
Learning opportunities
27.
28. Base Pay
Cost of Living
Adjustment
and Contingent
Pay
Short-term
Incentives
Long-term
Incentives
Income
Protection
Work/Life
Focus
Allowances
Relational
Returns
31. Link
individual goals with
organization’s goals
Communicate most crucial
business strategic initiatives
32. Provide
information for making
decisions:
i.
Salary adjustments
ii.
Promotions
iii.
Retention or termination
iv.
Recognition of individual
performance
v.
Layoffs
41. All
employees are evaluated
All major job responsibilities are
evaluated
Evaluations cover performance for
entire review period
Feedback is given on both positive
and negative performance
43. Standards
are important and relevant
System measures ONLY what employee
can control
Results have consequences
Evaluations occur regularly and at
appropriate times
System provides for continuing skill
development of evaluators
44. Concrete and detailed guidance to
employees
• What’s expected
• How to meet the expectations
45. Distinguish
between effective and
ineffective
• Behaviors
• Results
Provide
ability to identify employees
with various levels of performance
47. -
Relevant (measures what is
important)
- Not deficient (doesn’t measure
unimportant facets of job)
- Not contaminated (only measures
what the employee can control)
48. Perception
of Distributive Justice
• Work performed Evaluation received
Reward
Perception
of Procedural Justice
• Fairness of procedures used to:
Determine ratings
Link ratings to rewards
49. Represents
concerns of all
involved
• When system is created,
employees should help with
deciding
What should be measured
How it should be measured
• Employee should provide input on
performance prior to evaluation
meeting
50. Frequent,
ongoing evaluations and
feedback
2-way communications in appraisal
meeting
Clear standards, ongoing
communication
Communications are factual, open,
honest
52. Ongoing
training of managers to
provide
Consistent evaluations across
• People
• Time
53. Supervisor
suppresses self-interest
Supervisor rates only where she has
sufficient information about the
performance dimension
Supervisor respects employee
privacy
56. Counterproductive
work behavior
(CWB) has been defined as “volitional
acts that harm or intend to harm
organizations and their stakeholders (for
example, clients, co-workers, customers,
and supervisors)” (Atwater & Elkins, 2009).
57. 1. Abuse against Others
Incivility
Workplace Aggression/Violence
Sexual Harassment
2. Production Deviance
Passive Production Deviance
Sabotage and Theft
Withdrawal
58. 1.
2.
Non - Punitive Approaches
Alignment
Corrective Feedback
Self - Management Training for
Improving Job Performance
3.
Punishment
4.
Termination
59. 1. Determine whether there are legal issues that
should be taken into account.
2. Consider only work - related factors.
3. Apply policies and decision - making rules
consistently.
4. Allow employees a voice in the discipline
process.
5. Make the punishment consistent with the
severity of the offense.
6. Communicate clear performance expectations.
7. Provide employees with sufficient time to
improve their performance or change their
behavior.