SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 43
Feasibility Analysis:
Species-specific Nucleic
Acid Detection Probe for
Fungi
JOHNS HOPKINS CAREY BUSINESS SCHOOL
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
KELLY LEBRUN, NAZLI MEREY, TOLU OLORUNTOBA, GREGORY
PETROSSIAN, MEGAN WARD
Agenda
Overview
• Case Report
• Value Proposition
• Problem
Statement
Analysis
• Current Treatment
Outline
• Invention
Overview
• Competitive
Advantage
• 9 Market Forces
• Stakeholder
Analysis
Market
Strategy
• IP Status
• Potential
Licensees
• Out-licensing
Terms
• Licensing Funding
Needs
• Business Model
Financial
Strategy
• Market Size
• Price
• Revenue
Projection
• Milestones
• 5 Year Projection
Conclusions
• Patent
Considerations
• Recommendations
2OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Case Report
Patient
C.D.
70-year-
old retiree
August 2015
Double lung transplant
at UPMC with
immune-suppressing
drugs
September,
2015
Acquired fungal
infection while
inpatient
Fall 2015
Several lung
surgeries for
infection control
January 2016
C.D. and family
file lawsuit
against UPMC
February 7th, 2016
C.D. dies
3OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Value Proposition
A rapid diagnostic test for fungal infections that cause sepsis in
immunocompromised patients.
Detecting fungal infections quicker and more accurately
improves patient outcomes and reduces cost.
4OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Problem Statement
5
Immunocompromised
patients susceptible to
infections
Fungal infections
are most
common in
hospital
High mortality
rate
(58-99%)
Delay in
diagnosis
increases
mortality
Late
diagnosis
increases
healthcare
costs
Cancer, trauma,
burns, HIV,
organ, BMT
Reference: Swu-Jane L, Schranz, J and Teutsch, S. Aspergillosis Case-Fatality Rate: Systematic Review of the Literature. Clinical Infectious Disease. (32) 3, p. 358-366.
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Current Treatment Timeline
6
Reference: 1. Kumar. Chest, Nov. 2009, p. 1237-1248
2. Kumar et al. Crit Care Med 2006 Jun 34(6):1589-96
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Invention Overview
• DNA-based probe that detects fungal infection in a patient’s
bloodstream
• Offers rapid diagnosis for targeted treatment
• Probe can be utilized with different methods:
• In Situ PCR
• In Situ Hybridization
• MR/Nano technology
7OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Competitive Advantage
Higher
Sensitivity
(approx. ~
45% greater)
Rapid
Diagnostic
(4-10 hours
vs. 2-4 days)
Reduction in
Drug Toxicity
Reduction in
Drug
Resistance
Reduction in
Unnecessary
Treatment
Cost Savings:
$500 per
patient
Reduction in
Length of
Stay
(approx.~ 9
days less in
ICU/GW
Cost Savings:
$30,000
8
Reference: Bilir, S. P., Ferrufino, C. P., Pfaller, M. A., et al. (2015). The economic impact of rapid Candida species identification by T2Candida among high-risk patients. Future microbiology, (10) 7,1133-1144.
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
9 Market Forces
9OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Stakeholder Analysis
Hospitals
•Patient care and cost
savings
Clinicians
•Patient outcomes and
safety
Inventors
•Time to horizon
NIH Patent Office
•Time /money consideration
Academic medical
institutions
•Could help or hurt related
to power to influence
Licensees
•Biotech companies (i.e.
Roche, Abbott, etc.)
Advocacy Groups
•For immunocompromised
patients
Insurance payors
•Reimbursement of testing
Investors
•Capital funding
10OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Patent Landscape
Intellectual Property:
• U.S. Pat: 6,372,430 issued 2002-04-16
• U.S. Pat: 7,052,836 issued 2006-05-30
• US Application No. 09/423,233
• US Application No. 10/046,955
• Foreign Patent: 96/21741 July 1996
• Canada, Spain, UK, Germany, Austria,
• Japan (discontinued)
Inventors:
• Christine Morrison (CDC)
• Errol Reiss (CDC)
• Lilianna Aidorevich (CDC)
• Jong Soo Choi (CDC)
Current Assignee:
• Government of United States of America, ℅ CDC TTO
11
Reference: http://www.ott.nih.gov/technology/E-232-2013
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Intellectual Property Status
12
Nucleic acids for detecting
Aspergillus species and
other filamentous fungi
(US 6372430 B1)
Nucleic acids for detecting
fusarium species
(US 7052836 B2)
Compositions and methods
for the detection of Candida
species
(US 8119788 B2)
Methods for the
differentiation and
identification of medically
important endemic fungi
(US 7427472 B2)
Molecular identification of
Aspergillus species
(US 7384741 B2)
Molecular identification of
Aspergillus species
(US 7871779 B2)
1997 2001 2002 2005 2016 2017 2021 2022 2025
Patent Expiry: 2017
Reference: http://www.uspto.gov/
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Potential Licensees
13
Molecular Diagnostic
Biotech Companies
Molecular Diagnostic
Reagent Companies
Academic
Institutions
Biotech
Startups
*
*
JUSTIFICATION: Market Leaders in Diagnostic Testing, Reagents, and Academic Institutions
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Out-Licensing Terms
Apply for
exclusive license
or sub-license
Establish
performance
benchmarks
Submit business plan
Negotiate
licensing terms
Report
utilization
annually
14OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Licensing Funding Needs
Royalty Rate of 1.5%
Sublicensing Royalty Rate of 15%
Tiered Execution Royalty
15OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Business Model
Type of Model: Business-to-Business Licensing
Value Architecture: An Aspergillus DNA probe
available as a part of kit for a battery of
microbiological tests for high risk patients
Value Network: Network of suppliers and users of
medical diagnostic devices
Value Finance: Medicare & privately insured patients,
payment for the 3 reimbursable species of Aspergillus
16OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
US Market Size
Sepsis Cost
$20 B
Diagnostic
Market $5.2 B
Total Revenue
$900 M
Reimbursement
Opportunity
$285 M
17
Prevalence: 1.89 M patients
US hospitals
Reimbursement Price: $150
($50 for 3 species)
https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Education/pages/factsheet_sepsis.aspx
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Pricing Range
18
Reference: Masters, Ronald. Quest Diagnostics. Personal Interview. 21 March 2016.
Traditional
Diagnostics
Blood Culture
$40
Rapid
Diagnostics
PCR/bDG
$150
Rapid
Diagnostics
T2 test
$250
Reimbursement: $50-$150
CMS reimburses 3 of the 10 species under patent up to $50 each = $150 total
Recommendation: Price $150-$250 per test until further CPT codes developed for rapid diagnostics
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Potential Revenue Projection
($ Millions) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Revenue
Opportunity
$285.00 $324.05 $368.44 $418.92 $476.31 $1,872.71
Conservative Market
Capture
2% 4% 8% 10% 15%
Conservative
Projected Revenue
$5.70 $12.96 $29.48 $41.89 $71.45 $161.47
Aggressive Market
Capture
3% 6% 10% 15% 22.50%
Aggressive Projected
Revenue
$8.55 $19.44 $36.84 $62.84 $107.17 $234.84
19
Revenue Opportunity CAGR 13.7%
Projected Potential Revenue by Year 5: ($161.47 + $234.84)/ 2 = $198.16 Million
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Milestones: Commercialization
Raising Capital (private,
government, donors)
Sublicense to
Manufacturer
Collect Royalty Payments
from Manufacturer
Pay Royalties to NIH
20
• Seek FDA approval for a Part 866
(Microbiology) Class II device
• Premarketing notification 510(k)
submission to FDA
• Similarity to other fungal DNA
probes 90 days before marketing
• 510(k) assessment fee for small
businesses = $2,614
Product Development Milestones
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
NIH Revenue 5-Year Projection
Projected Total
Revenue by Year 5:
$198.16 M
$10 cost per $50
species test = 20%
operational cost
$198.16 M - $39.63 M =
$158.53 M profit
Projected Total Profit
by Year 5 for Sub-
Licensee: $158.53 M
Projected Royalties from
Licensee (25%): $39.62 M
•Projected Royalties from Small
Business (15%):
$5.95 M
Projected Royalties from
Large Biotech (1.5%):
$2.38 M
21
Sub-license
Exclusive license
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Patent Considerations
Not a stand-alone product
Difficult to enforce IP (substitute products)
Patent protection horizon only 1 year
Unable to recoup R&D investment
22
Advise Non-Renewal of Patent
OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
Recommendations Moving Forward
Donate
intellectual
property
Research
institutions
Health-
related
nonprofits
Release
intellectual
property to
public domain
23OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
THANK YOU
References
25
• https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Education/pages/factsheet_sepsis.aspx
• http://www.world-sepsis-day.org/CONTENTPIC/2015_WSD_FactSheet_long_English.pdf
• http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/molecular-diagnostics-technologies-
global-markets-report-bio063c.html, Molecular Diagnostics: Technologies and Global Markets
• Code - BIO063C, Published - June 2015, Analyst - Jon Evans, Category – Biotechnology
• IBIS World, accessed on April 13, 2016, at www.ibisworld.com/reports/us/industry/ataglance
• Raffery, M, A.(2007). Managing change in biotech: mergers and acquisitions. Nature Biotechnology 25,
689 (2007)
• Masters, Ronald. Quest Diagnostics. Personal Interview. 21 March 2016.
• Scaffer, D. In Licencing as Business Model. Retrieved from
http://www.nature.com/bioent/2003/030101/full/nbt0602supp-BE36.html
• Udemy Content Library, accessed on April 13, 2016, at blog.udemy.com/types-of-market-
segmentation
APPENDIX
26
Current Standard of Diagnosis
Current Standard: Blood Culture
• Blood volume: problematic for critically ill & pediatric
patients
• Low sensitivity: blood culture is 50-60% accurate
• Time to result: 2 - 6 days
Alternative Option: Biopsy
• Invasive procedure
27
Scope of Invention
Enabling
Technology
• Probe is used
with diagnostic
tools (can’t be
used otherwise)
Combination
Technology
• Reagent
companies could
license parts of
the diagnostic
tool
Sustaining
Technology
• Rapid/accurate
diagnosis
improving patient
outcomes,
decreasing
unnecessary
treatment and
costs
28
Scope of Invention
29
What is a DNA probe?
• Marker to identify a target within a
biological sample
What is our technology based on?
• Genetic engineering → process of
identifying DNA, and manipulating in the
laboratory for targeted results
Business Model
•Business-to-Business Licensing
Type of Model
•A fungal diagnostic component sold by licensee to hospitals with patients who are immunocompromised
•Rapid Diagnosis
•Improved patient outcomes
•Reduces cost
Value Proposition
•Making an Aspergillus DNA probe available as a part of kit for a battery of microbiological tests for at risk patients
Value Architecture
•Network of suppliers and users of medical diagnostic devices
Value Network
•For Medicare & insured patients, payment for the 3 reimbursable species of Aspergillus; out-of-pocket payers
Value Finance
30
Management Structure
31
Board of Directors
Management
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer
Chief Scientific Officer Chief Medical Officer General Counsel
Corporate Development Engineering
Funding Source – Product Development
Impact Investment & Accelerator Programs
The Alvin and Fanny B. Thalheimer Foundation
McArthur Foundation
Abell Foundation
32
Milestones: Start Up Considerations
Legal
Incorporation
Tax and
Administrative
Formation of
Board
Formation of
Managing
Team
Strategic and
Marketing
Planning
Agreements
with
Manufacturers
Distribution
Arrangements
33
Commercialization Timeline
34
FDA PMA Filing
Stakeholder Outreach
Clinical Trials Mass Production
Hire Management TeamEstablish Board of DirectorsLicensing and Funding
Incorporation
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Prototype
Now Patent Expiry
Start-Up Projected Revenue
Incorporation
Fixed Setup
Cost:
$200
FDA
Fixed
Regulatory
Costs:
$2,600
Admin &
Marketing
Annual Cost:
$500,000
Operating
Cost
Reimbursement
Cost: $150
Manufacturing
Cost: $48
NIH royalty: $15
Profit: $87
Prevalence
1.89 M
patients/year
Positive Cash
Flow
164 M
35
5 Year Revenue Forecast
Potential & Competitive Map
36
US Market Size
• PCR Molecular Diagnostics
Total Global Market
• $5.2 Billion
• Sepsis cost US hospitals $20
Billion in 2011
37
Total Revenue Opportunity = $900 M
Reimbursable Revenue Opportunity = $285 M
Reimbursable
Price: $150
Total Diagnostic
Price: $500
Prevalence
Primary 1.36 M +
Secondary .54 M
= 1.89 M
Global Market Size Overview
38
Oncology
21%
Identity/paternity
28%
Pre/postnatal
screening
6%
Infectious disease
45%
GLOBAL PCR MARKET SHARE FOR
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS BY PCR (%)
0.00
5,000.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
20,000.00
25,000.00
2012 2013 2014 2015 2020
Global Market for Molecular Diagnostics by Technology ($ Million)
PCR Microarrays In Situ Hybridization Biochip Other
PCR
Application
2012 2013 2014 2015 2020
CAGR%
2015-
2020
Infectious
Disease
3,227.4 3,783.6 4,435.6 5,200.0 9,900.0 13.7
Appendix: Market Segmentation
39
Product Segment: Molecular diagnostics and pathology
DNA analysis for:
Infectious diseases, oncology, pre/post natal screening,
etc.
Industry Segment: Hospitals and laboratories
Patients, clinical care providers, and basic scientists
Considerations when Identifying Segments → measureable,
large, and stable
Udemy Content Library, accessed on April 13, 2016, at blog.udemy.com/types-of-market-segmentation
Appendix: Target Segment
40
Molecular Diagnostic
• Specific product to detect and identify fungal infections
• Clearly defined group of end-users
• Applicable to numerous pathology segments
• Clinical, general, and anatomic
IBIS World, accessed on April 13, 2016, at www.ibisworld.com/reports/us/industry/ataglance
Appendix: Buyers- End Users
41
Fungus Diagnostic Reagents/Biotech companies Hospital Labs Patients
Reagent/Biotech Companies Hospital Labs Patients
- Large Biotech and Reagents
Companies interested in
licencing or that want to
deveop product segments
(low risk, low cost )
Eg: Biogen, Agilent Technologies.
- Hospital Labs with limited
budget
- Hospital Labs in the
developing countries (India,
Africa, South East Asia)
- International NGOs that
offer healthcare services to
underserved populations
(eg: MSF, Project Hope,
Partners in Health)
- Immunocompromised
patients
- Pre/post natal
- Long stay at the hospitals
Appendix: Global Market
42
Technology 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020
CAGR%
2015-2020
PCR 7,794.3 8,861.7 10,082.6 11,480.0 19,450.0 11.1
Microarrays 3,712.2 4,310.7 5,007.8 5,820.0 10,330.0 12.2
In Situ
Hybridization
2,801.2 3,313.3 3,923.1 4,650.0 8,600.0 13.1
Biochip 1,697.6 2,053.1 2,485.0 3,010.0 6,470.0 16.5
Other 103.5 129.0 160.6 200.0 400.0 14.9
Total 16,108.8 18,667.8 21,659.1 25,160.0 45,250.0 12.5
GLOBAL MARKET FOR MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS BY TECHNOLOGY ($ MILLIONS)
Appendix: Price
• Prevalence of Sepsis in US 2015
• Primary = 1.36 Million
• Secondary = 0.54 Million
• Total Diagnostic Price $500
• $50 per species
• 10 total species under patent
• Reimbursable Price $150
• $50 per species
• only 3 species reimbursable
43

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...
Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...
Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...
Golden Helix
 
AMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinical
AMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinicalAMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinical
AMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinical
Golden Helix
 
Building Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden Helix
Building Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden HelixBuilding Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden Helix
Building Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden Helix
Golden Helix
 
Using Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer Testing
Using Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer TestingUsing Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer Testing
Using Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer Testing
Golden Helix
 
Scientia Advisors Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008
Scientia Advisors   Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008Scientia Advisors   Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008
Scientia Advisors Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008
glorikian
 
Efficient Application of NGS Family-Based Analysis
Efficient Application of NGS Family-Based AnalysisEfficient Application of NGS Family-Based Analysis
Efficient Application of NGS Family-Based Analysis
Golden Helix
 
Exploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline Workflow
Exploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline WorkflowExploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline Workflow
Exploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline Workflow
Golden Helix
 
VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...
VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...
VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...
Golden Helix
 
Updates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation Sources
Updates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation SourcesUpdates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation Sources
Updates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation Sources
Delaina Hawkins
 

Mais procurados (20)

Creating & Managing Reusable Gene Lists with VSClinical
Creating & Managing Reusable Gene Lists with VSClinicalCreating & Managing Reusable Gene Lists with VSClinical
Creating & Managing Reusable Gene Lists with VSClinical
 
Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...
Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...
Exome Analysis with VS-CNV and VSClinical: Updated Strategies and Expanded Ca...
 
AMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinical
AMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinicalAMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinical
AMP-Based Variant Classification with VSClinical
 
Processing Hereditary Cancer Panels in VarSeq
Processing Hereditary Cancer Panels in VarSeqProcessing Hereditary Cancer Panels in VarSeq
Processing Hereditary Cancer Panels in VarSeq
 
Building Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden Helix
Building Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden HelixBuilding Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden Helix
Building Secure Analysis and Storage Systems with Golden Helix
 
Using Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer Testing
Using Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer TestingUsing Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer Testing
Using Golden Helix CancerKB to Accelerate NGS Cancer Testing
 
Scientia Advisors Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008
Scientia Advisors   Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008Scientia Advisors   Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008
Scientia Advisors Impact Of Microarray In M Dx Oct 2008
 
Golden Helix's End-to-End Solution for Clinical Labs
Golden Helix's End-to-End Solution for Clinical LabsGolden Helix's End-to-End Solution for Clinical Labs
Golden Helix's End-to-End Solution for Clinical Labs
 
Bioexpert network have evalutionized of ArtGen
Bioexpert network have evalutionized of ArtGen Bioexpert network have evalutionized of ArtGen
Bioexpert network have evalutionized of ArtGen
 
Pressure BioScience Presentation January 2017
Pressure BioScience Presentation January 2017Pressure BioScience Presentation January 2017
Pressure BioScience Presentation January 2017
 
Efficient Application of NGS Family-Based Analysis
Efficient Application of NGS Family-Based AnalysisEfficient Application of NGS Family-Based Analysis
Efficient Application of NGS Family-Based Analysis
 
Clinical Reporting Made Easy
Clinical Reporting Made EasyClinical Reporting Made Easy
Clinical Reporting Made Easy
 
Discovery to market
Discovery to marketDiscovery to market
Discovery to market
 
Genetic Technologies Presentation - January 2021
Genetic Technologies Presentation -  January 2021Genetic Technologies Presentation -  January 2021
Genetic Technologies Presentation - January 2021
 
Exploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline Workflow
Exploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline WorkflowExploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline Workflow
Exploring New Features and Clinical Reports in the ACMG Guideline Workflow
 
VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...
VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...
VSClinical: First Commercial Product to Integrate the Updated ACMG Guidelines...
 
Advanced Report Customization via VSClinical
Advanced Report Customization via VSClinicalAdvanced Report Customization via VSClinical
Advanced Report Customization via VSClinical
 
Updates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation Sources
Updates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation SourcesUpdates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation Sources
Updates to VSClinical ACMG Guidelines & a Tour of Cancer Annotation Sources
 
Amarantus Bioscience Holdings Presentation
Amarantus Bioscience Holdings PresentationAmarantus Bioscience Holdings Presentation
Amarantus Bioscience Holdings Presentation
 
Behavioral Economics and Managment of Pharmaceutical QbD 25 August 2016
Behavioral Economics and Managment of Pharmaceutical QbD 25 August 2016Behavioral Economics and Managment of Pharmaceutical QbD 25 August 2016
Behavioral Economics and Managment of Pharmaceutical QbD 25 August 2016
 

Semelhante a D2M Final Presentation Submission for LinkedIn

Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?
Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?
Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?
Office of Health Economics
 

Semelhante a D2M Final Presentation Submission for LinkedIn (20)

Business-led Translation A presentation by CEO, Keith Thompson, about growing...
Business-led Translation A presentation by CEO, Keith Thompson, about growing...Business-led Translation A presentation by CEO, Keith Thompson, about growing...
Business-led Translation A presentation by CEO, Keith Thompson, about growing...
 
Commercial considerations in early drug development
Commercial considerations in early drug developmentCommercial considerations in early drug development
Commercial considerations in early drug development
 
Leading Molecules to Market - An overview on licensing
 Leading Molecules to Market - An overview on licensing Leading Molecules to Market - An overview on licensing
Leading Molecules to Market - An overview on licensing
 
Cgix 201506
Cgix 201506Cgix 201506
Cgix 201506
 
Cost on development of new drug
Cost on development of new drugCost on development of new drug
Cost on development of new drug
 
Clinical Recruitment Planning Strategies
Clinical Recruitment Planning StrategiesClinical Recruitment Planning Strategies
Clinical Recruitment Planning Strategies
 
Genetic Technologies Investor Presentation September 2022
Genetic Technologies Investor Presentation September 2022Genetic Technologies Investor Presentation September 2022
Genetic Technologies Investor Presentation September 2022
 
CGIX Investor presentation
CGIX Investor presentationCGIX Investor presentation
CGIX Investor presentation
 
Advanced Medical Isotope Corp. Presentation
Advanced Medical Isotope Corp. PresentationAdvanced Medical Isotope Corp. Presentation
Advanced Medical Isotope Corp. Presentation
 
Advanced Medical Isotope Corp. Presentation
Advanced Medical Isotope Corp. PresentationAdvanced Medical Isotope Corp. Presentation
Advanced Medical Isotope Corp. Presentation
 
Cgix presentation 20150902
Cgix presentation 20150902Cgix presentation 20150902
Cgix presentation 20150902
 
Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?
Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?
Economic Incentives for New Antibiotics: What's Required?
 
Cgix
CgixCgix
Cgix
 
The Role of clinical Research in Pharmaceuticals Industry
The Role of clinical Research in Pharmaceuticals IndustryThe Role of clinical Research in Pharmaceuticals Industry
The Role of clinical Research in Pharmaceuticals Industry
 
Kostaras nikos general manager ims
Kostaras nikos general manager imsKostaras nikos general manager ims
Kostaras nikos general manager ims
 
Can-Fite BioPharma - Investor Presentation December 2020
Can-Fite BioPharma - Investor Presentation December 2020Can-Fite BioPharma - Investor Presentation December 2020
Can-Fite BioPharma - Investor Presentation December 2020
 
Marketplace positioning and preliminary Market forecast
Marketplace positioning and preliminary Market forecast Marketplace positioning and preliminary Market forecast
Marketplace positioning and preliminary Market forecast
 
What's In An Idea-Chanda-UofT Life Science Coach
What's In An Idea-Chanda-UofT Life Science CoachWhat's In An Idea-Chanda-UofT Life Science Coach
What's In An Idea-Chanda-UofT Life Science Coach
 
Quality, Risk & Compliance: Risk Management for Sponsors, Site, and CROs
Quality, Risk & Compliance: Risk Management for Sponsors, Site, and CROsQuality, Risk & Compliance: Risk Management for Sponsors, Site, and CROs
Quality, Risk & Compliance: Risk Management for Sponsors, Site, and CROs
 
Pushing the Innovation Envelope: Strategies for Boosting Productivity and ROI...
Pushing the Innovation Envelope: Strategies for Boosting Productivity and ROI...Pushing the Innovation Envelope: Strategies for Boosting Productivity and ROI...
Pushing the Innovation Envelope: Strategies for Boosting Productivity and ROI...
 

D2M Final Presentation Submission for LinkedIn

  • 1. Feasibility Analysis: Species-specific Nucleic Acid Detection Probe for Fungi JOHNS HOPKINS CAREY BUSINESS SCHOOL NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH KELLY LEBRUN, NAZLI MEREY, TOLU OLORUNTOBA, GREGORY PETROSSIAN, MEGAN WARD
  • 2. Agenda Overview • Case Report • Value Proposition • Problem Statement Analysis • Current Treatment Outline • Invention Overview • Competitive Advantage • 9 Market Forces • Stakeholder Analysis Market Strategy • IP Status • Potential Licensees • Out-licensing Terms • Licensing Funding Needs • Business Model Financial Strategy • Market Size • Price • Revenue Projection • Milestones • 5 Year Projection Conclusions • Patent Considerations • Recommendations 2OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 3. Case Report Patient C.D. 70-year- old retiree August 2015 Double lung transplant at UPMC with immune-suppressing drugs September, 2015 Acquired fungal infection while inpatient Fall 2015 Several lung surgeries for infection control January 2016 C.D. and family file lawsuit against UPMC February 7th, 2016 C.D. dies 3OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 4. Value Proposition A rapid diagnostic test for fungal infections that cause sepsis in immunocompromised patients. Detecting fungal infections quicker and more accurately improves patient outcomes and reduces cost. 4OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 5. Problem Statement 5 Immunocompromised patients susceptible to infections Fungal infections are most common in hospital High mortality rate (58-99%) Delay in diagnosis increases mortality Late diagnosis increases healthcare costs Cancer, trauma, burns, HIV, organ, BMT Reference: Swu-Jane L, Schranz, J and Teutsch, S. Aspergillosis Case-Fatality Rate: Systematic Review of the Literature. Clinical Infectious Disease. (32) 3, p. 358-366. OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 6. Current Treatment Timeline 6 Reference: 1. Kumar. Chest, Nov. 2009, p. 1237-1248 2. Kumar et al. Crit Care Med 2006 Jun 34(6):1589-96 OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 7. Invention Overview • DNA-based probe that detects fungal infection in a patient’s bloodstream • Offers rapid diagnosis for targeted treatment • Probe can be utilized with different methods: • In Situ PCR • In Situ Hybridization • MR/Nano technology 7OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 8. Competitive Advantage Higher Sensitivity (approx. ~ 45% greater) Rapid Diagnostic (4-10 hours vs. 2-4 days) Reduction in Drug Toxicity Reduction in Drug Resistance Reduction in Unnecessary Treatment Cost Savings: $500 per patient Reduction in Length of Stay (approx.~ 9 days less in ICU/GW Cost Savings: $30,000 8 Reference: Bilir, S. P., Ferrufino, C. P., Pfaller, M. A., et al. (2015). The economic impact of rapid Candida species identification by T2Candida among high-risk patients. Future microbiology, (10) 7,1133-1144. OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 9. 9 Market Forces 9OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 10. Stakeholder Analysis Hospitals •Patient care and cost savings Clinicians •Patient outcomes and safety Inventors •Time to horizon NIH Patent Office •Time /money consideration Academic medical institutions •Could help or hurt related to power to influence Licensees •Biotech companies (i.e. Roche, Abbott, etc.) Advocacy Groups •For immunocompromised patients Insurance payors •Reimbursement of testing Investors •Capital funding 10OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 11. Patent Landscape Intellectual Property: • U.S. Pat: 6,372,430 issued 2002-04-16 • U.S. Pat: 7,052,836 issued 2006-05-30 • US Application No. 09/423,233 • US Application No. 10/046,955 • Foreign Patent: 96/21741 July 1996 • Canada, Spain, UK, Germany, Austria, • Japan (discontinued) Inventors: • Christine Morrison (CDC) • Errol Reiss (CDC) • Lilianna Aidorevich (CDC) • Jong Soo Choi (CDC) Current Assignee: • Government of United States of America, ℅ CDC TTO 11 Reference: http://www.ott.nih.gov/technology/E-232-2013 OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 12. Intellectual Property Status 12 Nucleic acids for detecting Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi (US 6372430 B1) Nucleic acids for detecting fusarium species (US 7052836 B2) Compositions and methods for the detection of Candida species (US 8119788 B2) Methods for the differentiation and identification of medically important endemic fungi (US 7427472 B2) Molecular identification of Aspergillus species (US 7384741 B2) Molecular identification of Aspergillus species (US 7871779 B2) 1997 2001 2002 2005 2016 2017 2021 2022 2025 Patent Expiry: 2017 Reference: http://www.uspto.gov/ OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 13. Potential Licensees 13 Molecular Diagnostic Biotech Companies Molecular Diagnostic Reagent Companies Academic Institutions Biotech Startups * * JUSTIFICATION: Market Leaders in Diagnostic Testing, Reagents, and Academic Institutions OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 14. Out-Licensing Terms Apply for exclusive license or sub-license Establish performance benchmarks Submit business plan Negotiate licensing terms Report utilization annually 14OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 15. Licensing Funding Needs Royalty Rate of 1.5% Sublicensing Royalty Rate of 15% Tiered Execution Royalty 15OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 16. Business Model Type of Model: Business-to-Business Licensing Value Architecture: An Aspergillus DNA probe available as a part of kit for a battery of microbiological tests for high risk patients Value Network: Network of suppliers and users of medical diagnostic devices Value Finance: Medicare & privately insured patients, payment for the 3 reimbursable species of Aspergillus 16OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 17. US Market Size Sepsis Cost $20 B Diagnostic Market $5.2 B Total Revenue $900 M Reimbursement Opportunity $285 M 17 Prevalence: 1.89 M patients US hospitals Reimbursement Price: $150 ($50 for 3 species) https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Education/pages/factsheet_sepsis.aspx OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 18. Pricing Range 18 Reference: Masters, Ronald. Quest Diagnostics. Personal Interview. 21 March 2016. Traditional Diagnostics Blood Culture $40 Rapid Diagnostics PCR/bDG $150 Rapid Diagnostics T2 test $250 Reimbursement: $50-$150 CMS reimburses 3 of the 10 species under patent up to $50 each = $150 total Recommendation: Price $150-$250 per test until further CPT codes developed for rapid diagnostics OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 19. Potential Revenue Projection ($ Millions) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenue Opportunity $285.00 $324.05 $368.44 $418.92 $476.31 $1,872.71 Conservative Market Capture 2% 4% 8% 10% 15% Conservative Projected Revenue $5.70 $12.96 $29.48 $41.89 $71.45 $161.47 Aggressive Market Capture 3% 6% 10% 15% 22.50% Aggressive Projected Revenue $8.55 $19.44 $36.84 $62.84 $107.17 $234.84 19 Revenue Opportunity CAGR 13.7% Projected Potential Revenue by Year 5: ($161.47 + $234.84)/ 2 = $198.16 Million OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 20. Milestones: Commercialization Raising Capital (private, government, donors) Sublicense to Manufacturer Collect Royalty Payments from Manufacturer Pay Royalties to NIH 20 • Seek FDA approval for a Part 866 (Microbiology) Class II device • Premarketing notification 510(k) submission to FDA • Similarity to other fungal DNA probes 90 days before marketing • 510(k) assessment fee for small businesses = $2,614 Product Development Milestones OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 21. NIH Revenue 5-Year Projection Projected Total Revenue by Year 5: $198.16 M $10 cost per $50 species test = 20% operational cost $198.16 M - $39.63 M = $158.53 M profit Projected Total Profit by Year 5 for Sub- Licensee: $158.53 M Projected Royalties from Licensee (25%): $39.62 M •Projected Royalties from Small Business (15%): $5.95 M Projected Royalties from Large Biotech (1.5%): $2.38 M 21 Sub-license Exclusive license OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 22. Patent Considerations Not a stand-alone product Difficult to enforce IP (substitute products) Patent protection horizon only 1 year Unable to recoup R&D investment 22 Advise Non-Renewal of Patent OVERVIEW ANALYSIS STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONCLUSION
  • 25. References 25 • https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Education/pages/factsheet_sepsis.aspx • http://www.world-sepsis-day.org/CONTENTPIC/2015_WSD_FactSheet_long_English.pdf • http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/molecular-diagnostics-technologies- global-markets-report-bio063c.html, Molecular Diagnostics: Technologies and Global Markets • Code - BIO063C, Published - June 2015, Analyst - Jon Evans, Category – Biotechnology • IBIS World, accessed on April 13, 2016, at www.ibisworld.com/reports/us/industry/ataglance • Raffery, M, A.(2007). Managing change in biotech: mergers and acquisitions. Nature Biotechnology 25, 689 (2007) • Masters, Ronald. Quest Diagnostics. Personal Interview. 21 March 2016. • Scaffer, D. In Licencing as Business Model. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/bioent/2003/030101/full/nbt0602supp-BE36.html • Udemy Content Library, accessed on April 13, 2016, at blog.udemy.com/types-of-market- segmentation
  • 27. Current Standard of Diagnosis Current Standard: Blood Culture • Blood volume: problematic for critically ill & pediatric patients • Low sensitivity: blood culture is 50-60% accurate • Time to result: 2 - 6 days Alternative Option: Biopsy • Invasive procedure 27
  • 28. Scope of Invention Enabling Technology • Probe is used with diagnostic tools (can’t be used otherwise) Combination Technology • Reagent companies could license parts of the diagnostic tool Sustaining Technology • Rapid/accurate diagnosis improving patient outcomes, decreasing unnecessary treatment and costs 28
  • 29. Scope of Invention 29 What is a DNA probe? • Marker to identify a target within a biological sample What is our technology based on? • Genetic engineering → process of identifying DNA, and manipulating in the laboratory for targeted results
  • 30. Business Model •Business-to-Business Licensing Type of Model •A fungal diagnostic component sold by licensee to hospitals with patients who are immunocompromised •Rapid Diagnosis •Improved patient outcomes •Reduces cost Value Proposition •Making an Aspergillus DNA probe available as a part of kit for a battery of microbiological tests for at risk patients Value Architecture •Network of suppliers and users of medical diagnostic devices Value Network •For Medicare & insured patients, payment for the 3 reimbursable species of Aspergillus; out-of-pocket payers Value Finance 30
  • 31. Management Structure 31 Board of Directors Management Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Scientific Officer Chief Medical Officer General Counsel Corporate Development Engineering
  • 32. Funding Source – Product Development Impact Investment & Accelerator Programs The Alvin and Fanny B. Thalheimer Foundation McArthur Foundation Abell Foundation 32
  • 33. Milestones: Start Up Considerations Legal Incorporation Tax and Administrative Formation of Board Formation of Managing Team Strategic and Marketing Planning Agreements with Manufacturers Distribution Arrangements 33
  • 34. Commercialization Timeline 34 FDA PMA Filing Stakeholder Outreach Clinical Trials Mass Production Hire Management TeamEstablish Board of DirectorsLicensing and Funding Incorporation 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Prototype Now Patent Expiry
  • 35. Start-Up Projected Revenue Incorporation Fixed Setup Cost: $200 FDA Fixed Regulatory Costs: $2,600 Admin & Marketing Annual Cost: $500,000 Operating Cost Reimbursement Cost: $150 Manufacturing Cost: $48 NIH royalty: $15 Profit: $87 Prevalence 1.89 M patients/year Positive Cash Flow 164 M 35 5 Year Revenue Forecast
  • 37. US Market Size • PCR Molecular Diagnostics Total Global Market • $5.2 Billion • Sepsis cost US hospitals $20 Billion in 2011 37 Total Revenue Opportunity = $900 M Reimbursable Revenue Opportunity = $285 M Reimbursable Price: $150 Total Diagnostic Price: $500 Prevalence Primary 1.36 M + Secondary .54 M = 1.89 M
  • 38. Global Market Size Overview 38 Oncology 21% Identity/paternity 28% Pre/postnatal screening 6% Infectious disease 45% GLOBAL PCR MARKET SHARE FOR MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS BY PCR (%) 0.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 20,000.00 25,000.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020 Global Market for Molecular Diagnostics by Technology ($ Million) PCR Microarrays In Situ Hybridization Biochip Other PCR Application 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020 CAGR% 2015- 2020 Infectious Disease 3,227.4 3,783.6 4,435.6 5,200.0 9,900.0 13.7
  • 39. Appendix: Market Segmentation 39 Product Segment: Molecular diagnostics and pathology DNA analysis for: Infectious diseases, oncology, pre/post natal screening, etc. Industry Segment: Hospitals and laboratories Patients, clinical care providers, and basic scientists Considerations when Identifying Segments → measureable, large, and stable Udemy Content Library, accessed on April 13, 2016, at blog.udemy.com/types-of-market-segmentation
  • 40. Appendix: Target Segment 40 Molecular Diagnostic • Specific product to detect and identify fungal infections • Clearly defined group of end-users • Applicable to numerous pathology segments • Clinical, general, and anatomic IBIS World, accessed on April 13, 2016, at www.ibisworld.com/reports/us/industry/ataglance
  • 41. Appendix: Buyers- End Users 41 Fungus Diagnostic Reagents/Biotech companies Hospital Labs Patients Reagent/Biotech Companies Hospital Labs Patients - Large Biotech and Reagents Companies interested in licencing or that want to deveop product segments (low risk, low cost ) Eg: Biogen, Agilent Technologies. - Hospital Labs with limited budget - Hospital Labs in the developing countries (India, Africa, South East Asia) - International NGOs that offer healthcare services to underserved populations (eg: MSF, Project Hope, Partners in Health) - Immunocompromised patients - Pre/post natal - Long stay at the hospitals
  • 42. Appendix: Global Market 42 Technology 2012 2013 2014 2015 2020 CAGR% 2015-2020 PCR 7,794.3 8,861.7 10,082.6 11,480.0 19,450.0 11.1 Microarrays 3,712.2 4,310.7 5,007.8 5,820.0 10,330.0 12.2 In Situ Hybridization 2,801.2 3,313.3 3,923.1 4,650.0 8,600.0 13.1 Biochip 1,697.6 2,053.1 2,485.0 3,010.0 6,470.0 16.5 Other 103.5 129.0 160.6 200.0 400.0 14.9 Total 16,108.8 18,667.8 21,659.1 25,160.0 45,250.0 12.5 GLOBAL MARKET FOR MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS BY TECHNOLOGY ($ MILLIONS)
  • 43. Appendix: Price • Prevalence of Sepsis in US 2015 • Primary = 1.36 Million • Secondary = 0.54 Million • Total Diagnostic Price $500 • $50 per species • 10 total species under patent • Reimbursable Price $150 • $50 per species • only 3 species reimbursable 43

Notas do Editor

  1. Introduce at MFs
  2. Leave out wordiness
  3. Summary slide of key findings for 9 market forces and stakeholder analysis? Only show best interest stakeholders and those not interested Add only most important market forces
  4. Summarize this better
  5. Delayed Tiered Upfront Execution Royalty: due to the NIH upon a liquidity event such as an IPO, a merger, a sublicense, an assignment, acquisition by another firm, or first commercial sale
  6. References: https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Education/pages/factsheet_sepsis.aspx http://www.world-sepsis-day.org/CONTENTPIC/2015_WSD_FactSheet_long_English.pdf http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/molecular-diagnostics-technologies-global-markets-report-bio063c.html Molecular Diagnostics: Technologies and Global Markets Code - BIO063C, Published - June 2015, Analyst - Jon Evans, Category - Biotechnology
  7. Synthesize this slide with NIH considerations + advise non-renewal Change this Go/No go to only have “Recommendations Moving Forward” Bring 4 copies of the slide deck – print on yellow paper : email Toby final slide deck
  8. References: https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Education/pages/factsheet_sepsis.aspx http://www.world-sepsis-day.org/CONTENTPIC/2015_WSD_FactSheet_long_English.pdf http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/molecular-diagnostics-technologies-global-markets-report-bio063c.html Molecular Diagnostics: Technologies and Global Markets Code - BIO063C, Published - June 2015, Analyst - Jon Evans, Category - Biotechnology
  9. Diagnostics can be segmented into products, and/or industry.
  10. We are target the molecular diagnostics product segment- our product is very specific which makes it easier to compare and stand out amongst competition. The more specific, the better, because we can target specific end-users and customers.
  11. The probe is first sold to reagent/biotech companies that will licence the technology (low risk, less costly process than invention a new device from scratch). Then, they will resell it to hospital labs. Hospitals with limited budget or international medical humanitarian organizations are potential buyers. The end users are patients who are prone to hospital acquired fungus infection.