2. And what about worldwide – ‘top’
universities drawn on a population base
3. ‘top’ universities spread over a world
where area is proportional to GDP
Drawn by Ben Hennig: Unequal Elite: The THE World University Rankings
4. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-24866265
But we also live in a physical world, not just a world of GDP,
universities, life chances and prizes. And that physical world
is changing too. Typhoons are becoming stronger and more
frequent.
Super Typhoon Haiyan:
5.
6.
7. The lights are turning on all the way up the
Nile, as people crowd into less and less space
…To finish with let’s
look at what happens
when you take a
composite of many
satellite images like
this and draw them
over the map of the
planet, but with that
map stretched to give
everyone equal space
so we can see who is
wasting light and who
is not (or has none)?
http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/
media-live/photos/000/620/overrides/new-
view-earth-at-night-nile_62008_600x450.jpg
8. Cartography by
Ben Hennig
At the end of 2012 NASA updated its image of the sky at night. Cairo/Alexandria
appeared to shine brighter than Tokyo. This map will grow, it needs to become duller.
A few years earlier the world map looked like this…
9. An image of the world at night taken a few years ago, before the Tsunami hit Japan.
Try to spot the four tiny spots of light in NZ and compare them to London…
Try to see the world as being made up of people. The vast majority of the planet
shrinks away as most land is unoccupied and the wildernesses are vast. Rural
populations are already falling and set to fall further. The map of human beings is
becoming a map of a sea of cities, and a few people in a few cities consume most.
11. And then you might find you are on
the edge of the world again
7 billion people rising to 10 billion in your lifetime
12. I don’t think
we’ll get to 10
billion.
But I don’t
think that is
what matters
most.
The planet
cannot
support 1
billion people
behaving
badly
?
13. Global Inequality
24 of the richest countries of the world (by GDP per capita) which are home to at least two million people,
they are home to 13% of the world’s population, and almost 50% of world income (GDP)
15. Global Wealth
The world resized according to each country’s gross domestic product
Source: modified and updated map from www.worldmapper .org
Japan
Germany
France
Spain
UK
USA
16. Inequality in the rich world
best-off/worse-off 10%
income ratio from UNDP
17.7 Singapore
15.9 United States
15.0 Portugal
13∙8 United Kingdom
13.4 Israel
12.5 Australia
12.5 New Zealand
11.6 Italy
10.3 Spain
10.2 Greece
9.4 Canada
9.4 Ireland
9.2 Netherlands
9.1 France
9.0 Switzerland
8.2 Belgium
8.1 Denmark
7.3 Slovenia
6.9 Austria
6.9 Germany
6.2 Sweden
6.1 Norway
5.6 Finland
4.5 Japan
Japan
4∙5
Germany
6∙9
France
9∙1
Spain
10∙3
UK
13∙8
USA
15∙9
17. What could be the effects of the
effects… of economic inequality
We are going to look at
Meat consumption
Water consumption
Waste production
Number of Flights
Ecological impact
in each of the most affluent countries.
You might think: "Surely, if a few people hold most of the wealth we all consume less?"
18. Inequality and meat
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Meatconsumptioninkgperyearperperson
Inequality
Not if you are concerned about how much meat we farm and consume
Japan
Germany
France
Spain
UK
USA
19. Inequality and water
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
waterinm3peryearperperson
Inequality
Not if you are concerned about how much water we use (apart from the UK!)
Japan
Germany
France
Spain
UK
USA
20. 300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Inequality and waste
Not if you are concerned about how much waste we each produce
Japan
Germany France
Spain
UK
USA
Inequality
Singapore
1100
Municipalwastecollected(kgpercapitaperyear)
21. Inequality and flights
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
60
Norway
Ireland
New Zealand
annualaircraftdeparturesperthousandpeople
Inequality
Not if you are concerned about how many flights we each take (on average)
Japan
Germany
France
Spain
UK
USA
Italy
Canada
22. Inequality and ecology
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Inequality
Ecologicalfootprintinglobalhectarespercapita
Japan
Germany
France
Spain
UK
USA
Singapore
Not if you are concerned about how many planets we might need to exist:
An Ecological Footprint of 2.1 global hectares per capita equals one-planet living
23. Data sources
UNDP/FAO http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=126
UNDP/LPR http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=104
UNSD http://unstats.un.org/unsd/ENVIRONMENT/qindicators.htm
World Bank World Development Indicators 2005 (IS.AIR.DPRT)
WWF Living Planet Index 2008
More and more geographical data is becoming available, often for the first time.