3. Index
9/18/2014 3
1. Project Type & Location
2. Client & Project Details
3. Project Process : Challenges & Execution
4. Project Process : Duration, Inputs, Output
5. Quality Process
6. Project Outputs
4. 9/18/2014 4
Project : Development of Boiler supporting structure for Cement Industry
Location : UAE
Project Type & Location
5. 9/18/2014 5
Client Profile
• Client Company is a leading cement manufacturer’s in emerging markets.
• It is based in Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates and employs more than 500 people.
• It is the largest cement producer in the United Arab Emirates and a leading regional cement exporter.
• Their principal operating cement plant has an annual production capacity of 2.7 million tons cement
and 3.8 million tons clinker.
Project Detail
• The project was to build up a supporting structure for new boiler in cement industry.
• Hi-Tech’s scope of work was to provide shop drawings for boiler supporting structure.
Client & Project Details
6. 9/18/2014 6
Project Process
Challenges
• Their structure design firm of the boiler supporting structure provided Staad pro model as an initial input
for starting the TEKLA model. Further the task was to import the Staad model into TEKLA & work on it.
• The analysis model in Staad is always a center line model, so we need to change all members location
as per the actual input drawings.
• Steel connections were too heavy for TEKLA modeling.
Execution
• After incorporating Staad model provided by their design firm we have to change each member’s
location.
• Even design firm was to design the same structure simultaneously which we were doing in TEKLA. So
there were chances of more revisions from the design team. So to deal with it and to make it finish it in
specific time line was one of the big task.
• Tower height was 55 metre and there was a lump mass at the top of structure in the form of boiler. Such
situation makes stability of structure very instable under earthquake forces and to resist such forces
designer provided us very heavy beam-beam, beam-column, bracing connections. So to do TEKLA
model of such heavy connections was a good experience.
• The detailed shop drawings helped the client to reduce the overall installation time which further
reduced project cost & thus made the execution process smoother.
7. 9/18/2014 7
Project Duration
• The project lasted for a period of about 5 months.
Inputs Received
• The Staad working model, Structure drawings & connection sketches from structure engineer.
Outputs Delivered
• General Arrangement drawings
• Assembly drawings
• Part drawings
Software Used
• TEKLA
Project Process
8. 9/18/2014 8
Quality Process
Organization Quality
Standards, Quality
Documents & earlier
project reference
Quality Planning for
each project
Prepare
List of Quality
Parameters
Prepare
Responsibility
Matrix [RACI
Chart]
Prepare
Quality
Register
Prepare a
Preliminary Quality
List
1st Level – Self QC
2nd Level – Peer QC
3rd Level – Random Audit by Quality Manager
Update Quality register & if necessary update Quality List/ Quality Parameter
List
If any changes recommended by client
a. Part of SoW (Scope of Work): Iteration in above process
b. Any new changes included in SOW: Start
Engineering Change Management Process
Prepare a Final
Quality List
Project In
Quotation
Sample
Project
Customer
Feedback
Actual Project
Execution
Quality Check
Customer
Feedback
Final Delivery
14. 9/18/2014 14
T H A N K Y O U
L O C A T I O N S :
Hi-Tech House
Nr. Gurukul Tower,
Gurukul,
A h m e d a b a d,
Gujarat, India.
5th Floor, Commerce House – IV,
100 Ft. Road,
Prahladnagar,
A h m e d a b a d,
Gujarat, India.
43-A, E Block, 3rd Floor,
Cochin Special Economic Zone
Kakkanad,
Kochi,
Kerala, India.
Bhushan Avsatthi
Associate Director
Architecture Engineering Construction