5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
A Holistic Approach Towards International Disaster Resilient Architecture by ...
PEP_Davos_26-8-2014_Tuesday-Vos
1. Crisis Management –
Risk Communication and
Technologies for Public Resilience
Special Panel
26.8.2014 – 15:15
2. Policymaking
Research
Practice
Public Empowerment Policies
and research to enhance
crisis response abilities of the public
Prof. Marita Vos
University of Jyväskylä Finland
3. Empowerment > Resilience
• Empowerment: a process of developing
abilities to gain control on what’s important in
life, to mitigate the consequences of a disaster
• Resilience: being able to self-organize and
mobilise resources, adapt in the face of a
disturbance
• On the individual/ community/ societal level.
www.projectPEP.eu 3
4. Public Empowerment Policies
• Aim at enhancing resilience on various levels
• by structurally facilitating public
preparedness
• in a community approach to connect with
citizen networks and initiatives
• throughout all the phases of a crisis
www.projectPEP.eu 4
5. Whole community approach
• Using all available resources and social capital
• Acknowledging the importance of all that form
the network, rather than only counting on
formal specialised teams for fixed scenarios
• Collaboration
• Supported by technology
– not just to gather data and instruct
www.projectPEP.eu 5
6. Elements of the Roadmap
Public Empowerment Policies for crisis management
Policymaking
Research
Practice
www.projectPEP.eu 6
(1)
(2)
(3)
8. Discussion points (1)
• Technology created opportunities for
communication but also expectations.
• In the future, diverse open and closed crisis
mapping systems will co-exist.
• Integral approach, part of daily life;
avoid increasing feelings of unsafety.
www.projectPEP.eu 8
Policymaking
Research
Practice
10. Discussion points (2)
• Different levels of attention, often low
• How can community approaches be
emphasized in the Post 2015 Framework for
Disaster Risk Reduction?
Clear lead helps, e.g. UNISDR campaign ‘Making
cities resilient’
+ diverse initiatives, e.g. per sector, locally
www.projectPEP.eu 10
Policymaking
Research
Practice
12. Discussion points (3)
• Future research can clarify self-organization
of citizens, so that response organizations can
better connect with this.
• Look into modes of collaboration between
citizen groups and response organisations in
recent crises, and critically show barriers.
www.projectPEP.eu 12
Policymaking
Research
Practice
14. Funded by the European Community’s 7th Framework Program - number 284927
www.projectPEP.eu 14
Notas do Editor
Sadan – Palenchar&Heath
Heath etal - Norris etal
Bounce back
Multi-directional flows
New possibilities create new expectations
Digital voluntarism
Data gathering
Human sensors with smart phones, geo-location, cameras
Direct information
Inclusiveness
Monitoring
Open systems need filtering for privacy protection (and prevention of misuse) – citizen messages on map
Civil society actors & authority systems
In weather app – in route planner (next to direct alerts and notification)
ICT needs to fit strategic policies (is more info better?)
Feel safe if you see all trouble? Does it get a follow-up?
Sending sending
Diverse levels of development and inventing the same wheel?