3. 3
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit third-party benchmark data or the web sites referenced in this document. You should visit the referenced web site and confirm whether referenced data are accurate. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 1. Twenty-seven performance world records based on two-socket configurations. Source as of September 8, 2014. Full details available at: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/benchmarks/server/xeon-e5-2600-v3/xeon-e5-2600-v3-summary.html 2. Comparison based on SPECpower_ssj2008 results published as of Sept 8 2014. New configuration: Sugon I620-G20 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 8x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2, IBM J9 VM, 10,599 overall ssj_ops/watt. Source, results submitted as of Sept 8 2014. 3. Source as of September 8, 2014. New configuration: Hewlett-Packard Company HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java Standard Edition 8 update 11, 190,674 SPECjbb2013- MultiJVM max-jOPS, 47,139 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Source. Baseline: Cisco Systems Cisco UCS C240 M3 platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2, Oracle Java Standard Edition 7 update 45, 63,079 SPECjbb2013- MultiJVM max-jOPS , 23,797 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Source. 4. Comparisons based by Intel on publicly available specification sheet data &/or white papers
Delivering Leadership Performance 27 New World Records1!
Including World’s Most Energy Efficient Server2
Up to 3x performance improvement for efficient, high performance building blocks3
Up to 6x throughput with latest SSD4
Up to 40GbE to improve network virtualization
PUBLIC
4. Key Differences Between E5-2600 v2 & E5-2600 v3
Xeon E5-2600 v2
“Ivy Bridge-EP”
Xeon E5-2600 v3
“Haswell-EP”
Core Count
Up to 12 Cores
Up to 18 Cores
Frequency
TDP & Turbo Frequencies
TDP & Turbo Freq
AVX & AVX Turbo Freq
AVX Support
Intel® AVX
8 DP Flops/Clock
Intel® AVX 2
16 DP Flops/Clock
Memory Type
4xDDR3 channels
RDIMM, UDIMM, LRDIMM
4xDDR4 channels
RDIMM, LRDIMM
Memory Frequency
(MHz)
1866 (1DPC), 1600, 1333, 1033
RDIMM: 2133 (1DPC), 1866 (2DPC), 1600
LRDIMM: 2133 (1&2DPC), 1600
QPI Speed
Up to 8.0 GT/s
Up to 9.6 GT/s
TDP
Up to 130W Server, 150W Workstation
Up to 145W Server, 160W Workstation
Increase due to Integrated Voltage Regulator
Power
Management
Same P-states for all cores
Same core & uncore frequency
Per-core P-states
Independent uncore frequency scaling
Energy Efficient Turbo
4
PUBLIC
6. 1.20
1.24
1.28
1.30
1.41
1.42
1.44
1.60
1.60
1.67
1.70
1.91
1.97
2.45
3.02
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
E5-2697 v2
Baseline
SPECmpiM*_
base2007
SPECpower*_
ssj2008+
TPC*-H
SPECfp*_rate_
base2006
SPECint*_rate_
base2006
SPECompG*_
base2012++
STREAM
(Triad)
VMmark* 2.5
SAP SD*
2-Tier
mweb
SPECvirt*_
sc2013
Linpack
memcached*
SPECjbb2013*
MultiJVM
critical-jOPs
SPECjbb2013*
MultiJVM
max-jOPs
Relative Performance
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) vs. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 (12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Generational Performance Summary
+Baseline is E5-2660 v2 (10C, 2.2GHz, 95W) ++New configuration is E5-2690 v3 (12C, 2.6GHz, 135W) Source as of Sept 8 2014, see next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others
6
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3
PUBLIC
7. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family 4-Year Refresh Performance Summary
7
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.4
6.3
8.7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
X5690
2011 Launch
SPECpower*_
ssj2008+
STREAM
(Triad)
SPECint*_rate_
base2006
SAP SD*
2-Tier
VMmark* 2.x
SPECfp*_rate_
base2006
Linpack
SPECjbb2013*
MultiJVM
max-jOPs
Preliminary Relative Performance
Intel® Xeon® E5-2699 v3 (18C, 2.3GHz, 145W) vs. X5690 (6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3 – 2014 Launch
PUBLIC
+Baseline is X5675 (6C, 3.06GHz, 95W) Source as of Sept 8 2014, see next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others
8. 0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2006
Xeon 5160
(2C,
3GHz, 80W)
2007
X5272
(2C, 3.4GHz,
80W)
2007
X5365
(4C,
3GHz, 150W)
2008
X5492
(4C, 3.4GHz,
150W)
2009
X5570
(4C, 2.93GHz,
95W)
2010
X5680
(6C, 3.33GHz,
130W)
2012
E5-2690
(8C, 2.9GHz,
135W)
2013
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz,
130W)
2014
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz,
145W)
SPECint*_rate_base2006 performance
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v2 Product Family Historical 2S Integer Throughput Performance
8
PUBLIC
Up to 22x increase in integer throughput on Intel® Xeon® since 2006
Higher is better
Up to 22X
Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others
9. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v2 Product Family Historical 2S Energy Efficient Performance
9
Up to 27x
Higher is better
Up to 27x increase in energy efficiency on Intel® Xeon® since 2006
Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2006
Xeon 5160
(2C,
3GHz, 80W)
2007
X5272
(2C, 3.4GHz,
80W)
2007
L5335
(4C,
2GHz, 50W)
2008
L5430
(4C, 2.66GHz,
50W)
2009
X5570
(4C, 2.93GHz,
95W)
2010
X5675
(6C, 3.06GHz,
95W)
2012
E5-2660
(8C, 2.2GHz,
95W)
2013
E5-2660 v2
(10C, 2.2GHz,
95W)
2014
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz,
145W)
SPECpower*_ssj2008 (Overall ssj_ops/watt)
PUBLIC
10. Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Die Configurations
HCC consists of 4 columns and 2 Memory Controllers.
MCC consists of 3 columns 4 (core + LLC slices) and 2 Memory Controllers.
LCC consists of 2 columns 4 (core + LLC slices) and single Memory Controller.
Not representative of actual die-sizes, orientation and layouts – for informational use only.
14-18 Core (HCC)
4-8 Core (LCC)
10-12 Core (MCC)
10
PUBLIC
11. Cluster on Die (COD) Mode
11
Cluster0
Cbo LLC
Cbo
LLC
Sbo
Sbo
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
HA0
QPI 0/1
IIO
HA1
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Cluster1
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Cbo
LLC
Core
Core
Core
Core
Cbo
LLC
COD Mode for 18C HSW-EP
Supported on 2S HSW-EP SKUs with 2 Home Agents (10+ cores)
Targeted at NUMA workloads where latency is more important than sharing data across Caching Agents (Cbo)
Reduces average LLC hit and local memory latencies
HA mostly sees requests from reduced set of threads which can lead to higher memory bandwidth
OS/VMM own NUMA and process affinity decisions
PUBLIC
13. Refresh Performance
1.41
3.2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
Q3'13 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
X5690
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
Q1'11 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
13
Enterprise Benchmark Performance General Computing – SPECint*rate_base2006
Source as of Sept 8 2014. Baseline: Supermicro SuperServer 6027AX-TRF platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2697 v2, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 981. Source. New configuration: Supermicro SuperServer 6028UX-TR4 with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 16x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, RHEL 6.5, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 1,390. Source, results submitted as of Sept. 8 2014. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
•More cores & larger cache
•DDR4 memory
•Intel® AVX2
•Cluster on Die snoop mode
PUBLIC
14. Refresh Performance
1.41
3.2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
Q3'13 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
X5690
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
Q1'11 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
14
Enterprise Benchmark Performance General Computing – SPECint*rate_base2006
Source as of Sept 8 2014 on SPECint*rate_base2006. Baseline Configuration: 2-socket Intel® Xeon® processor X5690 platform, 48GB memory, RHEL 6.2. Compiler version: Intel Compiler 12.1.0. Source. Score: 425. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
PUBLIC
15. Refresh Performance
1.30
3.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
X5680
(6C, 3.33GHz, 130W)
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
15
Technical Computing Benchmark Performance Floating Point Throughput – SPECfp*rate_base2006
Source as of Sept 8 2014. New configuration: Supermicro SuperServer 6028UX-TR4 with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 16x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, RHEL 6.5, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECfp_rate_base2006 score: 935. Source, results submitted as of Sept. 8 2014. Baseline: Supermicro SuperServer 6027AX-TRF platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2697 v2, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECfp_rate_base2006 score: 714. Source. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
•More Cores & Larger Cache
•DDR4 Memory
•Intel® AVX2
•Cluster on Die Snoop Mode
PUBLIC
16. Refresh Performance
1.30
3.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
X5690
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
16
Technical Computing Benchmark Performance Floating Point Throughput – SPECfp*rate_base2006
Source as of Sept 8 2014 on SPECfp*rate_base2006. Baseline Configuration: 2-socket Intel® Xeon® processor X5690 platform, 48 GB memory, SLES11* SP1, Intel Compiler 12.1.0. Source. Score: 271. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
PUBLIC
17. Advanced
Standard
Basic
Segmented Optimized
Low
Power
12C 120W 2.3 GHz
10C 105W 2.3 GHz
12C 120W 2.5 GHz
8C 85W 2.4 GHz
12C 65W 1.8 GHz
8C 55W 1.8 GHz
6C 85W 1.6 GHz
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Internal SPECCPU*rate_base2006 Performance Estimates
12C 135W 2.6 GHz
10C 105W 2.6 GHz
14C 120W 2.3 GHz
14C 145W 2.6 GHz
14C 120W 2.0 GHz
E5-2603 v3
E5-2670 v3
E5-2690 v3
E5-2680 v3
E5-2650 v3
E5-2660 v3
8C 90W 2.6 GHz
6C 85W 2.4 GHz
8C (20M) 135W 3.2 GHz
6C (20M) 135W 3.4 GHz
4C (15M) 135W
3.5GHz
6C 85W 1.9 GHz
E5-2609 v3
E5-2620 v3
E5-2640 v3
E5-2630 v3
E5-2697 v3
E5-2695 v3
E5-2683 v3
E5-2637 v3
E5-2667 v3
E5-2643 v3
E5-2630L v3
E5-2650L v3
4C (10M) 105W
3.0GHz
E5-2623 v3
18C 145W 2.3 GHz
16C 135W 2.3 GHz
E5-2699 v3
E5-2698 v3
Source as of July 2014: Platform with two E5 v3, Prefetchers, HT & Turbo Enabled, NUMA & COD (LCC-ES) mode, 8x16GB DDR4-2133, RHEL 6.4, IC14.0-AVX2, BIOS 27.R01. SIR for E5-2699 v3 used 8x32GB LR-DIMM DDR4-2133. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Frequency
Optimized
1060
771
1000
747
960
740
873
686
817
668
695
567
661
534
502
437
305
317
726
577
514
445
1290
870
1190
835
1190
831
1080
782
1050
781
797
632
SPECint*_rate
_base2006
estimates
SPECfp*_rate
_base2006
estimates
266
290
661
557
454
412
414
380
PUBLIC
NEW/UPDATED
18. HSW
IVB
Up to 42%, 32%
Up to 31%, 27%
Up to 30%, 26%
Up to 21%, 22%
Up to 35%, 28%
Up to 17%, 14%
Up to 24%, 22%
SPECCPU*base2006 Relative Performance
18
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
1.00
0.95
0.66
0.44
0.58
0.48
1.00
0.97
0.77
0.57
0.68
0.59
0.56
0.39
1.00
0.92
0.92
0.84
0.81
1.00
0.95
0.95
0.89
0.89
0.66
0.51
12C 130W 2.7GHz
E5-2697 v2
12C 115W 2.4GHz
E5-2695 v2
14C 120W 2.3 GHz
14C 145W 2.6 GHz
14C 120W 2.0 GHz
E5-2697 v3
E5-2695 v3
E5-2683 v3
18C 145W 2.3 GHz
16C 135W 2.3 GHz
E5-2699 v3
E5-2698 v3
6C 135W 3.4 GHz
4C 135W 3.5GHz
E5-2637 v3
E5-2643 v3
4C 105W
3.0GHz
E5-2623 v3
8C 135W 3.2 GHz
E5-2667 v3
4C 130W
3.5GHz
E5-2637 v2
8C 130W
3.3GHz
E5-2667 v2
6C 130W
3.5GHz
E5-2643 v2
6C 60W
2.4GHz
E5-2630L v2
10C 70W
1.7GHz
E5-2650L v2
12C 65W 1.8 GHz
8C 55W 1.8 GHz
E5-2630Lv3
E5-2650L v3
0.89
IVB-to-HSW %gains on SIR, SFR
SPECint*_rate
_base2006
Relative Performance
SPECfp*_rate _base2006 Relative Performance
0.83
Up to 4%, 8%
0.61
0.72
Up to 9%, 10%
0.51
0.64
Up to 12%, 11%
0.35
0.47
Up to 2%, 2%
0.32
0.43
PUBLIC
IVB SIR relative to
E5-2697 v2
IVB SFR relative to E5-2697 v2
HSW SIR relative to
E5-2699 v3
HSW SFR relative to
E5-2699 v3
19. HSW
IVB
SPECint*_rate
_base2006
Relative Performance
Up to 25%, 24%
Up to 23%, 23%
Up to 24%, 26%
Up to 26%, 26%
Up to 35%, 27%
Up to 39%, 29%
Up to 23%, 18%
Up to 24%, 23%
SPECfp*_rate
_base2006
Relative Performance
19
0.92
0.89
0.84
0.77
0.70
0.56
0.52
0.44
0.26
0.19
4C 80W 2.5GHz
E5-2609 v2
4C 80W
1.8GHz
E5-2603 v2
10C 115W
2.5GHz
E5-2670 v2
10C 130W
3.0GHz
E5-2690 v2
10C 115W 2.8GHz
E5-2680 v2
8C 95W
2.6GHz
E5-2650 v2
10C 95W
2.2GHz
E5-2660 v2
6C 80W
2.1GHz
E5-2620 v2
8C 95W 2.0GHz
E5-2640 v2
6C 80W
2.6GHz
E5-2630 v2
0.94
0.92
0.89
0.84
0.80
0.67
0.63
0.56
0.38
0.30
12C 120W 2.3 GHz
10C 105W 2.3 GHz
12C 120W 2.5 GHz
8C 85W 2.4 GHz
6C 85W 1.6 GHz
12C 135W 2.6 GHz
10C 105W 2.6 GHz
E5-2603 v3
E5-2670 v3
E5-2690 v3
E5-2680 v3
E5-2650 v3
E5-2660 v3
8C 90W 2.6 GHz
6C 85W 2.4 GHz
6C 85W 1.9 GHz
E5-2609 v3
E5-2620 v3
E5-2640 v3
E5-2630 v3
0.82
0.78
0.74
0.67
0.63
0.53
0.51
0.38
0.88
0.85
0.85
0.78
0.76
0.65
0.61
0.50
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Up to 28%, 25%
0.23
0.36
Up to 50%, 45%
0.20
0.33
SPECCPU*base2006 Relative Performance
IVB-to-HSW %gains on SIR, SFR
IVB SIR relative to
E5-2697 v2
IVB SFR relative to
E5-2697 v2
HSW SIR relative to
E5-2699 v3
HSW SFR relative to
E5-2699 v3
PUBLIC
20. Refresh Performance
1.24
3.1
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
E5-2660 v2
(10C, 2.6GHz, 95W)
Q3'13 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
X5675
(6C, 3.06GHz, 95W)
Q1'11 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
20
Enterprise Benchmark Performance Energy Efficiency – SPECPower*_ssj2008
PUBLIC
Source as of Sept 8 2014. Sugon I620-G20 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 8x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2, IBM J9 VM, 10,599 overall ssj_ops/watt. Source, results submitted as of Sept. 8 2014. Dell Inc. PowerEdge T620 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2660 v2, IBM J9 VM, 8,533 overall ssj_ops/watt. Source. HP ProLiant DL360 G7* with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5675, Source, Score: 3,329 overall ssj_ops/watt. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
21. Refresh Performance
1.60
3.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
Q3'13 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
X5690
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
Q1'11 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
21
Enterprise Benchmark Performance Virtualization – VMmark 2.x
Source as of Sept 8 2014. New Configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1 platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, VMware ESXi 5.5.0 U2, VMmark v2.5.2 score: 26.48 @ 22 tiles. Source. Baseline: HP ProLiant DL380p Gen8 platform with two Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2, VMWare ESXi 5.1.0 U1, VMmark v2.5.1 score: 16.54 @ 14 tiles. Source .Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
•Higher CPU utilization
•DDR4 Memory
•Faster QPI Speed
PUBLIC
22. Refresh Performance
1.60
3.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
Q3'13 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
X5690
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
Q1'11 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
22
Enterprise Benchmark Performance Virtualization – VMmark2.x
Source as of Sept 8, 2014. Baseline: Fujitsu PRIMENERGY RX300 S6 with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5690, VMware ESXi 4.1 U1, VMmark* v2.1.1 score: 7.59 @ 7 tiles, source. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
PUBLIC
23. Refresh Performance
1.60
3.30
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
Q3'13 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
X5680
(6C, 3.33GHz, 130W)
Q1'11 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
23
Enterprise Resource Planning Performance SAP Sales & Distribution* (2 Tier) on Linux
Source as of Sept 8 2014. results submitted or published to www.sap.com/benchmark, details on next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
•Cluster on Die snoop mode
•More cores & larger cache
PUBLIC
24. Refresh Performance
1.60
3.30
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
Q3'13 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
X5680
(6C, 3.33GHz, 130W)
Q1'11 Launch
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
Q3'14 Launch
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
24
Enterprise Resource Planning Performance SAP Sales & Distribution* (2 Tier) on Linux
Source as of Sept 8 2014. results submitted or published to www.sap.com/benchmark, details on next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
PUBLIC
25. Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org, details on the next slide. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Java Performance & Benefits of JDK8
1.45
2.62
3.58
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM
max-jOPs
Preliminary Relative Performance
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
JDK7u11
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
JDK7u11 + 2x memory
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
JDK8u5 + 2x memory
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
JDK8u11 + 2x memory + optimizations
25
PUBLIC
Up to 80% gain from JDK8
26. 8.7
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Relative Performance
Refresh Performance
X5690
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
JDK7u11
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
JDK8u11
3.02
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
JDK7u45
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
JDK8u11
26
Java Performance SPECjbb*2013-MultiJVM max-jOPs
Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
PUBLIC
27. 16.3
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Relative Performance
Refresh Performance
X5690
(6C, 3.46GHz, 130W)
JDK7u11
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
JDK8u20
2.45
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Relative Performance
Generational Performance
E5-2697 v2
(12C, 2.7GHz, 130W)
JDK7u40
E5-2699 v3
(18C, 2.3GHz, 145W)
JKD8u20
27
Java Performance SPECjbb*2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPs
Source as of Sept 8 2014: results published or submitted to www.spec.org. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
PUBLIC