3. 3
New Case Law
District Missteps
Assessment
Litigious Parent
Staff Venting
Reimbursement
High School Transition
Plans
Eligibility
4. 4
District Misstep: Assessment
Ravenswood v. JS
(N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
Facts
Student struggled upon entering kindergarten,
repeated 1st
grade
Parent requested assessment in March 21, 2007
District told parent no assessment until results of
medical vision and hearing tests received
5. 5
District Misstep: Assessment
Facts
Assessment plan provided to parent in
December 2007
Academic assessment in March 2008
No psychological assessment until May 29,
2008 (due to lack of school psychologists)
Initial IEP held September 2008
(18 months after referral)
Ravenswood v. JS (N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
6. 6
District Misstep: Assessment
Facts
Annual IEP held in September 2009
Due to lack of progress, team discussed other
placement options
No clear placement offer made, no offer to
reconvene
District offered to assess academics, but no
assessment plan developed
Ravenswood v. JS (N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
7. 7
District Misstep: Assessment
Facts
District held IEP in February 2010 to discuss
results of assessments
Student required intensive reading intervention
District offered general education classroom
using the Inside Program
Parent did not consent
Ravenswood v. JS (N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
8. 8
District Misstep: Assessment
Facts
Parent filed a due process complaint
Requested three years of prospective placement
at Stellar Academy (including transportation) as
compensatory education
Ravenswood v. JS (N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
9. 9
District Misstep: Assessment
District’s arguments
Claim was barred by two-year statute of
limitations
Finding
District knew its statement regarding medical
assessment was erroneous, misrepresented
process
Statute of limitations extended
Ravenswood v. JS (N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
10. 10
District Misstep: Assessment
District’s arguments
Lack of baselines not a denial of FAPE because
they are not mandatory components of IEP
Observational and other data was enough
Finding
IEP begins with PLOP
Baseline data must be clear to measure
progress
Goals were inadequate, denied FAPERavenswood v. JS (N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
11. 11
District Misstep: Assessment
District’s arguments
Lack of progress result of mother’s failure to
address Student’s undiagnosed ADD
Finding
Mother’s refusal to have Student tested for ADD
does not relieve District from duty to assess,
develop adequate IEP, and provide FAPE
Ravenswood v. JS (N.D.Cal., March 30, 2012)
12. 12
District Misstep: Litigious Parent
Anchorage School District v. M. P.
(9th Cir., July 19, 2012. No. 10-36065)
Facts
Student diagnosed with high functioning autism, PDD,
and sensory integration dysfunction
Parent consented to IEP in August 2006 (2nd
grade)
Parent filed due process complaint in April 2007
Parent awarded 15 hours compensatory instruction
Parent wanted more and appealed
Both superior court and Alaska Supreme Court affirmed hearing
officer decision
13. 13
District Misstep: Litigious Parent
Facts
In the meantime, 2006 IEP expired
February 2008, District held IEP meeting to
update expired IEP (3rd
grade)
Parent did not attend but provided extensive
written comments
District decided to postpone further meetings
until appeals were decided
Anchorage School District v. M. P. (9th Cir., July 19, 2012)
14. 14
District Misstep: Litigious Parent
Facts
Parent enrolled Student in another
school where he repeated 3rd
grade
School implemented 2006 IEP
In August and September 2008, Parent filed four
due process complaints related to FAPE during
2008 calendar year
Anchorage School District v. M. P. (9th Cir., July 19, 2012)
15. 15
District Misstep: Litigious Parent
Hearing officer found for parent
District appealed decision
District court found in favor of District
Parent appealed to 9th
Circuit
Anchorage School District v. M. P. (9th Cir., July 19, 2012)
16. 16
District Misstep: Litigious Parent
9th
Circuit found
District denied FAPE
District had affirmative duty to update IEP
Duty not contingent on parental cooperation
If parents did not agree, District should have
Continued working with parents, or
Filed for hearing
Anchorage School District v. M. P. (9th Cir., July 19, 2012)
17. 17
District Misstep: Staff Venting
Oxford, PA Area High School
Facts
School principal was observed sending obscene
and insulting text messages during IEP meeting
Called bipolar student a "manipulator," psychopath,"
the next "Hinckley, Booth, or Oswald,“
Noted that "guilty people" have more rights than "the
innocent“
18. 18
District Misstep: Staff Venting
Outcome
Principal suspended
Later reinstated with restriction that he no longer
work with special education students
Underwent psychological evaluation and drug
test before being reinstated
Bottom Line
If you need to vent, do it privately
Definitely not in front of student advocate!
Oxford, PA Area High School
19. 19
Reimbursement-Primary Purpose
Munir v. Pottsville Area School District
(M.D. Pa., June 14, 2012)
Facts
17-year old boy with severe depression
Hospitalized in 2005, series of hospitalizations in
2008
Generally maintained in school with Bs and Cs
District offered 504 plan in November 2008
20. 20
Reimbursement
Facts
Parent placed in residential facility, then private
boarding school
Parents filed for hearing, requested
reimbursement from District
Finding
In favor of District
District court agreed
Munir v. Pottsville Area Sch. Dist. (M.D. PA., June 14, 2012)
21. 21
Reimbursement
Ruling
Parents not entitled to reimbursement
because primary purpose of placement was
medical, not educational
Munir v. Pottsville Area Sch. Dist. (M.D. PA., June 14, 2012)
22. 22
Reimbursement
Bottom Line: Where primary purpose of
residential placement is to address
emotional needs and student had no
demonstrated educational deficiencies,
ancillary educational benefits do not entitle
parents to reimbursement
23. 23
High School Transition Plans
Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District
(OAH 2012)
Fact
HS student challenged graduation with diploma
as denial of FAPE alleging
Not prepared academically, socially, or functionally for
graduation
24. 24
High School Transition Plans
Ruling
IEP must include measurable post-secondary
goals
However, districts are not required to ensure students
are successful in achieving all of their transition goals
Graduation from high school with a diploma
terminated special education service
Student v. Los Angeles USD (OAH 2012)
25. 25
High School Transition Plans
Bottom Line
IEP that identifies student's post-secondary
interests and is reasonably calculated to provide
some educational benefit meets requirements of
IDEA
26. 26
Eligibility
Student v. San Rafael City Schools (OAH 2012)
Facts
Student had difficult-to-define special education
needs
Parents vigorously opposed eligibility due to
autistic-like behaviors
Claimed eligibility category drives placement
Inaccurate classification = denial of FAPE
27. 27
Eligibility
Ruling
Eligibility categories serve as gatekeepers for
special education
Accuracy of a student's eligibility category is not
relevant so long as the student is receiving a
FAPE
Student v. San Rafael City Schools (OAH 2012)
29. 29
Administering Anti-Seizure Medicine
Nonmedical school employees may
volunteer to administer anti-seizure
medication
Diastat is currently the only FDA-approved
Emergency regulations are in place through
approximately December 14, 2012
Permanent CDE guidelines for training and
supervision of volunteers are forthcoming
30. 30
Administering Anti-Seizure Medicine
Emergency regulations cover
Training and supervision
Circumstances where emergency provision of
medication is allowed
See the California Department of Education
website for extensive guidance
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/he/hn/epilepsymedadmin.asp
31. 31
Hughes Bill
BIP mandate is operative
Governor's proposal to suspend mandate
rejected
Trailer bill’s partial repeal failed
Hearing before State Mandate Commission
in January 2013
To consider reimbursement of $10.64 per ADA
32. 32
Transitional Kindergarten
Districts must provide the same special education
services
for students in transitional kindergarten
as in kindergarten
Requirement for special education services for
children age three and older remains in effect
Districts may receive funding for eligible TK
children
Revenue limit funding
AB 602 funding
Any other applicable categorical program funding
33. 33
New and Proposed Legislation
Mental Health Updates
California Children’s Services' (CCS)
Medical Therapy Program (MTP)
Health Care Coverage: ABA Therapy
High School Graduation
On the Horizon –
If the tax initiative fails . . .
34. 34
Mental Health Updates
Shift to funding allocation based on ADA
(money will no longer follow individual
children with special needs)
Prop. 98 Mental Health funds are not
contingent on passage of the Governor's tax
initiative in November
Early Mental Health Initiative was line-item
vetoed by Governor Brown
35. 35
Mental Health Updates
Accessing Medi-Cal dollars for Mental Health
Services
Medi-Cal funding available by contracting with mental
health agencies approved as Early and Periodic
Screening Diagnosis and Treatment (“EPSDT”)
providers
Workgroup examining alternative means of accessing
Medi-Cal funds. Proposed solutions include
Changing the law to allow more liberal billing under Medi-Cal, or
Giving educational institutions status as medical agencies to
allow access to Medi-Cal dollars
36. 36
Cautionary Tips
“Day Treatment” has a specific meaning
Services should be “unbundled”
Counseling, therapy, education, and other
services should be identified with specificity on
the IEP
Wrap-around is not an IEP service –
unbundle!
37. 37
California Children’s Services (CCS)
CCS has not been repealed
CDE’s 2010 Guidelines for Occupational
Therapy and Physical Therapy de-published
For recommendations see Letter Re: California
Children’s Services Obligations to Provide IEP-
Based Occupational and Physical Therapy
Services
38. 38
Health Care Coverage: ABA Therapy
Health insurers
Required to cover behavioral therapy, including
ABA therapy, for individuals with autism and
PDD
What this means
Without clearly defined "medically necessary“
services, the effect of this legislation on special
education services is unclear
39. 39
Health Care Coverage: ABA Therapy
What Is Clear
School districts are still responsible for
educationally necessary services
Services are reimbursable regardless of site
of delivery
Medically necessary ABA services by private
insurance companies on school sites are
problematic
Parents should request the services at home
to avoid these complications until the
implications are clear
40. 40
High School Graduation
Students with disabilities are exempt from
CAHSEE requirement until the BOE
determines the feasibility of an alterative
Proposed CAHSEE Alternative
Tier I: Use CST testing
Tier II: Task-based work samples
41. 41
High School Graduation
Exemption from high school exit exam
extended until June 30, 2015
Possible CAHSEE waiver for basic score on
the CST for grade 10 ELA and/or Algebra I
or proficient score on the CMA for grade 10
ELA or Algebra 1
42. 42
On the Horizon . . .
If the Governor's tax initiative fails
Potential for shortened school year (may be
reduced to 160 days)
Impact on ESY and regression plans
Impact on IEPs: Delineating specific number
could result in noncompliance
Example: OT services twice weekly throughout
school year, rather than OT 2X/week for 48 weeks
Impact on Basic Aid Districts
Weighted Pupil Formula
43. Information in this presentation, including but not limited to PowerPoint handouts and the presenters' comments, is summary only and not legal advice.
We advise you to consult with legal counsel to determine how this information may apply to your specific facts and circumstances .
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP understands that the
state's financial situation must not impede student access
to educational opportunities. As advocates for excellent
education, we offer a series of financial awards for
students attending California public schools.
For more information, visit www.fagenfriedman.com
Celebrate Success
Education Awards