![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Strength of the Recovery]()
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Flexible Staffing Short
Semelhante a Flexible Staffing Short (20)
Último
Último (20)
Flexible Staffing Short
- 1. Preparing for the Flexible Staffing Explosion
- 5. Long-Term/Flexible Staffing Model Key Test: Will a core staff percentage of 80% = no core staff layoffs?
- 6. Long-Term/“Flexible Staffing” Model Pathway? Key Test: Will a core staff percentage of 50% = no core staff layoffs?
- 8. The savings story (Part I) Savings in Employment Burden Example based on reduced SUTA & W/C: Smaller percentage multiplied by a smaller core headcount Consider overall cost vs. hourly cost - +33% Inc. Productivity! Cost/unit vs. hourly wage Reduced Overtime Does not include “hidden” costs: Reduced efficiency, higher reject rates, absenteeism, and injuries * Express will always have lower SUTA – we have other jobs for workers – AND we tenaciously manage our worker’s comp. claims! **OT with a “less productive” worker is VERY costly!