Enerit, CEO, MIke Brogan presented at the Industrial Energy Technology Conference (IETC 2015) recently in New Orleans, USA. he presentation concentrated on the ISO 50001 Energy Planning process and why it is important the proper tools are used for carrying out energy review, identifying improvement opportunities and implementing a systematic approach for setting targets and prioritizing energy efficiency projects. The IETC is hosted by the Energy Systems Laboratory at Texas A&M University and the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources. It is a one-of-a kind conference featuring a topics important to industrial energy managers, utility experts, government program managers, vendors and others.

1. Implementing ISO 50001
Dr. Mike Brogan, CEO & Co-Founder
How ICT Helps

2. QSET
software
Energy
consultants
large MNC’s
(IS 393 software)
Members
EN/ISO
50001
committees
First installs:
buildings &
industry
EN 16001
software
deployed
Enerit ISO
50001
software
launched
20 years in Management System Software
1995 2004 2006 2008 2010 2011
Enerit
Founded

3. European Research Projects

4. Internationally recognised framework for systematic
energy management to:
 Develop a policy for more efficient use of energy
 Fix targets and objectives to meet the policy
 Use data to better understand and make decisions
about energy use
 Measure the results
 Review how well the policy works, and
 Continually improve energy management.
WHAT is ISO 50001 EnMS Standard?
 Aimed all types and size of organisations

5. Systematic vs. Business as Usual
Why ISO 50001?

7. References:
http://eetd.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/aceee_sep_paper.pdf
http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net/results.html
Systematic Approach – 10% Additional Savings

8. o Save cost of energy
o Your competitors are doing it – driven by customers
o Show “Green” credentials e.g. Harbec, AIB
o Demonstrate proven Best Practice in organization
o Tax Rebates or other cash benefits, e.g. Germany
o EU Energy Audits directive (UK ESOS, SI 286)
Why Companies get certified

9. Source – DOE http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net/results.html
67%
6%
18%
9%
Internal Staff Time
ISO 50001 / SEP Audit
External Technical
Assistance
M&T Equipment
The Costs Associated With ISO 50001 certification
© Enerit Ltd 2014

10. Why is Internal Staff Cost So Significant?
TIME WASTED?
Manually
Updating
Multiple
Spreadsheets
Replicating
Existing
Information
Lack of
Implementation
Experience
Ineffective
Communication
Lack of
Planning and
Follow up
Travel Between
Multiple Sites
Looking for
Current
Information

11. How ICT Reduces Internal Staff Time
Work
Anywhere
Manage More
People/
Projects
Increase
Collaboration
Eliminate
Spreadsheet
Admin
One “GoTo”
Location
Drive
Accountability
Share
Learnings
Leverage
Existing
Standards

12. Planning Inputs
Past and present
energy uses
Energy Review Planning Outputs
- Relevant variables
affecting significant
energy use
- Performance
Analyze energy use &
consumption
Identify areas of
significant energy use
and consumption
Identify opportunities
for improving energy
performance
Legal/other
requirements
- Energy baseline
- EnPI(s)
- Objectives
- Targets
- Action Plans
Getting Started – Energy Planning
http://www.energymanagertoday.com/kick-off-your-energy-management-
program-with-guesstimation-sankey-visualization-096549/

13. Energy Review
Analyze energy use and consumption
Determine Significant Energy Use (SEU)
Use available data, e.g.
o Bills, existing meter data
o Energy audits
o Engineering studies
o Industry Benchmarks
o Equipment inventory and ratings
o Maintenance logs
o Sankey diagrams
The energy review can be improved as the organization gains more experience with
energy data management and decision making based on energy data analysis.

14. Improvement Opportunities
• Suggestions
• Staff meetings
• Brainstorming workshops
• Energy audits
• Benchmarking
• Energy saving tips
• Review case studies
• Listen
• Metering reviews
• Maintenance reports
• Review new technologies
• Seminars, conferences
• Engineering analysis
techniques and modelling
• Lean, Six Sigma,
• Kaizen EnergyTreasure Hunts

15. Capturing Suggestions
15

16. Best Practice / Playbooks
Playbook with 73 Optimization Scenarios for Schools
Actions manually triggered in integrated EnMS software
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
DG CONNECT – Smart Cities & Sustainability
download available from
http://www.veryschool.eu/

17. Energy management
TOOL
Support to all aspects of ISO 50001 EnMS:
• Energy review
• Improvement opportunities
• Identification of significant Energy Users
• Audits
• Non conformities
• Meetings
• …
Operation and Maintenance
• Visualisation of performance data
• BMS alarms handling
• Trigger performance maintenance
(based on FDD)
Best Practice / Playbooks
http://www.cascade-eu.org

18. “IO Playbook” pre-
populated with Airport
specific reduction strategies
from ARCP.
Energy Manager can review
best practice playbook and
create actions
New Playbook item can be
added by authorised person
to share with other sites
Can be extended beyond
airports
Share best practices
between sites
Best Practice / Playbooks
http://www.cascade-eu.org

19. • Auto Warnings based on meter data and set rules proposes OS to follow-up to correct
the identified problem.
Automated Actions
Warnings based on data from smart
meter in classrooms
List of warnings
and related OS to
resolve
Actions
generated

20. ENERITTool
CASCADE
Ontology API
Virtuoso Server
Airport
Ontology
Fault Detection & Diagnosis
SCADA Alarms
Automated Actions
http://www.cascade-eu.org

21. Prioritising Opportunities
Consider:
• Estimated energy savings
• Business impacts/priorities
• Return on Investment
• Cost
• Complexity
• Environmental impacts
• Legal requirements
• Risk
• Funding
• Non-energy benefits
Organisation can decide
on its own criteria

22. 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑅𝑎𝑛𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝑇𝑆 𝑥 𝑃𝐵 𝑥 𝑇𝐹 𝑥 𝐺𝐻𝐺 𝑥 𝑁𝑅 𝑥 𝑆𝑆
Impact Factor Band Score
[TS] Total
Estimated
Savings
TS < €10,000 1
€10,000 < TS < €25,000 2
€25,000 < TS < €100,000 3
€100,000 < TS 4
[PB] Payback
Period
PB < 2 Years 4
2 Years < PB < 5 Years 3
5 Years < PB < 10 Years 2
10 Years < PB 1
[TF]
Timeframe
TF < 1 Years 4
1 Years < TF < 5 Years 3
5 Years < TF < 10 Years 2
10 Years < TF 1
[GHG] GHG
Scope 1 and 2
emissions
reduction
Zero: There is NO reduction of S1/S2 scope emissions 1
Low: Reduction of S1/S2 scope emissions is relatively low 2
Medium: There is a significant reduction of S1/S2 scope emissions 3
High: There is a high reductions of S1/S2 scope emissions 4
[NR] Impact on
Natural
Resources
Adverse impact to natural resources 1
No impact on natural resources 2
Positive impact on natural resources 3
[SS] Impact on
Social
Sustainability
Adverse impact to social sustainability 1
No impact on social sustainability 2
Positive impact on social sustainability 3
Prioritization Criteria

23. Decision Making & Action Planning
The priority rating results
can then be used by the
energy manager for
decision making and
action planning

24. Setting Objectives &Targets
SEUs quantified
IO assessed & prioritized
Set OverallTargets
o Set SEU Targets
o Select Actions
to meet targets

25. Assigning Actions
Assign responsibility
o SetTarget Date
o Track progress
Energy Management
Action Plans
Improvement
Opportunities
SEUs
Energy
consumption

26. What?
• ISO 50001 is a globally recognized framework for energy management
• Best practice (and rigorous) approach
• Not compliance – common sense way of working
Why?
• ISO 50001 EnMS is different from BAU
• Systematic approach is proven to provide 3-4 times more savings than project
based approach with payback (DoE SEP)
How?
• Use ICT systems (not just energy monitoring) to systemize your approach
(Build or buy an EnMS ICT support – add to M&T)
• Manages your information and communicate with all managers and staff
• Visualizes to motivate and track
• Defines real Objectives &Targets
• Makes informed decisions on selection of energy efficiency projects
Conclusions

27. Questions?
Contact: mike.brogan@enerit.com