SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 1
Baixar para ler offline
General Principle GCW
At the pilot site, groundwater circulation occurs from
the top of the aquifer to the bottom (termed “stan-
dard flow”). Groundwater enters the lower screen
section, is pumped upward inside the remediation
well, and exits the upper screen section. Induced
differences in pressure head establish and maintain
a 3-dimensional circulation cell around the GCW.
The groundwater captured by the circulation cell cir-
culates several times through the well before it is
released down-gradient. The vertical and horizontal
circulation flow patterns force water to move through
the entire aquifer portion within the circulation cell.
Especially areas of low permeability are intensively
penetrated. This improves mobilization, homogeni-
zation, dilution of contaminants, and distribution of
C-Mix for biodegradation. Groundwater circulation
increases the retention time in the sphere of influ-
ence of the GCW and the substrate addition is more
readily controlled and distributed.
The shallow part of the aquifer indicates partially ox-
idizing biodegradation of cis-DCE and VC under an-
aerobic conditions, whereas the supply of DO (0.1-
2.0 mg/l) originates from the capillary fringe area and
vadose zone. The degradation was also stimulated
via recirculated groundwater including ethene.
IEG- C-Mix
IEG C-Mix, a nutritive preparation of alcohols, sac-
charides, proteins, vitamins and minerals create
an environment in the groundwater circulation that
supports biological degradation of contaminants. Al-
cohols and saccharides serve as an energy source
for microorganisms. Proteins have structural or me-
chanical functions in the microbial cell. Vitamins
are essential for dehalogenase enzyme production.
Minerals are necessary co-factors for microbial en-
zymes. IEG uses C-Mix in sites where low levels of
organic carbon, and the restricted availability of key
nutrients limit biodegradation.
GCW-C-Mix technology involves the stimulation of
native microbial populations in the subsurface, spe-
cifically for the purpose of permanently degrading
or transforming contaminants through reductive de-
chlorination.
To support anaerobic degradation, IEG C-Mix is dis-
solved and infused into an aquifer into the reinjection
line of the GCW or peripheral wells. C-Mix achieves
a fast and effective breakdown of contaminants in
the groundwater.
GCW-C-Mix technology offers many advantages
over other bioremediation techniques since it com-
bines effective flushing and an active distribution
system for bioremediation. The aquifer itself be-
comes a bioreactor that is hydraulically controlled.
In contrast to other hydraulic techniques, the circu-
lation zones permit more homogeneous dispersion
of substances in the treatment area of the GCW.
Aquifers frequently contain strong heterogeneities
and groundwater always takes the path of least re-
sistance. Since GCW injection and extraction rates
are equal, C-Mix can be conveyed into the higher
contaminated low permeable zones, so the total
quantity of C-Mix can be better predicted and sig-
nificantly reduced during operation.
The soluble reagents are perfused to multiple path-
ways in the GCW treatment zone by generating mi-
crobial degradation. Biodegradation is taking place
not only in conductive areas, but also in the former
none hydraulically accessible pore space. The ver-
tical hydraulic flow creates an additional mobiliza-
tion of contaminants from the non accessible pore
space into better permeable pores, where microbes
had adapted before.
IEG-Multilevel-Well-System (MLWS)
MLWS groundwater sam-
ples are extracted via a
mechanism consisting of a
piston drive, operating with-
in the cylinders and pumped
to the surface through flex-
ible hoses. Lip-packers are
attached to a central rod at
the top and bottom of the
well screens to separate the
screen areas and to create
small sampling chambers,
resulting in our having to
pump a small amount of wa-
ter.
Samples from the MLWS are
extracted from all chambers
simultaneously. The sam-
pling procedure always re-
mains the same and the lev-
el of the contaminants and
their locations are accurate.
Several MLWS can show the
contamination and degrada-
tion profile of the circulation
cell in three dimensions.
Site History
The site is situated in an industrial park of a large city
in Lower Saxony. From 1965 to 1985 this area was
used by several industrial manufacturers for chemi-
cal products using trichloroethene (TCE). GFS/IEG
setupaphysicalsiteremediation withaGroundwater
Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®) including in situ strip-
ping and off-gas treatment with activated carbon in
the source area in 1998. In the ensuing years, GFS/
IEG installed several GCW at the site for different
time periods and the entire GCW remediation was
concluded in 2010. Further assessment was carried
out up to 2011, where the highest concentrations
were found about 70 m down gradient of the source
area. Since May 2011 a pilot test employing only
in situ microbiological biodegradation via GCW and
IEG-C-Mix has been in progress in this area.
Site Characteristics
•	Pilot test area 600 m²: 120 m * 50 m
•	Groundwater level: 1.5 – 2.0 m bgs
•	Aquifer thickness: 7 m
•	Geology: fine to medium grained sands with thin
silty layers
•	Aquitard 9 m below ground
•	Total concentration of Cis-Dichlorethen (cis-DCE)
and Vinyl Chloride (VC) 10.000 μg/l
•	Hydraulic conductivity: Kh = 1*10-5 m/s
•	Hydraulic gradient: 0.005
•	Groundwater velocity: 7 m/year
•	Fe(III): 20 - 60 mg/l
•	Conductivity: 650 – 1.170 μs/cm
•	pH: 6.8 – 7.4
•	Dissolved oxygen (DO): 0.15 – 2.0 mg/l
•	Stagnation point GCW: 35 m
•	Capture zone GCW aquifer bottom (Bb): 100 m
•	Pore volume exchange at 20 m ROI: 25 times/year
Remediation Process
Before GFS/IEG started the remediation project, the
original parent compound TCE was no longer pres-
ent in the groundwater through natural degradation
under iron-reducing conditions. Initially, we ana-
lyzed high cis-DCE (95%), VC (5%) concentrations,
and very low concentrations of trans-Dichlorethen
(trans-DCE).
Due to the minimal space availability at the site, and
as microbiological remediation became more prov-
en and accepted as a superior, more cost effective,
and more ecologically friendly, the client and the au-
thorities agreed upon a combination of GCW with
an anaerobic microbiological in situ process.
IEG-C-Mix consists of easily degradable alcohols,
saccharides, proteins, vitamins and minerals. For
infiltrating C-Mix, a GCW (250 mm) was drilled and
equipped with 2 m screen sections separated by
solid casing and an inflatable packer. The self-prim-
ing GCW pump with an electronic flow meter was
installed in an 800 mm subsurface vault. The C-Mix
metering system stays in 20 m distance installed in
a small container. Consequently, the site was not
restricted because there was practically no above
ground installation. Additionally, the remediation
system emitted no sound.
Monitoring
Three MLWS were installed around the GCW for
monitoring and control. Each well has 4 sampling
ports at different depths (2.75 m, 4.75 m, 6.75 m,
8.75 m bgs). For the first two months of the pilot test,
MLWS sampling was carried out every week at all
sampling ports analyzing cis-DCE, trans-DCE, VC,
ethene, DOC, and groundwater parameters. After-
wards, the sampling was made every 2 to 4 weeks.
Additionally, the monitoring wells KB 16 -17 were
sampled regularly. Groundwater levels in all avail-
able monitoring wells were measured monthly. The
flow rate of the circulation pump and the injection
rate of the C-Mix metering system were controlled
daily.
Remediation Progress
The initial GCW influent concentration of 650 µg/l
cis-DCE and VC had been reduced to 30 µg/l af-
ter 6 weeks of operation. After stopping the C-Mix
infusion on a trial basis the influent concentrations
rebounded to original values. Since October 2011
the influent and effluent concentrations of the GCW
have decreased to smaller than 5 µg/l cis-DCE and
VC.
An accumulation of cis-DCE and VC couldn’t be de-
tected in the MLWS and monitoring wells. There has
been a correlation between the increasing values of
ethene and the decreasing values of cis-DCE. After
several weeks of operation, the groundwater tem-
perature in the influent rose to 24 °C.
In the sealed well head of the GCW the CO2 con-
centrations rise to 20% and the CH4 concentration
to 0.4%, because of degassing circulating ground-
water. The pH in the circulating groundwater de-
creased below 5.
At MLWS 2 (distance 10 m) nearest to the GCW the
concentrations decreased in all sampling ports after
6 months of operations. Some ports were reduced
below 1% of the original concentration.
MLWS 3 (distance 20 m) showed increasing con-
centrations in the uppermost sampling port and the
lower ports showed a significant reduction. The in-
creasing concentrations show the effective mobi-
lization of contaminants from the fluctuation zone
through the GCW. Especially in the deeper sam-
pling ports MLWS 3/3 and MLWS 3/4 an increasing
concentration of ethene from 3 µg/l to 470 µg/l was
observed.
The concentrations in the upper sampling ports at
MLWS 1 were reduced, while the deeper sampling
ports showed an increase in the mobilization of con-
taminants with the capture zone towards the GCW.
Monitoring wells KB 16 and KB 18 screened in the
upper part of the aquifer showed a reduction from
2-8% of the initial value after 6 months of operation.
The results indicate that after a short period of C-Mix
addition, a bioreactive zone is established where
degradation processes occur. The Radius of influ-
ence of degradation (ROD) can be fixed between
20-25 m.
More than 20 monitoring wells outside of the GCW
radius of influence (ROI) of about 35 m indicate no
mobilization of contaminants out of the circulation.
Lessons Learned
•	Bioreactive zone around GCW showed decrease in
cis-DCE and VC concentrations from 650 to 30 µg/l
•	No increase and accumulation of metabolites
•	Decrease pH, groundwater temperature
•	Formation of CO2 and CH4
•	Ethene is an indicator for complete reductive de-
chlorination
•	Sequential anaerobic/aerobic degradation exists
•	2000 kg C-Mix was added into the circulation
•	Constant circulation rate 2 m³/h, resulting in <
16,000 m³ circulated groundwater
•	Radius of Influence (ROI) of GCW 25 m
•	Radius of degradation (ROD) of GCW 20 -25 m
•	No groundwater drawdown
•	Pore volume of the aquifer at a distance of 20 m
ROI was exchanged 25 time/ year
•	During remediation spatiotemporal differences in
degradation occur
•	No downstream mobilization
•	No additional groundwater treatment was required
•	3 additional GCW for a full scale remediation
Groundwater Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®) employing C-Mix in Lower Saxony, Germany
Addition of a nutritive preparation of C-Mix via GCW for anaerobic biodegradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons (CHC)
Vitamins
Proteins
Minerals
SaccharidesAlcohols
IEG Technologie GmbH
Hohlbachweg 2
D-73344 Gruibingen
Tel:	 +49 7335 / 969 76-0
Fax:	+49 7335 / 969 76-40
eduard.alesi@ieg-technology.com
www.ieg-technology.com

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...
Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...
Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...
MUNANURA JAMES
 
SPE-177709 LRP_Paper
SPE-177709 LRP_PaperSPE-177709 LRP_Paper
SPE-177709 LRP_Paper
mid13
 
Usborne thesis presentation with notes
Usborne thesis presentation with notesUsborne thesis presentation with notes
Usborne thesis presentation with notes
Elizabeth Usborne
 
Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002
Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002
Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002
Alexey Konoplev
 
Modelling of Seawater Intrusion
Modelling of Seawater IntrusionModelling of Seawater Intrusion
Modelling of Seawater Intrusion
C. P. Kumar
 

Mais procurados (20)

Spe 151819-ms
Spe 151819-msSpe 151819-ms
Spe 151819-ms
 
Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...
Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...
Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal [Read-Only] [Compatibi...
 
SPE-177709 LRP_Paper
SPE-177709 LRP_PaperSPE-177709 LRP_Paper
SPE-177709 LRP_Paper
 
groundwater
groundwatergroundwater
groundwater
 
Pumping test
Pumping testPumping test
Pumping test
 
Usborne thesis presentation with notes
Usborne thesis presentation with notesUsborne thesis presentation with notes
Usborne thesis presentation with notes
 
Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002
Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002
Konoplev_Lake_Constance_2002
 
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
Application of Buckley-Leverett Equation in Modeling the Radius of Invasion i...
 
UNDERC-Report
UNDERC-ReportUNDERC-Report
UNDERC-Report
 
Self purification of stream new
Self purification of stream newSelf purification of stream new
Self purification of stream new
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
 
Wright nott
Wright nottWright nott
Wright nott
 
Self purification of river-streams
Self purification of river-streamsSelf purification of river-streams
Self purification of river-streams
 
The Self Purification Model for Water Pollution
	The Self Purification Model for Water Pollution	The Self Purification Model for Water Pollution
The Self Purification Model for Water Pollution
 
Self purification of river water
Self purification of river waterSelf purification of river water
Self purification of river water
 
Modelling of Seawater Intrusion
Modelling of Seawater IntrusionModelling of Seawater Intrusion
Modelling of Seawater Intrusion
 
Applications of colloidal gas aphrons for pollution remediation
Applications of colloidal gas aphrons for pollution remediationApplications of colloidal gas aphrons for pollution remediation
Applications of colloidal gas aphrons for pollution remediation
 
Gas Production Technology
Gas Production TechnologyGas Production Technology
Gas Production Technology
 
reservoir engineering
reservoir engineeringreservoir engineering
reservoir engineering
 
0509 presentation to_rwqcb
0509 presentation to_rwqcb0509 presentation to_rwqcb
0509 presentation to_rwqcb
 

Destaque

Destaque (14)

ヒト型レスキューロボットコンテストの試み
ヒト型レスキューロボットコンテストの試みヒト型レスキューロボットコンテストの試み
ヒト型レスキューロボットコンテストの試み
 
Classifiche 5° cross delle terme - Angolo
Classifiche 5° cross delle terme - AngoloClassifiche 5° cross delle terme - Angolo
Classifiche 5° cross delle terme - Angolo
 
marutsu make lab ものづくり相談会
marutsu make lab ものづくり相談会marutsu make lab ものづくり相談会
marutsu make lab ものづくり相談会
 
2INPUT COMPARATORの等価回路モデル
2INPUT COMPARATORの等価回路モデル2INPUT COMPARATORの等価回路モデル
2INPUT COMPARATORの等価回路モデル
 
Classifica Assoluta Sonvico
Classifica Assoluta SonvicoClassifica Assoluta Sonvico
Classifica Assoluta Sonvico
 
Inti charleroi-liege-2016-aac
Inti charleroi-liege-2016-aacInti charleroi-liege-2016-aac
Inti charleroi-liege-2016-aac
 
1
11
1
 
Calendario aggiornato Minivolley Under 12
Calendario aggiornato Minivolley Under 12Calendario aggiornato Minivolley Under 12
Calendario aggiornato Minivolley Under 12
 
アナログシンセサイザー製作事例
アナログシンセサイザー製作事例アナログシンセサイザー製作事例
アナログシンセサイザー製作事例
 
Branislav Nusic, Kirija
Branislav Nusic, KirijaBranislav Nusic, Kirija
Branislav Nusic, Kirija
 
О плавом чуперку
О  плавом чуперкуО  плавом чуперку
О плавом чуперку
 
Личне заменице
Личне заменицеЛичне заменице
Личне заменице
 
Како је време спасило љубав
Како је време спасило љубавКако је време спасило љубав
Како је време спасило љубав
 
Music Labels
Music LabelsMusic Labels
Music Labels
 

Semelhante a poster_c-mix 2014 small

Hall, Ryan_DWRC Poster
Hall, Ryan_DWRC PosterHall, Ryan_DWRC Poster
Hall, Ryan_DWRC Poster
Ryan Hall
 
Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...
Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...
Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...
Lindsay Swearingen
 
MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment
MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment
MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment
Kyra Berger
 
Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludge
Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludgeTreatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludge
Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludge
Alvaro Huete
 
4. reverse osmosis
4. reverse osmosis4. reverse osmosis
4. reverse osmosis
safwan patel
 
Commissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technology
Commissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technologyCommissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technology
Commissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technology
adital
 
Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010
Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010
Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010
James Peale
 
Disinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water Lines
Disinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water LinesDisinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water Lines
Disinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water Lines
Engineer Imtiaz Rehman
 

Semelhante a poster_c-mix 2014 small (20)

Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...
Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...
Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...
 
ENA via Groundwater Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®)
ENA via Groundwater Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®)ENA via Groundwater Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®)
ENA via Groundwater Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®)
 
Hall, Ryan_DWRC Poster
Hall, Ryan_DWRC PosterHall, Ryan_DWRC Poster
Hall, Ryan_DWRC Poster
 
ASTP.pptx
ASTP.pptxASTP.pptx
ASTP.pptx
 
Research: A new process to remove salt and organic compounds from frack waste...
Research: A new process to remove salt and organic compounds from frack waste...Research: A new process to remove salt and organic compounds from frack waste...
Research: A new process to remove salt and organic compounds from frack waste...
 
Ge remove oxygen
Ge   remove oxygenGe   remove oxygen
Ge remove oxygen
 
1045 1050
1045 10501045 1050
1045 1050
 
Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...
Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...
Combining Solar Technology with Sustained and Controlled Release Reactants - ...
 
MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment
MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment
MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Treatment
 
20120140503008 2
20120140503008 220120140503008 2
20120140503008 2
 
Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludge
Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludgeTreatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludge
Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up flow anaerobic sludge
 
Biological and Advanced Water Treatment.pptx
Biological and Advanced Water Treatment.pptxBiological and Advanced Water Treatment.pptx
Biological and Advanced Water Treatment.pptx
 
Ttp – Ro System
Ttp – Ro SystemTtp – Ro System
Ttp – Ro System
 
4. reverse osmosis
4. reverse osmosis4. reverse osmosis
4. reverse osmosis
 
4. reverse osmosis
4. reverse osmosis4. reverse osmosis
4. reverse osmosis
 
Commissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technology
Commissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technologyCommissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technology
Commissioning of large wwtp with flat sheet mbr technology
 
Wastewater pretreatment methods for constructed wetland: Review
Wastewater pretreatment methods for constructed wetland: ReviewWastewater pretreatment methods for constructed wetland: Review
Wastewater pretreatment methods for constructed wetland: Review
 
Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010
Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010
Successful ISCR-Enhanced Bioremediation - Summer 2010
 
Disinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water Lines
Disinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water LinesDisinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water Lines
Disinfection and Chlorination of Potable Water Lines
 
Aeration and agitation
Aeration and agitationAeration and agitation
Aeration and agitation
 

poster_c-mix 2014 small

  • 1. General Principle GCW At the pilot site, groundwater circulation occurs from the top of the aquifer to the bottom (termed “stan- dard flow”). Groundwater enters the lower screen section, is pumped upward inside the remediation well, and exits the upper screen section. Induced differences in pressure head establish and maintain a 3-dimensional circulation cell around the GCW. The groundwater captured by the circulation cell cir- culates several times through the well before it is released down-gradient. The vertical and horizontal circulation flow patterns force water to move through the entire aquifer portion within the circulation cell. Especially areas of low permeability are intensively penetrated. This improves mobilization, homogeni- zation, dilution of contaminants, and distribution of C-Mix for biodegradation. Groundwater circulation increases the retention time in the sphere of influ- ence of the GCW and the substrate addition is more readily controlled and distributed. The shallow part of the aquifer indicates partially ox- idizing biodegradation of cis-DCE and VC under an- aerobic conditions, whereas the supply of DO (0.1- 2.0 mg/l) originates from the capillary fringe area and vadose zone. The degradation was also stimulated via recirculated groundwater including ethene. IEG- C-Mix IEG C-Mix, a nutritive preparation of alcohols, sac- charides, proteins, vitamins and minerals create an environment in the groundwater circulation that supports biological degradation of contaminants. Al- cohols and saccharides serve as an energy source for microorganisms. Proteins have structural or me- chanical functions in the microbial cell. Vitamins are essential for dehalogenase enzyme production. Minerals are necessary co-factors for microbial en- zymes. IEG uses C-Mix in sites where low levels of organic carbon, and the restricted availability of key nutrients limit biodegradation. GCW-C-Mix technology involves the stimulation of native microbial populations in the subsurface, spe- cifically for the purpose of permanently degrading or transforming contaminants through reductive de- chlorination. To support anaerobic degradation, IEG C-Mix is dis- solved and infused into an aquifer into the reinjection line of the GCW or peripheral wells. C-Mix achieves a fast and effective breakdown of contaminants in the groundwater. GCW-C-Mix technology offers many advantages over other bioremediation techniques since it com- bines effective flushing and an active distribution system for bioremediation. The aquifer itself be- comes a bioreactor that is hydraulically controlled. In contrast to other hydraulic techniques, the circu- lation zones permit more homogeneous dispersion of substances in the treatment area of the GCW. Aquifers frequently contain strong heterogeneities and groundwater always takes the path of least re- sistance. Since GCW injection and extraction rates are equal, C-Mix can be conveyed into the higher contaminated low permeable zones, so the total quantity of C-Mix can be better predicted and sig- nificantly reduced during operation. The soluble reagents are perfused to multiple path- ways in the GCW treatment zone by generating mi- crobial degradation. Biodegradation is taking place not only in conductive areas, but also in the former none hydraulically accessible pore space. The ver- tical hydraulic flow creates an additional mobiliza- tion of contaminants from the non accessible pore space into better permeable pores, where microbes had adapted before. IEG-Multilevel-Well-System (MLWS) MLWS groundwater sam- ples are extracted via a mechanism consisting of a piston drive, operating with- in the cylinders and pumped to the surface through flex- ible hoses. Lip-packers are attached to a central rod at the top and bottom of the well screens to separate the screen areas and to create small sampling chambers, resulting in our having to pump a small amount of wa- ter. Samples from the MLWS are extracted from all chambers simultaneously. The sam- pling procedure always re- mains the same and the lev- el of the contaminants and their locations are accurate. Several MLWS can show the contamination and degrada- tion profile of the circulation cell in three dimensions. Site History The site is situated in an industrial park of a large city in Lower Saxony. From 1965 to 1985 this area was used by several industrial manufacturers for chemi- cal products using trichloroethene (TCE). GFS/IEG setupaphysicalsiteremediation withaGroundwater Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®) including in situ strip- ping and off-gas treatment with activated carbon in the source area in 1998. In the ensuing years, GFS/ IEG installed several GCW at the site for different time periods and the entire GCW remediation was concluded in 2010. Further assessment was carried out up to 2011, where the highest concentrations were found about 70 m down gradient of the source area. Since May 2011 a pilot test employing only in situ microbiological biodegradation via GCW and IEG-C-Mix has been in progress in this area. Site Characteristics • Pilot test area 600 m²: 120 m * 50 m • Groundwater level: 1.5 – 2.0 m bgs • Aquifer thickness: 7 m • Geology: fine to medium grained sands with thin silty layers • Aquitard 9 m below ground • Total concentration of Cis-Dichlorethen (cis-DCE) and Vinyl Chloride (VC) 10.000 μg/l • Hydraulic conductivity: Kh = 1*10-5 m/s • Hydraulic gradient: 0.005 • Groundwater velocity: 7 m/year • Fe(III): 20 - 60 mg/l • Conductivity: 650 – 1.170 μs/cm • pH: 6.8 – 7.4 • Dissolved oxygen (DO): 0.15 – 2.0 mg/l • Stagnation point GCW: 35 m • Capture zone GCW aquifer bottom (Bb): 100 m • Pore volume exchange at 20 m ROI: 25 times/year Remediation Process Before GFS/IEG started the remediation project, the original parent compound TCE was no longer pres- ent in the groundwater through natural degradation under iron-reducing conditions. Initially, we ana- lyzed high cis-DCE (95%), VC (5%) concentrations, and very low concentrations of trans-Dichlorethen (trans-DCE). Due to the minimal space availability at the site, and as microbiological remediation became more prov- en and accepted as a superior, more cost effective, and more ecologically friendly, the client and the au- thorities agreed upon a combination of GCW with an anaerobic microbiological in situ process. IEG-C-Mix consists of easily degradable alcohols, saccharides, proteins, vitamins and minerals. For infiltrating C-Mix, a GCW (250 mm) was drilled and equipped with 2 m screen sections separated by solid casing and an inflatable packer. The self-prim- ing GCW pump with an electronic flow meter was installed in an 800 mm subsurface vault. The C-Mix metering system stays in 20 m distance installed in a small container. Consequently, the site was not restricted because there was practically no above ground installation. Additionally, the remediation system emitted no sound. Monitoring Three MLWS were installed around the GCW for monitoring and control. Each well has 4 sampling ports at different depths (2.75 m, 4.75 m, 6.75 m, 8.75 m bgs). For the first two months of the pilot test, MLWS sampling was carried out every week at all sampling ports analyzing cis-DCE, trans-DCE, VC, ethene, DOC, and groundwater parameters. After- wards, the sampling was made every 2 to 4 weeks. Additionally, the monitoring wells KB 16 -17 were sampled regularly. Groundwater levels in all avail- able monitoring wells were measured monthly. The flow rate of the circulation pump and the injection rate of the C-Mix metering system were controlled daily. Remediation Progress The initial GCW influent concentration of 650 µg/l cis-DCE and VC had been reduced to 30 µg/l af- ter 6 weeks of operation. After stopping the C-Mix infusion on a trial basis the influent concentrations rebounded to original values. Since October 2011 the influent and effluent concentrations of the GCW have decreased to smaller than 5 µg/l cis-DCE and VC. An accumulation of cis-DCE and VC couldn’t be de- tected in the MLWS and monitoring wells. There has been a correlation between the increasing values of ethene and the decreasing values of cis-DCE. After several weeks of operation, the groundwater tem- perature in the influent rose to 24 °C. In the sealed well head of the GCW the CO2 con- centrations rise to 20% and the CH4 concentration to 0.4%, because of degassing circulating ground- water. The pH in the circulating groundwater de- creased below 5. At MLWS 2 (distance 10 m) nearest to the GCW the concentrations decreased in all sampling ports after 6 months of operations. Some ports were reduced below 1% of the original concentration. MLWS 3 (distance 20 m) showed increasing con- centrations in the uppermost sampling port and the lower ports showed a significant reduction. The in- creasing concentrations show the effective mobi- lization of contaminants from the fluctuation zone through the GCW. Especially in the deeper sam- pling ports MLWS 3/3 and MLWS 3/4 an increasing concentration of ethene from 3 µg/l to 470 µg/l was observed. The concentrations in the upper sampling ports at MLWS 1 were reduced, while the deeper sampling ports showed an increase in the mobilization of con- taminants with the capture zone towards the GCW. Monitoring wells KB 16 and KB 18 screened in the upper part of the aquifer showed a reduction from 2-8% of the initial value after 6 months of operation. The results indicate that after a short period of C-Mix addition, a bioreactive zone is established where degradation processes occur. The Radius of influ- ence of degradation (ROD) can be fixed between 20-25 m. More than 20 monitoring wells outside of the GCW radius of influence (ROI) of about 35 m indicate no mobilization of contaminants out of the circulation. Lessons Learned • Bioreactive zone around GCW showed decrease in cis-DCE and VC concentrations from 650 to 30 µg/l • No increase and accumulation of metabolites • Decrease pH, groundwater temperature • Formation of CO2 and CH4 • Ethene is an indicator for complete reductive de- chlorination • Sequential anaerobic/aerobic degradation exists • 2000 kg C-Mix was added into the circulation • Constant circulation rate 2 m³/h, resulting in < 16,000 m³ circulated groundwater • Radius of Influence (ROI) of GCW 25 m • Radius of degradation (ROD) of GCW 20 -25 m • No groundwater drawdown • Pore volume of the aquifer at a distance of 20 m ROI was exchanged 25 time/ year • During remediation spatiotemporal differences in degradation occur • No downstream mobilization • No additional groundwater treatment was required • 3 additional GCW for a full scale remediation Groundwater Circulation Well (IEG-GCW®) employing C-Mix in Lower Saxony, Germany Addition of a nutritive preparation of C-Mix via GCW for anaerobic biodegradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons (CHC) Vitamins Proteins Minerals SaccharidesAlcohols IEG Technologie GmbH Hohlbachweg 2 D-73344 Gruibingen Tel: +49 7335 / 969 76-0 Fax: +49 7335 / 969 76-40 eduard.alesi@ieg-technology.com www.ieg-technology.com