EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction
•Transferir como PPTX, PDF•
0 gostou•453 visualizações
Introduction slides by Lee Allison, AZGS, at the EarthCube Portfolio Workshop
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (6)
Semelhante a EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction
Semelhante a EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction (20)
Mais de EarthCube
Mais de EarthCube (20)
Último
Último (20)
EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction
- 1. EARTHCUBE COMMUNITY EarthCube Portfolio Workshop Boulder CO February 12-14, 2014
- 2. WORKSHOP GOALS Seek guidance on a community-based plan to further cyberinfrastructure in the geosciences Assess needs, visions, opportunities, and challenges of the EarthCube builders for system architecture Identify ways the EarthCube Commons can support this community
- 3. EARTHCUBE TEST ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE An agile approach to design a system that catalyzes the field and works for the community How do we link your tools, standards, and skills to create EarthCube?
- 4. Organizational timeline – Year 1 Stakeholders (Assembly) – governance ideas, testing Integrate stakeholder concepts crowdsource Synthesize and recommend to NSF Demo phase Governance charter Governance timeline – Year 2 Establish Organizational Demo Facilitate convergence on system design, data standards Evaluate results: basis for long term organization NSF solicitation?
- 5. WHAT IS EARTHCUBE “GOVERNANCE?” Resistance is futile! Not imposition of unwanted command and control
- 6. EarthCube governance is a blank canvas We are looking to you to paint the future
- 8. Providing a „backbone‟ to help build community Governance is finding solutions to specific problems, fostering trust, reconciling interests, and coordinating communities.
- 9. INITIAL COMMUNITY FUNCTIONS 1. Identify and Implement Vision, Mission, and Goals 2. Engage and Coordinate Across Community 3. Create and Implement By-Laws and Charter 4. Facilitate Agreement on and Maintain Viable Architecture and Concept of Operations that Enable Realization of Goals and Objectives of EarthCube Vision
- 10. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): EARTHCUBE ASSEMBLY Industry & FOSS: Instrumentation, Software, and Technology Developers EarthCube Awards Research Science Communities End-User Communities & Workshop Participants Data Facilities & Users IT/CS/ Information Scientists Professional Societies Assembly Advisory Council
- 11. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): EARTHCUBE ASSEMBLY Industry & FOSS: Instrumentation, Software, and Technology Developers EarthCube Awards Research Science Communities End-User Communities & Workshop Participants Assembly Advisory Council Data Facilities & Users IT/CS/ Information Scientists Professional Societies . . .
- 12. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): CROWDSOURCING
- 14. EARTHCUBE.ORG The “Informational Site” Portal Earthcube.org The “Workspace” The Workspace
- 15. Big Data Digital Government Big Earth Data Initiative Open Data Access CIF21
- 17. A CALL FOR YOUR INVOLVEMENT • Upcoming community workshops: Jan – March 2014 • All Hands Meeting, June 24-26, 2014, Washington, DC • Crowdsourcing: • Strategic Pathways exercises • Input & feedback on community models • Social Media – Twitter, Facebook • www.earthcube.org
Notas do Editor
- Agile – several advisory committee & a development evaluation team – allow us to quickly change course if things aren’t working or we’re not getting the results we want.
- Governance functions based on published governance research and community input. Specific sources include: Over 75 published research on governanceEarthCube Working Group and Concept Team draft roadmapsCommunity input during Governance Steering Committee virtual webinars – more than 30 webinarsJune charrette, July 2012 EarthCube Principle Investigator workshop, EarthCube sessions at the ESIP Federation Mid-Year Meeting in Madison, WI, July 17-20. #4 refers to the governance and organizational architecture and not any specific CI
- What about agencies, intl, other science communities?
- What about agencies, intl, other science communities?
- Need feedback from broad cross-section of geoscientists on their ideas on EarthCube governance, and test how they would react to different externalities (NSF funding, support from university/employer, etc.) through game theory.