Fundamental Elements 2017 Webinar 4

1. OS-NMA User Terminal
Flavio SBARDELLATI, Market Development Department
Kate BOUSFIELD-PARIS, Legal and Procurement Department
Giovanni LUCCHI, Project Control Office
Fundamental elements Webinar, 29th March 2017
This presentation can be interpreted only together with the oral comments accompanying it

2. 2
• Participants’ microphones are muted.
To avoid any echo, please switch off
your microphone.
• Make sure your speakers or
headphones are switched on, and turn
up the volume.
• To interact you can use the common
chat room. Questions to individual
participants will not be answered.
• Your questions will appear
anonymously to the other participants
Before we start – way of working (1/2)

3. 3
• Questions are collected and addressed at the end of the session, if
time allows it.
• All questions and answers will be published on the GSA website in
order to guarantee the equal treatment of tenderers/applicants.
• Slides and clarifications will be available in due course online after this
webinar.
• After the information session, you will receive a short satisfaction
questionnaire, please fill it in.
Before we start – way of working (2/2)

4.  TECHNICAL SCOPE
 PARTICIPATION AND EVALUATION
 CONTRACT
 GUIDELINES TO FILL IN THE FINANCIAL TABLES
 HOW TO PREPARE YOUR TENDER
 Q&A TIME
Agenda
4

5. TECHNICAL SCOPE
5

6. • Open Service Navigation Message Authentication Signal in Space transmission is
foreseen in 2018 while full service provision is planned in 2020.
• OS-NMA Specification for Signal-in-Space testing v.1.0 was disclosed in February
2017 allowing for OS-NMA implementation at chipset/receiver level.
• A new generation of user terminals enabled to exploit this feature needs to be
industrialised.
Background
6

7. • Development of a “close to market” OS-NMA User Terminal:
• Target application: The UT shall meet Smart Tachograph application’s requirements
• Level of maturity to carry out a demonstration in a representative environment (TRL 7+)
• Supply of qty. 3 units
• Development of a suitable end-to-end Validation Platform
Tender objectives (1/2)
7

8. • Extensive testing of the UT: anti-spoofing performance assessment
using:
• Real GNSS signals, and
• End-to-end Validation platform
Tender objectives (2/2)
8

9. • Implementing OS-NMA in accordance with [AD.1] (OS-NMA
specification for SiS testing v1.0)
• At data level, implementing cryptographic and rough synchronisation
functions required for OS-NMA (e.g. key management, algorithm
implementation, receiver logic)
• At signal level, including anti-replay protection by making an optimal use of
the unpredictable bit broadcast in the NMA data
Highest level of robustness (1/2)
9

10. • Additional anti-spoofing capability:
• A list of mandatory measures defined in the tender spec (sect. 2.2.7.2)
• Protection against the full list of spoofing threats identified by the tenderer
• A list of optional measures proposed by the contractor to achieve the best
possible PVT solution in terms of robustness and reliability
Highest level of robustness (2/2)
10

11. 11
Stepwise approach

12.  First UT (v.1 featuring OS-NMA)
developed
 Validation platform developed
 UT v.1 extensively tested
‒ Real SiS
‒ Validation platform
Two-stage project
12
 Final UT (v.2 with full anti-
spoofing capability) developed
 Validation platform upgraded
 UT v.2 extensively tested
‒ Real SiS
‒ Validation platform
 Qty. 1 proto unit delivered  Qty. 2 proto units delivered
STAGE 1 STAGE 2

13. 13
End-to-end Validation platform

14. • The contractor, upon the GSA’s approval and tools’ availability, shall
be granted access on request to the following items:
• GNSS Simulator
• Spoofing Generator
• Experimentation NMA Module
• Description of the tools available in the next slides.
Customer Furnished Items (CFI)
14

15. • Generating E1BC in accordance with Galileo OS-NMA Scheme
 Spirent GSS9000 with 6x Signal Banks: GAL E1/E5/E6 + GPS L1/L2/L5
Up to 16 channels in all signal banks
- Generation of GAL E1BC with pre-computed INAV navigation data symbols in accordance with current
GAL OS-NMA scheme
- OS-NMA Module: SW tool calculating INAV data symbols for a given set of satellite ephemeris and
time window will be made available.
GNSS Simulation Capabilities

16. • Two possible solutions:
1. Using record and playback platform and a GNSS simulator:
- Spoofing attacks on the GPS/Galileo OS in L1 implemented pre-recording sequentially two
scenarios (baseline and spoofing) and combining them off-line into one IF dataset to be played
back.
- Sharing 10 MHz reference and a TRIG signal allows a very precise time alignment (<1 ns) of the
two scenarios.
2. Using two GNSS simulators currently available at the JRC: a Spirent GSS9000 and a
Spectracom GSG-64 (with GPS L1/L2/L5, GAL E1/E5).
- Time alignment of the two GNSS signals is much coarser in this case
Spoofing & Meaconing generation

17. • 2x NI USRP 2943R: Record and playback of IF data with 4,8, or 16 bit depth
• Up to two bands simultaneously recorded/played back at a sustained sampling
rate up to 100 Msmp/sec
• IF data streamed to/from an SATA SSD disk drive on the host PC running the
control software
Record and playback capability

18. Signal-in-Space testing
18
OS-NMA public key distribution:
• E-mail and publication on
GSC web portal for
registered users
• Public key renewal process
through SIS during testing
phase is TBC

19. • Coordination task:
‒ coordination with EC/GSA projects dealing with the OS-NMA, authentication and terminal
robustness concepts with the aim to collect and inject into the project any relevant input.
• Standardisation task:
‒ Definition of a standard architecture for the OS-NMA UT
‒ Recommendation for additional anti-spoofing techniques complementing OS-NMA against a
certain set of spoofing threats
‒ Definition of a standard approach to assess the protection level of the UT
‒ Identification of interfaces and APIs to enable a wide market uptake of OS-NMA
Transversal activities (1/2)
19

20. • Dissemination task:
‒ Of the achievements of the project among relevant stakeholders with the aim of fostering the
innovation created in the frame of the action and creating market awareness of the project’s
results.
• Engineering support to GSA/EC
‒ Fixed unit level of effort to provide support to the GSA and EC concerning the OS-NMA
implementation aspects.
Transversal activities (2/2)
20

21. Stage 1 - Milestones
Schedule
(indicative)
P1KOM Stage 1 Kick-Off meeting T0
SRR System Requirements Review T0+2m
DR Design Review T0+4m
TRR1 Test Readiness Review 1 T0+6m
TTVR Testing Tools Validation Review T0+6m
FR1 Final Review 1 T0+9m
Milestones plan
21
Stage 2 - Milestones
Schedule
(indicative)
P2KOM Stage 2 Kick-Off meeting T1
dDR delta Design Review T1+2m
TRR2 Test Readiness Review 2 T1+5m
FR2 Final Review 2 T1+11m

22. Maximum price: 2,500,000.00€
 Funding rate: 100%
 Total price of Stage 1 shall not exceed 45% of the Total Contract
Value
Procurement budget
22

23. TIMETABLE DATE Note
Launch of procurement process 15 February
Deadline for submission of clarifications 5 May 2017
Last date on which clarifications are published by the GSA 12 May 2017
Deadline for submission of tenders 19 May 2017
Opening of tenders 26 May 2017
Evaluation of tenders May – August 2017 Estimated
Award decision September 2017 Estimated
Contract signature October 2017 Estimated
Project timeline
23

24. PARTICIPATION AND EVALUATION
24

25. • All EU natural and legal persons and those from:
‒ Iceland
‒ Norway
‒ Liechtenstein
‒ Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
‒ Albania
‒ Montenegro
‒ Serbia and
‒ Bosnia and Herzegovina
Participation
25

26. • Assessment of the tender is done in sequential and eliminatory
stages:
Evaluation
26

27. • ALL entities (prime, consortium members, and subcontractors) must
fulfil the exclusion criteria
 complete Annex I.D.
Evaluation: exclusion criteria
27

28. • ALL entities (prime, consortium members, and subcontractors) must
fulfil the selection criteria unless indicated otherwise.
‒ Legal capacity  all entities
‒ Economic and financial capacity  see p.46 (note: “core” subcontractor)
‒ Technical and professional capacity  see p.47 (note: “core” subcontractor)
NOTE: Submit the evidence required for each capacity criterion (nb. the
maximum age of supporting documents)
Evaluation: selection criteria
28

29. • Tenderers must fulfil the minimum requirements in section 3.3 of
Annex I (prime, consortium members).
Evaluation: minimum requirements
29

30. • Qualitative and financial
Evaluation: award criteria
30

31. CONTRACT
31

32. • Conditional Stage Payment Contract
‒ Contract is divided into stages
‒ Contracting authority defines the conditions for starting the next stage or
terminating the contract at the end of the stage
‒ Payments are always limited per stage
Overview of the CSPC – intro
32

33. 1st Stage – development and supply of OS-NMA UT prototype –
details in section 1.3.1 of Annex I
2nd Stage – prototype performance assessment and supply–
details in section1.3.2 of Annex I
Overview of the CSPC – stages
33

34. • Conditions precedent for 2nd stage:
‒ GSA’s authorisation, given provided that:
(1) 1st contract stage successfully completed
AND
(2) the Galileo ground system and the satellite constellation are able to broadcast OS-NMA
Signal-in-Space (SiS) through E1-B I/NAV, such that it is objectively suitable to support the
tasks as foreseen and scheduled for 2nd contract stage
Overview of the CSPC – conditions
precedent for 2nd stage
34

35. • Read the draft contract carefully:
 this is only an overview of important points on ownership of results
and use of background IPR
IPR licensing conditions (1/5)
35

36. • Results (tangible and intangible) created under the contract shall be
vested in the EU, represented by the EC
• EU acquires a number of exclusive rights and modes of exploitation
IPR licensing conditions (2/5)
36

37. • Background IPR shall be declared as soon as the contractor is aware
of its need
• Contractor provides/ensures all necessary licenses over background
IPR to enable the the EU, GSA and institutional assignees/licensees to
use the Results for institutional purposes
IPR licensing conditions (3/5)
37

38. • Subject to compliance with contractual obligations, the contractor
and the contractor parties (incl. affiliates) obtain a non-transferable,
non-sub licensable, perpetual, unrestricted, free of charge, non-
exclusive right to use the results, including for commercialisation
purposes of products having embedded the results
IPR licensing conditions (4/5)
38

39. • Contractor shall provide license over background IPR licence upon
request where this is needed for commercial exploitation of the
results under fair, equal and reasonable market terms and conditions
IPR licensing conditions (5/5)
39

40. GUIDELINES TO FILL
THE FINANCIAL TABLES
40

41. • Annex I.K – Effort distribution
• Annex I.L – Financial Offer
‒Including Annex I.La substantiating the Financial Offer by
providing detailed cost element data
How to build the Financial Table
41

42. • WBS-E based (bottom-up approach)
• Define the labour cost, allocate it to tasks
• Differentiated sheets to be filled in by the prime and subcos/members (bottom-
up approach)
• Integrated approach – integration and consistency check in charge to the prime
(tenderer’s leader)
Approach
42

43. • WBS-E based
• The sum of the prices of the WBSE’s
has to be the total tender price.
• This price must match the price
reported in the Annex I.L – Financial
Offer sheet.
• It shall be assessed against the award
criteria (Q1)
Effort distribution – Annex I.K
43
Tenderer (full company name):
WP title
WBE id
(relating
to WP)
WBE Price (*)
(in % of the Total Overall Tender
price)
Share (%) of competitive
subcontracting (**)
(*) Totel Overall Price = PCS-A6 price + Task 7.1 PCS-A1 price + Task 7.2 PCS-A1 price
(**) Percentage of the WBE price which is subcontracted through a competitive tendering
Signature by tenderer's authorised representative:
_____________________________
Procurement/Contract Number:
GSA/OP/23/16 - Development, Supply and Testing of a Galileo Open
Service Authentication User Terminal (OS-NMA) for the GSA
Annex I.K - Effort Distribution

44.  Annex I.L: Financial Offer sheet, to be filled in by the Prime only
• PCS-A1 sheet
• Task 7.1 PCS-A1 sheet
• Task 7.2 PCS-A1 sheet
• Leader PCS-A2 sheet, to be filled in by the Prime
only
• Member_ PCS-A2 sheet
• PCS-A2 Exibit A sheet
• PCS-A2 Exibit B sheet
• PCS-A2 Exibit C sheet
• PCS-A4 sheet
• PCS-A6 sheet
• PCS-A8 sheet
Financial Tables – Annex I.L
44
 Annex I.La Price Cost sheets

45. 45
Financial Tables – Annex I.La - Logic

46. • Step 1 – PCS-A1
• Step 2 – in parallel (PCS-A8; PCS-A2 Exhibits A,B and C)
• Step 3 – PCS-A2
• Step 4 – Task 7.x PCS-A1
• Grouping by the prime to get Leader PCS-A2 Exhibit C
• PCS-A2 Exhibit C + Task 7.x PCS-A1  Financial Offer
Financial Offer generation
46

47. HOW TO PREPARE YOUR TENDER
47

48. • Documents must be submitted in accordance with double envelope
system
Tender package composition
48
Outer Envelope
Inner Envelope
#1
#2
#3

49. In accordance with tender specifications, sect. 4.5:
A. The Administrative files
B. The Technical Offer
C. The Financial Offer
Summary of the tenders
49

50. • Signed cover letter
• ID sheet
• Power of Attorney
• Submit subcontractor’s Letter of Intent
• Financial identification form
• Financial statements
• DOH
• Non-disclosure undertaking
• Statement re: minimum requirements
Administrative files (1/2)
50

51. Attention:
• Legal identity form – Annex I.B (download the applicable template
and do not forget to submit supporting documents* indicated on the
top of the downloaded template)
• Submit the required statements of authorisation*
Administrative files (2/2)
51

52. • Executive Summary (max 2 pages)
• Technical proposal addressing all matters laid down in the tender
specifications
‒ Pay attention to the elements listed in the TS, section 4.5.4
• Annex I.G – Technical and Professional Selection Criteria Cover Sheet
• Annex I.K – Effort distribution
• Annex II.III – Declaration of Background IPR
Technical Offer
52

53. • Annex I.L and I.La – Financial Table of Answers and Cost Statement
Forms
NOTE:
‒ Price elements of Annex I.L shall be fully aligned and supported by the
percentage figures presented in Annex I.K (included in the Technical Offer) with
no discrepancies.
‒ The level of detail and the justification of costs submitted in the Cost
Statement Forms (CSF) in Annex I.La shall be evaluated as part of the
qualitative award criteria (Q1).
Financial Offer
53

54. E-mail address: tenders@gsa.europa.eu
Tenders sent by express mail, commercial courier or post mail to
GSA Legal and Procurement Department
Janovského 438/2, 170 00, Prague 7, Czech Republic
Tender ref. GSA/OP/23/16
54
Tenders sent by hand-delivered should be addressed to the same postal
address not later than 19 May 2017 at 17.00 (CET)
Submit requests for clarifications by: 5 May 2017
Submit tenders by: 19 May 2017
Contact coordinates for the tender