Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
Minimally invasive sinus surgery by P. Nicolai
1. The International Federation
of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies
Current Concepts in Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology 2012
MINIMALLY INVASIVE
SINUS SURGERY
Piero Nicolai
2. MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
Critical issues
• Low incidence
• Non-specific presenting
complaints
• High histologic variability
• Treatment options not well
defined
• Difficult comparison of
treatment results
2012
3. EPIDEMIOLOGY
• 1% of all malignant neoplasms
• 3% of all upper respiratory tract malignancies
• 3-5% of head and neck malignant neoplasms
• Origin: 60% maxillary sinus
20-30% nasal cavity
10-15% ethmoid sinus
1% sphenoid and frontal sinus
• The incidence is low in most populations
< 1.5/100000 in men
<1.0/100000 in women
higher rates in Japan and certain parts of China and India
• Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common
2012
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. s of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.
In Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, editors. World Health Organization
Classification of s Pathology & Genetics Head and Neck s. Lyon, France: IARCPress;
2005:10.
8. IMAGING
MSCT and/or MRI
Differentiation between tumor and
inflammatory changes
Soft tissues involvement and bony
infiltration
Perineural spread
PET/CT US of the neck
2012
15. EVOLUTION OF OUR INDICATIONS FOR
ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY
FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO EXPAND THE INDICATIONS OF
ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY
• Increasing expertise
• Technological advances
• Navigation systems
• Haemostatic agents
• Introduction of new reconstructive
techniques
2012
16. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT
SINONASAL TUMORS
SURGICAL OPTIONS
Endonasal endoscopic
resection (EER)
EER with transnasal
craniectomy (ERTC)
Cranio-endoscopic resection
(CER)
2012
17. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT SINONASAL
TUMORS
Contraindications for EER
!!
• Extensive lacrimal pathway involvement
• Involvement of the anterior wall/lateral portion of frontal sinus
• Infiltration of the bony walls of the maxillary sinus (except the
medial)
• Involvement of the hard palate
• Erosion of the nasal bones
• Invasion of the orbital content
• Involvement of the anterior skull base
2012
18. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT
SINONASAL TUMORS
Endoscopic resection with transnasal craniectomy (ERTC):
Indications
• Tumors with a high likelihood of spreading along the
olfactory phyla
• Extensive contact with the anterior skull base (ASB)
• Limited infiltration/resorption of the ASB
• Contact, focal infiltration or growth through the dura of
the ASB
2012
19. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
Cranio-endoscopic resection (CER)
Indications
• Lateral extension of dural resection over the
orbital roof
• Brain involvement
• Encasement of a major vessel (i.e. ICA) or
nerve
2012
20. Two Surgical Teams with the same
Philosophy
P. Castelnuovo P. Nicolai
ENT Dpt. of Varese ENT Dpt. of Brescia
2012
21. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT
SINONASAL TUMORS
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Follow-up until dead or at least 12 months after the
treatment
1996-2010: 326 pts
Mean age=61.3 years (range 4-85), M/F=2.2/1
Mean follow-up=52.7 months (range 12-169)
2012
23. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
T staging (AJCC 2010)
EER
ERTC
CER
Total
(n=139)
(n=126)
(n=61)
(n=326)
T1
57
20
3
80 (24.5%)
T2
35
32
2
69 (21.2%)
T3
18
28
13
59 (18.1%)
T4a
16
14
12
42 (12.9%)
2012
T4b
13
32
31
76 (23.3%)
24. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
NOT A PIECEMEAL RESECTION
BUT TUMOR DISASSEMBLING
2012
25. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
EER/ERTC: multilayer technique
1) Tumor debulking
2) Septal resection
3) Centripetal removal with
subperiosteal resection (Draf
III + median sphenoidotomy)
4) Removal of bone in
contact with the tumor (skull
base, lamina papyracea)
5) Removal of periorbita,
dura, olfactory bulb(s)
2012
6) Duraplasty and skull base
reconstruction
34. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT
SINONASAL TUMORS
STEP 6: Endoscopic duraplasty
Goals of fat tissue:
sealing of
duraplasty and
2012 shock absorber
effect
38. ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION WITH TRANSNASAL
CRANIECTOMY (ERTC)
Analysis of CSF leak (Fisher exact / Pearson Chi-Square test)
Variable (n) CSF-leak rate p values
• Present (76):
9.6 %
Comorbidities • Absent (76): 2.7 %
p =0.08
• Brescia (48):
4.2 %
Institution • Varese (98): 7.1 %
p =0.718
• T1, T2, T3 (99):
6.1 %
Stage • T4 (47): 6.4 %
p =1
Dural involvement • Yes (32)
6.3 %
p =1
(pT4b) • No (114) 6.1 %
• monolateral (60):
3.3 %
Dural defect • bilateral (86): 8.1 %
p =0.308
• primary (111):
6.3 %
Treatment • salvage (35): 5.7 %
p =1
Period of • 1997-2008 (85):
9.4 %
p =0.08
2012 treatment • 2009-2010 (61): 1.6 %
39. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
5-year overall survival (EER-ERTC-CER)
ERTC (82.6±4.34)
EER (79.3±3.81)
CER (49.2±6.6)
p=0.00197
2012 SPSS® for Windows; version
10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank test
40. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
5-year disease-specific survival (EER-ERTC-CER)
EER (86.2±3.26)
ERTC (85.7±4.04)
CER (59.8±6.96)
p=0.00038 SPSS® for Windows; version
2012 10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank test
41. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
5-year disease-specific survival (untreated vs recurrence)
DISEASE SPECIFIC SURVIVAL DEPENDING ON PREVIOUS
TREATMENT
U (82±2.96)
R (75.3±5.55)
p=0.0297 SPSS® for Windows; version
2012 10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank
test
42. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
5-year disease-specific survival (histology)
ONB (100)
MISCELLANEOUS (91.2±4.98)
ADC (82.4±3.95)
CARCINOMA GROUP (77±5.85)
MELANOMA (31.6±10.7)
p=0.00098 SPSS® for Windows; version
2012 10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank
test
43. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
5-year disease-specific survival (T category)
T2 (94.9±3.84)
T2 (94.9±3.84)
T1 (94.1±2.86)
T4a (86.8±6.25)
T3 (69.6±7.36)
T4b (55.8±6.93)
p=0.000203
SPSS® for Windows; version
2012 10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank test
44. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
5-year recurrence-free survival (EER-ERTC-CER)
ERTC (77.9±6.26)
EER (77.1±3.87)
CER (54.7±7.46)
p=0.00101
SPSS® for Windows; version
10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
2012 Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank test
45. ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION WITH
TRANSNASAL CRANIECTOMY (ERTC)
5-year disease-specific survival (histology)
2012 SPSS® for Windows; version
10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank test
46. ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION WITH
TRANSNASAL CRANIECTOMY (ERTC)
5-year disease-specific survival (T category)
2012 SPSS® for Windows; version
10.0.1, 1999 Chicago, IL.
Survival calculated by the
Kaplan-Meiier method.
Univariate comparisons
performed using log-rank test
47. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR
MALIGNANT SINONASAL TUMORS
Standard craniofacial resection
• 1307 patients (International collaborative study)
• Preoperative treatment: 59%
• Most common histotypes: SCC (29%), ADC (16%)
• Postoperative treatment: 39%
• 5-year overall survival: 54%
• 5-year disease-specific survival:
60%
• 5-year recurrence free survival:
53%
2012
Patel, et al. 2003
48. LOCAL FAILURES
72-year-old male
ITAC
Previous external surgery
and RT
pT3 (erosion of cribra)
69-year-old male
Signet ring-cell AC
First treatment
pT3 (erosion of cribra)
2012
49. MENYNGEAL METASTASES
66-year-old male
Signet ring-cell AC
Previous external surgery
pT3 (erosion of cribra)
Postop RT
70-year-old male
ITAC
No previous treatment
pT4b (dura invasion)
Postop RT
2012
50. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT
SINONASAL TUMORS
Conclusions
• Endoscopic surgery for T1-T2 lesions of the naso-ethmoidal
complex offers a local control of the disease comparable to
that obtained with traditional techniques
• The efficacy of endoscopic resection with transnasal
craniectomy in the management of lesions involving the
anterior skull base (bone, dura) requires validation by further
studies with larger cohort of patients and long-term follow up
• Indications for adjuvant radiotherapy need to be refined
• Possible role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
2012
• Need for a multi-institutional database
51. ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR MALIGNANT SINONASAL
TUMORS
Endoscopic surgery for
malignancies of the sinonasal tract
should be performed only in
centers where a multidisciplinary
team with experience in the whole
spectrum of the procedures
involving the anterior skull base is
available, keeping in mind that
there are precise limits related to
the extent as well as to the biology
of the tumor.
2012