RPMS-OPCRF

1. PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per
KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCOREQ E T AVE
INSTRUCTIONAL
LEADERSHIP
Accountedfor learningoutcomes
of schoolsandcentersvis-à-vis
goalsand targets
June 2016 –
March 2017
25% Increasedover allNAT
performancebyat least 2%
from the baselinedata
75%of the learners
achieved80%GSA
Performedinstructional
supervisionto achievelearning
outcomes
June 2016 –
March 2017
Prepared/implementedand
submitted100%Monthly
Supervisory Planand
AccomplishmentReport
Observed 5 teachers(small
school)/7 teachers
(medium school)/10
teachers(bigschool)per
month
Managedtheprocessesand
proceduresinmonitoringstudent
achievement
Every
quarter
Implemented4MPs
trackingsystem in every
gradingperiod
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
SCHOOL
LOGO

2. PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per
KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCOREQ E T AVE
Provided coaching/mentoring to
improveteaching-learning
performance
June 2016 –
March 2017
Conducted
coaching/mentoring
sessionsto 5 teachers
(smallschool)/7teachers
(medium school)/10
teachers(bigschool)per
month
LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT
Provided safe andchildfriendly
learningschoolenvironmentfor
students/ learners
June 2016 –
March 2017
15% 100%accomplishedonthe
following:
ImplementedChild
Protectionmechanismand
processes(DepEdOrder
No. 405, s. 2012)for SY
2016– 2017
ImplementedclearDisaster
Risk Reduction
MobilizationPlan
Maintainedconducive
physicallearning
environmentfor SY 2016 –
2017
Provided facilitiesas
learningsupportsystem for
SY 2016 – 2017
HUMANRESOURCE
MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT
Sustainedthe conductofNCBTS
TSNA, analyzed result and
designed/implemented
May2016 20% ConductedNCBTS-TSNA
andanalyzed 100%results
priorto the start of the
schoolyear

3. PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per
KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCOREQ E T AVE
intervention program toaddress
developmentneedsof personnel.
Organized/conductedIn-Service
training
June 2016 –
March 2017
Conductedtwo(2) In-
ServiceTrainingsto
teachersandnon-teaching
personnelwithinRPMS
cycle
Recommendedandfacilitatedthe
hiring/promotion/ approved
ERF/reclassificationofteachers
andpersonnel
June 2016 –
March 2017
Facilitatedhiring/
promotion/reclassification
of teacher/s
Provide technicalassistanceto
teacherson matters pertainingto
the enhancementofclassroom
management,skillsand
instructionalcompetenceandto
non-teachingpersonnelfor
supportservices withinthe RPMS
cycle
June 2016 –
March 2017
Provided technical
assistanceto 5 teachers
(Sm)/ 7 teachers(M)/10
teachers(B) to enhance
their classroom and
instructionalcompetence
per month.
Attended relevant trainings/
seminars/andworkshopsfor
schoolheads/school
administratorsandsentteachers
to relevant trainings/workshops
for teachers
June 2016 –
March 2017
Attended 75%of the
requiredtraining/seminar/
workshopwithinRPMS
cycle
Sent 75% of teachersto
requiredtrainings/
seminars/workshopswithin
RPMScycle
PARENTS’
INVOLVEMENT AND
COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIP
Establishedschool,family,and
communitypartnershipforschool
performance
June 2016 –
March 2017
15% Conducted2General
Assembly meetingswith
75%parents’ attendance
andto advocateschool

4. PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per
KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCOREQ E T AVE
programsandprojects
withinthe SchoolYear
Generatedresourcesforschool
improvement/facilities/equipment
from stakeholdersanddonors
with inthe schoolyear.
June 2016 –
March 2017
Initiatedone (1) program or
projectalignedwithAIP
from stakeholderswithin
RPMScycle
Awarded andrecognized
benevolentstakeholdersat the
endof the schoolyear
April 2017 Awarded andrecognized
deserving stakeholderson
RecognitionDay
SCHOOL
LEADERSHIP,
MANAGEMENT AND
OPERATIONS
Initiatedand has inplacedSchool
ImprovementPlan developed
collaborativelyby the
stakeholdersof the schoolandthe
community
June 2016 –
March 2017
25% Performeddatabased
strategic planningand
prioritized
programs/projectsthat
appropriatelyaddress
varying needsof school
withinthe calendaryear
Conductedregularreview
of SIP
Organized/implementedclear
structuresand workarrangements
that promotessharedleadership
andgovernanceanddefinesthe
rolesand responsibilitiesofthe
various stakeholders
June 2016 –
March 2017
Organizedfunctional
ProjectTeams/School
WorkingCommittee/swith
clearterm of referencesto
supportimplementationof
programs/projects
Performedschoolleadership,
managementandoperations
functions
June 2016 –
March 2017
Implementedfunctional
leadershipmanagement
andoperationalhumanand
materialresource
mobilizationandutilization

5. PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per
KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCOREQ E T AVE
alignedwithSIP to improve
schoolperformanceina
schoolyear.
100%utilization of MOOE
andtimelysubmissionof
financialreport
OVERALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT
_________________________ ___________________________ ______________________________
Rater Ratee Approving Authority