Presentation by Rehana Rajabali, Toronto and Region Conservation Authorities, at the Delft-FEWS International User Days 2020, during Delft Software Days - Edition 2020. Monday, 9 November 2020.
Introducing Microsoft’s new Enterprise Work Management (EWM) Solution
DSD-INT 2020 Beyond the Forecast - Communicating Flood - Risk in the Toronto Region - Rajabali
1. Beyond the Forecast: Communicating Flood
Risk in the Toronto Region
Rehana Rajabali, P.Eng, MUDS
Associate Director, Engineering Services
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
FEWS User Days – November 2020
5. Prevention and Mitigation
• Floodplain mapping and the engineering
studies that support it
• Hydrology
• Hydraulics
• Flood Risk Assessment
• Land Use Management
• Stormwater Management
• Land-Use and Development
Regulation
• Flood Control Infrastructure
• e.g. G. Ross Lord Dam
• Capital works for flood protection
• e.g. Port Lands Flood Protection
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5
7. Preparedness
• Emergency ManagementPlanning
• Flood ContingencyPlan
• Municipal emergency plans
• IMS structure
• Training
• Flood Duty Officer training
• IMS training
• Partnership with municipalities
• Public Education
• Emergency Preparedness Week
• Flood preparednesscurriculum
partnershipwith Education
• Flood Risk Outreach Strategy
• Floodplaininformation on the web
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 7
8. Flood Response
ConservationAuthorities
- Monitor watershed and weather conditions and operatea flood
forecasting andwarning system
- Issue Flood Messages
- Operate Conservation Authority dams and flood controlstructures
- Providetechnical advice to municipalities
- Maintain communications with municipalities and other agencies
Municipalities
- Notify appropriatemunicipal officials, departments and agencies.
- Determine the appropriateresponseand deploy municipal
resources to protectlife and property.
- If required, declare afloodemergency and implement their
emergency responseplan.
- Request provincial assistance if needed
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 8
10. Where FEWS/Decision Support Systems come in
10
Inputs
•Currentstreamflow /
WL / SWE
•Received
Precipitation
•Forecast
Precipitation
•Radar
•Forecast
Temperature
•Thunderstorm
parameters
Decision
Support
System
•Brings together the
inputs
•Supports the analysis
and the decision
•Documents the
decisions
Outcomes
•Is therea threat of flooding?
•What level messagedo we issue?
•What info do we need to provide
to municipal partners?
•Dam operations (TRCA only has
two dams and they are exclusively
for flood control(reservoirsare
empty until filled by a storm)
Toronto andRegion Conservation Authority
11. Distilling data into key messages
11
Inputs
Decision
Support
System
Outputs
Toronto andRegion Conservation Authority
12. TRCA Flood Message Types
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 12
High flows, unsafe banks, melting ice or other factors that could be
dangerous for recreational users such as anglers, canoeists,hikers,
children, pets, etc. Flooding is not expected.
Early notice of the potential forflooding based on weather forecastscalling
for heavy rain, snow melt, high wind or other conditions that could lead to
high runoff, cause ice jams, lakeshore flooding or erosion.
Flooding is possible inspecific watercoursesor municipalities.
Municipalities, emergencyservices and individual landowners in flood-
prone areas should prepare.
Flooding is imminent or already occurring in specificwatercourses or
municipalities.
A notice that critical high Lake Ontario levels and/or waves are imminent
and/or occurring, which could result in shoreline flooding and/or erosion
13. We can’t change the weather, but we continue to
work towards reducing the threat to public safety
13
Forecasting toolsand systems
reduce this delay time
Figure adaptedfrom D. Mileti - A Guide toPublic Alerts and Warnings for Dam and Levee Emergencies, US ArmyCorps of Engineers
Priming audiences and emergency planning
reduce these delaytimes
14. Risk Communication vs Crisis
Communication*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 14
Crisis
communication
Crisis
Communication
Risk
Communication
*I first came across the conceptof applying Bloom’s Taxonomyto risk communication
in a presentation by Ronda Oberlin, City of Lansing, MI
15. Many people inhabiting
flood-prone communities
are not fully aware of the
risks to themselves and
their property.
Thistlethwaite et. al., 2017
16. …but we have many touchpoints
with these audiences
17. Flood Risk Outreach
Program and Site-
Specific Flood
Response Plans
• Priming our
municipal partner
emergency
management
officials
• Priming members
of the public who
live in flood
vulnerable areas
Toronto andRegion Conservation Authority 17
18. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 18
Risk communication takes many forms
26. For the sophisticated user, share the data,
exchange the data
Toronto andRegion Conservation Authority 26
trcagauging.ca
27. Parting
thoughts –
what we are
working on
now..
• Warning messages and pro-active
communication with audiences should
reference a shared
vocabulary/understanding – has that
been established?
• Consider the outputs you need for your
(various) flood warning audiences to
include in your decision support system
(FEWS) workflows
• While warning messages may be one-
directional, how can public feedback be
incorporated into situational awareness
tools?
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
27