SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 13
David Malakian



       Aristotle




On Rhetorical Approach
• Aristotle was a philosopher and was a student of Plato
• Aristotle's philosophy of argument is embodied in his
  Rhetorical Approach.
• Aristotle's book THE RHETORIC is generally considered the
  most important single work in the literature of the speech
  discipline.
• The Rhetorical approach may be described as
  a process for discovering all of the available
  means of artistic persuasion on any subject.
Aristotle believed that through the use of the rhetorical process:

• Truth and justice may be guarded against falsehood and
  wrong.
• Debate may be conducted on subjects in the absence of
  absolute truth.
• Both sides of a claim may be presented.
• Proof to establish the probability of a position may be
  developed.
• Aristotle's persuasion involves the use of three
  elements of proof
Logos
• Means logic and is the use of reason to
  support a decision. Logical appeals essentially
  present the situation, the alternatives, and the
  set of probabilities involved in the decision
  making process. Such appeals are direct to our
  minds reasoning capabilities.

                                Think logically
Pathos
• Means emotion and is the appropriate use if
  emotional and motivational appeals to
  support a decision. Emotional appeals are
  directed to the wishes, wants, desires, goals
  , and needs of the person whose acceptance is
  desired. Such appeals are directed to the
  heart. A good arguer limits the role emotion
  plays in argument.
Ethos
• Refers to the use of source credibility to
  support a conclusion. Aristotle perceived
  ethos as a powerful proof supplied by the
  source himself, and through which judgments
  could be made about his character, wisdom,
  and goodwill.
• Aristotle wrote " persuasion is achieved by the
  speakers personal character where the speech
  is so spoken as to make us think him credible.
  We believe good men more fully and more
  readily than others; this is true generally
  whatever the question is, and absolutely true
  where exact certainty is impossible and
  opinions are divided. this kind of
  persuasion, like the others, should be achieved
  by what the speaker says, not by what people
  think of his character before he begins to
  speak."
• Ethos is thus the image of the source held In
  the minds of the audience. Source credibility
  can be developed in two ways.
• Initial Ethos
• Derived ethos
Initial Ethos
• Initial Ethos: is Based on the arguers credentials, status,
  reputation as known to the audience before they hear or read
  the content of the message.
• Hint: Advertisers have increasingly turned to "positive image
  makers" to sell their clients products. The idea is if you like
  them, you will be favorably disposed toward the product they
  are endorsing.
Derived Ethos
• Derived ethos: this type of ethos results from what is said in
  the message- the quality of the logos and pathos used to get
  the arguments accepted. This approach works best when the
  credibility of the sender is unknown to the audience at the
  outset of the speaker’s presentation.
Conclusion
• Aminimal level of positive ethos is necessary for
  logical and emotional proofs to achieve
  effectiveness. Low credibility sources cannot use high
  levels of emotional appeals effectively, because the
  audience doesn’t believe in the source in the first
  place. Like wise, lacking a certain minima
  ethos, logical proof will be ignored, because the
  source is not perceived as a person who is
  trustworthy.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)
Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)
Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)Jamie Bisset
 
Evaluating Sources Using CARS
Evaluating Sources Using CARSEvaluating Sources Using CARS
Evaluating Sources Using CARSConestogaLRC
 
Paper 3 hl extension
Paper 3 hl extensionPaper 3 hl extension
Paper 3 hl extensionphilipapeters
 
Single factor theory
Single factor theorySingle factor theory
Single factor theoryRustamAli44
 

Mais procurados (6)

Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)
Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)
Critical Evaluation: Critical Reading and Critical Thinking (web version)
 
Evaluating Sources Using CARS
Evaluating Sources Using CARSEvaluating Sources Using CARS
Evaluating Sources Using CARS
 
Paper 3 hl extension
Paper 3 hl extensionPaper 3 hl extension
Paper 3 hl extension
 
Evaluating an argument
Evaluating an argumentEvaluating an argument
Evaluating an argument
 
Informational Text
Informational TextInformational Text
Informational Text
 
Single factor theory
Single factor theorySingle factor theory
Single factor theory
 

Destaque

Teleological Argument
Teleological ArgumentTeleological Argument
Teleological Argumentmrhartley
 
Moral Argument - Freud's View
Moral Argument - Freud's ViewMoral Argument - Freud's View
Moral Argument - Freud's Viewmrhartley
 
Philosophy
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Philosophytmorley
 
Developing critical thinking
Developing critical thinkingDeveloping critical thinking
Developing critical thinkingKristy Lundstrom
 
MUC295 LEC4 Promotional Planning
MUC295 LEC4 Promotional PlanningMUC295 LEC4 Promotional Planning
MUC295 LEC4 Promotional PlanningMUC295
 
Laughs For Wisdom
Laughs For WisdomLaughs For Wisdom
Laughs For WisdomOH TEIK BIN
 
Making the Case for Promotional Planning
Making the Case for Promotional PlanningMaking the Case for Promotional Planning
Making the Case for Promotional PlanningMark Krebs
 
Promotional Mix
Promotional MixPromotional Mix
Promotional Mixpilgrry
 
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Deductive and Inductive ArgumentsDeductive and Inductive Arguments
Deductive and Inductive ArgumentsJanet Stemwedel
 
1.2 Recognizing Arguments
1.2   Recognizing Arguments1.2   Recognizing Arguments
1.2 Recognizing ArgumentsNicholas Lykins
 
Collaborative and cooperative learning
Collaborative and cooperative learningCollaborative and cooperative learning
Collaborative and cooperative learningMaryan Lopez
 
brandshare: how brands & people create value exchange
brandshare: how brands & people create value exchangebrandshare: how brands & people create value exchange
brandshare: how brands & people create value exchangeEdelman
 
Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World
Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World
Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World David Armano
 
A Well Structured Essay
A Well Structured EssayA Well Structured Essay
A Well Structured Essaywsymes
 
CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENTCLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENTmonirba2014
 
Cooperative collaborative
Cooperative collaborativeCooperative collaborative
Cooperative collaborativeSikiu
 

Destaque (20)

Teleological Argument
Teleological ArgumentTeleological Argument
Teleological Argument
 
Moral Argument - Freud's View
Moral Argument - Freud's ViewMoral Argument - Freud's View
Moral Argument - Freud's View
 
Week0214 18
Week0214 18Week0214 18
Week0214 18
 
Philosophy
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Philosophy
 
Developing critical thinking
Developing critical thinkingDeveloping critical thinking
Developing critical thinking
 
MUC295 LEC4 Promotional Planning
MUC295 LEC4 Promotional PlanningMUC295 LEC4 Promotional Planning
MUC295 LEC4 Promotional Planning
 
Laughs For Wisdom
Laughs For WisdomLaughs For Wisdom
Laughs For Wisdom
 
Making the Case for Promotional Planning
Making the Case for Promotional PlanningMaking the Case for Promotional Planning
Making the Case for Promotional Planning
 
Promotional Mix
Promotional MixPromotional Mix
Promotional Mix
 
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Deductive and Inductive ArgumentsDeductive and Inductive Arguments
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
 
Lecture 2 2nd sem PHILOSOPHY
Lecture 2 2nd sem PHILOSOPHYLecture 2 2nd sem PHILOSOPHY
Lecture 2 2nd sem PHILOSOPHY
 
1.2 Recognizing Arguments
1.2   Recognizing Arguments1.2   Recognizing Arguments
1.2 Recognizing Arguments
 
Collaborative and cooperative learning
Collaborative and cooperative learningCollaborative and cooperative learning
Collaborative and cooperative learning
 
brandshare: how brands & people create value exchange
brandshare: how brands & people create value exchangebrandshare: how brands & people create value exchange
brandshare: how brands & people create value exchange
 
Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World
Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World
Responsive Marketing in a Real Time World
 
Collaborative Versus Cooperative Learning
Collaborative Versus Cooperative LearningCollaborative Versus Cooperative Learning
Collaborative Versus Cooperative Learning
 
A Well Structured Essay
A Well Structured EssayA Well Structured Essay
A Well Structured Essay
 
CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENTCLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENT
 
Cooperative collaborative
Cooperative collaborativeCooperative collaborative
Cooperative collaborative
 
Promotion
PromotionPromotion
Promotion
 

Semelhante a Aristotle

persuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptx
persuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptxpersuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptx
persuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptxMAdnanAziz
 
A Short Introduction to Rhetoric
A Short Introduction to RhetoricA Short Introduction to Rhetoric
A Short Introduction to RhetoricMert Dalgic
 
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical Appeals
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical AppealsWeek 1 LIB440 Rhetorical Appeals
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical AppealsDr. Russell Rodrigo
 
The art of speechwriting
The art of speechwritingThe art of speechwriting
The art of speechwritingBerta Portillo
 
1_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
1_Doing_Philosophy.pptx1_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
1_Doing_Philosophy.pptxMeiAihara14
 
class - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptxclass - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptxnireekshan1
 
Answer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdf
Answer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdfAnswer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdf
Answer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdfshalini518936
 
Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...
Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...
Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...gibson2874
 
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptxAlfredoQuijana2
 
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptxMeiAihara14
 
Rhetorical Appeal
Rhetorical AppealRhetorical Appeal
Rhetorical AppealDenise Hall
 

Semelhante a Aristotle (20)

Ethos pathos logos
Ethos pathos logosEthos pathos logos
Ethos pathos logos
 
persuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptx
persuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptxpersuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptx
persuasive Speaking presentation for English.pptx
 
A Short Introduction to Rhetoric
A Short Introduction to RhetoricA Short Introduction to Rhetoric
A Short Introduction to Rhetoric
 
Bradley 2013 ethos pathos logos
Bradley 2013 ethos pathos logosBradley 2013 ethos pathos logos
Bradley 2013 ethos pathos logos
 
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical Appeals
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical AppealsWeek 1 LIB440 Rhetorical Appeals
Week 1 LIB440 Rhetorical Appeals
 
I_ntroduction_to_Philosophy1.pptx
I_ntroduction_to_Philosophy1.pptxI_ntroduction_to_Philosophy1.pptx
I_ntroduction_to_Philosophy1.pptx
 
Week 1 rhetorical appeals
Week 1 rhetorical appealsWeek 1 rhetorical appeals
Week 1 rhetorical appeals
 
Philosophy.pptx
Philosophy.pptxPhilosophy.pptx
Philosophy.pptx
 
The art of speechwriting
The art of speechwritingThe art of speechwriting
The art of speechwriting
 
Persuading others
Persuading othersPersuading others
Persuading others
 
1_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
1_Doing_Philosophy.pptx1_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
1_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
 
Doing_Philosophy.pptx
Doing_Philosophy.pptxDoing_Philosophy.pptx
Doing_Philosophy.pptx
 
class - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptxclass - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptx
 
Answer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdf
Answer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdfAnswer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdf
Answer the following question in complete sentences. Minimum 1 page .pdf
 
Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...
Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...
Critical Thinking & Greek Civilization (Extra Credit)- Speech 104 - Allen Ara...
 
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
 
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
2_Ways_of_Doing_Philosophy.pptx
 
Research philosophy
Research philosophyResearch philosophy
Research philosophy
 
Rhetorical Appeal
Rhetorical AppealRhetorical Appeal
Rhetorical Appeal
 
Ethos
EthosEthos
Ethos
 

Aristotle

  • 1. David Malakian Aristotle On Rhetorical Approach
  • 2. • Aristotle was a philosopher and was a student of Plato • Aristotle's philosophy of argument is embodied in his Rhetorical Approach. • Aristotle's book THE RHETORIC is generally considered the most important single work in the literature of the speech discipline.
  • 3. • The Rhetorical approach may be described as a process for discovering all of the available means of artistic persuasion on any subject.
  • 4. Aristotle believed that through the use of the rhetorical process: • Truth and justice may be guarded against falsehood and wrong. • Debate may be conducted on subjects in the absence of absolute truth. • Both sides of a claim may be presented. • Proof to establish the probability of a position may be developed.
  • 5. • Aristotle's persuasion involves the use of three elements of proof
  • 6. Logos • Means logic and is the use of reason to support a decision. Logical appeals essentially present the situation, the alternatives, and the set of probabilities involved in the decision making process. Such appeals are direct to our minds reasoning capabilities. Think logically
  • 7. Pathos • Means emotion and is the appropriate use if emotional and motivational appeals to support a decision. Emotional appeals are directed to the wishes, wants, desires, goals , and needs of the person whose acceptance is desired. Such appeals are directed to the heart. A good arguer limits the role emotion plays in argument.
  • 8. Ethos • Refers to the use of source credibility to support a conclusion. Aristotle perceived ethos as a powerful proof supplied by the source himself, and through which judgments could be made about his character, wisdom, and goodwill.
  • 9. • Aristotle wrote " persuasion is achieved by the speakers personal character where the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible. We believe good men more fully and more readily than others; this is true generally whatever the question is, and absolutely true where exact certainty is impossible and opinions are divided. this kind of persuasion, like the others, should be achieved by what the speaker says, not by what people think of his character before he begins to speak."
  • 10. • Ethos is thus the image of the source held In the minds of the audience. Source credibility can be developed in two ways. • Initial Ethos • Derived ethos
  • 11. Initial Ethos • Initial Ethos: is Based on the arguers credentials, status, reputation as known to the audience before they hear or read the content of the message. • Hint: Advertisers have increasingly turned to "positive image makers" to sell their clients products. The idea is if you like them, you will be favorably disposed toward the product they are endorsing.
  • 12. Derived Ethos • Derived ethos: this type of ethos results from what is said in the message- the quality of the logos and pathos used to get the arguments accepted. This approach works best when the credibility of the sender is unknown to the audience at the outset of the speaker’s presentation.
  • 13. Conclusion • Aminimal level of positive ethos is necessary for logical and emotional proofs to achieve effectiveness. Low credibility sources cannot use high levels of emotional appeals effectively, because the audience doesn’t believe in the source in the first place. Like wise, lacking a certain minima ethos, logical proof will be ignored, because the source is not perceived as a person who is trustworthy.