This document provides information on additional services offered by Crossref for its members, including content registration, similarity checking, Crossmark, funding data, and cited-by links. It highlights improvements made to services like a refreshed interface, larger file sizes accepted, and faster report generation. Publishers are encouraged to deposit accurate funding data to make research outcomes searchable and help funders track published results. Cited-by links provide a way for publishers to display who has cited a work and for readers to find related research.

2. Additional
Services for
Crossref Members

3. Let’s look at
participation from our
Korean members

4. Content registration by Sponsoring Affiliate

6. Publisher member participation

8. An example of license information
• Computer readable
• Can deposit a .csv file to easily add this to older
records

10. Specific services

11. Growth of Similarity Check

12. What’s new?
• Document to document comparison (available
through native interface)

14. Other improvements
• Refreshed look and feel
• modern interface
• more readable font and friendlier styling
• Report mode memory
• takes users back to the mode they last used
• Improved submission process
• File size up to 100MB
• PPT and XLSS now included

15. 2016 changes
• Download user list
• Similarity score calculation update
• Improved security
• Faster report generation
• New content intake system
https://www.crossref.org/blog/now-put-your-hands-
up-for-a-similarity-check-update/

16. Crossmark: what is it?
• A button and a set of metadata that informs readers
about
• Publication status (current, updated, retracted)
• Funding information
• Authors’ ORCIDs
• Publication history
• Rights or licensing information
• And much more…

26. What constitutes a status update?
A change significant enough to affect the
crediting or interpretation of the work

27. Status update types
• addendum
• clarification
• correction
• corrigendum
• erratum
• expression_of_concern
• new_edition
• new_version
• partial_retraction
• removal
• retraction
• withdrawal

28. Information made available for re-use

31. Latest numbers
4.5 million Crossmark deposits
• 380 publishers
• 44,000 status updates
• 1,500 retractions
• 41,000 corrections
• 2.5 million DOIs with additional metadata

35. Funding data and the open funder registry
A standard way of reporting funding sources for
published scholarly research

36. Who funded the research?

37. Crossref funding data
• Standardisation of funder names using the funder registry
• Publisher deposit of funding metadata
• Large-scale analysis and reporting to funders

39. https://search.crossref.org/funding
Searchable metadata:

46. http://api.crossref.org

48. This is your metadata
• Deposit funding data with us so that funders can locate
and record published outcomes
• Deposit good quality funding data - funder names
without funder IDs are invisible
• Give authors clear instructions and guidance on citing
funders correctly
• Full funder name not project acronym
• Include grant numbers

49. In summary
• Crossref’s database is the only central source of
standardised funding acknowledgement metadata
from publications
• Accuracy of funding metadata is critical
• An increasing number of organizations and projects
rely on this funding data to identify content and
check compliance with funder policies
• Get involved and make the funding data from your
publications available, accurate and transparent

50. `
Cited-by provides a clear overview of
the publications that have cited a piece
of content - and allows the publisher to
display this information on their
website.

55. Getting started
• Deposit your references

56. Participate in Cited-by
• Let others see who you are citing
• Find out who is citing your papers
• Display that information however you like
• Help your readers find other related research

57. Crossref can see over
649,066,998 Cited-by
links

58. Crossref metadata helps
content be identified,
discovered and used

59. Thank you!
Questions?