Pierre de Villiers from AOSIS talks about their experience in using Crossref including the Similarity Check and Cited-By services. Presented at Crossref LIVE Cape Town, 19th April 2018.
6. DHET List – Publishers
NUMBER OF JOURNALS
28
25
11
10
9
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
AOSIS Unisa Press Routledge/ Taylor
& Francis
NISC Juta HMPG
n=90/277 or 33%)
10. • Member of Crossref since January 2009 [in 10th year]
• Services currently utilised:
– Similarity check (Crosscheck) - compare the text of
submitted manuscripts for similarity
– Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) - for current and all
back articles
– Reference linking for all current journal content
– Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) - participant
– Cited-by: knowing who cited articles
Crossref Services
14. • The DOI is a persistent identifier. A link that don’t break and will
always lead readers (researchers) to the content they’re looking
for
• Counting of citations for measuring impact of articles
• Link with ORCID – updating author records
Essentially, research travels beyond the journal/publishers
publication platform as everyone links their references.
Advantages ForAOSIS
15. • Research dissemination and visibility. Included DOI in
referencing schema (replaced page numbers)
• Maintain and update metadata long-term, even if content moves
to a new website.
• DOI reports – most used articles, resolving conflicts
Content is found, cited, linked to, included in assessment, and used
by other researchers.
Advantages ForAOSIS
18. A technical capability has to be maintained for:
– Solving DOI resolution conflicts
– Updating DOIs with journal platform change/move
– Implementing new DOI guidelines, such as ORCID, http vs https;
dx.doi.org vs doi.org
– Resolving OJS and Crossref communication issues
– Implementing new services, e.g. Crossmark, Funding
Crossref provides thorough technical documentation and assistance.
Challenges @AOSIS