Do’s and don’ts in Corporate Innovation
by Vartan Minasyan, Head of Investment & Innovation @Kaspersky Lab
Corporations and innovation managers are being surrounded by many tools, ecosystem partners and consultants. We will share where you can rely on your connections and outsource some work and what you better do yourself, based on Kaspersky experience.
7. Kaspersky Lab | The Power of Protection7
Innovation process components
Purpose People
Projects Products
8. Kaspersky Lab | The Power of Protection8
PURPOSE (of investment)
YES:
1. Define the purpose of investment before building the projects funnel
2. Carefully understand your stakeholders and their goals (Sales vs R&D vs
Strategy vs BusDev)
3. Understand exit strategies before starting a project
NO:
1. Define (change) investment purpose and exit strategies after project start
2. Push project to exit during before revenue (too early) or during revenue
growth (too late)
9. Kaspersky Lab | The Power of Protection9
PEOPLE
YES:
1. Personality: E-type for the project leader (hungry for changes, fail-resistant,
expertise-driven)
2. Compensation: small salary + large bonus + profit sharing
3. Management: maximum freedom (yet still legal) with maximum
responsibility, minimal reporting
NO:
1. Start the project without a leader or with a person of corporate responsibility
type
2. Keep the previous compensation scheme, linear increase
3. Push decisions down and create corporate responsibility process
10. Kaspersky Lab | The Power of Protection10
PROCESS (of execution)
YES:
1. Structure new projects in a separate entity or at the level closer to top
2. Turn management into project stakeholders
3. Set very strict goals, preferably in OKR form, not MBO
NO:
1. Bureaucracy kills innovation (need to isolate from core business)
2. Change goals and budget during execution
11. Kaspersky Lab | The Power of Protection11
PRODUCT
YES:
1. Hi-tech products that are harder to repeat (high barriers for competition)
2. Best target market: intersection of key expertise with 1-2 NEW markets
3. Single solution product yet easy to expand to next market segments
NO:
1. Single-geo products
2. Cool technology but low value, complex business models, unverified
hypothesis
3. Beginning of the market/technology hype