O SlideShare utiliza cookies para otimizar a funcionalidade e o desempenho do site, assim como para apresentar publicidade mais relevante aos nossos usuários. Se você continuar a navegar o site, você aceita o uso de cookies. Leia nosso Contrato do Usuário e nossa Política de Privacidade.
O SlideShare utiliza cookies para otimizar a funcionalidade e o desempenho do site, assim como para apresentar publicidade mais relevante aos nossos usuários. Se você continuar a utilizar o site, você aceita o uso de cookies. Leia nossa Política de Privacidade e nosso Contrato do Usuário para obter mais detalhes.
After almost 30 years . . . has framework evolved with industry?
“cream skimming,”“cherry picking,”
TRC = Total Resource CostPAC = Program Administrator Cost
OPIs = Other Program Impacts
Aesp webinar pat_stanton_csg
AESP Webinar Screening Energy Efficiency: Best Practices CSG LIPA Program• Click to edit Master text styles Residential Retrofit Perspective – Second level • Third level Pat Stanton, SVP Policy & Advocacy – Fourth level Conservation Services Group » Fifth level November 8, 2012
Framework / EvolutionOriginal Task: CSG LIPA Program• Set priorities for allocation of very limited resources • Click to edit Master text styles committed to energy efficiency – Second levelCurrent• Tasks: Third level – Fourth level• Identify all cost effective efficiency measures » Fifth level• Promote energy efficiency as “first fuel”• Mitigate risk, hedge against price volatility
Cost of Getting to the Door• Current framework in CSG LIPA Program residential sector encourages • Click to edit fruit” programs “low hanging Master text styles• Creates lost opportunities – Second level• Inefficient use of program overhead: • Third level homeowners not “buying” maximum energy – Fourth level efficiency during their (likely) single event » Fifth level shopping experience
Discount Rate Projected Utility Generation Resources in 2015 Relative Cost and Relative Risk CSG LIPA Program • Click to edit Master text styles – Second level • Third level – Fourth level » Fifth levelSource: CERES
Measure/Program/Portfolio• Homes: many components – Lighting CSG LIPA Program – Electronics • Click to edit Master text styles – HVAC – Second level – Building shell • • Third level insulation – Fourth • air sealing level » Fifth level • windows• Measure level application of Cost Effectiveness creates extreme – lost opportunities
TRC: “Jack of all trades, master of none”• TRC performed without full consideration of CSG inconsistent, undervalues EE OPIs is internally LIPA Program• • Click to edit Master text to do TRC correctly Is it worth the extra costs styles in allSecond level – cases? • Third level• PAC test requires much less data – a lower – Fourth level cost alternativelevel » Fifth
Food for Thought• Should we use the lower cost PAC test as a CSG Any program that passes screening test? – LIPA Program • Clickgreen light gets a to edit Master text styles• Reserve fulllevel test, including valuation of – Second TRC OPIs, •only for programs with significant non- Third level – energy regulatedFourth level benefits (i.e., low income » Fifth level programs or programs that create significant non-regulated energy savings)
Thank you! CSG LIPA Program• Click to edit Master text styles – Second level Pat Stanton • Third level email@example.com – Fourth level 508.365.3297 » Fifth level www.csgrp.com