2. ž Introduction to Metastatic Breast Cancer
1. How does this cancer spread?
2. Symptoms
3. Treatment Options
4. Current Study Methods
ž Origin of Synthesis
1. Contributing Papers
2. Our Research Proposal
ž Methods and Expectations
3. ž Classified as Stage 4 Cancer
ž The cancer originates in the breast but is
capable of moving to various parts of the
body such as
1. Lungs
2. Liver
3. Bones
4. Brain
ž Creates complications in those regions
4. ž Brain
1. Head aches
2. Vision disturbances
3. Seizures
4. Behavioral/
Personality changes
ž Bone
1. Increased pain
2. Weaker and more
fracture prone
ž Liver
1. Increased digestive
enzymes
2. pH imbalance
3. Itchy skin
4. Nausea and
vomiting
ž Lung
1. Chest Pain
2. Trouble Breathing
5. ž Utilize circulatory
and lymphatic system
to travel to different
organs.
ž Cells growing at an
abnormal rate are
capable of invading
surrounding healthy
tissues and
spreading.
6. 1. Invasion of normal healthy
tissue
2. Intravasation – entering through
walls of circulatory and lymph
system.
3. Transport/Circulation – use
circulatory and lymph system to
travel.
4. Arrest and Extravasation –
cancer cells stop and move
outward towards tissues.
5. Growth – can form smaller
tumors known as
micrometastases
6. Angiogenesis – harness linkage
to new blood vessels to promote
growth
7. ž HER2 targeted therapy– Human Epidermal
Growth Factor – drugs to decrease expression
of this factor. (Herceptin)
ž Radiation Therapy
ž Surgical removal of tumorous regions
ž Endocrine Therapy: Drugs that target
hormone receptors and control levels of
progesterone and estrogen. (Aromatase
Inhibitors).
8. 1. “Selective Events in the Metastatic
Process Defined by Analysis of the
Sequential Dissemination of
Subpopulations of a Mouse Mammary
Tumor”
2. “TWIST, a master regulator of
morphogenesis, plays an important role in
Tumor Metastasis”
3. “Regulation of the expression of E-
Cadherin on Human Cancer Cells by
Linolenic Acid (GLA)”
9. ž In our mouse model, we wish to study the
selective events of metastasis, the effect of
TWIST in breast cancer metastasis along with
potential therapeutic effects of Linolenic
Acid (GLA) that regulate E-cadherin.
10. ž MMTV-PyMT: Commonly used mouse model
for metastatic breast cancer where a mouse
mammary tumor virus is used to induce
cancer.
ž Genetically Altered Mice: (Knockout Mice)
11. ž Our cell line has to be first be established as
a working cell line by growing it in culture.
ž Media content:
1. DMEM
2. 5% Fetal Calf Serum and 5% Newborn Calf
Serum
3. NEAA
4. 2 mM L-glutamine
5. Streptomycin
12. ž Strain: BALB/c Mice
ž Injection of a known titer of viable cancer
cells into the fat pat of the mouse model.
ž Injected into the Fat Pad
14. ž Metastatic process is a sequence of steps
(invasion, intravasation, transport, arrest,
extravasation, and growth).
ž Inefficient.
ž Both random and selective events are
responsible for this inefficiency.
ž Selective:
-cells isolated from spontaneous metastases more
metastatic than original parent tumor.
-genetically stable metastatic and nonmetastatic
sublines have been characterized.
¡ nonmetastatic lines unable to complete one or
more steps in the metastatic cascade, whereas
metastatic lines can complete all steps involved.
15. ž random events eliminate majority of tumor cells,
irrespective of metastatic potential
¡ if any population of cancer cells entering the metastatic
cascade goes sequentially through five randomly
traumatic steps associated with invasion, etc, each of
which kills 90% of the cells, then only 0.001% of the
initial cellular input from the primary cancer will form
metastases.
ž one can define any step that more efficiently
(additional log kill, 2 selective steps would decrease
100-fold) eliminates cells of nonmetastatic lines than
metastatic lines as a selective step.
ž If host immune functions are important for the
elimination of potentially metastatic cells, the
selective events best targets for therapeutic
intervention.
16. ž Knowledge of which steps in the metastatic
cascade are selective is limited. Deficiencies
in quantitatively analyze clonogenicity of
potentially metastatic cells at various points
in the metastatic cascade.
17. ž Bioassays used to estimate # of tumor cells,
but insensitive and not quantitative.
¡ Require multiple animals to test in 1 tumor-
bearing animal.
ž Suzuki. Enzymatically dissociated lungs with
protease, plated the cell onto irradiated
feeder layers. Colonies counted.
ž Background lawn made it impossible.
18. ž Use tumor cells with drug-resistance
markers, simultaneously quantitate and
identify tumor cell colonies developing in the
presence of selective media.
19. ž Tumor subpopulation lines 66, 67, 168, and 410.4 isolated
from a single spontaneously arising mammary tumor from a
BALB/cfC3H mouse.
¡ 66cl4 a thioguanine-, ouabain-resistant variant of line 66.
¡ 168FARN a diamino-purine, geneticin-resistant variant clone of
line 168, transfecting plasmid containing neomycin resistance
gene into 168FAR.
¡ 67NR: transfecting line 67, geneticin-resistant.
¡ 4TO7: thioguanine-, ouabain-resistant variant of 410.4.
¡ 4T1 thioguanine-resistant variant selected from 410.4 without
mutagen treatment.
ž 4T1 spontaneously metastasizes to both lung and liver
(formation of visible nodules in these organs)
ž 66cl4 spontaneously metastasizes to lung.
ž 67NR, 168FARN, 4TO7 highly tumorigenic but rarely
metastasize spontaneously.
ž Tumor cells injected into mammary fatpad.
22. SELECTIVE STEPS OF METASTASIS
coJ
<fLU0oO
io*0§^^.0
IOi:oIIA.
67NR_i/vi
i 'i iiZ
IO 3050<
.»«.»..a iiUJ
1 i i !
B. 168FARN
io2
IO1
,Ãil
u
ioV
I01
Kf
C. 4TO7
V
IO
.«.,.f 30
t
so IO 30
•¿ rmt
DAYS POST INJECTION
Fig. 2. Recovery of clonogenic tumor cells from mice bearing nonmetastatic primary tumors. A, mice were given injections of 1 x 10* 67NR tumor cells in the
mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs removed. B, mice were given injections of 1 x 10*
I68FARN tumor cells in the mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs were removed. The
draining lymph node in the mammary fatpad was removed through day 21, after which the size of primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The
draining brachial lymph nodes were collected throughout the experiment except on day 50. C, mice were given injections of 1 x IO54TO7 tumor cells in the mammary
fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes, lungs, and livers removed. The draining lymph node in the mammary
fatpad was removed through day 19, after which the size of the primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The draining brachial lymph nodes were
collected throughout the experiment. The tissues were processed as detailed in "Materials and Methods." The data were expressed as geometric means for each tissue.
The symbols indicate which tissues were sampled and the day on which sampling was done: .. all tissues for that day; *, blood and lymph nodes only.
of the primary 67NR tumors at the time of necropsy (6.6 ±1.5
g and 11.2 ±4.6 g in the 2 experiments) far exceeded the size
of either 66cl4 (2.6 ±0.3 g and 2.3 ±0.8 g at necropsy) or 4T1
(1.9 ±0.2 g and 1.7 ±0.5 g at necropsy) primary tumors, when
metastatic nodules were detectable in animals with the latter 2
tumor lines.
The nonmetastatic line 168FARN cells spread through the
lymphatics, since clonogenic cells were recovered from draining
lymph nodes in the mammary gland (Fig. 2H). In a second
100
80
LEGEND:
4TO7 ' •¿
66cl4 ' »
4T1 * *
67NR «• »
IMFARN 0--0
ž The nonmetastatic line
67NR appear unable to
intravasate.
ž Clonogenic cells not
recovered from any
(blood, lymph nodes,
lungs, liver) samples
(only 3 from a draining
lymph node on day 7).
ž None of the necropsied
mice hand visible
metastasis.
ž Size of primary tumor
bigger than 66cl$ or
4T1.
23. SELECTIVE STEPS OF METASTASIS
coJ
<fLU0oO
io*0§^^.0
IOi:oIIA.
67NR_i/vi
i 'i iiZ
IO 3050<
.»«.»..a iiUJ
1 i i !
B. 168FARN
io2
IO1
,Ãil
u
ioV
I01
Kf
C. 4TO7
V
IO
.«.,.f 30
t
so IO 30
•¿ rmt
DAYS POST INJECTION
Fig. 2. Recovery of clonogenic tumor cells from mice bearing nonmetastatic primary tumors. A, mice were given injections of 1 x 10* 67NR tumor cells in the
mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs removed. B, mice were given injections of 1 x 10*
I68FARN tumor cells in the mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs were removed. The
draining lymph node in the mammary fatpad was removed through day 21, after which the size of primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The
draining brachial lymph nodes were collected throughout the experiment except on day 50. C, mice were given injections of 1 x IO54TO7 tumor cells in the mammary
fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes, lungs, and livers removed. The draining lymph node in the mammary
fatpad was removed through day 19, after which the size of the primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The draining brachial lymph nodes were
collected throughout the experiment. The tissues were processed as detailed in "Materials and Methods." The data were expressed as geometric means for each tissue.
The symbols indicate which tissues were sampled and the day on which sampling was done: .. all tissues for that day; *, blood and lymph nodes only.
of the primary 67NR tumors at the time of necropsy (6.6 ±1.5
g and 11.2 ±4.6 g in the 2 experiments) far exceeded the size
of either 66cl4 (2.6 ±0.3 g and 2.3 ±0.8 g at necropsy) or 4T1
(1.9 ±0.2 g and 1.7 ±0.5 g at necropsy) primary tumors, when
metastatic nodules were detectable in animals with the latter 2
tumor lines.
The nonmetastatic line 168FARN cells spread through the
lymphatics, since clonogenic cells were recovered from draining
lymph nodes in the mammary gland (Fig. 2H). In a second
100
80
LEGEND:
4TO7 ' •¿
66cl4 ' »
4T1 * *
67NR «• »
IMFARN 0--0
ž Line 168FARN spread
through lymphatics.
(clonogenic cells
recovered from
draining lymph
nodes).
ž No clonogenic cells
recovered in blood.
ž No visible nodules in
lungs.
ž Large primary tumors.
SELECTIVE STEPS OF METASTASIS
coJ
<fLU0oO
io*0§^^.0
IOi:oIIA.
67NR_i/vi
i 'i iiZ
IO 3050<
.»«.»..a iiUJ
1 i i !
B. 168FARN
io2
IO1
,Ãil
u
ioV
I01
Kf
C. 4TO7
V
IO
.«.,.f 30
t
so IO 30
•¿ rmt
DAYS POST INJECTION
Fig. 2. Recovery of clonogenic tumor cells from mice bearing nonmetastatic primary tumors. A, mice were given injections of 1 x 10* 67NR tumor cells in the
mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs removed. B, mice were given injections of 1 x 10*
I68FARN tumor cells in the mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs were removed. The
draining lymph node in the mammary fatpad was removed through day 21, after which the size of primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The
draining brachial lymph nodes were collected throughout the experiment except on day 50. C, mice were given injections of 1 x IO54TO7 tumor cells in the mammary
fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes, lungs, and livers removed. The draining lymph node in the mammary
fatpad was removed through day 19, after which the size of the primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The draining brachial lymph nodes were
collected throughout the experiment. The tissues were processed as detailed in "Materials and Methods." The data were expressed as geometric means for each tissue.
The symbols indicate which tissues were sampled and the day on which sampling was done: .. all tissues for that day; *, blood and lymph nodes only.
of the primary 67NR tumors at the time of necropsy (6.6 ±1.5
g and 11.2 ±4.6 g in the 2 experiments) far exceeded the size
of either 66cl4 (2.6 ±0.3 g and 2.3 ±0.8 g at necropsy) or 4T1
(1.9 ±0.2 g and 1.7 ±0.5 g at necropsy) primary tumors, when
metastatic nodules were detectable in animals with the latter 2
tumor lines.
The nonmetastatic line 168FARN cells spread through the
lymphatics, since clonogenic cells were recovered from draining
100
80
LEGEND:
4TO7 ' •¿
66cl4 ' »
4T1 * *
67NR «• »
IMFARN 0--0
24. SELECTIVE STEPS OF METASTASIS
coJ
<fLU0oO
io*0§^^.0
IOi:oIIA.
67NR_i/vi
i 'i iiZ
IO 3050<
.»«.»..a iiUJ
1 i i !
B. 168FARN
io2
IO1
,Ãil
u
ioV
I01
Kf
C. 4TO7
V
IO
.«.,.f 30
t
so IO 30
•¿ rmt
DAYS POST INJECTION
Fig. 2. Recovery of clonogenic tumor cells from mice bearing nonmetastatic primary tumors. A, mice were given injections of 1 x 10* 67NR tumor cells in the
mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs removed. B, mice were given injections of 1 x 10*
I68FARN tumor cells in the mammary fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes and lungs were removed. The
draining lymph node in the mammary fatpad was removed through day 21, after which the size of primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The
draining brachial lymph nodes were collected throughout the experiment except on day 50. C, mice were given injections of 1 x IO54TO7 tumor cells in the mammary
fatpad. At multiple intervals, groups of mice were bled and then sacrificed, and lymph nodes, lungs, and livers removed. The draining lymph node in the mammary
fatpad was removed through day 19, after which the size of the primary tumor made it difficult to find the lymph node. The draining brachial lymph nodes were
collected throughout the experiment. The tissues were processed as detailed in "Materials and Methods." The data were expressed as geometric means for each tissue.
The symbols indicate which tissues were sampled and the day on which sampling was done: .. all tissues for that day; *, blood and lymph nodes only.
of the primary 67NR tumors at the time of necropsy (6.6 ±1.5
g and 11.2 ±4.6 g in the 2 experiments) far exceeded the size
of either 66cl4 (2.6 ±0.3 g and 2.3 ±0.8 g at necropsy) or 4T1
(1.9 ±0.2 g and 1.7 ±0.5 g at necropsy) primary tumors, when
metastatic nodules were detectable in animals with the latter 2
tumor lines.
The nonmetastatic line 168FARN cells spread through the
lymphatics, since clonogenic cells were recovered from draining
100
80
LEGEND:
4TO7 ' •¿
66cl4 ' »
4T1 * *
67NR «• »
IMFARN 0--0
ž 4TO7 able to complete
all steps except the
final one.
ž Spread via the blood to
lungs and occasionally
to livers, but did not
establish progressively
growing metastatic
nodules.
ž Necropsy, visible
nodules absent but
clonogenic cells were
recovered in lungs.
25. ž Aggregation and initial arrest of [125I]IUrd-
labeled cells (identify tumor cells) similar for
metastatic and nonmetastatic clones, but
clearance was much more rapid for
nonmetastatic clone than for a metastatic
one.
26. ž Intravasation appears to be an important
selective step. (67NR appears unable to
leave the primary site).
ž cells more highly efficient at colonizing lungs
following iv injection were similar in abilities
to spontaneously metastasize from im
tumors.
27. ž We have established an experimental model
that allow the validation of many phenotypes
implicated in metastasis.
ž has value in analysis of tumor cell
interactions.
¢ Demonstrate clonal dominance and interactions
affecting responses to chemotherapeutic drugs.
¢ Nonmetastatic subpopulations derived from mouse
mammary tumor used in our study may metastasize in
the presence of some metastatic subpopulations.
28. ž Central aim in the study of metastasis:
understand the nature and distinct genetic
and epigenetic changes that program these
individual steps.
29. ž Previous attempts:
ž Microarray analyses
¡ Generated gene expression profiles that are
predictive of metastasis.
¡ Powerful for producing fingerprints, but hard to
elucidate specific contributions of each genes.
ž Experimental animal models
¡ Comparing melanoma cells and their metastatic
derivatives, found RhoC important for pulmonary
metastasis.
¡ Most of these models rely on introduction of
tumor cells directly into systemic circulation.
30. ž Injected cells from four
lines into the mammary
glands of BALB/c mice.
ž Group X: intravasation.
Altered in 168FARN, 4TO7,
and 4T1, but not in 67NR.
ž Group Y: extravasation.
Altered in 4TO7 and 4T1,
but not in 67NR and
168FARN.
ž Group Z: growth into
secondary tumors. Altered
in 4T1, but not in 4TO7,
67NR and 168FARN.
31. ž Twist stood out.
ž 2nd most strongly upregulated in Group X.
ž Known functions as a master regulator of
embryonic morphogenesis.
32. Twist is not required for tumor formation
Twist increases the number of metastatic
nodules
Twist promotes
epithelial-mesenchymal transition
(EMT) and cell migration
33. ž Using gene expression array analysis,
identified genes involved in metastasis. Twist
and Twist-induced EMT are important
components of tumor metastasis.
34. ž E-Cadherin – important calcium dependent
cell to cell adhesion molecule.
ž Research has shown the importance of E-
Cadherin when it comes to suppressing a
tumor.
ž Loss of E-Cadherin has been shown to
increase metastatic effect in cancer cell
lines.
ž ϒ-‐Linolenic
Acid
has
been
shown
to
improve
expression
of
E-‐Cadherin.
35.
36.
37. Drawbacks:
ž These results come from various types of cancers
where most of the breast cancer cell lines did
not seem to have produced an effect on E-
Cadherin when given GLA.
ž Used MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and ZR-751.
We wish to use our cell lines as well as assess the
effect in an in vivo model in addition to in vivo.
ž Western Blotting – (E-Cadherin)
ž Immunostaining – (E-Cadherin)
ž Aggregation Assays
ž Invasions Assay
39. ž Metastatic Breast Cancer. (2015). National Breast Cancer Foundation. Retrieved from
http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/metastatic-breast-cancer
ž Metastatic Cancer. (2013, March 10). National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from
http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/what-is-cancer/metastatic-fact-sheet
ž How cancer can spread. (2014, October 29). Cancer Research UK. Retrieved from
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/what-is-cancer/how-cancer-can-spread
ž Hayes, D.F. (2015, May 5). Patient Information: Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (beyond the
basics). UpToDate. Retrieved from
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-metastatic-breast-cancer-beyond-the-basics
ž Russel, T. (2013, November 26). Understanding Breast Cancer through innovative laboratory
models. Aegis. Retrieved from
http://aegiscreative.com/blog/creating-laboratory-models-help-us-understand-breast-cancer/
ž Mouse Models of Breast Cancer Metastasis. (n.d.) Retrieved May 2nd, 2016 from the Metastatic
Breast Cancer Wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Mouse_models_of_breast_cancer_metastasis#Genetically_engineered_mice_to_study_metastasis
ž Jenkins, D. (2005, April 8). Bioluminescent human breast cancer cell lines that permit rapid and
sensitive in vivo detection of mammary tumors and multiple metastases in immune deficient
mice. Biomed Central. Retrieved from
http://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/bcr1026
ž Jiang, W, et. al. Regulation of the expression of E-Cadherin on Human Cancer Cells by Linolenic
Acid. Cancer Research. 55; 5043-5048, 1995.
ž Aslakson C; Miller, F. Selective Events in the Metastatic Process Defined by Analysis of
Dissemination of Subpopulations of a Mouse Mammary Tumor. Cancer Research 52, 1399-1405,
March 15, 1992
ž Yang J et al. Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor
metastasis. Cell. 2004 June 25; 117(7): 927-39.