We are in a time of dizzying change. It’s estimated that nearly half of all jobs could be at risk over the next two decades because of Artificial Intelligence, automation, Cloud and IoT.
Humankind has entered uncharted territory in terms of the pace of technological change. The Fourth Industrial Revolution will confront us all - so how do we make sense of it and prepare ourselves for a not-so-dystopian future?
4. Why everyone needs to be ready for the
Fourth Industrial Revolution
SAMUEL WILLIAMS
5. MISSION OBJECTIVE…
What does “possible” look like,
taste like, feel like…
Some ideas, frameworks and ways
to navigate Industry 4.0…
Challenge you to…
Samsofy
9. Degree of
complexity
1800 1900 2000 Today
Time
First
Industrial
Revolution
through the introduction
of mechanical
production facilities with
the help of water and
steam power
First mechanical loom, 1784
Second
Industrial
Revolution
through the
introduction of a
division of labour and
mass production with
the help of electrical
energy
First assembly line Cincinnati slaughter,
1870
Third
Industrial
Revolution
through the use of
electronic and IT
systems that further
automate production
First programmable logic controller
(PLC), Modicon 084, 1969
Fourth
Industrial
Revolution
through the use of
cyber-physical
systems
Humanity will change more in the next 20 years more than the 300 years before
18. Geoffrey Moore’s Model of Disruption Types…
18
Infrastructure Model
Raspberry Pi, Cloud, SaaS, BYOD, Virtualisation,
Containerisation, Micro-services
Business Model
Uber, YouTube, Spotify, SalesForce.com,
Autonomous Cars, 3D Parts Printing, Amazon
Prime
Operating Model
Mobile Banking, Amazon, e-Bay, Self-Service,
Google Nest, Drone Deliveries
23. Managing a Portfolio
The Three Horizons Model
Horizon 1
0 to 12 months
Horizon 2
12 to 36 months
Horizon 3
36 to 72 months
Current
Businesses
Generate
today’s cash
flow
High Growth
Businesses
Today’s
revenue growth
+ tomorrow’s
cash flow
Growth Options
Options on
future
high-growth
businesses
Expected Window of Returns
Accumulated Total Returns
Geoffrey Moore
24. A Zone Based Approach to Innovation Effectiveness
Disruptive
Innovations
Sustaining
Innovations
Delivers
Material
Revenue
Consumes
Investment
Incubation
Zone
Performance
Zone
Transformation
Zone
Productivity
Zone
Horizon 1
Horizon 1
Horizon 2
Horizon 3
Geoffrey Moore
29. Heaven or Hell, Dystopia or Utopia,
Abundance or Scarcity?
Perspective, Ethics and New Economics.
Your personal agility will be more valuable
than past achievement.
30. How to make innovation work using an
intrapreneurial approach: Lessons from LEGO,
SAS and Siemens
DAVID GRAM
31. Radical Innovation Through
Intrapreneurship
Image
by
Samsofy
David Gram, Executive Advisor & Founder of Diplomatic Rebels™
41. CORE
BUSINESS
LEVEL OF
INNOVATION
LEVEL OF RISK /
UNCERTAINTY
CORE
FRONT-END
RADICAL
FRONT-END
Continuous
Improvement /
Refresh
Incremental
Innovation
Radical
Innovation
Stage-Gate
Agile Stage-Gate
Agile
42. “Exploring the future business, today”
LEGO Future Lab: Invent the Future of Play!
➢ International team
➢ Small Core teams
➢ Agile experimentation
➢ The Rebels of the organization…
44. Innovation Culture
Team Process Measure
Building Capability for Agile Experimentation
Design
Thinking
Agile
Execution
Business
Modelling
Experience
Designer
Project
Designer
Business
Designer
Desirability
FeasibilityViability
66. LEGO CUUSOO
lanceres
20102009 2011
Elephant
Design møder
LEGO
2012 2013
Shinkay and
Hayabusa
lanceres
LEGO Minecraft
lanceres
Lancering af ny
global platform
2014
LEGO Ideas
overføres til
kerne-
forretningen
The journey to user participation
70. So, Be a Rebel!
But be diplomatic about it…
Top 5 Advice on self-disruption:
1. People will hate your project. Accept it.
2. Only break the rules you understand.
3. Build a tribe.
4. Write love letters.
5. Make people shine.
Diplomatic Rebels™…
77. PUBLICATION OF THIS INFORMATION IS DIRECTLY
PROHIBITED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE ESPIONAGE LAW
TOP SECRET CLASSIFICATION
78. “The entire operation smelled of 20 years to life.
Our lawyers were cautious. The senior partner told me if we
chose to publish, his firm would refuse to defend us.”
Arthur “Punch” Sulzberger
79. “The Pentagon Papers were long, very long. But one thing was
undeniable. If I’d been in charge of that mess I’d have tried to
keep it secret too.”
Arthur “Punch” Sulzberger
80. “These were extraordinary documents proving deceit of the
people by their elected officials. I had no doubt that the
American people had a right to read them and that we at The
Times had an obligation to publish them.”
Arthur “Punch” Sulzberger