ABHISHEK ANTIBIOTICS PPT MICROBIOLOGY // USES OF ANTIOBIOTICS TYPES OF ANTIB...
CRP DSM and E Framework
1. CRP DS
M&E Framework
Enrico Bonaiuti
Research Program Coordinator
CRP-DS Planning workshop for the Implementation of
the Gender Strategy
26th – 27th May, 2014
Holiday Inn Hotel - Amman, Jordan
1
2. Agenda
1. Definition
2. Program Management Office Goals
3. Timeline
4. Framework
5. Impact pathway
6. Performance Monitoring
7. Reporting
8. FPs activities mapped to IDO 5 (gender)
9. CO Indicators
10. CO result-related definitions
11. Results for mapped activities
2
3. Timeline
2014
1. May: Define internal monitoring system based on specific System CRP
characteristics; establish baseline data required
2. June: Set responsibilities at regional and FP level & revise targets
3. July: Define targets timeline
4. August: Launch beta version of web based data collection system based on
other CRPs experience.
5. September: Visit partner or arrange a workshop with the M&E POC
6. November: Review web based system usage and constrains analysis
7. December: Extract monitoring data and re-orient the system; Share M&E
strategies among partners for comments
3
5. Activities mapped to IDO5
WAS: 19 Activities in total - 7 Activities mapped in IDO5 (1 ALS) -
10% of FP budget allocation
NAWA: 45 Activities in total - 6 Activities mapped in IDO5 - 25%
of FP budget allocation
ESA: 21 Activities in total - 9 Activities mapped in IDO5 - 11% of
FP budget allocation
CA: 24 Activities in total - 19 Activities mapped in IDO5 - 9% of
FP budget allocation
SA: 48 Activities in total - 1 Activities mapped in IDO5 - 0.15% of
FP budget allocation
5
6. CGIAR Reporting
Data and successful stories
• Which are our targets? (2014)
• Can we identify deviations?
• How do we report successful stories of outcomes?
• Standard reporting for the CO. Table 1 and table 2
(Annual report)
6
7. CGIAR Indicators
KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA
1. Flagship products: These are frameworks and concepts that are significant
and complete enough to have been highlighted on web pages, publicized
through blog stories, press releases and/or policy briefs. They are
significant in that they should be likely to change the way stakeholders
along the impact pathway allocate resources and/or implement activities.
They should be products that change the way these stakeholders think and
act. Tools, decision-support tools, guidelines and/or training manuals are
not included in this indicator.
2. % having explicit target of women farmers/NRM managers
3. % having been assessed for likely gender-disaggregated impact
7
8. CGIAR Indicators - DS annual report 2013
KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA
8
# CO Indicators WAS NAWA ESA CA SA
1 Flagship products 1 12 8 6 0
2
% having explicit target of women
farmers/NRMmanagers
0% 50% 75% 0% 0%
3
% having been assessed for likely
gender-disaggregated impact
0% 50% 50% 0% 0%
9. CGIAR Indicators
KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA
4. Tools: These are significant decision-support tools, guidelines, and/or
training manuals that are significant and complete enough to have been
highlighted on web pages, publicized through blog stories, press releases
and/or policy briefs. They are significant in that they should be likely to
change the way stakeholders along the impact pathway allocate resources
and/or implement activities
5. % having explicit target of women farmers/NRM managers
6. % having been assessed for likely gender-disaggregated impact
9
10. CGIAR Indicators - DS annual report 2013
KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA
10
# CO Indicators WAS NAWA ESA CA SA
4 Tools 2 25 0 0 0
5
% having explicit target of women
farmers/NRMmanagers
0 50% 0 0 0
6
% having been assessed for likely
gender-disaggregated impact
0 30% 0 0 0
11. CGIAR Indicators - DS annual report 2013
CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND INNOVATION PLATFORMS
13. Trainees in short-term programs facilitated by CRP (male)
14. Female
15. Trainees in long-term programs facilitated by CRP (male)
16. Female
11
# CO Indicators WAS NAWA ESA CA SA
13
Trainees in short-term programs
facilitated by CRP (male)
100 1,248 626 100 25,910
14 Female 0 388 423 0 6,074
15
Trainees in long-term programs
facilitated by CRP (male)
0 24 2 0 0
16 Female 6 15 0 0 0
12. CGIAR Indicators - DS annual report 2013
TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
18. Technologies/NRM practices under research (Phase I) Technologies to be
counted here are agriculture-related and NRM-related technologies and
innovations including those that address climate change adaptation and
mitigation.
19. % having explicit target of women farmers/NRM managers
20. % having been assessed for likely gender-disaggregated impact
12
# CO Indicators WAS NAWA ESA CA SA
18
Technologies/NRMpractices under
research (Phase I)
8 22 0 2 15
19
% having explicit target of women
farmers/NRMmanagers
0% 50% 0% 0% 0%
20
% having been assessed for likely
gender-disaggregated impact
0% 50% 0% 0% 0%
13. CGIAR Indicators - DS annual report 2013
TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
23. Number of technologies /NRM practices field tested (phase II) - Under
“field testing” means that research has moved from focused development
to broader testing (pilot project phase) and this testing is underway under
conditions intended to duplicate those encountered by potential users of
the new technology.
25. % of above innovations/approaches/options that are targeted at
decreasing inequality between men and women
13
# CO Indicators WAS NAWA ESA CA SA
23
Number of technologies /NRM
practices field tested (phase II)
0 22 9 2 15
25
% of above that are targeted at
decreasing inequality ….
0% 20% 0% 0% 0%
14. CGIAR Indicators - DS annual report 2013
TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
34. Number of farmers and others who have applied new technologies or
management practices as a result of CRP research (a. male, b. female)
14
# CO Indicators WAS NAWA ESA CA SA
34
Number of farmers and others who
have applied …. (undefined)
50 5,263 0 0 4,000,000
a Male ? ? 0 0 ?
b Female ? ? 0 0 ?
17. CO result-related definitions
17
Research output: are the products, services or attributes resulting from the
research activities and linked to the objectives. e.g. a report, publication, DNA
sequence, molecular markers, new methodology, new policy, new soil
management practice,, newsletter, tool, website, conference, etc...
Research outcomes: They represent adoption or further use of research
outputs by the immediate users targeted by the CRP, such as smallholder
farmers, NARS researchers or national policy makers. Research outcomes are
generated as a result of research, capacity building and advocacy activities by
the CRP and include Capacity changes, the changes in knowledge, attitudes
and/or skills, of the beneficiaries and intermediaries and Behavioral changes ,
in actual practices that occur in the beneficiaries and intermediaries;
beneficiaries and intermediaries do things differently or use the research
outputs.
18. CO results-related definitions
18
Intermediate development outcomes: changes that occur in the medium
term that are intended to affect positively the welfare of the targeted
population or environment, and which result, in part, from research carried
out by the CGIAR and its partners. The IDOs are attributable to CRP-level
activities and are necessary precursors and logically linked to the SLOs
Impact: The ultimate positive/negative, direct and indirect consequences of
the CRPs work on the status and state of selected development variables
concerning the SLOs - which are themselves related to the attainment of
Millennium Development Goals and the SDGs. Impacts are the overall and
long-term effects that a CRP contributes to.
Notas do Editor
In the M&E the trick is not just counting the number of outputs produced against the target, it is most importantly telling successful stories of outcomes in medium to large scale. Some CRPs call this case studies and they solicit form the centers outcome stories that have substance and that can be verified. So, you need to alert FP coordinators that they must plan for reporting these outcome stories/ case studies from the start of the year and should provide the supporting document.
In the M&E the trick is not just counting the number of outputs produced against the target, it is most importantly telling successful stories of outcomes in medium to large scale. Some CRPs call this case studies and they solicit form the centers outcome stories that have substance and that can be verified. So, you need to alert FP coordinators that they must plan for reporting these outcome stories/ case studies from the start of the year and should provide the supporting document.