SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 25
ESP 179- Winter 2013

     CEQA and EIA Basics
      January 10, 2013

   Instructor: Trevor Macenski
Extra Credit:
Charter City and a General Law
 California state law dictates that cities may be organized under either
     General laws of the State
     Under a charter adopted by the local voters.
          This authority is set forth in the California Government Code commencing with Section
           34100.

 Cities that are organized under the general laws of the State (Section
  34102)
     Have less autonomy than those that adopt their own charter (Section 34101).
     General law cities follow the laws set forth in the Government Code commencing
      with Section 34000.

 Cities that adopt their own charter, may adopt their own procedures for
  matters that are considered “municipal affairs.”
     The California Constitution grants charter cities the power to make and enforce
      all ordinances and resolutions with respect to municipal affairs (California
      Constitution Article XI, Section 5(a)). This is commonly referred to as the “home
      rule” provision.
CEQA Rules and Regulations
• The Statute
   Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21178
    (PRC)
• The Guidelines
   California Code of Regulations Title 14,
    §15000 et seq. (CCR)
• The Courts
   Ongoing court decisions (Case law)
CEQA Lingo
 CEQA: California Environmental Quality Act
    IS: Initial Study
   ND: Negative Declaration
  NOP: Notice of Preparation of EIR
   EIR: Environmental Impact Report
 DEIR: Draft EIR
 FEIR: Final EIR
  NOC: Notice of Completion
 NOD: Notice of Determination
  NOA: Notice of Availability
CEQA Basics
 1969: President Nixon signs National
  Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

 1970: Governor Reagan signs California
  Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

 CEQA (the Statute): Established by
  Legislature
   …and continuously modified by Legislature
   …and “interpreted” by the Courts
CEQA Basics
• Initially intended to apply to publicly-
  sponsored projects only
• 1972: Friends of Mammoth v. Board of
  Supervisors:
   CEQA applies to ‘all’ projects subject to
    public agency discretionary action
Who’s Driving This Bus…
 Lead Agency= Bus Driver
 CEQA is a “Self-executing Statute”
  meaning it is the Lead-Agency’s duty to
  determine what is and is not subject to
  CEQA, and to follow the process.
 Public can go through the legal process
  (suing) to challenge decisions
Purpose of CEQA
 Inform government decision makers and the public about
  the potential significant environmental impacts of proposed
  activities

 Identify ways that environmental impact(s) can be avoided
  or significantly reduced

 Prevent significant avoidable damage to the environment
  by requiring changes in the project through the use of
  alternatives and mitigation

 Disclose to the public the reason that an agency approved a
  project notwithstanding its environmental impacts
CEQA Policy Statements
 PRC 21000-21004 & Guidelines 15002,
  15003:
   Environmental Protection
   General Welfare
   Don’t exceed thresholds
   Preserve and enhance
   Concerned effort to control pollution
   Must give major consideration to env.
   Clean air and water
   Don’t eliminate the bugs and bunnies.
CEQA Policy Streamlining
 PRC 21003 & Guidelines 15003, 15006:
   Integration of CEQA into other laws
   Make documents useful
   Omit unnecessary language
   Feasible Mitigation and Alternatives
   Database to reduce delays
   Efficiency to conserve resources
   Environment on the mind
   Whole of the action
   Good faith effort
   Tool for informed and balanced decisions
CEQA Objectives                      CEQA Requirements

Disclose Env. Impacts                   IS, ND, EIR

Identify and prevent env. damage        Mitigation measures
                                        Alternatives
                                        Mitigation monitoring
Disclose agency decision making         Findings
                                        States of overriding considerations

Enhance public participation            Scoping
                                        Public notice requirements
                                        Response to comments
                                        Legal enforcement procedures
                                        Citizen access to the courts


Foster intergovernmental coordination   Early consultation
                                        Scoping meetings
                                        Notices of preparation
                                        State Clearinghouse review
CEQA Authorizes Agencies to:
 Require changes in a project to lessen or
  avoid significant effects, when feasible.
 Disapprove a project to avoid significant
  effects
 Approve a project with significant effects it
  here is no feasible way to lessen or avoid
  the significant effects and the project's
  benefits outweigh these effects
 Impose fees on a project’s applicant for
  CEQA implementation.
It gets political real quick…
 Discretion and Risk
   Full Compliance vs. Losing Tax Revenue


 No one size fits all compliance strategy
   EIR vs. ISMND
     Example: Bell Village Project Vs. Elnoka Village
     Example: Meteorological Towers Yolo vs. Merced


 Convergence of science and the public
   Educate, Disclose, Consider
CEQA Key Players
Lead Agency:                                        Agency W/
                                                                                      Responsible Agency:
      Principal responsibility                                                          Other than the lead agency
                                                   Jurisdiction
      carrying out or                                                                   that has legal responsibility
      approving a project.                                                              for carrying out or
      (e.g. City or County)      Responsible                            Concerned       approving a project. (e.g.
                                  Agencies                               Citizens       Air District)




                                                     LEAD
                                                    AGENCY
                          Environmental
                                                                             Courts
                           Consultants




 Trustee Agencies:                         Project
                                          Applicants
                                                                  Trustee
                                                                  Agencies
 1)     CDFG
 2)     SLC
 3)     Park & Rec
 4)     UC
Public Participation
 “ Privileged position” in the CEQA process
   Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa v.32nd District
    Agricultural Association (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929
 Opportunities:
   Scoping- 15083
   Public Notice and Review- 15072,15087
   Public Hearings and Response to Comments-
    15088
Watchdog? Not really..
 Office of Planning and Research
   Ken Alex
   Scott Morgan

 Major Responsibilities:
   Identifying Responsible Agencies
   Resolving Agency Disputes
   Posting NOC and NOD
   Show me the money!- CDFG Fees
   Guideline changes
Phases in the process
 Preliminary review of a project to
  determine if it’s subject to CEQA

 Preparation of an Initial Study to
  determine significant effects
                                   Maybe be combined

 Preparation of an ND, MND, or EIR.
What is a “Project” ?
 Comply with CEQA when you have a
 “project”

 Project: activity undertaken by a public
 agency or a private activity which may
 cause a change in the environment and
 must receive discretionary approval from a
 government agency. 15378 & 21605

 Term “project” = Whole of the action(s)
What is NOT a “Project”?
 Non-projects:
   Legislative activities
   Admin or maintenance activities
   Proposals
   School closings
   City place a initiative on the ballot
   Government organization activities
 Statutory Exemptions
 Categorical Exemptions
Exemptions
 Statutory
   Activities exempted from all or part of CEQA by
    the State Legislature regardless of impacts
    (policy decision)
 Categorical
   Classes of projects which are exempted from
    CEQA because they typically do not have
    significant impacts (there are exceptions)
Statutory Exemption Examples
 1984 L.A. Olympic games
 Family day care homes
 Specified mass transit projects
 State and regional transportation improvement
  programs
 Projects located outside California
 Certain pipeline work
 Air quality permits
 Ministerial projects
 Emergency projects
 Other miscellaneous per CCR §15282
Categorical Exemptions
 Classes of projects that do not have a
  significant impact on the environment
 Not applicable when cumulative impact is
  significant or when there is a potential
  significant impact due to unusual
  circumstances
   Scenic highways
   Hazardous waste sites
   Historical resources
Categorical Exemptions
 Existing facilities      Surplus property sales
 Reconstruction           Land acquisition for
 Small structures          wildlife conservation
 Minor alterations to     Minor additions to
  land or land use          school
 Actions by regulatory    Minor land divisions
  agencies for natural     Transfer of ownership
  resources protection      for parks
  or protection of the     Total of 33 categories
  environment               outlined in section
                            15301 of Guidelines
Notice of Exemption
 If your “project” is exempt, a Notice of
  Exemption (NOE) may be filed with County
  Clerk
 The filing of an NOE shortens the time that
  someone can file a legal challenge to the
  exemption from 180 days to 35 days
Questions?
  Thank You

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a January 10th Lecture

ESP171-CEQA and Land Use Planning
ESP171-CEQA and Land Use PlanningESP171-CEQA and Land Use Planning
ESP171-CEQA and Land Use Planning
CEQAplanner
 
January 15th- IS-ND-MND
January 15th- IS-ND-MNDJanuary 15th- IS-ND-MND
January 15th- IS-ND-MND
CEQAplanner
 
General Plan, Zoning And Entitlements
General Plan, Zoning And EntitlementsGeneral Plan, Zoning And Entitlements
General Plan, Zoning And Entitlements
APMeyerhoff
 
Ghana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.ppt
Ghana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.pptGhana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.ppt
Ghana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.ppt
LouisLuiz
 
NEPA Changes For Local Government
NEPA Changes For Local GovernmentNEPA Changes For Local Government
NEPA Changes For Local Government
videoman77
 
Practical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated Property
Practical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated PropertyPractical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated Property
Practical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated Property
bishopcj
 

Semelhante a January 10th Lecture (20)

Sepa August2011
Sepa August2011Sepa August2011
Sepa August2011
 
CEQA Overview
CEQA OverviewCEQA Overview
CEQA Overview
 
2012 ceqa presentation for ce class
2012 ceqa presentation for ce class2012 ceqa presentation for ce class
2012 ceqa presentation for ce class
 
ESP171-CEQA and Land Use Planning
ESP171-CEQA and Land Use PlanningESP171-CEQA and Land Use Planning
ESP171-CEQA and Land Use Planning
 
Environmental Impact Assessment and Meaningful Citizen Participation
Environmental Impact Assessment and Meaningful Citizen ParticipationEnvironmental Impact Assessment and Meaningful Citizen Participation
Environmental Impact Assessment and Meaningful Citizen Participation
 
January 15th- IS-ND-MND
January 15th- IS-ND-MNDJanuary 15th- IS-ND-MND
January 15th- IS-ND-MND
 
EIA PPT.pptx
EIA PPT.pptxEIA PPT.pptx
EIA PPT.pptx
 
EIA PPT.pdf
EIA PPT.pdfEIA PPT.pdf
EIA PPT.pdf
 
NEPA and Permitting 101: A Dialogue on the Basics
NEPA and Permitting 101: A Dialogue on the BasicsNEPA and Permitting 101: A Dialogue on the Basics
NEPA and Permitting 101: A Dialogue on the Basics
 
General Plan, Zoning And Entitlements
General Plan, Zoning And EntitlementsGeneral Plan, Zoning And Entitlements
General Plan, Zoning And Entitlements
 
All you need to know about Environmental Clearance.pdf
All you need to know about Environmental Clearance.pdfAll you need to know about Environmental Clearance.pdf
All you need to know about Environmental Clearance.pdf
 
Environmental Clearance and Its Regulations and Procedures.pdf
Environmental Clearance and Its Regulations and Procedures.pdfEnvironmental Clearance and Its Regulations and Procedures.pdf
Environmental Clearance and Its Regulations and Procedures.pdf
 
Ghana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.ppt
Ghana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.pptGhana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.ppt
Ghana Fellowship Power Point Presentation.ppt
 
NEPA Changes For Local Government
NEPA Changes For Local GovernmentNEPA Changes For Local Government
NEPA Changes For Local Government
 
Practical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated Property
Practical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated PropertyPractical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated Property
Practical Solutions For Buying And Selling Contaminated Property
 
Environment impact assessment
Environment impact assessmentEnvironment impact assessment
Environment impact assessment
 
Engineering Analysis for Urban Drainage Systems
Engineering Analysis for Urban Drainage SystemsEngineering Analysis for Urban Drainage Systems
Engineering Analysis for Urban Drainage Systems
 
Nepa streamlining icf_rw_041818
Nepa streamlining icf_rw_041818Nepa streamlining icf_rw_041818
Nepa streamlining icf_rw_041818
 
Eia
EiaEia
Eia
 
Water Board Sticks
Water Board SticksWater Board Sticks
Water Board Sticks
 

Mais de CEQAplanner

February 26 esp 179 noise
February 26  esp 179 noiseFebruary 26  esp 179 noise
February 26 esp 179 noise
CEQAplanner
 
February 21 esp 179 bio final
February 21  esp 179 bio finalFebruary 21  esp 179 bio final
February 21 esp 179 bio final
CEQAplanner
 
Air Quality Basics
Air Quality Basics Air Quality Basics
Air Quality Basics
CEQAplanner
 
February 7 esp 179 haz aes
February 7  esp 179 haz aes February 7  esp 179 haz aes
February 7 esp 179 haz aes
CEQAplanner
 
Feb. 5 th 2013 esp 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013  esp 179-cultural 2013Feb. 5 th 2013  esp 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013 esp 179-cultural 2013
CEQAplanner
 
Feb. 5 th 2013 ESP 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013  ESP 179-cultural 2013Feb. 5 th 2013  ESP 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013 ESP 179-cultural 2013
CEQAplanner
 
Jan. 31st ESP 179 pop&housing
Jan. 31st  ESP 179 pop&housingJan. 31st  ESP 179 pop&housing
Jan. 31st ESP 179 pop&housing
CEQAplanner
 
January 29st esp 179 land use-ag-rec
January 29st  esp 179 land use-ag-recJanuary 29st  esp 179 land use-ag-rec
January 29st esp 179 land use-ag-rec
CEQAplanner
 
January 24 ESP 179 GEO& Soils
January 24 ESP 179 GEO& SoilsJanuary 24 ESP 179 GEO& Soils
January 24 ESP 179 GEO& Soils
CEQAplanner
 
January 22 ESP 179 Hydro
January 22  ESP 179 HydroJanuary 22  ESP 179 Hydro
January 22 ESP 179 Hydro
CEQAplanner
 
EIR Review Assignment
EIR Review AssignmentEIR Review Assignment
EIR Review Assignment
CEQAplanner
 
January 8th esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basics
January 8th  esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basicsJanuary 8th  esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basics
January 8th esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basics
CEQAplanner
 
ESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 final
ESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 finalESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 final
ESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 final
CEQAplanner
 
Sample Pres. Gov't Center
Sample Pres. Gov't CenterSample Pres. Gov't Center
Sample Pres. Gov't Center
CEQAplanner
 
Agricultural Conversion Study Example
Agricultural Conversion Study ExampleAgricultural Conversion Study Example
Agricultural Conversion Study Example
CEQAplanner
 
ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012
ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012
ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012
CEQAplanner
 

Mais de CEQAplanner (19)

Glance only
Glance onlyGlance only
Glance only
 
February 26 esp 179 noise
February 26  esp 179 noiseFebruary 26  esp 179 noise
February 26 esp 179 noise
 
February 21 esp 179 bio final
February 21  esp 179 bio finalFebruary 21  esp 179 bio final
February 21 esp 179 bio final
 
Air Quality Basics
Air Quality Basics Air Quality Basics
Air Quality Basics
 
February 7 esp 179 haz aes
February 7  esp 179 haz aes February 7  esp 179 haz aes
February 7 esp 179 haz aes
 
Feb. 5 th 2013 esp 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013  esp 179-cultural 2013Feb. 5 th 2013  esp 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013 esp 179-cultural 2013
 
Feb. 5 th 2013 ESP 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013  ESP 179-cultural 2013Feb. 5 th 2013  ESP 179-cultural 2013
Feb. 5 th 2013 ESP 179-cultural 2013
 
Jan. 31st ESP 179 pop&housing
Jan. 31st  ESP 179 pop&housingJan. 31st  ESP 179 pop&housing
Jan. 31st ESP 179 pop&housing
 
January 29st esp 179 land use-ag-rec
January 29st  esp 179 land use-ag-recJanuary 29st  esp 179 land use-ag-rec
January 29st esp 179 land use-ag-rec
 
January 24 ESP 179 GEO& Soils
January 24 ESP 179 GEO& SoilsJanuary 24 ESP 179 GEO& Soils
January 24 ESP 179 GEO& Soils
 
January 22 ESP 179 Hydro
January 22  ESP 179 HydroJanuary 22  ESP 179 Hydro
January 22 ESP 179 Hydro
 
EIR Review Assignment
EIR Review AssignmentEIR Review Assignment
EIR Review Assignment
 
What is EIA????
What is EIA????What is EIA????
What is EIA????
 
January 8th esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basics
January 8th  esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basicsJanuary 8th  esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basics
January 8th esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basics
 
ESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 final
ESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 finalESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 final
ESP syllabus twm 1 02-2013 final
 
AQ and GHG Basics- Sonoma State
AQ and GHG Basics- Sonoma StateAQ and GHG Basics- Sonoma State
AQ and GHG Basics- Sonoma State
 
Sample Pres. Gov't Center
Sample Pres. Gov't CenterSample Pres. Gov't Center
Sample Pres. Gov't Center
 
Agricultural Conversion Study Example
Agricultural Conversion Study ExampleAgricultural Conversion Study Example
Agricultural Conversion Study Example
 
ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012
ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012
ESP 179 Syllabus- Winter 2012
 

January 10th Lecture

  • 1. ESP 179- Winter 2013 CEQA and EIA Basics January 10, 2013 Instructor: Trevor Macenski
  • 2. Extra Credit: Charter City and a General Law  California state law dictates that cities may be organized under either  General laws of the State  Under a charter adopted by the local voters.  This authority is set forth in the California Government Code commencing with Section 34100.  Cities that are organized under the general laws of the State (Section 34102)  Have less autonomy than those that adopt their own charter (Section 34101).  General law cities follow the laws set forth in the Government Code commencing with Section 34000.  Cities that adopt their own charter, may adopt their own procedures for matters that are considered “municipal affairs.”  The California Constitution grants charter cities the power to make and enforce all ordinances and resolutions with respect to municipal affairs (California Constitution Article XI, Section 5(a)). This is commonly referred to as the “home rule” provision.
  • 3. CEQA Rules and Regulations • The Statute  Public Resources Code §§ 21000-21178 (PRC) • The Guidelines  California Code of Regulations Title 14, §15000 et seq. (CCR) • The Courts  Ongoing court decisions (Case law)
  • 4. CEQA Lingo CEQA: California Environmental Quality Act IS: Initial Study ND: Negative Declaration NOP: Notice of Preparation of EIR EIR: Environmental Impact Report DEIR: Draft EIR FEIR: Final EIR NOC: Notice of Completion NOD: Notice of Determination NOA: Notice of Availability
  • 5. CEQA Basics  1969: President Nixon signs National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  1970: Governor Reagan signs California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)  CEQA (the Statute): Established by Legislature  …and continuously modified by Legislature  …and “interpreted” by the Courts
  • 6. CEQA Basics • Initially intended to apply to publicly- sponsored projects only • 1972: Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors:  CEQA applies to ‘all’ projects subject to public agency discretionary action
  • 7. Who’s Driving This Bus…  Lead Agency= Bus Driver  CEQA is a “Self-executing Statute” meaning it is the Lead-Agency’s duty to determine what is and is not subject to CEQA, and to follow the process.  Public can go through the legal process (suing) to challenge decisions
  • 8. Purpose of CEQA  Inform government decision makers and the public about the potential significant environmental impacts of proposed activities  Identify ways that environmental impact(s) can be avoided or significantly reduced  Prevent significant avoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in the project through the use of alternatives and mitigation  Disclose to the public the reason that an agency approved a project notwithstanding its environmental impacts
  • 9. CEQA Policy Statements  PRC 21000-21004 & Guidelines 15002, 15003:  Environmental Protection  General Welfare  Don’t exceed thresholds  Preserve and enhance  Concerned effort to control pollution  Must give major consideration to env.  Clean air and water  Don’t eliminate the bugs and bunnies.
  • 10. CEQA Policy Streamlining  PRC 21003 & Guidelines 15003, 15006:  Integration of CEQA into other laws  Make documents useful  Omit unnecessary language  Feasible Mitigation and Alternatives  Database to reduce delays  Efficiency to conserve resources  Environment on the mind  Whole of the action  Good faith effort  Tool for informed and balanced decisions
  • 11. CEQA Objectives CEQA Requirements Disclose Env. Impacts IS, ND, EIR Identify and prevent env. damage Mitigation measures Alternatives Mitigation monitoring Disclose agency decision making Findings States of overriding considerations Enhance public participation Scoping Public notice requirements Response to comments Legal enforcement procedures Citizen access to the courts Foster intergovernmental coordination Early consultation Scoping meetings Notices of preparation State Clearinghouse review
  • 12. CEQA Authorizes Agencies to:  Require changes in a project to lessen or avoid significant effects, when feasible.  Disapprove a project to avoid significant effects  Approve a project with significant effects it here is no feasible way to lessen or avoid the significant effects and the project's benefits outweigh these effects  Impose fees on a project’s applicant for CEQA implementation.
  • 13. It gets political real quick…  Discretion and Risk  Full Compliance vs. Losing Tax Revenue  No one size fits all compliance strategy  EIR vs. ISMND Example: Bell Village Project Vs. Elnoka Village Example: Meteorological Towers Yolo vs. Merced  Convergence of science and the public  Educate, Disclose, Consider
  • 14. CEQA Key Players Lead Agency: Agency W/ Responsible Agency: Principal responsibility Other than the lead agency Jurisdiction carrying out or that has legal responsibility approving a project. for carrying out or (e.g. City or County) Responsible Concerned approving a project. (e.g. Agencies Citizens Air District) LEAD AGENCY Environmental Courts Consultants Trustee Agencies: Project Applicants Trustee Agencies 1) CDFG 2) SLC 3) Park & Rec 4) UC
  • 15. Public Participation  “ Privileged position” in the CEQA process  Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa v.32nd District Agricultural Association (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929  Opportunities:  Scoping- 15083  Public Notice and Review- 15072,15087  Public Hearings and Response to Comments- 15088
  • 16. Watchdog? Not really..  Office of Planning and Research  Ken Alex  Scott Morgan  Major Responsibilities:  Identifying Responsible Agencies  Resolving Agency Disputes  Posting NOC and NOD  Show me the money!- CDFG Fees  Guideline changes
  • 17. Phases in the process  Preliminary review of a project to determine if it’s subject to CEQA  Preparation of an Initial Study to determine significant effects Maybe be combined  Preparation of an ND, MND, or EIR.
  • 18. What is a “Project” ?  Comply with CEQA when you have a “project”  Project: activity undertaken by a public agency or a private activity which may cause a change in the environment and must receive discretionary approval from a government agency. 15378 & 21605  Term “project” = Whole of the action(s)
  • 19. What is NOT a “Project”?  Non-projects:  Legislative activities  Admin or maintenance activities  Proposals  School closings  City place a initiative on the ballot  Government organization activities  Statutory Exemptions  Categorical Exemptions
  • 20. Exemptions  Statutory  Activities exempted from all or part of CEQA by the State Legislature regardless of impacts (policy decision)  Categorical  Classes of projects which are exempted from CEQA because they typically do not have significant impacts (there are exceptions)
  • 21. Statutory Exemption Examples  1984 L.A. Olympic games  Family day care homes  Specified mass transit projects  State and regional transportation improvement programs  Projects located outside California  Certain pipeline work  Air quality permits  Ministerial projects  Emergency projects  Other miscellaneous per CCR §15282
  • 22. Categorical Exemptions  Classes of projects that do not have a significant impact on the environment  Not applicable when cumulative impact is significant or when there is a potential significant impact due to unusual circumstances  Scenic highways  Hazardous waste sites  Historical resources
  • 23. Categorical Exemptions  Existing facilities  Surplus property sales  Reconstruction  Land acquisition for  Small structures wildlife conservation  Minor alterations to  Minor additions to land or land use school  Actions by regulatory  Minor land divisions agencies for natural  Transfer of ownership resources protection for parks or protection of the  Total of 33 categories environment outlined in section 15301 of Guidelines
  • 24. Notice of Exemption  If your “project” is exempt, a Notice of Exemption (NOE) may be filed with County Clerk  The filing of an NOE shortens the time that someone can file a legal challenge to the exemption from 180 days to 35 days