Summary of the Auditing Standards issued by the ICAI

1. SA 540 and SA 550
Presented by – Bhavesh Trilokani

2. What are Standards on Auditing?
 Auditing Standards provide minimum guidance for the auditor that
helps determine the extent of audit steps and procedures that should
be applied to fulfill the audit objective. They are criteria or yardsticks
against which the quality of the audit results are evaluated.

3. Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates,
and Related Disclosures
Applicable since - April 1, 2009

4. Scope of this SA
 This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditor’s responsibilities
regarding accounting estimates, including fair value accounting
estimates, and related disclosures in an audit of financial statements.
Specifically, it expands on how SA 315 and SA 330 and other relevant
SAs are to be applied in relation to accounting estimates. It also
includes requirements and guidance on misstatements of individual
accounting estimates, and indicators of possible management bias.

5. Objective of the Auditor.
 The objective of the auditor is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence whether in the context of the applicable financial reporting
framework:
i. accounting estimates, including fair value accounting estimates, in the
financial statements, whether recognized or disclosed, are reasonable;
and
ii. related disclosures in the financial statements are adequate.

6. Important Definitions
 For purposes of the SAs, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
i. Accounting estimate – An approximation of a monetary amount in the absence of a
precise means of measurement. This term is used for an amount measured at fair value
where there is estimation uncertainty, as well as for other amounts that require
estimation. Where this SA addresses only accounting estimates involving measurement at
fair value, the term “fair value accounting estimates” is used.
ii. Auditor’s point estimate or auditor’s range – The amount, or range of amounts,
respectively, derived from audit evidence for use in evaluating management’s point
estimate.
iii. Estimation uncertainty – The susceptibility of an accounting estimate and related
disclosures to an inherent lack of precision in its measurement.
iv. Management bias – A lack of neutrality by management in the preparation and
presentation of information.
v. Management’s point estimate – The amount selected by management for recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements as an accounting estimate.

7. Risk Assessment Procedures(RAP) and
Related Activities.
 When performing RAP and related activities to obtain an understanding of the entity and its
environment, including the entity’s internal control, as required by SA 315 the auditor shall obtain an
understanding of the following in order to provide a basis for the identification and assessment of the ROMM for
accounting estimates:
o requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework
o How management identifies those transactions, which may give rise to accounting estimates. And make
inquiries about the selection made so.
o How management makes the accounting estimates, and an understanding of the data on which they are based,
including:
i. The method, including where applicable the model, used in making the accounting estimate;
ii. Relevant controls;
iii. Whether management has used an expert;
iv. The assumptions underlying the accounting estimates;
v. Whether there has been or ought to have been a change from the prior period in the methods for making the accounting estimates,
and if so, why; and
vi. Whether and, if so, how management has assessed the effect of estimation uncertainty.

8. Identifying and Assessing the Risks of
Material Misstatement
 In identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement, as
required by SA 315 the auditor shall evaluate the degree of estimation
uncertainty associated with an accounting estimate.
 The auditor shall determine whether, in the auditor’s judgment, any of
those accounting estimates that have been identified as having high
estimation uncertainty give rise to significant risks.

9. Responses to the Assessed ROMM
 Based on the assessed risks of material misstatement, the auditor shall determine:
i. Whether management has appropriately applied the requirements of the applicable FRF.
ii. Whether the methods for making the accounting estimates are appropriate and have been
applied consistently.
 As per SA 330, the Auditor shall take following actions-
i. Determine whether events occurring up to the date of the auditor’s report provide audit evidence
regarding the accounting estimate.
ii. Test how management made the accounting estimate and the data on which it is based by
checking –
a. Method of Measurement.
b. If any assumptions used by management are whether reasonable or not.
iii. Testing the operating effectiveness of the controls over how the management made accounting
estimates.
iv. Develop a point estimate or a range to evaluate management’s point estimate.

10. Further Substantive Procedures to Respond to
Significant Risks
 Estimation Uncertainty
 For accounting estimates that give rise to significant risks, in addition to other substantive
procedures performed, the auditor shall evaluate the following –
 Consideration of the alternative assumptions and outcomes and reasons for rejection
thereof.
 Whether the assumptions were reasonable.
 If, in the auditor’s judgment, management has not adequately addressed the effects of
estimation uncertainty on the accounting estimates that give rise to significant risks, the
auditor shall, if considered necessary, develop a range with which to evaluate the
reasonableness of the accounting estimate

11. Disclosures Related to Accounting Estimates
 The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about
whether the disclosures in the financial statements related to
accounting estimates are in accordance with the requirements of the
applicable FRF
 For accounting estimates that give rise to significant risks, the auditor
shall also evaluate the adequacy of the disclosure of their estimation
uncertainty in the financial statements in the context of the applicable
FRF

12.  Indicators of Possible Management Bias –
 The auditor shall review the judgments and decisions made by management in the
making of accounting estimates to identify whether there are indicators of possible
management bias. Indicators of possible management bias do not themselves constitute
misstatements for the purposes of drawing conclusions on the reasonableness of
individual accounting estimates.
 Written Representations –
 The auditor shall obtain written representations from management and, where
appropriate, those charged with governance whether they believe significant assumptions
used in making accounting estimates are reasonable.
• Documentation –
 The audit documentation shall include:
a) The basis for the auditor’s conclusions about the reasonableness of accounting estimates and
their disclosure that give rise to significant risks; and
b) Indicators of possible management bias, if any.

13. Related Parties
Applicable since - April 1, 2010

14. Scope of this SA
 This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditor’s responsibilities
regarding related party relationships and transactions when
performing an audit of financial statements. Specifically, it expands on
how SA 315, SA 330 and SA 240 are to be applied in relation to ROMM
associated with related party relationships and transactions.

15. Objective of the Auditor.
 Irrespective of whether the applicable financial reporting framework establishes related party
requirements, to obtain an understanding of related party relationships and transactions
sufficient to be able:
 To recognize fraud risk factors, if any, arising from related party relationships and transactions
that are relevant to the identification and assessment of the ROMM due to fraud; and
 To conclude whether the financial statements, in so far as they are affected by those
relationships and transactions:
i. Achieve a true and fair presentation (for fair presentation frameworks); or
ii. Are not misleading (for compliance frameworks); and
 In addition, where the applicable financial reporting framework establishes related party
requirements, to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether related party
relationships and transactions have been appropriately identified, accounted for and
disclosed in the financial statements in accordance with the framework.

16. Important Definitions
 Arm’s length transaction – A transaction conducted on such terms and conditions as between a willing buyer
and a willing seller who are unrelated and are acting independently of each other and pursuing their own best
interests.
 Related party – A party that is either:
 A related party as defined in the applicable financial reporting framework; or
 Where the applicable financial reporting framework establishes minimal or no related party requirements:
i. A person or other entity that has control or significant influence directly or indirectly through one or
more intermediaries, over the reporting entity;
ii. Another entity over which the reporting entity has control or significant influence, directly or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries; or
iii. Another entity that is under common control with the reporting entity through having:
i. Common controlling ownership;
ii. Owners who are close family members; or
iii. Common key management.
NOTE:- However, entities that are under common control by a state (i.e., a national, regional or local
government) are not considered related unless they engage in significant transactions or share
resources to a significant extent with one another.

17. Related Parties

18. Understanding the Entity’s Related Party
Relationships and Transactions
 The engagement team discussion that SA 315 and SA 240 require shall include specific
consideration of the susceptibility of the financial statements to material misstatement due to
fraud or error that could result from the entity’s related party relationships and transactions.
 So, The auditor shall inquire of management regarding:
i. The identity of the entity’s related parties, including changes from the prior period;
ii. The nature of the relationships betweedn the entity and these related parties; and
iii. Whether the entity entered into any transactions with these related parties during the period
and, if so, the type and purpose of the transactions
 The auditor shall inquire of management and others within the entity, and perform other
RAP considered appropriate, to obtain an understanding of the controls, if any, that
management has established to:
i. Identify, account for, and disclose related party relationships and transactions in accordance
with the applicable financial reporting framework;
ii. Authorise and approve significant transactions and arrangements with related parties; and
iii. Authorise and approve significant transactions and arrangements outside the normal course
of business.

19. Identification and Assessment of the ROMM Associated with Related
Party Relationships and Transactions
 To meet the requirements of SA 315 the auditor shall identify and assess the ROMM
associated with related party relationships and transactions and determine whether any of
those risks are significant risks. In making this determination, the auditor shall treat identified
significant related party transactions outside the entity’s normal course of business as giving
rise to significant risks.
 If the auditor identifies fraud risk factors (including circumstances relating to the existence of
a related party with dominant influence) when performing the RAP and related activities in
connection with related parties, the auditor shall consider such information when identifying
and assessing the ROMM due to fraud in accordance with SA 240.

20. Identification of Previously Unidentified or Undisclosed
Related Parties or Significant Related Party Transactions
 If the auditor identifies related parties or significant related party transactions that
management has not previously identified or disclosed to the auditor, the auditor shall:
i. Promptly communicate the relevant information to the other members of the engagement team;
ii. Where the applicable financial reporting framework establishes related party requirements:
a. Request management to identify all transactions with the newly identified related parties for the
auditor’s further evaluation; and
b. Inquire as to why the entity’s controls over related party relationships and transactions failed to enable
the identification or disclosure of the related party relationships or transactions;
iii. Perform appropriate substantive audit procedures relating to such newly identified related
parties or significant related party transactions; (Reconsider the risk that other related parties or
significant related party transactions may exist that management has not previously identified or
disclosed to the auditor, and perform additional audit procedures as necessary; and
iv. If the non-disclosure by management appears intentional (and therefore indicative of a risk of
material misstatement due to fraud), evaluate the implications for the audit.

21.  Assertions That Related Party Transactions Were Conducted on Terms
Equivalent to Those Prevailing in an Arm’s Length Transaction
 When management has made an assertion in the financial statements to the
effect that a related party transaction was conducted on terms equivalent to those
prevailing in an arm’s length transaction, the auditor shall obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence about the assertion.
 Evaluation of the Accounting for and Disclosure of Identified Related
Party Relationships and Transactions
 In forming an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with SA
700(Revised), the auditor shall evaluate:
i. Whether the identified related party relationships and transactions have been
appropriately accounted for and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework; and
ii. Whether the effects of the related party relationships and transactions:
a. Prevent the financial statements from achieving true and fair presentation (for fair
presentation frameworks); or
b. cause the financial statements to be misleading (for compliance frameworks).

22.  Written Representations –
 Where the applicable financial reporting framework establishes related party
requirements, the auditor shall obtain written representations from management
and, where appropriate, those charged with governance that:
i. They have disclosed to the auditor the identity of the entity’s related parties and all the related
party relationships and transactions of which they are aware; and
ii. They have appropriately accounted for and disclosed such relationships and transactions in
accordance with the requirements of the framework.
 Documentation-
 In meeting the documentation requirements of SA 230 and other SAs, the auditor shall
include in the audit documentation the names of the identified related parties and the
nature of the related party relationships.