CPI courswork

1. Module Title CPI 2020
Student Name Ben Walker
Student Number b9008621
Mark Awarded 62
(Summary of literature search) Limited summary of literature search with substantial limitations
(Search strategy) Clear, systematic literature searching strategy
(Results of search) Clearly defined results, systematically displayed
(Best evidence - selection of sources)Excellent choice of selected sources
(Best evidence - justification of sources)The explanation of why evidence was selected was superficial and lacked defined
reasoning(Introduction - basic background) Adequate introduction but various elements that would be expected to be
included in a report like this were absent
(Intro - Pathogens and disease outcomes) Adequate description of the effects of this disease on the host but more limited
content on the pathogens that cause the disease
(Intro - Risk factors and epidemiology) Very good discussion on the epidemiology of the pathogen and some description of
risk factors associated with the transmission of and infection by this pathogen
(Intro - Use of stats) Good use of validated statistics in your introduction
(Intro - Use of figures) No use of figures but this had no impact on the quality of the introduction
(VF - Range of mechanisms) Good range of mechanisms included in your figure
(VF - Depth of content) Good detail for multiple mechanisms included in your figure
(VF - Clarity of figure) Good figure, a little cluttered in places which make s it slightly difficult to follow
(VF - Use of evidence) Good citations but which elements of the figure they relate to is unclear
(HDM - Range of mechanisms) Very good range of mechanisms included in your figure
(HDM - Depth of content) Good detail for multiple mechanisms included in your figure
(HDM - Clarity of figure) Good figure, a little cluttered in places which make s it slightly difficult to follow
(HDM - Use of evidence) Good sources but which elements of the figures each citation relates to is unclear
(Treatment - standard therapy) Adequate description of some standard therapeutic options but other options were poorly
described or omitted entirely
(Treatment - resistance, treatment failure, new agents) No content on treatment failure or novel drug discovery included
(Prevention - standard prevention techniques) Good description of a variety of standard prevention techniques both
immunological and non-immunological
(Prevention - novel strategies) Good discussion on prevention techniques, either immunological, non-immunological or
both, but overall the content lacked detail
(Structure and presentation of the report) Very good standard of presentation and a well structured report
(Referencing and citation) Very good range of carefully selected sources, good integration within the text